Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
310100_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210722
V Division of Water Resources Facility Number ©- l6 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: Cum 'ance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Accessl 1' /j Date of Visit: �(ry�ArrivalTime:� Departure Time: County:'J Itt) RegionaltlLQ Farm Name:y JS1i'n I t t UrOwner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine aantoI Wean to I Feederto Farrow to Farrow to Farrow to Other Phone: Title: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. 4AoLa er Non -La er Design Current Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify D WR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE [:]Yes n �o NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes I1f No NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facili Number: ( - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes K.Ate--J::] NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in):� St 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes C]&o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? J Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes )o ❑ NA ❑ NE Reauired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes g-< ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [ta- o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ev o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 511212020 Continued Facility Number: 00 Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes <o0❑ NA ❑ NE C 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes t<o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes []-N;r— ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No [DMA ❑ NE ❑ Yes t1J" 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �)No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes FF 4 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 1 ;No 0 ❑ Yes """ ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ONE comments (reter to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). L lj/(/05 '0rvf '{x/WJL" 7cn//a/3(/off/. Mew SU/I/C) %Nifl� 6�Q h� 440- �e_7 J �>G ac)a--a, Reviewer/Inspector Name: y /� l,C4- L (/d/) Phone: I a / OYI Y l7 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C f.,: Date: % /a dJQ"j Page 3 of 3 511212020