Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0085359_staff comments_19950809DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY SECTION August 9,1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Bobby Blowe Construction Grants FROM: Steve W. Tedder SUBJECT: Proposed Twelverru�€Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Union County 201 Facilities Plan The Water Quality Section staff continue to have concerns with the proposed wastewater treatment plant discharge to Twelvemile Creek in Union County. As stated in previous memoranda dated September 16,1994 and February 20,1995, in order to issue an NPDRS permit for a discharge, the Division must find, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute §143-215.1(b)(2), that the proposed system is the practicable waste treatment and disposal alternative with the least adverse impact on the environment. Each successive report on the Union County proposed discharge has provided additional clarification on the need and the alternatives available to the County. However, the overriding issue of organized planning for wastewater needs remains unresolved. This is particularly of concern with the Twelvemile Creek proposed facility as a result of the proximity to the Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility District (CMUD) Six Mile Creek interceptor. As stated in the previous request for additional information on the CMUD alternative, full documentation from CMUD must be submitted to support the cost figures provided in the report. It is interesting to note that with each successive report the cost of this alternative continues to rise, but the requested documentation is not provided to support the figures. The lack of overall planning for growth and the subsequent wastewater disposal needs has been demonstrated numerous times. Examples date back several years and include: 1. The construction and operation of sewer collection projects without obtaining the required permits. This action overloaded the Dry Fork spray irrigation operation by a factor of greater than 2.5 times the permitted capacity and likely contributed to the current compliance problems at this facility (groundwater issues). 2. In 1993 meetings on the Crooked Creek wastewater treatment plant with staff, Union County officials indicated that the maximum need at this facility would not exceed 1.9 MGD at ultimate buildout. Since that time, the staff have received requests for speculative analyses for a discharge of up to 6 MGD. Additionally, part of the Twelvemile Creek proposal is to re-route some of this flow out of the Crooked Creek wastewater facilities. 3. Union County has also verbally committed to eliminating a series of existing small wastewater treatment plants to prevent proliferation of new facilities in the Six Mile Creek drainage basin through connection to the CMUD interceptor. However, the Water Quality staff have not been able to obtain any firm written commitment from the County. Staffs understanding is that CMUD has forwarded a proposal to Union County on the details for implementing an agreement on sewer service to the Union County Six Mile Creek drainage basin, to which there has been no official response. 4. In reviewing the various documents, Crooked Creek and Twelvemile Creek proposals, the staff continue to find what appear to be overlapping areas of service for the two wastewater treatment plants. Additionally, the issue of eliminating an existing grant funded wastewater treatment plant (Waxhaw spray system) that is properly functioning appears not to have been addressed. The amended 201 Facilities Plan does provide some of the additional information and more specific detail as requested in the previous memoranda. However, there are still inconsistencies in the numbers (the summary of numbers in worksheet 1 in the present worth analysis do not match the numbers in the calculation sheets for alternative 2) and missing information, such as not including the limit for Chronic Toxicity as recommended in the speculative limits and further mentioned in the 2/20/95 memorandum on the project, the documentation from CMUD, or documentation of the present worth calculations. The Water Quality Section acknowledges that significant growth is occurring in the western portion of Union County as a result of the proximity to the Charlotte -Mecklenburg area and concur that the County must develop plans to address the wastewater needs associated with that growth. However, unless an overall coordinated planning effort is undertaken, the staff is concerned that the most cost effective and environmentally sound alternative will not be implemented. The end result may be continued inefficiencies, higher wastewater disposal costs and detrimental water quality impacts. cc: A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. Rex Gleason, MRO Don Safrit Ruth Swanek Monica Swihart