HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191416_Handouts_20080701NC DTFINR M,',QIO
M-Suilace'Wator Protedlim
1. 1101-
19
Thursday July 17, 2008
19 91k
Lisa Feller
Please bring this packet
to the meeting.
AGENDA
Eastern Concurrence Meeting
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Board Room, Transportation Building
Raleigh, North Carolina
1:00 PM to 3:00 PM, Lisa Feller, NCDOT PDEA Branch
TIP No. R -2527, R -2530 B, B -4474 — NC 24 -27 widening from NC 740 in Albemarle in
Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, west of Troy, in Montgomery County.
Montgomery & Stanly County, Divisions 8 & 10
Team Members:
Richard Spencer, USACE
Lisa Feller, PDEA
Felix Davila, FHWA
Chris Militscher, USEPA
Gary Jordan, FWS
Polly Lespinasse, DWQ
Travis Wilson, WRC
Renee Gledhill - Earley, SHPO
Hannah Cockburn, Piedmont Triad RPO
Dana Stoogenke, Rocky River, RPO
NCDOT Technical Support Staff and Other Agency Staff:
Kathy Matthews, USEPA
Karen Compton, USFS
Tim Johnson, Division 8
John Olinger, Division 8
Barry Moose, Division 10
Tawana Brooks, Division 10
Roger Thomas, Roadway Design
Sam St. Clair, Roadway Design
Tony Houser, Roadway Design
Lee Moore, Roadway Design
Jay Twisdale, Hydraulics
Mohammed Mulla, Geotechnical Unit
Hemal Shah, TPB
Michael Orr, TPB
Ed Lewis, HEU
Mary Pope Furr, HEU
Rachelle Beauregard, NEU
Teresa Hart, PDEA
Eric Midkiff, PDEA
Beverly Robinson, PDEA
* The purpose of this meeting is to reach Concurrence on CPl & CP 2.
Purpose and Need
and
Preliminary Alternatives
For NC 24 -27
From NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County
to the Troy Bypass in Montgomery County
Stanly and Montgomery Counties
TIP Projects R- 2530B, B -4974 and R -2527
North Carolina Department of Transportation
`�OF NO�lN ,f J4�
X
m x
0
yyf�ror n.NSeCgo-
CONCURRENCE POINTS 1 and 2
July 17, 2008
Prepared By
Lisa M. Feller, PE
Project Planning Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
PURPOSE AND NEED AND
PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVES
NC 24 — 27 WIDENING
TIP PROJECTS R-253013, B-4974 AND R-2527
STANLY AND MONTGOMERY COUNTIES
PURPOSE OF TODAY'S MEETING
The purpose of today's meeting is to present information to the Merger Team
concerning the purpose of and need for the proposed projects, define the study corridor,
and determine project alternatives to be studied in detail for TIP Projects R-2530B,
B-4974, and R-2527. Formal concurrence on the purpose of and need for the projects
and the study corridor (Concurrence Point 1) and alternatives to be studied in detail
(Concurrence Point 2) will be requested.
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) 2009-2015
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) includes a highway project in Stanly County
(TIP Project R-2530B) from NC 740 in Albemarle to the west end of the Pee Dee River
Bridge. Also, the TIP includes the Pee Dee River Bridge replacement project in Stanly
County (TIP Project B-4974). Furthermore, the TIP includes a highway project in
Montgomery County (TIP Project R-2527) from the east end of the Pee Dee River Bridge
to the Troy Bypass (TIP Project R-623) west of the city of Troy (See Vicinity Map, Figure
1 and Quad Maps, Figures 2A and 2B). All three projects will be studied under one
NEPA study. While these projects are programmed in the TIP, no decisions have been
made about the final location of the road or other alternatives to be studied. A multi-
lane facility is proposed in the TIP; therefore,
, ", ' accommodate , " "
anticipated` hat�1 50�L'�200'f iefbf rig'h't cif bo,�roqujred �td:6660'itiiiio�aa' , e
";,� � e��, �, " � �,,
Oro s pr0V ments,,
� 06 'b'd 4m" �
PROJECT PURPOSE
V traffl&11 6Ww ih- level of service - bh't
=through the :'project 'study , aypp$,
In a "no build scenario", the projected traffic along several segments of NC 24-27 would
exceed capacity, thus resulting in deficient levels of service along those segments. This
increases the potential for accidents, and contributes to the inefficient operation of motor
vehicles. The proposed facility would provide congestion relief to NC 24-27 as well as in
the City of Albemarle.
• Mai, nta J,n abridge acrogs'the, Pee Dee ,,River 'that ad&6ss6 the needs of
highway,: users.,i
The bridge is considered structurally
deficient. Replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer and more efficient
traffic operations.
PROJECT NEED
The primary needs of the proposed action include the following:
• Transportatioh"d"e'fi",ci'e'n'c"ie"'g' exist t"', : along,Nt"24,47 in the project study,, reap,
and., aye projected, to, *Wol�ubstahtlodly by the, year, 2030',4
WMWA&
The current traffic volumes on the facility range from 6,100 vehicles per day to 14,500
vehicles per day. By the year 2030, the volumes are anticipated to range from 12,600
vehicles per day to 30,000 vehicles per day (See Traffic Forecasts, Figures 5A to 5D).
Currently, portions of NC 24-27 operate at level of service (LOS) E. In 2030, NC 24-27,
within the study corridor, is expected to operate at level of service (LOS) F without the
proposed improvements,
gash t rt lys rt;slalt; fr ®m September'1;= 2003 tb August 31; =2045 hq ,that.4he,,overall
ra _
1h, ra tes:th rough,, the project area e
_pp _gIQ w h J t wide and critical crash rates�
However,, the't-ru'dk', 'crOgh "r8iteg Vere,'over,2,51iff6s, higher than the,,,2003 to 200&
statewide 1r0ck,"brash; I rates'," Lane departure and rear-end crashes were the majority of
the overall accidents occurring during this time period.
These projected deficiencies would cause significant travel delay, increase the potential
for accidents, and contribute to the inefficient operation of motor vehicles,
• Bridge No. 51 over the Pee Dee River is considered structurally deficient
and is eligible for the Federal-Aid Highway Bridge Program.
The James B. Garrison Bridge (Swift Island Ferry Bridge) is a four-span, open spandrel
arch, concrete bridge built in 1927,
, Top
b ridg.e
=is,;,onerof seven ,bridges,of.it ype
ining in,North,Carolina,and-it,is";iigible,forthe Natiotial Register ,of,,Historic,P
laces,.,
Bridge No. 50, adjacent to Bridge No. 51, carries two lanes of traffic east toward Troy,
Bridge No. 51; however, carries only one lane of traffic west toward Albemarle because
of its narrow bridge width and deterioration issues. Components of the concrete
structure have experienced an increasing degree of deterioration that cannot be easily
addressed by maintenance activities. Thp deck ,is,,cracking,,,i spailingi and there is �u ,,,.,
,e xpos ed'e6t5eW.,1' The bridge ig', approach i ng the e
,bridg ewi 11, result, in , safer, traffic,,operatip qri,s and:', will allow Jwo,,n,WJr_ I a f 9
,We,sJlbpund travel., ilIff','
2,7 corridor as, part of the Sti
Carolina Intrastate Zystemi,,
The Strategic Highway Corridor concept represents a timely initiative to protect the
mobility and connectivity functions of critical highway facilities, while promoting
environmental stewardship through maximizing the use of existing facilities to the extent
possible, and fostering economic prosperity by being able to move people and goods
quickly and efficiently. The concept offers NCDOT and its stakeholders an opportunity
4 4
to consider long-term vision, consistency in decision-making, land use partnerships, and
overarching design and operational changes.
NC 24-27 from Charlotte to Fayetteville has been designated as strategic highway
corridor #25 for the following reasons:
a. NC 24-27 from Charlotte to Fayetteville is a major statewide and regional facility
throughout central North Carolina and is the main route connecting the Charlotte
and Fayetteville activity centers. The Charlotte area is considered an activity
center as it is an MPO and is home to a major airport (Charlotte-Douglas
International Airport) and a major intermodal connector/inland terminal (Charlotte
Inland Terminal). The Fayetteville area is considered an activity center as it is an
MPO and is home to two major military bases (Fort Bragg and Pope Air Force
Base) and a major airport (Fayetteville Regional Airport).
b. This corridor provides a connection between multiple interstate facilities: 1-485, 1-
73174, and 1-295,
(See Strategic Highway Corridor Map, Figure 4A) This corridor has also been
designated as a part of the North Carolina Intrastate System and is envisioned as an
Expressway in the future.
In 1989, the North Carolina legislature established the Intrastate System "to provide
high-speed, safe travel service throughout the State. It connects major population
centers both inside and outside the State and provides safe, convenient through-travel
for motorists, It is designed to support statewide growth and development objectives
and to connect to major highways of adjoining states." (See Intrastate System Map,
Figure 413)
STUDY CORRIDOR
I,A,'500466t:study corridor consisting ,,Qf
,f,romNQ 7,4Q ,in Albemarle to the ,pro,pgse,,O",,Troy 13ypa�=s, we,5tof Troy; is, proposed ,,for
the _,projeqt§,, This 500-foot corridor will extend north approximately 2500' and south
approximately 3200' along a railroad on the eastern portion of the project as well. (See
Figures 6A to 6U).
PROJECT SCHEDULEISTATUS
TIP Project R-2527 is programmed in the 2009-2015 Transportation Improvement
Program with right-of-way acquisition scheduled to begin in State Fiscal Year (SFY)
2011 and construction to begin in SFY 2014.
TIP Project B-4974 is programmed in the 2009-2015 Transportation Improvement
Program with right-of-way acquisition scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY)
2011 and construction to begin in FFY 2013,
TIP Project R-2530B is programmed in the 2009-2015 Transportation Improvement
Program with right-of-way acquisition scheduled to begin in State Fiscal Year (SFY)
2013 and construction is unfunded.
A scoping meeting for R -2527 was held on September 20, 2001. A Citizens'
Informational Workshop for both R -2527 and B -4974 was held on September 7, 2004.
Approximately 37 people attended the workshop. The public was concerned about the
forest and maintaining recreational activities in the forest and river area. A NEPA
4041Merger 01 Concurrence Point 1 Meeting for R -2527 was held on February 23, 2006.
The merger team did not concur with the purpose and need statement and study corridor
based on logical termini issues (See pages 6 through 8 for Meeting Minutes).
A scoping meeting for R -25308 was held on January 14, 2004. A Citizens' Informational
Workshop was held on March 29, 2004. Approximately 68 people attended the
workshop. The public, town officials, and business owners voiced concerns regarding a
raised median facility in Albemarle.
Based on recommendations made by Richard Spencer, US Army Corps of Engineers, a
Federal Environmental Assessment (EA) will be completed that will include TIP Projects
R- 2530B, B -4974 and R -2527. The EA is scheduled to be completed in late 2009 with a
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to follow in late 2010.
ALTERNATIVES
A. No -Build Alternative
The No -Build Alternative would not provide any substantial improvements to the
NC 24 -27 study corridor. Only typical maintenance activities would be provided
along NC 24 -27. NC 24 -27 would remain a two -lane facility with one lane in each
direction and turn lanes at intersections. The No -Build Alternative would incur
neither right -of -way or construction costs. There would be no short -term
disruptions along existing roadways during construction. There would be no
impacts to streams, wetlands, or other natural and cultural resources, nor any
residential or business relocation. However, the No -Build Alternative would not
meet the purposes of and needs identified for the proposed projects. It would not
improve traffic flow, and level of service (LOS) on the section of NC 24 -27
through the project study areas. The structural deficiencies of the James B.
Garrison Bridge would not be addressed. The No -Build Alternative provides a
basis for comparing the adverse impacts and benefits of the study alternatives.
B. Alternative Modes of Transportation
The project study area is not currently served by mass transit. Stanly and
Montgomery Counties provide van service for residents in need of transportation.
Rail and bus service in the project area would not serve the purpose of and need
for the proposed projects.
C. Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Alternative
Transportation Systems Management (TSM) improvements involve increasing
the available capacity of the roadway within the existing right -of -way with
minimum capital expenditures and without reconstructing or adding additional
through lanes to the existing road. Addition of turn lanes, striping, signing,
signalization, and minor realignments are examples of TSM physical
improvements. Examples of TSM operational improvements include traffic law
enforcement, speed restrictions, access control, and signal timing changes. TSM
improvements alone will not increase capacity or improve levels of service
enough to prevent failing traffic conditions in the future 2030 design year.
D. Build Alternatives
The Build Alternatives listed below will involve widening the existing roadway to a
multi-lane, divided facility with a 23-foot raised grass median with curb and gutter
and sidewalks on both sides of the road from NC 740 to Sweet Home Church
Road. From Sweet Home Church Road to the proposed Troy Bypass (TIP
Project No. R-623), a multi-lane, divided facility with a 46-foot depressed median
and grass shoulders is proposed. Figures 6A to 6U provide maps of the
environmental and community data for each alternative. Table 1 provides an
evaluation of each alternative with respect to physical, human and natural
resource impacts.
t ,Byild,AlternOt1ve 1,'� Asymmetrical W�donincl,tt ttte'Nbrth "`1 ,
This alternative will widen NC 24-27 asymmetrically to the north. See Table 1 for
impacts associated with Build Alternative 1.
Build Alternative 2 - Asymmetrical Widen J nq to the SdOthP'
This alternative will widen NC 24_27 asymmetrically to the south. See Table 1 for
impacts associated with Build Alternative 2.
Build
This alternative will widen NC 24-27 at locations that "best fit" the current road
location and surrounding land uses. "Best fit" locations were evaluated and selected
to improve the existing road alignment, minimize impacts, and permit maintenance of
traffic during construction. See Table 1 for impacts associated with Build Alternative
3.
guild, Alternative, 3A 13ridqe Avoid an OeAlternative f
This section of the "best fit" alternative will widen NC 24-27 to avoid impacts to the
James B. Garrison Bridge which is eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places. See Table 1 for impacts associated with Build Alternative 3A.
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
MEMORANDUM TO
FROM:
SUBJECT:
�STAYE
a �tl�6
r.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
March 2, 2006
Meeting Participants
Edwin A. Peters
Project Development Engineer
Concurrence Point 1 Meeting Minutes for R -2527,
NC 24 -27 Widen to Multi -lanes from NC 73 to the Troy Bypass
Montgomery County
On Thursday, February 23, 2006, a meeting was held in the Transportation Building Board Room
for the subject project. The attendees of the meeting were as follows:
Edwin Peters NCDOT /Project Development and Environmental Analysis (PDEA)
Drew Joyner NCDOT /PDEA
Eric Midkiff NCDOT /PDEA
Ryan Hough
Lisa Feller
Rachel Evans
Sarah McBride
Polly Lespinasse
Travis Wilson
Gary Jordan
Chris Militscher
Roger Thomas
Sam St. Clair
John Olinger
Karen Compton
Hanna Cockburn
Hemal Shah
Richard Spencer
Rachelle Beauregard
NCDOT /PDEA
NCDOT /PDEA
NCDOT /PDEA
Department of Cultural Resources /State Historic Preservation Office
(HPO)
Department of Environment and Natural Resources /Department of
Water Quality (NCDWQ)
NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
NCDOT /Roadway Design (RDWY)
NCDOT/ (RDWY)
NCDOT /Division 8
United States Forest Service (USFS)
Piedmont Triad RPO (PTRPO)
NCDOT /Transportation Planning Branch (TPB)
US Army Corp of Engineers (USAGE)
NCDOT[iNatural Environment Unit (NEU)
Erica McLamb
NCDOT/ NEU
Sara Easterly
NCDOT/ NEU
Susan Thebert
NCDOT/ NEU
Steve Gurganus
NCDOT /Human Environment Unit (HEU)
Shantray Avent
NCDOT/ HEU
Mark Staley
NCDOT/ Roadside Environmental Unit (REU)
Sandra Stepney
NCDOT /RDWY
Roy Shelton
NCDOT /PDEA
Greg Thorpe
NCDOT /PDEA
The objective of the meeting was to come to an agreement on the purpose and need and study area
for the subject project.
Edwin Peters opened the meeting with introductions of attendees followed by a Powerpoint
presentation. The presentation included slides that depicted the follow: an agenda, project
description, revised project description, project status /schedule, vicinity map, Division 8 TIP map,
project purpose, project need, traffic volume /capacity, mobility and connectivity (i.e. SHC and
intrastate system), purpose and need summary, study area.
Major topics of discussion are shown below:
The project description has been revised to exclude the Pee Dee River so that the project begins at
NC 73 which is a more logical terminus. The bridge over the river (B -4974) will be included with
TIP Project R -2530.
The project is located between TIP Project #'s R -2530 (NC 24127 widening in Stanley Co.) and R-
623 (Troy Bypass).
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service, noted that the project purpose and need was stated
differently in the merger packet than in the presentation.
Edwin stated that the need statement on the signature sheet would reflect what was in the packet and
not the power point slide.
Gary asked that "decline" be changed to "increase" regarding the "transportation deficiencies" in
the need statement. This change was made on the signature sheet.
Edwin showed how the study corridor had been expanded along the —Y- lines and at the railroad to
make sure that these areas were covered.
Karen Compton, US Forest Service, said that there are many archaeological sites along the project
corridor. There is a major site on the eastern end that may require recovery.
Gary Jordan discussed that surveys will be needed for bald eagles, Schweinitz's sunflower, the
Georgia aster (not endangered, but a candidate), etc. The Forest Service has specific lists to look at
as well. Rachelle Beauregard, NCDOT Natural Enviromnent Unit, stated that we would be doing
the surveys in- house.
Gary Jordan also mentioned that a Section 7 Consultation would be different because the project
goes through the Uwharrie National Forest and could be classified as "a take ".
The northern bridge over the Pee Dee River may be historic, and it only has 20' of horizontal
clearance and is striped for 1 lane of traffic. The newer, southern bridge is striped for 2 lanes of
traffic.
Richard Spencer, USAGE, has issues with NC 73 being the logical project terminus. He stated that
from looking at the traffic, R -2527 is not a stand -alone project. (i.e. quieting zone on western end of
project, possibility of precluding other alternatives, etc.) He suggested the possibly of combining
R -2527, B -4974 and R -2530 into one document with phased construction.
NCDOT staff stated that the project did meet the criteria for logical termini and the project was a
stand alone project because:
1. NC 73 is a major route
2. There is evidence of a traffic drop /pick up at NC 73
3. The project is 11 miles long (Le, significant improvement to facility, etc.)
Conclusion:
The team did not agree to concur on purpose and need for the subject project. The meeting was
adjourned.
cc: Meeting Attendees
WN
—
N
=
==00000
00
C)OO
4)
E
QJ
0
r
0
0
0
000
0
0
0
C)
C)
2
m
0
(0
0)
r--
M
T
U')
C3
0
C14
00
Co
C)
M
r--
I
I
4)
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
CL
Z
Z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
>-
0)
W
0
> -
CY)
Co
tT
r--
C)
(D
T7'
LO
C;
� 77
0
C)
�, 77
o
4)
co
144"
cen
I-
N
0
a)
u
o
co
6-01
00
C'14
co
0)
CO
tO
C�
-
C,
(D
'rte
-:zf
-::f
C'i
f
r--
t,:
LL
U-
LE
E
0
U-
co
co
m
C
m
C:
m
I--
U-
J-
AZ-
U-
J_--a
_r_
-0
—:3 0
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
o
0
o >
0
o>
0
o
z
U)
ca
z
V)
ca
z
U)
z
Q)
z(1)<
z
U) l<
z
U)
0
0
T
� C)
0 �2
00 'Cr
0
C) (Y)
(Y) (N
CN co
r-
CO
co m
r-
0 LO
Iti
U)
(1)
U)
U)
z U)
U)
U.
Z
CO
U)
U)
(f)
VP
0
N
(Y)
LO
Co
r-
v
0
Fit
MA
Merger Project Team Meeting Agreement
Concurrence Point No. 1: Project Purpose and Need
Project Name/Description: NC 24-27, Widen to multi-lanes from NC 740 in
Albemarle in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, west
of Troy, in Montgomery County
TIP Projects: R-25306, B-4974 and R-2527
WBS Nos.: 34446.1.6, 39922, 1.1 & 35572. 1.1
The purpose of these projects is to improve traffic flow and level of service (LOS)
on the section of NC 24-27 from NC 740 in Albemarle in Stanly County to the
Troy Bypass, west of Troy, in Montgomery County, and to replace Bridge No. 51
over the Pee Dee River in Stanly County.
The needs to be addressed by these projects include:
• Transportation deficiencies existing along NC 24-27 in the project
study area which are projected to 4"#w substantially by the year
2030. Uk wuc
Bridge No. 51 over the Pee Dee River is considered structurally
deficient and is eligible for the Federal-Aid Highway Bridge Program.
Maintain and improve the mobility and connectivity functions of the
NC 24-27 corridor as part of the Strategic Highway Corridor Vision and
the North Carolina Intrastate System.
The Project Team has concurred on this date of July 17, 2008, on the above
mentioned project purpose and need and attached study corridor maps for TIP
Projects R- 25306, B-4974, and R-2527.
USACOE
USEPA
USES
WRC
DWQ
NCDOT
USFWS
FHWA
SHPO
Merger Project Team Meeting Agreement
Concurrence Point No. 2: Preliminary Alternatives to be studied in detail
Project Name /Description: NC 24 -27, Widen to multi -lanes from NC 740 in Albemarle
in Stanly County to the Troy Bypass, west of Troy, in
Montgomery County
TIP Projects: R- 25306, B -4974 and R -2527
WBS Nos.: 34446.1.6, 39922. 1.1 & 35572. 1.1
Build Alternative 1 - Asvmmetrical Widenina to the North
Build Alternative 2 - Asvmmetrical Widenina to the South
Section 1 — NC 740 to SR 1731
M Section 5 — SR 1774 to NC 73
F]
Section 2 — SR 1731 to SR 1720
F] Section 6—NC 73 to SR 1134
n
Section 3 — SR 1720 to SR 1818
❑ Section 7 — SR 1134 to SR 1550
El
Section 4 — SR 1818 to SR 1774
Build Alternative 2 - Asvmmetrical Widenina to the South
Build Alternative 3 - "Best Fit" Widenina Alternative
0
Section 1 — NC 740 to SR 1731
❑ Section 5 — SR 1774 to NC 73
F]
Section 2 — SR 1731 to SR 1720
n Section 6 — NC 73 to SR 1134
n
Section 3 -- SR 1720 to SR 1818
El Section 7—SR 1134 to SR 1550
El
Section 4 — SR 1818 to SR 1774
Build Alternative 3 - "Best Fit" Widenina Alternative
0
Section 1 — NC 740 to SR 1731
El
F]
Section 2 — SR 1731 to SR 1720
n
Section 3 — SR 1720 to SR 1818
Section 4 — SR 1818 to SR 1774
Build Alternative 3A -- Bridge Avoidance Alternative
Section 5 — SR 1774 to NC 73
Section 6 — NC 73 to SR 1134
Section 5 — SR 1774 to NC 73
Section 6 — NC 73 to SR 1134
Section 7 — SR 1134 to SR 1550
The Project Team has concurred on this date of July 17, 2008, on the above mentioned
preliminary alternatives to be studied in detail for TIP Projects R- 25306, B -4974, and
R -2527,
USACOE NCDOT
USEPA
USFS
WRC
DWQ
USFWS
FHWA
SHPO
00
M C)
0
N
U)
E <
>
—10000000CDO
00
C)
co
cc,
'�—
"-
W
0
0
0
0
LL
OOOCDOO
0000
7
000C>0
Q
0
0
0
0
C>
0
0
0
0
Qa
u
(D
C>
T
0
C>
0
C)
0
0
C)
0
C>
0
CD
0
co
mil
r-
CO
in
0
C)
C14
CO
O
C)
0)
h
4D
AU
0
Vl
C
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
U)
(n
(n
(n
ixmzzzzzzzzzzz
z
>-
>-
>-
>-
CL
(A
C)
CO
0
M
"I
v
C)
C)
C)
N
m
0)
"t
m
m—
f
0
C)
Co
—
Lr)
M
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
00
0
C14
(n
co
r-
co
r-
"
00
f,-
M
U')
0
M
M
OD
E
CN
—
M
T
OD
N
N
(D
7
<Y
LO
OD
�t
r--
CN
m
(1)
't
(0
r
0)
00
N
0
T
T
Cl!
rl-
r14
LO
71'
0
>
Z
LL
LL
(D
i7L
a-
CA
co
CIO
C:
-0
'5
Z3
E
�'
:3
i
5
L
:3
:3
0
0
O
o
>,
0
o
0
o
0
0?
0
0
0
0
z
0)
0
z
(0
z
V)
z
0
z
U)¢
z
U)
z
CO
0
Ln. zf,P
cq
P-�
N
C
0
0
co
0
00
�t
U)
C)
Ct r-
r-
(N �
co
rl-
r-
CO
— SY
LO
CD
V)
r-
00
®
cc
IX
ry
z
U.
Z 0
Cf) U)
U) U)
0 (n
U) 0)
z
C', (Y). V LO (D r-
0
U)
(0
0
E 40—
(0
CL
E
0 a)
_0
U) 0
0
47
0
0
91 "CJ
(D
Co
co
.6
U.
(D
0
�(J)
LV
Ln D
Q)
W
C) (n
a
LL J
3
a
^ I,
V +
a „V
C
L fl
N
Q
cl-
o
I
�
b
U
cr,
U
�
6
LL-
a
q)
_
6
C\J
U �'
d
� (,o
C3
cr-
k
F r GCr LQ
`+J
Q
e. ®....6
c-)
4
N
Q ct_-
da
q
tL5
Cl-
Q-
(z Q
t'
N
rn
e
I,
Cl--
4
� 1
8
Q
03
C)
C)
3
`a
b
N
t�
N�
�4
w
4 "tip
N its) k `"ja
N
14
M
4 � 4
Q
w
N � N
k l
4
A
d
7
4
a
A
1
A
Ui
Q
WNW 77
Ito �6s
Pau N wi
90 lull
IW r' w_
i.. y �
RR
OUKO I wAKI j Mid +
jJ - i� tlEft 111f
i '� Rt � � � j ®�
f`Re![Ghd. t Gti f '
r ilU!
1
U�(I
i I «y
f
et' IJ 9 GikN kw iwoe I
,
�wC4nNU
FOAM KIM
WO
NCO
�� , �'• :i �n'1 , ,, , � PNfl9� �� � N,kwt '� ..., ., � � �. ,� ,•. � `.. �Q i � ,I pi,14 � i �� ���
aP ��
t CO
HN
(Ni'
1
P'o4!fi$t
1
rw«w® h
Ca�'us.l EXISIIN MU111 -I�N�S ' � .
NEED MOO N$ $ f00
AFVt
pp r C fa
URBAN 10�I �
r .o NOAH CANNA
nfrastofe System
4
� ... ...................
s
a
w�
A
c
1*
a
k
�NF
11
L
I■
a
a� 4 0
4 all UI o ..
I M �Gn
� N M
0
a NN
o n
* �4
Z C IA
U
a
a
a!I 2
--- N U
t �
"
N
a
ry F i
M ¢"
pNF
IC
w
+I
E
oI
M
o A� MWW
}w aid.
}�aaaF�
a��Vaal�tw
r�GiiQU�'?
Ala z°l
4�dd W
a�
W
®aG a$
� a
a
7
}
d
tj Q'J
PI AxFf
wul,
Ul�W
0
yjps0
z
p�Wa
tx�3
s�SO
}
"0 0
N
'l
>�
j�U #Qza
a
q Y
w
C7
W >'�r C
X44 � m
Aua a°
I
I
�y
0
a
0 }
}I
�
�Ip a
ol
C spa
¢—�6
yawl
ma
o
w I
�
n
N
tl
Y
4,
Iill
N�
�
% � N Y
n p I
w4
2
m
N
«
�
I
n
� I
a
Y
laq
C
� �
1140 �w
v
a
oar
M
lali
m
w
E
�>
o
�
^ I
�
a
a
a I
I
a
«
i Amnia
e
�
�
a
G
"�
lall
�,
Ixtl
9
G
U
N
8
I
s
It
� I
a
m
104W a
G W 1
C I
d
a
C
o
I
I
YI
&
n
9
ry
a
a� 4 0
4 all UI o ..
I M �Gn
� N M
0
a NN
o n
* �4
Z C IA
U
a
a
a!I 2
--- N U
t �
"
N
a
ry F i
M ¢"
pNF
IC
w
+I
E
oI
M
o A� MWW
}w aid.
}�aaaF�
a��Vaal�tw
r�GiiQU�'?
Ala z°l
4�dd W
a�
W
®aG a$
� a
a
7
}
d
tj Q'J
PI AxFf
wul,
Ul�W
0
yjps0
z
p�Wa
tx�3
s�SO
}
"0 0
N
'l
>�
j�U #Qza
a
q Y
w
C7
W >'�r C
X44 � m
Aua a°
W
i
a
�Q
I> A
�a D
wa z
Qas Q
d Q� .�ldan
a��a{
G 4G aA
a
W
s F. Wi
4 I 4 A �a
N �I
k
a
a p�a
Y �
N 111
L Q
1
U
N
a
0
n
N
0
N
1
a
9 I 0
4
o w-►a � � c u�N-e N
Itq I a « Ikq
All
c �
� a
I �
I
I c
4
t IUI h 0
lul
h �n N � ryNh
c e m
N
n
4
s
Q
oa
N � �
NNa
Rw
NE
$
b
I
a
�
w
y Isil E
}
r
ti
IoW
�
I
y4
j
at
J
M R lEq
F
�
mod«
a
nt
MI
j
I
v
I
I
a
4
� i
0
� I
4
e
0
ari
I I
1 5#-- -1
ISII
i
w a{—u
_
V4, a
N 0
RII
i-'
kq
y
E
N
ti
p
re
Q
Y
N
yM�
'0 C:
t
I
(
a
a�0
d
Htl
&v
(
N
t
U
I
Q Ei1
ti U a 124
m
t.
Nk
N
I
�
a
1
H
y
j
N
o
a
a
I
a
a
L d °�b
M
w p-:+a
6
r~ I
W
i
a
�Q
I> A
�a D
wa z
Qas Q
d Q� .�ldan
a��a{
G 4G aA
a
W
s F. Wi
4 I 4 A �a
N �I
k
a
a p�a
Y �
N 111
L Q
1
U
N
a
0
n
N
0
N
1
a
9 I 0
4
o w-►a � � c u�N-e N
Itq I a « Ikq
All
c �
� a
I �
I
I c
4
t IUI h 0
lul
h �n N � ryNh
c e m
N
n
4
s
Q
oa
N � �
NNa
Rw
NE
h,
IN
LL
1 Ilya 16 C
E g
W
$ Q c4NZ
C
Y
U A
° Wy 7
� p�Q
c
NNM1
AU
b
a
�
w
y Isil E
}
r
ti
IoW
ow
y4
s
at
J
h,
IN
LL
1 Ilya 16 C
E g
W
$ Q c4NZ
C
Y
U A
° Wy 7
� p�Q
c
NNM1
AU
U 0
0 0
Jld 1-
og 4
41
co
N
of
\ SS 41� 4 `oi
og
0
>
w
U 0
0 0
Jld 1-
og 4
41
co
N
of
\ SS 41� 4 `oi
0
>
w
0
0 7
o 0
>
Q Z W U
-
C0
w
>
I UJ iL
N
u
0
N
N
m
r
1i iw
ryq
N
N
r
N
0
40
u
Z0
U
0
N
N
m
r
1i iw
S5 Jl m m
", N!
ot 1 �L �� T, J,
Nd
0
m
N
ryq
N
N
r
N
i
40
u
Z0
U
201
S5 Jl m m
", N!
ot 1 �L �� T, J,
Nd
0
m
N
I
r >0
N
C
N
i
40
u
Z0
U
201
I
r >0
10
>
>
W I
l>w
J
wog
0� OL�- -
> : �
UZ WO 0 -
O 1:01 n.
wzaa
>
LL 10),Z
oww 1 �OW3,
1.12 zb<�400
�, T w omwuujj
60> � 11 lw;�4
W ')2��WD
0210
T
P x o IQ n
C
r
i
40
U
201
z E 41
0 0 r
ul r
N r
0
J z olil
10
>
>
W I
l>w
J
wog
0� OL�- -
> : �
UZ WO 0 -
O 1:01 n.
wzaa
>
LL 10),Z
oww 1 �OW3,
1.12 zb<�400
�, T w omwuujj
60> � 11 lw;�4
W ')2��WD
0210
T
P x o IQ n
.I
LEGEND
EXISTING ROADWAY
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
OR PROPERTY LINE
DWELLING
WIDENING LIMITS
FEDERAL LANP-G4M[[ANOS
HIGH OIJA[Ifl OUTSTANDING
WATER RESOURCES
UWHARRIE NATIONAL FOR[ST
WETLANDS
STREAMS
I
RARE PLANTS
�m
IEGEND
B151ING ROADWAY
BISIING RIGH1 V WAY
OR PROPERLY LINE
.v� OWEIIING
WIDENING IIM11S
UERAI. I.ANHAME[ANOS
HIGH OUALIlY OUISTANDING
UWHARRE 1'
WEILANOS
STREAMS
�r i
I
V9
i n
I--,"
I
I
DISIING ROADRY
EXISTING RIGHT OF WO
OR PROPERTY UNE
DWELING
WINNING UMITS
o��i
�o
DIVING PUDWAY
DIFING RIGHT OF NY
OR PROPERTY LINE
DWEWNG
INNING
FEPERAL [ANO-GAMELAN
HIGH 0111Y 00151001i
WAIEP PESOURCES
:a �< WIONA �OP[
WEUNI)S
SfR[AMS I
m''Alt'l
EXISTING ROADWAY
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
OR PROPRIY LINE
DWELLING
WIDENING LIMITS
��M,,
MkInkli
11GINI)
EXISTING ROADWAY
EXISTING RIGHT OF WV
OR PROPERTY UN[
DWELLING
WIDENING LIMITS
FEO[k [AND•AILA05
HIGH OUALIlY OUISIADNG
WATER RESOURCES
UNRE NVIONA[ FOREST
WETDND$
SIR[AMS
I
RARE PLANTS
EXISTING ROADWAY
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
OR PROPERTY LINE
DWELLING
WIDENING LIMITS
FEDERAL LAND- GAMELANDS
NIGH DUALITY OUTSTANDING
WATER RESOURCES
UWHARRIE NATIONAL FOREST
WETLANDS
STREAMS
RARE PLANTS
ifii HF ENE
K
iE f M
LEGEND
EXISTING ROADWV
NSTING RIGHT OF WAY
OR PROPERTY LINE
DWELLING
WIDENING UVITS
I'M[Rh I-ANMAYUNDS
HIGH OXITY OUTSTANDING
WATER RESOURCES
MARk NATIONAI- FOREST
WETI-ANOS
STREAMS
i PAR[ PLANTS
I= 0
�� J
NOkTH SDE MENNG
05 BEST fl CNN
PROJECT
JECI
R�0 53OB
poi
SOUTH SH ENV
AN[I ANNE hT[RNATNE
LEGEND
EXISTING POUP
EXISTING RIGHT OF WP
OR PROPERTY LINE
WIDENING [IMTS
FEDERAL [K-GAMEIANOS
HIGH OLIA[fl OUTSTANDING
WFIP RESOURCES
UWHARRIE NATIONAL FOREST
WETLANDS
STREAMS
I ME PLANTS
NORTH SE MUNK
AK B5T PT CNN
EXISTING RIGHT OF WV
OR PROPERTY UN[
DWELLING
WIDENING LIMIIS
m
SCALE IN FEEI
0 500
1XIFING RIOHI
O F W
OR PRO
DW HRR LK
EILING I
WINING I.IMIlS
m
KALI IN PEF
0 500
4W&Li-i i
I
LEGEND
EXIFING ROMP
EXISTING RIGHI OF WV
OR PROPERLY LINE
DWELLING
WIDENING LIMITS
rimmim,
SCALE IN FEET
0 500
LIGNI)
EXISTING ROADWAY
EXISTING RIGHT OF WO
OR PROPERTY LINE
OWEIIING
.;� WINNING LIMITS
Mm
FEDERAL OND-GAM[LAOS
HIGH OUALIlY OUTSTANDING
WATER RESOURCES
UWMRRIE NATIONAL FOREST
WETLANDS
STREWS
Mm
II 'I SUE KINK
i'Ilf HST HT 41.GIIIICIi
EXISTING RIGHT OF WV
OR PROPERTY LINE
(J DWELLING
WINNING IIVIIS
IEO[RAI 1-00-NMUNOS
HIGH ORIP HTSIANDNG
WATER RESOURCES
UWHAPRIE NAM% FOREST
WETI-ANOS
STREAMS
I RARE PATS
ME IN I'EF
0 Ko
wu6i'--L A
NORTH 0 WENNG
dN GC I ICI hN` _I
11
HIS11% ROADWAY
EXISTING PIN 01 WAY
OR PROUTY LIN[
HEM
WIDENIN6 JUS
FEDEPk SAND—DIVEIANDS
HIGH OIJAUlY VS7HING
WEP RESOURCES
JDARPIE NA71ONAL FOREST
o WETLANDS
STREAMS
i RAPE I'l—ANIS
SCALE IN ET
0 50
NOUH S MUNK
ANO BEST li AULMEPJ
�
BISTING ROADWAY
EXISTING RICHi Of WAY
\ OR PROEM LINE
�] DWELING
'. WIDENING LIMITS
FEDERAL LAND- GAMELANDS
NIGH OUALITY OUTSTANDING
WATER RESOURCES
UWNARRIE NATIONAL FOREST
�o WETLANDS
STREAMS
SCALE IN FEET
0 500
i
SMTH �D[ WENK'
EXISTING ROAMY
EXISIING RIGNI OF WAY
OR PROPERTY LINE
DWELLING
WIDENING LIMIIS
STREAMS
IIiiF N IfE WUNNG
ANO hf f FIl & MT
c
i i �
OD
I� li �r �� ��
z
W' 'i
W
u
\,1
I
--I- v
EE
BB
� i
o0
c
EE
c c
EE
DSIING ROMP
BISIING RIGHI OF WAY
OR POEM LINE
DWELLING
WIDENING LIMIIS
to
SCALE IN PEEI
0 500
N SC[ WEU,IIai
H BEST f i GJGllld[Ili
ING PIGHI OF W
POPIM LINE
[PAL LAND-GAVF[ANOS
. Ns
[ RANTS
Ilia 1 N[ MONK
W HST AI C �
EM"ING POUP
's
0 500
Wlk�—
II III SH
GII[i KST M AUfi!',III,4
DISIING ROADWAY
BISIING RINT Or W
OR PROP[RIY LIN[
OWELING I
WINNING LIMIIS
3��