20160942 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20210802

DWR
Dlrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver4.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20160942
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
'Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Chateau (Phases 7 & 8)
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Heath Caldwell
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/2/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Walker Branch
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.089-80.9800
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
r Yes r No

ID#
20160942
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
3/12/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
dick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
0. DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
File type mast be FCF
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.*
7/20/2018
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Version
2
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
52.35KB
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
*
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

2c. Contact Person:
Mark Henninger
2d.Address
Street Address
6701 Carmel Road
Address Line 2
Suite 425
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28226
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
amber. lipsky@vvetla nds-e pg. com
4. Agerrt/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Heath Caldwell
4b. Business Name:
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
4c.Address
Street Address
10612-D Providence Road
Address Line 2
PMB 550
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28277
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Slate / Province / Pagion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
Slate / Province / Ibgion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
C. Project Information and Prior Project History t^�
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(ff appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
21932394,21926112
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Walker Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
2b. Property size:
76.34
State / Province / Pegion
Country
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba

3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501030108
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is currently an active residential development with areas of forest. General land use in the vicinity consists of residential, and sparse commercial development.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2019-00107, DWR#16-0942
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.59
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
460
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Installation of culvert for access.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
The attached package includes JD materials for re -verification by the USACE (JD has expired)
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified c' Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-00107
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE JD: 04/18/2016
USACE NWP: 11/22/2016
DWR: 10/27/2016
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
This is a reverification of the site for previously permitted impacts. All installed impacts (Phases 1-6) have been verified as in compliance by WEPG. Work was not completed within the
required time under the initial authorization. Phases 7 and 8 are the final phases of construction for this development.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands r Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a. Site #* (�) 2a1 Reason M 2b. Impact type * M 2c. Type of W. 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(') area*
�V1 Culvert JP Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetland ZZ Yes Corps 0.089
(acres)

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.089
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.089
2i. Comments:
This wetland crossing impact was previously permitted in 2016. Current proposed impacts are 0.003 acres less than proposed in the 2016 application.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The site plan was designed to avoid onsite surface water features to the maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site
development and viable access. Impacts in Phase 7 have been reduced relative to the initial application by limiting the extent of necessary rip rap. No
impacts are proposed for Phase 8.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Payment previously received for proposed impacts in 2016. See attached 12/21/2016 receipt from DMS.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
r N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
W Phase II r NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Mecklenburg County
Comments:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to Mecklenburg County but will be designed to meet
their criteria.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r- Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r- Yes f• No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Final phase of construction. No additional impacts anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r- Nor NtA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater on the site vdll be carried to nearest WWTP for treatment via proposed and existing utility line infrastructure.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r- Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r- No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r- Yes r No r- Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r- Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r- No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r- Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r- Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r- Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A threatened/endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but is exempt as noted in cover letter. Report is included and has been submitted to FWS for concurrence.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r- Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r- Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r- Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
http://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/

Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one
file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
dick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docunent
Chateau Phase 7&8 PJD_PCN.pdf 22.72MB
File rrust be FOF or I M
Comments
A complete PCN package is attached. This package also includes materials required for USACE JD recertification.
Signature
F% By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request Within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Heath Caldwell
Signature
`91*q it &A&Wew
Date
8/2/2021

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2016 - 00107 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Chateau (Phase 7 & 8)
2. Work Type: Private Fv_1 Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
PJD and PCN request for residential development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]: WEPG, PLLC c/o Heath Caldwell
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW-2016-00107, DWR# 16-0942
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
35.0890,-80.9800
Hamilton Road and Smith Road, Charlotte, NC 28273
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 61a]: 21932394, 21926112, 21904102, 21904113, 21932392
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Walker Branch
12. watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:Catawba (03050103)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 �✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
U Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
Q Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Oa ks]1111161L1611%

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
August 2, 2021
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wcjoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Subiect: SAW-2016-00107; Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Pre -
Construction Notification for NWP #29 for the Chateau site (Phases 7&8) in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Messrs. Roden -Reynolds, Johnson, Wcjoski, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit #29 for Phases 7 & 8 of the Chateau site on 76.34
acres located at along Hamilton Road in Charlotte, NC. The final two phases of this project are
associated with a residential development and consists of four streams, four wetlands, and one
open water pond. Please refer to the Jurisdictional Determination Information and
Approvals/Authorizations sections for updated information on site surface waters. This site was
previously permitted in 2016 and all impacts installed for Phases 1 through 6 have been installed
as proposed. The attached package includes updated information regarding the site conditions
and proposed impacts for Phases 7 and 8 that were previously permitted but not installed within
the required timeframe.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-b Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 1
[e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
As demonstrated in the initial application, overall impacts to site surface waters associated with
the proposed development were limited through site selection location, design, and the
location/orientation of the proposed lots and access routes. Due to the location/extent of
jurisdictional surface water features on the site, complete avoidance was not practicable. Impacts
to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited through site
location, plan design and location/orientation of lots, access routes and stormwater treatment
facilities. As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed construction for Phases 7 and 8 will
include 0.089 acres of permanent impacts to Wetland ZZ for road crossing access. This access
crossings was necessary due to City connectivity requirements. Impacts in Phase 7 have been
reduced from the previous application by limiting the extent of installation of proposed riprap
required for the crossing. There are no proposed impacts in Phase 8. The applicant has
demonstrated substantial avoidance and minimization efforts in which 94% of the 1.56 acres of
onsite wetlands and 100% of the 460 linear feet onsite streams will be avoided.
To compensate for the proposed impacts in the initial application, the applicant proposed
payment to the NCDMS. All impacts, including those being currently proposed for Phases 7 and
8, were paid prior to commencement of construction in 2016. Please refer to the attached receipt.
No mitigation is proposed as part of this follow-up application.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species, or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact
me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at heath. caldwellgwetlands-epg.com.
Sincerely,
V�Cav
Heath Caldwell Len Rindner, PWS
Environmental Scientist Principal
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len. ri [e-mail]
www.wetiands-epg.com
2
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PM 283
Asheville, NC 28805

C
O
V
d
d
Q
L.
N
CL
Permit Application

w A rE�QG
T.
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Chateau (Phases 7 & 8)
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mark Henninger
3d.
Street address:
6701 Carmel Road, Suite 425
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28226
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-309-3288
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Heath Caldwell
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple parcels - see attached map
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.089 Longitude: -80.98
1c.
Property size:
76.34 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Walker Branch
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c.
River basin:
03050103 Catawba
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently an active residential development with areas of forest. General land use in the vicinity consists of residential, and sparse
commercial development.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.59
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 460
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Installation of culvert for access.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: SAW-2016-00107
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑X Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): N. Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A jurisdictional determination was issued on 4/18/2016 by D. Shaeffer. No changes to jurisdictional features have occurred outside those permitted in
the previous application for Phases 1 through 6. Please refer to the Delineation Section for updates to jurisdictional features in Phases 7 and 8.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
This is a reverification of the site for a previously permitted impacts. All installed impacts (Phases 1-6) have been verified as in compliance by WEPG.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Work was not completed within the required time under the initial authorization. Phases 7 and 8 are the final phases of construction for this
development.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.089
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.089
2h. Comments:
This wetland crossing impact was previously permitted in 2016. Current proposed impacts are 0.003 acres less than proposed in the 2016 application.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The site plan was designed to avoid onsite surface water features to the maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site
development and viable access. Impacts in Phase 7 have been reduced relative to the initial application by limiting the extent of necessary rip rap. No
impacts are proposed for Phase 8.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: Payment previously received for proposed impacts in 2016. See attached 12/21/2016 receipt from DMS.
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
> 24
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Storm
water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has
not yet been submitted to Mecklenburg
County but will be designed to meet their criteria.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Mecklenburg County
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
0 No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
[]Yes
0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
0 No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance
with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Final phase of construction. No additional impacts anticipated.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
on the site will be carried to nearest WWTP for treatment via proposed and existing utility line infrastructure.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened/endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but is exempt as noted in cover letter. Report is included and has been submitted to FWS for concurrence.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://polaris3g.meeklenburgeountync.gov/
Heath Calwell
/%� n�
08-02-2021
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Chateau
Property Address: 12420 Hamilton Road, Charlotte, NC 28273
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 21932394, 21926112, 21904102, 21904113
Select one: I am the current property owner
Name: Mark Henninger
Company: Lennar Carolinas, LLC
G?o( C.lck�tL �A Svr �y5 G/! � "Ac- 'fgwC
Mailing Address:338•Eael �s �Ivd; �hxrtette,-�'
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Property terested Buyer* /Other' Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlanc1s-epg.corn
Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550
Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277
Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
le n. rind ne r@wetlands-epg. corn

►0
Maps/Plans

,POakcrest Reparatory
.Ac-ade Rivergate
ierga,.te,
"'�IqHomeGood
t7
le4.
N
Acres: Chateau
FIGURE +/_ 76.34 Mecklenburg Co., NC
1 03112121 VICINITY MAP
Subject to USACEINCDEQ verification
/3)
Lake Wylji Carowinds
le,
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
Prepared for:
.ENNAR
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
ALL I HAC

Kohl's
r �r t
Id
`•� �. Just the Right Cruise
�.
f arch
Ye� .
Lennar at Chateau �.
P
River /at(e Elemen* y �PQo
5°
ature School 1 j
Melo Mate 8 ,, Nations Express
BOUNDARYPROJECT Expediting
Gips House 4
J
w� PHASE 7 & 8
PF
p BrA-0gy-l"gery Provided by a
4 r:R. •'
r
AC r
Preparedfor:, r
LENNAR
• • Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Drawn By: Reviewed By: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
AERIAL
` [e-mail]
Subject to USACFIIVCDEQ verification ALL HAC(704)904-2277
www.wetlands-epg.com

R LO
N
(G
U .- CN
�J �N
a mZ
4) (1 o
OU E0"
ms
UU
a
o
E �cx
f�f�lllLti1111 / = c v n g
fill�
%11 It inn a ry
► �� III 1 w E J v
Its 6
N
01 y Q 3
till a
�N
• S J

-�. r !11
II , � ,1 � � �.4 •. 1 � �y
V
_ � Ait � �� - � - - � .� _ � •1\`' ;
SITE
1.
pn
• ' . ' � '� i . Phase 7 & 8 ' . � -.
LOCATIONt�
Lat: 35.0890 2N 1
USGS QUAD
Long:-80.9800 °W FORT MILL 1996
HUC: 03050103 I
FIGURE NO. Chateau Drawn By: Reviewed By:
4 Llcnf" Union Co., NC I LRG ALL
USGS MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCOENR VERIFICATION
DATE:
03/04/2014
Updated/
Reviewed 3/12/21

_y"-•t 1 Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI
Co62 Cocil sandy day loam, 2 to 8 16-8 4-3%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeD2 Cecil sandy day loam. 8 to 15 6.1 1.6% _
percent slopes, moderately -
eroded
Oa6 Davidson sandy clay loam, 2 to 4.5 1 -1 %
8 percent slopes
- EnB Enon sandy loam. 2to 8 17.1
percent slopes 1
EnD Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 2.5 0.6% 5.
percent slopes
IrB Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 167.2 42.7% - p
porcont slopes
Mea Medkenburg line sandy loam, 73.3 18.7 iz
2 to 8 percent slopes 4y
• MeD Mecklenburg fine sandy loam. 6-0 1-5% 1
8 to 15 percent slopes
MO Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent 59.3 15.2% 1
slopes, frequently flooded
W Water 7.9 2.0%
1
.I WkB Wilkes loam. 4 [0 8 percent 19-2 4-9% k
slopes
gyp, WkD Wilkes loam. 8 to 15 percent 11-3 2-9% _
!ice - stapes
`r
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 391.3 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 391.41 100.0%
Meg y
l
ail
F, P
Cie?Wk
It I
fcolllz
1 •�
r I
Cj 1•� ; i
PHASE 7 & 8
I
- ` ! Via,
IC l F +
"­1 REr �, ,
C42 : II� PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
COW
NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript
I Mecklenburg County 1976 i,C.p
kr
Acres: Chateau Prepared for:
+/- 76.34 LEN NAR
FIGURE MecklenburgCo., NC Wetlands and Enyironritental Planning Group
5 NRCS SOIL MAP Drawn By: Reviewed By:
03/12/21 Subject to USACf/NCDEQ verification ALL HAC

ON ']iiM VHO 011 'SVNIIOHVO &NN3l
f1d31dHa :133HS
96OZ/ZO/60 31b'a IVNIONO
ez,N,„,„ OOb'CINO 2138Wf1NiO3rOdd
"� "dSl�( 1181HX3 311S a3SOdOHd 903 AO NMVdG
Jdv :,1O (1DO]HO
(E80HN) MAS ON _ _ �,,/
Ol 431NMAO HlbON �M V S
M3�MAN ONINOVNl NOIIV:)I-lddV
L rz
°� ZOZ
dp 00)
\ zaF-
a
\ wm �Om=
H W d
�a Wok \ WJ?CD
3:a� I \ 0am0
w z 1 0> J a
a 1 w 0
p O W 1 \ Z U H
p 0
V CD D / O ILJ
co O
LUO UF- a-j wLL ���� �a ) \
p � Z U /
wa
�> as
2
a
0� /W \ aM \. �NU� a
c� �w/Oo �0' LU a
a J�`` 0 V N a
�w oIL
w LL �>> z J uU <L)' CL LU
a o
° a M
H-Z\aaoa o
S W a
Y 0 O o-
w a ��, a
W d W
Of/ \ 0 Jn m o
oZ ( / v O D\co
LU �f F- z �'
¢p / w0 ��% Q
yy Q ^ 73: 0
L) p o \
1 I CD J \ z
a l
F Z 0 U) F--
WO Z WCncV
3:a <—� —_
# H IL � � U —
�z- Hg� �UW l � =2
I LU ad 0 2 O \ pQ U
�w NU2� No /
W'' J� �ao
a % 0 --
LU
N W Z ( a
O \ �y
�a zp �a
a~ o>LJ) a~ wwQ
�z �pz U�0
In O � CO R 0
O
wm wQ wm
- / J
I

ON '3iiO-N fHO OII 'SbOlS3ANI MAI
woaeioa� mmm
�0bzz0 13SVHd nV31VHO 133"S
(JM 6666EB9-1oB_Eo G
86L6E aS hF llld 6ZOZ/8Z/LO �HVG IVNIJIbO
pn1g 566E
6d8dN aA orey08b£6NO goAnN iO3PObd
°91VTD °1181HX3 31lS JNIiSIX3
,oi �sa�e,�ossvdsa aW`J 1.8 NMF1210
1vo A8 03AO3HO
(£84HN) ala0 ON -mvs
01431ND1 JO H1aON 'V1 V .7
H39wnN OND10"I NOIIVDllddd
Z�7I w
z Q
\ g��
LLJ 2i W v
\�Q � I I�II
I T � Q III
_ ~ D
C1
~-- w m
Q
gN z
``' w
f L
f�J wV)
p
I
�o
I� z Zo IJ
C-D II I Q
I�Zo
g�� � z of
�0 L— 0
J > QAI ��lp o Do
�03 �� I z a v
of N � �
a_ Of X w Q z 0
Q wY I boa
c Z g �000
wm U)mQ a
p
�z�
mop w
dLLJ Q Q Q N
II jj w Q H- (n
Q (D ; m O
— irZ5ir
/ 0 w =)
LLpcn

ON'3iiO-N fHO
wO��aelo��a� mmm
(JM 6666-E85-10G
SOL6E DS'IIIW uOj
pnlg SLbE
I bZBZ JN'""ID
.0Z -9 as
aul 's91VTD Vd53 dsl
011'SbOlS3ANI MAI
13SVHd nV3iVH:D
1181HX3 KIS 03SWOUd
(£84HN) ala0 ON
01431ND1 JO H1aON
/ v
1 J Lu
;^ f
LU
co
�\ p o co7 • VQ� ,�j W
O W 2i W
a -L o m
0 of
\ p U
> z a
go
_J
2
W
O�
\2 \
I —T
/
U
p Q
10161110
LD
wm
8 133HS
6Z07je7jzo 3iVOIVNISNO
09b£W b38Wf1N103PObd
GAS AO NMV1 10
ivo AO 03AO3HO
-mvs
H39wnN OND13"I NOIIVDllddd
II
�l
I
I
III
�C9 is I�/I Q Z� II
L
Z
�O
p �� o J
�m =m n3 ew��) I Jv} a
a � I z =10 c
� N w I J a V
ma Xy I Qz00
�z g Boa
X O / I m pw 0�
W m U) Q Q
� � m p
Z J o0
O p a
aLL,?Q
Lu
OQQ Q
L QwpC N
iI m
0 W =) 0
LLpcn

ON'3iiO-N HO OII'SOlS3ANI MAI
m
V
bbz-zoB-Eo
JM 6666E B9-10L
13SVHd nV31VHO
133"S
SOL6L DS'nF llld
6ZOZ/8Z/LO
�HVG IVNIJIbO
p119 wowapeS SLbE
bdBd�NaA o,rey�
08b£6N0
b38Wf1N 103f'Obd
°E°LD°g
�sa�e,�ossv
NVId W 10ddWl a3SdOUd
aW`J
1.8 NMF1210
,oi VIdS3\,tj
dsa
1vo
A8 03AO3HO
(£81]HN) I]IaJ ON -mvs
01431ND1 JO HlaON 'V1 V .7
H39wnN OND13"I NOIIVDllddd
J
J U 2
O Q
IILV az�
goo
mcoof
SZs \ \ �I III I li U)mo
\I IIQ II_ I �9 aDQ
\ UJ
I cl) to i '1 -tt IN \ Q w o
N (Y (n Ir
_
r _ z� 112 a _ a oW I °oU)
I�pav�Q I--, z z �
fn F- GoUW co
JY ='t I 2MII JzzW
�F-00 LU
°N
I
o
\ ^Dy �p amU W W W 0� J
dd'H ~I \ dNd LL> �z
\\ °\ SON O� daz I /
\ \ z I I
CL
.mo r
_� \ III I IIII
c
20
Q m
I
r
Q - I
9
620 �o M IIIIII1111
of �zcf)� /04
Co M �
04
Qa II � _ z`n
Q I 1/
a M�� �a
izs d d d z * M N
a I J_ I Lo
N
CD
JC0
Q
QW�
W i II 1
I
\QO 1, }w ao
� _ I
r a �'��\ _ / az =r i 11 1
Paco
z \ /o z
/ p ` �
� i I
�\ \\ \\\
631
sr y

ON '3iiO-N fHO OII 'SbOlS3ANI MAI L
woaeio��a� mmm 0
16B9-10 13SVHd nV31VHO �133"S
0M 1-
(JM 6666E oB-Eo G
86L6E aS hF llld 6mmU /LO �3iVO IVNIJIbO
pn1g 566E
6d8dN aA orey08b£6NO goAnN 103PObd
°E01o°90 INOUO3S-SSOU0 W 10ddWl a3SWOW,oi �sa�e,�ossvdsaaW`J 1.8 NMF1210
ivo A8 03AO3HO
-mvs
H39wnN OND10"I NOIld011ddd
J
Q
J U 2
Z(na
O�Q
U d �
Q Z 0
I -- Oa
-00
co of
V H Imo
W
W)
x J z �00
M V H w?Q
a w J Q
J J C Q
J J N ? zLu w
W J III irUIr
Fz aa� °on
z
cV 0 W
pH aOWW
v a = z �Z,M
00+� 0 o a 8'zz9
a�
00+0 a ss'oCs
O O a z O sz9
M wcajI-w N wJ TOM!A !A Of !A
V/ JNz A Q� A
aa CDOf w
d U
N J N p
a W wo
W zOf
a -
N
O
O O
J II w II
C) U
U U
= U_
d 2
Ir
d
U m °
J
� Q
Z w U w
O U U > U W U
0
O Q Q
m m
0 0

ON'3iiO-NfHO OII'SbOlS3ANIMAI L L
woaeioa� mmm I
0M 161-B9-10 13SVHd nV31VHO �133"S
(JM 6666EE85-60G
86L6E aS hF llld 6mmU /LO �3iVO IVNIJIbO
pn1g 566E
6d8dN aA orey09b£6NO goAnN 103PObd
°E01o°9 °3�1JOUd W l0ddWl a3SWOUd
,oi �sa�e,�ossvdsa aW`J 1.8 NMF1210
ivo A8 03AO3HO
-mvs
H39wnN OND10"I NOIld011ddd
J
Q
J U 2
Z(na
O�Q
U d �
Q Z 0
I -- Oa
-00
w of
U m ap
N J
�
J LULU z o �00
J 2 J D d w H Z
�O �`' aNwM LU
aCO ao aoJN 0>0
LU w axaU aw
xZ `� aa� NMF- -i »>
N ir(nIr
oW z �aN o?< °oU)
a 0 z d H d M W ti
I Y ml l'OZ9
£9'LZ9
��+ �' L'OZ9
J
a
00+0 m
V£Z9
M a� w N N o TOM
Cfl o L Q Cfl m Cfl
a0 Of z
=m
O
Oz N z a
O x
aU) w
w
0
.. N
O
(.0 b
J II LU II
C) U
U U
= U_
d 2
Ir
d
U m °
J
� Q
Z w U u1
O U LU U
0 U > U
O Q Q
m m
0 0

Mtb-d asuaail ON
Or62Ei
1b838WMOM NMIG
ON'31101bvHO
0ll'-SVNIIObv0- bvNN3l
woo'sajwossBdsa'AM
ss-009-1
.S144 00E_1
3�vos
aVON NOIIIINVH N
1E08ON
S3WOHNM018 3SdHdnV3.LVHO r
cl JSMG—O
6ZIMCl/90
3iva
a
lagjBO'I0Z
1181HX3 31IS JNlSIX3mvs
sajolooss4S3
00Vw1.�
lo3fObd'oul
-
.
:N38wnN JNINONI N0IIV3llddd
LL
J
O
M
Q
W
m
H
C0
H
z
W
H
H
W
H
z
I 1 1
(f8 OVN) 01 l5 ON
of O31N31i10 H1bON
� I I
Q
M
�
O
Q
W
m
H
❑
z
C0
H
z
W
~
P.
W
W
H
z
J
JV2
0
0}a
C0
W
4.
J
o
F-0a
co
200
II
co Q m
E-�
COO m 0
U
W F
z J
0
oPml
moo
r—
-
az
z a
aQQ
Q
F
0
Q W
N
fn z I j
0 W ?
M
LL ❑ fn

Or2J A8MOM NMVba ON'31101bVHO 011'SVNIl0bV0bVNN31
woo'sajwossedsa,mlmml
uEw96-009-1 .00E _ ..1 31VOs aVON NOlIIINVH
1E08Z QOJI SMGwo° 6ZOZ/E6/90 Siva S3WOHNM018 3S`dHd nV31`dHO
a°I'°la,ua°dsl+ 1181HX� �lIS a�SOdO�Id �
IlannllaUO b840Z
roul'sa�eioossy ds3 00��6E1.� �b38Wf1N 103f'Obd
mvs
N38wnN ONIMO` Ul NOIIV011dd`d
z
Z_
o
w
U
(fe lO ON d
' I�
01031NDFdO31L0 Hl>JON O
V
a
J
JV}
2
0=�
a
�Oa
�w �
mma
co co
t= z J
mop
aP:z
LM<
W J H
Q
Q W
}
M i 7 LU
m V5 >w
0 0 �
0
N
W
Q
II
_
U
W
W
.—I
o
z
M
o
NN_
W
O
o
x

O
.4—j
c�
.E
v
v
we
jurisdictional
Determination Information

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District - Regulatory Division
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
(For Jurisdictional Status and Identifying Wetlands and Other Aquatic Resources)
A. Site Details/Location:
Site Name/Number: Chateau
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel ID Number(PIN)#(s):
(Phase 7 & 8)
Acreage:76.34 Latitude*:35.0890
21932394.21926112
Property Address: Hamilton Road and Smith Road City: Charlotte
File number(s) of previous determinations associated with the site:
*Coordinates must be provided in decimal degrees ONLY.
Request Date: 08/02/2021
_Longitude*:-80.9800
State: NC Zip Code: 28273
B. Property Owner Information (if there are multiple property owners, complete an additional owner sheet)
First Name: Mark Last Name: Henninger
Company Name (if applicable): Lennar Carolinas, LLC
Address: 6701 Carmel Road, Suite 425 City: Charlotte State: NC Zip Code: 28226
Daytime Phone: [phone] Email: mark.henninger(ablennar.com
C. Requestor of Jurisdictional Determination/Delineation F71 Same as Property Owner
First Name: Mark Last Name: Henninger
Company Name (if applicable): Lennar Carolinas, LLC
Address: 6701 Carmel Road, Suite 425 City: Charlotte State: NC Zip Code: 28226
Phone: [phone] Email: mark.henninger(d_)lennar.com
D. Agent Acting on Behalf of the Requestor (must include an agent authorization signed by requestor):
First Name: Heath Last Name: Caldwell
Company Name (if applicable): Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Address: 10612-D Providence Road City: Charlotte State: NC Zip Code: 28277
Phone: [phone] Email: heath.caldwellowetlands-epg.com
Jurisdictional Determination Request for a Residential Developement
III. TYPE OF REQUEST: (check all that apply)
DApproved' Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
OPreliminary2Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)
0 I am uncertain and request and require additional information to inform my decision
Approved —An AJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, an AJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the presence or absence of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site, including their accurate location(s) and boundaries,
as well as their jurisdictional status. AJDs are valid for 5 years.
-2Preliminary — A PJD is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR 331.2. As explained in further detail in RGL 16-01, a PJD is used to indicate that this
office has identified the approximate location(s) and boundaries of wetlands and/or other aquatic resources on a site that are presumed to be subject
to regulatory jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. Unlike an AJD, a PJD does not represent a definitive, official determination that there are, or that
there are not, jurisdictional aquatic resources on a site, and does not have an expiration date.
January 2020

IV. SUPPORTING INFORMATION (agents/environmental consultants only) — please list the number and date of all
figures/maps/datasheets included in the delineation report — all sources must be properly cited on the figure/map.
Delineation Map Figure 6 (219121) FEMA/FIRM Maps
USGS Topo Figure 4 (3112121) USGS NHD
NRCS Soils Survey Figure 5 (3112121) USGS HUC
USFWS NWI Navigable waters' study
Aerial Imagery Figure 2 (3/12/21)
Wetland Datasheet (data point labels) USACE Wetland Data Formzz, Form WW (2/9/21) ; USACE Data Form Upland DP1 & Form Upland DP2 (2/9121)
Photo Log Photos 1-5 (219121)
Other sources: Vicinity Map (Figure 1, 3112121) ; Parcel Map (Figure 3, 3112/21) ; DWR Stream Form YYY & Form YYYY (2/9121)
V. AGENT/REQUESTOR CERTIFICATION (agent or requestor listed in Section 1 (C) or (D) of this request)
By signing below, I certify that the information in this document and any attached documents is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge.
f Heath Caldwell 08/02/2021
Signature Printed Name and Date
VI. LEGAL RIGHT OF ENTRY (owner listed in Section 1(B) of this request - if there are multiple property owners, complete
an additional owner sheet)
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a
jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of record or easement holder of the property identified
herein or have other legal or statutory authority to allow right -of entry onto this property.
_ — Mark Henninger 03/08/21
Signature
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
Please use the Asheville Field
Office phone contacts for the
Charlotte Regulatory Field
Office until further notice
Printed Name and Date
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
General Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD
OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
General Number: [phone]
Add Aquatic Resource Table Add Additional Owner Sheet Add Agent Authorization Sheet Validate and Submit
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project
area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made
available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved
jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the requestfor ajurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor
can a jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES WITHIN REVIEW AREA
Quantity
of
resources
Rapanos
Latitude
Longitude
in review
Geographic
Waters Type
Waters
(decimal
(decimal
area
Measurement
Cowardin
authority (i.e.,
(For AJDs
Name
degrees)
degrees)
(number)
Type
Code
404 and/or 10)
U.S. State
only)
Non -wetland
35.0844
-80.9822
130
feet
R4
404
NC
Waters YYYY
Non -wetland
35.0844
-80.9823
130
feet
R4
404
NC
Waters
Non -wetland
35.0843
-80.9821
135
feet
R5
404
NC
Waters YYY
Wetland YY
35.0845
-80.9826
0.13
acre
RP
404
NC
Non -wetland
35.0841
-80.9822
65
feet
R4
404
NC
Waters WW
Wetland Q
35.0910
-80.9797
0.02
feet
RP
404
NC
Pond 1
35.0905
-80.9802
2.34
acre
L1
404
NC
Wetland CC
35.0894
-80.9783
1.13
acre
RP
404
NC
Wetland zz
35.0897
-80.9783
0.28
acre
RP
404
NC
PrincinalPumose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to
federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a
public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),
which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a jurisdictional determination cannot be evaluated nor can a
jurisdictional determination be issued.
January 2020

w
N
C)
4
co
Ll)
i
LO
� � +'
LO
co
z
m
06
ti
v
p V • > Z
'� Q N Q-
j
o
N
n
O
X Q
w a
Q N w Z ► w
w C Q
ti Z H W V
= 06 Q
!
j�
j' II'
m J WCC
I.
I
D
n
LLI
Z
a
^ 61
o
-
v
Q
-
p w
Z Z w
06
U
n
d v
J
Ln
Ln
P
LU
N
Q
u
tip
Z o
O
`
W
a
wig
Z
Lu
-
W O
w
I y
Z
a
5 + F
LU
r w
LA
cn
m
LL
I � ,, r
-''
H
W
C � ✓` of �
f �f / C ��
H-
II
Ln
w
1
Z
.'
Z
". Q Q a
i
OC
U
.a
R •4
w
J
.
LL
<
W C
J O �LLI'
J
Z 3
W } Q
; E nu
„pq .
41
Q
W
Z m
QJ
3 rLL
_ W 0Q w LU Ll1
V w
}}
Z Q

PHOTO 1 - VIEW NON -WETLAND WATERS YYYY
DATE/TIME 2021:02:09 - 01:47:00
COORDINATES: 35.0844,-80.9822
1111E PG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
PHOTO 2 - VIEW NON -WETLAND WATERS YYY
DATE/TIME 2021:02:09 - 01:53:00
COORDINATES: 35.0843,-80.9821
Chateau Phase 7 & 8
Mecklenburg Co., INC — 2/9/21
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

PHOTO 3 - VIEW WETLAND YY
DATE/TIME 2021:02:09 - 02:08:00 COORDINATES: 35.0845,-80.9826
PHOTO 4 -VIEW WETLAND ZZ
DATE/TIME 2021:02:09 - 12:11:00 COORDINATES: 35.0897,-80.9783
Yff PG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Chateau Phase 7 & 8
Mecklenburg Co., NC— 2/9/21
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

PHOTO 5 -VIEW OPEN WATER POND 1
DATE/TIME 2021:02:09 - 12:30:00 COORDINATES: 35.0901,-80.9797
�LEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Chateau Phase 7 & 8
Mecklenburg Co., NC— 2/9/21
Leonard 5 Rindner. PLLC.

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
2/9/21 1 Evaluator: I NRN
Eastin :
-80.9822
Project:
Chateau Phase 7&8: Non -Wetland Waters YYYY
Northing:
35.0844
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
27.5
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. GeomorphologyGeornorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
13.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
8.5
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
6.0
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
2/9/21 1 Evaluator: I NRN
Eastin :
-80.9821
Project:
Chateau Phase 7&8: Non -Wetland Waters YYY
Northing:
35.0843
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
34.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. GeomorphologyGeornorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
17.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
11.0
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
6.0
. perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Chateau Phase 7 & 8 City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 2/9/21
Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wetland ZZ
Investigator(s): NRN Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0897 Long:-80.9783 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: MO: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
x Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
x Water Marks (131) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
x FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetland ZZ
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
35
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
3.
Ulmus rubra
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
45
20% of total cover:
18
OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15,
)
FACW species 65 x 2 = 130
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
Yes
FACW
FAC species 120 x 3 = 360
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
Ulmus rubra
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 200 (A) 505 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.53
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
30
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
30
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Juncus effusus
20
Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 15 Yes OBL
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
65
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
13
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Campsis radicans
15
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
15
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland ZZ
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-12 7.5YR 4/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
12-20 7.5YR 4/1 50 7.5YR 4/6 50 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox(S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Chateau Phase 7 & 8 City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 2/9/21
Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Investigator(s): NRN Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0896 Long:-80.9786 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: MO: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
MUJV I IC
LIVI I III ICI II
II IU I OQ0.11
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Ulmus alata
40
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Nyssa sylvatica
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Juniperus virginiana
20
Yes
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 45.5% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
100
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15,
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species 130 x 4 = 520
3.
Ulmus alata
10
Yes
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Nyssa sylvatica
10
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: 210 (A) 760 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.62
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
50
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
20
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Allium vineale
10
Yes
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Lonicera japonica
30
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
30
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-20 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Chateau Phase 7 & 8 City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 2/9/21
Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wetland YY
Investigator(s): NRN Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0845 Long:-80.9826 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: MO: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
x Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
x High Water Table (A2) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
x Water Marks (131) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
x FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetland YY
Absolute Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
35 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15,
)
FACW species 70 x 2 = 140
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20 Yes
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10 Yes
FACW
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 200 (A) 490 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.45
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
30 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
55 Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Juncus effusus
25 Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex crinita 20 Yes OBL
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland YY
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 7.5YR 5/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Chateau Phase 7 & 8 City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 2/9/21
Applicant/Owner: Lennar Carolinas, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Upland DP2
Investigator(s): NRN Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0844 Long:-80.9826 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: MO: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Ulmus alata
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, )
1. Elaeagnus angustifolia
2. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 28
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Allium vineale
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Uominant
Indicatc
% Cover
Species?
Status
35
Yes
FACU
35
Yes
FAC
20
Yes
FACU
90 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
35 Yes FACU
20 Yes FACU
55 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 11
30 Yes FAC
10 Yes FACU
40 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 8
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28.6% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
FACU species 120 x 4 = 480
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 185 (A) 675 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.65
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Upland DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-20 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

u
a
m m
7 O
N
O`
C
O
0
O
U
E
p N
CD
L
m
N
O
ai
L
c
O
� rl
O N
Q O
N
N
N
N
M
�
R
O
C
O
U
CO
R
6
y
NN
�
c
o
Z
0
Z
0
N
c
a '
v
L O
N
L
Ol
N
O
--I
O
C N
0 O
N
C
7t
7t
T
�o
m
M
O
ri
N
O
O
u O
N N
O O _
u o
N M N
O
M
> O
O N
O O elf
c
ti ti O
T N N N
❑ N N N
O
m
0
V N
Q NN
O T w C
O O m o7 w O
O
Ln
N �
6 O N
O N 10 m >
dl N w y
O O Ln
N �
m
110
I N
Q ON
11) N ^ u -
u
❑ c co
o x m
v
o R , O
U W 2
N �
O N L
�O Q
N O`
^
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
�
a
v
C
a
>
10
O
O
�
Z
>
10
Q
h
u1
ri
h
dt
O]
N
N
iT
a)
Q
l0
N
In
In
m
C
O
M
m
r7
N
O
N
Cl
C1
O
C0
N
>
rl
rl
N
I�
N
r-I
N
w
E
O
D
T
N
O
T
u
u
�
c
i
`
Ql
r-I
O7
01
O1
Ql
>
N
W
u)
ul
N
01
tD
�!I
rl
O
7
N
T
C
O
Qt
O
O1
O
!
C+
O
W
O
U
r
r-I
M
In
C
01
.--I
I�
c
l0
T
O
O
O
O
O
cl
cl
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
Z
a
Z
Z
U,
a
Z
z
�
N
ri
�
Q
U
❑
co
J
a
Y
a
O
W
=
N
V
❑
m
m h t0 ul 7 M N rl O
(S@gDUI) 112JU1pNd

a- J
i
O
Q
v
oC
22
Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: CHATEAU Phase 7 & 8
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
Field investigation conducted May 3, 2021
Charlotte Office: www.wetiands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550
Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277
Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. co m

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Chateau Phase 7 & 8 property (formerly called Elisha Property part of The
Chateau) is located just north of Hamilton Road, east of Steele Creek Road, and
just northwest of the South Carolina state line in Charlotte, North Carolina. It can
be found on the Fort Mill USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is
35.0866 N, longitude is 80.9809 W. The topography consists of upland flats
grading into gentle to moderate slopes, streams and small ponds with the
elevation ranging from 620 to 660 ft. (Figures 1 - 4).
Figure 1:
1
rl
�L}
-T-` PROPERTY BOUNDARY J-
�,� STUDY LIMITS' F
76.34+/-AC
LOCATION
Lat: 35.0866 2N U161 QUAD ..
Long:-80.98092W FORT MILL
H U C: 03050103
FIGURE NO.
1
Chateau Phase 7 & 8
Mecklenburg Co., NC
USGS MAP
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
ERG LSR
DATE:
05/03/2021
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
2
Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ was
referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and
Protected species for Mecklenburg County North Carolina, the results of which
are listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and
the site was investigated on May 3, 2021.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Mecklenburg County
County: Mecklenburg, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on May 3, 2021
Group Name Status Record Status
Invertebrate Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona Endangered Current
decorata
Invertebrate Rusty -patched Bumble Bee Endangered Historic
(Bombus affinis)
Vascular Plants Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea Endangered
laevi ata
Vascular Plants Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus Endangered
schweinitzii)
Vascular Plants Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii) Endangered
Vertebrate Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis
septentrionalis)
Vertebrate Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus)
Threatened
Current
Current
Current
Probable/Potential
Protected under the Bald Current
and Golden Eagle
Protection Act
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
Three plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally Endangered,
is typically found in open habitats which historically have been maintained by
wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most occurrences are limited to
roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility rights -of -way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clear cuts, dry
limestone bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring abundant sunlight and
little competition from other plant species.
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered, requires
habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species requires periodic fire
as a part of its ecology.
Four animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of open water
such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are suitable fish
populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
• Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable, silt- free stream beds
are required for this species. Typically stable areas occur where the stream
banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally Threatened.
During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath
bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non -
reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. It
has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds. Northern
long-eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Rusty -patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis), listed as Federally Endangered,
live in colonies that include a single queen and female workers. Rusty -patched
Bumble Bees historically occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies. Bumble
bees need areas that provide nectar and pollen from flowers, nesting sites
(underground and abandoned rodent cavities or clumps of grasses), and
overwintering sites for hibernating queens (undisturbed soil).
WEPG#00054 4
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
RESULTS:
This site is covered with a mosaic of planted young Loblolly Pines (Pinus taeda),
and the remainder is a fragmented mix of old fencerows, dirt roads, ponds,
timbered woodlots, and disturbed woodlands and scrub/shrub thickets. There
are mixed hardwood buffers along the drainages and creeks. Roadside habitat
borders the property edges along Hamilton Road and Smith Boyd Road.
Some areas were being actively timbered at the time of investigation. Trees
present include Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata), Loblolly Pine (P. taeda), Virginia
Pine (P. virginiana), White Oak (Quercus a/ba), Black Oak (Q. ve/utina), Red Oak
(Q. rubra), Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis), Sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), Hackberry (Ce/tis /aevigata), and Green Ash (Fraxinus pensy/vanica).
Subcanopy tree species include Red Maple (Acerrubrum), Sourwood
(Oxydendrum arboreum), Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica), Ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana), Winged Elm (U/mus a/ata), Redbud (Cercis canadensis), Flowering
Dogwood (Corpus f/orida), and Black Cherry (Prunus serotina). The shrub layer
includes Strawberry Bush (Euonymus americanus), Blueberry (Vaccinium sp.),
Russian Olive (E/aeagnus umbellate) and Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Vines present are Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Japanese Honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica), Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Crossvine
(Bignonia capreo/ata), and Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia). The herb layer
includes Christmas Fern (Po/ystichum acrostichoides), Spotted Wintergreen
(Chimaphila maculata), Bedstraw (Galium sp.), and Japanese Stiltgrass
(Microstegium vimineum).
The roadsides have Fescue (Festuca sp.) shoulders and ditches that are
periodically mowed. The narrow ecotone at the woods and fencerow edges are
made up of Serecia (Lespedeza cuneata), Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus),
Dog fennel (Eupatorium spp.), Goldenrod (Solidago spp.), Blackberry (Rubus
spp.), and Multiflora rose (Rosa mu/tif/ora).
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower along the roadsides, utility
rights -of -way, transitional areas and woods edges were examined, and the
species was not observed. WEPG concludes Schweinitz's Sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii) does not occur on the site.
All potential habitats for Smooth Coneflower along the roadsides, utility
rights -of -way, transitional areas and woods edges were examined, and the
species was not observed. WEPG concludes Smooth Coneflower
(Echinacea /aevigata) does not occur on the site.
WEPG400054
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
All potential habitats for Michaux's Sumac along the roadsides, utility
rights -of -way, transitional areas and woods edges were examined, and the
species was not observed. WEPG concludes Michaux's Sumac (Rhus
michauxii) does not occur on the site.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed. WEPG concludes Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus leucoceohalus) does not occur on the site.
The on -site streams do not have the habitat characteristics required to
support populations of the Carolina Heelsplitter. Based on existing
documentation, Carolina Heelsplitter populations have not been identified
within this basin. No individuals were observed during the survey nor
would any be expected on -site. WEPG concludes Carolina Heelsplitter
(Lasmigona decorata) does not occur on the site.
Comparing this site location to the USFWS Range Map for Rusty -patched
Bumble Bee
(https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/rpbbmap.html)
Mecklenburg County is in its Historic Range, and as such, Section 7
consultation is not needed. WEPG concludes Rusty -patched Bumble Bee
(Bombus affinis) does not occur on the site.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http-//www.fws.gov/asheville/htm Is/project_review/N LE B_in_WNC. htm I)
WEPG concludes the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no
further action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the
Northern Long-eared Bat.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
04z,el # 1*e�l
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
May 3, 2021
6
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist/ Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Discovered Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
which led to the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant
Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has
become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 55,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in both
North and South Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 2: VICINTIY MAP
F'W
'+a J
YORKSHIRE
.—"qe
CATAWBA VILLAGE
LAUREL
MEADOW
FAIR OAKS
GRINGLEY ON
THE HILL
CAROLAND ACRES
QUAIL RIDGE
HADDONFIELD POR,
HAMILTON PLACE
t-, Cn;' '.ffa YI
all
MELE
Bi
FIGURE NO.
2
CHATEAU 7 & 8
Mecklenburg Co., NC
VICINITY MAP
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
LRG LSR
DATE:
05/03/21
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
F'.

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 3: AERIAL MAP
FIGURE NO.
Chateau Phase 7 & 8
Mecklenburg Co., NC
AERIAL MAP
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
ERG LSR
DATE:
05/3/2021
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
9
Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.

Chateau Phase 7 & 8 - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 4: NRCS SOIL MAP
SITE
N
L' ft
FIGURE No.
4
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit
Acres Percent
symbol
Map Unit Name
in A01 of AOI
Ce82
Ceci.i sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
10.1 8.1%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to
&9 5.5%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
DaB
Davidson sandy clay loam, 2
1.9 1.5%
to 8 percent slopes
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8
73.3 18.6%
percent slopes
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15
1.8 1.5%
percent slopes
IrB
Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to
22.3 17.7%
8 percent slopes
MeB
Mecklenburg fine sandy
35.9 28.6%
loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
MeD
Mecklenburg fine sandy
0.0 0.0%
loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2
12.3 9.8%
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
W
Water
9.3 7.4%
WkD
Wilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent
1.8 1.4%
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 125.7 100.0%
Chateau Phase 7 & 8
Mecklenburg Co., NC
SOILS MAP
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
LRG I LSR
DATE:
05/03/21
WEPG#00054 10
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

EN
Approvals /
Authorizations

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2016-00107 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -FORT MILL
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Lennar Carolinas, LLC
Thomas Johnson
Address: 11230 Carmel Commons Blvd
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28226
Telephone Number: 704-309-3288
E-mail: thomas.iohnson(&Iennar.com
Size (acres) 387.2 Nearest Town Charlotte
Nearest Waterway Waterway River Basin Catawba
USGS HUC 03050103 Coordinates Latitude: 35.0958
Longitude:-80.9794
Location description: The project area is located at 12420 Hamilton Road. PINS: 21932394, 21926112, 21904102, 21904113 and
21932392.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the placement of fill material in 0.188 acre of wetlands and
198 linear feet of stream to facilitate the construction of a single-familv residential develonment. Proiect imnacts would include
the loss of 147 linear feet of stream associated with the installation of a culvert, the loss of 0.175 acre of wetlands for the
grading of residential lots and the installation of culverts, and temnorary imnacts to 0.013 acre of wetlands and 51 linear feet
of stream associated with the installation of sewer lines.
Applicable Law(s): ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide/General Permit Number: Nationwide Permit 29. Residential Developments
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated 9/23/2016, and the enclosed plans Sheets 1-19 dated 9/2/2016. Any violation of the
attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order,
a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements. For activities
occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning
work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact David L. Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or david.l.shaeffer(a)usace.army.mil.
Digitally signetl by SHAEFFEP.DAVID.LEIGH.1260)505)3
UN:c US,-S. Government,owDOD, ao Roo=USA,
-HAEFFEH.DAVIDIEIGH.12fi0)505)3
Corps Regulatory Official:LL—Date:XH5.,,.2II:520-05.D�. Date: 11/22/2016
Expiration Date of Verification: 3/18/2017

SAW-2016-00107
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ There are waters, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33
USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you
may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Please note, if
work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an approved JD, the appeal must
be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any work in waters of the United States
and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ❑ There are waters, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination
may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ® The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued 4/18/2016. Action ID: SAW-2016-00107.
Basis For Determination: See the previously issued preliminary or approved jurisdictional
determination form dated 4/18/2016.
Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdiction determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdiction determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Digitally sig ed by SHAEFFER.DAVID.L GH.1260750573
DH:c=UE FER. AVID.LmGH.126u=DOD, ou-PKl, ou-USA,
cn=$HAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2016.11.22 12:36.40 -05'00'
David L. Shaeffer
Date of JD: 4/18/2016
Expiration Date of JD: See previously issued JD

SAW-2016-00107
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Grout)
Amanda Jones
Address: 1070 Tunnel Road, Building 1, Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, North Carolina, 28805
Telephone Number: 828-708-7059
E-mail: amanda.ionesnwetlands-et)g.com

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
a. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in accordance
with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility
Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby
incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization.

Action ID Number: SAW-2016-00107 County: Mecklenburg
Permittee: Lennar Carolinas, LLC, Thomas Johnson
Project Name: Chateau Residential Subdivision
Date Verification Issued: 11/22/2016
Project Manager: David L. Shaeffer
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Asheville Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

g
2
z
C /
a
M d
u
cii
bb
iz
} �
��
\ ƒ
\ }
{
E
-
■
CL
k
-
|
§
-
Wiz- - 2=■
..��- f�\ k ¢cs
� ��■� ` �� �°
-
. ;§ ■a§ ��2
� :
°J
2■
}\
§2 ,
¥a 2�
\�
k�
�§
k°
�.
o|
k\
�j
;
-...
; @
§�
§j
■S
■a
Ul

ON'3I I0lklVHO 011'S'dNfINVO MN31
� � � V
m
to a.t-wr De
Ro-6-i.]F.AR
V31 H 3
���$
960ZIM
�31VO WNIM'80
P49dsl#
1 ■
00YUN3
1139pinN i33rONd
5 ,
IISIHX3 311S JNI1SIX3
903
A9nm"ia
Ocfv
:AS 03A'33HO
(ceavN) d1a9 ON I Y - - -M►dS
_
Ol MiNEIMO HWdON G
g g
M913 nrW JNIMDV- JL N0IJLV3l lddH
77
J
fYa
002
LU
z VC
<
as
`�
g
J=�
W m
� �
ujmLU
W v4rn�
W
Z �
(al Z
0Q
w
0.
{IL
a l
g N
vs a❑
LLaIL-i
❑ N
a
d'
m
Q ' Z
p
I
�m w g Q
LLJ�a 0 a ~�
J �
Z
Q 2 w Q 1 ,
❑rn Ix in ww
� � era IL m ��
Q z �{v- S r
! 19
v❑im mm_ g �� z a w
��a�s i�� g z S d
w 0 t g z z m
o r a a
w l
❑ 3 c o Q
x x & x
LU a H
IY- m x
Q Q 4 w L W O
w "� �
a N
�- w g °x o
3 g Z g x -_
�u Q
CL 0 �aa z
❑g _j�
Ir
1N_S' �x Pa i g z
� aw
om g g ��z �0 35niw~Wrg Al�. a z=a° Lj °a om
IL
a a rk O �j
x z a ❑ ��
w I
w ruu' it as
Y �O axa ZH
0. Q U) 7 F a
❑ x❑ ww
5i0 wm a
of �+

ON '311018VHD Z)ll'$"IIOHVD t"Ul
� . z nV31dHO dO Z :J.33HS
%��svh ml nozzom :31VO-NNIONO
vve �r.'uxsl
y OOIf EM I3WA i33rO'dd
118IHX3 311S C13S0d0Hd 933 'A9 NM G
:]db ,A9 (AN09HO
(CKVN) LIME) ON
01 d31N3R10 HiaON a34W fCN JNIND"I NQI.LV31 ddV
as INC
x�w
�0 � wm �fl�s
EU a
J
x� 3d , oayo
a t
OW 1 r �x 0
- �t �c�roa
m? LU wr*
'Lu
0 LLa-j
w a (o ! o
a
NW �� ❑ z m
wU aJ u'�a �i 3a , r
li
go A
U) wQ �q
7
Ir as
=m w� �
N tW W Oo �UU I 5 0
a
0Qa
U- -'n vF ix2LL- w
Ua ate, a-v,
w - Q a :E r /
U r. � w
m
N �+ 1
w
¢C3 a wa o
[� U o
a
o�
�2 D J
1 0 z ¢
W _ U
l 0: WN o
�LU 0)$ D
d4
0 `"
W z d
0
�a zp �a
EL 7 a
EL ED a¢
U) Z) ~ to r~n m
p V' w WM 'uj W°m
f ��

1
2
y
a
n
a 0-
a r y
m n�Ca C
i
N
G
A I
�NL�C
Oamn
r
o0aa /
C) M
�carn �
az3
ca 1
a m 0
z ❑ D
O r
z_<
C i
LJe
nm
n­1
_ r-
3a
vz
av
�i
-----------------
1
NORTH ORIENTED
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER NCGRID (NAD83) TO
SAW----.
CHECKED BY: MPG
DRAWN BY: ECB PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT #'I "�:;.:`u"`
PROJECT NUMBER: CN13.400
ORIGINAL DATE: OAIQ2J2016 _ k•,l. ' 7fF
SHEET CHATEAU .4V:`F, I 1
3 OF 19 LENNARCAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE, NCI+ESP •­ 11,11":

i
� _ y
/ � l
{ � {
�l- ll
l m 1
z
w z
--� en ,
o
l
z m
cm � --
� >>-
0 ' m nD-- 1
�1
a 0
� r �
r
vxm0
�CNriz0 ✓r {
o> m a
C1
oyao 1
> > ` \
�m=7°
Pa
ato10 �.
Q
v0
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER
SAW- - -
CHECKED BY;
APG
DRAWN BY:
ECB
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT #2
LW
o"n +. pan a-mv""
PROJECT NUMBER:
CN13.4U0
CU01—K M"
ORIGINAL DATE:
O9f4M16
CHATEAU
LENNAR CAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE, NC
9R: L�LvroN 6 d
F- .Mwt-'. I
ESP-9�
SHEET: 4 OF
'I

ON '3LLOlkNHO 011'S't+NIIONV'O MN31
T0W f1d31dH3 6 � J ! 9 :133H9
�•,Ao OO4
v d cnn �sv �i EM w39wnN IOAM ld
� vdsli# NVId C# 13ddWl (]3SndOSd
9O3 d9 NM�d210
OdH A8 03NDO HD
-mvs
a39WnN JNI} WHi NDIIVDllddV
W z
I I 1
4z z�c
pLudK
xQ�
H D� `a a �' �� W Q7�
IL m
AL
LL. go
OO _
FL LL
NICHOLS HALL DRIVE 1 \ a Lu °
[PRaP. W PUBLIC R
0a
11M1ff 1
F i
_ \ 1
io
io4K 1
r r Vo
� I 1 0
1X am S1�7 1 f i-0Ni�
1 I IL w f l ►moo Ua~0 LA i
no
a ` 1
Vt
o
.70
La
x
U

d
624.74
624.4
625.45
NONE OMNI on MENOMONEE
MEMO OEM mm nommoom
622.0
621,41,
WEEMENWEEMENEEMEN
moommoom OMEN
MMME
628-4
PROPOSED IMPACT #3 CROSS-SECTION
r
CHATEAU
CAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE,NC

1 1
i:yl •.
■■■■■■■■■■
LIB■�■��■■■�;ii
■■■■■■■��!■fin■■■■■■
■
_' Eli'
' .
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■

ON'31ICINVHO 011'MIIOWOWNN31
U
JO 6
I1V31VH3
. L33HS
��
dSlt+
I
9LGzfmm
31dq 7VNIJINO
00VEM
:Zoev f1N L33PONd
Nbld V# 13VdWI 03SOdOSd
903
A6 NMiRf4
Y�
1t
l �
y
.-,
-
.....
a us
4
a
..
:E 0
aixL a -a�
�z
�x
go
pV� Jaa
Ix90
-
�,m
rya
_te a
ILOJ� WSJ
m �
wLu
1
,�
�.0
IL
aIl
WCL
19oL
IA
Al
I
a
a
Uav -A8 U3NJ3HJ
-Mb'S
u3swnN JNIN3"l NOl1d31lddd
II = f19 N �W ❑ m
CL lcz
aae�
l -
II/I
xJ a
II
�• 2.-.
II 0
'
Z++1 Q= a
1
GL ❑
Wa a
LL
❑a
V W ;
_.a❑�
a0
�f
2a
IL
a
�[ a
zg�
ar❑
J

1
it
11
.
i 1
i
w •
•
CHATEAU
CAROLINAS, LLC
CHARLOTTE,

4 00 to Q
583.8 Cif CD Q v O+DD
583.75
v, 584.6
584.57 " _ G)
m a
v
m
585.7 1 +00
585.71
SEE-
7
IF
A
- a 585.9
585.87 11r
axm0
�nxw 585.8 1{'86
c n 586.78 r O m Za ❑_
0cc*> m>�
�' a
w
n<am a �N �X
=Mp3 N0
�nzwZ
1
gym_
nmG7
z ❑ ❑
Q ❑ z
x�
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER
SAW- - -
CHECKED BY: APG
DRAWN BY: ECB PROPOSED IMPACT #4 CULVERT PROFILE `" �`"`"""
PQ Ba l0.3o
PROJECT NUMBER: CN13.400 m""MNC="
Mr,Ldem'.r BFE
SHEET ORIGINAL DATE: 091021201B CHATEAU 7 * SC vm
110
� 1 OF '19 �'"�'
LENNAR CAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE, NC —

rvv-
L<0
>
m a oG
HoEn
y r <
o w > o
C7S—rm
>m�m
�nz3
>WG7
v
�0�
z�
0 Ln Lit CD
4 ov to 0
..
■
■■■■■La■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■
"7v-
0,
!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■
586.8
NEW
:.
..
`=W
s=
■■■■
■
■■■■■I■■■■■111i■■!J
l"'11�s•������1��_
■
■
.
■■■■
■■■■■■ll■
■■■■■lll�■!,V■RJ
■
■■■■■■■■■■■■1'1�■■■■■■■11■■Eii■■■■
■■■■■■w"
■
■��i!■■■■■■■��MERM■■■■
,,
::.
nnnnnna,�ir■nnnnnnnnnn■itnnnnnnnn
ov. uv r
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER
SAW- - -
m
rr�
ti
ao
0+00
1+00
1 +76
CHECKER BY:
All
ECa
PROPOSED IMPACT #4 EMBANKMENT PROFILE
"�°"'°�"" rn. a- zavo
C6.kMIC2MI
FW v.X�
ESP-�
DRAWN BY;
PROJECT NUMBER:
CN13ADO
ORIGINAL DATE:
09I0212016
CHATEAU
LENNAR CAROLINAS. LLC CHARLOTTE, NC
SHEET:1
12 OF 19

ON`310I8VH0 OIVtlNIl01d� WNN31
6 �
dO VANS
r"
nd31VH3
ma,x• -,
(4
noulQw
:BiVQ 71MISIHO
V-WUKdsl
4D UNO
ijaivinN13YOW
N►dld ONISSO113 CIVOkl l3VdWl ON 03SOdOlJd
1333
As NMdaa
0dv
:J.g a3H03H0
-
- -mvs
a39WnN JND3"I NOIIVO[IddH
c�
a
i
vzo
C �x
_ aim
W
1 O
J O �
W
1
nl"W
y Q'
W
W :: .: oaf
..•-ace.. - IxWin 7
�om°�
r
IL
'r I
J
0 Y
a m O
z
O a
D
I p
z l-
0�
Z W
Z
N Q
wL)
,s yy
10 AP
1
T /
� f W ° 7s
,ate ❑ � � . � .
En
LU
o�
L)
J
J �
6
� � N
J �
Umot: (mo
n
Z W C'VLLJ CD
W p-
-jo
°La
ow
Za(
Z2,0
C Y
ad
LU
a. j � R'
W
L7�J4 °
a
F
0

nd3idH3 �3
r 9twjz BR :31VOIMIEND
w18 'a+u'nl �N
001r'£1,143 i3evinN.lONOW
n" I wm N3d0 113M35 AHVIINVS ❑ OdOad
903 a9 NMFIlfQ
Ddv :A8 fl3KOHO
- - -Md5
aaawnN 9NIN3V-d1 NgI1► 3I1dd►d
— RHODES HALL DRIVE
(PROP. 65' PUBLIC RNV)
2 p
r
7;r
G
pox
11
� J�Z
H WCL
�
I�
�iii•'
\ p�
1
R'
a. ::1co
:.°
v�ra
f€
N
N W�
N
Na
y
IN
a°
1
�y
tn
a
1
1
V�o
��
J
N
�Lu
n
Z
IL
�d
C
p
e
` o�
_
�u
19IL
CL
p
1
1
a `
x_a
—777
9Li
a
Co,
w
ul
3 !�cb
J
x
tu
o
a
LL
-'LL
g
Sao oca . �g uo ��,�� �i
—�Eh WOO � � �do / _ 0.7 � m
CL
IL W F 0 D
En
o-p omm X
rawLLI
a��
Faze
U7 . i
[] LLI
U W
x AWN lV3�-CL

tn,onz-we-aw
vve+rn:e+,:dsl
ocor +ae n d
1 .1 ui4.xwcy �ti.l
OQ+t
00+£
00+z
05+I
ON'; I I 018VHO 0 ill 'S'VNIIQbtl� Zlb`IJN3l �a � JO 9 �.
n�d31dH� 133H5
9LOZlLOl60 31vo l'VNIOWO
N01133S-SSONO DOVEW !N39wf1N i33rGdd
903 A9 NMI G
6# 1f1O NUO a3M3S Aatl1INdS 03SOdONd wv :Aa (13ND3HO
-mvs
$ a38wm JNl)Iadal NOIIVDllddV
r
Z d ❑
❑ Z
Q
Z � H
s Q
0 a
F^ Q7 ELa z a-io)0
a.
w p
Wa
o 0m n7)�wa�
Loyz LLoa-j
L) —
■■■■■■m■■
■■■■
■■■
■■r■■
: .
■■■
■■■■■■�■_■■■■■
■■N■■
■■■■■■r`�
■■■Ii■■■■
■■C■■■
, .
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MEMO■■
■■■
■■■■■■■■i
■■
Orr■■■
■■■
■■
■■■■■■
■■i■■■■
■■
---■■■■■
■NNAP'
A
■
■■
'
■OW22t■
y■■
,
■■
■■l�4mg■■
MEMNON■I�
v■■■■■ 1■■
■■
'
■■■■�■■■■Ili■■■■■■■■
�
■■
■■■■H■■■K■■■■■■■■■
■
■■

ON'31COldVHO 011'SHNI106VOlbNN3l �� 4133HS
`` nV31VHD
Z* 0) i
Lax nn�e nowom :3M IVNIE)INO
oov'£LNO t138Wf1H 103f0Zld
dSJj#lz# im NUO 113M3S AIIb1INdS a3SOd011d
903 :A8 NMVt10
odv :A8 (13)103H0
.M►s
Nltl�
mass N JNINO"l NOI1►d31'lddV
Z J
oui
�_
az
�a
a=
J U
�
w 7e lz
_�
Boa
m U
a 4
"o
- '
a z
I'Ll
P7 Ca
J a 0 _
0
z z
.Lng^
jx IX W F � v _
rL
H
d
L
x
w
% M I
EPSON-
IDS
gSMftal %C; 9"
►ri [pR°
�I
0
a
0
a
w4� ��
x
i 0
�u
CL
aw
OJ
VS
� �SS-55
! — 55,
~ W
J
2 x
I I LLLL � -
I I 0o
0>
a rr
a --
a
a _-
0
IL
O
a ran
CO 0
1J taa
��-Z
/ tea=
-J rn
} Z
0
°Wa
zmqc
=xe
2F�u3:
LU
iL
0-CW51 O
�iCL
J
acZnfj�
w}a
LLaa-i
O
r
Lu0rn
rn
W Z
19x0
i X 0
~rn
ac�z
yr0
way
!Z'aJ
ORO
0m7
pz0
U
Z
U
W h
U~
N a
r

a
z
en
m
mm
mM
n❑
❑:9
rn
�❑
�z
0
X
m
C) 4 m co
581.1 Ln C) — — — — — — Q
LD
0+00
■■■■
0
�.■.■■MI'
Iilr.T._
. ,.
:.
..■■
■
■■■■
s
"it
'
L 'UMMEN■■MN
MwwwMMo�Aww
wommu
ommim
■■■
0
MENEM
o"Molmomm
[MH#27]
4
00
u i y v a G) r� I STA:0+75.84
o r m -+ x v RIM=585.03
Ln CD
m m � r cn 0U- _< INV. IN=573.24 (MH #28)
� v � z m m 7D INV. OUT=573.04
m
mammr --
0 m u m
=aa -,
�_
�- -
mm
i
p z m Q O
O
> �N0 O Z o
nzc a
-1
-, Cro VCM ra%-m��m
< a z � o
�OW-
>w
o zo
p z
z
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER A
SAW-
CHECKED BY: APG PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER OPEN CUT #2
DRAWN BY: EC8 ` Pau-M `"
CROSS-SECTION `" Nc2
PROJECT NUMBER: CN13.400 °�'°^� "� �"
ORIGINAL DATE: 0910212016 R"'"
SHEET: CHATEAU
17 OF 19 ILENNAR CAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE, NC N rn

0N'3J1018VHO 0ll'S"dNIINVOWNN3l � Y JO 8
nv3 iVH O 133H5
'°'a'�"'� a' 860Z1i0160 31tlQTdNIJl�iO
PY9�SpC
+ � 00tUN0 -d3flNnN 103rO'dd
vddSJ £# lnO N3dO N3M3S ANVIINvs 03SOdON 803 ,kilW�o
JdH ,kS 03A03H0
-MVS
N313wnN JNNOV81 NOIIVDllddV
z�
a W
z
z
•0
I �
w�
•[L.W
x ul
1 ,in-
LO
�p0 �
0 �� �- -
F `
_
/
MQ
¢
`M0
a
Te
a LU
t
-
. D W
'NMS—�
— •NVS ISD ` ---
-
by
�4SLLI
LLI
z'LLJ 0.
z
Q LJn
IrN
> 0a�Z)
LLF�grL7
�o� +QzD
o
w p�Z m a
d G j
f
a
L
fL
0�
acr-
Q
wm i
f
LL
0
� jr >-
ago
W 0
�
0 0 -�
0)
Boa
W
mZZ
Jy�
.JJ=U
¢i]z
Q tn
y¢0. W
yo 1
D
0 m 5 '
0
dt
a�'u�,
Ix
a N
�zx
aJ
w 0
W
0 v
uJ
U
U uJ
z rHH
ci�a
^O I1 J a0j �W aF
a a0
W w
a C
V) Q
' x
w
� L
1 N
/ z
1 Q
y
IL
0
IL
W
l� m❑�
1 W W a
t- F- ir1
Z tl] Q
r QaM
La U a,
�\ I -N rr-�L��
�z
0W7
z¢Q
r m F
�a>z
W Q U>i Q
U < N a
W 0
Q
[7F
7F,ir
a
oul=P

a
z
m
mm
v;o
00
07
r- 0
r 0
a
�o x
n Ln
d7 m y 0000
576.7 m---------
0+00
MEN
p+72
a NO EMMEMEMEMEM
ono
w y v N STA:0+72.43
@ v+ � , m � RIM=579.70
c cn m tn m r INV. IN=570.70
Q1 a z -n INV. OUT=570.50
o fl ce
marnm
o m u r
0 Aj
rvv�+ m m
15sm❑ z�
r���o 0 0
_10ZIA v z
a ,—o w
c n m a
> >M m
� a Z � o
ayc'
z 0 0
�0�
z�
i
APPLICATION TRACKING NUMBER
SAW- - - c
CHECKER BY: APG PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER OPEN CUT #3
DRAWN BY: ECB ` "'l'.x�""
PROJECTNUMBER. CN13.400 CROSS-SECTION P��m�
SRIGITNALDATE: asrazr2als CHATEAU #)ESP_
19 OF 19
LENNAR CAROLINAS, LLC CHARLOTTE, NC;
■ter■�
■■■■■■±■■■■■■■■■■■■,

Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
Permittee: Lennar Carolinas, LLC, Thomas Johnson Action ID: SAW-2016-00107
Project Name: Chateau Residential Subdivision County: Mecklenburg
Instructions to Permittee: The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the Mitigation Sponsor, either an approved
Mitigation Bank or the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS), who will then sign the form to verify the
transfer of the mitigation responsibility. Once the Sponsor has signed this form, it is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure
that to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Project Manager identified on page two is in receipt of a signed copy of this
form before conducting authorized impacts, unless otherwise specified below. If more than one mitigation Sponsor will be
used to provide the mitigation associated with the permit, or if the impacts and/or the mitigation will occur in more than one
S-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC), multiple forms will be attached to the permit, and the separate forms for each Sponsor
and/or HUC must be provided to the appropriate mitigation Sponsors.
Instructions to Sponsor: The Sponsor must verify that the mitigation requirements (credits) shown below are available at the
identified site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the identified mitigation, regardless of
whether or not they have received payment from the Permittee. Once the form is signed, the Sponsor must update the bank
ledger and provide a copy of the signed form and the updated bank ledger to the Permittee, the USACE Project Manager, and
the Wilmington District Mitigation Office (see contact information on page 2). The Sponsor must also comply with all
reporting requirements established in their authorizing instrument.
Permitted Impacts and Compensatory Mitigation Requirements:
Permitted Impacts Requiring Mitigation* 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03050103, Catawba River Basin
Stream Impacts (linear feet)
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
0.175
*If more than one mitigation sponsor will be used for the permit, only include impacts to be mitigated by this sponsor.
Compensatory Mitigation Requirements: 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03050103 Expanded Service Area
Stream Mitigation (credits)
Wetland Mitigation (credits)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
0.7
Mitigation Site Debited: NCDMS — Proposed ratio (2:1) doubled due to mitigation being provided in an expanded service
area.
(List the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the specific site. For NCDMS, list NCDMS. If the NCDMS
acceptance letter identifies a specific site, also list the specific site to be debited).
Section to be completed by the Mitigation Sponsor
Statement of Mitigation Liability Acceptance: I, the undersigned, verify that I am authorized to approve mitigation
transactions for the Mitigation Sponsor shown below, and I certify that the Sponsor agrees to accept full responsibility for
providing the mitigation identified in this document (see the table above), associated with the USACE Permittee and Action
ID number shown. I also verify that released credits (and/or advance credits for NCDMS), as approved by the USACE, are
currently available at the mitigation site identified above. Further, I understand that if the Sponsor fails to provide the
required compensatory mitigation, the USACE Wilmington District Engineer may pursue measures against the Sponsor to
ensure compliance associated with the mitigation requirements.
Mitigation Sponsor Name:
Name of Sponsor's Authorized Representative:
Signature of Sponsor's Authorized Representative Date of Signature

Conditions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit:
• Once this document has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the USACE is in receipt of the signed form, the
Permittee is no longer responsible for providing the mitigation identified in this form, though the Permittee remains
responsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in the permit conditions.
• Construction within jurisdictional areas authorized by the permit identified on page one of this form can begin only after
the USACE is in receipt of a copy of this document signed by the Sponsor, confirming that the Sponsor has accepted
responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. For authorized impacts conducted by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), construction within jurisdictional areas may proceed upon permit
issuance; however, a copy of this form signed by the Sponsor must be provided to the USACE within 30 days of permit
issuance. NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the USACE has received this form, confirming that the
Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein.
• Signed copies of this document must be retained by the Permittee, Mitigation Sponsor, and in the USACE administrative
records for both the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument. It is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that the USACE
Project Manager (address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form.
• If changes are proposed to the type, amount, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to
the USACE, the Sponsor must obtain case -by -case approval from the USACE Project Manager and/or North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). If approved, higher mitigation ratios may be applied, as per current District guidance
and a new version of this form must be completed and included in the USACE administrative records for both the permit
and the Bank/ILF Instrument.
Comments/Additional Conditions: A letter from NCDMS, confirming their willing and able to accept the applicants
compensatory mitigation responsibility, dated 9/13/2016 was included with the preconstruction notification.
This form is not valid unless signed below by the USACE Project Manager and by the Mitigation Sponsor on Page 1. Once
signed, the Sponsor should provide copies of this form along with an updated bank ledger to:1) the Permittee, 2) the USACE
Project Manager at the address below, and 3) the Wilmington District Mitigation Office, Attn: Todd Tugwell, 11405 Falls
of Neuse Road, Wake Forest, NC27587 (email: [e-mail]. mil). Questions regarding this form or any of the
permit conditions may be directed to the USACE Project Manager below.
USACE Project Manager: David L. Shaeffer
USACE Field Office: Asheville Regulatory Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Email: [e-mail]
Digitally signed by
SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI,
.
ou=USA, cn=SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Date: 2016.11.22 12:37:52-05'00' 11/22/2016
USACE Project Manager Signature Date of Signature
Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, including information on mitigation ratios, functional assessments, and
mitigation bank location and availability, and credit classifications (including stream temperature and wetland groupings) is
available at http://ribits.usace.army.mil

F
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENI AL DUALITY
Mr. Thomas Johnson
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
11230 Carmel Commons Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28226
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
j 1:'-�', f"+1-
27 October 2016
DWR# 16-0942
Mecklenburg County
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Chateau Development
Dear Mr. Johnson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those
conditions listed below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated September 23, 2016
and received by the Division of Water Resources (the Division) on September 30, 2016. After
reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality
General Certification Number 3890 which can be viewed on our web site at
htt s:Hde .no. ov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources- ermitslwastewater-
branch/401-wetlands-buffer- ermits1401- eneral-certifications. The General Certification allows
you to use Nationwide Permit Number 29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE). Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment
and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. it is advised that all conditions of the
Certification are reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the requirements of the
Certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your
application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be
required to send us a new application for a new Certification. If total wetland fills for this
project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in
the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. 15A NCAC 02H
.0506 and 15A NCAC 02H .0507
2. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the
approved impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)}
3. Approved Impacts:
Stale of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office) 610 East Center Avenue. Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Temporary Impact
Amount Approved
Permanent Impact
Stream
51 linear ft.
147 linear ft.
Wetland
.013 acre
0.175 acre
4. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and
erosion control measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and
turbidity. This includes interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506
(b)(3) and (c)(3)
5. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be
matted. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
6. You are required to provide one copy of the approved SMP, including plan details on full-
sized plan sheets, with Mecklenburg County's approval. The approved SMP shall be
submitted to the DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit (1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
NC 27699-1650) before any impacts authorized in this certification occur. After it is
approved and submitted to the Division, the SMP may not be modified without prior
written authorization from Mecklenburg County. If the SMP is modified in the future,
then you shall provide one modified SMP with proof of approval to the DWR 401 &
Buffer Permitting Unit prior to the commencement of the modifications.
7. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that
the potential receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment
accumulations, scouring or erosion of the stream banks. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)
8. The existing culvert located in stream S1 shall be removed as soon as practical.
9. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in
waters of the U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
10. The permittee shall report any violations of this Certification to the Division of Water
Resources within 24 hours of discovery. 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute
150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the Administrative
Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at
http://www.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
Within sixty (60) calendar days (30 days for bufferlisolated) of receipt of this notice, a
petition must be filed with the OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1)
copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours
(Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, excluding state holidays).
The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one
(1) copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within
five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the OAH:
if sending via US Postal Service: if sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714 Raleigh, NC 27609-6285

One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-807-6360.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
Attachments
cc: Amanda Jones, WPEG, email
David Schaeffer, Army Corps of Engineers, email
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit., email
MRO File copy
MRO, Land Quality

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL DUALITY
RECEIPT
December 21, 2016
Robert Price
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
11230 Carmel Commons Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28226
Project: Chateau Subdivision
County: Mecklenburg
WQ permit #: 16-0942
COE#:2016-00107
DMS#: 24187
Amount Paid: $53,454.75
Check Number: 810644
PAT MCCRORY
covernor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretarr
The NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404/CAMA Permit(s) issued for
the above- referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that your compensatory mitigation requirements
assigned to DMS associated with the authorized activity as specified below have been satisfied. You must also comply
with all other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization
associated with this activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
The DMS, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the Division is responsible for the compensatory
mitigation requirements indicated below associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory
mitigation as specified in the permit. Mitigation responsibility assigned to the DMS is nontransferable. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
River Basin
HUC
Stream Credits
(linear feet)
Wetland Credits
(acres)
Buffer 1& II
(Sq. Ft.)
Catawba 03
Cold
Cool
Warm
RiparianTo
Non-Ri arian
Coastal Marsh
Exp. Serv. Area
0
0
0
0.70
0
0
Refunds of payments made to NCDMS are only approved under certain conditions. All refund requests must be
submitted in accordance with the Division's refund policy at www.nceep.net. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
:Sirely,
icha I Ell
Director
cc: David Shaeffer, USACE-Asheville; Todd Tugwell, USACE-Raleigh
Amanda Jones, agent
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

ID#* 20160942
Version* 2
Regional Office * Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Alan Johnson
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 3/12/2021
Contact Name*
Contact Email Address*
Project Name*
Project Owner*
Project County*
Owner Address:
Heath Caldwell
[e-mail]
Chateau
Lennar Carolinas
Mecklenburg
Street Address
6701 Carmel Road
Address Line 2
Suite 425
aty
Charlotte
Postal/ Zip axle
28226
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
* 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
* Individual Permit F Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
(-- Yes C No
Please list all existing project ID's associated with this projects.*
DWR# 16-0942, SAW-2016-00107
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
Project was previously permitted but the developer ran out of time. No
additional impacts/changes are proposed.

Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
4/5/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
11. Old delin map_edited.pdf 278.84KB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 3/12/2021