20130530 Ver 1_More Info Received_20130613

�o13 - Os�3
ot W AT �9pG
h �
O `f
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: n/a or General Permit (GP) number: n/a
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express N Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
N Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes N No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Aversboro Pump Station Improvements and Force Main Project
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Garner
2d. Subdivision name:
n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information D MR
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
City of Raleigh a 8nartch
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
n/a
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Eileen Navarrete, City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
3d. Street address:
One Exchange Plaza, Suite 620
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27601
3f. Telephone no.:
919 - 996 -3480
3g. Fax no.:
919 - 857 -4545
3h. Email address:
Eileen. Navarrete @raleighnc.gov
JUI 11c�013
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 J nuary 2009
1

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
City of Raleigh
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Betio Reed, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
5c. Street address:
P.O. Box 33068
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27636
5e. Telephone no.:
919 - 677 -2073
5f. Fax no.:
919- 677 -2050
5g. Email address:
beth.reed @ldmley- hom.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
n/a
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.672800 Longitude: - 78.620400
1c. Property size:
11.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Lake Benson
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -III; NSW,CA
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing conditions consist of maintained /disturbed right of way corridors along Buffaloe Rd and Aversboro Rd. The
project will parallel an existing sewer line. Land use in the vicinity is medium to low- density residential development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 25 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed protect:
The project will upgrade the existing 1.7 MGD Averboro Pump Station to a capacity of 4.7 MGD and construct 7,800 LF of 24" parallel force main
sewer line along Aversboro Rd and Buffaloe Rd to support current and future development in the area. The project will parallel an existing sewer
line for the majority of the project corridor.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The majority of the force main will be installed by open trenching with trackhoes and excavators within currently
maintained /disturbed areas. The force main will be installed beneath the existing culverted stream channel to minimize impacts.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Beth Reed, PWS
Agency /Consultant Company: Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE (Craig Brown) issued a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination on July 20, 2012, and the documentation is attached. NCDWQ (Martin Richmond) concurred with the
jurisdictional calls on June 18, 2012, and added that Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules apply to the mapped streams in the corridor (see attached email correspondence).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes No ®Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
n/a
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? —F—[:]Yes
Q No
6b. If yes, explain.
All construction will be completed as one project.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries Q Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments: No wetland impacts will result from the proposed construction.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: No stream impacts will result from the proposed construction. The force main will be trenched
underneath a culverted section of the jurisdictional stream channel that is located on site. No stream
impacts will result from this method of construction.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
02
03
04
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open water impacts will result from the proposed construction.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
No ponds will be constructed as a result of the proposed construction.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
n/a
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
n/a
5k. Method of construction:
n/a
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61
Sewer line installation
UT to Lake Benson
No
300
200
B2
133
B4
65
66
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
300
200
6i. Comments: Buffers will be impacted to allow placement of construction equipment to facilitate open trench installation below the alverted jurisdictional stream
channel looted along Buffaloe Road.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The force main has been placed within existing Right -of -way areas whenever possible, and the 24" force main will also
be located beneath the culverted jurisdictional stream channel to avoid impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Open cut installation of the force main will be utilized underneath the single culverted stream crossing proposed by this
project. This crossing will occur within existing Right -of -way to ensure there are no impacts to jurisdictional waters of
the US by the proposed construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes Q No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: n/a
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Type:
Type:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments: n/a
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes Q No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
n/a
6h. Comments:
Non - electric utility line perpendicular crossings of streams, disturbing greater than 40 but less than 150 linear feet of
buffer with maintenance corridor equal to or less than 10 feet wide are "allowable" under Neuse Buffer Rules.
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Existing drainage patterns and capacities will be maintained. No new stormwater
® Yes ❑ No
runoff will be generated, concentrated, or collected as a result of this project.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
1.04%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The only additional impervious area associated with the project occurs with improvements to the existing Aversboro Pump Station located on a parcel
that adjoins White Deep Park. The installation of the force main occurs along an existing sewer line, no new impervious area will be added as a result
of the force main. The City of Gamer Engineering Department decided to incorporate the Pump Station parcel into the White Deer Park acreage for
the purpose of nitrogen calculations. The Town determined that the project does not trigger nitrogen and stormwater BMP requirements (see
attachment 2).
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
n/a
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh, Town of Garner
0 Phase II
0 NSW
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
0 Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes 0 No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
[]Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaVstate /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
®Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
® Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
n/a
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
®Yes
❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
(see attachment 3; an excerpt from the Land Use section of the EA document)
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will install a 24 -inch force main along side an existing sewer line to convey wastewater, but it will not
generate wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
0 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh Feld Office
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? NC NHP Map Viewer, and USFWS Coordination through agency scoping letters as part of the EA document.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA MFS EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO HPOWeb GIS Service, and SHPO coordination through agency scoping letters as part of the EA document.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Since no structures will be built in the floodplain other than the buried force main, and no net fill will result from the project,
Wake County Environmental Services has determined that this project is exempt from Flood Study requirements or FEMA
Certification. See attachment 4 for Wake County's determination.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA DFIRM Panels 1619 & 1710.
Eileen Navarrete, P.E.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Attachment 1
Aversboro Pump Station Improvements
and Force Main Project — Approved
FONSI

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
CITY OF RALEIGH — AVERSBORO PUMP STATION D01PROVEMENTS
AND PARALLEL FORCE MAIN PROJECT
Pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. § 113A-1, et
seq.), an environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared by the City of Raleigh Public Utilities
Department (CORPUD) for the upgrade of the existing 1.7 million gallons per day (MGD) Aversboro
Pump Station (APS) to a capacity of 4.7 MGD and construction of approximately 7,800 linear feet of 24-
inch parallel force main. The proposed infrastructure is necessary to support both current and project
service area (PSA) build -out development; the existing PSA boundaries will not change as a result of this
project. Wastewater will flow to an existing gravity sewer and be treated at the Neuse River Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
Four alternatives were considered for this project: 1) no action; 2) eliminate the APS and convey flow via
a new Buffaloe Road gravity sewer line; 3) construct the Heather Hill gravity sewer line to divert a
portion of flow from the APS; and 4) expand the APS and construct a parallel force main to convey
increased future wastewater flow. Upon consideration and evaluation of each alternative, the fourth
alternative was found to be the most viable.
Direct impacts have been avoided and minimized to the extent practicable during project planning and
design. With the exception of the APS site, where a small area will be graded to prepare equipment pads,
the entire project will parallel existing easements and rights -of -way. Although some easements will be
widened to accommodate the new infrastrucutre, this will not cause a significant change in current land
uses. Installation will produce temporary impacts to local topography from trench excavation and the
stockpiling of materials; however, excavated soils will be returned to the trench following installation and
preconstruciton contours will be reestablished so that there will be no direct long-term impacts to
topography or floodplains from laying the force main. Approximately one -half of an acre of forested area
will be cleared to allow for installation of the force main along a greenway within the White Deer Park.
Also, approximately 450 square feet of Neuse River riparian buffer area will be impacted to
accommodate an underground perpendicular stream crossing. A permanently - maintained 30 -foot
easement is not expected to have significant impacts to local wildlife or natural vegetation. Local
increases in airborne particulates and exhaust emissions will be temporary and cease upon completion of
construction. Operation of the proposed infrastructure should not create nuisance odors. Open burning of
cleared vegetation and construction debris will not occur. Noise levels will temporarily increase in the
immediate vicinity of construction. Minor, localized air quality impacts and minimal nuisance noise is
likely to accompany the operation of an emergency power generator that will ensure proper functioning of
the APS during times of power failure. This project is not expected to impact listed species; to ensure
compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, field reconnaissance was conducted within the
project corridor that did not locate suitable habitat for listed species within the project corridor. There
will not be any significant permanent direct negative impacts on existing topography and soils; land use;
wetlands; prime or unique agricultural lands; archaeological or historical resources; water resources;
shellfish or fish and their habitats; and wildlife and natural vegetation. Hazardous spills of toxic
substances are not expected during either construction or operation of the proposed infrastructure.
Secondary and cumulative environmental impacts may result from this project and are outlined in the EA.
State and local programs to mitigate such impacts in the project area are described in detail within the EA,
including local growth management and zoning ordinances that promote orderly growth through
proficient use of land and cost-effective provision of infrastructure and services. The Swift Creek Land
Management Plan controls land use and growth within the project area and established vegetative buffers
and a critical area to control non -point source pollution. The project area is also subject to the Neuse
River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy, which will reduce the level of pollutants that

otherwise could enter waterways as well as control stormwater discharge rates from new development and
redevelopment. Garner also has a NPDES Phase II Stormwater Program, which requires it to develop,
implement, and enforce a stormwater ,program designed to reduce the discharge of pdllutants to the
maximum extent practicable. Expansion of Garner's water and sewer infrastructure is limited by growth
restrictions outlined m the Garner/Raleigh Water and Sewer Utility Merger Agreement. The City of
Raleigh's Sampling and Monitoring Program will allow Raleigh and Garner to monitor the cumulative
effect of development within the surface area on downstream waters.
Based on the findings of the EA, the impact avoidance/mitigation measures contained therein, and review
by governmental agencies, the Division of Water Quality has concluded that the proposed project will not
result in significant impacts to the environment. This EA and Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSn
are prerequisites for the issuance of Division of Water Quality permits necessary for the project's
construction. An Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared for this project. This FNSI
completes the environmental review record, which is available for inspection at the State Clearinghouse.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
15 January 2013

MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
March 6, 2013
Beth Reed, PWS
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
SUBJECT: Wake County — CORPUD's Aversboro Pump Station Improvements and
Parallel Force Main Project
DWQ# 14450; DENR#1577
Dear Beth:
John Skvada
Secretary
On February 26, 2013, the State Clearinghouse deemed the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act review on
the above project complete (see attached correspondence from the Clearinghouse). It is now acceptable to
proceed with your permit applications through the Division of Water Quality for the proposed project.
Please take note of the February 1, 2013 correspondence from the North Carolina Department of Public Safety —
Emergency Management. Please ensure that appropriate personnel with CORPUD and the Town of Gainer
review and apply for the permits outlined in these comments. In addition, in order to comply with these
comments, please make the changes to Section 7.0 and make mention that "all structures and utilities should be
protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation as described in the Town of Garner's ordinance, Wake
County's ordinance, and 44 CFR 60.3" as requested. These changes to the EA will not require any type of
recirculation or review prior to the project proceeding to permitting.
If there is anything I can assist you with, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (919) 807 -6434.
Sincerely,
A444a"
Hannah Headrick
SEPA Coordinator
Attachments: (SCH Sign Off Letter, FONSI)
Ecc: Danny Smith
1617 Mat Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
Locatton: 512 N. Salisbury SL Raleigh. North Carotrna 27604
Phone: 919-807MM \ FAX [phone]
Internet www. amterauatrty om
An Equal oppo W1y t Ai8mwQw Action ErrrpbYer
NorthCarolina

C �VW
North Carolina
Department of Administration
Pat McCrory, Governor
February 26, 2013
Ms. Hannah Headrick
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Bill Daughtridge, Jr., Secretary
Re: SCH File # 13- E4300 -0288; EA/FONSI; Proposal to upgrade the existing Aversboro Pump
Station to improve and expand the sewer service in the area. Project is located in the
vicinity of Aversboro Road and Buffalo Road in Garner, NC
Dear Ms. Headrick:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been reviewed through the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Attached to this letter are comments made in the review of this document. Because of the nature of the
comments, it has been determined that no further State Clearinghouse review action on your part is
needed for compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act. The attached comments
should be taken into consideration in project development.
Sincerely,
Cry est
State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region J
MdflffgAddmW releplwa (919)80'! -242$ Locadao l *gi
1301 Mail Savior Center Fax [phone] West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1301 State Courier 051 -01-00 Raleigh, Norio Carolina
e-mail stateclearinghouse(a} boxy -gov
An Equal OppW*mIV,(8# -0II v8 Anton Employer

DR. t tr#ms MR e� h I wta ltj, m r e
DaM member -*2M
The gopartmefir-of En*cmmentand-NabraiResawmh4�-rdvlowWtbe-propostdproject. *e-q-*Atj
tomomrits- are ftapplrcant� torisideration.
;A ivb.u,:f -Q*A7, u4ftyAfa -riiow, . .1.
AttachimblA
ritor
11 3 Set"'
T&
Hahifah Headtick
WvWon of Water Ctuallry
($VI'sibo of
Ptetinit ftslitaitce &?Wodt Rolift CoatdtfiMr
CD*RPUWs*.Avosb-otb FOV AAW )MOIGIfflotntS Ofid FOrVfO. FOW Millb Pi-0101
IWAO ounty
DaM member -*2M
The gopartmefir-of En*cmmentand-NabraiResawmh4�-rdvlowWtbe-propostdproject. *e-q-*Atj
tomomrits- are ftapplrcant� torisideration.
;A ivb.u,:f -Q*A7, u4ftyAfa -riiow, . .1.
AttachimblA

T
i
!Hardison, Lyn
From:
Roddy, Jackie
Sent:
Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:37 AM
T•o:
Harxiison, Lyn
Cc:
Kaufman T
subjetdr
�.�.__.
oject
Ms. Hardison,
Thank you for providing-the Dlvision of Water Resources (DWR) - Public Water Supply Section (PWS) an opportunity to
provide comments regarding th
Wake Counties, Project #11577 due iovember , L �
At this time, DWR -PWS offers tfeigg ,•Dat
3 _�.
#lop bet�vei'ii v#iatef.rraai#rs arf8 s iier;Jirtes it3ciUiJifig fo�ttI -ffi I
.ti��;k.�h�e "$vles Gnuedni�ig.Ptih�l,�c l4k4„��e�r Supp�yS� stems°. '
TjYa�ks, .
Jackie Roddy, P.E.
Ernvironmental Engirteer
Division of Water Resources
Public-Water Supply Section
lWeigh, NC27699 -16A
Phone: [phone]
Fax:-(919) 715 -4374
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
1

& a
j�
'44
PRO&
DAM S-Nmmtor. 20
StmiEcT.- 9wAw==tdAoem=tfbrAv=b=-Poinp ftdoblmDrovemtnts-imd'Psi%lfcf
YOMIQU
ba W,
. MAe
subject d0o%mt- add Wdft IMUM VaWo 4%t iv*
accordarme
LIAC-66ILMe V-06rMll EDWDIu-MchWj'ol'i6 At� (#& li A &MOMAit f&AC
=9 .
IF5-al itic4j..
v
Mtdt ft eats
Tbt i
Rivoirbasin,
ilowfiom*.
&Cbvft#t
vqftio 0110-700*26 0. T*
Wtb*.4�m
x MOT oot;

l
Page 2 '
8 November 2012
EA — Avemboro Pump Station & Force Main
DENR Project No. 1577
We concur with the findings of the Environmental Assessment, and we anticipate [invited direct
impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources provided all of the measures described in the
document are used (i.e., use of existing rights -of -way, no stream and wetland impacts, and sedimentation
and erosion control measures). We recommend that sediment and erosion control measures are routinely
inspected and property maintained Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental
effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging
of gills of aquatic species.
The project will be designed to support new development within the project service area - The
City of Raleigh has prepared a Secondary and Cunwladve Impact Management Plan that includes the
City of Garner and addresses the secondary and cumulative impacts of the proposed project.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on dais project. If we can be of farther assistance,
please contact our office at (336) 449 -7625 or shad.brvantta'lncwildlife.org.
I t

Prejoct NaSW, r-4ivirqnjwooful
7OW? 105 f"W'"
�. . 9 .
Ak
MA.
Bob IJA3/2012
P kill Alit projeu OW0,414400)
NiZDA
-wahop
A _p
Wit r
F"
-w
42,
` UviroA and Nptura fees
2% ML
0*
-6
ew For 1 1.
Aol
Ln
W-ft*&M
&
f -!RX :7
:
MA.
Bob IJA3/2012
P kill Alit projeu OW0,414400)
NiZDA
-wahop
A _p
Wit r
F"
-w
42,
UAAf,?Ol
2% ML
0*
4S44
Ln
W-ft*&M
W
•L vmm�
WOW,
yyyy��yyqyyy�`tQ .
. . . ........
Me
�"#*.
AO
Y...
r WCN

sue. •.
•' z
aa' a'
qw.
'•
1
'I`�
• ;� •�'�
�_±,
T'
'.� �
.� •
�L
111
��
p� p
� �
p
�
b
� `
pV �pgT
.'.�
�
N h
�i',Y
z•
Ar
Y.
•�'
• W
YM
: z "
.0
` rA.r•
`�`'�
is
ry �
r
;:•,•�]
:a
TS ..S
`` % • «rl
tom+.
�'
1�g4
:F4
E•�
���
�
g�
gip.=
` �_ii�
'wi�•r P
'S' O:
,�,
f'
a i
CAA .Ana.
��•
'•'y''•
JAS. � �
� i
� � '
,t��i {
y
� '�
�°'r'��g
r
� �"ty.'
z
Y �
�
tTy � � `
�q
:�
_
�
iR °
W
"
Z
7C•
o
a §}[.g�
d
rf.
�p
e�SrS
off
.t
aS ��'g
C''S''I
i
•��'
;'. G
Y��
�'�
}Q�•So "L�
�
g11 v
To
�,�j� 'L��.!-'�
.. $g•
�'
� � •
�u'm•
�
7g�
,€
ra p Q ��
•
e
s .
c
(�
ad
'gam
0
��
6. a
�S
��
�
3
�
3
�
� o
�3�
SM
�•
•Si��4
��
�
'�¢gjs�C
`�
�
8
��
$
tom'
�G
dS�
r7i•�+
a�
C
E
C
C
[
. ueFw, a, �i!; �* t6ii�ra;' �w .pw�.ny�oie�,�p�ppraa�e,+ra.+' air,•- {�+e�.u;yt•uu:.s•.^ tics:•• Y7, ri�Zn•= r#:".' �bt• ���. �ttsa•. a.. :.w.a.:....•e'..i...n- :.:��,q.s rnm>; ...t. "::.....:_. ., .b...•Y•v..::.. w: ,... .._.....•. ._... ... •....— _•_-- -...... ., ... _. ...

s
+
w
Name Process Tbaa
(etedna9 are
i
PERMITS
r
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
-i
1
-+
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regitinai Office marked below.
it Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanos, NC 28778
[phone]
I PayettevUle Rq#onal Ofiiee
225 North Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville. NC 28301 -5043
(910) 433 -3300
.1 Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
(704)663 -1699
I Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh,. NC 27609
[phone]
9 Washington Regional Office
9�33''Wasiitrigloii�gtlfire� tall •
Washington. NC 27889
[phone]
'I Wilmington Regional Ofnee
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
(910) 796 -7215
-1 Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughiown street
Winston - Salem, NC 27107
(336) 771 -5000
Name Process Tbaa
(etedna9 are
PERMITS
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
Pile aaepr tamd of A8 with GKR rrmbtg to Stele of NC ca ftmW au
10 days
Cl
Permit to drip exploratory oR at tits via
say vre0 opened by drill open mrshatt. up- aWafowaad, be pkaW
WA
G�PhY taartdl
according to &NR rtes and tegnladona
n
AWaatltm fled w to ENR N lean 10 days ptia to Issue or pt7mit.
10 char
APPH alion by IMkc No stadud appitealoo fart
, NIA .
Applitzlat Ores based on amass stn is etwV& Mau iadWitdemiptiaa
ifs days
1-1
State Lou Ct>nsm4w Peanit
rid drawings of slrueture & proof of owaershtp of dpatian
WA
Proporty.
n
401 Wow QwUVCenifreaoo
IVA
ffifts
130
n
c" Permit Olt mwoR dnedopmral
S2SOA0 ree mmt aeeomputy� eppfrcatiat
dr7s
(ISO days)
n
CA" Perry* for MINOR devetopmcal
SSOA W most accompany appticadon
��
Several g o&* wormo rWt arc locoed or am rAe 9*0 awes wW amm mat ands to be awaW or *Wge4 please no ft
n
N.C. ccadetta surm, gas 27M Rah:lglt, NC M1
n
Abwdanmemofagwetb. ifregtdadowtbein =or&=wMTide1 SA. StwMw2.0100.
lk
NopGeation of the proper meow w4ce is requested if'otphao+und woww some tuft OWS) No 44an cd 6ft =7 vmvodm opemdoa
r.1
ComplW= whh 13A NCAC 2H 1000 (Cumtal StatnaraterRpta) is required.
45 days
(WA)
rl
Tar PamReo or Neale Riperbn Buft Roca requited.
t Oiha comments (attah add OOR man saes w.
oa ct"Wh to alto comment suntaigr)
2013
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regitinai Office marked below.
it Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanos, NC 28778
[phone]
I PayettevUle Rq#onal Ofiiee
225 North Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville. NC 28301 -5043
(910) 433 -3300
.1 Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
(704)663 -1699
I Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh,. NC 27609
[phone]
9 Washington Regional Office
9�33''Wasiitrigloii�gtlfire� tall •
Washington. NC 27889
[phone]
'I Wilmington Regional Ofnee
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
(910) 796 -7215
-1 Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughiown street
Winston - Salem, NC 27107
(336) 771 -5000

COUNTY: WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
H03:
MS RENEE GLEDHILL- EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
CC &PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRIANGLE J COG
ITEMS (LINES, P. P STATE NUMBER: 13 -E -4300 -0288
�'a► ✓ DATE RECEIVED: 01/24/2013
AGENCY RESPONSE: 02/20/2013
REVIEW CLOSED: 02/25/2013
G! (- IX- U449
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: NCDENR
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Assessment /Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposal to upgrade the existing Aversboro Pump Station to improve and expand the
sewer service in the area. Project is located in the vicinity of Aversboro Road
and Buffalo Road in Garner, NC
CROSS - REFERENCE NUMBER: 12 -E- 0000 -0245
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at (919)807 -2425.
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: DATE: o�' lY•/�
A
FEB 2013
Azvo
&jA0"k,
DO
r

a
COUNTY: WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE ammuNmoun
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERG0VERNM UTAL REVIEW
H03: SEWER SYSTEMS (LINES, PUMP
STATIONS)
MS CARRIE ATKINSON
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATEWIDE PLANNING - MSC #1554
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
CC &PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
rZ7�414vr
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRIANGLE J COG
STATE NUMBER: 13 -£- 4300 -0288
DATE RECEIVED: 01/24/2013
AGENCY RESPONSE: 02/20/2013
REVIEW CLOSED: 02/25/2013
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: NCDENR
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Assessment /Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposal to upgrade the existing Aversboro Pump Station to improve and expand the
sewer service in the area. Project is located in the vicinity of Aversboro Road
and Buffalo Road in Garner, NC
CROSS- REFERENCE NUMBER: 12 -E- 0000 -0245
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at (919)807 -2425.
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: ® NO COMMENT [] COMMENTS ATTACHED
2: all
SIGNED BY: a DATE:
NAA f.

COUNTY: WAKE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
R03-SEWER SYSTEMS (LINES, PUMP
STATIONS)
MS CAROLYN PENNY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
CC &PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
MSC # 4719
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
CC &PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRIANGLE J COG
STATE NtDMER: 13 -E -4300 -0288
DATE RECEIVED: 01124/2013
AGENCY RESPONSE: 02/20/2013
REVIEW CLOSED: 02/25/2013
RE0,610
UAN
�, 6 ,
+g�,,z,�ot,3
"�
�
PROJECT INFOrd4hTION
APPLICANT: NCDENR
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Assessment /Finding of No Significant Impact
DESC: Proposal to upgrade the existing Aversboro Pump Station to improve and expand the
sewer service in the area. Project is located in the vicinity of Aversboro Road
and Buffalo Road in Garner, NC
CROSS - REFERENCE NUMBER: 12 -E -0000 -0245
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at (919)807 -2425.
AS A RESULT OF THI REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: F1 NO COMMENT F] COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: 1 , J DATE: � a 3

North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Emergency Management
Pat McCrory, Governor
Klernan J. Shanahan, Secretary
-
February 1, 2013
State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Administration'
1301 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1301
Subject: Intergovernmental Review State Number; 13 -E -4300 -0288
Aversboro Pump Station, Town of Garner and Wake County
As requested by the North Carolina State Clearinghouse, the North Carolina Department of
Crime Control and Public Safety Division of Emergency Management Office of Geospatial and
Technology Management (GTM) reviewed the proposed project listed above and offer the
following comments:
1) As noted in the initial response to this project dated April 12, 2012, the Town of
Garner and Wake County participate in the National Flood Insurance Program and
enforce Flood Damage Prevention Ordinances that require a Floodplain Development
Permit be `issued for all development located in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
within their jurisdictions. Please ensure the Town of Garner's and Wake County's
Floodplain Administrators reviews and Issues permits for each respective part of the
Aversboro Pump Station and Force Main project that impact a SFHA. This applies
regardless of whether the Impact is permanent or temporary.
2) A portion of the project appears to be within the SFHA of Reedy Branch (Basin 20,
Stream 11), Panels 1700 & 1710. Any grading, fill or placement of equipment or
materials in the SFHA of Reedy Branch will require a floodplain development permit
Issued by the Town of Garner. A Town of Garner Floodplain Development Permit
should be added to Section 7.0: Required Local, State, and Federal Permits.
3) A portion of the project appears to be within the SFHA of Bagwell Branch (Basin 20,
Stream 10), Panel 1619. Any grading, fill or placement of equipment or materials in
the SFHA of Bagwell Branch will require a floodpiain development permit issued by
Wake County. A Wake County Floodplain Development Permit should be added to
Section 7.0: Required Local, State, and Federal Permits.
4) The Environmental Assessment should note that all structures and utilities should be
protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation as described in the Town of
Garner's ordinance, Wake County's ordinance, and 44 CFR 60.3.
MAI NG ADDRESS:
4218 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699 -4218
www.ncem.org
cH CAROLINA —'-
'te=
M EqualOppoft* Employer
GT.M.QPJ4F LOCAUON -
4105 Reedy Creels Road
Raleigh, NC 2 7607
Telepho= (919) 825 -2341
Fax: [phone]

13 -E -4300 -0288
Page 2 of 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions concerning
the above comments, please contact Dan Brubaker, P.E., CFM, the NC NFIP Engineer at
(919) 825 -2300, by email at dn.brubaker(dacdps.aov or at the address shown on the
footer of this documents.
Sincerely,
nn h W. Ashe, P.E., 1114
Assistant Director
Geospatial and Technology Management Office
cc: John Gerber, NFIP State Coordinator
Dan Brubaker, NFIP Engineer

Attachment 2
Memorandum from Town of Garner
Engineering Department

Town of Garner
Engineering Department
Memorandum
To: File
From: Jaclyn Sumner
Stormwater Engineer
Re: White Deer Park modification with the addition of the Raleigh Pump Station parcel
Date: August 1, 2012
City of Raleigh wanted to add an additional 5227 square feet to upscale its pump station located
on a parcel that adjoins White Deer Park and Lake Benson. The Engineering Department decided
to incorporate that parcel into the White Deer Park acreage for the purpose of nitrogen
calculations. The parcel on its own would have triggered nitrogen and stormwater BMP
requirements. There is an additional 0.49 acres added into the 91.41 acre site at White Deer Park.
This brings the total project acreage to 91.90 acres and a total of 5.19 acres of impervious
surface, which is 5.26 %.
Copies of the nitrogen worksheets and correspondence are attached.

Nitrogen Control Plan - July 2009
Method 2: CommerciaUlndustrial/Residential Sites with Known Impervious Area
Project Name: ✓12. U, KA 1 t k RWr" Date:
Applicant: M.47/411A Telephone:
Part L Riparian Buffers
Does site contain riparian buffers? [ ] No
Part U. Nitrogen Calculation
9-1 t J zo f
gj - ya/1ix3y2_
[ ] Yes (show buffers on plan) [ ] Exempt (show basis for exemption)
Item
Proposed Site Information
Area acres
1
Total project acreage
Existing forest land
2
Total proposed impervious area
13AA. Aq
3
Existing impervious area (prior to 319/01
4.4
4
New impervious area Item 2 - Item 3
unmown meadow, wetlands, buffers) (Item 5)
5 TPermanently
protected undisturbed open space
b
6 1
Permanently protected managed open ace
961-44 1
Pre - Develo meat Loading
Type of Land Cover
Area
acres
TN export coefficient
bs/ae/ r
TN export from use
lbs/ r
Existing forest land
. A7
1.7
13AA. Aq
Existing pasture
Permanently protected undisturbed open space (forest,
4.4
0.6
Existing residential
unmown meadow, wetlands, buffers) (Item 5)
7.5
20
Existing cropland
Q
13.6
I'2
Existing commercial/industrial
,
13
,
TOTAL j,
Nitrogen Loading Rate° bs /ac/ r
g,
�` �'
Nitrogen Loading Rate (Ibs/ac /yr) = Total TN export from use (lbs/yr) + Total Area (acres)
Post-Development Loading
before BMPs and/or Offset Payments
Type of Land Cover
Area
TN export coefficient
TN export from
Stonnwater Wetland
acres
bs/ac/ r
use bs/ r
Permanently protected undisturbed open space (forest,
-0
0.6
Q
unmown meadow, wetlands, buffers) (Item 5)
Grass Swale
20
Permanently protected managed open space
p
�o- (
I'2
��7 ' 05-
(grass, landscaping, etc.) (Item 6)
O
Dry Detention
Impervious surfaces (roads, parldng lots, driveways,
�` �'
21.2
0 9
roofs, paved storage areas, etc.) (Item 4
TOTAL
g • So�
---------------
Nomk-i
- O�
(Item 7)
----- - - - --
m 8)
Nitrogen Loading Rate (lbs /ac/yr) (Equals Item 8 + Item 7)
[ 25-
BMP Tv a
TN Removal Rate (%
Check which apply
Wet Pond
25
Stonnwater Wetland
40
Sand Filter
35
Bioretention
35
Grass Swale
20
V elated Filter Strip w /Level Spreader
20
50' Restored or Additional Riparian buffer w /Level S reader
30
Dry Detention
10

Amount of Offset (Pounds of Nitrogen) [Item 10 x (Item 1— Item 3) x 30 years] N IA--
*Please refer to the link below to determine the procedure for payment of the nitrogen offset payment It is necessary for applicants to
demonstrate compliance with SL 2009 -337, which indicates that applicants must first purchase offset credits through private
mitigation banks. If no such credits are available, applicants may then buy their offset credits from the NC EEP. These banks are listed
by basin and further information regarding this session law can be found at the following link:
http://test.neeep.net/pages/ILF—Program__intro.html
Part M. Control of Peak Stormwater Flow
Calculated Pre - development Peak Flow (1 -year)
Calculated Post - development Peak Flow without Controls (1 -year)
Calculated Post - development Peak Flow with Controls (1 -year)
Calculations and details showing control of nitrogen and peak stormwater runoff control must be included.
Part IV: Watershed Development Permit
1. Total project acreage (in Lake Benson Watershed) 91. I
2. Total proposed impervious surface (in Lake Benson Watershed) 5-, I g
3. Existing impervious surface (in Lake Benson Watershed)
4. Equivalent project acreage (Item 1 — Item 3)
5. New impervious surface (Item 2 — Item 3)
6. Percent impervious [(Item 5 -= Item 4) x 100]
* Limited to impervious surface existing before 7/1/93
I, the undersigned, certify that to the best of my knowledge that the above information is correct (affix seal)
y'b - -r" tr
(sign)
To be filled in by staff
Project Watershed Protection Requirements
❑ Project Exempt: Explain
❑ Project Located in Lake Benson Conservation District — LBCD (Critical Area) Standards Apply
❑ Project Located Outside LBCD — On -site treatment required.
❑ Minor Variance Requested (WRB) Approved (date): Disapproved (date):
❑ Major Variance Requested (EMC) Approved (date): Disapproved (date):
Recommended by WRB (circle one): YES NO
Comments (use additional sheet if necessary)
Approved by Watershed Administrator. (sign)
Date:
Post-Development Loading after BMPs and/or Offset Payments
Item
Description
Nitro en Loading Rate lbs/ac/ r
9
Nitrogen load after BMPs show separately in detail
[ . C12
10
Nitrogen load offset by ayments Item 9 — 3.6
--�"
Amount of Offset (Pounds of Nitrogen) [Item 10 x (Item 1— Item 3) x 30 years] N IA--
*Please refer to the link below to determine the procedure for payment of the nitrogen offset payment It is necessary for applicants to
demonstrate compliance with SL 2009 -337, which indicates that applicants must first purchase offset credits through private
mitigation banks. If no such credits are available, applicants may then buy their offset credits from the NC EEP. These banks are listed
by basin and further information regarding this session law can be found at the following link:
http://test.neeep.net/pages/ILF—Program__intro.html
Part M. Control of Peak Stormwater Flow
Calculated Pre - development Peak Flow (1 -year)
Calculated Post - development Peak Flow without Controls (1 -year)
Calculated Post - development Peak Flow with Controls (1 -year)
Calculations and details showing control of nitrogen and peak stormwater runoff control must be included.
Part IV: Watershed Development Permit
1. Total project acreage (in Lake Benson Watershed) 91. I
2. Total proposed impervious surface (in Lake Benson Watershed) 5-, I g
3. Existing impervious surface (in Lake Benson Watershed)
4. Equivalent project acreage (Item 1 — Item 3)
5. New impervious surface (Item 2 — Item 3)
6. Percent impervious [(Item 5 -= Item 4) x 100]
* Limited to impervious surface existing before 7/1/93
I, the undersigned, certify that to the best of my knowledge that the above information is correct (affix seal)
y'b - -r" tr
(sign)
To be filled in by staff
Project Watershed Protection Requirements
❑ Project Exempt: Explain
❑ Project Located in Lake Benson Conservation District — LBCD (Critical Area) Standards Apply
❑ Project Located Outside LBCD — On -site treatment required.
❑ Minor Variance Requested (WRB) Approved (date): Disapproved (date):
❑ Major Variance Requested (EMC) Approved (date): Disapproved (date):
Recommended by WRB (circle one): YES NO
Comments (use additional sheet if necessary)
Approved by Watershed Administrator. (sign)
Date:

T
.60, 01
-Z
I v

A C I Nitrogen Control Plan - July 2009
Method 2: CommercisUlndustriaURecidenttal Sites with Known Impervious Area
Project Name: ���JN —4: ftA�- P4 Date:
Applicant: HA (AEdA SrAdKr- JM ENG, PC, , Telephone:
Part L Riparian Buffets
Does site contain riparian buffers? [ j No
Part IL Nitrogen Calculation
[ ] Yes (show buffers on plan) ( ] Exempt (show basis for exemption)
Item
Proposed Site Information
Area acres
1
Total pro 'ect acreage
Existing forest land
2
Total Proposed impervious area
Ibs/a
3
Existing impervious area (prior to 3/9/01)
4.4
4
i 'ous area tem 2 - Item 3
umnown meadow, wetlands, buffers) (Item 5)
5
anentl tested undisturbed o n ace
&e:
Existing cropland
6
anentl protected managed open space
1.2
Pm-Develop Loading
Type of Land Cover
Area
acres
TN export coefficient
bs/ad
TN export from use
Existing forest land
Stormwater Wetland
1.7
Ibs/a
Existing pasture
Permanently protected undisturbed open space (forest,
4.4
0.6
Existing residential
umnown meadow, wetlands, buffers) (Item 5)
7.5
20
Existing cropland
Permanently protected managed open space
13.6
1.2
Existing commerciaUndustrial
(pm, landscaping, etc.) (Item 6)
13
Dry lkteation
TOTAL
Impervious surfaces (roads, parking lots, driveways,'
212
Nitrogen
Loading Bate'
I Nitrogen Loading Rate (ibslaCtyr) = Total TN export rmm axe (10W) r Total Area (asses)
Post-Development Loading
before BMPs and/or Offset Payments
Type of Land Cover
Area
TN export coefficient
TN export from
Stormwater Wetland
(acres)
Ibs/a
use (Ibs/
Permanently protected undisturbed open space (forest,
0.6
35
umnown meadow, wetlands, buffers) (Item 5)
Crass Swale
20
Permanently protected managed open space
20
1.2
50' Restored or AdditioiW Riparian buffer w/L.evel Spreader
(pm, landscaping, etc.) (Item 6)
Dry lkteation
1 10
Impervious surfaces (roads, parking lots, driveways,'
212
roofs, paved storage areas, etc.) (Item 4
TOTAL - - - - -----------
--------------- - - - --
rem 7)
(Item 8
Nitrogen Loading Rate (lbs/adyr) (Equals Item 8 = Item 7)
BNEPType
TN Removal Rate %,
Check which a
Wet Pond
25
Stormwater Wetland
40
Sand Filter
35
Bioretention
35
Crass Swale
20
Vegetated Fdter Strip w/Level Spreader
20
50' Restored or AdditioiW Riparian buffer w/L.evel Spreader
1 30
Dry lkteation
1 10

Amount of Offset (Pounds of Nitrogen) [Item 10 x (Item 1— Item 3) x 30 years]
*Please refer to the link below to determine the procedure for payment of the nitrogen offset payment. It is necessary for applicants to
demonstrate compliance with SL 2009 -337, which indicates that applicants must fast purchase offset credits through private
mitigation banks. If no such credits are available, applicants may then buy their offset credits from the NC EEP. These banks are listed
by basin and further information regarding this session law can be found at the following link:
httpJ/tesLnceep.net/pages/ILFJProgram—mtro.huW
Part M. Control of Peak Stormwater Flow
Calculated Pre-development Peak Flow (1 -year)
Calculated Post - development Peak Flow without Controls (1 -year)
Calculated Post - development Peak Flow with Controls (1 -year)
Calculations and details showing control of nitrogen and peak stormwater runoff control must be included.
Part IV: Watershed Development Permit
1. Total project acreage (in Lake Benson Watershed) 041
2. Total proposed impervious surface (in Lake Benson Watershed) 0,1S
3. Existing impervious surface (in Lake Benson Watershed) ; 0.03
4. Equivalent project acreage (Item 1— Item 3) 0.%
5. New impervious surface (Item 2 — Item 3) f
6. Percent impervious [(Item 5 _ Item 4) x 1001 "• o
* Limited to impervious surface existing before 7/1193
I, the undersigned, certify that to the best of my knowledge that the above information is correct (affix seal)
To be filled in by staff
Project Watershed Protection Requirements
Project Exempt: Explain
(sign)
Project Located in Lake Benson Conservation District — LBCD (Critical Area) Standards Apply
Project Located Outside LBCD — On -site treatment required.
Minor Variance Requested (WRB) Approved (date): Disapproved (date):
Major Variance Requested (EMC) Approved (date): Disapproved (date):
Recommended by WRB (circle one): YES NO
Comments (use additional sheet if necessary)
Approved by Watershed Administrator. (sign)
Date:
Post-Development Loading after BMPs andfor Offset Payments
Item
Description
Nitrogen Loading Rate bs/ac/
9
Nitrogn load after BMPs show separately in detail
10
Nitrogen load offset by ents [Item 9 — 3.6
Amount of Offset (Pounds of Nitrogen) [Item 10 x (Item 1— Item 3) x 30 years]
*Please refer to the link below to determine the procedure for payment of the nitrogen offset payment. It is necessary for applicants to
demonstrate compliance with SL 2009 -337, which indicates that applicants must fast purchase offset credits through private
mitigation banks. If no such credits are available, applicants may then buy their offset credits from the NC EEP. These banks are listed
by basin and further information regarding this session law can be found at the following link:
httpJ/tesLnceep.net/pages/ILFJProgram—mtro.huW
Part M. Control of Peak Stormwater Flow
Calculated Pre-development Peak Flow (1 -year)
Calculated Post - development Peak Flow without Controls (1 -year)
Calculated Post - development Peak Flow with Controls (1 -year)
Calculations and details showing control of nitrogen and peak stormwater runoff control must be included.
Part IV: Watershed Development Permit
1. Total project acreage (in Lake Benson Watershed) 041
2. Total proposed impervious surface (in Lake Benson Watershed) 0,1S
3. Existing impervious surface (in Lake Benson Watershed) ; 0.03
4. Equivalent project acreage (Item 1— Item 3) 0.%
5. New impervious surface (Item 2 — Item 3) f
6. Percent impervious [(Item 5 _ Item 4) x 1001 "• o
* Limited to impervious surface existing before 7/1193
I, the undersigned, certify that to the best of my knowledge that the above information is correct (affix seal)
To be filled in by staff
Project Watershed Protection Requirements
Project Exempt: Explain
(sign)
Project Located in Lake Benson Conservation District — LBCD (Critical Area) Standards Apply
Project Located Outside LBCD — On -site treatment required.
Minor Variance Requested (WRB) Approved (date): Disapproved (date):
Major Variance Requested (EMC) Approved (date): Disapproved (date):
Recommended by WRB (circle one): YES NO
Comments (use additional sheet if necessary)
Approved by Watershed Administrator. (sign)
Date:

Lake
Benson
Aversboro PS Site
PIN: 1710011723 000
Real Estate ID: 0168543
Map Name: 171017
Owner. GARNER TOWN OF
Mailing Address 1: PO BOX 446
Mailing Address 2. GARNER NC 27529 -0446
Deed Book: 03733
Deed Page: 0304
Deed Date: 0528/1988
Deeded Acreage: 0.49
Assessed ,Building Value: $0
Assessed Land Value* $14,700
Total Assessed Value: $14,700
Billing Class EXEMPT
Property Description: PROP TOWN OF
GARNER
Heated Area: 0
Site Address: 2390 AVERSBORO RD
white
Deer
Park
Township: ST. MARYS
Year Built: 0
Total Sale Price: $0
Land Class: EXEMPT
Old Parcel Number: 726- 00000 -0444
N
A
D 50 100 200 Feet
1 inch =100 feet
01SC14101 er
dWaps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate Information possible.
However, the maps are produced fcrirdormadon purposes.
and are NOT surveys No warranbes, expressed or imp#"
are provided for the data therein, its use, or its irderpretatfon.

Jeremy A. Allen, PE
Highfill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C. 2703 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 201, Cary, NC 27518 -New as of 12/16/2011
Ph 919-481 -4342 Fax [phone] jallen (ahieoc.com I www.h+eoc.com
Please consider the natural environment before printing this e-mail.

L,V�----jMULKEY
CNGINEERS & CONSULTANTS
NITROGEN CALCULATIONS
White Deer Park Greenway
for
Garner Parks & Rec
.August 2009
1\ A-ey Engineers & Consultants
PO Box 33127
Raleigh, ITC 27636
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]

qLKEY
C!_I-:S11i.TAN 1 r;
Existing Conditions (per Stewart Engineering prior analysis)
Protected Open 0.00 ac
Managed Open 87.01 ac
Impervious 4.40 ac
Total Project Area 91.41 ac
Type of Land Cover
Areas(acres)
TN export coefficient
TN export from use
Ibslac/ r
Ibs/ r
Permanently protected
0.000
0.60
0.000
undisturbed open space
(forest, unmown
meadow)
Permanently protected
87.010
1.2
104.412
open space
(grass, landscaping,
etc.
Impervious
4.400
21.2
93.280
surfaces(roads, parking
lots,
driveways, roofs, paved
storage areas, etc.)
TOTAL
91.410
- --
197.692
Total Nitrogen Export= 2.16 Iblaclyr

E:N{�ti•l
1::k -12b .t IiO N;i li LTA N113
Proposed Conditions
Protected Open 0.00 ac
Managed Open 86.37 ac
Impervious 5.04 ac
Total Project Area 91.41 ac
Type of Land Cover
Areas(acres)
TN export coefficient
TN export from use
Ibs/ac/ r
ibs! r
Permanently protected
0.000
0.60
0.000
undisturbed open space
(forest, unmown
meadow)
Permanently protected
86.37
1.2
103.644
open space
(grass, landscaping,
etc.
Impervious
5.04
21.2
106.848
surfaces(roads, parking
lots,
driveways, roofs, paved
storage areas, etc.)
TOTAL
91.410
---
210.492
Total Nitrogen Export = 2.30 Ib /aclyr
Net Increase In Total Nitrogen =0.14 ibs /ac /yr

Attachment 3
Excerpt from Land Quality Section of
EA Document

Kimley -Hom
M and Associates. Inc.
5.3 Land Use
With the exception of the Aversboro pump station, the proposed project will parallel
existing easements or roadways. Existing easements will have to be widened in some
locations to accommodate the new utility lines, but this should not result in a significant
change from the current land use. The existing Aversboro pump station is located within
an area that is currently cleared and maintained. The proposed project will not result in a
change of use from its currently designated use.
The proposed project is primarily intended to meet the additional wastewater capacity
that is currently necessary within the PSA and secondarily account for the additional
capacity demands at basin build -out projected for 2036. This project will support future
developments within the PSA that require wastewater disposal, and as a result there will
be some indirect and cumulative impacts associated with the project. It is expected that
residential development within the PSA will be limited to areas that have been zoned for
this kind of growth. The majority of the PSA is zoned for residential development, as
reflected on the zoning maps for the Town of Garner and Wake County, included as
Figures 6 and 7.
Much of the PSA is already in residential development. Once the new force main and
pump station improvements are built, the increased capacity may allow for easier
development within areas that may otherwise have limited development potential due to
wastewater disposal requirements. The area south of Buffaloe Road is most likely to be
subject to increased short-term development pressure as a result of the proposed project.
This area is currently zoned for residential development. The type of indirect effects that
could be expected include such changes as loss of forest habitat, increases in
imperviousness and stormwater flows, increased erosion and in- stream sediment loads,
increases in nutrient and pollutant levels in receiving waters, loss of wildlife habitat, and
impacts to wetlands and streams.
There is also potential for long -term growth- induced development resulting from the
proposed activity. These effects could include additional force main or gravity sewer
connectors that extend service beyond the currently proposed line, resulting in additional
new development and redevelopment, such as the conversion of low- density residential
areas or golf courses to a higher density use, or the development of commercial areas to
support increase residential uses. The secondary effects of redevelopment may not be as
extensive as new development because it does not always require the conversion of forest
land to another use, but it would still likely result in increases in stormwater due to
greater imperviousness, losses in wildlife habitat, etc.
Based upon Town of Garner zoning maps overlain on 2012 aerial photography,
approximately 85% of the existing PSA is developed with approximately 80% in
residential development and 5% in commercial/industrial development. The remaining
15% of the existing PSA is currently undeveloped, forested land which is primarily zoned
for residential development. It is assumed the majority of the development that will be
brought about in the short term by the proposed project will occur within these
20

Kimley -Horn
C i� �� and Associates. Inc
undeveloped areas located in close proximity to the City of Raleigh's existing gravity
interceptors. Developers in these areas will incur the costs of running new sewer lines in
order to tap into the City's gravity interceptors. Based upon the same reasoning, areas
that are farther away from the City's existing gravity interceptors are less likely to be
immediately affected by the proposed project. Residential development within the PSA
is likely to occur even without the proposed project. New residential developments are
required to connect to City sewer if service is available. If this project were not
completed, the City would be capacity limited and would not be able to extend services to
these undeveloped areas which would then utilize septic or community based sewer
systems. This residential growth would likely be less dense than with the proposed
project would still contribute to secondary and cumulative impacts within the PSA.
Expected secondary and cumulative effects are anticipated to be typical of those
associated with residential development. However, growth within the PSA is limited due
to the amount of existing development. Therefore, it is not expected that there will be
measurable cumulative or secondary effects associated with new development within the
PSA or along the force main corridor.
The PSA lies within the Swift Creek watershed, and its land uses are dictated by the
Swift Creek Land Management Plan ( SCLMP). The SCLMP is an agreement among all
governments within the drainage basin that outlines development standards for the Swift
Creek watershed.
Overall, the level of restriction on development within the Neuse River Basin and Swift
Creek watershed is much greater than surrounding areas, particularly given the relatively
close proximity of the PSA to metropolitan areas. The anticipated secondary and
cumulative effects typically associated with expected residential development can be
offset by the proper implementation and enforcement of current regulations. Impacts to
natural resources associated with any future development will be subject to review by
federal, state, and local regulatory agencies and will be required to implement avoidance
or minimization techniques.
5.4 Wetlands
No wetlands are located within the project corridor and no direct impacts to wetlands will
result from the proposed project.
It is anticipated that the secondary and cumulative effects of this project will be
negligible. Proper implementation of the erosion control BMPs should prevent the loss
of sediment to adjacent areas, and the restoration of the site to preconstruction grades will
prevent changes to the hydrology of surrounding areas.
5.5 Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands
As defined in the USDA Wake County Soil Survey (1970), Prime Agricultural
Land may be cultivated land, pastureland, or forestland. It cannot be urban or developed.
21

Attachment 4
Letter from Wake County Environmental
Services

WAKE
COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Mr. Taylor,
I have reviewed the plans for the Aversboro Pump Station Improvements and Parallel
Force Main project. I have determined that the project is exempted from doing a Flood
Study or FEMA Certification based on the following facts.
1. No structures will be constructed in FEMA flood plain with the exception of the
buried force main.
2. There will be no net fill in the FEMA flood plain as the force main will be buried
and graded to the existing topography.
If you have any further questions please contact me.
6" a�
Charles D Phillips
Environmental Engineer / Consultant
Sedimentation & Erosion Control
Division of Water Quality
Wake County Environmental Services

Figures

i Rd axwell Dr vemont 70 W N
0 r
i Grovemont d
o s
a e n
e ends /
Si °I s o
ins Rd oo Ian d re t °
a
H e u A a mY St , rk e c
0 �m /� c
0
o �
p a
3 <.
0 o is
pr y
401 c SP1ir d
v
Ja ora 4�m i o e Dr ° 50
Leek < L o Atchis o,
G V
avkwaY Or Project Begins on Thompson Rd
near White Deer Park
to
ha
m ,ems
0
Sto
d H me In a
cha%%en9
R Lake Benson
ate
Legend g �i �.�
d
rt
Project Area
1,500 3,000 Fee
Mir Ra d Rd
G NVILL
LAMANCE
ORANGE DURHAM FRANKLIN
NASH
i
WAKE
CHATHAM WILSON
/ JOHNSTON
�—OOR LEE HARNETT WAYNE
Prepared By: Aversboro Pump Station Improvements Prepared For:
Kimley -Horn
`�� and Associates, Inc. and Force Main Project
Figure 1 - Vicinity

00
4 S7
t7
0 ewmca=
0
aftum
I C:
7 I 750
1 1,50
1 —
Feet I
61
0.-
ox
+A
1 (17
st
0
cl. geN haven
e'\
gk3nhaven Dr
Af
A
A

N
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLI • — S ET NUMBS m 'w � e
,
Ce�2 APB? , CeB e
M, CeB2
CPU:. J
Stream enters
Ce culvert
A t;2
i tir' CeH2
r '. • ', AWOL
10 50 100
AliEil I I I
f
' Feet
'
APB �� _ • GeC2
'ystreamaA , f
= P C LdG2
e132 Ap132
C� Q
1 ,
" X Offsite Waters
s CIC
App
n r�p(r
ApB2 2 50 100
W
APC2 I/ Feet
A C' ( AF)d
,eC
_,n
`� Pg
es
CeC2~ o ,IC 3
c
! 116
ag' CeC2 0 o ,y
f' M e 1
ApC ,, `� • CI63
I
ApQ
Legend
r ,, {ate `, c� � .' ► �:"'
1 �
Project Boundary
Steam Corridor s_ �eD �`, .e.
Wetland CeF f ` CeG2 ' F CeB
'LaD
y 0 750 1,50 �Qr �� co
I I CeC — -. ... `�
` Feet E;eB2 ,�,.��f u Q, AnC9 r
Prepared By: Aversboro Pump Station Improvements
C_FJ Kimley -Horn and Parallel Force Main Pro ect Prepared For:r
and Associates, Inc. j +
Figure - N RCS Soil Survey - Wake n ty (197

Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination

Regulatory Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403 -1343
Action ID: SAW -2012 -01160
City of Raleigh Public Works
Alta: Eileen Navarrete
Post Office Box 590
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 -0590
Dear Ms. Navarrete:
July 20, 2012
Enclosed, is the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for the Aversboro Pump Station
and Force Main in Garner, Wake County, North Carolina. Please cite Action ID: SAW -2012-
01160 when referring to this project in the future.
Should you have any questions please call me at the Raleigh Field Office at 919 -554 -4884
Extension 35.
Sincerely,
Craig Brown
Regulatory Specialist
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
cc:
Kimley -Hom & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Beth Reed
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, North Carolina 27513

Re f "rte, = D :
ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 1 J I 11;-0 E z
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
Attn: Beth Reed, PWS, on behalf of the City of Raleigh
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, NC, 27636 -3068
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: Wake City: Garner
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.
35.672001 ° N, Long. 78.619400° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Lake Benson
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
r' Non- wetland waters: 44 linear feet: 5 -15 width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Intermittent (SA) and Perennial (SB)
v Wetlands: 0.09 acres.
Cowardin Class: Palustrine
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
[Field Determination. Date(s): Z'VI, l °I 20 {2,
1

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there °maybe "waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
appli t/consultant.
[?f ffice concurs with data sheetsidelineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ `USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1:24,000, Gamer
Quad and Lake Wheeler Quad.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:Wake County (1970).
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/F1RM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
of 1929)
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):2010 NAIP Aerial
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
7 ►R t2
Signature and dath of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
6/13/2012
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
1 f

Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount of
Class of
number
Latitude
Longitude
Class
aquatic
aquatic
resource in
resource
review area
SA
35.6750
- 78.6216
Riverine
23 linear feet
non - section 10
— non -tidal
SB
35.6687
- 78.6121
Riverine
21 linear feet
non - section 10
— non -tidal
WA
35.6720
- 78.6194
Palustrine
0.09 acres
non - section 10
— wetland

NCDWQ Buffer Determination
Documentation

Hartshorn, Jason
From: Richmond, Martin <martin.richmond @ncdenr.gov>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 3:00 PM
To: Reed, Beth
Subject: RE: Aversboro Pump Station and Force Main, Wake Co. - Preliminary JD and field
verification meeting request
"...but wanted to extend an invitation for you to attend..."
I appreciate that. If I had the time I would, but duty calls elsewhere.
As far as documentation goes, how's about this: according to the Neuse Buffer rules, if a stream is depicted on Topo or
Soils map, then it's subject to the buffers, period. The only way it becomes not subject is if an in- the -field determination
is conducted by DWQ to confirm the stream is not present in the field. So basically, since it's depicted on the map(s), it's
subject...
How's that sound to you?
Martin Richmond
NC Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh NC 27609
(919) 791 -4250
Email correspondence to and from this address Is subject to the Norm Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute orother regulation.
From: Beth.Reed @kimley - hom.com [mailto: Beth. [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 11:39 AM
To: Richmond, Martin
Subject: RE: Aversboro Pump Station and Force Main, Wake Co. - Preliminary JD and field verification meeting request
Hey Martin,
You are correct, there are two features and both would be subject. There are no other mapped /unmapped features in
the project area.
Since there is no question regarding subject features, I didn't think you would want to conduct a field review of the
project but wanted to extend an invitation for you to attend.
Is there some type of documentation from DWQ that confirms the two mapped features would be subject? We are
going to have to prepare an EA for this project and it would be helpful to have some type of documentation from DWQ if
possible.
Thanks,
Beth

From: Richmond, Martin [ mailto :martin.richmond @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 11:24 AM
To: Reed, Beth
Subject: RE: Aversboro Pump Station and Force Main, Wake Co. - Preliminary JD and field verification meeting request
Good morning Beth, hope you're doing well...
If I'm not mistaken, it looks like there's only two stream features depicted on the maps, and you've determined one to
be intermittent and one to be perennial. Both subject and no other features depicted?
This won't require a field visit unless you need to verify or clarify a top of bank or something like that. If we need a site
visit, I have Wednesday the 27th open in the a.m.
Martin Richmond
NC Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh NC 27609
(919) 791 -4250
Email correspondence to and from this address B subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute orotber regulation.
From: Beth.Reed @kimley- horn.com [mailto: Beth. Reed @kimlev- horn.coml
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 10:33 AM
To: James .C.Lastinger @usace.army.mil; Richmond, Martin
Cc: Eileen. [e-mail]; THiohfilI(@hiepc.com
Subject: Aversboro Pump Station and Force Main, Wake Co. - Preliminary JD and field verification meeting request
James and Martin,
On behalf of our client, the City of Raleigh, Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. (KHA) requests a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination for the Aversboro Pump Station and Force Main project located in Gamer, Wake
County. KHA would also like to request a field verification meeting to confirm wetland boundaries and two stream
determinations (perennial/intermittent) for these features that were delineated on February 22, 2012. Both stream features
are mapped on the USGS and NRCS soils mapping as intermittent and perennial streams. Lake Benson is located south of
the project area, and the delineated wetland is a headwater emergent wetland at the confluence of an unnamed tributary
and the fringe of Lake Benson.
The City of Raleigh proposes to expand the Aversboro pump station and construct approximately 8,200 linear feet of
force main along Buffaloe Road in Garner, NC. The project is located within the jurisdictional limits of the Town of
Gamer, Wake County, which has merged their sewer service with the City of Raleigh. A description of the project and its
associated jurisdictional features is included in the attached JD transmittal letter.
A Preliminary JD package is also attached for the project that includes:
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
• Signed Agent Authorization Letter
• Vicinity Map
• Aerial Photograph with Jurisdictional Features
• USGS Topographic Map
• USDA/NRCS Soil Survey
• NCDWQ Stream Identification Forms

a
• USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets
• USACE Wetland Determination Form
Figures:
• Vicinity Map
• Aerial Map (20 10)
• USGS Map
• NRCS Wake Co. Soil Map
Please provide several upcoming dates that you have available to meet. I will try to coordinate a date that works with
everyone's schedule.
Due to the large size of the attached files, if you would reply and confirm that you received this e-mail transmittal it would
be greatly appreciated. If you would like, I will be glad to send hard copies of the attached files if helpful.
Thanks for your assistance,
Beth Reed, PWS
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
(919) 677 -2073 - office
(919) 6247980 - cell
beth.reedOD-kimley- horn.com

Selected Permit Drawings

f 1 ►
STREAM 1
BUFFER ZONE 1 - 300 SQ. FT.
BUFFER ZONE 2 - 200 SQ. FT.,
m EX. INTERMITTENT STREAM.
DO NOT DISTURB WITHIN
BANKS. UTILIZE SHORING
m - AS NECESSARY.
- ss--- --ss
EASEMENT
ss
qv- $„ pVC!_� SANITARY SEWER ,
EIG
20 , CITY pF R If
m
m r1O
�
24 FORCE 2
MAIN. MIN. F
42` COVER
111ul
tilLl I-
`^•.
BUFF
TEMPORARY SILT
_ w - FENCE (TYP.)
(SEE 2 -01 /ED -1)
R� R/W
R/W_-.-.-- R/W
TOP OF BANK
I
+ rO 'A
�o \ 2F
2� va
J \
—iE
p
RD. 2 —�y-
_w-- -w
_w
TEMPORARY
REMOVE AND CHECK DAM
REPLACE EX. 2�04 1)
RIP -RAP.
REMOVE AND REINSTALL EX.
36" RCP TO NEAREST
AFFECTED PIPE JOINT.
ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
(IN FEST)
1 inch = 40 ft
160
Lo
1 -w w
i
BOUNDARY OF 50'
NEUSE RIVER I
RIPARIAN BUFFER I
�+ MID )
�s EX. TEL.
\ PEDESTALS
❑
EX
ss
R/w
0
r3
z
SILT FENCE o
STONE
r�
NOTE: THIS DRAWING CREATED
USING SHEET FM -1.2 OF
AVERSBORO PUMP STATION
IMPROVEMENTS AND PARALLEL
FORCE MAIN PROJECT DRAWINGS
FOR THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
I
I
I
I
I
e-
N I
A
• 1
$"
PVC _ ss -4 _
L_ R/w- --
Raw—R%N
FILTER
OUTLET E.O.P AND EX. ROW
2 02
)1) LINE SERVE AS LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE.
U.N.O
rall
R/w
R/w
E
w w w w -�- w
RIW R/N RIW
REMOVE AND
REINSTALL EX. STORM
CULVERTS TO
PRE - CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONS (TYP.)
NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT
DISTURBANCE TO 15' MAX. WIDTH
INSIDE BUFFER ZONES.
FONAL DEMON NOT RELEASED
FOR C OO NSTRUCTM
rA -SIN
Highfill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C.
2703 Jones Franklin Rd., Suite 201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27518
Tel: [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.hiepc.com
Firm License No. C -2586
0
Q
H
W U
LEI Z
OL''8
a LIJ J
? Q Of
1 Q O
O �
O U
0
IY
W
Z
N
O
O Z
r
� a
W
T
PROJECT NO.
RAL1004
1 OF 2

IF ' C 0,
11111
1110