820039_Routine Inspection_20210730

1MS a
Facility Number
Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit:
Reason for Visit:
Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
Farm Name: WLI 1LN Mitre
Owner Name: 61 t 1 UJ1 ITC, NJ
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C I PM
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:Al Region: FP)
Title: 1Tc(1 c��'2 -
Onsite Representative: 31 l JJ tt1.pJ
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: recAje
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish (I?D''-O
Q 'U
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Wet Poultry
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) n Yes 11 No ❑ NA 0 NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes tl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
37
❑ Yes 'NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Nq No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 2„ Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
3,'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes iv No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA
❑ Yes 11 No ❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ Yes n, No ❑ NA
▪ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside ofAc`ceptableCrop Window ❑ Evi ence ofWind Drift ❑ Application Outside ofApproved Area
12.Cro T e(s): C1 � JL",( r�I7r)
P YP
13soTe(,): NOff&'R(A)ag!a'n
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? n Yes No ❑ NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No 0 NA
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n Yes No ❑ NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 Yes No ❑ NA
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
El Yes No 0 NA
20. Does the facility fail
the appropriate box.
❑WUP
❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
n Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Trans s
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n Yes N
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes
Page 2 of 3
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
0 Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
2/4/2015 Continued

Date of Inspection: 'it //
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the perm.
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
No NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Ilk No
• Yes'tV No
❑ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Corm
Use d
explain any YES answers and/+
wr explain situations; (us addition
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA ❑NE
ISR„ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
1VT�
e
e IDNI 4a g0,9\1
,kOYK or! bcinK IO&fK oad.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
�1� �tPye ju\itor\I
Phone
Date: -
Page 3 of 3 U 2/4/2015