820099_Compliance Inspection Routine_20210708

Facility Number
79
�f BIms -7(1���
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
1
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
6-a
Arrival Time:
30
Farm Name: (IM, ] O Hogs
Owner Name: Cie t g o NI 13Q S
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: RtJ` , ` 11'1' .r 11,P1 (,
f i 7 g precbtive
Onsite Representative: Inte rotor:
Departure Time:
HEIM
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
NRegion: f-ro
Title: ,,
Phone:
Certified Operator: JOb flNI D. I:l N$
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
J
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
37,20
3700
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
D Pout
Design Current
Ca aci °Po
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ,ErSlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes „alto 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: 1
tit
13. Soil Type(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
Structure 2
a
tv N
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes , 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
D Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload
D PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
?es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,,Ial•To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 12ITo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,❑'1(To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
12. Crop Type(s): getiriuda r)aJ , '- 1 a ! tOJ ) C ( ce;
0
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes -❑'`No
❑ Yes .171No
❑ Yes .R%No
❑ Yes ,,12t'No
n Yes .2)No
❑ Yes ON
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA El NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
O NA 0 NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ,_0'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes ,I21)No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA D NE
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: F±lia - crt
'Date of Inspection: i Oa/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ,.�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? n Yes ....RICro ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? n Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ,o ❑ NA 0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes .,,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes •-flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes „e-')•To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
n Yes
❑ Yes
2-1k0
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer t
Use drawings of fa
Explain any YES answers'
explain situations (use
endations or any other comments.;
cait'brautiaN 3 of'I due
--rAceziA tetwyyi cv4,9,,rorn
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
I�Q11C ftte4\oT [ij/'n! #/9,ge/sd�
(kLQ Fontot
Phone:91(1.f:filo- c1 7/ s
Date: -7- - fg
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015

FACILITY #:6' ri
FARM NAME: QN� yQIQoIV bqc9
FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS nrn ep
EXPERIATION DATE diVOc� r`
OIC CAReE9R NO
NUMBER OF ANIMALS ✓ � v'O
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPESNOK
CROP TYPES Ott S9 ) WIN, 08, Wf12C:1-1
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOU ■ VE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
ODOR CONTROL CHEC LIS R NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 1icisiai NITROGEN LEVEL I •01
SOIL REPORT (#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400) PH ( to if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 0) CU Z
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
IRR2 (#21)
ZONE ACRESfl PAN' Ob CROP TYPE eiritAa
FLOW RATES f l(p NITROGEN (N) I • (31
120 Min inspection initialed
,'1l�,, Weather Code
hicken Litter
V NO
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken
c

CALBRIATION (#24)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED 12-
- DATE DUE EVERY/TWO YEARS
- FLOW RATES 1 1(,1
RAJN FALL (#21)
—INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT a,/
—LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
—LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
,UDGE (#21 & 25)
—DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE9r
0/0 RATIO OF SLUDGE
0:1 .1 P:
ts/
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
i
RAIN BREAKER FORM ,r CROP YEILDS MORTALITY ;..�
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE