WI0600047_Monitoring (Report)_20180208

Permit No.: try 0(6 00,) -/ 7-
Permittee/Facility Name:
Report Name and Date:
/40,-) /e-Er r �� �/� 7
Reviewer: /14 f't
Date Reviewed: 9/(0g
1. BIMS:
Nonisc
rescission.
S �
Routine Monitoring Report Review (MRR) Checklist
&) o7-e : ,?e/or,.-
4't .� �' ►
L f v1 07--
66
/ > �J/ /m)
Expiration date:
/ / . If Expired; check with Permittee if they want to renew. For
arge (ND) permit, if they don't want to renew, they will have to request
t issued date: /
2. BIMS: Log report in Events Tab. Select-> `Compliance Schedule Met' and enter name
and date of report, and date we received. Also, note that a MRR was completed and
inserted into report.
3. BIMS: For 51 reports- has Injection Event Report (IER) been received and info entered
into BIMS (Yes or No). If No, check file to see if we have received and then
enter into BIMS. If never received, then request from Consultant and CC Permittee via
email. After receipt of IERs from these parties, enter into BIMS. For ND reports- Also,
check if billing is up to date. If past due, notify Permittee/Consultant via email, and
include contact info for Teresa Revis to send payment (contact info below).
• ,,j47 g/Mc
)
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Teresa.Revis[a)ncdenr.gov
[phone]
4. BIMS: Check Wells Tab and see if GW-is/GW-30s (if applicable) have been entered:
70.4 (Yes or No). If No and well status is still `proposed', then check file to see if
we have received GW- l s and then enter into BIMS. If not received, then request from
consultant and CC Permittee. After receipt from these parties, enter as -built well
construction into BIMS; and well abandonment data, if applicable.
Page 1 of 2 Rev. 7-17-2017

5. For 5I reports- Do a quick review of report to see if there are any obvious impacts from
injection activities by reading Summary and Conclusions/Recommendation Section, and
monitoring data tables. Compare pre -injection levels of sulfate, iron, phosphate, etc. to
post injection levels and note this below. Also, note if there are any spikes in daughter
products. If there are no impacts evident, indicate 'No impacts from injection evident'.
NOTE: The groundwater quality at the site must be monitored until concentrations meet
pre -injection levels or 2L standards before the permit can eventually be Completed in
BIMS, and a Completion Letter Sent to Permittee.
For Non -Discharge reports- Also check influent and effluent concentrations, most
permits require a minimum 95% reduction in concentrations.
NOTES: 1e ,- o - W tee,#.
9e-o-. li (lritir!-
6. When this Monitoring Report Review is complete, securely insert inside cover of
monitoring report and file.
Page 2 of 2 Rev. 7-17-2017

Table 129. Groundwater Analyses for Total and Dissolved Metals. NC DOT Priority Site No. 32. Lillinaton. N.C.
Well
Date
Arsenic
total dissolved
Chromium
total dissolved
Iron
total dissolved
Lead
total dissolved
Manganese
total . dissolved
Phosphorous
total dissolved
32-1 V-1
( 6/15/2010
\ 0.1
<0. 0
0.182
<0.0100 290 x• <0.0100 v0.0744
<0.0100
., /2.40
,.7 <0.0100
' 3.03
<0.05
/
12/9/2011
0.0653
<0.0100
0.133
<0.0100 187 <0.100 .r 0.0659
<0.0100
%` 2.54
<0.0100
4.22
<0.05
32-MW-1
6/15/2010
<0.0100
<0.0100
0.0143
<0.0100 27.2 <0.0100 <0.0100
<0,0100
0.220
0.0928
0.27
<0.05
12/9/2011
Insufficient Water
32-1V1W-2
6/15/2010
<0.0100
<0.0100
<0.0100
<0.0100 29.4 <0,0100 <0.0100
<0.0100
0.282
0.0641
0.66
<0.05
12/9/2011
Insufficient Water
32-MW-7
6/15/2010
0.0237
<0.0100
0.105
<0.0100 229 <0.0100 0.0813
<0.0100
0.988
0.0373
3.44
0.16
12/9/2011
Insufficient Water
32-MW-8
6/15/2010
0.111
<0.0100
0.175
<0.0100 438 <0.0100 0.0838
<0,0100
4.06
0.0375
5.42
<0.05
12/9/2011
0.0946
<0.0100
0.168
<0.0100 336 <0.100 0.113
<0.0100
5.00
0.0302
2.67
<0.05
32-MW-9
6/15/2010
We11 Destroyed by Property Owner's Activities
32-MW-9R
12/9/2011
<0.0100
<0.0100
0.0101
<0,0100 14.4 0.166 <0.0100
<0.0100
0,671
0.491
1.40
<0.05
32 MW-10
6/15/2010
0.12
<0.0100
0.209
<0.0100 267 <0.100 0.0790
<0.0100
3.14
0.0891
2.54
<0.05
12/9/2011
0.113
<0.0100
0.230
<0.0100 292 <0.100 0.0888
<0.0100
4.61
0.0133
3.80
<0.05
32-MW 11
6/15/2010
<0.0100
<0.0100
0.0207
<0.0100 30.2 <0.100 <0.0100
<0.0100
0.308
0.0589
0.87
0.59
12/9/2011
0.0153
<0.0100
0.0677
<0.0100 103 <0.100 0.0225
<0.0100
0.986
0.0267
0.84
<0.05
32-MW-12
6/15/2010
0.457
<0.0100
0,901
<0.0100 1950 <0.100 0.282
<0.0100
29.9
0.0102
4.56
<0.05
12/9/2011
0.151
<0.0100
0.310
<0.0100 532 <0.100 0.102
<0.0100
8.05
0.0103
4.38
<0.05
32-MW-13
6/15/2010
We11 Destroyed by Property Owner's Activities
32-MW-13R
12/9/2011
<0.0100
<0.0100
0.0174
<0.0100 45.1 <0.100 0.0129
<0.0100
0.268
0.101
0.29
0.18
32-MW-14
6/15/2010
<0.0100
<0.0100
0.0335
<0.0100 105 <0.100 0.0344
<0.0100
0.476
0.177
1.51
<0.05
12/9/2011
<0,0100
<0.0100
0.0757
<0.0100 289 <0.100 0.0823
<0.0100
2.29
0.466
1.18
<0.05
32-MW-15
6/15/2010
Well Destroyed by Property Owner's Activities
32-MW-15R
12/9/2011
0.197
<0.0100
0.0478
<0.0100 72.8 <0.100 0.0348
<0.0100
2.43
0.244
0.60
<0.05
32-MW-16
6/15/2010
Well Destroyed by Property Owner's Activities
32-MW-16R
12/9/2011
0.592
<0.0100
0.0607
<0.0100 98.7 <0.100 0.771
<0.0100
2.59
0.400
1.42
<0.05
32-1VIW-17
6/15/2010
0.0550
<0.0100
0.202
<0.0100 436 <0.100 0.0875
<0.0100
2.69
0.457
4.44
<0.05
12/9/2011
0.0175
0.0124
0.0144
<0.0100 36.3 0.304 <0.0100
<0.0100
3.93
2.43
63.7
50.8
32-MW-18
6/15/2010
<0.0100
<0.0100
<0.0100
<0.0100 9.09 <0.100 <0.0100
<0.0100
0.468
0.372
<0.05
<0.05
12/9/2011
0.0238
0.0228
<0.0100
<0.0100 26.1 0.111 <0.0100
<0.0100
3.21
0.915
13.1
6.57
All concentrations shown in mg/L.
T-480

Table 128. Laboratory Analytical Results for Volatile Organic Compounds - 13 June 2013.
Cis-1,2-DCE Trans-1,2-DCE VC
Etg/L µcool/L µg/L µcool/L µg/L µcool/L
Well
Designation
1,1-DCE
µg/L µmol/L
32-MW-1 34.2 3.53E-01 1.5 1.5E-02 <0.50 <5.2E-03 1.4 2.2E-02
32-DW-1 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 --1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-2 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-7 6.10 6.29E-02 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-8 49.4 5.10E-01 0.94 9.7E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-9 Destroyed
32-MW-9R 2.3 2.4E-02 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-10 71.7 7.40E-01 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-11 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-12 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-13 Destroyed
32-MW-13R <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-14 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-15 Destroyed
32-MW-16 Destroyed
32-MW-15R Destroyed
32-MW-16R 5.00 5.16E-02 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-17 39.0 3.51E-01 1.9 2.0E-02 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-18 124 1.28E+00 4.9 5.1E-02 <0.50 <5.2E-03 2.4 3.8E-02
32-MW-19 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-20 68.6 7.08E-01 0.60 6.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-21 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-22 24.0 2.48E-01 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-23 44.4 4.58E-01 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-24 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
32-MW-25 0.96 9.9E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <0.50 <5.2E-03 <1.0 <1.6E-02
8.9E-02
Notes: 1.0E-01
Benzene detected at 34.0 µg/L and 88.9 µg/L in 32-MW-9R and 32-MW-22, respectively.
sec-Butylbenzene detected at 0.82 µg/L and 1.8 µg/L in 32-MW-9R and 32-MW-22, respectively.
1,2-Dichloroethane detected at 0.69 µg/L, 0.54 Ftg/L, 1.2 µg/L in 32-MW-22, 32-MW-10,
and 32-MW-18, respectively.
1,2,3-Trichloropropane detected at 2.8 µg/L in 32-MW-10.
Ethylbenzene detected at 1.7 µg/L in 32-MW-9R.
Isopropylbenzene detected at 2.3 µg/L and 3.8 µg/L in 32-MW-9R and 32-MW-22, respectively.
Naphthalene detected at 85.8 Itg/L and 128.0 µg/L in 32-MW-9R and 32-MW-22, respectively.
n-Propylbenzene detected at 0.53 µg/L in 32-MW-9R.
1,2,4-trimethyl benzene detected at 35.8 µg/L, 6.2 Ntg/L, 6.1 µg/L, and 4.1 Etg/L in 32-MW-9R,
32-MW-22, 32-MW-17, and 32-MW-18, respectively.
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene detected at 13.6 µg/L and 15.3 µg/L in 32-MW-9R and 32-MW-22, respectively.
m-,p-Xylene detected at 13.8 µg/L and 1.8 µg/L in 32-MW-9R and 32-MW-22 , respectively.
o-Xylene detected at 29.8 µg/L and 31.7 µg/L in 32-MW-9R and 32-MW-22 , respectively.
V/NnL G 1.4124D15--
"CRPri
gay
, ti
T-478

PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretor
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
September 2016
Lee Aiken, Director of Manufacturing Services
Precision Fabrics Group, Inc.
P.O. Box 214448
Greensboro, NC 27420
Re: Issuance of Injection Permit WI0400093
Precision Fabrics Group, Inc., - Greensboro Facility
Guilford County, NC
Dear Mr. Aiken:
Director
In accordance with the renewal application with modification received on August 9, 2016, and additional
information received September 12, and September 15, 2016, we are forwarding permit number WI0400093.
This permit is to inject ABC. DHC Bacteria; and Magnesium Hydroxide or Sodium Hydroxide to remediate
groundwater contaminated with VOCs at the facility referenced above.
This permit shall be effective from date of issuance until August 31, 2021, and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations stated therein, including the requirement to submit a Final Project Evaluation (FPE)
as stated in PART VII — MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Please read the entire permit
to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the permit.
• Please note the following:
• Per permit condition Part VI.5, prior to closing this permit, the Permittee must meet
groundwater quality standards or pre -injection levels, whichever concentration is higher, for all
of the injection constituents; otherwise, continued monitoring as approved in the monitoring
plan will be required until such levels can be established;
• Per permit conditions Part VI.3 &4, and IX.2(G), within 30 days after each injection event,
please provide the well construction (if not previously submitted) and injection information on
the applicable forms listed below. Note: if well construction/abandonment information is
essentially the same (e.g., direct push points or geo-probes), then only one GW-1 or GW-30
form is needed. Just indicate in the comments section on the form the total number of well
points. These forms are available on the Division of Water Resources' website at
http://portaLncdenr.oraI ebhwq/ups/crwpro/reporting-forms
Injection Event Record
i Well Construction Record (GW-1)
➢ Well Abandonment Record (GW-30)
Stale of North Carolina Environmental Quality 1 Water Resources
1611 Mail service Center j Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1611
919 707 9000

Page 2 of 2
In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of this well for the stated purpose. you should submit an application
to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. As indicated in the permit. this permit is not
transferable to any person without prior notice to, and approval by, the Director of the Division of Water
Resources. If you have any questions regarding your permit or the Underground Injection Control Program.
please call me at [phone].
Best Regards.
Michael Rogers. P.G. (NC & FL) vl
UIC Program Manager, Hydrogeologist\ 1 r-
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section 'a
�1
Z
'"‘ X.C' c\
cc: George Smith and Jim Gonsiewski. WQROS — WinstonSalem Regional Office
Central Office File. WI0400093 N j. ((
-,
Ed Hollifield, ERM NC, Inc., 15720 Brixham Hill Avenue. Suite 120, Charlotte "NC 28277
6

5! Final rroject Evaluation (FPE) Checklist
Permittee/Facility Name: IL% C D e
Permit No.: WI 0 (0Da p ?—
Reviewer: /ft
Date: I/2_
1. Permit Issued date: ZA�p 5 Expiration date: 00/
2. BIMS: Check to see if there is a current renewal Application for this permit number under
review. If yes, then a FPE is not needed at this time.
3. What is intent of Permittee for this site (i.e., permit complete and no further injection
activities planned, monitoring only)? If future injection activities are planned and/or
monitoring will continue for an extended time, then permit needs to be renewed and a FP) ,J
may not be needed at this time f_C eck with UIC Program Manager on ho to proceed). i"
J. o p . ems - �' r p40s
,„ MQ.")
4. FPE or equivalent received? / (Yes or No). Date received:
5. If FPE or Add Info is neyded. Date request is sent: 9/22//6 . Date received:
(? r -O) Se' />
6. Proposed monitoring reports received for most part (FPE may suffice if all historical
monitoring data is included)? LI (Yes or No).
7. Proposed sampling frequency complied with (e.g., monitored for 4 quarters)? 14
(Yes or No). a 1t (4
8. Proposed parameters analyzed? t( (Yes or No).
9. Any clear evidence of daughter products? (Yes or No). If evident. RO may want to
review.
10. GW-1 Well Construction records or equivalent received? (Yes or No). if Yes,
enter as -built well construction into BIMS Wells Tab. If No, check file to see if we have
received and then enter info into BIMS. If never received, then request records from
Consultant and CC Permittee via email or USPS mail. After receipt of GW-ls from these
parties then enter into BIMS (be sure and determine well status).
Date 'As Built' well construction info entered into BIMS:
Status of injection wells (i.e., active- to be use as monitoring wells, abandoned, etc.):
11. If wells abandoned, GW-30s records received? (Yes or No). If Yes. enter info into
B1MS Wells Tab. If No, obtain as mentioned above. Date Well Status changed in BIMS to
`Permanently Abandoned':
FPE Checklist (Rev. 9-20-2016)

(Note- if we have not received GW-1 s/30s for DPT/Geoprobe wells and obtaining these
records is problematic, injection well status forms (GW-68) may suffice. Bottom line, we
need some kind of a record, even e-mail from the Permittee/Consultant, with info on when
the well points were plugged.)
12. Any outstanding NOVs in BIMS? / V 0 (Yes or No).
13. Review FPE (or equivalent) to see if there are any obvious impacts from injection activities.
Be sure to read Summary and Conclusions/Recommendation Section, and monitoring data
tables. Compare pre -injection levels of sulfate, iron, phosphate, etc. to post -injection levels
and note this below. Also note if there are any spikes in daughter products. If there are no
impacts evident, indicate 'No impacts from injection evident' and proceed to Item No. 14
below and close out permit. If there are impacts, notify the Permittee/Consultant that the
groundwater qualify at the site will need to be monitored until concentrations have met pre -
injection levels or 2L standards before the permit can be Completed in BIMS and a
Completion Letter Sent. Use the Notes Section below to note impacts (i.e., types of elevated
parameters) and communications with Permittee/Consultant.
P-fiAer o7
w2 ?A 6 b i'
e r 8 L of .v.,ra°cst.. .
NOTES: ajio_
41 ✓ra
14. Date permit completed in BIMS (select `Permit Completed' in Events Tab):
15. Date Permit Completion Letter sent to Permittee and Consultant (scan letter and put in
electronic well permit file on Share (S) Drive):
16. Date Expired Permit List/Spreadsheet updated on Share (S) Drive:
FPE Checklist (Rev. 9-20-2016)