Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210300 Ver 1_Macon County - B43 - USFW Section 7_20210708 oNT OF). FFISH us.QpP�III%y+�2 SEmVC« N p United States Department of the Interior • FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE oCH 3 'ta Asheville Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Suite#B Asheville,North Carolina 28801 June 19, 2019 Dave McHenry NC Department of Transportation Division 14 253 Webster Road Sylva,NC 28779 Subject: 16-309, Section 7 Concurrence for Macon County Bridge 43 Replacement TIP B- 5919 Dear Mr. McHenry, On June 12, 2019,we received your revised email requesting section 7 concurrence on effects the subject project may have on the federally threatened Indiana bat(Myotis sodalis) and northern long-eared bat(NLEB,Myotis septentrionalis) 4(d)Rule compliance notification. The following comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). You have committed to remove trees required for the project during October 15th to April 15h avoiding impacts to potentially roosting bats. Additionally,the bridge survey for bats and evidence of roosting bats on June 12, 2019 was negative, and the survey did not reveal suitable. roosting habitat. Accordingly, we concur with your determination that the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, the Indiana bat. As outlined in the Biological Opinion completed on the 4(d) rule for the federally threatened Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) on January 5, 2016,this activity is now excepted from take prohibitions for Northern long-eared bat, based on the project location. Project activities in the action area: (1) would not affect a known hibernation site; (2) are not located within '/4 mile of a known hibernation site, or; (3) are not located within a 150' radius of a known maternity(tree) site. Therefore, we believe the requirements under Section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended(16 U.S.C. 15 31 - 1543), are fulfilled. Obligations under Section 7 of the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2)this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action. 1 If you have questions about these comments please contact Ms. Claire Ellwanger of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 235. In any future correspondence concerning these projects, please reference our Log Number 16-309. Sincerely, Gary eeples Deputy Field Supervisor 2