20130581 Ver 1_Application_20130529

-q
Y J
MAY 2 9 2013
DENR - 9lATER QUALITY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRP."1CH
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mr. Tom Steffens Mr. Stephen Lane Garcy Ward
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers N. C. Dept. of Env. And Natural Resources N. C. Dept. of Env. And Natural
Resources
Regulatory Field Office Division of Coastal Management Division of Water Quality
2407 W. 5th St. ' 400 Commerce Avenue 943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889 Morehead City, NC 28557 Washington, NC 27889
5/20/2013
Subject: CAMA Major permit application, PCN — 401 and NWP 3 application for Beaufort # 126.
Reference: NCDOT project number and WBS number 17BP.2.R.14 p 1 3 0 5
81
Dear Sirs,
We are resubmitting revised applications (CAMA Major, PCN -401 and NWP3) for a bridge to bridge replacement on
Beaufort bridge #126 over Jordan Creek on SR 1725 Pamlico Beach Rd. The conditions of the 35'x 25.3' existing
bridge require replacement. The new structure will be a 50' x 33' cored slab bridge.
Permit Site Impacts:
There will be no Buffer impacts due to Coastal wetlands on all quadrants pushing the buffers beyond the project area.
There are no 404 wetland impacts separate of the 1454 sq. ft. of coastal wetland impacts to accommodate the new
shoulder requirements for the new structure.
There are 1305 sq, ft. of open water impacts.
Avoidance and Minimization:
NCDOT has researched this site and a bridge to pipe would have significantly reduced coastal wetland impacts but was
not a viable option due to WRC recommendations and Jordan Creeks PNA designation. The new structure was
designed to meet or exceed the existing level of service for the site. Because CAMA requirements hold us to
maintaining the existing navigable clearance side slopes have been reduced to 2:1 to minimize coastal wetland impacts.
Compensatory Mitigation:
The 1454 sq. ft. of permanent coastal wetland impacts will require mitigation at 1:1 ratio by the NC Div. of Coastal
Management. These impacts will be debited from the Campbell Creek Phase 1 mitigation site. A debit ledger will be
included in the application.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jay Johnson at
(252) 916 -8227.
Sincerely,
i Johnson

ot S A
OaT 1 99
y r
O c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program. .
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
j ® Yes
❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
17BP.2.R.14 Beaufort 126
2b. County:
Beaufort
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Bath
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
17BP.2.R.14
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d. Street address:
105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.:
252 - 439 -2800
3g. Fax no.:
252 - 830 -3341
3h. Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
Page Iof10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name:
Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d. Street address:
P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.:
252 - 439 -2800
4g. Fax no.:
252 - 830 -3341
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Beaufort 126 Bridge to Bridge Replacement
Latitude: 35.463072 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
76.635772
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Jordan Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SA; HQW; NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar - Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1725, Pamlico Beach Road is a paved secondary highway. Coastal Marshes and Residences dominate the
landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.0334 acres of coastal wetlands onsite.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge to bridge replacement; the existing bridge has deteriorated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing 35' long timber bridge on timber pilings will be replaced with a proposed 50' long cored slab bridge.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: CAMA
Name (if known): Stephen Lane
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
CAMA flagged on 11/23/11
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Coastal
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0087
W2 ® P [:IT
Fill
Coastal
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0079
W3 ® P ❑ T
Fill
Coastal
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0022
W4 ® P ❑ T
Fill
Coastal
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.0146
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.0334
2h. Comments: 1454 Sq.Ft. of Coastal Wetland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and
tributary impacts
none
3i. Comments: none
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ®P ❑ T
Jordan Creek
Fill
Tidal
0.0230
02 ❑P FIT
0
03 ® P [--IT
Jordan Creek
Fill
Tidal
0.0070
04 ®P ❑ T
Jordan Creek
Fill
Tidal
0.0146
417. Total open water impacts
0.0446
4g. Comments: 1305 Sq.Ft. of Open Water Impacts
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
im act
required?
131 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
El Yes
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
F] Yes
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
None
6i. Comments: No Buffer Impacts
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are no stream impacts and no buffer impacts. There are 1305 sq.ft. of open water impacts and 1454 sq.ft. of coastal
wetland impacts due to the installation of a 50'x 33' cored slab bridge.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
® Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Campbell Creek Phase 1
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Coastal
Quantity 1454 Sq.Ft.
3c. Comments: Debit ledger is attached
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Mitigating 1454 Sq.Ft. of coastal wetlands 1:1 ratio from Campbell Creek Phase 1 Mitigation Bank.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian.Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ❑ No
Comments: See stormwater management plan
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A Bridge Project %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater will discharge into coastal wetlands before entering stream. Stormwater from roadway will diffuseflow through
coastal wetlands. There are no deck drains over open water or wetlands.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
® Other: NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWO Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Onsite field investigation by Jay Johnson "No Effect"
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC - See Attached Letter
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU Historic Architecture and Archaeology - See Attached Letter
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Designed to no -rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson
c2z,
May 21, 2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
ge Signature
(Agent's signature is v on if an thorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 11/7111
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
NCDOT
Jay Johnson- Division 2 DEO
Post Office Box 1587
Greenville, North Carolina 27835
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FIDE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington (Washington Field
office) NCDOT/NCSR 1725 (Pamlico Beach Rd) Bridge #126 replacement, Beaufort
County, NC.
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project is
located on SR 1725 (Pamlico Beach Rd) approximately . miles south of SR, adjacent to Jordan
Creek.
(IF NECESSARY, USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE
WATERBOIIDIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
1. State: NC County: Beaufort City: Bath
2. Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.463072 / Long. 76.635772
3. Name of nearest waterbody: Jordan Creek
4. Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
a. Non - wetland waters: linear feet: and/or .0446 acres.
i) Cowardin Class(es): Estuarine
ii) Stream Flow: N/A
b. Wetlands: .0334 acres.
i) Cowardin Class(es): Estuarine
7. Name of onsite water bodies identified as Section 10 waters:
® Tidal
❑ Non -Tidal

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination / Date:
® Field Determination / Date(s): 11/7/11

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States
on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person
who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD
in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general
permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to
comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in
reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water
bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United
States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and
(7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and
all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional
issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be " waters of the United States on the subject project
site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity,
based on the following information: Jordan Creek -Tidal stream
F. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply -
checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested,
appropriately reference sources below):

N Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
N Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
N U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: USGS 7.5 Ransomville
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodpla.in Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): Onsite 11/7/11
BIPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
S' a ate
requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)

Compensatory Mitigation
The Campbell Creek Mitigation Site was constructed in 2006 as compensatory mitigation
to offset unavoidable impacts associated with Tetterton Road (SR 1963). The project site
is located approximately seven miles east of Aurora in Beaufort County. The Phase I site
is adjacent to Campbell Creek and is approximately 29 acres in size. The site has
undergone four years of successful hydrologic and vegetative monitoring as of the 2009
monitoring year.
In order to offset unavoidable Coastal Wetland impacts associated with Bridge 126
(WBS# 17BP.2.R.14) in Beaufort County, the Campbell Creek Mitigation Site will be
debited 0.03 acres of Brackish Marsh Creation. This debit is reflected in the debit ledger
below.
�
Debit
Additional Notes
Brackish Marsh Preservation 18.11
Mitigation Type
Site TIP
Notes
i
Amount(Ac)
Brackish Marsh
0.094
DIV PROJ SR 1963
Creation
Brackish Marsh
0.049
B -2805
Creation
Brackish Marsh
0.01
B -3809
Creation
Brackish Marsh
0.24
B -3611 .12 @2:1
Creation
Marsh
0.034
Bridge 126 Beaufort County (WBS 17BP.2.R.14)
[Brackish
reation
(1454Sgft)
Mitigation Type
Starting Amount (Ac)
Additional Notes
Brackish Marsh Preservation 18.11
Do not debit until l
notified.
Mitigation Type Starting Amount (Ac) I Additional Notes
Freshwater Marsh Preservation 4.98 No Debits as of
5/21/2013
Mitigation Type f Starting Amount (Ac) I Additional Notes
Freshwater Marsh Creation 2.25 No Debits as of
5/21/2013

Response CAMA Jurisdictional Beaufort 126.txt
From: Lane, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:17 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: RE: Beaufort 126 SR 1725,Pamlico Beach Road over Jordan Creek
Hi Mike,
I visited Bridge #126 over Jordan Creek on SR1725 in Beaufort County with Jay on
November 23, 2011 and determined that the bridge is over the Public Trust waters of
Jordan Creek and adjacent to Coastal wetlands which were delineated at the time of
,the visit. The replacement project will require a CAMA permit, either a General
Permit or Major Permit, depending of the level of impacts associated with the
project. Please let me know if I may be of any further assistance with this
project.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 5:07 PM
To: Lane, Stephen
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: Beaufort 126 SR 1725,PamliCo Beach Road over Jordan Creek
Hey Mr. Stephen ... This one,Beaufort 126 is really close to Beaufort 124 and we would
like to get a CAMA Jurisdictional call on Beaufort 126 .... Thank You .... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Page 1

Response Moratorium Beaufort 126.txt
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:23 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: RE: Beaufort 126
Jordan Creek, is designated and inland primary nursery area and would have a
recommended in water work moratorium of Feb 15 to September 30. WRC also request
this structure to be replaced with a bridge.
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program NC wildlife
Resources Commission
1142 1 -85 Service Rd.
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: 919 - 528 -9886 ext. 6
Fax: 919 - 528 -9839
Travis.wilson @ncwildlife.org
- - - -- original Message---- -
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:27 PM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: Beaufort 126
Hey Mr. Travis ... Division 2 plans to replace Beaufort 126, Bridge to Pipe; and we
would like to know if a moratorium exists in this location... Many Thanks ... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Page 1

BEAUFORT 126 BRIDGE TO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
SR 1725, PAMLICO BEACH ROAD OVER JORDAN CREEK
REPLACE EXISTING 35' LONG BY25.3' (OUT TO OUT) TIMBER BRIDGE
WITHA 50' X 33' CORED SLAB BRIDGE
RANSOMVILLE USGS QUAD MAPAND PAMLICO HUC 03020104
SHEET NUMBER 15 OF THE SOIL FIRM PANEL 7602 J
SURVEY OFBEAUFORT COUNTY MAPNUMBER 3720760200 J
JORDAN CREEK SA;HQ W;NS W MAY16, 2013
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.14 TAR PAMLICO BASIN
3
G o
cu
ov
Z
SR #1 71g W a
�C
^0,
U) �a
dL
Odd
S An
S Savanna
d
d 060126
S Savanna R h`~ch
R
N
BEAUFORT 126
Y= 631845.1238 w r E
Y= 2703925.6192
N35 A -27'47" s Cn
W 76 ^ -38! 09" h'a
/�js C7 Co
N35.463072 DEGREES cc
F
m
W 76.635772 DEGREES g a
Cu
1 inch = 2,000 feet
0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400
Feet

A' BEAUFORT 126
BRIDGE TO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
�. SR 1725, PAMLICO BEACH ROAD OVER JORDAN CREEK
REPLACE EXISTING 35' LONG BY25.2' (OUT TO OUT) TIMBER BRIDGE
._ WITHA 50' X 33' CORED SLAB BRIDGE
RANSOMVILLE VSGS QUAD MAPAND PAMLICO HUC 03020104
SHEET NUMBER 15 OF THE SOIL FIRM PANEL 7602 J
SURVEY OFBEAUFORT COUNTY M4PNUMBER 3720760200 J
} JORDAN CREEK SA;HQW;NSW MAY 16, 2013
r WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.14 TAR PAMLICO BASIN
Sr
A
i #1 718 3. 5, 4
- •-t.� �a _....+� ii :- "h_ ° �� -`• a � r.. 1•yr ` is /� • ".�`i2
tnsrkadvtli off �R
'NJIWA
. anna Rd
S gav
Ut
BEAUFORT 126
'- Y= 631845.1238
W E ,:•'
- �- Y= 2703925.6192
' N35^- 27'-47" ca. - `: dry_ s
c : ` •- a '
W 76 ^- 38' -09" �= Sd� ? `" �T `
N35.463072 DEGREES
W 76.635772 DEGREES ``°
`'�i 1 �0 :t ,` _ -. J ate' '' ' ' , i+ -- r -•^.,. .., :�` •. �`: f, /F � ,. � `' -
�• ;::Y•e; "" { it ''`. wx, _
1 inch = 2,000 feet
0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400
Feet

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
11 -11 -0066
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Str. 060126 County: Beaufort
WBSNo: 17BP.2.R.14 Document. Minimum Criteria Sheet
F.A. No: N/A Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: RGP 31 and CAMA (1)
Project Description: Bridge No. 126, a timber bridge measuring 35' long by 28' wide, on SR 1725
(Pamlico Beach Road) over Jordan Creek, is to be replaced by a proposed pipe and /or aluminum box
culvert. Bridge No. 126 was originally built in 1964. Per the submitted form, the Area of Potential
Effects (APE) measures approximately 500' from either end of the bridge, and extends 30' out from the
centerline of the road, staying entirely within the existing ROW for SR 1725.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on
Thursday, December 1, 2011. A comprehensive archaeological survey at this particular bridge location
has never been conducted. No archaeological sites have been recorded within one -half mile of the
proposed project. Digital copies of HPO's maps (Ransomville Quadrangle) as well as the HPOWEB
GIS Service (http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb/) were reviewed on Monday, December 5, 2011. There are no
known historic architectural resources located within the project area that may have intact
archaeological deposits within the footprint of the proposed project. In addition, topographic maps,
historic maps (NCMaps website), USDA soil survey maps, and aerial photographs were utilized and
inspected to gauge environmental factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric settlement
within the project limits, and to assess the level of modern, slope, agricultural, hydrological, and other
erosive -type disturbances within and surrounding the archaeological APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
All proposed project activities are to take place within the existing 60' ROW for SR 1725 (Pamlico
Beach Road). Although this is a State - funded project, Federal permits are required. Also, NC GS 121 -
12a does not apply since there are no eligible or potentially eligible (i.e. National Register- listed)
archaeological resources located within the project's Area of Potential Effects (APE) that would require
our attention. A review of USGS maps, Web Soil Survey ( http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov /app), and
Beaufort County GIS reveal a project area (i.e. APE) composed four (4) soil types: Altavista fine sandy
loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (AaA), Augusta fine sandy loam (At), Currituck muck, frequently flooded
(Cu), and Tomotley fine sandy loam (To). Bridge No. 126 is scheduled to be replaced by a smaller
structure (i.e. a pipe or an aluminum box culvert) with all activities to occur within the existing ROW
for SR 1725. A road widening project within the vicinity (SR 1723 — ER 07 -2366) was said to have a
low probability for NRHP - eligible archaeological sites based on its topographic setting. With that in
mind and the limited width of the ROW corridor, the current project as proposed is considered to have a
low potential for containing intact archaeological materials on account of the level of disturbance
associated with maintaining the existing ROW for SR 1725. Therefore, an archaeological survey is not
"No Survey Required" form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified to the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups

recommended. However, if the description of this project changes and /or design plans are made
available prior to construction, then additional consultation will be required. As currently proposed, this
bridge replacement project is unlikely to affect any significant NRHP - eligible archaeological resources.
No further archaeological work is recommended.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL - NO SURVEY REQUIRED
E haeology Historic Architecture (Circle One)
December 5, 2011
NCDOT Cultural
Date
,- . <,.
17,18 Winsteadvil, 1722
«
• r% Winste d 1.
A
n • Bridge No. 126
41
41*
Ax
Ilk
4(1
Capx =IGAIEG'i 29KU3 kN4asa 1 .'./ •
Figure 1: Ransomville, N.C. Quadrangle (USGS 1951 [PR1983]).
"No Survey Required "form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups

{_F#�
J� �...,•.. --.-'" i'"F L t f ° 4 0.a x.
r
s A: t u.4i!s v Y e n
fit, r f." ,r�s, (t'' t(�"3,•iz�.`5 t,t,t.. t��p .�' $•' .,,k,' i ,. i 4..
�!. t3 + .. 4 ^r � (`(t +. FC'`
ti� ; �`n• } R. t, � �J� F .4 'M`2z` '�. a/�' � r j;. � �R� ` 12� � ��
•a' t �} Vt { !(t t �� �` 1 .2 1 �` � 4� t` Ya �' + Y t 3 a i '�,. -^� � � (p i 3 �
•g 9.� �'� h �'��� fix: f`'� E )�c-r� •" �'� `3�"tS'x'� .' �"tY' z � � ", :� � v � � � ,
i
� .r t rig �e l r t ,. K�� 9,F ' v
+ %'R G
�Y i fr B CU `v s mss-
.��: t"v r� • '- -s .xr"� �r�t ���A,�t `n .� � ti'� � . ^�s"'tL t�s, if ,��,
ft 9' � � '•� �... � `' yur�`A -+s,. A f!"%' k+' +3 � � � .4 �' �%�a 1 ' "' N'i
7
Mr
���
A M '3.'•wr 3 s +.. M'S��, SAM ,, •.y a $ r ..
pp pp
4r- jil vu
•� t
(Pamlico Beach Road)
o
Beaufort County, NC k
Streets
Beaufort 2-ft Contours
Area of Potential Effects (APE) �A I
Beaufort County Soils
`''ig1 �� \Y:. tM }�t'R����� _ '^'9' � � # � 4 e�` '� ° � �� � +alt^ ?�„e•' � ., f
•. 1 1' -'. l' ""..ate Ih0 ^ r ��
Unnamed Tributaries
t t ��
w(s� �yy vc� +w + sl ra r
Named Streams x s °� y,a
0 37.5 75 150 225 30( 4

?'
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
(HA)11 -11 -0066
NO PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC PROPERTIES
PRESENT /AFFECTED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No: 17BP.2. R.14
F.A. No:
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? X Yes No
County: Beaufort
Document:
Funding: X State Federal
Permit Type: RGP 31 and CAMA
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 126 on SR 1725 (Pamlico Beach Road) over Jordan
Creek (no off -site detour planned).
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) reviewed the subject project and determined:
Historic Architecture /Landscapes
There are no National Register - listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of potential
effects.
There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G
within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not meet the
criteria for listing on the National Register.
❑ All properties greater than 50 years of age located in the APE have been considered and all compliance
for historic architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121 -12(a) has
been completed for this project.
X There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as,
needed)
Archaeology
❑ There are no National Register- listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of potential
effects.
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible
for the National Register.
❑ All identified Archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for
archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121 -12(a)
has been completed for this project.
There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as
needed)
"No Historic Properties Present "form for Minor 7rmupor/ation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups

SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: HPOWeb reviewed on 5
December 2011 and yielded no NR, SS, SL, DE, or LD properties in the project area. Beaufort County
current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information (viewed 5 December 2011) suggested the
presence of properties containing pre -1962 resources in the Area of Potential Effects (APE), and a field
survey accordingly was conducted on 15 December 2011. The APE extends 600 feet to either end of the
existing bridge (N -S) and 100 feet to either side of the existing SR 1725 (Pamlico Beach Road) centerline
to encompass all proposed construction activities as currently defined. Constructed in 1964, Bridge No.
126 is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge
Survey as it is not historically, architecturally, or technologically significant. A commercial and two
residential buildings stand at the SR 1725 (Pamlico Beach Road) /SR 1722 (S. Savanna Road) intersection
(Winsteadville), approximately 500 feet north of the existing Bridge No. 126. The defining elements of
the properties are located beyond project impact. The APE, including the permit area, does not contain
properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places. A finding of "no historic properties affected"
will satisfy both GS 121 -12(a) and Section 106 compliance requirements for historic architecture.
Should any aspect, Including an off -site detour and related improvements, of the project
change, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Location map; photographs are on file NCDOT — Historic Architecture
Signed:
Cultural Resources Specialist, NCDOT
"No Historic Properties Present "form for Minor 7hotsportation Projects as Qualified to the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups
Date

r
BEAUFORT 126 BRIDGE TO PIPE REPLACEMENT
SR 1725, PAMLICO BEACH ROAD OVER JORDAN CREEK
REPLACE EXISTING 35' LONG BY25.2' (OUT TO OUT) TIMBER BRIDGE
WITHA PIPEBOX CULVERT
RANSOMVILLE USGS QUAD MAPAND PAMLICO 03020104
SHEET NUMBER 15 OF THE SOIL FIRM PANEL 7602 J
SURVEYOFBEAUFORT COUNTY MAP NUMBER 3720760200 J
JORDAN CREEK SA, HQW,NSW NOVEMBER 4, 2011
I WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.14 TAR PAMLICO BASIN
gr
�R#1 718
,r
,/r „•r;.X ti =^ .+ ;+rSx"• "-_'+_ _ /. ,J`L. oft- - .%:1\
1JI �..
_ �� .�••� _ ^ ' •_ � `\ � BYO• S`�4�
�� a 1 122 'ZJ '
'l7ls instTdvily :
`J / a
8b 9 In
gavanna Rd
N F -'
BEAUFORT 126 11
Y= 631845.1238 � 4_::
j w E
Y= 2703925.6192
N35 ^- 27' -47" �� : ; "'r d S r`)
N 35.463072 DEGREES
W 76.635772 DEGREES
fd,Y/�
".,r`' 1 inch= 2,000 feet
0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400
Feet
,oeRNSOM V/L LE
/-?602.R -1`l
rhLk,z) nb . /1- 11 -oa66

ZR Z;
Z a� �'
u l
w a z8 8 a8
�m
•
■
■
lOOZ N /£B OVN
OIaO ON
W
J
Q
J �
LL- j
OO
Q � N
LLJ m M�
W
v � c)
is Q �CQ
��QM Q: Q--
�>QZ M C)z� Q�
I ca
�QQ LLJ -c)c) �LoW
O
m3a(n iii
�VLo U Z�)Ijp���l-
N N Q NO CQ
I�CL mL.Ljzz�=0J�I-Z N
ONZ���VO O�J
Q`OJm�Li -i J��CNW
m��LQ.��Q3u)
Q
Q
Q�
N II
o cn
n
V) CL
J
ti
W3
3�
ti
W�
30�
a-
U
oO
� — k
` •OJ ,� II
- o
L�
I
w_ tiM1/
0
a=
O �
�
CD
O
0
z
C:) Z
Q
,00'09
N
X
W
w
i
a-
U
oO
� — k
` •OJ ,� II
- o
L�
41-16 I�F —
R K
P� 30 �pPL
SNOISIA311
U
3>
O
D
Z J
a�
av
� O
Q Q
U
I
J
Q
o
,6'O =WMH
2
H
Q
U
W
Q
U
�v N
W
D��w
Z
Z
O
m
lipp
Ll 07
O 11
M to
u
� D
J
W3
3
ti
W�
30a
ysd- 9219 \9ZI'+
-• cn
U�
M
Q M
O �
t� VQ1
O Q'
\1 P
N
LU
ti W W 3
3
tin
W Q
O p Q O
0
I
w_ tiM1/
0
I
O �
O
w —Lo
C:) Z
Q
Q � a
41-16 I�F —
R K
P� 30 �pPL
SNOISIA311
U
3>
O
D
Z J
a�
av
� O
Q Q
U
I
J
Q
o
,6'O =WMH
2
H
Q
U
W
Q
U
�v N
W
D��w
Z
Z
O
m
lipp
Ll 07
O 11
M to
u
� D
J
W3
3
ti
W�
30a
ysd- 9219 \9ZI'+
-• cn
U�
M
Q M
O �
t� VQ1
O Q'
\1 P
N
LU
ti W W 3
3
tin
W Q
O p Q O
0

z
z2 z;
u
WN
J
W �
Q 3
03
a
LLJ
w
W tiff
z
mg ��
�3
J
_ - -- -�� o
100.09
Q
N
.aa z`
O
U
Z
ads
N
U)
p
w
.''
0
°z wz
S
m
30�
W �
z8 a
W
=
U 2
D
m
Q:
LLJ
o'
W 3
r
a
i
W
0
Z
a
O
C)
Q
o
CD
2'
0
Q
N
W
LOOZ S8SN /C9 OVN
OI80 ON
J ~
V
O
� Q � N
w m °°
Q)
Q) � C13 W W
Q Q �
O Q Q- W j
Q-p (n Q-) 4j V �
QWO� i� �Q-
W Z)
LL- I W O W LA- om3�(/��n~` J�
NOM W N c Q: Z
NiNQ N
urt.�Wb
I�a- O:�jI-:Z-N
C 2 � W,
ONZ �Op OQ- -I�
jN- QmCn W iii Q��W
:�z c) Q:) (3
V) re) Qz nQ. I- :zQ � (n
66 /Ll /8
Q
L" �
vQi u
o �
ti Q.
Q Q
�P
�� REEK
2
u
�
J
W �
Q 3
03
W�
LLJ
�JO 0
W tiff
OL
�3
�oo�
_ - -- -�� o
100.09
�
N
x
x
w
Iw
�P
�� REEK
2
u
�
J
W �
Q 3
03
W�
LLJ
�JO 0
W tiff
OL
�3
�oo�
_ - -- -�� o
x
Lc,::
o
� N
2 U,
8
�
ti3
W
3
W
9
m
30�
I
ti W W c ti
2
W
ti o
2
U 2
D
m
Q:
LLJ
Ir
W 3
r
W
i
W
0
Z
a
O
C)
Q
r
a
2'
0
Q
W
e�
0
�P
�� REEK
LL-
SNOISIMS
r 11
ll
I.
li I
/1►
�1
1
i
V
N �
= N
m N
Op O
� N
Q
Ln
N
U
3>
O
iLL
ATV-
�� -if
/ I
/
Q
U
ME
w
Q
2
U
61 1
N
ev�
GR F-
x,41
J i �
�I
< P�pNG
Q C
p] U
0
,6.0 =WMH
� OL(d(:/v
P�-pNG
0
< N
Q O
C
a�
Q
W V)
I ra,
Lu
0
=ate
I � (.D
�W
oc�I. �
Q
O
0
Z
U 8 Q
Q
O U
Z J
a�
Qv
� O
Q
U
(E)
0
to
�8
to
N II
O N
II
J
Q3
3�
WV�
¢
3WO�
x
F—
w
z
Y
O
m
N
M
7
Q
M
u6p•�a:eMw�oz s -Z
i N
P II
OM �
u
ti
ti3
3�
Wcti
¢
30 Ell
�
J
W �
Q
WO
W�
_
II
W tiff
OL
�3
�oo�
t`
x
Lc,::
o
� N
2 U,
8
�
ti3
W
3
a
ti
W�
m
30�
_ J
ti W W c ti
2
W
ti o
2
U 2
i
Q:
LLJ
Ir
W 3
r
Q
W
2
2
LL-
SNOISIMS
r 11
ll
I.
li I
/1►
�1
1
i
V
N �
= N
m N
Op O
� N
Q
Ln
N
U
3>
O
iLL
ATV-
�� -if
/ I
/
Q
U
ME
w
Q
2
U
61 1
N
ev�
GR F-
x,41
J i �
�I
< P�pNG
Q C
p] U
0
,6.0 =WMH
� OL(d(:/v
P�-pNG
0
< N
Q O
C
a�
Q
W V)
I ra,
Lu
0
=ate
I � (.D
�W
oc�I. �
Q
O
0
Z
U 8 Q
Q
O U
Z J
a�
Qv
� O
Q
U
(E)
0
to
�8
to
N II
O N
II
J
Q3
3�
WV�
¢
3WO�
x
F—
w
z
Y
O
m
N
M
7
Q
M
u6p•�a:eMw�oz s -Z
i N
P II
OM �
u
ti
ti3
3�
Wcti
¢
30 Ell
9219 \9Zll loo
�
J
W �
Q
WO
W�
_
Lg
_~ (n LLJ
W tiff
OL
�3
�oo�
t`
Ln
Lc,::
o
� N
2 U,
8
LLJ W
~ O
Q
ct: W
2 WN 2 m
a
ti
Y J
Q oo�
ti W W c ti
2
0 3
2 s
ti o
2
U 2
9219 \9Zll loo
LL, cc
M
M M
O
t`
o
� N
o
M Q
u
F�
II
In
Q:
LLJ
W
3
W 3
3
W
�
2
O
U
O V
ti
0
9219 \9Zll loo