20071098 Ver 1_401 Application_20070607

N•
•••: BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
:W Et
308ll W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
••• Telephone [phone] -Fax [phone]
s• ° 7 ' ' f~Y?~
~Nr
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL RECEIVED
To: Mr. Jamie Shern Date: June 21, 2007
US Army Corps of Engineers Project #: 60004
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 RE: Silver Creek Subdivision
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
We are sending the following items attached to this transmittal:
Co ies Date Descri tion
1 6/21/07 PCN a lication
f~~~ p
Remarks:
JUN 2 2 2007
UENR -WATER 4UALITY
1~TlAND8 A,'40 STOltA11MATER BRANCH
Signed: Jennifer Burdette c: Mr. Ian McMillan - NCDWQ c~ con;es + $ zoo ~ne~k~
Mr. Trenton Stewart -Arcadia Consulting End

vi0l~~ 0 7 1 0 9 8
Office Use Only' Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to tins project, grease en~er i~~~ riYFu~avic ~~ ~.~n .~
I. Processing
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ D
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUN 2 2 2007
Name: Jones Landing Inc .,.~~;~~~
Mailing Address: 165 Sommerville Park Road M(~TLANDS a'~D STO!t41WATER BRANCH
Raleigh North Carolina 27603
Attn• Percy Johnson
Telephone Number: 919/772-2987 Fax Number: 919/772-5640
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer A. Burdette
Company Affiliation: Burdette Land Consulting Inc.
Mailing Address: 308D W Millbrook Road. Suite 200
Raleigh North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919/841-9977 Fax Number: 919/841-9909
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Silver Creek Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1607-36-9525
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Fuq_uay-Varina
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Silver Creek
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located on the
west side of Mal Weathers Road (SR 2738) approximately 2000 feet south of this road's
intersection with Pawn Road east of Fuq_uay-Varina Wake County North Carolina. Figure
1 depicts the location of the property on US Geological Survey (USGS) Angier, NC 7.5-
minute quadrangle topographic maps
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.6082011 °N 78.6488343 °W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Little Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site currently contains fallow agricultural fields while
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9

farms and residential subdivisions characterize the general land use in the vicinity of the
pro,~ect
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project involves construction of access roads one of which crosses the dam of pond that was
recently drained Heav~quipment typical of rg_ading_and road construction will be used to
complete the project
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to provide access
for the devel~ment of lots for single family homes
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Burdette Land Consulting Inc. (BLC) first conducted a buffer
evaluation of the pond present on the property in January 2006. We found the pond to be
buffered based on the presence of a perennial stream channel below the pond dam. In order to
minimize the impact of the buffered pond to the property and impacts associated with a road
crossing to access the back portion of the property the applicant decided to align the main access
road across the pond dam Since NCDOT will not accept roads located on dams the applicant
decided to drain the pond in order to use the dam for the road crossing and allow the riparian
buffer to re-establish along_the stream channel that re-forms through the pond area. BLC advised
the applicant through the project engineer Trenton Stewart of Arcadia En~ineerin~, to pump the
pond down first to place fill material removed from the dam on high ground, and place a
tem~orar~ culvert the width of the dam until permits for the subdivision were obtained.
However the applicant misunderstood and installed a permanent culvert for the road crossing.
BLC delineated the wetland that formed in the bottom of the former pond on June 12, 2007 and
located jurisdictional wetland area filled during installation of the culvert. Upland and wetland
data forms and Figure 2 are attached in support of the wetland delineation. Figure 2 provides the
location of the site on the applicable Wake County Soil Survey map. BLC's wetland delineation
has not yet been verified by the USAGE Please contact us as soon as possible if a field meeting
is necessary to verify the delineation
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Future permit requests are not anticipated for this project
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts consist
of a partially completed road crossing on the dam of a drained pond. Although the culvert
and rip rah for the road crossing_occu~y 112 linear feet of stream channel, 72 linear feet of
this had already by impacted bathe pond dam. Installation of the culvert resulted in 0.044
acre of impacts to the wetland within the former fond bottom.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
cnr~arataly tict imnartc r1nP to tenth Ctl'I1Ct11rP. All (1 f~(l(1(llil~_
Wetland Im act
p
Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 fill herbaceous no 0 0.044

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number- Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
1 UT to Little Creek culvert/rip rap perennial 4 112 0.010
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 112 0.010
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
x:11 ,nt:l... rtrArlninrr flnnrlina rlrainaaP. hnikhearlc. etc_
Open Water Impact

Site Number
Name of Waterbody
T e of Im act
yp p Type of Waterbody
lake, ond, estuar ,sound, ba
( p y y Area of
Im act
p
(indicate on ma) (if applicable) ocean, etc.) (acres)

NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin from the ro~ect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.010
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.044
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.054
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 112
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., darn embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The project engineer designed
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9

areas of men space around stream channels and wetlands on the property to avoid impacts to
these features where possible The former pond and its associated stream channel bisect the
propert~makin~ the proposed road crossing necessary to access the back portion of the property.
As described earlier the road was located on the pond dam to minimize impacts to the stream
channel Due to several feet difference in elevation between the former pond bottom and the
perennial stream channel located at the base of the dam creating a slope that is much greater than
2°Io the culvert pipe was not buried to avoid headcutting of the newly forming stream channel in
the pond bottom
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state. nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Since the applicant avoided and minimized impacts to stream channels and wetlands to
the maximum extent practicable and the proposed stream channel (112 LF) and wetland
(0 044 AC) impacts are less than the 150 linear foot stream channel and 0.10 acre wetland
thresholds for mitigation utilized by NCDWQ and the USAGE in most cases, BLC believes
that stream channel and wetland mitigation should not be required.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
Updated 11 / 1 /2005
Page 7 of 9

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 6,565 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 3,196 1.5 NA
Total 9,761 NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Since the proposed road crossing_impacts
less than 1/3 acre of riparian buffer and 150 linear feet of stream channel, BLC believes that
buffer mitigation should not be rewired
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The site does not currently contain impervious
acreage Due to the large lot size required for on-site wastewater disposal, the percent
impervious surface is not expected to exceed 20°Io. Maintenance of riparian buffers is expected
protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (port-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated from the~roposed project will be disposed of through individual, on-site
septic systems approved by Wake County
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ^
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ® No ^
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
proposed infrastructure serves only the proposed residential subdivision; therefore, it is not
anticipated to result in additional development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

App an Agen Signature ~ Date
(Agent's signature is v id only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

,, -
_. ,
,, o
~ e` .,
<< _. ~- - _
~~ecfi ~,
1; ~ ~
', « ~i -, -- ~ ~~. ' ~ w 3 ~1 `, ... ~ ~~ ~
i ^(
- _ - _
)4 ~ S / ~ ~
..,, ( t ~,
e,
C~ ~. "
:~
.~~ / ~Z111 ~ \_
•. ,
..,- ..
'~/)
,,
.~ ~ , (` ` ~ l~ r ~i' ( ,J ~ .mil ~! ~ ~~.
~~,,. ~ ~, ~ ~, - ` ..~1 ~ a
r
. , r,- m~'~ ~ ,
~ c ~,
~~(
~ ~ .. ~
.- - - -
~ ~`. /r~d f ii l / -
~ ~ ~ ,
y~ v l
"`-/, ~ ,
,,
r '. ~. '
j was 'l 1 • 11>> ~ -. i . ~~
f ~ ~ r~
l ~ / ~ ~ ~
l` ` t ~ ~,~
~, ; , .-
~ _
r' ~
~~ y 1 1
1
~_
~. o _ ,.
~ ~, ~ • ° - ,
~ ,
,4 ..
.-
' _
[, ..w ~' .. ' ,
- ,'
~... ~ -
/ _ ~. "
~ ~,
[[ l
ti.
r ~ ~ (~.~
11 Y ,.. y `,. t r ~~ -.. ,a-~ a:* ~..,- ..
! '`-~, ~ 5 tt ' ~ y
1 _:.
~ . ;_ i, ~.~ ~ w_
~ i 1 t i~,'.,'~. ~ ~ ~~ - o Z4~ ~.~A u ~ V '~! ! ~^~~.
°'W~ yy '~ -,~' `g f a ~ "~ ~
-...-.
'~j '~ +
re ~~~ ~~
{ ~~ ~$1 ~ ~1 `~-.,~ ,,,,~ ~ \ ~:~;..~.. - ~ +'" ~ '.'`yam
~ i,1 w_' ;
GRAPHIC SCALE USGS LOCATION MAP N
1" = 2000'
2000' o zooo' SILVER CREEK SUBDIVISION
JONES LANDING, INC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
'••N•~• DATE: 06-8A7 USGS ZS' TOPO QUAD:
ANGIER, NC
'W e ~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB clllc'DBY: JAB
308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60004 FIGI7RE #: 1
S

GRAPHIG SCALE WAKE COUNTY SOIL SUR`dEY ~IAP N
1" = 1320' SILVER CREEK SUBDIVISION
1320' 0 1320'
JONES LANDING, TI~dC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
''•~N••'• D DATE: 06-08-07 SHEET(S): 93 & l00
W E'~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC• DRAWN BY: TMB CIIK'D BY: JAB
308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
• S •• Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJEC'C #: 60004 FIGURE #: 2

iy
/)~
;~
i ~ /~
i
~ ///
'Y
~~~. 1 ~~
~ ~ ~ ~~
~,~,
'! I J I; ~ ~ j ~~
I ~
~ ~ ~ _
- `~
-, ~
I~
I
~l ~ , ~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ~
,~/, , ~
~~
i
~ __
~ ;~ I i I
• II ~
i I \\f
I
~,
I
i
~J ~ ~. / - _
N ~ .A - =
j ; t ,_ _. ~ ~~~~~
-~
F
~'
i
~< , `, ` `,
tt ,~ ,
~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~
1 ~ ~ ~-~ ~
~ ~ l ~~, ~~~ ~ _
~\

~~
~-.~
--~_~ ~ ~~
_ ,
` - ~ -
1" = 200'
--_ - - ___ _ ~` 7 • 1 0 9 8
~-- -
~ ~.
IMPACt # 1 ~ _ __ __ __ __
'~ ~'~ "'sa ~ ~ % N; ! LEGEND ~~~,
WETLANDS =1,~ s ~ ,,
O.O44ac ~ ~ ~ ~1 ,
~~ / ~ RIFF~I P I _ _ JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNELS THAT ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE ~
STF~EAM CHANNEL =1 ~2 ' ~~ ; ~ , '~ - - NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES
-- -----
~- - ~~' ~~ ~ ~ ~' JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
Z~ 1= 6565 SF ~
__- ~ ~~, `- ~ NOTES:
~.,~ _ 1 J THE DESIGNATION AND LIMITS OF THESE FEATURES MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE US
LVIVC L -- 31 Q6 $-F `` _ -_ _ ~~y ~ NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. i
__ _ ~ 2) JUR DCC IONALO! I THESE FEATURES WERE LOCATED USING TRIMBLE
=- - , ~~-- _ ~ ~ NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT SUB-METER GPS. THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF
- ~~ -- SOLATED WATERS OF THE US.
- ~~~ 3.) BASE MAP AND CROSSING DESIGN DATA PROVIDED 8Y ARCADIA CONSULTING I
~' ~ •~-' : ~. - -_ - ' ENGINEERS, PLLC
~ ~ i
` ~ ~! ---
RIF~RAP ly I -~ _ _, ,, ~,__ ---- ---- ------ ---- _-- -- - - - - -
I ~ON RETE ;
l
,APR~N "
~ ~ '~'~~N~'''•, DATE, 06.13.0
___ ,, ~ ~. ~ ~ ;• ~ SURFACE WATERS & WETLANDS IMPACT MAP scnLE~ ns sx~
~so.~j ~ ~ ~• ~' ~ ~ ;w E•~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. SILVER CREEKSUBDNISION DR.awNSV: T
II e T Q ' 11 ~ 1 ,~ ~ 50 ' 308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 JONES LANDING, INC. CHK'D BY: JAJ
1 N V ~ 1 /'l 1 '' V , ,. S •' ; ~ Telephone (9l9) 841-9977-Fax [phone] FUQUAY_VARINA, WADE C~~NZ.1,, NC PROJECT #: 60(
i
FIGURE #: 3

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Silver Creek Subdivision Date: 6/12/07
Applicant /Owner: Jones Landing, Inc. County: Wake
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette -Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID:UP@Flag#515
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 9.
2. Pinus taeda FAC 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Shr/Sap FAC+ 11.
4. Pinus taeda FAC 12.
5. Juniperus virginiana FACU- 13.
6. Juncus effusus Herb FACW+ 14.
7. Toxicodendron radicans FAC 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 71
Remarks: More than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that the
hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: NA (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The absence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is not met.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wahadkee silt loam (0-2 % slopes) Drainage Class: poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluventic Haplaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriation:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-16 B SYR 4/6 sandy clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The lack of hydric soil field indicators shows that the hydric soils criterion is not met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks: This location does not meet the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the absence of wetland
hydrology and hydric soils.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Silver Creek Subdivision Date: 6/12/07
Applicant /Owner: Jones LandingLInc. County: Wake
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette -Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID:WL@Fla #g 515
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus a ffusus Herb FACW+ 9.
2. Typha latifolia OBL 10.
3. Polvgonum lapathifolium FACW 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: More than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that the
hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines

Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is met.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wahadkee silt loam (0-2 % slopes) Drainage Class: poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluventic Haplaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
finches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-6 A lOYR 3/3 sandy loam
6-16 C lOYR 3/1 sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of low chroma colors confirms that the hydric soils criterion is met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
t!l~et!and Hydrology Present? Yes X No t!1!i#hin a !~!e#land? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This location meets the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the presence of hydrophytic
vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils.

Recei~ied 05 03 2007 11;24
05/03/2007 11:09 FAX [phone] ARCADIA ENGINEERS
~N
•'W ~~, BURDETTE LANA CONS'U'LTING, INC.
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone [phone] -Fax [phone]
S
AGENT AUTHORI,ZA,TZON FORM
[~ ool
US Army Corps of Engiu~,eers North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory k'ield Office Central Office
6508 fialls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
To Whom It May Concern:
By signing below, the current property owner gives representatives of Burdette Land
Consulting, Inc. permission to act as their authorized agent for jurisdictional and isolated waters
and riparian buffer determinations, delineation, and permitting for the subject project. This
authorizati,oan includes permission to entez the site to conduct site meetings with CJS Army Corps
of Engineers and NC Division of Water Quality personnel, as necessary.
Project Name: Silver Creek (formerly Mal Weathers Rd) Subdivision
SLC Project #:
Current Property Owner or Casement Holdex:
Name: Jones Landing Inc.; Percv Johnson,_President
(include contact person if a corparalion, partnership, or government)
Mailing Address: 165 Sommerville Park Rd_
Ra1ei~:h NC 27603
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Percy Johnson. President
Signatu Print Name (include title, if appropriate)
4-24-07
Date