20001432 Ver 1_Jurisdictional Determination_20080320

t/3 �
Mr. Gregory W. Price, Natural Environment Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary [
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
March 20, 2008
SUBJECT: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules [15A
NCAC 2H .0506(h)], US 421/NC 87 (Sanford Bypass) from East of NC 42
to NC 87 Near SR 1138, Sanford, Lee County, TIP No. R- 2417C, WBS No.
34431.1.6
Dear Mr. Price:
Polly Lespinasse of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) met with you on March 19, 2008, in order to
provide verification of potential jurisdictional features previously identified for the above referenced
project. These features were evaluated for applicability to the mitigation rules set forth in [15A NCAC
2H .0506(h)]. The maps containing the project corridor were provided in the jurisdictional verification
package received by this office on February 14, 2008. The jurisdictional features are approximated
on these maps.
Most of the jurisdictional features associated with this project have been previously verified by the
agencies. Additional features were identified when the project boundaries were revised. Four (4)
additional features were identified as part of the project boundary revisions. Two (2) of the four sites
were evaluated by DWQ staff:
• Site 10: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for the entire reach and scored 25
points on the DWQ stream classification form. The stream was originally evaluated in August
2007. During the March field visit, water flow was abundant. Due to increased water flow, the
hydrology and biology portions of the stream form were re- evaluated. Based on this evaluation,
the stream scored 33 points. Therefore, the stream at Site 10 will be classified as perennial.
• Site 13: This stream was originally classified as intermittent for the entire reach. Based on the
site visit, this stream will continue to be classified as an intermittent stream within the project
boundaries. Groundwater flow was apparent and stream characteristics were observed for the
length of the reach.
Based on the site reviews of the jurisdictional determinations, DWQ will consider all sites identified in
the jurisdictional verification package and revisions identified above as accurate.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and does not approve any activity
within buffers, Waters of the United States, or Waters of the State. Any impacts to wetlands, streams
and buffers must comply with 4041401 regulations, water supply regulations (15A NCAC 2B .0216),
applicable buffer rules, and any other required federal, state and local regulations. Please be aware
that even if no direct impacts are proposed to any protected buffers, sheet flow of all new stormwater
runoff as per 15A NCAC 2B .0250 is required.
O
None hCaroli na
Vatura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Internet: h2o.enr.stale.nc.us Mooresville, NC 28115
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled /10 %a Post Consumer Paper
Phone[phone]
Fax [phone]

Mr. Gregory W. Price
Page Two
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a
determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the
Director in writing c/o Brian Wrenn, DWQ 401 Transportation Permitting Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650.
Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a
surface water from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory
appeal time does not start until the affected parties (including downstream and adjacent landowners)
are notified of this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be
certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner.
To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C.
27699 -6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information please contact Polly Lespinasse
at (704) 663 -1699.
Sincerely,
Robert B. Krebs
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
cc: Richard Spencer, USACE Wilmington Field Office
Sonia Gregory, DWQ Wetlands Unit
File Copy

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
D��HA£LF.BA8LBY
Uovsxmou � - D
��
February 5,200X
U. S. Arnry Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box I89U
Wilmington, NC28402-l89O
Mr. Richard Spencer
NCIJ(}ICoordinator
Dear Sir:
H[ 11", 1 4 2008
NC Duum ,w|RO
����
u�nn�r�mx��\����s\�!«�<�U�J/��UCq,
SUBJECT: Verification of new and/or modified streams and wetlands associated with the US 421/NC
87 (Sanford from cast ofNC42toNC87 near SBL|l38` near Sanford, NC.
Division 8,WBSNo. 3443l.l.6'T.LP.No. D,2417C.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Natural Environment Unit has co���ed
the debueo1imnof^^VVztoraof the \Jni1cdStatcm,`` for the ah . referenced road project, sites (8ik:o
V,lO,l3` and l4) are shown uu the attached maps. Nn jurisdictional determination (I|umunoa) forms
were completed for sites 13 and 14 due to the sites believed to hc isolated co showing no significant
ucxom.I�o�u\dubec{pvvureGl}ednuttorSite9nd}uudmiooenooheoAuoiotbevvo1amdc'- community were
observed since the original peonit. The wetland boundary for Site 9 appeared tn have changed
warranting u new delineation.
The Natural Environmental Unit would like U) request a jurisdictional determination ofthe stream and
wetland delineations nf the sites with a field vorifivationmeeting preferably scheduled in the February —
April 2008 time period, A draft permit modification for this section of the Sanford Bypass for NCDOT
internal review im due ioApril 2008. The scheduled LET date for this project imAn�l2l,2OO9. p\euxe
see the a� supporting -
I\ Project vicinity maps (draft perod<drawings)
2) NIC8 soil survey mapping
3) L7S[}S topographic and aerial maps depicting site locations
4) 0SACE wetland data forms and approved jurisdictional determination forms Ol��uuoo)
5) Y�CIJnY8 otreunnideu1ifloudonfbrouo ' '
Please contact nzm by nhnoc (919-715-5533) or by ccool with
possible
available dates that you omokd meet. If you have any questions, obeaoo du not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you for your time and cooperation.
rice, Natural Environment Unit
�cc: Ms.Polly Lespinasse, Division nfWater Quality
MAILING ADDRESS: � mommw;
mc DEPARTMENT opTRANSPORTATION nELe,xoxs: 91e715-1500
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL Aw^m*" rmx: 919-715'1501 uroa CAPITAL a,"n SUITE 240
«mu MAIL nsm^sCENTER w�omn�*vmmwroocanm �uoe�'wcu�m4
RALEIGH NC 27699'15e8

vti m-afv
Yr
1i ` _-- ' f G
L7
I..". 0-
6, /3,Z
41,

RE. R2417C
Subject: RE: R2417C
From: "Price, Gregory W " <gwprice @ncdot.gov>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:29 :18 -0500
To: "Polly. [e-mail]" <Polly.Lespinasse @ncmail.net>
Site 2 stream
Site 4 stream
Site 5 stream
requiring no m
Site 6 stream
Site 7 stream
Site 8 stream
Site 11 stream
- perennial
- perennial
- perennial except
itigation)
- perennial
- perennial
- intermittent but
- perennial
for trib at station 19-58 -YRPB (143 feet intermittent
requiring mitigation
- - - -- Original Message - - - --
From: Polly.Lespinasse @ncmail. net [ mailto :Polly.Lespinasse @ncmail.net]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 1:32 PM
To: Price, Gregory W
Subject: R2417C
Greg,
Sorry to continue to be a pain, but I need some additional information on the
jurisdictional calls for this project. When we write our permits and /or modification
we need to include the stream call. The only information I have on the stream calls
are for streams 9, 10, 13 and 14. Could you please send me an e -mail for the stream
calls (intermittent or perennial) for Streams 2 (I think this one is perennial), 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, and 11.
Thanks ".
1 of 1 1/20/2009 8 :59 AM

N
W+E
S
Feet
1 • 1 :1 160 240 320
R-2417C Site 9
Lee Co.

m
f •
Lee Co.

Feet
0 35 70 140 210 280 R -24170 Site 10

Feet
35 70 140 210 280 R- 2417C Site 10
Lee Co.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/ Site: =� �., /� lw4 /
Applicant 1 Owner:
Investigator: G.e ,; T,
of "
Date: 6-10- 0'7
County: 15n:�-
State:
Stratum
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes
(explain on reverse if needed)
-'_-�No
No ✓
No ✓
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION Ajeil',. 1 I - ;'J
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
� ,..
_ Aerial Photographs
_
Other
_ inundated
2.�0. ,.tA hr.. , T
Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
10. r yr ✓ f nv" a ^ ,,
_ !�
F/�C.�
3. r /aw A, St ,ge, f/ur 7r-
FAG
11._�,�,,,',:,�
(in.)
Secondary Indicators:
4. rn� a + _�
F CWt
12.
__._Water- Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: �_(in.)
5 n �• S
FACk/ t
13,
Remarks:
6. i79a£.,r /n ;, >{n,a/FlB_
F,47ZAI --�
14.
��
7.
ii /
• ! ✓;: ✓. - -Q•i �d fit
0BL.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -).
/ J
Remarks: /067 �d��
J
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Primary Indicators:
Other
_ inundated
1,--N-o Recorded Data Available
Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations:
Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water:
-j�rainage Patterns in Wetlands
(in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: fin,}
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
__._Water- Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: �_(in.)
_ Local Soil Survey Data
�cFAC- Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): 'Orr5 6 ;A -1 /01-,/ f,,..,,/DrainageClass:
r
Taxonomy (Subgroup): �A Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No!�
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist) Abundance /Contrast Structure, etc.
/0 rC'
S // LaGn
IL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol
_ Concretions
Histic Epipedon
_ High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime
Listed On Local Hydric Solis List
iListed
Reducing Conditions
on National Hydric Soils List
keyed or Low- Chroma Colors
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Within a Wetland? Yes_L/No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No ___ _

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: /P -aye %[ S,'Je /O a p¢
Applicant/ Owner: WC 0
Investigator: G� ��« %ry, ursrn, s� e �n
Date: 9 -10-0 7
County: L,ee
State: tiG
indicator
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes L----N-o
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ✓
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No
(explain on reverse if needed)
Community ID;
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
indicator
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator
Primary Indicators:
!
FAC
9. Lon;rG /G Q4/7CG,
F*7
2.
Water Marks
10. Pcrf�v o�,'is,s H1Jl�'i
3._f%P, embe m
7°
��G
11. 5.,. I',x ✓a psi f'G
-.F
✓ FAC
4. _(A %mzla G✓n� /:(dnG;
"I""
1AC4c
12, (n/ +'s�p /� %�P.ri +S
V --�
5.
F-`fG ti/
13.
7._ b, 5 a Oat- A s
.5
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -).
Remarks:
GDY„ r1i N11r /°•i�F f, 7
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Primary Indicators:
_ Other
inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available
Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations:
_ Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water:
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
{in.)
Secondary Indicators:.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ?r� (in.)
Oxidized Roots Channels in U Water- Stained Leaves Upper 12"
Depth to Saturated Soil: y ` (in.)
_ Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC- Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):! s �' /ra,� /�,�
_f'; / Drainage Class:
CoA S
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell_Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance[Contrast Structure etc.
0419 .4 /D]'a!' 3 aZ /oil
/n- ref J? /o7e3 .
Goa r�H,/
Hydric Soil indicators:
_ Histosol _
Concretions
Histic Epipedon —High
Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils.
_ Sulfidic Odor _Organic
Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed
On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Deducing Conditions _Listed
Gleyed or Low - Chroma Colors
on National Hydric Soils List
Other
(Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
C�+f�as� GouPCU�p
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes v----No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Is the Sampling Point r�I
Within a Wetland? Yes_ No !�

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name _� -may /%� S• ,1e /Q Nearest Road /VC _
County Zee Wetland area , 0�6_ acres Wetland width feet
Name of evaluator P1,cel. Date
Wetland location
pond or lake
on perennial stream
won intermittent stream
_ within interstream divide
other:
Soil series:
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
_ predominantly mineral - non -sandy
edominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)'
Bottomland hardwood forest
_L�eadwater forest
Swamp forest
Wet flat
_ Pocosin
Bog forest
Adjacent land use
(within 1/i mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
wrested /natural vegetation ,?C7%
rgriculture, urban/suburban /-/0%
,f-impervious surface 30%
Dominant vegetation
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
,,-�intermittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog /fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina bay
Other:
The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R
-
Water storage
-
x 4.00 — -------------------- -----------------------
,� = ��
A
Bank/Shoreline stabilization
x 4.00 =F_7Y1
Wetland
T
Pollutant removal
_� ** x 5.00 =
rating 1.
� _
j
Wildlife habitat
3 x 2.00 =
N
Aquatic life value
x 4.00 =
®_
G
Recreation/Education
1 x 1.00 =
O!
**Add 1
point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint source disturbance within
'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: a Project:
' ,Ie /lJ Latitude:
Evaluator: G„o3 P.ee T,., A,5,,, site: /0 Longitude:
[ .--. I ... . Stream /sat least Intermittent � County: Other
if z 19 or perennial tf 3 30 Pe _ e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 6�
e„ '
0
„_.,:,
d'i`g,{ate;0
,,,, ,.,,,E
��tlrp 9; 1
1`. Continuous bed and bank
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
0
1
().L
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2
3
5. Active /relic floodplain
0
1
Yes
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
("
2
3
7. Braided channel
D
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
`D
1
2
3
9' Natural levees
5P
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; 0131 = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
1
2
11. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
12. Natural valley or drainageway
0
0.5
1 '
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No
Yes = 3
,via, 1-111auv u, +w,oa a, t; uuL iamu, scaa uiz�:unwuns in manual
R. Hvdreiaav ( Suhtotal = 3
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
0
1 1
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or rowin season
.0
1
2
3 "
16. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
D )
().L
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or plies (Wrack lines)
0
D.
1
1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
No = 0
Yes
1
C. Bloloov (Subtotal = �/2 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
2
1
0
21t'. Rooted plants in channel
2
1
0
22. Crayfish
w
0.5
1
1.5
23. Bivalves
1
2
3
24. Fish
!
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
("
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
1
2
3
28. iron oxidizing bacteria /fungus.
(4 )
0.5
1
1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; 0131 = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
scums cu ana c s locus on uie presence or upiano piarns, nem 2a focuses on tree presence of aquatic or watland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this farm for additional notes.)
Sketch:

Feet
0 12.5 25 50 75 100 R-2417C Site 13
Lee Co.

Feet
0 12.5 25 50 75 100 R-2417C Site 13
Lee Co.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification c=orm; Version 3 -1
IDater - Project: �� a7G/f �� Latitude:
Evaluator G Site: �3 Longitude:
'total Points: Other
Stream is at least intermittent ^/ County: e, Quad Name:
ff z i 9 or rennlal if z W . / 9'
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = )
s
0
~
�� u,,t„e�
, , �°
1B. Continuous bed and bank
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity
16. Leaflitter
1
2
3
3. In- channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
p"
1
2
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
0
2
3
5. Activelrelic f]oodplain
0
i
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
dl;
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
(
1
2
3
B. Recent alluvial deposits
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria /fungus.
1
2
3
9' Natural levees
29". Wetland plants in streambed
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
1
2
3
11. Grade controls
0.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
0
1
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = D
Yes = 3
Irma- rnrsae ouanes are MR raMo, see aisoussions In manual
R Hveirnlnnv (Sirhtrital = 19-15- 1
14. Groundwater flow /discharge
0
1
1
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or rowln season
p
1
1
3
16. Leaflitter
1.5
0.5
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
2
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
19. Hydric sails (redoximorphic features) present? I
No = 0
1 Yes 1.5
C. Sininav (Subtotal = 1
20°. Fibrous roots in channel
3
2 )
1
p
21 S. Rooted plants in channel
3
2
1
1 p
22. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Bivalves
s4
1
2
3
24. Fish
f0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
[0:
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
1
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria /fungus.
0
0.5
29". Wetland plants in streambed
FAC = 0.5; FACW !2L7 E OSL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
ucn w cU a+w e- I IUcus Un u Re Presence or up3ana plants, nem za iocuses on the presence of aquatic or wecand plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
II
- E 5 l3 /�JS�/ ✓pPf G I�.» �r . ^fir: �i�'t //E'
Sketch:

M
lop_ -.9
ll:
IF
Site 14
m m �� �� Feet
0 40 80 160 240 320
R -241 7C Site 14

Feet
0 40 80 160 240 320 R- 417C Site 14
Lee Co.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site. Y; -.(° / �% /GN,G,r le;„, Date:
Applicant/ Owner: ✓4v 0 i,27 County: Z'Pe
Investigator: �5,/r,,, 1�'rk� ,�, ��r��z -State: �/�
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes v' No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ✓ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species -Stratum Indicator
1._JN!2 cus 1�psas f-�
fAtGJy-
9.
2• P/, N N M S.c , �- T( H} ___ H
03-4
10.
3.
,---go Recorded Data Available
4. f�Ennf / q„exs, H
FICA/
12.
Drift Lines
Field Observations:
13.
6.
Depth of Surface Water:
14.
7.
15.
13.
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -). 10D7,
Remarks:
v- CI %-1 GA U t NJI
_ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC - Neutral Test
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetiand Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Primary Indicators:
Other
_ Inundated
,---go Recorded Data Available
_Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations:
Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water:
/
/ A
linage Patterns in Wetlands
(in.}
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
/a (in.)
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil:
fo% (in.)
_ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC - Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
r•1F� /G,�,l �rG,/ SW�i,fr,�ir�:
,�, s� %y'�� j�onllE�'�r�%,1,
SOILS

Map Unit Name y�
(Series and Phase): , s bo/ilan IoAjk, s! -,a Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No L­
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
Inches Horizon [Munsell Moiso
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moistl AbundancelControst Structure etc.
D -S /0//-///
Ana`s -.
y
y
T'
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
_ Concretions
Histic Eplpedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
Sulfidic Odor
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime
_Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
dyed or Low - Chroma Colors —Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WE I LAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes k----No

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: ��'� %[ S.'fi /y G.r`,„ �,/�r
Date: qZ1310
Applicant 1 Owner: f bo
Investigator: .!.!6
County:
State:_ zG
9.
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes 1--h-1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ✓
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No
(explain on reverse if needed)
Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. _ /) ;a ;�o.i"
1in fl 511�--
9.
2. - ov': o :
a
10.
3. Se liq
_ inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
12.
_�Y F 4LG1
13.
6•
-f
14.
7.
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -). U
Remarks:
/ 1
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
_ l (in.)
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water- Stained Leaves
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Primary Indicators:
Other
_ inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
V/ No Recorded Data Available
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations:
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water:
—11114 (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
_ l (in.)
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water- Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil:
�� (in.)
Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC - Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):_l%',00al is �offin„
4,,,,, xanbra1nage Class:_
Da
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No V�
Profile Descri Lion:
Depth Matrix Coors Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) _ (Munsell Moist) Abundance]Contrast Structure etc.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
_ Concretions
— Histic Epipedon
_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor ---_--_Organic
Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime
_Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions
_Listed on )National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low- Chroma Colors
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
f
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes_ No 4,�
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:

I WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name .5 ;,ie Nearest Road _ G!S 41o2/
County Lee Wetland area Z ./ acres Wetland width 10-15 feet
Name of evaluator f?,e
Wetland location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
nether:
Soil series:
predominantly organic - humus, muck, or
peat
dominantly mineral - non -sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width > 100 feet
Wetland type (select one)`
Bottomland hardwood forest
Headwater forest
Swamp forest
_ Wet flat
_ Pocosin
Bog forest
Date
Adjacent land use
(within '/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
forested /natural vegetation %
—agriculture, urban/suburban ,gyp %
_L�pervious surface _4g�p %
Dominant vegetation
(1) .Jr..�cus PrLr145 �[ /
(2) ` ° %gOi7l�� Stigi % /GTlfvyy
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently flooded or
inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
nnittently flooded or temporary surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Pine savanna
Freshwater marsh
Bog /fen
Ephemeral wetland
Carolina bay
Other:
µ The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
R Water storage J x 4.00 = q
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 = Wetland
T Pollutant removal x 5 AO = rating
** 0 _
1 Wildlife habitat x 2.00 = 1 —01
N Aquatic life value / x 4.00= 0 `
G Recreation/Education '- x 1.00 =
** Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and X10% nonpoint source disturbance within ' /z mile upstream, upslope, or radius

�uESrEeO �, I `
a
/ E
/
101 ROILilON �LBERi w011�E ESi,
IEE DEJIJI EO \
cl9Y I14 1NI
Rol 1
'� 6rtECV1 M DDGI 11 I I E
!� DVAl IE
I
I Illtul oIICN , �
MECUM DCH I I 6EE rAI n S /
91 DEEAl9f � ��E� I EIN✓ll CU1 DiCN I C
1 tIE XruwE �
\ IIII EGI ��
1 IIII
J�
� �II
I f�` IIII
I�� III
j
f IIII
j
� Ili
I lii�
it
II I I i
I I II�
I � III
II I
I�, III I
k� III I, I
I IIII
IIII
III I
m
1
I�
E
a
i
u
k
MIND
FIR '
EASE N1,
91 Di1Al IP HIM
W2 lum
NOT AJUAVIVONAl
sI
,1
w,�wASOIJ JR, 11 ,II � 1 3Q ' II r�
II \ \\ , Al8Ep1 w4JJBlE ESi, 1
I \
v
I I
I
eJ I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
1 d
1
1 I
1�
1�
A
11 Oul11
EIOR• N8 v
Ift�DDp1 MAVAN
CUTE INI 10.910
Nla lac.pry
\C j
\ NED1�1 DU1 DDCH
\6EEDE1AlJ
I
NIDJIC'I RWlNcl NO.
IHIV NO,
R -911c
B
w IS NO.
WY DRION
INDINal
PREVEN
DO NOT U2 Po
N1 WU4
1011
RY PLANS
WN9TNVCPgN
\C j
\ NED1�1 DU1 DDCH
\6EEDE1AlJ
I

� f�d
1 n 1
f II I
I r a r* Y I
ml
7 f�
NA
1 I ,II
:nl ( ;
z

4,1
;JA
4"
ki, Mi
lip,I
fN
"ll
I
�J
,
....... . . ...... .. .
r;V"
Ti
I
eq!j
q.4
0 Oil
�"iF. fj l,'� 'k,.,
N"'47, 6�
AN 17 . ... .. 11