NC0061719_WWTP Inspection_20070501

Michael F. Easley, Governor.
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2007
Michael Harwood, Compliance Engineering Manager
Heater Utilities Inc Owned By Aqua NC
202 Mackenan Ct
Cary NC 27511
SUBJECT: April 26, 2007 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Heater Utilities Inc Owned By Aqua NC
Woodlake Country Club WWTP
Permit No: NC0061719
Moore County
Dear Mr Harwood:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report from the inspection conducted on
April 26, 2007 by Hughie White of the Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance -
with permit NC0061719. As a reminder, since Aqua North Carolina has recently contracted operation of the
Woodlake facility to Envirolink, a new ORC designation form needs to be submitted to the Division on behalf of
Mr. Lamm.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff has,
any questions, please call me at 910-433-3308.
cc: William Lamm, ORC
Tim Thomas, Aqua NC
Central Files
Fayetteville Files
Sincerely,
dek-'
Hughie White
Environmental Specialist
Nnc
orthCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street— Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
1 1 NI 2 151 31 NC0061719 1 11 121 07/04/26 117
Type Inspector Fac Type
181 c1 19[ j 201 11
11�= �-
1 1111 1111111111166
Remarks
211111 1111 1 1 1 1 1111 1 11 1 111 1 1111 111
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
671 1 69 701 3 I 711 1 721 NI 731 1 174 751 I 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Woodlake Country Club WWTP
Merganser Way
Vass NC 28394
Entry Time/Date
10:15 AM 07/04/26
Permit Effective Date
06/06/01
Exit Time/Date
12:15 PM 07/04/26
Permit Expiration Date
11/05/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
William Edward Lamm/ORC/252-235-4900/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Michael Harwood,202 Mackenan Ct Cary NC 27511//919-467-8712/9194601 8
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those
areas evaluated)
Permit 1 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance
Self -Monitoring Program • Sludge Handling Disposal • Facility Site Review
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative
Waters
as necessary)
Records/Reports
Effluent/Receiving
and checklists
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Hughie White ..- FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.708/
�'j a�` 5/f/07
Signature of Management Q AReaviie/wA.er j•gte Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Datee1 �yBelinda S Henson K}'W�'/ FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.726/ 61/410 /
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

31
NPDES
NC0061719
111 121
yr/mo/day
07/04/26
Inspection Type
181cl
(cont.)
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Laboratory data was reviewed. All data appeared to be correct as reported on the DMR's. Calibration
records were properly documented. When needed, sludge disposal is performed by McGiII Environmental.
As part of the inspection, a review for Field Parameter Certification was performed. All requirements for that
certification appeared to be met. Since the last inspection, this facility has been issued a new NPDES
permit. The new permit states that a Total Residual Chlorine limit will become effective on December 1,
2007. There are' no plans to intall a de -chlorination unit at this facility. Instead, the tentative plans are to
eliminate the liquid disinfection unit and install an ultraviolet disinfection unit. Please be advised that this
new unit would need to be in place by December 1 of this year.
Page # 2

ti.
Permit: NC0061719 Owner - Facility: Woodlake Country Club WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? `❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: This facility will have a Total Residual Chlorine limit that will become
effective on December 1, 2007.
Bar Screens
Type of bar screen
a.Manual ■
b.Mechanical ❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 0 0 •
Comment:
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 0 v 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ 0 ■ 0
Yes No NA NE
Page # 3

Permit: NC0061719 Owner - Facility: Woodlake Country Club WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are weirs level? ■ ❑ n ❑
Is the site free of weir blockage? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? moon
Is scum removal adequate? 00110
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the drive unit operational? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? 0 0 0 ■
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? l n ❑ ❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Comment:
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? 0 0 ■ 0
Are the diffusers operational? • ❑ n ❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • ❑ n ❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the DO level acceptable? 0 0 0 ■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) 0 ❑ 0 ■
Comment:
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator tested under load? r n ❑ ❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection? 0 0 0 •
Page # 4

Permit: NC0061719 Owner - Facility: Woodlake Country Club WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site? in n ❑ ❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is the generator fuel level monitored? n ❑ ❑ ■
Comment:
Disinfection -Liquid Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant? 'Irmo
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational? 0 n n n
Is bulk storage, tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains) ■ ❑ ❑ n
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? ■ n ❑ ❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? n n ■ ❑
Comment: Dechlorination is not being performed as of yet at this facility.
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ® n ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ■ n n n
Is proper volume collected? ■ n ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? • n n 0
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)? ■ ❑ n ❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ n ❑ n
Comment:
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? ■ n 0 ❑
Is the mixing adequate? ❑ n n ■
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? n n n ■
# Is the odor acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ •
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page # 5

Vame of site to be Inspected:
=field certification # (ifapplicable):. 505 /
1PDES #:. !1Jc DO & 171.9 Region:•
I. Circle the parameter or parameters performed at this site:
Residual Chlorin Settleable Solids,OConductivity�l emRerature
II..Instrumentation:
Does the facility have the equipment necessaryto analyze
e field parameters as circled above?
1. A pH. meter No
2. A Residual Chlorine meter
3. DO meter
4. A Cone for settleable solids
5. A thermometer ormeter that measures temperature.
5. Conductivity meter
III. Calibration/Analysis:
1. Is the pH metercalibrated with a 2 buffers and
checked with a third buffer each day of use?
2. For Total Residual Chlorine, is a check standard
analyzed each day of use?
3. Is the air calibration: of the:DO meter performed
each day of use?
4. For Settleable Solids, is.1.liter of sample
settled for 1 hour? :
5. Is the temperature measuring device calibrated
annually against a certified thermometer?
6. For Conductivity, is a calibration standard
analyzed each day of use?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes.
No
• No

IV. Documentation:
1. Is thedate and time that the sample was collected documented?
2, Is the sampl&site documented? :.
3. Is the sample collector documented?
4. Is the analysis date and time documented?
5.:Did theanalyst sign the .documentation?
6. Is record of calibration documented?
7. For Settleable, Solids, is sample; volume an
1 hour time settling time documented?
8. For Temperature, is the annual calibration of
the measuring device documented?
Comments:
No
Please submit a copy of this completed. form to the Laboratory Certification Program.
DWQ Lab Certification
Chemistry Lab
Courier # 52-01.-01
FIELD INSPECTOR CHECKLIST REV. 04/23/2002

North Carolina,
Mr. Hughie White
Environmental Specialist
Fayetteville Regional Office, NC DWQ
225 Green Street — Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. White,
Reid Campbell, P.E.
Aqua North Carolina
202 MacKenan Ct.
Cary, North Carolina 27511
June 1, 2007
Regional Manager - Compliance
T: 919.467.8712
F: 919.460.1788
email: [e-mail]
DENR-FRO
.9 U 5 2007
[WV
I am writing in response to your Compliance Evaluation Inspection form for the Woodlake
WWTP, dated May 1, 2007. In the letter you discuss the inspection details and review of
the self -monitoring data. We were glad that you found the facility to be in compliance with
its permit requirements. We will be submitting a new ORC designation form to the Division
shortly.
If you have any questions about this issue please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
-e
Reid Campbell, P.E.
Regional Manager, Compliance
Aqua North Carolina
cc: William Lamm, ORC