HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG550655_wasteload allocation_19921221,tf 5So 6 SS
PERMIT NO.: NC0057631-
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Facility Status: Existing
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Laurel Creek Mobile Home Park
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: i16691MGD .000 9
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
l Goo
RECEIVING STREAM: Laurel Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-08-31
Reference USGS Quad: E12NW
County: Burke
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
(please attach)
Previous Exp. Date: 2/28/93 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by:
Susan Robson Date: 9/23/92
Prepared byo 11�5
Reviewed t$' C L11 x 4-6) o
(35
Date: /•Z if 77,
Date:�ot
9y
I Modeler Date Rec.
#
1
�MAj q/2-6'1
7(17
Drainage Area (mi ) IS Avg. Streamflow (cfs): �3
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) z 30Q2 (cfs) l- L
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location -
Downstream _ Location
Effluent
Characteristics
BOD5 (mg/1)
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
Summer
30
h/'
30
by
Winter
Comments:
/c
02-/
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Laurel Creek Mobile Home Park
NC0057631
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Laurel Creek
C
wo 3 01683s
Burke
Asheville
Robson
9/24/92
E12NW
Request # 7117
NO. 161992
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
2.85
0.8
1.2
4.3
1.6
0.17
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of existing NPDES permit. Tech Support recommends renewal of
existing limits.
_—'1........o ����,,.�,..� yam"...... y......�....�......La a%..,.,.a.,... a,.c.� �uoa.-cam) ....�....,
inetisate-facil ty in 0-30835. . c j✓:;
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
cl _ Same-nete&-
Recommended by..
Reviewed by (
Instream Assessment:
Regional S
Permits &
i• m;iff
g neerin :
� g
Date:_ 10/29/92
Date:
so
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
Date:
DEC 1 1 1992
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): ,000f
BOD5 (mg/1): 30
NH3N (mg/1): monitor
DO (mg/1): nr
TSS (mg/1): 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): nr
pH (SU): 6-9
Residual Chlorine (14/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/I):
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1): 30 EL
NH3N (mg/1): monitor
DO (mg/1): nr
TSS (mg/1): 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): nr
pH (SU): 6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
3
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) — — (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
Nef
,(1 t
ot,te,
%$,tt 3" GrD/447
,i5e +7 ,ze
It A`"." ,I n 7 1
Ae04,'r *." • ‘7.7
/aJ £'I /tiI°
Jl/ cett/c
0301j f"
141-- /ter(A.77-,6 //fiPCit..?: ..<;P.T-
7r4i,„ 4 tc. A4074,. ,ct -1/ u Acce4,414. 27).ti-41,
tux, s /. ss� f 41 c' , oa/ f .
0 6o/7 yr /00
�6 / //, c'/ /44,4
"41444
0,/7%
6,0D too.e. iffy.
,d0Ij4C. �
4f— .1-6,4,g__
d
000 9 '(l 420
"IY
laurel creek mhp
CHLORINE ANALYSIS
7Q10: 0.8000 cfs
CL2 Effl. Conc: 0.0000 mg/1
AL (17/19 ug/1): 17.0000 ug/1
Upstream CL2 Conc.: 0.0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0.0009 MGD
Predicted CL2 Downstream: 0.00 ug/1
0 mg/1
CL2 Limit: 9766.103 ug/1
9.766103 mg/1
TO:, PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
DATE: September 28, 192
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATI
COUNTY Burke
PERMIT NUMBER NC0057631
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
OCT
TEctii 1. S; fi U E BRANC-3
1. Facility and Address: Laurel Creek Mobile Home Park
Post Office Box 2509
Morganton, N. C. 28680
2. Date of Investigation: December 4, 1991
3. Report Prepared By: James R. Reid
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: David L. Baird
704-437-9564
5. Directions to Site: From the Highway 18 exit off I-40 at
Morganton, NC, travel South on Highway 18 approximately 4.2 miles
to the mobile home park which is on the right side of Highway 18.
There is no sign to identify the facility.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35° 41' 15"
Longitude: 81° 36' 12"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. U.S.G.S. Quad Name Valdese, NC
7. Size (land available for expansion and. upgrading): Unknown.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Flat, adjacent
to or in flood.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Approximately 50 feet.
Page 1
10.. Receiving stream or affected surfacA waters: Laurel Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: CTB 0308
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream
uses: Small, clear mountain stream used for recreation,
wildlife support, and agricultural support.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater: 100 % Domestic
% Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.0009
MGD (Design Capacity)
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:N/A
c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater:
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
in development
should be required
approved.
not needed
2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in pounds per day:
a. Highest month in the past 12 months: lbs/day
b. Highest year in the past 5 years: lbs/day
3. Description of industrial process (for industries only) and
applicable CFR Part and Subpart:
4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or existing):
Existing, septic tank followed by subsurface sandfilter.
5. Sludge handling and disposal schemA: Septage hauler.
6. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet):
7. SIC Codes(s): 4952
Wastewater Code(s): Primary 08 Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: 44007
Page 2
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant funds
(municipals only)?
2. Special monitoring requests:
3. Additional effluent limits requests:
4. Other:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Renew permit.
( — X_
Signature of Report Preparer
Water_ Quality Regional Supervisor
/
Dat
J(J
Page 3