20120789 Ver 1_Emails_20130529

AK
May 29, 2013
Emily Greer
USACE
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West 5t" Street
Washington, NC 27889
Roberto Scheller
NCDENR -Dept. of Water Quality
Washington Regional Field Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Subject: First Revision to Authorizations SAW- 2013 -0057 (USACE) and 13 -010 (NCDWQ)
Piedmont Natural Gas Line 5B Looping Project
Johnston, Wayne, and Greene Counties, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Greer and Mr. Scheller,
-- I I V-
� NO
This letter is in reference to the Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) Line 5B Looping Project. The project
entails construction of approximately 25 miles of natural gas pipeline in Johnston, Wayne, and Green
Counties, North Carolina. The Project consists of approximately 25 miles of 12 -inch diameter natural gas
pipeline from Piedmont's Bentonville Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Plant in Johnston County
(35.328916 °N, 78.264026 °W) continuing cross country through Wayne County, and ending at
Piedmont's Junction B interconnect ( 35.496219 0N, 77.757180 °W) in Greene County. The Project will
loop PNG's existing 10 -inch Line 5B Pipeline to provide additional capacity to the growing area of
Goldsboro, NC. Although being permitted as one project, in an effort to minimize
construction /operational impacts on the local community, the project has been divided into two
segments; Line 58 Loop West and Line 58 Loop East. The "West" segment will begin at the Bentonville
LNG Plant and will parallel PNG's existing Line 5B Right -of -Way (ROW) where feasible for approximately
12 miles where it will tie back into the existing Line 5B at PNG's Junction E site (35.385795 0N,
78.099343 °W), located at the intersection of Old Smith Field Road and Rosewood Road in Wayne
County. At this Junction PNG will use the existing Line 5B Pipeline to transport natural gas through the
greater Goldsboro area. The "East" segment will begin at a new pipeline "Junction" to be located along
NC Highway 111 (35.433066 0N, 77.962990 °W), approximately 670 -feet North of the intersection of
Cotton Wood Drive. The Project then continues cross country paralleling the existing Line 5B ROW
where feasible in an easterly direction for approximately 13 miles into Greene County, terminating at
PNG's Junction B Compressor Station in Snow Hill, NC.
5020 Ritter Rosa, €t 206, Mechanicsburg, A 17055 t. 71 t 458, 035 f, 117,307,3463
West Trenton, NJ I Holly Springs, NS I Aiken, SS I East Kingston, NH I Mechanicsburg, PA I Holliston, MA

Greer /Scheller
Page 2 of 4
Permitting History
AK Environmental, LLC (AK), on the behalf of PNG submitted a Pre - Construction Notification for the
impacts to waters of the U.S. in accordance with Nation Wide Permit (NWP) No. 12 and the
corresponding North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC 3884) was submitted to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) on
January 29, 2013. Piedmont received authorization by the NCDWQ (DWQ Project No. 13 -0101) and the
USACE (Action ID SAW- 2013 -0057) on February 22, 2013 and March 7, 2013, respectively.
Need for Route Revision
During the initial route planning stage, Biologist and Archaeologists from AK investigated 29.13 miles
(46.88 kilometers) of mainline route, including reroutes, 18.3 miles (29 kilometers) of proposed access
roads, 20.16 acres (8.16 hectares) of proposed pipeyards, and 73.9 acres (29.9 hectares) of proposed
additional temporary work spaces. For segments of the mainline route, where the proposed pipeline
parallels the existing Line 5B pipeline, AK surveyed a 270 -foot (82.3- meter) corridor. The 270 -foot survey
corridor was centered over the existing Line 5B 50 -foot permanent easement. Effectively, AK surveyed
two 110 -foot survey corridors located to the north and south of the existing easement. For segments of
the proposed pipeline that deviate from the existing Line 5B pipeline, a 300 -foot (90- meter) corridor was
surveyed. AK surveyed a 33 -foot (10- meter) corridor for all unimproved access roads.
Following the Phase I Cultural Investigation, AK identified and recorded 32 new archaeological sites and
16 isolated finds. In addition, AK relocated three previously recorded sites. AK recommended avoidance
or further testing to determine their eligibility for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP) for 18 of the sites. AK and PNG developed reroutes and other Project design changes to avoid
affecting these sites.
Two proposed reroutes around Site 31JT389 and 389 ** and Site 31GR211 came into question by project
stakeholders (i.e. landowners). Site 31JT389 & 389 * *, located approximately 1,300 feet East of the
Scout Road crossing, is a high density prehistoric site with a low density historic component located
across a large finger ridge overlooking the Mill Creek floodplain. Analysis of the artifact assemblage
indicates the site was occupied during the Late Archaic, and the Early, Middle, and Late Woodland
periods. Site 31GR211 consists of a high density prehistoric artifact scatter located in a mature second
growth forest with thick undergrowth, and an adjacent agricultural field. The site is located at the end of
Cow Town Drive. AK recommended avoidance or further testing to determine if the site is eligible for
inclusion in the NRHP for Site 31JT389 & 389* *Subsequently, AK surveyed and Piedmont adopted
reroutes to the south that would avoid impacts to the high research potential areas of each site.
During land acquisition agreements, the affected landowners requested that the proposed line parallel
the existing Line 5B easement. Therefore PNG contracted AK to perform a Phase II Investigation at each
of these sites. Further investigation and verbal communication with the North Carolina State Historical
Preservation Office (SHPO) revealed that these site are not eligible for inclusion of the NRHP, thus the
proposed route was adjusted to parallel the existing easement. Copies of the SHPO concurrence letters
are included in Attachment A.

Greer /Scheller
Page 3 of 4
Revised Impacts
As a result of the proposed revisions, four additional wetlands (W200, W201, and W222) that were
identified during the initial biological survey and one newly delineated wetland (W301) will now have
temporary and permanent impacts. However, paralleling the existing easement and reducing the Limit
of Disturbance (LOD) in these areas have minimized the impacts. Wetlands W200, W201, and W203 are
located between Sta. 80 +00 and Sta. 81 +00 of the Western Segment of the Project. Impacts to W200
will result in 0.04 acres of permanent and 0.01 acres of temporary impacts, while W201 will result in
0.01 acres of permanent impacts only. W200 and W201 are essential the same wetland, but are
hydraulically disconnected by an existing access road. In contrast, the proposed temporary and
permanent impacts to wetland W203 will be reduced by 0.07 acres and 0.03 acres, respectively.
Wetlands W222 and W301 are located between Sta. 500 +00 and Sta. 513 +00 of the Eastern Segment.
Crossing wetland W222 will result in 0.05 acres of permanent and 0.05 acres of temporary impacts,
while crossing W301 will result in 0.04 acres of permanent and 0.01 acres of temporary impacts. All
permanent impact described her are a result of permanent conversion from a forest wetland to an
emergent wetlands. Although not considered a "loss" of waters of the U.S. conversions are still
considered a permanent impact. All temporary impacts will be allowed to return to their
preconstruction vegetative state, following construction activities. Revised alignment sheets and
revised impact tables are included in Attachment B and C, respectively. Data forms for the additional
stream and wetland Impacts are included in Attachment D. A Summary of the impacts is summarized
below:
Impact Summary:
Wetlands
Total Previously- Authorized Impacts (acres)
Total Revised Project -wide Impacts (acres)
Temporary Permanent Conversion
Temporary
Permanent Conversion
25.25 12.52
25.29
12.59
Streams
Total Previously- Authorized Impacts (If)
Total Revised Project -wide Impacts (If)
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
3,315
105
3,395
110
Mitigation
The proposed revision will result in a net increase 0.07 additional acres of permanent conversion
impacts and 5 linear feet of permanent stream impacts. The additional temporarily impacted areas will
be allowed to return to their preconstruction vegetative state. Because the additional impacts specified
are below the compensatory mitigation requirement, mitigation beyond that already proposed and
accepted with the original application (purchase of 9.50 acres of mitigation credit from the NCEEP)
should not be required. In addition, to returning to the existing PNG 5B easement, a reduce construction
corridor (i.e. neck -down) has been incorporated, thus reducing impacts to a minimum.

Greer /Scheller
Page 4 of 4
Should you have any questions or require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me
by phone at 717.574.8847 or email at sryan @ak- env.com. Thank you for your assistance on this Project.
Sincerely,
Seth Ryan
Consulting Specialist
Enclosures: Attachment A— SHPO Concurrence Letters
Attachment B — Revised Alignment Sheets
Attachment C— Revised Stream and Wetland Impact Tables
Attachment D — Stream and Wetland Data Forms
cc: Dave Vena (Piedmont Natural Gas)
Bahaa Ghuneim (URS Corporation)
Frank Betler (Piedmont Natural Gas)
Robert Baker (Environmental Inspector)

Attachment A
SHPO Concurrence Letters

H,IV 1o.�nq
*� QIINAN�x
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Pat McCrory, Governor
Susan W. Kl ttz, Secretary
Kevin Chem, Deputy Secretary
March 26, 2013
Seth Mitchell
AK Environmental, LLC
5020 Ritter Road, Suite 206
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
SMitchell a ak- env.com
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Management Summary, Archaeological Survey; Phase II Work Plans for 31JT389 &389 ** and
31 GR211; and 404/401 Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) (DWQ EXP. No. 13 -0101) for the
Piedmont Line 5B Loop Project; Johnston, Wayne, and Greene Counties, ER 12 -2106
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
Thank you for your letter of February 28, 2013, that details proposed Phase 11 Work Plans for 31JT389 &389 **
and 31GR211. On February 4, 2013, we received AK Environmental Staff Archaeologist Jonathan Libbon's
letter of January 31, 2013, accompanying the management summary for the archaeological survey of the
proposed pipeline. Days later we received a copy of the 404/401 Pre - Construction Notification for the pipeline
from Mr. Roberto L. Scheller of the Division of Land Quality, NCDENR.
We will begin our comments with the management summary of the archaeological survey, which we agreed to
review in advance of a full Phase I survey report because of the tight time -frame for the project.
During the course of the survey, 48 sites16 of them isolated finds —were located within the project area. An
additional three previously recorded sites, 31WY3 &31WY3 * *, 31W-Y4, and 31GR84 &84 * *, were revisited.
The following properties are determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places:
31 GR213
31 JT395
31 JT407
31GR214
31JT396
31WY493 &493 **
31GR215
31JT397 &397 **
31WY496
31 GR217
31 JT400
31 WY497
31 GR218
31 JT401 &401 **
31 WY499
31 GR219
31 JT402
31 WY502
31 GR220
31 JT403
31 WY503
31 JT391
31 JT404
31 WY504
31JT393
31JT405
31WY506
31 JT394
31 JT406
31 WY510
31 WY511
They are isolated finds, or sites with limited potential to contribute to the understanding of the area.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 iilall Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

Mr. Libbon has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted at these 16 sites. We
concur with this recommendation since these sites are not significant archaeological resources.
The following sites are recommended for avoidance orif they cannot be avoided, further archaeological
investigation to determine their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places:
31 GR211
31 GR212
31 GR216
31 GR84 &84 **
31JT389 &389 **
31JT390 &390 **
31JT392 &392 **
31JT398 &398 **
31 WY3 &3 **
31 WY4
31 WY492 &492 **
31 WY494
31 WY495 &495 **
31 WY498
31 WY500 **
31WY501 &501 **
31 WY505
31 WY508 **
Through project re- routes, horizontal directional drills, placement of protective mats, and other project- related
design changes, the majority of these sites have been successfully meted for avoidance. Should plans later
change, we request the opportunity for review and comment prior to any ground disturbing activities.
For two of the above -listed sites, 31JT389 &389 ** and 31GR211, line placement through the sites, parallel to
the original pipeline corridor, became the preferred route, necessitating additional archaeological investigations
to determine their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
We support the measures discussed in your letter of February 28, 2013, for this work, setting forth three loci
(Locus 1, Locus 2, and Locus 3) within each site.
Briefly, the measures described for work at the two sites are:
31TT389 &389 **
Locus 1: No more than 12 1x1 -m units; two near shovel tests N10W180 of B11, seven
across the testing area, and three judgmental
Locus 2: No more than 30 close - interval (5 m apart) shovel tests followed by no more
than 10 1x1 -m units
Locus 3: No more than 186 close - interval shovel tests followed by no more than 35
1x1 -m units
31 GR211
Locus 1: No additional work needed, because the majority of Phase I positive shovel
tests were on the north side of the corridor
Locus 2: No more than 26 close - interval shovel tests, followed by no more than nine
1x1 -m test units
Locus 3: A 1x2 -m unit near Test B70N1OE1O (possible cache); two 1x1 -m units near
Test B70N1 OE30, where a number of Mount Pleasant (Middle Woodland
time period) sherds were found; and an additional 12 units, for a total of 16
We understand the shovel tests will be used to refine placement of subsequent test units, and that we will be
contacted with their results and a test excavation strategy. We believe this is a thorough approach and look
forward to further consultation with you.
In addition, sites 31JT399 &399 ** and 31WY507 remain unassessed, but are in areas that have been dropped
from consideration. Because they will not be affected by the project as proposed, no further work is
recommended for them. We concur with this recommendation.

Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report should be forwarded to us for review and comment as
soon as it is available. The Phase 11 work may be included in this document, or submitted on its own. When
submitting the Phase I report please include a table listing all sites in permanent site number order (including
isolated finds), county, AK temporary site number, site name, recommendations for them, their status, and a
brief temporal description. Please note that sites 31JT389 &389 * *, 31JT390 &390 * *, 31JT392 &392 * *, and
31JT398 &398 ** are missing from the management summary's Table 4.
We understand a separate, Phase 11, report will be submitted detailing the investigations at 31JT389 &389 ** and
31 GR211.
Please submit site forms for both the revisits and newly recorded sites, attaching individual site maps and
artifact inventories to each, prior to submission of the report, or accompanying it. Please complete both new
and revisit forms for 31JT389 &389 ** and 31GR211.
Please consider not including copies of any future archaeological reports in permit application documents. Site
findings and locations may be discussed in general, but we prefer their locations not be specified, as these are
protected under State Statute (GS 70 -18).
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
a
,yRamona M. Bartos
cc: Jonathan R. Libbon, AK Environmental, LLC
R. L. Scheller, Division of Water Quality, NCDENR
Dave Vena, Piedmont Natural Gas

ins STA7r
Mwv � s
xrT16
Ql�nn+N
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
May 20, 2013
Jonathan R. Libbon
AK Environmental, LLC
5020 Ritter Road, Suite 206
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
ilibbon a,ak- env.com
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Management Summary: Phase II Archaeological Evaluation of the J. L. M. Farms Site
(31JT389 &389 * *) and the Baker Site (31GR211), Piedmont Natural Gas Line 5b Looping Project in
Johnston, Wayne, and Greene Counties, ER 12 -2106
Dear Mr. Libbon:
Thank you for your letter of April 16, 2013, enclosing a copy of the management summary for the Phase 11
evaluation of 31JT389 &389 ** and 31GR211.
After reviewing your summary of the shovel tests and test units excavated during this Phase 11 work, we concur
that those portions of the following properties within the proposed pipeline APE are determined not eligible
for listing in the National Register of Historic Places:
31JT389 &389 ** and 31GR211
Because the low density of material culture encountered, the limited number of diagnostic artifacts recovered,
and a lack of cultural features, limits these sites' ability to contribute to an understanding of the prehistory and
history of the area.
AK Environmental has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted in the portions
of these two sites within the proposed APE for the pipeline. We concur with this recommendation since these
site portions are not significant archaeological resources.
We, therefore, recommend no additional archaeological investigation be conducted at 31JT389 &389 ** and
31 GR211. Should project plans change, necessitating pipeline work within untested portions of
31JT389 &389 ** and 31GR211, please contact us.
We appreciate the manner in which phases of this project have been presented to us, and look forward to
receipt of the overall final report, incorporating all project phases in one volume. Two copies of this report
should be forwarded to us for review and comment.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 iila11 Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

Please submit sites forms for both the revisits and newly recorded sites, attaching individual site maps and
artifact inventories to each, prior to submission of the report, or accompanying it. Please complete both new
and revisit forms for 31JT389 &389 ** and 31GR211.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or renee.gledhill-
earlevnwncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
'Ramona M. Bartos
0
cc: Seth Mitchell, AK Environmental, LLC, (smitchell a,ak- env.com)
R. L. Scheller, Division of Water Quality
Dave Vena, Piedmont Natural Gas

Attachment B
Revised Alignment Sheets

S s" Q' t i
�. ran
�s142�ly'
Q+
f
��
I.
� 00 +88V, 3fJIlH�itlW
S s" Q' t i
�. ran
�s142�ly'
Q+
f
� /
# "
���
a3rnv��Y'° Ss,
Gt it
r�;

`��' r =a! • �fn r`L� `` px i i idd tt�l � i�c '( ��t11 S, N i, j I 1 i ` � �'
!0
N�jQtlt{ � v°3 "'
�t� �.{ '. 1 � � *, s�* \ I \ ?tid'�s�s;• �, ,�` ': u}4F� tlf (o � a "� .£4)?'�'4'P'�yS s',�u( ��y t, � A
�� � 2 o
z
a o
a �
J
° � o
N o >o
} .I }'I ! -r� t ;�,i I.'# 1 t,c4 i) 4 `.,_'§t} } L5 ' 7 yS i)1'✓t {t f( t, rd>� ,t) i yT\ i � !`�'t' }} ai sitalr }N {,, t 3N17H�1bW r ka � , �' fi . �_ @
Pt AMR n � m o z o
z S , }ic�y�� m o a
rc
0 Q
t g;' %A ?,,,
l {i{�( ,VI .,# 1''r \t` I ,,:`'I `~t,lf \ iJ tS t(r�isr sl'dd \ `yr lrsa;`ih r4}�nl"$: t`^ ` : " " "� A�,�. t>ii }s�}� 0 i1•r IRS
r i 4� }iP,
'{ r 91 ?�} \ 4u t(fi yq 1 - Y o
� \� � xS 1 ,i' " "I�L IjY ik `` s g�i I , f {
Jy.�`' � %`ft{ } \���i.
�� � —�
d1 \�\ �i:1F Sh �YRy y 1 r(i' , .S ;! t,y `*,,. \kl� ➢v1; ;..,, i y ��1 , _15 \t r tl)YE�ki }�d s s` st_ U'-;:� a {}1 .Mr- ,'+iP�, m
10 OM 3NIlHO1tlW s,
$S4fi t a,nu oldl� til(hJrtsl,,�it �L L't t\ >i \l L\ r f tv s=`
, ry ,
t tp;41 4;1 t�yEyl 4 t,Lly z ))�1txi lid,?`
II1
t�i14 {ft7
.th t ,tt��
2s 5t tP `-lj 91 S4 !h 11W +aii \ti 4 �„ \ EMUtkt.'i I &2{4 S 1,
t S } st m tt4tlts !°' tt *¢4` W y )U \£ � 7$s a '�.� j��y'i (t )vmlt ` `` �i�`, ��,(•4t }�I jt t i \ �� t, �, y> A is
kajl6a{ r3�1S1 1: ;�
sib ,t.` sr y+ _f t I Ili', ik nt
4
t {t 1i IriYt ,ttt {r. 4 s} a�th e s€ t.* } t vs 11 t
m�lt(t
`l�tt�f�t4, .. � �x , , A't� t j1yR`f+1#y�lV
Jti i4s11 s�,is4i } }rrf rl rtl0sls t,� 1 re l�} ��r s .� r �- n, i" �,' r lt'�sr�t a {,ty 1Rr�(r} #d4 k' y.
.gat i11 ? 'P''"err`�� � } i uj���„ �t�� i s,l t i4 f} � r t.�l` „�; _ 3
°vt{S4Sl �i
,St{
1 fi �' ... �� , I��
\} i(t r,t o- ys - i d
tt\
NMI ��� \r 1, I o
tk1,
���
011 �t �` °� Ai j d , �J d I o
chit ti }klte }4p \ I v1v 41{ —
Sat��`
gg�� I a , t
�41'Ul�«j�
MESA
mv
Of I v ( sS
Iy',I,I
\ o �s
4
as Kan
t % V' �twt ttl
It I {tta
I , t
/ �� iT"jtA z `�.}��: ! t �
°y I / (a S�It }`7 } `sr;r'(�
t i4 w a
%
} Wr 'fir` t tfr
\
{ I A ylsi� i ir'n��t 1 �d NR f ?
° i \
\'ttlttay }itt }lc}
not �� 1 HIM
Hal, a% 4 P t
. HaltlW
3
00 +OWNI
I
a
A �
�I \ n, }fat; s y't }� v c :t }11riiYdx i r t f v yi n
is vu, f iy r traJ' t S1{
`�
t r
..........f o
at b} ,A�1 t � �i}
1 1 I {fi r! tl {� v1,t
Ml
y r `�,rlo t;. i i4u', ` , {dhv r' .- �,S�IG \h 4'`i`,t�e+`-�r+,•;#5, -.
xf 4' A,i

to as
j o
Pw
s i- ao
1�
;z oz
1 l � OWN g
}Kk
3NIlH�1VW
MPTCHLINE 1 � 4
.,-� `�., i � " 11 �' � ✓; �k_ 1', '£���''�K������`�i1���tJi>�;1� ys �i� �+ iii ?�',rjt�s�s�t���� �t�`�ig �
•v \ a 1 ati�y� ?4�i �r
�ab
it 41
VIC
i
��.
n S 'gym }� a yllll }k kfi ��itt
�
i
�4'i�ri
k
}t5`�,i
z
c
t, t
HIS
s
a _ k �) , lr}`�)� � ,� l a` §@ S' � to a a��s {c. G}�>} � ar'• � ��1 ��� t�� a €,��s8 � atir titp„
a �i)'l? " '� th ���`✓ p ba} s ;'h a4�� '�`'i'�'= �41�.s. " " "�r�F 1��>}� (� ��
i w
jW s 'l a 3
I' �
1t a
l t��'� 8 ` � �• 1 �,,
k�61 fUkk l� 1 this at'kA ,V) s
ti°
�t'l�A
' l£ ,
'�a�
o
r �
� � 1 �
t 1
i'�
S ,�. �Ikr � � � - :`, j�' at` -� {� j;a a+� yri �� ,'�4 tits` �"� t� �t�s k, ' � �I "�• '^.-�.

1,
a
�41
l
0t6>g3 1,
WIND-
lk
\ rTO _
x
{
�{
r'
1�I 1
Ilk
1,

A, at $k?t it
WKt�o
ttn6 i
C)— a o
rco i
l o s�C� o o lz
r I LU
z a o z
�t1',i ciz
°
o u
{t ";o
t � a
jt
OO +E693NI1H�IVW
tt�r }, tsli f jl''�Ity 1$1 tritti rrt }�r +
� � _ ""�'�.
-
i
k;
t� {f 1f Y Ist 1II { t- {r''lC
t�
it
1
a' S
I °
�+s£, {�tt�,�
�s� �It t aV�d� u�ity2c \tig k`
fr ra�f '��t ttt4: rt 't i d qt Srl "1Y �iit�iti l iPd, — !a \SYSS`��ii
r t Y
z
w
, � y
�
1 r rt de r jr ft{ r tI 43ftr i,� yt i�st �A
}�o z.
It
I 1
M ,I s
/ r
, 4
/
�Yt�
gl I � v
MATC LINE 883 +00
{ns
r`. �t Y ; T o
ba 1 i�o

Attachment C
Revised Stream and Wetland Impact Tables

Y
o
0 on
ate+
`3
m o°
o
OE
OE
�
'ro v
c o
v c
E °6 o
v
.E v
E o c
o
m v
v
ro
3
.o
W N v
w
-o
on N U
——
v m
m` m
U
O
.N m>
.a
c O
.n f0 >
on
v O
Y v
a=
o 9
0 9
a
m 9
3
.gym
U 9
a
w
v
9
U
o
m
0 9
O
m
O
_
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
'0
c '°
a
a
v
a
a
a
a
a
a
o
CO
o w
-o
c
-o
c
m
0
c
0
-o
c
-o
c
m
c
c
0
c
c
a
x
x
x
V
E
ro
EE
ro
~
ro
E
ro
E
ro
E
ro
E
ro
E
ro
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
W
N.:'p
:
ry t0
C ^
C
t0 oo
C
ci
t0 N
ry ci
ul ^
N
ul N
t0
I�
N oW
oo m
t0
ip ci
t0 ^
I�
I�
N
ci O
ci o
C O
O m
W 3
!
oo ci
O C
ip
oo ci
m C
�y tp
^ N
ry ci
�I1
W I�
ry m
m
W ci
ip m
�y m
ry m
I�
ip m
ci N^
ry m
I�
m oo
O ci
w m
ry n
ry n
rn
'6
3
m N
m N
m N
m N
m
m
m
m
m
oo ci
m
oo O
m
m
Ol
m
Ol
O
Ol
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
w
oo
oo
.. Ti
w c.
E
E, `m
o
L W
u
W
'o
to
m a
O
�n
m
a
m
O
o�
O
o
N
o
J
H:C
Ln C
'Q
W
C
N U
f6
.
°
O
m
m
N
m
� �
O
3 Z
f6 �
Z }a
++ C
C 7
L
.6?:
N.: V
^3
ifl
O
oo
o�
o�
O
G
O
C
rn
a y
m
L
O
?
c
6
o^
3 ti
t
U
U
a
Cr
a
U
U
o
a
a
U
U
U
U
u
o C
O
U
U
Q H
Oq t
.2
3
V
z
to
to
U
U
O
W
W
C
CL
0
m
m
c
m
E
m
c
Q
m
c
Q
m
c
m
c
Q
CL y
`°
`°
f0
y
'c
'c
y
y
t;
t;
..
N m
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
E
v
v
E
E
LL O
c
c
c
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
on
0
m E
>
>
>
>
z
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
CL a `o
N
m
Y
E
E
H
u
= ro
U
H
u
w m
O v
v
O v
v
O v
H v
U
O v
H v
N
O
m
v
v
p
Z
O m
?
Z
0 m
^
.ti
O
O
O
N
O
m
O
N
O
m
O
0
O
O
m
N
tp
0
O
�Il
O
O
.ti
.ti
ti
n
O
L
ry�
N
ci
N
N
I
N
ci
ci
N
ci
ci
N
N
N

n
v
3
3
v
3
E
3
m
u
3
`v
3
v
v
Z
3
Z
0
0
O
o
v
'0 v
c n
o �
v E
�vv '^
w
> ° o
W > N
N OJ
O � N
p U m
3 �
o =
� v l
v
on
v � m
a
o � Q
v
av
o O
`o 0
O j U
v
E o
v
� o n
o v E
OD -O T
0
o
w E v
V E
0 W O
o c av+
a
E n
v
Fav *�
u
w>
c
v
ro u
E
'ro u
m Y
m Y
m Y
c
E r
m o t
y o`n
v o`n
O D
0 D
O D
v r—Oo
U
—"
v m
'o
m a
m a
.-
.-
.-
v v
v
rc
m°
v
�
�
a
E
a
E
a
E
a
E
a
E
a
E
a
E
a
E
a
E
a
E
a
E
p ao a
w c
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
N p
COL
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
p
a v
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
c w
rn
rn
N rn
m m
N
o
o
m
o
m
o
'o
w p
-p "
o
^ a
m N
00 M
a
N rn
m W
a o
�n
M m
,� �o
�
,�
�n
a
00 0
m
a N
3 c
M
o
W
o
o
o
a
o
^ m
o
^ m
o
^ m
o
^ N
o
^ o
00
00 M
J J .r
.. Ti
c C
m
u
CL c
w ra
Q
to
c
y a
$'
'O.
C$ ou
o
o
`.moo
N
N
m
p
E
°�
J
m
F
M'
ca
n C
w •p
C
J )
1,
N
(� L'
_
A
t0
N
m
tp
o
ci
N
N
tp
ci
O
Z
O
E
E:
w
a
Z
7
Z,
3
6
N
E v
p
$
w
rn
°
w
oa
o
°
w
a !v
m
c'..
m
m
F L Q
41
w
m
N
m
p
U
V9
3 ti
T, o
U
U
U
U
U
Vpi C
U :
.
C
CL
Q
c
3
O
w
w
c
CL
IS
a
m
m
a
a
a
a
m
a
o
CL y
Y
`°
`°
m
CL
c
c
c
E
E
c
c
c
c
c
N om;
v
E
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
wnn
o a
o
un
o
un
o
un
o
un
o
un
o
un
o
un
o
un
o
un
o
un
o
m E—
w—
K
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
o Ti
c a:`o
g a
E
_
w
u
C
t
O sue+ O.
O sue+ a
O sue+ O.
C
t0
O
E
�X
f0
m
u
E
Z
z.
E
E
E
m`
c E
ro
m`
z
X
w m
z t3
z t3
z t3
z t3
Z
y0
O
�
m
U
E ^.
D N
N
N
n
o
ci
.ti
m
o
N
ti
n
ti
00
ti
m
ti
m
ti
ti
�I1
ti
y — ry1
N
ci
ci
ci
ci
ci
ci
ci
ci
N
N
N
n
v
3
3
v
3
E
3
m
u
3
`v
3
v
v
Z
3
Z
0
0
O
o
v
'0 v
c n
o �
v E
�vv '^
w
> ° o
W > N
N OJ
O � N
p U m
3 �
o =
� v l
v
on
v � m
a
o � Q
v
av
o O
`o 0
O j U
v
E o
v
� o n
o v E
OD -O T
0
o
w E v
V E
0 W O
o c av+
a
E n
v
Fav *�

O
.0
N V
n
O
m
.ti
lfl
O
ci
O
n
Ol
n
q
O
�
m
Lq
ci
ci
� N
c�
m
ci
ci
l0
tp
n
m
L IL
F°-
O
O
O
O
ti
O
O
ti
ti
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H
U
'W
i
m C
U
!+
C I e
E
O
ci
ci
O
O
O
m
m
m
tp
ci
O
O
�I1
�I1
.ti
N
ci
ci
�I1
m
a U:
E N —
O
O
O
O
ti
O
O
ti
ti
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
H W
Ti
EL
E
O
C
y
W
C in
N
.ti
ei
l0
O
Ot
Ot
Vf
O
l0
Q
m E m'
E
o
o
o
o
a
ti
o
m
m
ti
o
ti
o
o
o
ti
o
`w 0
M w
c�
c
', ..
'Q
�
O
O
ti
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
c E --
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
v
Q
~ a
M
to
m
°
o
o.
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
p
U
U
U
p
U
U
U
U
Ln
c
O C
c
v
a
c
v
a
c
v
a
c
v
a
c
v
a
c
v
a
O
>
p
=
c
v
a
c
v
a
O
>
c
v
a
p
=
c
v
a
c
v
a
c
v
a
c
v
a
w o
„
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
O
O
a
O
O
O
O
O
c
o
V
� L
U
C7 �
O
i Z
W
`ti
m oo
°� �'
`ti N
°� �n
^ �n
^ °�
N °�
^ m
O �n
�o
^ oo
N C
oo N
ti
rn m
p
O
O�
ci
I�
O� 'o
w
'o `�
o O
m N
'o
N p
N m
t0 p
^
m
0
N�
O
tp N
t0 p
w
N N
m N0
O0
O
n
n
N^
^p
C
.o+
m
`~ O V
x E v
3
°�
m �
m �
m �
m �
m �
m
'o
a
3 v
�
=
- c
z
o
u
o
u
O
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
o
u
z
o
u
o
u
z
z
o
u
z
f6
u C
o O
'..B O
,
d O =
N
}
N
}
N
}
O
Z
N
}
N
}
O
Z
N
}
N
}
N
}
O
Z
N
}
N
}
O
Z
O
Z
N
}
N
}
'N
}
°
V
a
m
3
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
E
-o
-o
E
o
0
0
0
o
m o
m o
3
m
v3
O
O
O
O
vi
v
O -o
O
c
c
a
z
CL CL
F� E;
:-° -o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m w i
a
a
a
a
a
a
p
a
a
a
a
m
m
a
a
IN
O
O
a
a
a
O
a
a
a
O
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
c
0
U
D
O
N
O
"O
"�y
m
O
O
�Il
O
tp
O
O
�Il
O
tp
O
I�
O
o�
O
m
C
ti
O
ti
m
O
C
N =
ci
ci
O
o
O
ry
N
N
N
N
ci
ci
ci
ci
ci
.ti
ci
ci
ci
ci
:

O
o�
N
�n
N
m
N
oo
�o
N
to
to
O
Ln
O
N
m
N
oq
O
Ln
O
O
m
O
r"
O
Lq
O
O
O
N
C E
o
'W
i
`m c
u
m
'W
0 E
m
oo
O
m
C
m
O
m
oo
C
C
O N
i
oco
H
E
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
w W
Ti
D.
E
O
C c
i
m
C W in
N
a-I
Vf
N
M
C
n
m
O
m
a-I
O
N
O
M
a
m E [O^
E N
ti
O
ti
O
ti
O
N
O
n
O
v
O
O
O
Gt
O
O
O
.ti
O
O
O
N
O
N
O
ti
O
O
O
v
O
y m
� s
_ w
I
c a
m
m
m
io
�
in
O
N
O
O
O
O
N
v
•g
y, v
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
to
m
°
o
a -
O
r
w
�
-o
�
0
m
umi
O
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
p
u
u
ca
Vf
O C
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
C
v
a
D
=
C
v
a
O
>
C
v
a
v o
o`
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
O
c p�
O
V
" L
V
o
O
y Z
O
^
N N
w
w m
N
m oo
N
oo oo
N
3 :Vi
+'
m `O..
m �Il
t0 O
C ci
oo wi
oo N^
^
ci
m ci
t oo
ip w
O N
C w
ip C
m O,
m C
m
m ci
N
co oo
m
u1 t
N N
co m
m tp
m oo
N tp
u1
m oo
^ tp
ql
m
m
'o ,
ba
�I1
�o
p N
�o
�y O�
�n
N I�
�n
^
a
m w
m^
p tp
m^
�y
m
N N
w ,�
m w
w o
m tp
w o
m m
� o
ip ci
m
�y o�
m
p m
o
^ m
rn
I
m I
m `�
m `�
m `�
m `�
m `�
m `�
m `�
m `�
m `�
m `�
rn
rn
rn
oo
m
O V
x E v
y v c
o'
V
°-' , 1
M
L
t
cr
O
m
`o
`o
o
`o
`o
3 'v
c-
.N
a
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
o o
.B o:
Q
m Z .,
09
°
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
C O
O W
Q
'O
'6
.,
.,
a
�,
a
0 N
a
N
N
LL
LL
>
LL
LL
-O
LL -O
E
9 — t0 -o
LL
LL
-o
°
3
''
°
3
v°
LL
3
°
o
E \o
o
v
o
E 3
v
3
o E 3
v
m F v E 3
v
N
O
O
o 3
3
°
v
c
v
c
3
O -o
°
-o
O O -0
3
°
3 O O -o
io
v
c
c
m
o o m
3
'v
a
a
o=
'v
v
=
o f0
=
O
L° z 3 o f0
a
EL
m
>
m
>
m
>
m
EL
F� E-
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
-o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
c w' m
m a.
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
O
O
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
O
LL
15 IN
t
t
O
m=
c
o'
0
m
o
o
o
O
ci
N
m
C
O
n
oo
oo
m
n
O
c
m=
d
N
N
N
N
ci
N
N
N
ci
ci
ci
ci
N
N
N
ci
:

v
v �
o
ODD
Ul
� O
v -p
v
`v
a
p o
m v
W �
Ul -p
� 3
a
m 3
o v
v
`v
0
� o
n v
m v
0
W � T
c
O
3
O
V
0
o 3
v 3 w
v
Y o `
3
v 3
n
O o v
O
o E
r
o
0 C N
3 c o
O E w c �
p 3 o
o O
0 0 m
w w v " -
Q w o `o
E `o Q>o:ua Y
p LL p E o m m
v c v o w I
o '-
w w -
n O m vp Q
w m > v
0
Z II E > w Y
m o
v
O a O p 2
� p m
u p U
w Z w O
E v t O V
3 u o m o p
w w v
w
o
3 � o w v lm
D o v °D v fl-
\ " v 3 E
Q w O p v m r r
.Y O =
v p 0 o
v 0 m �
O 11 v p_ m 3
V E
a E
.�� O Y c n3
m m Q m
c v m o
a v E c
E m° o a ti v
Z `v a w o° 3 3
o w c m a$
v c w >
O' '4t 3 E 0 w N c
? U Y V V Ul
v— z3a
m z v w w v
v V c C
a
v w o v v w v p
c o m a a w 3-
0
H E.m'
U
t0
ti
t0
ti
oo
L
O
lfl
ti
N
N
O
N
N
lfl
N
m
m
ti
O
,-I
O
lfl
O
O
�O
�n
O
o
m
'W
w
i
u
�0
w .o
O
oo
o�
oo
o�
m
m
c-I
N
N
N
I�
m
N
o
O
O
o
t0
O
O
41
Lm
O
O
O
m
O
,-I
p�
�y
O
O
Lm
N
w W
Ti
D.
E
o
� c
w
c w
.n
.n
ni
a
o
0o
w
0o
�n
a
o
o
a
m E m
E"—
m
0
m
0
N
o
m
n
o
o
o
0
n
o
o
r
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
N'
y ,m
♦,
C a
u m 4
o
o
N
o
ci
m
O
o
m
o
m
o
oo
ci
O
N
O
O
u
w
c . E
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
xl
Q
w `w
F- a
a
to :
m
a
O
6 L
w W
-o
N N
O
J c
O
o
V
c
V
c
V
c
V
c
V
c
V
c
V
c
V
c
V
c
V
c
u
c
w
-o
ri ti
ca
•�
c
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
o
m m
a s
Ln
w o
a`
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
a
O
>
a
E E
c
o
V
N L
'.0
c c
N N
� O
UY d
Z
c w
a ti
o�
ry
m N
N
t
o�
ti a
m
ti
m ti
w
o
oo N
C
ti m
O^
o
oo o
O^
N
, oo
O m
,� oo
ci m
m o
t0 m
o
N m^
w
t m
w N
w
O m
w m
O m
w m
C
O
N
...
Oq.
m
oo oo
a
o
N m
m m
m N
N
w 0
m 0
w^
•_
+• :3
0 O
'= J.
J
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
:.. oo
oo
oo
C '6
O V
2 E w
O
p C
wv s
� D
°-' ' w
o
dl
cr
w
_
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
O
o
0
o
z
c
- c
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
u
m
u
vO 0
B O
Q
w Z"
yos
Q
V
6
o
m
+
p
m
-
o
o:
o
o
0
o
v 3
o
o
o
o
o
o
v
v
o
o
w
w
u
o
E 3
o
E 3
o
E 3'
f 6
0
o
o
E 3
o
E 3
o
E 3
3
3
o
E 3
ni
o -o
o -o
o -o
> LL
3
0 -o
o -o
o
o—
EL
m
m ==
m
m=
m
m=
K a
m
m
m=
m
m=
m
m=
w
w
o
>
3
=
z
F> E -
-o o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
c w w
O
c
of
p
io
N
m
`�
I�
oo
O
"ry
"�y
m
�I1
v
v �
o
ODD
Ul
� O
v -p
v
`v
a
p o
m v
W �
Ul -p
� 3
a
m 3
o v
v
`v
0
� o
n v
m v
0
W � T
c
O
3
O
V
0
o 3
v 3 w
v
Y o `
3
v 3
n
O o v
O
o E
r
o
0 C N
3 c o
O E w c �
p 3 o
o O
0 0 m
w w v " -
Q w o `o
E `o Q>o:ua Y
p LL p E o m m
v c v o w I
o '-
w w -
n O m vp Q
w m > v
0
Z II E > w Y
m o
v
O a O p 2
� p m
u p U
w Z w O
E v t O V
3 u o m o p
w w v
w
o
3 � o w v lm
D o v °D v fl-
\ " v 3 E
Q w O p v m r r
.Y O =
v p 0 o
v 0 m �
O 11 v p_ m 3
V E
a E
.�� O Y c n3
m m Q m
c v m o
a v E c
E m° o a ti v
Z `v a w o° 3 3
o w c m a$
v c w >
O' '4t 3 E 0 w N c
? U Y V V Ul
v— z3a
m z v w w v
v V c C
a
v w o v v w v p
c o m a a w 3-

Attachment D
Steam and Wetland Data Forms

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Piedmont Natural Gas 2. Evaluator's name: R. Weissman, PWS
3. Date of evaluation: 10/30/12 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: S214 - UNT to Nahunta Swamp 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.2 sq. mi. 8. Stream order: 2nd order
9. Length of reach evaluated: 340 linear feet 10. County: Greene County
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.4787568292936
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex.- 77.556611): -77.80849040119
Method location determined: ❑GPS ❑Topo Sheet ❑Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS ❑Other GIS ❑Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Approximately 220 feet west of intersection of pipeline ROW and Cow Town Dr.; see Environmental Resources Maps
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_
15. Recent weather conditions: Clear
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 1 foot of flowing water at time of inspection
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: []Section 10 []Tidal Waters []Essential Fisheries Habitat
[]Trout Waters []Outstanding Resource Waters [] Nutrient Sensitive Waters []Water Supply Watershed LI(I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? (!&& NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1.0 acre
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? kYEC NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 3 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial 72 % Agricultural
11 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 6 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: []Flat (0 to 2 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight []Occasional bends
2 % Cleared / Logged 111 % Other ( wetland /water )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 ft
[]Gentle (2 to 4 %) []Moderate (4 to 10 %) []Steep ( >10 %)
[]Frequent meander []Very sinuous []Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse)' 57 Comments: Channel appears as intermittent on the USGS topographic map, but appeared
to be perennial during site inspections. Flowing water at the time of inspection. Channel is bordered on west side by wetlands, and on east side by strip of forested uplands.
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
1
3
57

S214, Perennial, Facing north

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Line 5B Loop
City /County: Johnston County
Sampling Date: 10/23/12
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: W200
Investigator(s): R. Weissman, PWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35'20'11"N Long: 78 °14'22 "W Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: UcC - Uchee loamy coarse sand, 6 -12% slope NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Fil No F1 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil—E-1 or Hydrology _K significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No ❑
Are Vegetation E, Soil E, or Hydrology El naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑� No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Swale -like linear wetland with standing water but no defined bed and bank. Water not flowing at time of inspection. W200 and W201
are separated by the existing pipeline ROW /access road.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑�
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑�
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑�
Drift Deposits (133)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
a
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _[K]
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes g No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
W200
f
an
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
2 Pinus taeda
3 Magnolia virginiana
q Liquidambar styraciflua
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sampling Point: W200
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
= Total Cover
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
38.0
Y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5
(A)
38.0
Y
FAC
10.5
N FACU
20.5
N
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
7
4.
Range Midpoint
1 -5% 3.0
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
10.5
N
FAC
26 -50% 38.0
51 -75% 63.0
7.
76 -95% 85.5
Percent of Dominant Species
96- 100% 98.0
8.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71%
(A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
107
= Total Cover
FACW species
50% of total cover: 53.5
20%
of total cover: 21.4
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
x 4 =
UPL species
1
Ilex opaca
63.0
Y FAC
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
10.5
N FACU
3.
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Percent cover of vegetation was estimated based on midpoint values for cover ranges as follows:
4.
Range Midpoint
1 -5% 3.0
5.
6 -15% 10.5
16 -25% 20.5
6.
26 -50% 38.0
51 -75% 63.0
7.
76 -95% 85.5
96- 100% 98.0
8.
73.5
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 36.75
20%
of total cover: 14.7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1
Woodwardia virginica
10.5
Y OBL
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
10.5
Y FACU
3
Smilax spp.
(10.5)
q
Osmunda cinnamomea
10.5
Y FACW
5
Grasses spp.
(10.5)
6
Microstegium vimineum
20.5
Y FAC
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
n 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
52 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 26 20% of total cover: 10.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 None
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes Fil No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Percent cover of vegetation was estimated based on midpoint values for cover ranges as follows:
Range Midpoint
1 -5% 3.0
6 -15% 10.5
16 -25% 20.5
26 -50% 38.0
51 -75% 63.0
76 -95% 85.5
96- 100% 98.0
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W200
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -24 "+ 10yr2/1 Muck Organics. Roots throughout
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRS, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
T_E1
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Tu�I
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Tu�I
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material
(F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑ (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
�u-I
L_I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes g No g
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Line 5B Loop City /County: Johnston County Sampling Date: 10/23/12
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: Nc Sampling Point: W201
Investigator(s): R. Weissman, PWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale -like depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35 °20'13 "N Long: 78'14'21"W Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: UcC - Uchee loamy coarse sand, 6 -12% slope NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Fil No F1 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil—E-1 or Hydrology _a significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 101 No ❑
Are Vegetation E, Soil E, or Hydrology El naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑� No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Linear swale -like wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑�
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑�
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _[K]
No Depth (inches): 3"
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Surface
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes g No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W201
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
20.5 Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Liriodendron tuplipifera
63.0 Y FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (p/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
83.5 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 41.75
20% of total cover: 16.7
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Ilex opaca
20.5 Y FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2 Acer rubrum
20.5 Y FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.❑
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
41 = Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20.5
20% of total cover: 8.2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Woodwardia virginica
10.5 Y OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Microstegium vimeneum
10.5 Y FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Lycopus virginicus
3.0 N OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
24 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12
20% of total cover: 4.8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 None
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes Fil No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Percent cover of vegetation was estimated based on midpoint
values for cover ranges as follows:
Range Midpoint
1 -5% 3.0
6 -15% 10.5
16 -25% 20.5
26 -50% 38.0
51 -75% 63.0
76 -95% 85.5
96- 100% 98.0
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W201
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -16" Muck Organic
16 -20 "+ 10yr3/2
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRS, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
band
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (Sg) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
T_E1
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Tu�I
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Tu�I
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material
(F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑ (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
�u-I
L_I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes g No g
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Line 5B Loop City /County: Johnston County Sampling Date: 10/23/12
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: U200/201
Investigator(s): R. Weissman, PWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): 6 -12
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35 °20'13 "N Long: 78 °14'21 "W Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: UcC - Uchee loamy coarse sand, 6 -12% slope NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ro—I No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil—E-1 or Hydrology _a significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 101 No ❑
Are Vegetation E, Soil E, or Hydrology El naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑� No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present. Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q.
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes El No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Yes—E-1 No —F!-L Depth (inches):
Yes—E-1 No Depth
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No ❑�
—F!-L (inches):
_a
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream
gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
50% of total cover: 41.75
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
1 Sparse ( <5% cover)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
83.5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16.7
Sampling Point: U200/201
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (p/B)
Total % Cover of:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
63.0
Y
FAC
2 Fraxinus americana
10.5
N
FACU
3 Pinus taeda
20.5
Y
FAC
4.
3.
5.
4.
6.
5.
7.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
8.
Vegetation
Present? Yes Fil No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
94
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 47
20% of
total cover:
18.8
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
Percent cover of vegetation was estimated based on midpoint values for
cover ranges as follows:
1 Ilex opaca
63.0
Y
FAC
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
20.5
Y
FAC
3.
16-25% 20.5
4.
51 -75% 63.0
5.
76-95% 85.5
6.
96-100% 98.0
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 41.75
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
1 Sparse ( <5% cover)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
83.5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16.7
Sampling Point: U200/201
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (p/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species 167
x 3 = 501
FACU species 10.5
x 4 = 42
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: 177.5
(A) 543 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.1
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
n 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 None
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes Fil No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
All dominant plants are "FAC ". Prevalence index is >3.0.
Percent cover of vegetation was estimated based on midpoint values for
cover ranges as follows:
Range Midpoint
1 -5% 3.0
6-15% 10.5
16-25% 20.5
26-50% 38.0
51 -75% 63.0
76-95% 85.5
96-100% 98.0
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: U200/201
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -12 10yr2/1 Sand
12 -18 "+ 10yr3/2
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRS, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
band
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
T_E1
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Tu�I
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Tu�I
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material
(F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑ (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
�u-I
L_I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes g No g
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Line 5B Loop
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas
Investigator(s): R. Weissman, PWS
City /County: Greene Co.
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC
Sampling Date: 10/30/12
Sampling Point: W222
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35 °28'43 "N Long: 77'48'32 "W Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: CoC2 - Cowarts sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded NWI classification: PEM /PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Fil No F1 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation K, Soil—E-1 or Hydrology _a significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No
Are Vegetation L, Soil E-1 or Hydrology E-1 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑� No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland is crossed by existing maintained pipeline corridor; PEM in ROW and PSS outside. Plot taken in maintained ROW
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑�
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q.
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
0.
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _[K]
No Depth (inches): In pockets
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Surface
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes g No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1 Microstegium vimineum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Sampling Point: W222
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (p/B)
20% of total cover:
(3.0) No FAC
`5% = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
85.5 Yes FAC
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1 Rubus spp. (38.0)
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes Fil No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Midpoint ranges used to estimate % cover as follows:
Range Midpoint
1 -5% 3.0
6 -15% 10.5
16 -25% 20.5
26 -50% 38.0
51 -75% 63.0
76 -95% 85.5
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W222
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc
0 -9" 10yr4/2
9 -12 "+ 10yr4/2 95 10yr3/1 5 D M
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRS, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Texture Remarks
Mucky silt loam
Coarse sand Streaking And some depletions
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
T_E1
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Tu�I
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Tu�I
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material
(F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑ (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
�u-I
L_I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes g No g
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Line 513 Loop City /County: Greene Co. Sampling Date: 4/12/13
Applicant /Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: W301DP1
Investigator(s): S Ryan Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope ( %): 3 -5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long: Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: PEM /PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Fol No R (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _K, Soil _a, or Hydrology _a significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _a No
Are Vegetation F1 , Soil F1 , or Hydrology F1 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
H dric Soil Present? Yes No
y within a Wetland? Yes i No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Small narrow linear wetland. Wetland is crossed by existing maintained pipeline corridor; PEM in ROW and PSS outside. Plot taken
in maintained ROW.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
LJ
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑�
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
•
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
•
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
L1
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _K
No —EI— Depth (inches): within ROW
Water Table Present? Yes J�L
Fil
No E_ Depth (inches): Surface
El Surface
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
7.1rQ
so 1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W301 -DP1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
None
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 86% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
Ilex opaca Aiton
10
No
FACU
UPL species x 5 =
3
Ligustrum siense
30
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
60
= Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 30
20% of
total cover:
12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
65
Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Woodwardia areolata
35
Yes
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3
Athyrium filix - femina
25
No
FAC
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
Peltandra virginica
10
No
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
135
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 67.5
20% of
total cover:
27
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1
Mikania scandens
35
Yes
FACW
2
Smilax Bona -nox
60
Yes
FACW
3
Vitis.Spp.
45
Yes
FACW - Upl
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
140
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes OR No
50% of total cover: 70
20% of
total cover:
28
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W301 -DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -9" 10yr4/2 Mucky silt loam
9 -12 "+ 10yr4/2
95 10yr3/1 5
D M
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
.❑ Histosol (Al)
.❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
.❑ Black Histic (A3)
.❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
.❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
.❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
.❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
.❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
.❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
.❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
.❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
.❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
.❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
.Q Stripped Matrix (S6)
.❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Coarse sand Streaking And some depletions
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, 13)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes —E— No
W301 Looking South from Existing Easement
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Line 513 Loop City /County: Greene Co. Sampling Date: 4/12/13
Applicant /Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: W301DP2
Investigator(s): S Ryan Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope ( %): 3 -5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: Long: Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: PEM /PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Fol No R (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _K, Soil _a, or Hydrology _a significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _a No
Are Vegetation F1 , Soil F1 , or Hydrology F1 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
H dric Soil Present? Yes No
y within a Wetland? Yes No Fil
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I I No t
Remarks:
Upland Plot
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
•
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
•
Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Yes No Depth (inches):
Yes El No Fil Depth
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
(inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream
gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
so 1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W301 DP2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
45 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2 Quercus alba
30 Yes FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3 Pinus Tiea
35 Yes FAC
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
110 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
55 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2 Ilex opaca Aiton
30 Yes FACU
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
85 = Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1 Vitis.Spp.
25 Yes FACW - Upl
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
25 = Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5
Present? Yes Fil No R
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W301 -DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -12+ 10YR 6/3 100 N/A 0 Course Sand
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
.❑ Histosol (Al)
.❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
.❑ Black Histic (A3)
.❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
.❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
.❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
.❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
.❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
.❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
.❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
.❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
.❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
.❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
.❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
.❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
.❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
.❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, 13)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _a No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0