NC0088404_More Information (Received)_20210805

TRANSMITTAL
Date: August 3, 2021
LASH
ENGINEERING Attention of: Derek Denard
Consulting Engineers
Civil,Planning,Wastewater Company: Div.of Water Resources,WQ Permitting Section
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews,NC 28105 From: Michael Lash, PE.
Phone:[phone]
mikel(o�lashengineerinq.com Project: Harrison Residence-Wastewater Direct Discharge
Special Instructions:
I apologize for the delay, but we finally got finished with Mr. Gray's EAA documents. Since a
lot has happened to all of us this last year, let me give you a reminder.
Mr. Gray had a Direct Discharge Permit, but he let it lapse. That Permit Number is:
NC000088404. When he investigated into getting it reactivated, he was told that he needed to
bring the permit up to date and that included completing the EAA reports. We have completed
that and also had a new National Inventory for Endangered Species and an updated
watershed report.
Mr. Gray has since sold the property to the Harrison's. A copy of the GIS Property Report
showing them as the owner is included in the submittal. They asked to me to complete the
process. Their contact information is included in my Engineer's Report.
Thank you for the assistance that you have provided with this project.
If you have any questions, please call me at: 704-847-3031. RECEIVED
Thanks AUG ash PE. 0 5 2021
NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES

/ \ \ , • a. 42,;\ ,a
Nor h /
1 \
\ \ o
a \
;oil \ .
73
z
n '% r- 1
o70
ARRIS'8N a to \;
\ a OPERIfY \
rn
, i7e2 4. .1 1 \-
o 1
h
51
-93
93 1 1 .h
I h
\___...,
\ zl-•is•-.
,'.."/-fie'! �Si„•' ',
i ,
ALA =
? 14265 , 'SC
rz
\sikcist:ei...., ,s4,00,
444000
OWNERS: ° 1ON' C-rNIA. LA5 H
Teresa & Edward Direct Discharge Wastewater . I��
Harrison Treatment&Disposal System ENGINEERING
Rapids at French Broad WWTP Permit NC0088404 ■ Iilre `°"° "' i"°°''�''"�°'
Old US 25 E.70 and Monticello Rd. t pn�rcarro
Rapids at French Broad WWTP , 1 Mona
4/84-3o31
Weaverville, NC. Buncombe County , 1—., a elk mo4/847�303t
Buncombe County Prop ID.#972278238600000
�� ncelolaeheryr,eaing oom
Page 1

Lash Engineering, Inc.
C iv i l/Con suiting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews,NC 28105
Phone: 704-847-LashEng3031
m kelineering.com
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) update to Existing Permit
Table of Contents
Descriptions Page
1. Cover Sheet 1
2. Table of Contents 2
3. Existing Permit to be Updated. 3
4. Survey 12
5. GIS Property Report 13
6. Harrison Tract GIS Site Plan 15
7. Harrison Engineers Report 16
8. Soil Scientist Report 18
9. EAA- MSD Public Sewer E-mail 19
10. EAA- MSD Public Sewer Map 20
11. EAA- Public Sewer Design 21
12. EAA Public Sewer Availability Evaluation -Alt."A" 22
13. Soil Map & Descriptions 24
14. EAA—Subsurface Sketch 27
15. EAA Alternative "B" Subsurface Option Report 28
16. EAA—Surface Drip Sketch 31
17. EAA Alternative"B" Surface Drip Option Report 32
18. EAA Alternative"C"Wastewater Reuse Option Report 36
19. EAA Alternative"D" Direct Discharge 39
20. EAA Summary 40
21. Endangered Species Report 42
22. Endangered Species Invoice 46
23. Endangered Species Photo of House Site 47
24. Endangered Species Photo of River(bank). 48
25. Firmette Floodway Map 49
26. NC Surface Water Classification 50
27. NC Surface Water Classification Map 51
28. Harrison Watershed Stream Stats 52
Page 2

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment A .
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor I1CDEI'IR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
April 11, 2007
David Gray,President
Bright Water,LLC
P.O. Box 4355
Asheville, North Carolina 28805
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit
Permit NC0088404
Rapids at French Broad WWTP
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Gray:
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the draft permit for your facility. Please review the draft very carefully
to ensure thorough understanding of the conditions and requirements it contains.
Please submit any comments to me no later than thirty days following your receipt of the draft. Comments
should be sent to the address listed at the bottom of the previous page. If no adverse comments are
received from the public or from you, this permit will likely be issued in early June,with an effective date of
July 1,2007.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this draft permit, contact me at the telephone
number or e-mail address listed at the bottom of this page.
Sincerely,
/17
// Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer II
NPDES-West
cc: NPDES Permit File
Asheville Regional Office/ Surface Water Protection
John T. Coxey,P.E.
John T. Coxey Consulting Engineering
53 Fox Chase Rd.,West
Asheville,NC 28804
NPDES Unit,1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699 919 733-5083,extension 594 (fax)919 733-0719
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer sergei.chernikov@ ncmail.net
Page 3

Permit NC0088440
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Draft PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Bright Water, LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Rapids at French Broad WWTP
Old US 25 &70 and Monticello Rd.
Weaverville
Buncombe County
to receiving waters designated as French Broad River in the French Broad River
Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 30, 2010.
Signed this day
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 4

�7`J f.,� , F i, "---t-1 it.it. `, t -' r1 r'J� ,'''? ?, i - �}U-e-�`,\\.,/ -.c'1.,..T- ., "'Y• 1 t t + l� /
t r L.:::, - fi4 r/r lot( t �v� , / D J,'{. ob "^ �7 i -- f ice,t' �-�/ I I
ti v ,i •
+ `kc ,,' x\ j,, _'t �'" +� t'✓.;.111rv� . \ \ r 1 �,• /�� r.,, J'f., 5 b
r, /> ,, . ' /tom ( i + i"' + '
. 7 ,r ' t'• '' -ttt /rj t ,Et`-.y �V fru ."„ r{l` ft'_r�i 7 b ''•--- , 11-rr "'�
=mot,r.i L JJt + !!///I \ 1. r ti t r r: .� r I
, ' zj 4 t � � ) L1 0 !4 4r' ;� �y:
`' � •s s +., .i 1 tr'w_ t` \'_-oil 6 ma \: I S{ ,�
' `s ``� �.�-_- r . t � r'��'(,y.-`l ` f�,nr"`=;,- r�4f:�`� ,,-, LR (, =� ' t-••• rr.-.-^., '..r!;-�Tt �
• �C Mile +.s/' S q�V 1�fw ` � � lr4 ti ,y }' 1 r i iIA' 1 ,•7-� l
/ 4 n f-- L Z3rJ /'xt + j'-",,`i ----i v.yf/-/�N., 1\`? y x\, �\\r:�^+4 �e�J ;',`-it /i�t �.� � �� ripe
-, -l',"*. 'r r/ '¢` • `-1 "' - Id 1t Sif f '-` j ..•,, t, } r ,--_.,, .. ny'
''i ti � ,.+ . • ,,_l t;.,r�7 f; : I(Y,Ir;t •/..0 ✓ t, .p�;,1 f ^',, r� „` • z, F�r ,
I : ', '\C a• .( , (``..71.1_�� 7` ? ram••! .t jr',.-�t y f,,F 11 _7-+ r ,�,•- •'. , t 1 :j ,
id�d'���}1i � 151� `r \ _ sr ?'}�� �,l' //�'i�r'�� '��`.�\,r.' � fi t+"� �'<<. \„� J�:
J !. !/if3.icfiaijry ^ ly \ \ ( , tts.-' _ +\ Sijr �-` f[ �t�� �1�i . Ir \ ~� •- lr- '\. , *% /
•'IS. / '..-, ``ti t r i/ � +� � Ill �..�-`"1!\�.�'�tiS! l• `������ \ ••'t t'�f 4 I, �tl, 1!/`r^- /(r 1.-- • +!'-'�'
o� -. /v!y - ,• + G=4 Cr�r ! ,-�1 ).1: , (, 1 \� ( 1• 1 .• r�' ` r - `
e`, ' 4.� to` t1t �t ♦ '- f lv � , '1 �,..-.I. �� 1 i • x � - j-, �
�( 1 i f1r -A .t‘,1 LC «-7 ti .tt \\ nx r ,\yJ%f
ri�1' i''�.l'y>?, fi .,Y� -° .-.r \ L4,I`t, �'P i,1V r 1 �� I, t_'. ',..`;::-...1 rr1, + ti_•,, x t.,f tl 10 l E
•��/,/rr , " 't_LL _--!i. S �...s ierrr"" - j , \u :f, tort r. 1 f .R lam ! f / i
r,i \- '. ..--..+t I!I.a, of
..z1,„,,,-,-:,,,,,,,.-. 1,� �.\h'--'_�- • ,, -,- _ do- . " ram fir' r 1)'''',-.,,8�1.�_>\' ✓ '>, Y+ ' !♦ r1 ,_ �6` �.
y t,,,v� ."t- >.�;,,, , \3 7 ``''r; lit ` 1y`l, ^_-_` Y�+ ;1
r �{ 1 , ' 4' __-.�+1 •:*:ifr.t i-x f Ir r Z MiF8 `ttiti+�` 1 t- f }�r((- 11 t M#+y -• .,'�J '' t $•' _'• '
ry M1r( "'-'t r ,; Scr-rl + 7fit.Y ��` 3 lr" i {' J j a �,// `i l �` 'Thli a1� .4�
`� _ ( ,} ,•., a\1• `S''J '/� 6\)\ t .t11 , t�. ; 'it \ • ` t' i1 t r '•
is './ i 11 @ � „ .�t �,, r�i t C 1 r ft�f l p :IS\ . ... a t�7 ,:,,, , i _,
f lc iai ! ti/,' r/ '.� /,� � ► {. ,..� ,� f 'tea
1 ✓'� /D'(II,..ti i• •` > //i,• ['� �t)` A. r� �'+ii� J� /} l� � f f 7\,- . f F. '1! �_r '�1 7
,., �4„ /
/ j r+ .22fr C- '''''''..-1‘.
;.f•" - 6, n•, \, 1N f S, i r .i ` ~"I1. � \s "�J// •�{it• t ;r 1�-� e +.t t v.zr-�fl riJ� yr - '4'•ti f S t. '� .r: ti 1J/r- if if
( ✓ r '>. a- u�
s+, , .,fI ,_
�' 1 'f,,(7 - ti ( i ) ' \ ;� s gC✓'�k I!: ,_ _+ i ?: cx3 n ; 4\�
-/ , , , .,
of n* ! `, .?'' `�(i•C')�.1"i` lti ~`t 3,fi Out fall 001
� t r _, t I ' t
/ ��'. t 1 , iF fti Z4/ 4,T_ S ,'gc. ! • ,:t i f 1 1 / D i _ 1;
•
`r 3•'+(1 aa, + ,a {t••,,"�r =_ �'- - ` I. I. 0 i'`{.,Y,20 3e'Ji�+1t)rf�''--.' r+.:J-.3( f,�,1f- r/,`:r i i ,,--f
{}rt -\c, t ``1 Tr D _`,�+ 1� �.,\".�. ��/I,i - •i`t y f/iJ `J�l -,.1!Ile"- t�, \'--!./�?,-+.r
•
.,_, fy r ,f r-.' -4 , 1 .'��,r I O�J,/// �Y�. l U /, r• •
"/I� ,� �Jr - .
j ft:` !•_y :"� t, .�` `�l„�I { ,�` . "-„•, *b� j I. a- {try ,, i� „ W;: �l
f:�i/ ,• t (` r rr•.? r r.i it i 1i ..,,;.<( �� e.B' V
p _,
Q ', j • }. ', t f• L iji ' --' 4 tip.4 !r 8 .�''1.,''''.
"'titi -.TA-,-,-. ` :) .--':'%i r
1`~-.`�•r 1' ,• - ��O'� ..�n+.;J ,1 t\itt; -.,. 7 .n. c'-- --s ,f 1:�'`ys.kk ,i..- —I% r !,
U 1 t
,�i--•• �. + (.'. / r r .+// 1/ t 4�4.1�._1--' _,. .,.~'�4! f�t G - L...�'r •,�•,} t lie t J � i_�i'
1 1 • I - �-`y�-' +y t
l� r/ ��1 - +. /)(J .1 ti{ \it R �' I i+{.�Y�'•!�\ '�V r`- It (...
vi
�,yr-1 c DT ..�—•.Nt
y/ I• i ' r 1 s {f l`�( ��f_' ...,FF. J tf u�.; �#fPI( t �.. t(�,lY r+ --y
r
ti � ; )! <,r!-l_ t! ; :tit�% 41A�'4� t `��`',
- '
a ` it"�� �J ol ,t41'` L�1i i !+� S('i
,' -, •1. .._, ,,.) l t/,r rv. - ' 7 'r` 1. ^-,1-.$�'. .-,-\. :; $. - :,:.?--,: •.—......1::.\,n (("1v'„
+ f ! `• • ,Lam/' •t ► rR- � II '1,'\f%r fl • i. `�`-••Z.0 ' U ,' 4... ',, '-- - - ,\` t /y
f - _: f�'-• - et ram! f Nya�`�.� l t t, ( L` +i. 6� '� �,T .�•,, r.� I F 94 !{t ti-
• o. e_�/ �t '•..,� ,1`t\+�L �r1(-_,:J ,! is ��,'+1,, '-♦1:t:, ♦'7 •`\+'•/,`� / 1� � i},j�� j••,` , ' •
1 :: 77 C J Lf /+ 1 t-•: ter 1, '7 f • �.. 4 ba
` �'r.,r I j// /`5+ v f ---' ` /'iLL (.i, t j�f ;7 r 41 /, '. / /fff !r� ._r7 i _ ,J:
,.,:1 ! eta, r i a, ,_i.R,t ,,$ ,,,' ,j 1t l •f t _.,•t'� -.-L yr : 11 �! to t
{
Latitude:35°41'44" Rapids at French Facility `ry
Longitude: 82°36'49" x .x -r
Receiving Stream:French Broad River Broad WWTP Location y.
Stream Class:B NC0088404
Subbasin:040302 Page 5
Buncombe County North

r
Permit NC0088440
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning upon completion of the construction of WWTP and lasting
until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Type Sample
Average Average Maximum Frequency Location
Flow 0.0022 MGD Continuous Recording Influent or
Effluent
BOD,5-day(20°C) 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent
Fecal Coliform(geometric 200/100 mL 400/100 mL Weekly Grab Effluent
mean)
Total Residual Chlorine1 28 pg/L 2/Week Grab Effluent
Total Nitrogen _ Semi-Annual Grab Effluent
Total Phosphorus Semi-Annual Grab Effluent
Temperature(°C) Weekly Grab Effluent
pH2 Weekly Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Limit and monitoring applies only if chlorine is added for disinfection.
2. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard
units.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts
•
Page 6

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No.NC0088404
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name: Bright Water,LLC/Rapids at French Broad WWTP
Applicant Address: P.O.Box 4355,Asheville,North Carolina 28805
Facility Address: Old US 25 &70 and Monticello Rd.,Weaverville,North Carolina
Permitted Flow: 0.0022 MGD
Type of Waste: _ 100%Domestic.
Other Permit(s): N/A
Facility/Permit Status: Class II/New
County: _ Buncombe County
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream: French Broad Regional Office: Asheville
Stream Classification: B USGS Topo Quad: E8NE—Weaverville,NC
303(d)Listed? Yes(biological) Permit Writer: Sergei Chernikov
Subbasin: 04-03-02 Date: February 20,2007
Drainage Area(mi2): 1050
Summer 7Q10(cfs) : 470
Winter 7Q10(cfs): 630 •
30Q2 (cfs) :
Average Flow(cfs): 2300
IWC (%): 0.0007%
Lat. 35°41'44"N Long. 82'36'49"W
BACKGROUND:
Rapids at French Broad WWTP is a proposed Class II, 100% domestic wastewater treatment
system that treats waste from a small development that consists of 6 homes with 3 bedrooms in
each. The EAA for this facility has been approved on January 16, 2007. Effluent limitations are
based on the Level B model,which was completed on February 15, 2007.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: February 28,2007(est.)
Permit Scheduled to Issue: April 24,2007(est.)
NPDES CONTACT:
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Sergei Chernikov at [phone] ext. 594.
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS:
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC00331 I I Renewal Page 7
Page 1

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality I NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit NCOO
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up -down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise,please print or type.
1. Contact Information: /
Owner Name � �j f� t� / 61.
Facility Name 'j/5< Ailiai125r
Mailing Address r_'j , ,i
City 715`,/,c'p''/LLB.
State / Zip Code ri4, J7,l /riA'fJ�i-/,e, G� r
Telephone Number (Y3233/5 -ASS
Fax Number (Y.15/ . -e-mail Address
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same address as above ❑
Street Address or State Road '
City // b /i«
State / Zip Code o'</Tii
Countyl/iGl ' �'�/,5'
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, public organization or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not
referring to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name j',t'i'G.#T 4'CJi//JJ/'
Mailing Address 'e2 l iC T3 5 5-
City
State / Zip Code re:%L'r1 1'i� L � �1 �'�G • `S-�t%Telephone Number ( ZS,f� /9 - /5 5 4,
Fax Number ( )9 :fit-5
1 of 1 - Form-D 1/06
Page 8

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
4. Description of wastewater.
Facility Generating Wastewater(check all that apply):
Industrial ❑ Number of Employees
Ca-imercial ❑ Number of Employees
Residential ®. Number of Homes
School ❑ Number of Students/Staff
Other ❑ Explain:
Describe the source(s) of wastewater(example: subdivision, mobile home park, shopping centers,
tes:aurants, etc.): 5-4/46P/ �5/wits
Population served:OZ 7`
5. Type,Type,f collection system
eparate (sanitary sewer only) ❑ Combined (storm sewer and sanitary sewer)
6. Outfall Information:
Number of separate discharge points /
Outfall Identification number(s)
Is the outfall equipped with a diffuser? El Yes (1�, -I�o
7. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall):
8. Frequency of Discharge: [c ----Groi tinuons ❑ Intermittent
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: Duration:
9. Describe the treatment system
List all installed components, including capacity, provide design removal for BOD, TSS, nitrogen and
phosphorus. If the space provided is not sufficient, attach the description of the treatment system in a
separate sheet of paper.
6
�A 4 ? �5�/5� 5 �it�G. . i414JJ �i� /I' /D s
/G/7"/LE /��4/4 /4i i/ii / 5g 7?7G-
,7 1), 4e t/I' t/V U/S/.l�C45r}-7 42
2 of 2 Forth-D 1/08
Page 9

r
NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
10. Flow Information:
Treatment Plant Design flowAW07/b MGD
Annual Average daily flow /�//¢ MGD (for the previous 3 years) 11I/ , 1.11-1T)
Maximum daily flow /`/% MGD (for the previous 3 years) , j,4"/I'
11. Is this facility located on Indian country?
❑ Yes
12. Effluent Data /1„/I ,�✓,�G(/ Ci¢C%C/.1y
Provide data for the parameters listed. Fecal Coliforrn, Temperature and pH shall be grab samples,for all other
parameters 24-hour compocitP sampling shall be used.Effluent testing data must be based on at least three
samples and must be no more than four and one half years old.
Daily Monthly Units of Number of
Parameter
Maximum Average Measurement Samples
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOD5)
Fecal Coliform
Total Suspended Solids
Temperature (Summer)
Temperature (Winter)
pH
13. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications:
Type Permit Number Type Permit Number
Hazardous Waste(RCRA) NESHAPS (CAA)
UIC (SDWA) Ocean Dumping(MPRSA)
NPDES /�-vP�L%Cs48T/G'/✓Dredge or fill(Section 404 or CWA)
PSD (CAA) Special Order of Consent(SOC)
Non-attainment program(CAA) Other
14. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of
my knowledge and beliefcomplete,such information is true, ems and accurate.
/
Printed flame ()nelson Signing Title
3 of 3 Foam-D 1/06
Page 10

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM I3
For privately owned treatment systems treating 1006/0 domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
Signatu o Applicant Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) states: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement
representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be
maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, or
who falsifies, tampers with, or knowly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be
operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that
Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed
six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or
imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.)
4 of 4 Form-D 1/06
Page 11

•
SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION REGISTER OF DEEDS: I �i
STATE Of NORTH CARE.. SOAPS Of NORTH CAROUNA \ \ fi C N
COUNTY Of BUNCOMBE COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE \ tlA�
I.BRIM T.EMMETT,CERTIFY TINT TN6 PUT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY FRBD FOR RECISTMTON ON THE_DAY OF 2016. OC \ T16$ .
SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY NIDE UNDER MY SUPFIN190H
(DEED DESCRIPTOR RECORDED IN DEED BK 432L�PAGE \fen AT_ M.ARO RECORDED N PUT BOON�� S NOE SURVEY
W
);THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ME CLEM,'INDICATED AS DRAWN 1
FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN DEED BOOK 417E PAG 22nre
;TNT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED 6 1:10.5•1 REGISTER OF DEEDS
AIT : �' I I
TNT THIS PUT WM PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE W C.S.47-30 AS \ i
MEN.,I M50.3.1191 CERTIFY THAT 1TIL5 SURVEY 6 OF THE BY:
FOLLOWING CATEGORY M DESCRIBED IN G.S.47-30(0(11), DEPUTY \ I
IN 6T32.39.E 60.07.
C)1)SURVEY 6 OF M EMT.PARCEL OR PARCELS OF l AND DOES \ 49 9021'49"E
NOT CREATE A NEW STREET OR CHANGE AN EXISTING BIHEET. 39•E
150.00 I VICiIN1TY MAP
N 6732'
(1.T.&)
WITNESS MY HMD AND SEAL THIS 214 DAY Of,D^FCFMRER 2016. I II
C^RI"AA
ad.T.L=3S93 �.\;,H
p: •A.,'SS77, !'
II S Dst 6'41 ETFAO' 61.66'
'R '� ' I ®R
,� er a0SrF o0 li
._____1i
•
'',+„ r. rg,.,, I
SBS ar4Y5B•E
$EVIEW OFFICER CERTIFICATION: - I .47' • i7
STATE OF NORTH CAROUNA _ _- I 939
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE _ 3
I. •FEWEw aFFTCER TI I I I t _
OF BUNCpeff COUNTY,CERTIFY THAT THE MAP OR PIAr TO T)
WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION 6 AFTNED MEETS ALL STATUTORY �� I S.n 1 _© 2
REDUIEMEHTS FOR RECORDING. Z I - I / ` C)
7 0 1 0
I N E
OFFICER OFTIt m I I I§ UI I U
23 z
DATE I I> I a
cn
O I
" I I I S 0,'27'49•E
242.44'
I �.-54.1C i
4
LEGEND:
Tao Meld.Sy..we
w found In M drawl,. I _
■CONCRETE MONUMENT SET -
• UNMMmED POINT
• PK COAL SET I -
•IRON PIN SET
W RR SPIKE FOUND
0 IRON RN FOUND
❑CONCRETE LONUMENT FOUND
SI CABLE 5 BO%
40 TRMSFORMER I I
RIE _ S DP31'26•E
O owe.. v T9' S].42'
'1796.6' /- • I I
- UGHT POLE
9,POWER POLE I
•
®WATER METER
•WELL I I I P I BOUNDARY SURVEY
—T-T—OVERHEAD TELEPHONE E9E
—E-E—ENOSHE EIEGnec
~- R-FENCE S 13957'15 W 174.00' I•I S BW57',5 W I86.46' I DAVID GRAY
NOTES o I
1.SUBJECT O ALL EASEMENTS AHD RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD. I I I I OWNER OF RECORD
2.AREA CALCULATED BY COORDINATE C 0-23 ON. BRIGHT WRIER LLC
3.SUBJECT PROPERTY P.I.N.: 9722-76-2386.
4.THERE ME NO NORTH CINA ORM MONUMENTS WITHIN 2000 Of THE OLD M4R511NC HWT
NFDI
SUBJECT PROPERTY. I ALEXAIJOER,NC 2B70i
5.THIS PROPERTY UES IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AS FRENCH BROAD TOW%SNIP
SNORN ON ROOD TGIMANCE RATE MAPS(F.I.RM.)FOR BUNCOMBE COUNTY. BUNCOMBENORMCOUNTY,NOR CAR..
0 IDATE DECEMEM 21,201E
DRAWING NO.:15-454
Appalachian I
Surveying 160 Deerchase Lone c.
DELrRlse a iszo
Chuckey, TN 37641 P.B.59.PG.ss
6nsultants, P.A. Phone [phone]
li ti Surveying/Land Planning WWW.oppoiochiansurvey.com 0 a�i?a
Brian T. Bartlett, PLS, CFS NCBELS License No.: C-2898

Buncombe County Assessment
Lila Property Record Search
BUNCOMBE COUNTY ASSESSMENT PROPERTY RECORD SEARCH
972278238600000 SANDERSON JOHN M,SANDERSON VICTORIA R,HARRISON Total Appraised VE
TERESA,HARRISON EDWARD 53 21
' v Lv iVi ,Sh iALL HWY 2402 PINE ISLAND CT,JACKSONVILLE,FL,32224 7
Key Information
Zoning -
Land Use Code RES BLDG LOT
Fire District FFB
Present Use -
Exemption -
Legal Description Deed Date:11/12/2020 Deed:5977-1413 Lot:B Plat:0069-0085
Plat Reference
Assessment Details
Land Value $53,200
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total Appraised Value $53,200
Deferred Value $0
Exempt Value $0
Total Taxable Value $53,200
LAND INFORMATION
ZONING LAND USE CODE SIZE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSED VALUE FLOODPLAIN
OPEN USE RES BLDG LOT 0.62 acres FBRA $53,200 YES
BUILDING INFORMATION
Building(s)
No data to display
TRANSFER HISTORY
TRANSFER DATE TRANSACTION PRICE VALID SALE BOOK/PAGE DEED INSTRUMENT
2020-11-12 $140,000 Qualified Sale 5977-1413 WDT
2006-02-08 $40,000 Qualified Sale 4176-1220 WDT
2002-06-05 $0 Not Qualified 2819-99 WDT
1997-10-15 $0 Not Qualified 1989-724 WDS
VALUE CHANGE HISTORY
DATE OF VALUE EFFECTIVE TAX LAND BUILDING FEATURES NEW
CHANGE YEAR REASON FOR CHANGE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
2017-01-27 2017 RAPP REAPPRAISAL $34,700 $0 $0 $34,70C
Developed for Buncombe County Assessment Property Record Search by
Data last updated:08/02/2021 Page 13

RECENT PERMIT ACTIVITY
No data to display
`
\
:-
. . / \ .
�� \ . .
. �y � <»> , p�
. v § \ < t
\ .' \ ,\
' II .
! \ k 4 .E1 _ ,
\ ° A
\ . »
\> y . . »3 11-2: � , : 4 3 w ©
\\\ems^ ` +~
` \ » « 2
® z zw=
111/1
\ t \I
. . „._ .• -a « •�« « . r \ ' \®1«/». 4 . :. .
,
Page 14

r -
-116 e ar ' d II},` +u sis ." '. k, .
> '',.."1101
'
U9 a7
.4
A ... .. . _ ,
•
} .
1 t1
'Fynµ 1.
�..
Fi 1'i { •`k $L t•
1a� b. Y .,M. r t�`
A s i -, Y ..71 .T
. is _+
4
T'
✓ ♦ ? .y..l .M1S '' �f. *`ems t 6—
-‘-'Vik4
. � ', :
•
i r '.
•
wj•
r'� . -
. �li -t. `
• '
,it
y
9

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews,NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
mikel(a),LashEnuineering.com
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Project Summary for:
Harrison: Old US 25E.70 and Monticello Rd.
Near Weaverville, Buncombe County, NC.
Update to Permit #0088404
The project is located on the French Broad River, close to the town of
Weaverville, NC. in Buncombe County. It is unimproved with no existing
structures. A previous wastewater permit for a Direct Discharge into the river
was issued in April 2007 to the former owner of the property, a Mr. Gray. Mr.
Gray completed this permitting process and had since sold the property to the
Harrisons' — which want to update the permit. The existing permit restricts the
Design Flow to less than 1 ,000 gpd. The Harrisons are aware and will not
proposed a bedroom count that would exceed that number based on a 120 gpd
design flow per bedroom. That existing Permit Number is 0088404. The
Harrisons contact information is:
Teresa & Edward Harrison
Teresa: tshart2( gmail.com Edward: ehh2009( gmail.com
619-206-8116 904-629-6056
2402 Pine Island Ct,
Jacksonville FL 32224
The lot is narrow with one side bordering the river the other side bordering the
Right-of-Way of US 25E. We have included a map from GIS information that
shows the property, river, and highway. The soils are typical for a riverbed that
has been built up over time with rocks, cobbles, layer on layer. It also has areas
of fill from the construction of the highway. The existing soils are not sufficient to
support a wastewater system, so a direct discharge system for the wastewater
effluent was proposed. A private soil scientist (Earthwise Designs) was
dispatched to the site. We have included her findings with this submittal.
An Environmental Report was generated from the National Heritage Foundation.
That report is included. It found several species of fish, plants, and aquatic life -
Page 16

which I would suspect to be true along such a river. However, with the type of
system that would be used, the only impact would be at the riverbank to install a
discharge line. A location could be chosen to have the least number of impacts
possible. I have also included some pictures of the property and riverbank.
The Engineering Alternative Analysis was conducted for the property. Those
reports are included in this submittal. If there are any questions, please give us a
call.
Thanks,
Mike
Page 17

Rug 15 06 07: 48p Earthwise Designs 828) 247-0067 p. 1
Caroline J. Edwards, N.C. Licensed Soil Scientist#1220
Earth wise Designs
724 Duncan Road Rutherfordton, NC 28139
828)247-0067 cell# 289-0122 [e-mail]
March 31, 2006
To: David Gray
Bright Water, LLC
PO Box 4335 Asheville, NC 28805
Re: Site Evaluation for Onsite Wastewater System, Buncombe County
French Broad River site, on north of Woodfin on Old US 25/70;
2.49 ac; PIN #9722.02-78-231 1
Earthwise Designs performed a site evaluation for an onsite
wastewater system at the above referenced site. The site was evaluated
using criteria contained in 15 A NCAC 18A .1990, "Laws and Rules for
Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems".
The Flood Boundary Survey map from 2001 by Peterson
Engineering & Surveying regarding the site was also reviewed.
After evaluation of the site and review of the flood boundary map, it
is clear there is no available space for onsite wastewater systems.
Considering the setbacks to the river and the setback to the fill of the
highway, there is no space left to evaluate.
If there were, it would likely be old fill material from highway
construction mixed with alluvial deposits, unsuitable material for onsite
septic systems.
Thus it is my professional opinion that this area does not have
suitable available space for any type of onsite wastewater disposal and
this option should be eliminated from consideration as a wastewater
disposal site for development by the landowner. Please contact me if
further information is needed.
Sincerely yours, C,fr°�s�
c � Go1 r s�' fir. `•`'4�t�
Caroline J. ards rJ
NC Licensed Soil Scientist #1220 , st.
`';�;,
9i
E 12,?G
Page 18

RE: Public Sewer Availability for residential lot
Rhinehart, Heather <[e-mail]>
Thu 7/29/2021 1:38 PM
To: Michael Lash<[e-mail]>
Cc: PlanDevDept<[e-mail]>
1 attachments(783 KB)
OLD MARSHALL HWY MAP.pdf;
Good afternoon Mike,
There isn't sewer availability at this location.The closest sewer line is over a mile away and can't be obtained by gravity.
The black dotted line along the river,in front of the property is a proposed future master plan line that would require a pump
system and wouldn't be cost prohibited.
Hope this helps and let me know if you need any other information.
Thank you,
HEATHER A RHINEHART
System Coordinator II
MSD Planning&Development/Engineering Division
Metropolitan Sewerage District
2028 Riverside Drive
Asheville, North Carolina 28804
Phone:[phone]
Email:[e-mail]
From:Michael Lash<[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday,July 29,2021 12:36 PM
To:Sewer Applications<[e-mail]>
Subject:Public Sewer Availability for residential lot
My name is Michael Lash. I'm an engineer that is in the process of submitting a permit application for a Direct
Discharge permit for Ms. Teresa Harrison to the State. She will be building a three-bedroom home. We have
been in close contact with the NC.DWR (in Raleigh). Part of the application requests us to explore the
possibility of public sewer. We need to show on a map where the available public sewer is located -even if it
is very far away. I need to include this analysis in my report.
Lot information is:
Tax Parcel#972278238600000 on Old Marshall Hwy.just north of Monticello.
I have included several items that will assist you in locating the property.
I really only need two things; the first is a map that shows the available sewer that is closest to the property
(even if it's far away). The second thing can be written in the reply email and that is that there is currently no
sewer available at the site and that there are currently no plans for an extension.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Thanks,
Mike
Page 19

nPNSEwtayc 3 + _ r .'n," 4 1 ,i I x ._ r.3 - _r
o Fyn r C' i ,* :sit .0oT1TIcr CI Kr) ,, p "4S r
A +, I '' Y ---i L . M _ . 4,i- r r{fat? 1 1
'
$ �j4B E __rat'` _ �¢ r4 'i �QNt541D s n 7d I
1
y •
i I 4 = `. kt`f'Izs • I a rr JI i l�ARr _�C
x
f. v , <�..
La I . _`Q I' _-
€>
I I r %h;ll ,`'t\ 1,4
f •� ry ' �0
qe : l'. Kt:i:-.:1' ;, CnINfAs
'11--."':11:
-'Y-7'--7.T''-''1r'''7'''t:-':*:'''-
•
itr 1--
I,. I -� 3 YOB S A. +
4 f fl ;. 1
�115 ? -
a
�t�i-�E$ RD '.f„..r7) - V' 1` v ,1 r ,f [
yq
x s j
+ .a I
} •
YY
�t�. ,r del
o '",, ° �. �''' Q>' ESN;
,�� f AO ly!MOP it f
. _, ,.. ..„
..
. -
s L '�I ,. __ } �__ Y - tit` ■P,, I—ri_E
11"
•
I,44 I' ..r Il• 8 1i 2'3 •' 18 10?7t3 08
II ".,2 5Y dy e„YY r �y�. • r l • 1 1 t� '
•• ' 1. 107 '0
•
�i 3 C to '`. w�..y.. .� ' �'•__ �'t�.c1I f;-,�y `-[- .• 1 2.i; , 72. f L t�X¢,/L,.. flZr
4 - it ; +4�. � ''' i "'F'FIlta-63 .4 Ifti - _ ► T a -t-te;--{-
�7 ! , + r c�L"'1vIE4U�,n --_ tk ` 81' � 'lf 8418:? 82$9r.
dz 5
2
OLD MARSHALL HWY 1:12,000
9 Author. HEATHER RHINEHART Date: 7/29/2021
4 The Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, NC has prepared these maps based on best available information for use in assisting District maintenance work, service area analysis,and
D planning. The District does not warrant the accuracy of any of the information shown. Field verification is advised for all information shown on the maps or included with manhole data. No guarantee is
given as to the accuracy or currency of any of the data. Therefore,in no event shall the District be liable for any special,indirect,or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from
loss of use, data, or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence, or other action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the information herein provided. Grid shown is North Carolina
State Plane Coordinate System NAD 1983(North American Datum 1983).

=' - mONT1C✓:LLO Rp 1 m ri.
i
' '''''... .-', ‘----14-7 , ,
, : ,,,,
- `✓ \,"• %
O f �+ i 1 i
�. ! i i� i'' /ER Rs) \ I.
�� f :0 Q 1 t
;a\, S '� i' ;� --. /,.
\ ` _ Y O.n," }/ v �I - f
x
t ��
i
J/ � r
�� ' tic1 � " f
` e; nNEEper GO i
QE.G I I� :„<"
` � /`t-' // ,s 5,900'/3" `n
,l v�" '�\ FORCE . : N
/ l4 \, MAIN i y...._. -' ,. :OOOOf c�` j' "� IICOIIlbe" ✓ ,\ON FADS DR
..•F....r ' Y" i• ` Y ) per. __i -\fir
•
\ t y3
�i
Ito;a � , �Si ) ,
� i / �
fo
1 ,t �� JIISf" \
,... i
LE
MSD Sewer Map The Metropolitan Sewerage District(MSD) 1 in = 1,000 ft
Author:MSD Of Buncombe County Date: 7/29/2021
The Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, NC has prepared these maps based on best available information for use in assisting District
maintenance work,service area analysis,and planning. The District does not warrant the accuracy of any of the information shown. Field verification is
advised for all information shown on the maps or included with manhole data. No guarantee is given as to the accuracy or currency of any of the data.
Therefore,in no event shall the District be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of
use,data,or profits,whether in an action of contract, negligence,or other action,arising out of or in connection with the use of the information herein
L

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews,NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
Facility Name: Wastewater Facility for Harrison Residence
for Non-Municipal Applicant
2402 Pine Island Ct., Jacksonville, Fl. 32224
Alternative A; Public Sewer
Alternative A; Public Sewer Extension
Heather Rhinehart with the Metropolitan Sewerage District was contacted for the availability of
public sewer for this property. Heather points out that the nearest sewer is currently over a mile
from the site and located within the Town of Weaversville, which is north of Asheville and east
of the site. A map was provided that shows approximate locations for the Public Sewer. A route
was chosen that utilizes some State Right-of-Way and some land that would require easements
along the creek. The public sewer is many feet uphill of the site a pump system would need to
be utilized. A 3"Force Main was used because of the long distance. The distance to acquire
public sewer is approximately 5,900 feet away.
The sewer extension up the river is in the master plan(black dashed line along the river in their
plan)but is not a funded project and will not happen in the near future. However, if the sewer
main is extended up the river at some distant time in the future,then a request for sewer would
be made and the direct discharge permit would be negated.
Approximate cost for sewer main:
5,900/3"PVC sewer main laid adjacent to the existing road @ $130.00/ft. for pipe,manholes,
surveying and installation» $767,000. Costs for surveying ($20,000), engineering plans
($20,000), R/W& easement acquisition(20,000) sum up to approximately $60,000. In addition
to the cost of installation,the costs of maintaining a 5,900-ft. of 3"main over a 30-year period
could potentially be devastating. So, the sewer force main would need to be turned over to the
MSD for ownership and maintenance.
Tap fees» $800.00; Connection fee » $1,000.00
Page 22

Total Approximate for installation» $830,000
PP mate Cost
The Present Cost Analysis is included:
Present Value Cost Analysis:
PV = Co + C[(1+r)n-1 / r(l+r)n]
PV=Present Value of Costs
Co=Costs occurred in Present Year. $830,000.00(installation costs)
C=reoccurring costs The City would take over maintenance costs. $0.00
Yearly Sewer Bill na,$50/mth=> 12 x 50= $600.00
Total outlay of funds per yr. = $600.00
t= time in years. (t=0 is the first year)
n=Ending year of the Facility(use 20 years)
r=current EPA discount rate(this value could be determined by the website provided or
Google search)therefore,we used the value from the example of 5.625%
PV=$830,000+$600.00[(1+0.05625)20-1 /0.05625(1+0.05625)20]
PV=$830,000+600.00[1.9877/0.1889]
PV=$830,000+$600.00[10.520]
PV=$836,312.00
Conclusion:
Because the existing sewer is over a mile away from the house the costs are cost prohibitive for a
single homeowner. Extending these costs over a 30-year period and the costs of providing sewer
to a single residence is cost prohibitive.
Page 23

3 Soil Map—Buncombe County,North Carolina
i *
353900 353970 354040 354110 36N8o 354250 364320
i$
35°41'59"N 35°41'59 N
4
s,
II
.:, \
;,,W,a D 2w..
SIT ; r,
a gg, Will
4 E - 1 4 i
`J i
yp NNt. t r
W
-4•— 4,'RoF 1 '
tiNaEZ
r
1.7
ig
srf 1 ": 14 Y,i,
kV " i„,: :' 1, e ,_. 4
,�
}$ r 4 ." WaD2"
~� r ilk ; f a wit* .� , �f. ':
� `' " Its" }
35°41'39"N • ' •
35°41'39'N
353900 35370 354040 354110 354180 354250 354320
3 3
5 ^
Map Scale:1:3,040 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet
Meters
g N 0 45 90 180 270
Feet
A
0100200400Map projection:WebMenr4bor Corner coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zane 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey F7> a024
ridliii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Buncombe County,North Carolina
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) ., Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot
1:12,000.
P
Soils Very Stony Spot Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Wet Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Soil Map Unit Lines misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Other line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
C] Soil Map Unit Points contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
• Special Line Features
Special Point Features scale.
Blowout Water Features
Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
' Borrow Pit measurements.
Transportation
Clay Spot Rails Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Closed Depression Web Soil Survey URL:
• Interstate Highways Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
Gravel Pit US Routes Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Gravelly Spot Major Roads projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Landfill Local Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Lava Flow accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
Marsh or swamp is Aerial Photography This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s)listed below.
Mine or Quarry
Soil Survey Area: Buncombe County,North Carolina
Miscellaneous Water Survey Area Data: Version 17,Jun 2,2020
Perennial Water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Rock Outcrop 1:50,000 or larger.
Saline Spot Date(s)aerial images were photographed: May 3,2020—May 7,
2020
Sandy Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Severely Eroded Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
Sinkhole shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Slide or Slip
0o Sodic Spot
v
CD
N
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/2/2021
diNIE Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

I
Soil Map—Buncombe County,North Carolina
I
I
Map Unit Legend
IMap Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
RoF Rock outcrop-Oteen complex, 11.8 25.5%
30 to 95 percent slopes,very
bouldery
W Water 7.2 15.5%
WaD2 Walnut-Oteen-Mars hill 10.5 22.7%
complex,15 to 30 percent
slopes,moderately eroded
WaE2 Walnut-Oteen-Mars hill 11.6 25.0%
1 complex,30 to 50 percent
slopes,moderately eroded
0
WnF Walnut-Oteen-Rock outcrop 5.2 11.3/o
complex,50 to 95 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 46.2 100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/2/2021
joill Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Page 26

Buncombe County
rw"r d ;6132
i 660
e
Yp-i33
l
1\k‘ _ _ _ _
` 'I A c EYOSTEE',, ,3
1
w
x Elie' v rid
13
m July 12, 2021 1:2,257
N.) 0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 mi
v I i 1 .

1
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planing
1104 Cindy Can:Drive
Matthews,NC 28105
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
Facility Name: Wastewater Facility for Hunter Residence
for Non-Municipal Applicant
140 Rose Garden Lane, Waynesville,NC.
Haywood County
Alternative B; Land Applications-Subsurface
The land around the site is developed and occupied by existing owners. The homes were
built in the 60's, (this home in 1962)have small lots and have no available land with
good soils for repair. According to the Health Department,the creek in the rear has
"filled in" over the years and has saturated the disposal soils to the point where the
system is not useable. Each of the adjacent owners have their own existing sewer
systems. There is no other available land onsite for subsurface (or surface drip).
There are no golf course type businesses that could use a treated effluent for irrigation or
something similar.
Unfortunately none of the Soil onsite or nearby is available.
1
land become available,the followingwould
However, should apply:
Land in this area is being sold for approximately $40,000 per acre for within the
subdivision or land would have to be acquired outside of the subdivision at
approximately $20,000 per acre. Since the subdivision is built out with small lots then
land would have to become available outside of the subdivision. Access to the property
would need to be by current road rights-of-way. The closest land outside of the
subdivision is approximately 600' away.
The same wastewater treatment system would be utilized at the house with the same
design for collection and treatment. The effluent from the treatment process would then
need to be pumped to the available site approximately 300 feet away.
The existing soils on the property (two) and adjacent land according to the U.S.Dept of
Agriculture and the associated Soils Maps, are basically a SdC Saunook Loam, 8 to 15%.
Page 28

This soil map unit is moderately suited to septic tank absorption fields because of the
slope and the moderate permeability. The other soil type is a TuD Tuckaseegee-Cullasaja
complex, 15 to 30% slopes,very stoney. This soil type is poorly suited to septic tank
absorption fields because of the large stones and the steep slopes. Seeps and springs
cause excess wetness which interferes with the absorption of the effluent.
Both of these soil types would need special consideration and design for the absorption
fields. LTAR's could be low if possible, in these Classification Groups in order to spread
the effluent over a larger area. Therefore, using an assumed LTAR of"0.15", The 360
gpd disposal requirement would require 360/0.15 =2,400 sf. Also,need an equivalent
Repair Area=>2,400 x 2=4,800 sf or 0.11 acres. Utilizing setbacks and required land
geometry to install the drip tubing on contour the required land for disposal would be
approximately 0.25 acres.
Additional Costs for such a system above what would be required for the Direct
Discharge are summarized below:
Additional Equipment at House (over what is required for the Direct Discharge):
Pump Tank= 1,750-gal tank(for a couple days storage)
1,750g tank+pump, floats, control panel, etc. = $6,500
Distribution System:
1. 2"Force Main to get effluent to disposal site which would be offsite.
Using 600 feet of 2"PVC Force Main @ $35/ft= $21,000
2. Asphalt Repair(100' x 4')_>400sf. of asphalt paving @ $20/sf= $8,000
Disposal/Nitrification Field would utilize a drip system disposal and an associated
Headworks unit.
Headworks Unit @ $2,500 each plus $1,500 in appurtenances= $16,500
2,400sf of area would require 1,200 ft. of drip tubing @ $1.50/ft= $ 1,800
Land Acquisition:
0.25 acres of land @ $20,000/ac = $5,000
Access Road= 50' (aA $150/ft. = $7,500
Total Rough Costs for initial installation=> $66,300
Present Value Cost Analysis:
PV = Co + C[(1+r)n-1 / r(l+r)n]
PV=Present Value of Costs
Co=Costs occurred in Present Year. $66,300(installation costs)
C=reoccurring annual costs Annual Inspections: $600
Sample Collection: $100
Page 29

Tank Pump Out: $100
Lab Work: $100
Pump Replacement: $300
Drip Tubing Repair: $200
Access Road Repair: $200
Total outlay of funds per yr.=$L600
t= time in years. (t=0 is the first year)
n=Ending year of the Facility(use 20 years)
r=current EPA discount rate(this value could be determined by the website provided or
Google search)therefore,we used the value from the example of 5.625%
PV=$66,300+$1,600[(1+0.05625)204 /0.05625(1+0.05625)20]
PV=$66,300+ 1,600[1.9877/0.1889]
PV= $66,300+ $1,600[10.520]
PV=$83,132
Comparatively,this cost is prohibitive as the house and land is worth $130,000
Page 30

Buncombe County
' 31 OLD SALEM E. 0660
, � ,`
'i$ • \ Agt)
- ..
r
e
^ q
mt ..
TA EYOS,TEE1, �y
f a
SS BM Eli
3 �t , , .J
co
12, 2021 1:2,257
co
0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 mi
, 1

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews,NC 28105
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
Facility Name: Wastewater Facility for Hunter Residence
for Non-Municipal Applicant
140 Rose Garden Lane, Waynesville,NC.
Haywood County
Alternative B; Land Applications—Surface Drip or Spray
The land around the site is developed and/or occupied by existing owners. The homes
were built in the 60's, have small lots and have no available land with good soils. Each
of the adjacent owners have their own existing sewer systems. There is no other
available land onsite for surface drip or spray.
There are no golf course type businesses that could use a treated effluent for irrigation or
something similar.
Unfortunately, none of the Soil onsite or nearby is available.
However, should land become available,the following would apply:
Typical reasons for utilizing a surface system are when a subsurface solution is not
available. These would include but not be limited to a high seasonal water table, less
than 18" of permeable earth, or the residual material is full of clays or impermeable
material.
Land in this area is being sold for approximately$40,000 per acre for within the
subdivision or land would have to be acquired outside of the subdivision at
approximately $20,000 per acre. Since the subdivision is built out with small lots then
land would have to become available outside of the subdivision. Access to the property
would need to be by current road rights-of-way. The closest land outside of the
subdivision is approximately 300' away.
The same wastewater treatment system would be utilized at the house with the same
design for collection and treatment. A pump tank would have to be added or a Septitech
type treatment system utilized that had a pump tank built into the system. The effluent
Page 32

from the treatment process would then need to be pumped to the available site
approximately 300 feet away.
The existing soils on the property (two) and adjacent land according to the U.S. Dept of
Agriculture and the associated Soils Maps, are basically a SdC Saunook Loam, 8 to 15%.
This soil map unit is moderately suited to septic tank absorption fields because of the
slope and the moderate permeability. The other soil type is a TuD Tuckaseegee-Cullasaja
complex, 15 to 30% slopes, very stony. This soil type is poorly suited to septic tank
absorption fields because of the large stones and the steep slopes. Seeps and springs
cause excess wetness which interferes with the absorption of the effluent.
Both of these soil types would need special consideration and design for the absorption
fields. LTAR's could be low if possible, in these Classification Groups in order to spread
the effluent over a larger area. Therefore, using an assumed LTAR of"0.15", The 360
gpd disposal requirement would require 360/0.15 =2,400 sf. Also, need an equivalent
Repair Area=>2,400 x 2=4,800 sf or 0.11 acres. Utilizing setbacks and required land
geometry the required land for disposal would be approximately a half an acre.
Additional Costs for such a system- above what would be required for the Direct
Discharge are summarized below:
It would be an advantage to minimize the amount of land that would need to be acquired.
Surface Drip and Spray require wide setbacks to protect the adjacent property owners.
Spray systems require the most of the two. In order to minimize the amount of land
required for a surface system then the drip option will be utilized.
Land requirements for surface systems are sized based upon the use of a water balance.
Such a system calculates on an imaginary acre of land an estimation of the amount of
rainfall (input into the soil) and an associated amount of output being evaporation,plant
uptake and soil permeability. The difference between the two {outputs—the input
(assuming a positive number)} is the amount of effluent that the acre parcel of land can
receive. An assumption for the results of a water balance will be to choose a value that is
appropriate for the DhA Soil Type,which is a type of soil with a high seasonal water
table so the value is not a minimum but a midrange value. The amount of effluent from
the project is 360 gpd.
The amount of area required is approximately:
360 gals 365 days 12 in. 1 cf 1 vr. = 8,707 sf.
day yr. ft. 7.48-gals 24.21 in.
Tubing requirement for area is: 8,707sf./(48"/12") spacing=2,177 feet of drip tubing
This amount of drip tubing would require the standard residential Headworks unit. A
Repair area for a surface drip system is not required. The 8,707 sf of space is the useable
size for the disposal. Assuming a square, it would equate to a 94' x 94' area. Applying
the required 50' setbacks to property lines and needing a 25' work area on one side
equates to an area approximately 194' x 219' or 0.97 acres.
Page 33

The system would need to be treated to TS II standards and further treated with chlorine
or UV Light for pathogens.
Additional Costs for such a system above what would be required for the Direct
Discharge are summarized below:
Additional Equipment at House:
Pump Tank=4,000-gal tank(surface drip requires storage)
4,000g tank+pump, floats, control panel, etc. = $ 8,000
UV Light& Control Panel, Gauges, Sensors,Valving etc.= $18,000
Distribution System:
1. 2"Force Main to get effluent to disposal site which would be offsite.
Using 3001f. of 2"PVC Force Main @ $30/ft= $9,000
2. Asphalt Repair(100' x 4') =>400sf. of asphalt paving @ $20/sf= $8,000
Disposal/Nitrification Field would utilize a drip system disposal and an associated
Headworks unit.
Headworks Unit @ $2,500 plus $1,500 in appurtenances= $ 4,000
8,707sf. of area would require 2,176 ft. of drip tubing @ $1.50/ft= $ 3,265
Land Acquisition:
1.0 acres of land @$20,000/ac= $20,000
Access Road= 50' @$150/ft. = $ 7,500
Shed&Equipment=>$5,000 + $1,000= $ 6,000
Total Rough Costs for initial installation=> $83,765
Present Value Cost Analysis:
PV = Co + C[(l+r)n-1 / r(l+r)°]
PV=Present Value of Costs
Co=Costs occurred in Present Year. $83,765 (installation costs)
C=reoccurring annual costs Annual Inspections: $600
Sample Collection: $300
Tank Pump Out: $100
Lab Work: $200
Pump Replacement: $300
Drip Tubing Repair: $200
Access Road Repair: $200
Total outlay of funds per yr. =$1,900
t= time in years. (t=0 is the first year)
n=Ending year of the Facility(use 20 years)
Page 34

r=current EPA discount rate(this value could be determined by the website provided or
Google search)therefore,we used the value from the example of 5.625%
PV=$83,765 +$1,900[(1+0.05625)20-1 /0.05625(1+0.05625)21
PV= $83,765 + 1,900[1.9877/0.1889]
PV = $83,765 + $1,900[10.520]
PV= $103,753
Comparatively,this cost is prohibitive.
Page 35

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews,NC 28105
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
Facility Name: Wastewater Facility for Hunter Residence
for Non-Municipal Applicant
• 140 Rose Garden Lane, Waynesville,NC.
Haywood County
Alternative C; Wastewater Reuse
The land around the site is developed and/or occupied by existing owners. Each of the
adjacent owners have their own existing sewer systems.
Water Reuse is a wonderful way of utilizing a resource that otherwise would be
discarded. Unfortunately,there are just a few ways that treated wastewater effluent can
be used as a reusable resource. Common avenues of reusable options would include
irrigating with the effluent at a plant nursery, a golf course, landscaping or even a county
park. Another avenue of reuse could involve the residential property itself. The effluent
could be used as grey water for flushing toilets within the house which would not
eliminate the effluent, but it would significantly reduce the amount of water used by the
home.
In a practical way however,the house already has its plumbing built into the house as this
is an existing house. Therefore,the use of the effluent as grey water is not an option.
There are also no nurseries or golf courses available for use. The house does have
landscaping areas, but the underlying soils are not suitable for any type of permeability.
This house is just not capable for reuse.
However, should an area become available within proximity (within 1 mile)then the
option could become available and the following would apply for a Water Reuse Option:
The same treatment system could be utilized for the reuse option. A pump tank would
have to be added or a Septitech type treatment system utilized that had a pump tank built
into the system. The effluent from the treatment process could be pumped to the facility
that will utilize the treated effluent.
Page 36

The amount of effluent from the house is 360 gpd. A facility that could utilize this
amount of effluent on a daily basis would need to be able to utilize the extra
effluent/water on a daily basis and would probably be currently supplied by a water well
system or metered water from the City. The effluent from the house would supplement
their usage but probably not replace it and there would only be certain aspects of their
water demand where a treated effluent could be utilized. This report will assume that
such a facility exists as a golf course as that is the simplest and most inexpensive way of
reuse. The effluent will be used to supplement their sprinkler/irrigation system for their
greens and fairways.
Some golf course facilities have an onsite pond that is fed by rainfall but is also water
well subsidized as needed. Their irrigation system is fed by pumping from this pond on
almost a daily basis. Metered water from the City would be expensive to use for
irrigation. The house effluent would need to be treated to at least TS II standards and
further treated with an ultraviolet light for pathogen protection. Once treated the effluent
would need to be pumped through a 2" force main to the holding pond of the golf course
facility so that it could supplement the golf course facility. The golf course would
probably be located near an onsite pond (utilizing the golf course pond landscapes) and
be within 1 mile of the house. The force main will need to be installed through some
property but predominantly adjacent to existing streets within the City/State Right-of-
Ways and be installed according to City/DOT Standards.
Costs for such a system are summarized below:
Additional Equipment at House:
Pump Tank=4,000-gal tank(needs required storage)
4,000g tank+pump, floats, control panel, etc. _ $8,000
Additional Pumps,Valving, etc. for Reuse Rules= $15,000
UV Light& Control Panel, Gauges, etc.= $8,000
Distribution System:
1. 2"Force Main to get effluent to disposal site which would be offsite.
Using 5,2801f. of 2"PVC Force Main @ $30/ft= $158,400
2. Asphalt Repair(3,000'x 4')_> 12,000sf. of asphalt paving @ $10/sf= $120,000
Golf Course Pond Improvements:
Repair/Landscape Force Main installation in Golf Course= $30,000
Pond Improvements for outlet of pipe= $15,000
Backflow Prevention, Valving, &appurtenances $5,000
Total Rough Costs for initial installation=> S359,400
Page 37

Present Value Cost Analysis:
PV = Co + C[(1+r)n-1 / r(l+r)°]
PV=Present Value of Costs
Co=Costs occurred in Present Year. $359,400(installation costs)
C=reoccurring annual costs Annual Inspections: $600
Sample Collection: $750
Tank Pump Out: $100
Lab Work: $500
Pump/Parts Replacement: $600
Access Road Repair: $500
Total outlay of funds per yr. =S3,050
t= time in years. (t=0 is the first year)
n=Ending year of the Facility(use 20 years)
r=current EPA discount rate(this value could be determined by the website provided or
Google search)therefore,we used the value from the example of 5.625%
PV=$359,400+$3,050[(1+0.05625)20-1 /0.05625(1+0.05625)20]
PV= $359,400+ 3,050[1.9877/0.1889]
PV=$359,400+ $3,050[10.520]
PV=$391,486
Comparatively,this cost is prohibitive.
Page 38

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews,NC 28105
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
Facility Name: Wastewater Facility for Harrison Residence
for Non-Municipal Applicant
2402 Pine Island Ct., Jacksonville, Fl. 32224
Alternative D; Land Applications—Direct Discharge
4.Alternative D; Direct Discharge to Surface Waters.
1. The proposed house is modeled as a 3 bedroom house with a design flow of: 360 gpd.An Outfall
was chosen that produces the least amount of disturbance to property and recreation but can be
visually "hidden"with landscaping.
2. This Direct Discharge system will be designed utilizing the required TS II discharge with an UV
disinfection process.
3. A Project Summary is included in this application.
4. Present Value Cost Analysis:
PV = Co+ C[(1+r)n-1 /r(1+r)n]
PV=Present Value of Costs
Co=Costs occurred in Present Year. $20,000(installation costs)
C=reoccurring costs Annual Inspections: $400
Sample Collection: $100
Tank Pump Out: $ 50
Lab Work: $200
Pretreat Maintenance: $100
Pumps&UV Bulb replacement: $350
Total outlay of funds per yr. =$1,200
t=time in years. (t=0 is the first year)
n=Ending year of the Facility(use 20 years)
r=current EPA discount rate(this value could be determined by the website provided or
Google search)therefore,we used the value from the example of 5.625%
PV=$20,000+$1,200[(1+0.05625)20-1 /0.05625(1+0.05625)20]
PV=$20,000+ 1,200[1.9877/0.1889]
PV=$20,000+$1,200[10.520]
PV=$32,624
This initial cost has been approved by the Owners for this facility.
These annual costs (reoccurring) are acceptable parameters for this type of facility.
Page 39

Lash Engineering, Inc.
Civil/Consulting/Wastewater/Planning
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews,NC 28105
Phone:[phone]
[e-mail]
Lash Engineering, Inc.
Summary for Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)
Facility Name: Wastewater Facility for Harrison Residence
for Non-Municipal Applicant
2402 Pine Island Ct., Jacksonville, Fl. 32224
This project is located at PIN#972278238600000 on Old Marshall Highway in the City of
Weaverville in Buncombe County. These EAA reports were based on a proposed 3-bedroom
home. If more bedrooms are proposed,then these numbers would increase but the relationship
between the report findings would remain the same. This analysis is seeking to update the
existing Direct Discharge Permit.
The EAA is used to provide guidance to the regulating community for the evaluation of the
proposed wastewater disposal alternatives. This report is focused on summarizing the Steps
which are written in reports more detailed format as separate sections of the application.
The EAA is divided into several steps:
STEP 1:
1. Zero Flow Stream Restrictions.
The treated effluent would be discharged into a major river with positive flow. USGS report was
submitted previously as part of the existing discharge permit.
2. Stream Classification for the Receiving Waters.
This information was received and verified through the USGS website & GIS. The
information is presented in the Watershed Classification Report of this application (back).
The following is a summary information from the USGS:
The outfall discharge is to the French Broad River. The surface water classification for this area
is "B"within the French Broad River watershed.
3. Basin wide Water Quality Plans:
There does not appear to be any limitations on the French Broad River Basin that would limit the
residential
n ial wastewater discharges.
4. Impaired Waters and TMDL's
There were currently no TMDL projects listed for this part of the French Broad River per the
Buncombe County GIS map.
Page 40

5. Presence of Endangered Species.
The project was submitted through the website on 7-20-2021:
Rodney Butler is our contact person
Conservation Data Manager
NC Natural Heritage Program
Division of Land and Water Stewardship
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
A response letter from the Heritage Foundation is included in this application. The findings are
summarized below:
"that there are records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary."
STEP 2:
1. Reasonable Projections for Population &Flow
The Project is a proposed residential house. The existing permit has design flow restricted to less
than 1,000 gpd. Bedroom count at 120 gpd will not exceed this amount.
STEP 3:
Evaluate technologically feasible alternatives:
1. See individual Reports for Alternatives. Summary in Tabular Form is included
below:
TABULAR FORM FOR EAA SUMMARY:
EAA Alternative Reports are included in this submittal that fully explores the options of
Subsurface and Surface Drip systems. In summary:
1. Alternative A; Connection to Public Sewer
Extension of Public Sewer=> PV=$836,312
2. Alternative B; Land Applications
Subsurface Drip System => PV= S83,132
Surface Drip System=> PV= $103,753
3. Alternative C; Wastewater Reuse
Wastewater Reuse System=> PV=$391,486
•
4. Alternative D; Direct Discharge to Surface Waters.
Direct Discharge System=> PV= S32,624
If there are any questions related to this Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA),please contact:
Engineer Owner
Michael Lash, PE Teresa Harrison
Lash Engineering,Inc. Residence
1104 Cindy Carr Drive 2402 Pine Island Ct.
Matthews,NC. 28105 Jacksonville,Fl. 32224
Ph: 704-847-3031 Contact: Teresa Harrison
Email:mikelC lashengineering.com Email: tshart2agmail.com
Page 41

Roy Cooper,Governor
IMAM NC DEPARTMENT OF
D.Reid Wilson,Secretary
■o MI NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES■ Walter Clark
s ■
Director,Division of Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-15170
July 20, 2021
Michael Lash
Lash Engineering, Inc.
1104 Cindy Carr Drive
Matthews, NC 28105
RE: Harrison Wastewater Facility
Dear Michael Lash:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httos://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
p I , !i:ih ['. 1P £T.PA I v:4 it':2'&?,3 14i'1 M'4i,.StR,ort:(-04 Tf, ± RA,;_
UFC 3Frx t.:`t? • FAX: 'T rC i lr2t
Page 42

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Harrison Wastewater Facility
July 20, 2021
NCNHDE-15170
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Freshwater Fish31429 Erimystax insignis Blotched Chub 2002-06-18 E 3-Medium Significantly G4 S2
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve ro iaeln.Data query generated on July 20,2021;source:NCNHP,Q1 April 2021.Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
'a
co
m
W
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Harrison Wastewater Facility
July 20, 2021
NCNHDE-15170
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Dragonfly or 33442 Calopteryx amata Superb Jewelwing 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S1S2
Damselfly Low Rare
Freshwater Fish31429 Erimystax insignis Blotched Chub 2002-06-18 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G4 S2
Rare
Freshwater Fish26449 Luxilus chrysocephalus Striped Shiner 1997-04-10 H? 3-Medium --- Special GS S1
Concern
Freshwater Fish11061 Polyodon spathula Paddlefish 1983 H 4-Low --- Endangered G4 SX
Vascular Plant 10619 Adlumia fungosa Climbing Fumitory 1991-07-12 D 3-Medium --- Special G4 S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant 19652 Adlumia fungosa Climbing Fumitory 1989-Pre E 3-Medium --- Special G4 S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant 7818 Berberis canadensis American Barberry 1968-05-07 H 3-Medium --- Special G3G4 S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant 21227 Celastrus scandens American Bittersweet 1956-06-07 H 4-Low --- Endangered G5 S2?
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Reems Creek Gorge R5 (General) C5 (General)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.nraa/heln.Data query generated on July 20,2021;source:NCNHP,Q1 April 2021.Please
rIsubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
d
CD
m
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-15170: Harrison Wastewater Facility
•
•
Alexander
G
W+E •
July 20,2021 1.21,137
Project Boundary o 0175 0.35 0.7 mi
� I r r r r r ,
Buffered Project Boundary o 0.275 0.55 i.i km
NHP Natural Area(NHNA) Sources:Esn,HERE r=n,Garr ,Intermap,increment P Corp,GEBCO,USGS,
FAO.NPS,NRCAN,GeoBase,IGN,Kadaster NL Ordnance Survey,Esd Japan.
MET(,Esri China(Hong Kong),(c)OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS
A User Community
Ut
Page 4 of 4

NC Natural Heritage Program
Your Order Print This Page
Quantity
Item
Unit Price
Id: NCNHDE-15170 Title: Harrison Wastewater Facility
1 Project Type: Development/Redevelopment, S100 00 USD 100.00
Residential
Total USD 100.00
This order is now complete. Transaction approved!
Here is your receipt
TRANSACTION RECORD
NC NATURAL HERITAGE FROG
121 a JONES ST
SLEIGH, NC 27E39
United States
W r W.Pi CNHF.=
TYPE: Fre-Authcrizatic.^.
ACCT: Mastercard $ 100.00 USD
CARDHOLDER NAME : Michael Lash
CARD NUMBER : ::«**i`i`*$.«tici?
DATEITIX . 20 Jul 21 1S:54:02
REFERENCE _ 001 0E39799 '•'
AUTHOR._ : O6929C
TRANS. REF. : 794
Apprcved - Thank Ycu 100
Please retain this ccpy fcr ycur reccrds.
Cardhclder will pay abcve ancunt tc
card issuer pursuant tc cardhclder
agreement.
NC Natural Heritage Program Page 46

F= r5'j'i' w '� .v .� ` V ` i r ` lyv .T P. >t v r L;
4',±,'-'','i 1 l'il"1.•. 011 '' ", -i ''" ' 4 . ',. ', ''"-''' , ' -'' .ttt, .4,
.:.*::,,c,,,f42, ir,,,,,,,iit.„
,,;.- 4)T*.;.....,,,,,i, ..... ., ,,,,4 4, ''•
i f # i:.,, 4 i , *i 11 S ;I ,, -,r r xl > f. -1 ,. 7
' -• v )� �. rye '; ,i, + r r 3 tf. 4 .; ` Y � ,ii.•'y�4-f` 4 P r,- -t;, ::,, ?1 A +'tf f w I:f ll'#ti t( , A y.
'iift+. d : i i}l'S + ', ¢ N 1 d n ya t "'"if �'` r''
xv #Y f zP d a A".- t i Y)) ,A 5 f I 1�f i 5z ti kf e•" 4 trp ,
# ! ''A� F # !rf F� ¢fi5 1f'ti % srJ G 4 r
yel
�`' ' h +'_}1� :.' r• l ,- ��,.. +#`?ly4V ' r� - I�,� t�l` ;:' `'r �, .- a ;: ,., I y..4444
y( r r
4 # vq r +# ' Y+a 4F) $ill,,f,j g {4Y4 r 1� ,`fwY�*a'" .� -. ' • t.* # i .t, 1 E.'."' f' :.,�jI .) }v „.1 9�ti; ,iii. ( ..! I ,,., 3 . r,lr.. d'►° '� ti v e,l w + �' �_<-'v Y' � -
M Y, ? 1 qq +y( ,,u r,, 4 7�(*i. Y fGi
",�' �,ii 1 }f+r �x t ,t �f T t -".f"#n '' f cr f' Y ..,� ; F ,- f t'
x� =Yfiis�.- 1i rgt,c fr, f'v� t ar-j WA'J�,y5r�`L '�Y.g! a �r1, - w' i�� .':
!' s is�t il + v�rs,fsi � a. t Y � 4� �t _ �6
. i tis+� fr f ' �1 his;"i £ E ��
y r . fir. 1.
�� y b �g e I "1 r f�
�,4��'Ai,� �k AM� 4yF ;(���� �{1 a�.� !/ y _V j "yT }I`"� �xe r t� f ,s -+� F'T s 'ry�, � sip .
��.�tr�1 ���.,� �4��,i.+� 1,�2I'Y'� *�# r�it,�,�ti �} � �� ���" r 3 „+ + P�i� �;.,, � � � �nrJ '" f
N.4 1.. ", �} t r ;ram', f.`! ' 1,b T# - 4 / t}tYrim. r
', pi }td 1 , T. , ,p fi g7�, ,, 1 ' 1 ".'r - . �"�( 44 ;, .r
to J� r i7 'lei y - ) d' d c s, f ��xi }
,,�, ;;fin ��j{�r �+?'� Sa�V� < M y�, > �y;y' k. �� r -.y, �; ' 13.
al �Vi
�+ IF
Ir 54 :4 !' , 4'i -'� i 1 v. f M 'u lq # ,v ,,,, f
t x r ) ) r ems ., „+,f{ , y 4 t Adv ki,+ t r \ E r �, -
' ° t r� +�M��#� 4"��'r# rv�r ' I�A a 1 ar'S` �} rqj yr .� ,tr_ *'f4 y ` a..iA.,-",".".,i f'sq} i..
. i'N-'
yq �t';4 � #i '+, 'tr 4 { y.
A rs `t +rr c)R , rrf�fie ,k. }g s sue
e... ..*,.,_ - , (� d-.. j i .17 4 rA #a S t �", �,r A�}4} �.j z"ryd< x)� ` ! a µ F'` \ L`r .4 1
ort-
#,' IV,
� � vt � � 1� .+. -fir s f tom"' t t v � � S�`�f� A� + " �� t sf4
.+s,.,;:- _; ��{ r < r:A,yy. Z?r � �j +t 9 ,t x `,'`^?li'� sm`�V� j .yr,• • Ott r ^r� ,
ri iii3
+ 4 + ': f�,� �# � # �, �+ d'1 .y a R r - .} {�E' 4�ItC
? iYpr
w, y r
1
,.;,_ p;�♦ w'-„ �h�� �, 7! +„` ♦yi * 'td ' � n #I 1� ', 1�� �a�^ "��. 1 of t �
J -. Ri. ., i , '. Jy�i„72i .,!? ram^" a t,�r ;', 5 rW i i" �� t � " x-;is
/ vtt1 v
°*`»" t'�' i t ,� is •
R% 4i } ! 43 �t '' r ray1� a
yy y, y} �.
t� :ar<>� r -ry� �,,y 4k I� d � ax 3,h Y v � �i. ��
4 kE .
•
r MIMI
•; r `; w i iPd+., c, g, 1 ,', , - 4t ' �fi s.a- # ,. i
' ',.3 ..; ° '4 « y x. t " „� v
N„ fw/ ( y ' $ der ; v!r ��tA xYiy
i M Eck x � e4 . - '� w�- -s
+lv° .Fi .. v a ; y. e _. ,�'tl dr . { �.E � . z' 1 y.
...,..:,.„..........„4 „.„,,,,--„,..„-_,: _: ‘,.-ft : ,:11' iri' '' .,,...' `1 ' ' 1
ibi
- s.'t+"+^a. '/✓. j ',+� `l. :) 4`�' + 'fyvl_ F.q�l..N. • ,�w»r.'.� .i <�'� 4r`" + p t i� \ j Y
J •a � ] .},�,}r��q'igfy..t+,� � ��,y?F`�,��,� '"-��y4 i V '�"'R + <� �ii `21 {�`'.y+*� ,� �, �j �j;.n �[V^i
��T iM' - ` TIt.f Y'4 I::.4".� A rt _ .h* r 1� '\. 1 l BD'�r '`'� + +
,. ay, {N r #{ 'Pi,': ,4 }. iA a`S i s 0 • Ts'' '^ , � '
/ ' t ,. 4, ,-, rail r - ,, t �YI. % .,,:t4 t� Mh.q�451,,r`k'',� } i �' ,. ` 'r '�•�-'' ! - ,i
-J r f r tv . " 1. Y t i a ,. .., r I�6f1s
h �tr Il .- _ � k �t, t i �y i ��6'tr1'r ,�r>�. �� r�,r-� �����4
a.
/� �►. ,'} �,,�ySr+t��1,'>„1",^ - a- - ;fit Iff' .'x'3q - 1 s'k
(/ l. ' °�tt"tF' " f'TFe �. * r,7Y / '�9t`
v , + t
�g •y
~� l "M'r � �er+�l . 4 _�y 4'' 'rya
Ill_-'",i�, / !' r2 ' yam° t. � �v, + yy
r I v�#�V� Ft'd "1 - - -. +,y i °- 5�t :'� v i1� Pr -�., ���„ti

E f ,�s 1 r Ir 1 ,rl :
a ' t ', -' a i� �,g; n ' (,4171. , _
7 • �' 1 i •
_ 1 t i �- �' sf %. �. �,•
f qJ ! f. l ,- F.
4., 7 -ri,jr , --IT. . .0,'
._ - - 1. 1 0, I, ,t Ski YS '�4' t
1'� f, �, r�; � 8N I
- ,t T r�
f 1 61�` 1, ,, t 911 �= , ,` 7tw, • f it!
r . • t
3 'It z.
1 i.. rrll , d
•
r i. �: / I i. it ,� i - _- , 1,.'
•
ii
1�, �.•
t
•? 4 �.
•; �`+f. -
I ; a a
�� ,ems �._
,� 4l. f ,' Iv ; , #;.fit r ,: - 7
r�
�A� 101.'." a irt� . b"
y
i (, Z- eiu 3� Via`
r� 'I , 1� .i e
'•istkill
. I § ` j� ffi 1 r# � r3 y or
4,111,
� fir I
. ri * �
4 '� l dRyr � •
t g 4 -'e
•
•',act .:� i1 S t„ -�
_LT t r. „..: • n (ryryvl . - % e
sue` 3. r' {�y,q� 5 s
< 'S'-"'., i Se#"..W }f? •- a - (his `
/ s
, ...0„. ti
� � I ,
�� f es

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette FEMA Legend
82°37'22"W 35°42'36"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
-. , Ii , 5, p Without y ti nBase Flood Elevation(BFE)
' ,, �, - Zore A.V.A99
0 w SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth Zone AE,AO,ar.FE,AR
e. ,. } may, +}+ HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway
g1� �� s
'�:.se , N 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard,Areas
�g r
Nit.'
u,, „ of 1%annual chance flood with average
‘(/ depth less than one foot or with drainage
��1, "' Av z1' Ar
areas of less than one square mile
r rt,$ It. Future Conditions 1%Annual
�� $$ +r _.' 40.-- Chance Flood Hazard zon,,,
ti `�. Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
�`% �C4 Levee.See Notea lone x
^q;� OTHER AREAS OF
^A t` FLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Risk due to Levee
RA� �� y it r NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard
' Effective LOMRs
N.. lik OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
FLOOD11�f �' pk,,wfi r ., GENERAL -—-- Channel,Culvert,or Storm Sewer
ZOf ti F JCL 111 AREA OF MINI MAL FLOOD'HAZARD STRUCTURES i l l l l l l Levee,Dike,or Floodwal(
N. �A t ZDf ie.t
� Ze Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance
`''n� ei ► �� O
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
BUNCOMBE COUNTY a CoasBase l Elect
vation
.s` ,�-- Base Flood Elv Line(BFE)
370031 t� Limit of Study
E�� �,-E Jurisdiction Boundary
"- \ ,,,, -•-- - Coastal Transect Baseline
��� 3]0Q9]2l' OTHER - — Profile Baseline
as 7
NISI
eff. 1/6/2010 FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
I &
Digital Data Available
V
T' ° 'f No Digital Data Available
17gE MAP PP ed
rr , ". If The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
• point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
r The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA.This map
I- , u. was exported on '7/2021 at 3:30 Pl and does not
v
�I�„ reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
c`
time.The NFHL and effective information may change or
», become superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
y, elements do not appear:basemap imagery,flood zone labels,
legend,scale bar,map creation date,community identifiers,
FIRM panel number,and FIRM effective date.Map images for
G 82°36'44"W 35°42'7"N
Feet 1.V 00o unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
n 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 regulatory purposes.
Basemap:USGS National Map:Orthoimagery:Data refreshed October,2020

410- r
CI C
Surface Water Classifications:
n
Stream lr-cie : 6-(54.
Stream FRENCH BROAD RIVER
!a me:k
1
Description : From a point 0.2 miles
downstream of the confluence
A of the Mills River to North
Carolina-Tennessee State Line
11 Classification : B
Date of July 31 2002
Class.:
What does More info
�' this Class.
mean?
River Basin : French Broad
Zoo c„ to . • .
— - Kas 50

NC Surface Water Classification
9
,i SITE f t .. .
g
r
_. a `. ' '.. -..
. L,,,,\, , _ k.,
6
-�
F
m 1:144,448
7/7l2021, 2:56:39 PM CD 0 1 2 4 mi
01
DWR WQ ClassificationsURLBasins River Basins I r r
0 1.5 3 6 km
FBR NCDENR - Division of Water Resources. City of Asheville, Buncombe
NCDENR Div Water Resources
City of Asheville,Buncombe County.NC.State of North Caolina DOT.Tennessee STS GIS.Ens,HERE.Garmm.USGS.NGA.EPA.USDA,NPS I NCDENR-Division of Water Resources

StreamStats https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/
Harrison Residential WW Facility - Stream Analysis
Region ID: NC
Workspace ID: NC2021 0707183858965000
Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 35.69784, -82.61425
Time: 2021-07-07 14:39:17 -0400
0 S Mars Hill G
S x r.ntithIl
Mon I r s
P I 9 ;221 '7° -_
11 Marion
0 ck Mountain ,
Cherokee
. sit, •Wayne- vlllc
c icy
G
�Spindale
Jr:t Rutherfordton
Cullowhee Farest(ity
a 74'
ast Fiat Rock
Tryon
•Landrum
7nklin
"f.. III r i 1 ,1 , .,,
GathiC
Basin Characteristics
Parameter
Code Parameter Description Value Unit 1
DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 1050 square
miles
PCTREG1 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 1 - 0 percent
Piedmont / Ridge and Valley
PCTREG2 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 2 - Blue 100 percent
Ridge
PCTREG3 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 3 - 0 percent
Sandhills
Page 52
1 of 3 7/7/2021,2:47 PM

StreamStats https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/
Parameter
Code Parameter Description Value Unit
PCTREG4 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 4 - 0 percent
Coastal Plains
PCTREG5 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 5 - Lower 0 percent
Tifton Uplands
Peak-Flow Statistics Parameters [Peak Southeast US over 1 sqmi 2009 5158]
Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit
DRNAREA Drainage Area 1050 square miles 1 9000
PCTREG1 Percent Area in Region 1 0 percent 0 100
PCTREG2 Percent Area in Region 2 100 percent 0 100
PCTREG3 Percent Area in Region 3 0 percent 0 100
PCTREG4 Percent Area in Region 4 0 percent 0 100
PCTREG5 Percent Area in Region 5 0 percent 0 100
Peak-Flow Statistics Flow Report [Peak Southeast US over 1 sqmi 2009 5158]
PII: Prediction Interval-Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval-Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction,
SE: Standard Error (other -- see report)
Statistic Value Unit PII Plu SEp
50-percent AEP flood 24700 ft^3/s 14100 43100 34.5
20-percent AEP flood 38300 ft^3/s 22100 66400 34
10-percent AEP flood 48300 ft^3/s 27400 85200 35.1
4-percent AEP flood 61 300 ft^3/s 33500 112000 37.5
2-percent AEP flood 70700 ft^3/s 37400 134000 39.6
1-percent AEP flood 82100 ft^3/s 42000 161000 41.9
0.5-percent AEP flood 91600 ft^3/s 45200 186000 44.3
0.2-percent AEP flood 106000 ft^3/s 49700 226000 47.7
Peak-Flow Statistics Citations
Weaver, J.C., Feaster, T.D., and Gotvald, A.J.,2009, Magnitude and frequency of rural floods
in the Southeastern United States, through 2006—Volume 2, North Carolina: U.S. Geological
Page 53
2 of 3 7/7/2021,2:47 PM

StreamStats https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/
Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5158, 111 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009
/5158/)
USGS Data Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated,all data,metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the
quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected.Although these data and associated
metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S.Geological Survey
(USGS),no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes,nor
on all computer systems, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
USGS Software Disclaimer:This software has been approved for release by the U.S.Geological Survey(USGS).
Although the software has been subjected to rigorous review,the USGS reserves the right to update the software as
needed pursuant to further analysis and review.No warranty,expressed or implied,is made by the USGS or the U.S.
Government as to the functionality of the software and related material nor shall the fact of release constitute any
such warranty. Furthermore,the software is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S.Government
shall be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
USGS Product Names Disclaimer:Any use of trade,firm,or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does
not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Application Version:4.5.3
StreamStats Services Version: 1.2.22
NSS Services Version:2.1.2
Page 54
3 of 3 7/7/2021,2:47 PM