20071102 Ver 1_Application_20070625

«• STNt o
O ~' ~
'~
.q~~
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
`'~ ` f ~,'~~ "r,
~~/~ 1:..
f
/~ ~ ' r,
rP,r~" /l/ ~' r
';:i:
.,~,(~:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DNISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
June 18, 2007
Mr. John Hennessy
401/Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1650
X71102
SUBJECT: Embankment Stabilization, SR 1113 (Reepsville Road), Lincoln County
Dear Mr. Hennessy:
The North Carolina Deparhnent of Transportation proposes to stabilize the road/stream embankment at a
culvert on SR 1113 in Lincoln County. The embankment around the outlet headwall will be stabilized by
the construction of a 10-foot rock "retaining wall". The rock will be aligned with the existing edge of
stream and the culvert wingwall and will not narrow the existing channel dimension. A 20-foot
temporary linear cofferdam will be used to isolate the work area from the bank stabilization project. The
scope of the work will result in a total of 10 linear feet of permanent impacts to an unnamed tributary to
Tanyard Creek, which is classified as Class C waters by the Division of Water Quality.
SR 1113 is not a rural or urban arterial and the project is not located within '/2 mile of the critical
watershed area; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill basin
checklist.
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for historical sites and threatened/
endangered species sites. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places are located in the
vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. The federally listed species for
Lincoln County (USFWS listed dated March 8, 2006) include Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii) and the
dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nan~ora). Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest
Michaux's sumac location approximately 25 miles southeast (in Mecklenburg County) of the proposed
project area. There are no known sites of Michaux's sumac in Lincoln County. The sumac is typically
found in sandy or rocky, open woods and appears to survive best in areas with some disturbance, such as
artificially or naturally maintained clearings. Michaux's sumac was not observed in the project area.
Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest dwarf-flowered heartleaf location approximately
0.6 miles north of the proposed project area. The heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes
(usually north facing and of the oak-hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy areas near springheads. There
is no suitable habitat within the proposed project area and no species were observed. NCDOT is
recommending a finding of "no effect" for T&E species and historical structures.
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY

SR 1113
Page 2
June 18, 2007
I have enclosed apre-construction notification for a Water Quality Certification #3626 (NW#13),
sketches of planned activities, and location maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150463-55120005-12B.105511-4671
• TIP #: NA
• Project Category: $200.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank you for
your time and consideration to this matter
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division

Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
Cc: Polly Lespinasse, DWQ, Mooresville Regional Office
Ron Linville, Wildlife Resources Commission (Courtesy Copy)

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 ~ ~ 7 1 1 n~
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW#13 (WQC#3626)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Holder N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9020 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Trish Simon
Company Affiliation: N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address: tsimon(a~dot.state.nc.us
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Embankment Stabilization, Reegsville Road (SR 1113)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 12B.105511
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Lincoln Nearest Town: Lincolnton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Lincolnton, west on
Hwy 27, right on North Grove Street (becomes SR 1008, Reepsville Road), at Killian Road
intersection, Reepsville Road road number changes to SR 1113. Site is located at the
intersection of SR 1113 and SR 1205 (Seagletown Road).
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°30'44"°N 81°20'25"°W
6. Property size (acres): < 0.10 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed tributa~ to Tanyard Creek, Class C
Waters (from source to Howards Creek).
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing Conditions-culvert on paved secondary road.
General Land Use- agricultural.
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used. Lar eg rock
will be utilized to stabilize bank and to rebuild the road embankment. Typical heave
equipment trackhoe backhoe etc) will be used for the construction of this proiect.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to repair
an eroding road embankment for the safety of the traveling_public.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticpated at this site.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Minor impacts from embankment
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Page 3 of 8

Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no (linear feet

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
mutt he included_ Tn calculate acreage_ multiply length X width. then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number
(indicate on
Stream Name
Type of Impact or
Intermittent Stream Width
Before
Length
Impact
(linear feet) (acres)
ma
?
Im act
1 UT to Rock "retaining wall" perennial 10 feet 10 feet .0022
Tanyard Creek for stabilization
1 Temporary Linear 20 feet .0046
Cofferdams
* 10 feet *.0022 acre
permanent permanent
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 20 feet .0046 acre
*Permanent impacts contained within area of temporary impacts temporary temporary
impacts to impacts to
open channel open channel
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation_ rireduinu_ flnndinu_ drainage_ hulkheads_ etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc. (acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): Permanent .0022
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) Permanent .0022
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 10 feet
Page 4 of 8

7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
NA
8. Pond Creation NO POND IMPACTS
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, imgation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts..The eroding embankment is
threatening the structural integrity of the culvert. The embankment must be stabilized for the
safety of the traveling public. A rock "retaining wall" will be constructed for the embankment
stabilization. The rock will be aligned with the existingedge of stream and the culvert wingwall
and will not narrow the existing channel dimensions.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
Page 5 of 8

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multi Tier Required
lnm,n.u ~ url P A/~ifi rt~4inn
1 I I 3 (2 for Catawba)
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
No increase in impervious surface is proposed.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater is generated from the project.
Page 7 of 8

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The embankment stabilization will not result in additional development of the surrounding area.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

Embankment Stabilization, SR 1113,
Reepsville Road, Lincoln County
Eroding Bank at Culvert Wingwall

n

Shot Rock to be Stacked -~
to Retain Backftlled Material
Areo to be Bockfilled
Concrete Jersey Barrier
~ Existing Headwall
~- Existing Culvert
I I
I
REEPSVILLE ROAD
..- SR 1113
To Seogletown Rd
PLAN VIEW
SCALE I'=20'
SR 1113
Shot Rock Stocked
Areo to be Bockfilled Approximate Water Surface
CROSS SECTION 'A'
SCALE r=ZO'
NOTES:
Any contaminated water within the construction
site Ts to be Dumped into o slit bop
Upon completion of the pro)ect all silt fences ore
to be placed os needed. Also seeding and mulching
of disturbed areas
A temporary coffer dam of concrete Jersey barriers NCDOT DIV 12
along with Bond bops wtllbe used to divert the stream flow. I Bridge Maintenance
Lincoln County
Bank Stabilization ~ Non
NBIS Structure 542279
0' S' 10' 20' 30'
Unnamed Tributary to
Tonyord Creek

Z ~- _, a -_ 6 r• c ~ T uwc c 1
~ ;' ~ ~ ~ _°~° _ ~. ~' O
'~.
~ . f ~ , ~ , '` ~~ ~~' ~( ~1 ~ ~ I
\J I ~ _ ~, ---~-~-
t _J ~ h ~ ~ .. ~ L i
F I ' ~-~1 y~ i~~ ~.r . I ~~ ~ r" b fCl .o wsrOw.-+-
-r-- ; ~ ~-r- ~ i
;.~ , q
b ~'
~ ~~ ~ ~_i-~-` ~`_ 1 - ~~~ ~ i,'`~r 1~ o
I __ ~ B ~ ~ ~
L ~ ~; 9
~ .- v>-~ i
oa ~ z ~-~ .~~ ~i ~
I-~-= ~,
3 ~~ ~ __-~. ~" _ '~ ~
¢-~ - -
~ Q .,, f NI ~I~ rI ~ I"~_ra I ~_ L~°~ al _~ ~I ,~~'~,
ra..° \ ~ _
~~:
02~ _ ti `.r ~ c
~,I
~ „ ~ - - _ t_ `o a c
~~. ~ - '4~
~~ ,-~I (' ~-r~ _~ c ~
~I H ~~°~ ° H "I ~ N'i ~ °, WI °I "~I °_ I . ~ u of ~ r ° ~I ~~~ e~ ~ ~
.~ ,~- ar
~Vr mh ~~ _: -I
s~.~a m~ s ~.~ - ~ ~ .F _ ~ I a I _I,
i o
~~
mr . off: "~ ~~ ' _~ - i ° ~ ' "~ ° ml =~ ~ ~/ ~~° =j ~``_~ ~ ~ j
~, ~~
u a.° i,
°f -~ - ~ =1 ~ .A
P- y
~+k,. c~ ~~ °'I =I - ~ 1 ~Ir~l` .I °iI NI 1 i .~5~ ~i
o ' - !!4
;off ° .~ ' ~,~1 .-~I ~~ ..~ _ .~= , - - o
NO1NYDbOn 01 i P % p ~ _ _ m
~2
sl. ~ '`~c o 4 a ~ d ~
ion'- _z Yr - - ~8~34501_ O _`
' ° ~ 0`
~ti~ o N n o
o~ = off- ~
y
w T-

I r ref _ . - ` i 'y ~ ,,r ~, ,•° ~ ~_ + E ~ _ -. _ ~ ,,. i ~
i rr ~''~ r ~ v r r ~ 155«., ' f ~;+ ~'' `\;, ~ I
;_
~:
I
~ y
y _-.
Y{ jjjj~~ ~/y ,+ •jIS ~ +
1 1 E
' .r - -- 's+ S~
r ~.. .~---~. k ~ ,; y
s ~ `5`,ti
~ `555 __ i •'k~ "_ l'~'S' ~^ tea. l'.
},, `",:,_~:` _ - f ~' ~,,, 554 ~ ,f• ~ a i '
r
,,
~ -_. -• -
r_
~ti~ -' '~,~~ •5 r~ .i ~4
''\
,y ~S ~ Y~ ,7 y ~ti fin,, y ~~ I J ~ 1 ~ ~ + ~ 1
s '1 ~~_'~ '~ 55 , 5 y
~ ~ ~.~' ~ ( ~ ) ~ I ~ ~ f~'
~-.
.```r 5 f 'y5 w, 5461 ~ .'1 , ~ 1 ~ .
'•. , ,~ ~ .~ titi i , ~ .
,~ •. _, `
5 5 ..M/ 1 5 ~ .. _ ~ ,1
. FFF
__ ., ~ ._~
~ -h~k 5~ ~ .. / ^" ..~'~.•' •~,` 55 5 155a 4 !:~ , ,r! r ~ ~ * ..
f ,(
' i ~` ' ~ ,~
4 •.
4 " ~ ~ I I t. 5 1 ant
/ ,~ _
7 ~ ~ ,
'~
Is • I ~ ~~,
` - 'Bank ' '';, ~ - • ~ ~ ~ '- ~ ~ ' ~`
Stabilization 1~~~5;~~y .1 `:- _ _ .~-:.~..•~ _ r ~r~ 5
r
•
.,
,~
.,
.5 .u
~? {
f'~ 7_n~ '~~~ f
'+1,,,4 `i Y'V I ~1 ~_~-~,. r. wJr`'r„ ~ fe { ~ft~~ ~~••,,~``,.~5 yy \.~.
J ! k
r.
-.y.. •' .='a'=!"~''Y, ~+Cr s.. . , _.• ~ ,/ ~{i.s ~r„+ r {,rr „t _ '' x 5; ; 't -_..
~!"
Y~Oi7C+a W' *, ' . ~ . ~l '~' • ~1'~~ R_/r~° ~~V ..:}~ L„ _~T ~ I ~ .'~ / ' +~J}JJ{ _+~ ~... \5. '~ 1;`y5 • ,_ ~ ~:
l`~i_ r 1
•`5
' h
k
~' .. si ~'~i - . { •~' ~ fit.,'- ~ f+,J ~ ~,`. ~I
~,~^ -^ti ~
~ ~ ._ - ~ ~ ~ 'S ,/may _
.T~y~fJ ~'~-...~J - - ~4 Lam, :'t • ~ _ !' ~ i y 1 ~a y~'' f
__ r~~
1 ~ ,,~. / z h
~ J
} r.. ` ~ h ,1 5,
9
- ~"" ~ 4 ; ~ ~ 55
e _ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~ y~''ti qy` ~~ r' t ~ ,1 ~ r.r. ~ ~ -~~.. ~ - k y~ ~ `'tq W r
' _.. it .- 5
P i
.~ ~ 1 ~ r - ti..~
• _ ,
Name: REEPSVILLE Location: 035° 30' 53.79" N 081° 20' 24.50" W
Date: 6/18/2007 Caption: Bank Stabilization on SR 1113 (Reepsvilte Road), UT to Tanyard
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Creek, Class C Waters, Catawba River Basin

1
~; o
a ~o ~ ~=
~

:
:
:;~;~
Z
: o
:
: W
s
'i'::~. ~i::ii::i
Z o
~ _ v
A - m
W
::;::N':::::;:: r ~
c ~ N
C
N C coo ~~ ; o n
v L $
k ~ t
~
O < ~E o j
Z~ c~
o ~+
`^ a c Z
~
s a o a
~ ie
a
C
C N W C C ~ C ~ r W iw C~ ~~ N $
w ~ W O 1V
e
~ €
O C 8 r Y $~ ~ J >
= Z as '€ e $ £ cw
w
C F W N
g< O ~ E a ~~ ~E ,
v
c a g w a o 2° z
W ~ o= G O O•-y .
v w w O
r
~
< Z
< ~ E $S
<C < < < w C S ~ c
~ O '~ ; Y ~
~'
v J
d wo ~~E o
~

7(
W ~ E S
.w. t w p Y

W < ii O >
G
N
v ~ ~ : R ~ .

';1
~.

NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: l ~ County: T.in~nln Project ID:
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: Embankment Stabilization
Route: SR 1113 ~Reepsville Road) Stream: Unnamed tributary to
Tanyard Creek, Class C Watersh
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r r
ORW r r
WSI r ~
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area ~ r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Arterial Urban
Arterial Rural
Additional Site Information:
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
~ r
r ~
Yes No
r- r
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).