Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG550655_wasteload allocation_19921221,tf 5So 6 SS PERMIT NO.: NC0057631- PERMITTEE NAME: FACILITY NAME: Facility Status: Existing NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION Laurel Creek Mobile Home Park Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: i16691MGD .000 9 Domestic (% of Flow): 100 % Industrial (% of Flow): Comments: l Goo RECEIVING STREAM: Laurel Creek Class: C Sub -Basin: 03-08-31 Reference USGS Quad: E12NW County: Burke Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office (please attach) Previous Exp. Date: 2/28/93 Treatment Plant Class: Classification changes within three miles: Requested by: Susan Robson Date: 9/23/92 Prepared byo 11�5 Reviewed t$' C L11 x 4-6) o (35 Date: /•Z if 77, Date:�ot 9y I Modeler Date Rec. # 1 �MAj q/2-6'1 7(17 Drainage Area (mi ) IS Avg. Streamflow (cfs): �3 7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) z 30Q2 (cfs) l- L Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic Instream Monitoring: Parameters Upstream Location - Downstream _ Location Effluent Characteristics BOD5 (mg/1) NH3-N (mg/1) D.O. (mg/1) TSS (mg/1) F. Col. (/100 ml) pH (SU) Summer 30 h/' 30 by Winter Comments: /c 02-/ Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Laurel Creek Mobile Home Park NC0057631 Domestic - 100% Existing Renewal Laurel Creek C wo 3 01683s Burke Asheville Robson 9/24/92 E12NW Request # 7117 NO. 161992 WATER QUALITY SECTION ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE Stream Characteristic: USGS # Date: Drainage Area (mi2): Summer 7Q10 (cfs): Winter 7Q10 (cfs): Average Flow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs): IWC (%): 2.85 0.8 1.2 4.3 1.6 0.17 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Facility requesting renewal of existing NPDES permit. Tech Support recommends renewal of existing limits. _—'1........o ����,,.�,..� yam"...... y......�....�......La a%..,.,.a.,... a,.c.� �uoa.-cam) ....�...., inetisate-facil ty in 0-30835. . c j✓:; Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: cl _ Same-nete&- Recommended by.. Reviewed by ( Instream Assessment: Regional S Permits & i• m;iff g neerin : � g Date:_ 10/29/92 Date: so RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: Date: DEC 1 1 1992 2 CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Existing Limits: Monthly Average Summer Winter Wasteflow (MGD): ,000f BOD5 (mg/1): 30 NH3N (mg/1): monitor DO (mg/1): nr TSS (mg/1): 30 Fecal Col. (/100 ml): nr pH (SU): 6-9 Residual Chlorine (14/1): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/I): Recommended Limits: Monthly Average Summer Winter WQ or EL Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): 30 EL NH3N (mg/1): monitor DO (mg/1): nr TSS (mg/1): 30 Fecal Col. (/100 ml): nr pH (SU): 6-9 Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures New facility information Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. OR X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. 3 MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Adequacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes No If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? Special Instructions or Conditions Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) — — (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. Nef ,(1 t ot,te, %$,tt 3" GrD/447 ,i5e +7 ,ze It A`"." ,I n 7 1 Ae04,'r *." • ‘7.7 /aJ £'I /tiI° Jl/ cett/c 0301j f" 141-- /ter(A.77-,6 //fiPCit..?: ..<;P.T- 7r4i,„ 4 tc. A4074,. ,ct -1/ u Acce4,414. 27).ti-41, tux, s /. ss� f 41 c' , oa/ f . 0 6o/7 yr /00 �6 / //, c'/ /44,4 "41444 0,/7% 6,0D too.e. iffy. ,d0Ij4C. � 4f— .1-6,4,g__ d 000 9 '(l 420 "IY laurel creek mhp CHLORINE ANALYSIS 7Q10: 0.8000 cfs CL2 Effl. Conc: 0.0000 mg/1 AL (17/19 ug/1): 17.0000 ug/1 Upstream CL2 Conc.: 0.0000 ug/1 Design Flow: 0.0009 MGD Predicted CL2 Downstream: 0.00 ug/1 0 mg/1 CL2 Limit: 9766.103 ug/1 9.766103 mg/1 TO:, PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT WATER QUALITY SECTION DATE: September 28, 192 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATI COUNTY Burke PERMIT NUMBER NC0057631 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION OCT TEctii 1. S; fi U E BRANC-3 1. Facility and Address: Laurel Creek Mobile Home Park Post Office Box 2509 Morganton, N. C. 28680 2. Date of Investigation: December 4, 1991 3. Report Prepared By: James R. Reid 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: David L. Baird 704-437-9564 5. Directions to Site: From the Highway 18 exit off I-40 at Morganton, NC, travel South on Highway 18 approximately 4.2 miles to the mobile home park which is on the right side of Highway 18. There is no sign to identify the facility. 6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points: Latitude: 35° 41' 15" Longitude: 81° 36' 12" Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map. U.S.G.S. Quad No. U.S.G.S. Quad Name Valdese, NC 7. Size (land available for expansion and. upgrading): Unknown. 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Flat, adjacent to or in flood. 9. Location of nearest dwelling: Approximately 50 feet. Page 1 10.. Receiving stream or affected surfacA waters: Laurel Creek a. Classification: C b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: CTB 0308 c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Small, clear mountain stream used for recreation, wildlife support, and agricultural support. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. Type of wastewater: 100 % Domestic % Industrial a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.0009 MGD (Design Capacity) b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:N/A c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A in development should be required approved. not needed 2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in pounds per day: a. Highest month in the past 12 months: lbs/day b. Highest year in the past 5 years: lbs/day 3. Description of industrial process (for industries only) and applicable CFR Part and Subpart: 4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): Existing, septic tank followed by subsurface sandfilter. 5. Sludge handling and disposal schemA: Septage hauler. 6. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): 7. SIC Codes(s): 4952 Wastewater Code(s): Primary 08 Secondary Main Treatment Unit Code: 44007 Page 2 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant funds (municipals only)? 2. Special monitoring requests: 3. Additional effluent limits requests: 4. Other: PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Renew permit. ( — X_ Signature of Report Preparer Water_ Quality Regional Supervisor / Dat J(J Page 3