Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130411 Ver 1_USFWS Comments_20130516United States Department of the Interior 46 o HSI-I AND WILDLIFE SF.RVICL a � Raleigh I field Office s ,�A� Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, Noith Carolina 27636 -3726 May 16, 2013 Mi, Andiew Williams, Project Manager Wilmington Regulatory Division U S Army Carps of Engmeei s 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Subject Wildlands Engineering, Inc - Lower Swepsonville Dam Mitigation Bank Draft Prospectus Dear Mr Williams This responds to Monte Matthews' email of April 17, 2013, requesting comments on the draft prospectus for Wildlands Engineering Inc.'s Lower Swepsonville Dam Mitigation Bank The U S Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the draft prospectus, and attended a meeting to discuss the project at the Corps office on May 13, 2013. Kathy Matthews will be the Interagency Review Team (IRT) member for this mitigation bank. At the May 13, 2013 meeting, Kathy provided copies of the Service's "Haw River Sediment Quality Assessment" (July 2011), and a "Preliminary Sediment Survey" (August 28, 2008), which was prepared for the Service by Restoration Systems. At this tune, the Service does not have any concerns for impacts to federally - listed species from this project Our concerns relate to consistency with other proposed dam removal projects, and potential impacts to downstream habitat and fisheries from contaminated sediment 1 The South But Itngton Wastewater Tieatment Plant (WWTP) is located within the impoundment of the dam in Big Alamance Creek. The Service is concerned about potential ramifications to the WWTP's NPDES permit limits, as well as potential water quality and sediment impacts from the WWTP. We recommend that the facility's NPDFS permit be examined to deter mine whether the permit limits were formulated assuming impoundment of Big Alamance Creek, or low flow of the stream. The Service's 2011 sediment quality assessment indicated acutely -toxic contamination downstream of the WWTP. The sediment removal management plan for the mitigation bank should include sediment testing within the impoundment and consultation with the resource agencies to determine whether sediment should be removed 2 At the May 13, 2013 meeting, the sponsor indicated that more conservation easements may be purchased along the impoundment The Service recommends that in order to receive credit for the approximately 2,570 linear feet of tributaries proposed, the tributaries should be protected with conservation easements and a 50 -foot forested buffer on each side of the channel We also encourage the establishment of 50 -foot forested buffers and conservation easements on as much of the Haw maulstem and Big Alamance Creek as possible. Even with forested buffers and conservation easements, the Service would be concerned about allowing 1.1 credit ratios for tributary leaches that aie deeply incised We look forward to viewing the impounded areas and discussing potential credit ratios at that time 3 In general, the Service does not have concezns with structuung available credits around goals of the project (reestablishment of flow, water quality improvement, fish passage, etc ) Howevei, we caution that all goals and success ciiteiia should be quantifiable and icasonable, and the amount of credits offered foi teaching the goals should be appropiiate foi the level of effort and measured level of improvement We look forward to discussing potential goals, success criteria, and available credits 4 The Service anticipates that the mitigation plan will include, at a minimum, proposals for monitoring of water quality, sediment quantity, quality, and movement, vegetation recruitment and invasive plants, shoreline stability, fish passage, and habitat quality. In addition, remedial plans should be included, should the provides fail to meet stated goals and success criteria, or if adverse impacts aie discovered Thank you foi the oppoitunrty to comment on this project. We look foiwaid to the field visit and future opportunities foi input. If you have any questions concerning these comments, please contact Kathy Matthews at (919) 856 -4520, Ext 27, of by e -mail at <kathryn_matthews @fws gov> Sin ely' Pete B amin Field Supervisor cc* Todd Bowei s, USEPA Rosemary Hall, USEPA Sue Homewood, NCDWQ Eric Kulz, NCDWQ Dolores Hall, NC Office of State Aichaeology Shad Biyant, NCWRC