WI0700123_Report_20130906

Cc: Shirley McMaster; John Olson
Subject: SJAFB GW Remediation Permits Info Request
Michele -
Attached is list with information we need on permits issued to the SJAFB. Instead of asking for info for various
permits piecemeal, I pulled a list w/all expired/active permits in which we need info per the permit or rule
requirements.
Thanks
From: Michele Mabry [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 10:06 AM
To: Rogers, Michael
Cc: Shirley McMaster; John Olson
Subject: RE: WI0700090 SJAFB SAC Fuel Hydrant System Leak (ERP Site SS-12)
Michael,
We had applied for the permit for Site SS-12 with the intention of injecting surfactants to mobilize and aid in
LNAPL removal; however, there is a commingled plume with SS-12 and adjacent site SS-35. SS-12 and SS-35
are now one combined site, with the SS-12 portion still active (hence no closure report). We did not perform
the injection at SS-12; instead, we completed a Corrective Measures Study on the new combined site and
recommended MNA with passive LNAPL recovery. The combined site is currently being transferred to another
division within the USAF.
The injection permit that we applied for will not be needed for this site. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Michele Y. Mabry, P.G.
Project Manager / Geologist
2

direct: 651-325-1489
michelemabaywest.com
Bay West, Inc.
Customer -Focused Environmental & Industrial Solutions
5 Empire Drive, St. Paul, MN 55103
24-hrs: 1-800-279-0456
www.bavwest.com
Check it out... Bay West Way of Being
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Rogers, Michael[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:24 PM
To: Michele Mabry
Cc: Shirley McMaster
Subject: WI0700090 SJAFB SAC Fuel Hydrant System Leak (ERP Site SS-12)
H; Michele -
Greetings. As in the case below, we would like to close out the permit in our system referenced above.
Looking at the file, we never rec'd any well construction/abandonment, injection event, or monitoring records
including a Final Project Evaluation (FPE) for this project.
Please provide the required info. Thanks.
From: Michele Mabry [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 4:13 PM
To: Rogers, Michael
Cc: Shirley McMaster
Subject: FW: BFSA GW-1 forms for EW14-13 and EW14-15
Michael,
3

Please find attached GW-1 forms I completed using available information for the two extraction wells (EW 14-
13 and EW 14-15) for the BFSA at Seymour Johnson AFB. This should satisfy the last requirement of injection
permit WI00700141.
Sincerely,
Michele Mabry
Bay West, Inc.
651-291-3451
michelem@a,baywest.com
From: Michele Mabry
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 3:09 PM
To: Michele Mabry
Subject: BFSA GW-1 forms for EW14-13 and EW14-15
4

REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT Site FT-01, Fire Training Area No. 3
As part of the removal action (RA) being conducted at Site FT-07, Fire Training Area No. 3, at
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base (SJAFB), North Carolina, the second of two planned
potassium permanganate (KMnO4) injection events was completed in September 2009. These
activities were proposed in the August 2009 FT-07 Project Update (URS 2009) and represent the
end of active remediation at the site. The following tables and figures are included in this report.
Table 1.
Table 2
Summary of Response Actions
KMnO4 Injection'Quaritities.(Events 1 and 2)
Figure 1 Removal Action Site Plan
Figure 2 Groundwater Monitoring Decision Process Flow Chart
Figure 3 Benzene, TCE and VC Concentration Trends at "In Plume" Monitoring Wells
All activities were completed in accordance with the Basewide Work Plan (URS 2007a) and
Removal Action Plan (URS 2007b).
SITE BACKGROUND
Site FT-07 background information and physical site characteristics are described in the
Removal Action Plan (URS 2007b). Previous investigation and RA activities completed at the
site are summarized in Table 1.
INJECTION EVENT 2
Approximately 6,000 pounds of KMnO4 were mixed with water to an approximate 2.5 percent
solution (30,695 gallons) and injected into 16 wells in September 2009 following the first
injection (January 2009). In addition to the injection wells, MW-103, MW-105, and MW-108,
which are located along the centerline of the plume, were utilized for KMnO4 injection to
improve distribution into the aquifer. Injection wells were re -developed with a bailer and
peristaltic pump prior to injection to remove accumulated fines. Injection locations and relative
injection volumes for both events are illustrated on Figure 1. Total volumes of KMnO4 injected
during Events 1 and 2 are presented in Table 2. A protective casing was installed at temporary
well TW-1 in December 2009.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Current conditions at Site FT-07 can be characterized as follows:
• 3,676 cubic yards (CY) of soil were excavated in October 2007, removing the major source
of contamination.
• A biosparging system utilizing a compressor and 21 air injection wells was operated for
approximately 1 year to reduce dissolved contaminant concentrations.
• KMnO4 was injected twice into the VOC plume to further reduce contaminant mass.
Se➢mourlohnsonMB
Q:\16161994I\Ff0TRA-Compledon\Final Fig] RAC Textdocl12-Feb-10/OMA 1

TABLE 2
SITE FT-07
KMnO4 INJECTION QUANTITIES (EVENTS 1 AND 2)
I ovation
2ipmhet�
rSan0arg2009
.. ix94.2njeeled
{gallons;
vent2,
September2009
�4fn04 Enleeted
gaffonsjz m
TotalK%1n04
In_,lected
. CgalIons) _ _.
1D
400
1,520
-1,920
1F
600
800
'
1,40Q
2A
1100
1,140
2,240
2B
1000
1,780
2,78Q
2C
400
0
400 .
2D
400
3,020
3,420 .-
2E
400
0
400 -•
2F
400
0
400
2G
- 800
• .
400
...-
1,200
3A-
' .400
"
;•.,0.
400
';
''
•.-.,250.-?.-
650
3D
1080
2,185
3;265. -'
4A
400
1,350
1,750 ` " '
4B
400
0
400
4C
400
80
480
4D
400
230
630
5A
400
0
400
5C
- 400
0
400
5D
800
800
1,600
5E
720
650
1,370
• 5F
50
0
50
MW-103
0
8,640
8,640
MW-105
0
2,000
2,000
MW-I08
0
5,850
5,850
Total
11,350
30,695
42,045
Notes '
'Locations are shown on Figure 1.
2 2.5% to 3% solution in water.
KMnO4 = potassium permanganate
Sevinonr Johnson AFB
01616\9943WTOTRA-Completon\Tab\e22/122010 Page 1 of 1

LEGEND
OO TEMPORARY WELL
MONITORING WELL
SOIL BORING
SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE
DIRECT —PUSH SAMPLE
INJECTION POINT AND ID (USED)
INJECTION POINT AND ID (NOT USED)
TREELINE
GENERAL GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
FORMER 0/W SEPARATOR LINE
SOIL EXCAVATION AREA
ERP SITE BOUNDARY
EXTENT OF VOCs ABOVE NC 2L (JUNE 2009*)
VC > NC 2L (0.015µg/L)
BENZENE > NC 2L (1µg/L)
TCE > NC 2L (2.8p,g/L)
• RESULTS SHOWN FOR. WELLS TW-1, MW-41,
AND MW-103 ARE FROM MARCH 2009
January 13, 2010 6:32:09 a.m.
Drawing: T:\SJAFB\16169952\163\09\ 1 A.dwg
KMNO4 TOTAL GALLONS INJECTED (EVENTS 1 & 2)
50-500
500-5,000
5,000-10,000
MW-11 DEEP
e
FORMER G
EQUIPMENT
TRAILER
LOCATION
BUILDING
WATER TANK
2100
SB-0D1e
50
MW-104
PZ-103
FORMER
BERM/ED
OF PIT
0
50
SCALE IN FEET
SITE FT-07
REMOVAL ACTION SITE PLAN
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE
DRN. BY: DPG
CHICD. BY: DRH
DATG 10/22/09 I PROJECT NO.
DATE: 10/22/09 16169952
KC. N0.
1

January 13, 2010 9:05:56 a.m.
Drawing: T:\SJAFB\16169952\163\09\2.dwp
Proceed To LTM
Sample
Groundwater
Annually -`
SITE FT-07
GROUNDWATER MONITORING DECISION PROCESS
FLOW CHART
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE
DRN. BY: DPG DATE 12/21/09 PROJECT NO. FIG. NO.
CHICD. BY DRH REVISION: 0 16169952 2

FIGURE 3
SITE FT-07
BENZENE, TCE, AND VC CONCENTRATION TRENDS AT "IN PLUME" MONITORING WELLS
—•Benzene
• TCE
Sparge System On
— - — - KMnO4 Injection
Benzene
—A—VC
Sparge System On
— • — • KMnO4 Injection
j120
sol.
;60
,'T c 20'.
--H—Benzene
—A—VC
Sparge System On
— • — • KMn04 Injection
TCE
Source Source Removal/Chem Ox
— — — Sparge System Off
SeymouriohnsonAIR
• Benzene
Source Removal/Chem Ox
— — — Sparge System Off
t Benzene
—A—VC
Sparge System On
— • — • KMn04 Injection
—0--Benzene
—A—VC
Sparge System On
— - — - KMn04 Injection
—i—TCE
Sparge System On
— - — • KMn04lnjection
TCE
Source Source RemovaVChem Ox
— — — Sparge System Off
—CI—TCE
Source Removal/Chem Ox
— — — Spargc System Off
I:\seymour\fpri\FT-07\RA-Completion\Figure 3

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Cotten H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
December 31, 2008
Dennis Goodson, Deputy Base Civil Engineer
4 CES/CEV
1095 Peterson Avenue
Seymour Johnson AFB, NC 27531-2355
RE: Site FT-07, Fire Training Area #3
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base
UIC Program Tracking # WI0700123
Dear Mr. Goodson:
The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program of the Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water
Quality has reviewed the proposal for injection of potassium permanganate for the chemical oxidation of jet fuel
and chlorinated ethenes, received on October 17, 2008. The proposed injection project as presented in the work
plan meets relevant state regulatory requirements (15A NCAC 2C.0200) for construction and operation of
injection wells, provided that RCRA Metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium,
silver) are incorporated into the list of analytical parameters in the monitoring plan. Post -injection metals
monitoring should continue until concentrations return to background/pre-injection concentrations.
Due -to -the site's coverage -under -the Comprehensive-Environmental-ResponserCompensationrattd-Liability-Act
(CERCLA), the state's administrative permitting requirements have been waived for this project. A technical
report summarizing the project, including monitoring data, should be submitted to the UIC Program upon
completion of the injection project.
Please call me at 919-715-6164 or Debra Watts at 919-715-6699 if you have any questions regarding
this letter or the UIC Program.
Best Regards,
Thomas Slusser, L.G.
Underground Injection Control Program
cc: Elizabeth Hartzell, Division of Waste Management
Aquifer Protection Section — Washington Regional Office
UIC files
ate N""ort�hhCarolina
Natural/it
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard - Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50°% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper