WI0700343_Correspondence_20190228

NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
seiretarp
LINDA CULPEPPER
February 28, 2019
Timothy, Shirley, and Kathryn Baldwin
719 Black Swan Road
New Bern, North Carolina 28560
SUBJECT: Groundwater Sampling Results
UIC Permit No. W10700343
Issued to Timothy, Shirley, and Kathryn Baldwin
New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina
Dear Timothy, Shirley, and Kathryn:
RECs
MAR 042D19
RegionalWater Quality OAerations Section
Staff from the Washington Regional Office of the Water Quality Regional Operations Section
collected samples of the influent (supply well) and effluent (injection well) from your geothermal heat
pump system on January 23, 2019. The samples were analyzed for metals, nutrients, and other inorganic
constituents by the Division of Water Resources laboratory. A summary table of the analytical results, as
well as the laboratory reports, field sampling forms, and definitions of laboratory data qualifiers are attached
to this letter. The following two constituents were detected above state groundwater standards in both
samples from your system:
Parameter
Units
NC Groundwater
Standard
Results
Iron
Micrograms per Liter
(ug/L)
300
1800 (supply well -influent)
1800 (injection well -effluent)
Manganese
Micrograms per Liter
(ug/L)
50
100 {supply well -influent)
100 (injection well -effluent)
El.E Q
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (Division of Water Resources • Washington Regional (Vice
943 Washington square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27RR9
252.946-6481

Timothy, Shirley, and Kathryn Baldwin
February 28, 2019
Page2of2
These exceedances should not affect the use of the wells for your geothermal heat pump system;
however, it is recommended before using the water from these wells for personal consumption that you
consult with the Craven County Health Department. If you have any questions regarding the sampling
results or your permit, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dwight Randy Sipe, P.G., Hydrogeologist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Attachments
cc: „ Stiiisti Shrestha DWR Groundwater Protection Unit, Central Office (electronic copy)
Craven County Health Department
WaRO
£D_EQ
North Carolina Department ofEnvi,onmental Quality Division of Water Resources - Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Corolira 27889
252-946-6481

NC DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
LABORATORYANALYTICAL RESULTS
GEOTHERMAL'HEATING/COOLING RETURN WELL
PERMIT NO.: W10700343
PERMITTEE(S): Timothy, Shirley, and Kathryn Baldwin
SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE: 1/23/19
Parameter
Fecal Conform
Total Coliform
Total Dissolved Solids
Chloride, CI
. Fluoride, FL
Sulfate, SO4
units
CFU/100mI
CFUH00m1
.- mg&L
mg/L
mgll.
mg/L
NCGWSandlor EPAStandard
NCGINS =<1
NCGWS=<1
i '
NCGWS=500
NCGWS=250
NCGWS=2
NCGWS=250
EPA SDWS-500
EPA PDWS=250
EPA PDWS=4A
EPA SDWS =250
InflueritSample Results
<1
<1
I
308
6.1
<0.4
<2.0
Effluent sample Results
<1
<1
I
321
6.2
<0.4
<2.0
Parameterwe:'t:.-:•
Nitrate + Nitrite
- Nitrite
Hardness as CaCO3
(by Calculation)•
Aluminum, Al
Arsenic, As
-
.: Calcium, Ca
units . _ ,
mg&L as N
mg/L as N
I
mgIL as CaCO3
- PgIL
pglL
- - mg/L
NCGWS and/or EPA Standard
.
NCGWS=11
NCGWS=1
I
NS
NS
NCGWS=10
NS
EPA PDWS=11
EPA PDWS=11
EPA SDWS=50 to200
EPA PDWS=10
Influent Sample Results
. <0.02
<0.01
I
274
<50
<2.0
96
' Effluent Sample Results
<0.02
<0.01
I
273 -
<50
<2.0
96
Parameter . -
Chromium, Cr
Copper, Cu
Iron, Fe
Potassium, K
Magnesium, Mg
Manganese, Mn
units
PgeL
pglL
11911-
mg&L
mg0.
Pg&L
NCGWS and/or EPA Standard
NCGWS=10
NCGWS=1000
NCGWS=300
NS
NS
NCGWS=50
EPA PDWS = 100
EPA SDWS= 1000; PDWS
= 1300
EPA SDWS = 300
EPA SOWS = 50
Influent Sample Results
<5.0
21 I
1800
1.1
8.3
100
Effluent Sample Results
<5.0
15 I
1800
1 -
8.0
100
Parameter
Sodium, Na
Nickel, NI
Lead, Pb
Zinc, Zn
pH (field)
units
mg/L
PO-
pg/L
491E
units
NCGWS and/or EPA Standard
NS
NCGWS=108
NCGWS=15
NCGWS=1000
NC GWS = 6.5-8.6
EPA PDWS=15
EPA SDWS = 6000
EPA SDWS = 6.5 to 8.5
Influent Sample Results
6
<2.0 I
<2.0
17
6.5
Effluent Sample Results
6
<2.0 I
3.1
17
6.5
NC GWS= North Carolina Groundwater Standards per.15A NCAC 2L .0200
EPA PDWS= Environmental Protection Agency Primary Drinking Water Standards
EPA SDWS Environmental Protection Agency Secondary Drinking Water Standards
NS = No Standard
' Calculation performed by WaRO

AC59001 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratory Results
Loc. Dosch. W10700343-BALDWIN GEOTHERMAL RETURN WELL
County: aura Collector: R SIPE VISIBD
Region: Washlnetog Report To WARO Location lb: gALDWINGEOTHERMA
River Saeln ! Collect Date: 01/23/2019 Priority COMPLIANCE
Emergency Collect Time: nag . Sample Matrix: GROUNDWATER
C0C Yes/No Sample Depth Loc. Type: GeotharmalSupply Well
Final Report
If this report Is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Sample ID: AC59001
PO Number,/
Date Received: 01124/2019
Time Recahted: 08:20
Labworks LoglnlD TASCENZOI
Delivery Method 7jC CoudeE
Final Report Data: asag
Report PrMt Date: 02/26(2019
CAS # Analvte Name
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
Result/
Pg_L Qualifier
LAB
2.1
Units
"0
Method Analysis,
Reference Date validated by
1/24/19 MSWIFT
MIC
Coliform, MF Fecal In liquid 1 1 Q1
CFU/100m1 SM 9222 D•1997 . 1/24/19 ESTAFFORD1
Cobiform, MF Total in liquid 1 1 82,01 CFU1100m1 SM 9222 B-1897 1/24/19 ESTAFFORD1
NO2+No3 as N in liquid
NUT
0.02 0.02 U mg/LasN EPA3632 REV2 1/24/19 CGREEN
WET •
Bromide 0.4 0,4U mg/L EPA 300.0rer2.1 1/25/19 CGREEN
Chloride
1.0 6.1 mg/L EPA '300.0rev2.1 1/25/19 CGREEN
Fluoride
0.4 U mg/L EPA 300.0 rov2.1 1/25/19 CGREEN
Sulfate
2.0 2.0 U
mg/L
EPA 300.0 re12..1 125/19 CGREEN
Total Dissolved Solids In liquid
12 . 308 mg/L SM 2640 C-1997 1/24/19 CGREEN
MET
Al by ICP 50 50 U ug/L EPA200.7 Rev4.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
As by ICPMS
2.0 2.0 U
ug/L EPA200.9 Rev5.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
Ca by ICP
0.10 96.. mg/L EPA 200.7 Rav4-4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
Cr by ICPMS 5.0 5.0 U ug/L EPA200.9 Rev5.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
Cu by ICPMS
2.0 • 21 ug/L EPA200.8 Rev5.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
Fe by ICP "50 1800- ug/L EPA 200.7 Rev4.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORD1
K by ICP
0.10 1,1 mg/L EPA200.7 Rev4.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
Mg by ICP
0.10 - 8.3 mg/L EPA200.7 Rev4.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORD1
Mn by ICP
10 100 ug/L EPA200.7 Rev4.4 2/8/19 ESTAFFORDI
Na by ICP '0.10 6.0 • mg/L EPA 200.7 Rev4.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORD1
Ni by ICPMS 2.0 2.0 U ug/L EPA203.8 Rev5.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
Pb by ICPMS 2.0 2.0 U ugA. EPA200.8 Rev5.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
Zn by ICPMS
10 17 ug/L EPA 200.8 Rev5.4 2/4/19 ESTAFFORDI
WSS chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Moll Service Cooler, Raleigh, NC 278994523 [phone]
"Not Detected" or "U' does. not indicate *tumble is enalyte hoe but that the analyse is not detected at or above the POL
..-.., Page 1 of 3

9✓C' (DWR, ta6aratorySection Ryaufu/Sample Comments/Q!m&ferWee i'nitiana
. Sample ID: AC69001
CAS # Analvte Name
Result/
Qualifier
its
Method
Reference
Analysis
Date
Velkleted by
Sample Comments
MIC:Total COIBom}B2-Counts from all fitters = 0.
MIC:Total Conform -Di -Sample exceeded holding time prior to receipt at lab.
MIC:Fecal Coliform-Qt-Sample exceeded holding rime prior to receipt et lab.
NCDEQ-WSS-Chemistry Lab Data Qualifiers
Al The reported value is an average, where at least one result is qualified with a'U'. The PQL is used for the qualified result(S) to cal;
B1 Coliform-Countable membranes with less than 20 colonies. Reported value is estimated or is a total of the counts on all filters repor
132 Colifonn-Counts from all filters were zero. The value reported is based on the number of colonies per 100 ml that would have been
83 Col'Ifonn-Countable membranes with more than 60"or 80 colonies. The value reported is calculated using the count from the smaller
84 Coliform-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and <20. Reported value is estimated or is a total ofthe counts on all fitters reported
B5 Coliform-Too many colonies were present; to numerous to count (TNTC). TNTC Is generally defined as >150 colonies.
B6 Coliform-Estimated Value. Blank contamination'evident.
B7 Coliform-Many non-colifonn or non-enterococcus colonies or Interfering non-coliform or nonenterococcus growth present. In this cc
681 MPN-No wells or tubes gave a positive reaction. Value based upon the appropriate MPN Index and reported as a less than "<" vat*
B82 MPN-All wells or tubes gave positive reactions. Value based upon the MPN Index and reported as a greater than'>" value.
C Total residual chlorine was present in sample upon receipt In the laboratory; value is estimated.
G1 BOD-The dissolved oxygen (DO) depletion of the dilution water blank exceeded 0.2 mg/L.
G2 BOD-The bacterial seed controls did not meet the requirement of a DO depletion of at least 2.0 mg/L and/or a DO residual of at lea;
G3 BOD-No sample dilution met the requirement of a D0 depletion of at least 2.0 mg/Land/or a DO residual of at least 1.0 mg/L.
G4 BOD-Evidence of toxicity. This is generally characterized by a significant increase in the BOD value as the sample concentration de
G5 BOD-The glucose/ glutamic acid standard exceeded the 'range of 198 ± 30.5'mg/L.
G6 BOD-The calculated seed correction exceeded the range of 0.6 to 1.0mg/L.
G7 BOD-Less than 1 mg/L DO remained for all dilutions set. The reported value is an estimated greater than value and is calculated to;
G8 BOD-Oxygen usage is less than 2 mg/L for all dilutions set. The reported value is en estimated less than value and is calculated for
G9 BOD-The DO depletion of the dilution water blank produced a negative value.
J1 Surrogate recovery limits have bean exceeded.
J2 The reported value failed to meet the established quality control criteria for either precision or accuracy.
WSS Chemtatry Laboratory» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 276894523 19191733-3808
"Not Detected' or "U" does not Indicate the sample is analyte free but that the analyte Is not detected at or above the PQL.
Page 2 of 3

WC WD'M& La6oratory Section 4itsukr/Sample Cammenu/Qaa4fler(Definition:
sample ID: AC59001
CAS #
Analvte Name
DL Res
Qualifier
Unita
Meta
Analysis
Date Validated by
J3 The sample matrix Interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination.
J4 The data is questionable because of improper laboratory or field protocols (e.g., composite sample was collected instead of grab. p
J5 Temperature limits exceeded (samples frozen or >6°C) during transport or not verifiable (e.g., no temperature blank provided): non-
J8 The laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample. The data may not be accurate.
J7 This qualifier Is used to identify analyte concentration exceeding the upper calibration range of the analytical instrument/method. Th
J8 Temperature limits exceeded (samples frozen or>e°C) during storage, the data may not be accurate.
J9 The reported value is determined by a one -point estimation rather than against a regression equation. The estimated concentration
J10 Unidentified peak; estimated value.
J11 The reported value is determined by a one -point estimation rather than against a regression equation. The estimated concentration
J12 The calibration verification did not meet the calibration acceptance criterion for field parameters.
M Sampleandduplicate results are "out of control". The sample is non -homogenous (e.g., VOA soil). The reported value is the lower'
N1 Presumptive evidence and estimated value. The component has been tentatively identified base on mass spectral library.
N2 There is an Indication that the analyte is present, but quality control requirements for confirmation were not met (i.e., presence of a
N3 This code shall be used if the level is too low to‘permit accurate quantification, but the estimated concentration is less than the labo
N4 This code shall be used if the level is too loiv''td-.permit accuratd'quanfification, but the estimated concentration is less than the labo
N5 The component has been tentatively identified based on a retention time standard.
Q1 Holding time exceeded prior to receipt by lab.
02 Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab. •
P Elevated PQL° due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution.
S Not enough sample provided to prepare and/or analyze a method -required matrix spike (MS) and/or matrix spike duplicate (MSD).
U Indicates that the analyte was analyzed forbut not detected above the reported practical quantitation limit'. The number value repo'
X1 Sample not screened for this compound. •
X2 Sampled, but analysis lost or not performed -field error.
X3 Sampled, but analysis lost or not performed -lab error.
✓ Indicates the analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Note: The value in the blank shall not be s
Y Elevated PQL• due to insufficient sample size.
Z1 Inability to analyze the sample.
Z2 Questions concerning data reliability. •
U, J6 The laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or Improperly chemically preserved sample. The data may not be accurate.
UU Indicates that the analyte was not detected by a screen analysis. The number value was determined by a one -point estimation at tl
WSS Chemistry Laboratory)", 1623 Mall Service Canter, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 (919) 7333906
"Not Detected" or"U" does not Indkate the sample Is analyte tree but that the analyte Is not detected at or above the PQL
• • Page 3 of 3

Ac59002 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratory Results
Loc. Dsscr.: W10700343-RALDWIN GEOTHERMAL RETURN WELL
County: Cmvan Collector. RSIPE Vita()
Region: Weshin9ton Report To y(yfQ Location ID: pAJpWJl0E07HERMA
River Basin fg Collect Date: p1123R019 Pdodty COMPLIANCE
Emergency Collect Time: 10:00 Sample Matta. GROUNDWATER
COO Yes/No Sample Depth Loc. Type: Geothemral$uoeNwall
Final Report
If thls report Is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do net use for Regulatory purposes.
Sample ID: AC59002
PO Number it
Date Received: 91/24/2019
Time Received: 08:20
Labwarke Loginl0 TASCEN401
Delivery Method Ocuuder
Fine/ Report Date: 228/19
Report Print Date: 02/2612019
Result/
Units
Method Analysis
♦.na w nemyre MUM/
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
CML
'.wwlller
LAB .
2.1
c
rererellW
vale
1/24/19
Vd11ucwa yr
MSWIFT
• Coliform, MF Fecal in liquid
' 1
M1C
1 BZ,QI
CFU/100mi
SM 9222 0-1997
124/19
ESTAFFORD1
Conform, MF Total in liquid
1
1 82,Q1
CFU/100m1
SM 9222 B-1997
1/24/19
ESTAFFORD1
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
•
•.0,02 ,_
NUT
0.02 U
mg/L es N
EPA353.2 REV 2
1/24/19
CGREEN
Bromide
0.4
•WET .
0.4 U
mg/L
EPA300.0 rev2.1
1/25/19
CGREEN
Chloride
1.0
6/
moA.
EPA300.0 rev2.1
1/25/19
CGREEN
Fluoride
0.4
DA U
mg/L
EPA 300.0 rev2.1
1/25/19
CGREEN
Sulfate
'2.0
2.0. U
mg/L
EPA300.0 rev2.1
1/25/19
CGREEN
Total Dissolved Solids in liquid
12 ,
321
mg/L
SM2540 C-1997
124119
CGREEN
Al by ICP
50
MET
60 U
ug/L
EPA200.7 Rev4.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORD1
As by ICPMS
2.0
2.0 U
ug/L
EPA200.8 Rev5.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORDI
Ca by ICP
0.10
96
mg/L
EPA200.7 Rev4.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORDI
Cr by ICPMS
5.0 '
5.0 U
ug/L
EPA200.8 Rev5.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORDI
Cu by ICPMS
2.0
15
ug/L
EPA200.3 Rev5.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORD1
Fe by ICP -.
50
1800
ug/L
EPA200.7 Rev4.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORD1
K by ICP
0.10
1.0
mg/L
EPA200.7 Rev4.4.
2/4/19
ESTAFFORD1
Mg by ICP
0.10
8.0
malt
EPA200.7 Rev4.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORD1
Mn by ICP
10
100
ug/I.
EPA200.7 Rev4.4
2/8/19
ESTAFFORDI
Na by ICP
0.10
. 6,0
mg/L
EPA2130.7 Rev4.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORD1
Ni by ICPMS
2.0
2.0 U
ug/L
EPA200.8 Rev5.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORDI
Pb by ICPMS
•2,0
3t1
ug/L
EPA200.5 Rev5.4
2/5/19
ESTAFFORDI
Zn by ICPMS
. 10:. , •;
17
ug/L
EPA200.9 Rev5.4
2/4/19
ESTAFFORDI
' WSS •ChemMry Laboratory,'1623 Mall Sarvlco Center, Raleigh, NC 27899.1623 (9191733-3988 .
'Not Detected" or "LP does not indicate the sample Is analyte free but that the analyte la not detected at or above the POL
Page 1 of 3

ArC ra11W1 La6omtorySectian etendta/Spiny& Conmmu/Qua4ifrer(Defrniions
Sample ID: AC69002
CAS #
Analvte Name
EQ4
Result/
Qualifier
Method
Units Reference
Analysis
Date validated by
Sample Comments
MIC:Total Colform82-Counts From all liters =0.
MIC:Total CoHerm-CI-Sample exceeded holding time prior to receipt at lab.
MIC:Fecal Cofform•B2-Counts from all filters = 0.
MIC:Fecal Conform -CM -Sample exceeded holding time prior to receipt at lab.
NCDEQ-WSS-Chemistry La Data Qualifiers
Al The reported value is an average, where at least one result is qualified with a "U°. The PQL Is used for the qualified result(S) to cat
B1 Coliform-Countable membranes with less than 20 colonies. Reported value is estimated or is a total of the counts on all filters repor
B2 Coliform-Counts from all filters were zero. Theyelue reported 'abased on the number of colonies per 100 ml that would have been
B3 Coliform-Countable membranes with more ihann80 or 80 colonies. The value reported is.calculated using the count from the smaller
B4 Coliform-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and <20. Reported value is estimated or is a total of the counts on all filters reported
B5 Coliform Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC). TNTC is generally defined as>150 colonies.
B6 Coliform-Estimated Value. Blank contamination evident.
B7 Coliform-Many non-coliform or non-enterococcus colonies or interfering non-coliform or non-enterococcus growth present. In this cc
BB1 MPN-No wells or tubes gave a positive reaction. Value based upon the appropriate MPN Index and reported as a less than'<° valu.
882 MPN-All wells or tubes gave positive reactions. Value based upon the MPN Index and reported as a greater than'>" value.
C Total residual chlorine was present in sample upon receipt in the laboratory; value is estimated.
G1 BOD-The dissolved oxygen (DO) depletion of the dilution water blank exceeded 0.2 mg/L.
G2 BOD-The bacterial seed controls did not meet the requirement of a DO depletion of at least 2.0 mg/Land/or a DO residual of at leaf
G3 BOD-No sample dilution met the requirement of a DO depletion of at least 2.0 mg/L and/or a DO residual of at least 1.0 mg/L.
G4 BOD-Evidence of toxicity. This Is generally characterized by a significant increase in the BOD value as the sample concentration de
G5 BOD-The.glucose/ glutamlc acid standard exceeded the range of 198 t 30.5 mg/L
G6 BOD-The calculated seed correction exceeded the range of D.6 to 1.0 mg/L.
G7 BOD-Less than 1 mg/L DO remained for all dilutions set. The reported value is an estimated greater than value and is calculated fin
G8 BOD-Oxygen usage is less than 2 mg/Lfor all dilutions set. The reported value is an estimated less than value and is calculated for
G9 BOD-The DO depletion of the dilution water blank produced a negative value.
Jt Surrogate recovery limits have been exceeded.
J2 The reported value failed to meet the established quality control criteria for either precision or accuracy.
MISS Chemistry Laboratory» 1629 Mall Service Cantor, aeloISh,NC 27699.1623 m0733.3900
"Not Detected" or'V" does not Indicate the sample is analyte free but that the anelyto is not detected at or above the PQL
Page 2 of.3

NC'D5M1(• Laboratory Section 4jrsufa/Sample Comments/QuaMerDentitons
Semple ID: AC59002
CAS # Analvte Name
P2 Result/
ua fier
Method
Reference
Analysis
Date Validated by
J3 The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination.
J4 The data is questionable because of improper laboratory or field protocols (e.g., composite sample was collected instead of grab, p
J5 Temperature limits exceeded (samples frozen ar >6°C) during transport or not verifiable (e.g., no temperature blank provided): non-
J6 The laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample: The data may not be accurate,
J7 This qualifier Is used to identify analyte concentration exceeding the upper calibration range of the analytical instrument/method. Th
J8 Temperature limits exceeded (samples frozen or >6°C) during storage, the data may not be accurate.
J9 The reported value is determined by a one -point estimation rather than against a regression equation. The estimated concentration
J10 Unidentified peak; estimated value.
J11 The reported value is determined by a one -point estimation rather than against a regression equation. The estimated concentration
J12 The calibration verification did not meet the calibration acceptance criterion for field parameters.
M Sample and duplicate results are "out of control": The sample Is non -homogenous (e.g., VOA soil). The reported value Is the lower'
N1 Presumptive evidence and estimated value: Ti ecomponent has been tentatively identified base on mass spectral library.
N2 There Is an Indication that the analyte is.preserit, butquality control requirements for confirmation were not met (i.e., presence of 2
N3 This code shall be used if the level is too low to permit accurate quantification, but the estimated concentration is less than the labo
N4 This code shall be used If the level Is too low to permit accurate quantification, but the estimated concentration is less than the labo
N5 The component has been tentatively identified based on a retention time standard.
Q1 Holding time exceeded prior to receipt by lab.
Q2. Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab.
P Elevated PQL° due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution.
S Not enough sample provided to prepare and/or analyze a method -required matrix spike (MS) and/or matrix spike duplicate (MSD).
U Indicates that the analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the reported practical quantitation limit'. The number value repot
X1 Sample not screened for this compound. _
X2 Sampled, but analysis lost or not performed -field error.
X3 Sampled, but analysis lost or not performed -lab error.
✓ Indicates the analyte was detected In both the sample and the associated method blank. Note: The value in the blank shall not be s
Y Elevated KW due to insufficient sample size.
Z1 Inability to analyze the sample.
Z2 Questions concerning data reliability.
U, J6 The laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample. The data may not be accurate.
UU Indicates that the analyte was not detected by a screen analysis. The number value was determined by a one -point estimation at tl
WSS Chemistry Loboratory>r1623'Mail service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-0e23 [phone]
"Not Detected- or 'U- does not indicate the_semple is enelyle free but that the enelyte is not detected at or above the PCL
Page 3 Of 3