20170269 Ver 1_Jurisdictional Determination_20120907

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 S. NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27610
919- 212 -1760 • FAX [phone]
www.environmentalservicesinc.com
4 September 2012
Mr. David Wainwright
NCDENR, NCDWQ
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
RE: TIP R -5516 Improvements
Craven County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Wainwright:
.�
i� 2� UP11
12
T�4q�n
RBA
Enclosed, please find one (1) copy of the appropriate stream data forms, along with the
jurisdictional features figures for the original R -5516 project. As per our conversation,
our field review visit has been scheduled for September 10, 2012 at 12:30 meeting at the
Food Lion parking lot near the southern terminus of the project. Should you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact me at 919 - 801 -1886.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Gail Tyner
Senior Scientist
Enclosure
FLORIDA • GEORGIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • OHIO

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE73 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Srvi L
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:' / e- 551 CP 2. Evaluator's name: >�SI ' M kS
3. Date of evaluation: -7I 1S-/ I Z 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: ^LA 6. River basin- Ac v-rt
7. Approximate drainage area:-) a D &C 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 5-09. '�� 10. County:. C m%l c -,
11. Site coordinates (if known)! prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any)- tf A
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Z+ I• 1 I g I Z Longitude (ex. - 77.556611):'" 7. 1 Y z g 03
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet rtho Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks- and attach map identifying streams) location):
us !Jo
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_
15. Recent weather conditions: Je c t c ft--L'
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ' (<Q�� l j 1y-, l w/ f�l�� i , CA-1) SS t �V
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters' _Essential 14sheries Habitat
_Trout' Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (ax yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential 10 % Commercial Zb % Industrial _% Agricultural
60% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank)- Z-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 1/6)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic, must •be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should.reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score,of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ,5-0 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date % %Z5 1 11-
This channel evaluatio form is intended tc be u my as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.
.sa, !� IACI

USACE AID#
DWQk
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET rMG
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: tj C'D O % 9-55/(/v 2. Evaluator's name: �ST ' M 4Cs
3. Date of evaluation: % 12 C1 11 4. Time of evaluation: 1 P.9 0 A
5. Name of stream: UT lb 5awtt 6. River basin: Ne J-r C-
7. Approximate drainage area: 5A, L S. Stream order: '-
9. Length of reach evaluated: C O 0 - 10, County
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 Y G • 1 Z y 8. 10 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): " % 6 • / 3'6
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (.Aerial) Photo /GIS�Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach yrlder evaluation (note nearby roads an landmarks an — attach map identifying stream(s) location):
A.1. —
14. Proposed channel work (if
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
_Tidal Waters
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES o If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES tSO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ® NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential -L-C' % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
7 S %Forested —% Cleared /Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: 3 �'� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (>I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a. brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a scone of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ` Comments:
Evaluator's Signature_ Z � Ari, Date 71.2
This channel evaluation form is intended to he used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

USACE AID#
SIm 3
DWQ # -- — Site # _ (indicate on attached map) s00-jo
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream ,'reach under assessment:
cD OT . R - S- S� 6 CST _ ni ks
1. Applicant's name: - %U 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: 7 I2 6' 1 Z 4. Time of evaluation: W 3 y
5. Name of stream: y i fJ, 6. River basin: Nr ✓vL
7. Approximate drainage area: HOC Ac, 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100-4 10. County: C rGyG ti
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): IV A
Latitude (ex 34 872312): 3 Y• 9 z 41 Longitude (ex. —77 556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet ho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmar cs and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
E c� Ul 7 0
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: —R C c-e—J- k'
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ^ J a.. t 6+
- sib I e
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel, appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: (O % Residential .30-% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
30 % Forested — %o Cleared / Logged —30% Other ( t!ytr-4u if JRrJ -%•r )
22. Bankfull width: 3 —p- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) X Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Y Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for. the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a' brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should 'reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with'a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:.
Evaluator's Signature !i' J/ Date -7/1
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.
S N&b ,

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
4 -cL,-
Sw(A
s ►^ti-D
1. Applicant's name: NGD 10T - S5l CP 2. Evaluator's name: Fs.l ' Mks
3. Date of evaluation: Y1 7 112 - 4. Time of evaluation: 1 C p O f9 M
5. Name of stream: ric,_ k v C 6. River basin: IV a y t
7. Approximate drainage area: ,�(R CA-C i" 8. Stream order: Z
9. Length of reach evaluated: Z-�� 10. County. Craw-
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N f�
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 4 • `� 15 Y S'-? Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): _7 7 7 / C
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet QOrtho (Aerial) Photo /GIS�Cher GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an an cs iW attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): , .
15. Recent weather conditions: 2 e %4.0t'
16. Site conditions at time
17. Identify any special waterway
/�a+w
M
known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters = Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES CNdDlf yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? C&_V C&_ NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: I S % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
jr-1. Forested _% Cleared / Logged / V % Other ( Xr% r� o J-r )
22. Bankfull width: ZS 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): cf
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight %Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): y ! Comments:
Evaluator's Signature /l -���T_ Date- TJ7 Z
This channel evaluation form is intedded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change – version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.
smJ

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessments
1. Applicant's name: - 551 2. Evaluator's name: a'l � 6T
3. Date of evaluation: 2' 4. Time of evaluation: Q-.--
5. Name of stream: U 6. River basin: u
7. Approximate drainage area: 1,j -k , S. Stream order: _Nt
9. Length ofreach evaluated: /5-0 ' 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): O,prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex 34.872312): �� !('/J
T Longitude (ex — 77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet o Aerial /GIS ' Other GIS Other
13. Lotion of reach #er evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (MV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES INO,JIf yes, estimate the water surface
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? Q YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? W NO
"
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
-1<0% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 3 f 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): (o - /
24. Channel slope down center of stream: '� Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) - I ✓Moderate (4 t0 10 %) _Steep ( >10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight vOccasional bends Brequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (11rom reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form tended to be #1W only as a guide to assist landowners and envlr#6meiitsJ professionals in
gathering the data required by the United S tes Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.
Sc

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SF (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the'following information for the stream reach under assessment: _
1. Applicant's name: �C �" 2. Evaluator's name: �--'S l — 6T-
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation: c� �•-,n
5. Name of stream: tff `Tvr f C11 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area:_a -e- S. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: I t C + 10. County: C/(0f! Qom'..
11. Site coordinates (if kapm)): prefer in decimal degrees. .12. Subdivision name (if any): /N q
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex. — 77.556611): r � �1 • � y %l
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Aerial) Pho GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads an and attach map identifying streams) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if
16. Site conditions at time of visit: vv- ULJ\ &A JA­54\,r-b.eA AkA t t V-Oa.„, V k'J >u tkfi u14
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Msential Fisheries Habitat
_Troup Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -M
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (RD If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES (0) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES Q
21. Estimated watershed land use: 11esidential 1S % Commercial _ _% Industrial _% Agricultural
?5% Forested _% Cleared / Logged a % Other ( BcNro P
22. Bankfull width: I =- Z fi 23. 1- Bank height (from bed to top of bank): if
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) /Gentle (2 to 4 0%) Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 0/.)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signatu l Date -6 1 -1 . 10-
This channel evaluation o is intended to u o s a guide to assist landowners acid a viro mental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Arm ores of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.
13r

DOT Precip Results at 34.918121, - 76.94280
Multi - Sensor Preclpltation Estimates
eft WON 0
�a
MPE home Map My Projects My Alerts More MPE Data User Acct Status NC CRONOS
Get More MPE Data for
Date Range: 2012 -07 -15 thru 2012 -08 -15
Latitude: 34.918121 Longitude: - 76.94280
Observation
Date & Time (EST)
2012 -07 -15 07 00:00
2012 -07 -16 07:00:00
2012 -07 -17 07.00.00
2012 -07 -18 07:00:00
2012 -07 -19 07 00 00
2012 -07 -20 07:00 00
2012 -07 -21 07:00:00
2012 -07 -22 07:00:00
2012 -07 -23 07.00 00
2012 -07 -24 07:0000
2012 -07 -25 07:00:00
2012 -07 -26 07 00 00
2012 -07 -27 07.00:00
2012 -07 -28 07:00:00
2012 -07 -29 07:00 00
2012 -07 -30 07 0000
2012 -07 -31 07:00:00
2012 -08 -01 07.00:00
2012 -08 -02 07.00:00
2012 -08 -03 07:00 00
2012 -08 -04 07:00.00
2012 -08 -05 07.00:00
2012 -08 -06 07:00.00
2012 -08 -07 07 00 00
2012 -08 -08 07.00:00
2012 -08 -09 07 00:00
2012 -08 -10 07.00 00
2012 -08 -11 07.0000
2012 -08 -12 0700:00
2012 -08 -13 07.00:00
2012 -08 -14 07 00 00
2012 -08 -15 07:00:00
TOTAL:
Precipitation (inches)
0 012
0
0.118
0
0
0
0.39
0.228
0.516
0.335
0.39
0
0
0 012
0.89
0 138
0 358
0 102
0.177
0
0.059
0
0
0.161
0 469
0.079
0.102
0.799
0.673
0.13
0
0.012
615
Page 1 of 2
State Climate Office Contact

DOT Precip Results at 34.918121, -76.94280
Mulfi-Sensor Pred
IVIF
4jF
MPE home Map My Projects My Alerts More MPE Data
Get More MPE Data for
Date Range: 2012-09-01 thru 2012-09-10
Latitude: 34.918121 Longitude: -76.94280
Observation
Date & Time (EST)
2012-09-01 07-00 00
2012-09-02 07:00.00
2012-09-03 07 00 00
2012-09-04 07 00 00
2012-09-05 07:00-00
2012-09-06 07:00 00
2012-09-07 07:00:00
2012-09-08 07.00-00
2012-09-09 07 00:00
TOTAL:
' OF
Precipitation (inches)
0
0
2551
002
0.02
0
1 768
0.445
0102
4906
AtatIon Estimates
ri
User Acct Status NC CRONOS State Climate Office
Page I of I
Contact

A
Q)
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 I
Date:
Project/Site: - ��%
Latitude: '? (,
Evaluator: r
County:
Longitude:- 46/4
Total Points: /
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if 2 19 or perennial if z 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name 4(,i ? ��
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18• Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 )
2
3
/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Depositional bars or benches
[7.Active
Co
1
2
3
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
.3
8. Headcuts
0 %
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated; see di is sss in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 )
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3'
C. Biologv (Subtotal = )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: c�1t
TrI
ND

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ;I- Tprojectisite: Latitude: II tt p t
Evaluator: County:
Total Points: --
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Determination (circle one) Other
if 19 or rennial if 30' > Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
1` Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active /relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated; see dis u sions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strc
0
1
2
1
0
3
2
3
01
0.5
2
3
0;
1
2
3
(0 )
0
2
3
0
1
2
3
1.
1
2
3
0�
1 T
2
3
o.
0.5
1
1.5
0
0.
1
1.5
No' 0
Yes = 3
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
C 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
co
15. Sediment on plants or debris
22. Fish
0.5
1
1)
1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0,Y
=3/
25. Algae
G. 1:31010gv (Subtotal= I /') )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 1_�
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 , 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1 2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
P-k 1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0..,._
0.5 . 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
61 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =,` 1.5 , Other = 0
I -perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Sketch:
/r
T(..,

11
NC DWQ S eam L4entification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2 C W ,` Project/Site: - I co Latitude: o
Evaluator: CTS ( _ County:C w-, Longitude:
Total Points: Strea etermination (circle one) Other ��� `oC,�
Stream is at least intermittent V l
if a 19 or rennial if 2 30' In termittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
F Absent Weak
Mod
to Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1 1
C2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le-pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0 )
1 1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0OU
I 1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 0J 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1 1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5 1
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5 1
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discuss' o manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = .
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
U1.)
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 1
jE5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris fines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high wa
er table?
No = 0
Yes,L T-,
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1 2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1 2
1
p
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
fQJ
1 0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL t 1.5 - her = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
NAtes:
Sketch:
1
•.�.._.._._..� I i 7�f� Fig

NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
T / r f . \ Project/Site: � Latitude:
Evaluator: ( -"� County: V r a V" Longitude:
Total Points: ^ Stream Deter 'nation (circle one) Other u
Stream is at least intermittent G Ephemera ntermitten erennial e.g. Quad Name
if a 19 or perennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
I).!) )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
`2_v,/
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
_ 2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1'
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
(1 �+
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0'
Yes = 3
t).5)
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussiggas in manual
R- Hvdroloav (Subtotal= q .5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
�2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
10.`
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
77F,.5
1+
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
10.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
(0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ye v=
s = 3
C_ Bioloav (Subtotal= _h
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3- .
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20..Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 ` '
�..¢ �(1.
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 ,;�
1
2
3
22. Fish ,
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
o.61.)
1.5
25. Algae
0
t).5)
y _
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 'O L =. =1�5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
L,7
Sketch: �til�t ✓�
a
,4 C11,i
b( (j_
k 0 3^' , /tL{ tip w` G.. F's43�tG rl,.�%�•G� .

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S�
Date: S/ Project/Site: - 5 �' Latitude: 3 s
Evaluator: County: Longitude:_ -7 35i�
Total Points: Stream Determination (circigii Other l
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermittent ren e.g. Quad Name " 6-6 IL
if t 19 or perennial if a 30' v
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = •))
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 3'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2 3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
0.5
2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2 3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2 3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1
11. Second or greater order channel
No JO
Yes = 3
"artiticial ancnes are not rateo; see ois ions in manuai -
R_ Hvdrnlnav (Subtotal = I 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
0.5
3
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of higJ watevtable?
No = 0
Yese
3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
94
1
1.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0
1
24. Amphibians
0
0 J6
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: LA it_
5 �h
Sketch: SIB
SIG+ -7 n 30
Cbai

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
awC
Date: 8171 I-L
ProjectfSite: js `c
Latitude:
Evaluator: Esi,- Mk j
County: C
Longitude: -74 5 y774C
Total Points:
Steam is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (cil# one)
Ephemeral Intermittent
,
Other? `�+�.� !�a%
JT"r
if 2 19 or perennial if a 30-
erennr
e.g. Qued Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = Z'�• �)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
©
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
CD
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
%"
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = Icy )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
U
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
CD
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
C D_
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes U3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _X C-1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
CLD
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
7e_ � -ree
Sketch:
l�
-
�
CaK _� : f 1 ►5 � _Hy -,,A:1
SKD

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SAe
s
Date: Z 6 f
Project/Site: R- 5-571 6
Latitude: 3 `l , 9 7 IV S S
Evaluator:
County: C r
Longitude: - 7 6. 5 y S SL`J
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent t Ci "I S
Stream Deter (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
Other �f� f
e.g. Quad Name: r c- Lf Cci,
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
CD
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
cip
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
Op
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
C2
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
COD
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
QD
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 '
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
U3
C. Biology Subtotal = 2 . I i
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
Q6D
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW 05 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
i
w Tc-
N.4
/Je tj'ar C4.,./ .� -1;"'
O�- CV�1 1J r~
5 rn,13

vS�S
NC D'*VQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 717,611-L
Project/Site: V-- SS 1
Latitude: 39. 9 Z MID
Evaluator: ES J7 - M le- r
County: C «G,...
Longitude:. %b. y 3%
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �Q s
Stream Determination (ci
Ephemeral Interinitten Perenn I
Other
Quad Name: .
if 2:19 or rennial if Z 30' '
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = `l •�)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
1.5
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
0.5
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
CD
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No-t-0)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = $•S
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
QD
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
W
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
20. Mac robenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 1
0
1 0.5
1
1.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? I
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology Subtotal = t'i •S
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
Q
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Mac robenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CD
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
1. Other= 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: �y
�tJi�r`'
f
6� 7
3
3
s.�., a ; r;
- ��r�;.1
u� \
5T&6 - �

etx
Alf-
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: - 7'25-1 i Z
ProjectMite: e - SS I U
Latitude: 31. It 1812 I -
Evaluator: rf T „ M k f
County: C ro.voc „
Longitude: -?6. 11 Z 03
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent V7.5
Stream Determination (circ e )
Ephemeral Intermittent
Other✓
if Z 19 or perennial if 2: 30' '
erennia
e.g. Quad Name.
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. rttfle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool se uence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
.5
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
QD
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 9
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
©
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
Qj
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3
C. Biology (Subtotal= 1 v )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
CD
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.
25. Algae
0
Qp
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =Cl-.i Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: 11F,
SAi SM

d
dr
��I
1� ,
00,
41►
4w

j
1449 X4
Nal,
mks, M
�.
OL
NVE
tm
E
`► l � :
M[= Project Study Area-
o 1.000 2000
Feet
seamless USGS quadrangles (Havelock (1983), NC);
Project Study Area provided by NCDOT
Disclaimer The information depicted on this figure is for PR
t I - :' 'A informational purposes only and was not prepared for,
review and is
intend �d for use only by a Professional Land Surveyor prior to
Thi informationpresented is not for regulatory
regulatory review.
Project Study -- � ♦�
,and is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes. Area Map - ••.�
US 70 to Slocum Road and Relocation of MacDonald Boulevard Date. Aug 2012!
Craven County, North Carolina Drwn/Chkd: KT/GT
T. I. . -
lik
i
t
Path: P:\GeoGra\ Projects \2010 \060 \71 \GIS \Fig. topo.mxd Date: 8117201211: 28 : 24 AM

N Ly GoA
So_
Ra GOA �' G
f' LY
N ton
MM tore
Cr8 La
La
Ba
SuD
GOA
GOA GOA
a _ �~ \ SUD
GOA G MM M
Ra 0—'� / r 5uD
GaA GOA , SUD
►n On ' �� S '.1 GOA
NOB GOA AuB 1 >.
On..
Ra Noe
On AuB
Le
Ei a LY
La Ra On Ra
LY l
On
La
Ra
\ y
1\ On Ly
N` I Aug
On Un ` No
ea _ �'oy GOA
LY
Pa La Le
On AuB
c�oa Cree
Ra a AuB /
Ra
Ly
NOB
Pa ;
t' � ^1r,Qt /
a Ra
GOA
06 u \. !� _ �1�
Q
On
NoB
Ra � t7�
Ra �,...i SuD /. No8 On AuB
To Le On M y $ No9 y
On Suo \ r
t9nU d
c On Su
NOB
C
CT Ra \ MM
x / Z On A
On 1 ,I
Pa N TIO LY
CROATAN CH3
ttu L O n
La 4�P •tLY n
ln+ vd ��'
Le P
� Ra
Pa On ` Cr8
FOREST 1 s LY
m Le
I Q On OB
C f Ka
T
LY
Le � Lv
La
rr NoA
La 1 ` (` GOA N
Ba .r y p
La Ric A �,�R E S
11� ` Rc ` y
Ra GuA Nub t
BB + Lc
La
J
ea Be \ NuB
La
La
Le
ea ...._� . La '_ Creek
Project Study Area" - Ba Le Ra suD
0 1 000 2.000 _ La h On GuA
,/ GuA
Feet %L
Sources. 2011 National Geographic Society/ESRI, i -cubed
seamless USGS quadrangles (Havelock (1983), NC); Ly
Project Study Area provided by NCDOT 68 Nu8
Disclaimer The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, On
and is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
This informationpresented is not for regulatory review and is _ 't
intended for use only by a Professional Land Surveyor prior to Le' L}T
regulatory review. La x �' NOB Nu8
Project Location Project: ER10060.11
k US 70 to Slocum Road and Relocation of MacDonald Boulevard Date: Aug 2012
3 Craven County, North Carolina Dtwn /Chkd: KTIGT
•`y�4rtN tFlt'` -tt T.I.P. R -5516 Figure: 1
Path: P: \GeoGra\ Projects \2010 \060 \11\GIS\scan.m %d Date: 6/16f2012 11 .25:13 AM