20201377 Ver 1_PJD Packet 2021_20210701

June 4, 2021
Ms. April Norton
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Subject:
W
WILD LAND S
ENGINEERING
Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification
South Ellerbe Restoration (SAW-2o18-o1693)
Durham County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Norton:
A request for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) verification of potential jurisdictional features for the
subject project was originally submitted on behalf of the City of Durham Stormwater and Geospatial
Information Systems (GIS) Services, by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. in July 2018. A site visit was conducted with
Ross Sullivan of the USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office on November 2, 2018. No revisions were suggested
by Mr. Sullivan however he indicated the preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) would not be issued
ahead of any future permits. The PJD request packet has been updated with the Pre -Construction Notification
(PCN) to reflect minor revisions including:
1.) Updated project name from South Ellerbe Stormwater Restoration Project to South Ellerbe Restoration.
2.) Updated linear footage for South Ellerbe Tributary from 1,164 linear feet (LF) to 968 LF to address a
miscalculation in the original PJD submittal.
3.) Updated linear footage for the intermittent portion of UT2 from 155 LF to 142 LF to trim the feature to the
project specific area.
The following attachments are included with the revised PJD packet:
• Jurisdictional Request Form
• PJD Form
• Figures (Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Delineation, Soil, Parcel)
• Agent Authorization Forms
• Parcel Information & Durham County GIS Parcel Data
• Representative Site Photolog
• USACE Wetland Determination Forms & NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
Page 1

Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-332-7754 or at ieckardt®a wildlandseng.com should you have any
questions regarding this request for jurisdictional verification.
Sincerely,
Ian Eckardt, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw. usace. army. mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Multiple (Information Attached)
Durham, NC
Durham
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
Multiple (Information Attached)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Ian Eckardt
Mailing Address: 1430 South Mint St., Suite 104
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
Charlotte, NC 28203
704-332-7754 ext. 108
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Multiple (Information Attached)
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
a,. cktu-d 4-
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner 17 I Authorized Agents
—Cp-a g
Date
Ok,„„1.4-
S ignature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
ElI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
• I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other: Potential future construction of a stormwater restoration project
that would involve restoration and enhancement to aquatic resources.
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017
Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 1 0 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H.
REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.006622
Longitude: -78.903611
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
P rogram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Ian Eckardt, 1430 South Mint St. Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Durham City: Durham
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.006622
Long.: -78.903611
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Ellerbe Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
1. South
EllerbeCreek
Tributary
36.006022
-78.905095
968 LF
non -wetland waters
Section 404
2. UT1
36.007587
-78.903405
24 LF
non -wetland waters
Section 404
3. UT2-lower
36.007575
-78.903145
163 LF
non -wetland waters
Section 404
4.UT2-upper
36.007527
-78.902775
142 LF
non -wetland waters
Section 404
5. Wetland A
36.007575
-78.902824
0.01 AC
wetland waters
Section 404
6. Wetland B
36.007067
-78.902989
0.17 AC
wetland waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: GIS figures including Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Delineation,& Soils
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1.24,000 Scale & Northwest Durham quadrangle
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Durham County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
• Photographs: • Aerial (Name & Date): 2017 Aerial Photography on submittal Figures 3 & 4
or • Other (Name & Date): Representative site photos included with submittal.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determi nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
lan Eckardt
Digitally signed by Ian Eckardt
Date: 2018.05.24 10:21:30 -04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

S,rebor 5I
Depot
k Porree Cr
v,
Leon St
G8
U
S,u,v1 Ave
5psur4 Av°
Pe rseFrg :.; Q
7
'w,Isnh Sr r3
'J7u0CJrpw 51
2
n
ni.Jrl SI Y
WILDI.ANDS
5
2
r
Indian
Trail Park
Fusing 5R
!Valli 51
roar Ss
a
7
DOral
ire*
Risk.
F tit
2
U
Q
▪ 4Y Kmx 31
Klux
1 N
Green St
51 Hills rule k�lr
kn
ter' C g u kR,:a n tit
c Urban Ayr
perry tit '+�n �1r ❑ar, ran A'.c y +
7 fJr
- - r-r Duke hY , ns,Ah Ave Z•
C~
^r- - Vniwluly :.� 1" A e
herd's. AWE
` r'5 U J,..y
El+nn •IJI� �' �'�r `` Mirc n•a Ave ✓ '[ r Sir Park ... 7Wa'd.
c Darrwr.,+ Ya x;c r•1 "-r v_,
3fo -y _ Ghrkl Arc . ruha,c f
C G�
ril ' Park 5? 1
7:
rti, Vy-7dr,
Veaibwe
Park
;� Club Bi,d
4
11
Green Sr
Neringau.
Mal
■
Ilnl4kf �I
upl � N
f Y�
2 _ B
0302020104O3tr,,. sr
Clen,TLE ti!
Ire en S1
W frlrtkrxm Avr
5
z Lr. iwacd At•+
L e15r5
I Hydrologic Unit Code (12 digit)
Project Parcels
May rd Ave
Greglum AVC
ender Ave
3 N
2.
klcellrpaY
Perk
a
R oxbof o•S --
N
Hrrly 51
Helm moll r,
E Lavrnder Arc
R `m S
Y k
a
N L
01.td
vnson Are
'A1 0
Ye
A4r
1
Gk rd.e A
1 Cnrprwt icn Sr F
2 LYIIC 51
On
SI e
use
ii Cullum
' 4 .+ Conlral F3roi°w:l,. L.
�'h)y 1 �r Park •�r pnxd 51 Q
!;a . Hurd 51 rA
R,e ,7.; Rod 'ar Scnr,I Y n rrsy Ave rs
030300020601 f ` _ u r "nrsrrS1 =:
r•; ��1` w Morgan sr `va 64. _
—I i' '� `n 4r• alla •a Ale
�� - `�� � � Wx ` L Crnpnl Hill SI Q a 2 V J
N
r ♦, s
��'ek,+iv_ Durha l'1 _ �u GIIIDert 5!
� r.�,K _ Jackson SiS.1 N.9.4.. ` ! f r
7 _ '3
°M I. r, ' Z. .5
- y eW •Sr 12.
�Hon°way•SR
1• . it a `_
N }
Marl-.
- Parkcr St ▪ D ry •3 L•tr'" W.
re trap Ar_ Ie`r1a� 11J } S�
o. �� Curlew
Meuse Are 4 n h7r. re nerd Are Bully AIh►r ,
4 yr ,7)
l'1'-4.,, Park F
4, EPr1Cto1 Sr C C oa Av ° ` t.1
Lit 2.1
r
harry 5i " Cabo St v Forca,
C� ilan P.ik a t
y Ave a I �M SI n 0300602 r RS'"�
_T, Park •>09 .
P;rlrne' Sr E°od•Aye °
.�'� a a'rA c W" ,in,+,r 1 5 \ " ; \3'r't .5�
3.,�_ %r n .F W'' V % C�YtI,., o aq a -11,
r16t.
• • v f
We1� Si
.r• °
H PARS 5t a`
4
*, f
homer Sr
0
`? E Predm°ni Ave
'0 t nIelk:Se ti: E Fnlerptffie ,pr
E IJm5lean
2,000 Feet
Eav
Ervi
Park
3
us•7n•w.
Leep
Eva 5t Meade*
Park
Flslrklr' 5r
6
- r
2-
r0r.51
n,
Gk
e
3
kruper SI
5 d
x z
r r•.1..
4
SO,
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
South Ellerbe Restoration
City of Durham, NC

WTT.n1.ANDS
Ili ON11-1,
500 Feet
Northwest Durham USGS17.5iTopographic Quadrangle
Figure 2: USGSTopographic Map
South Ellerbe Restoration
City of Durham, NC

Parcels
Project Parcels
Review Area
11.1.1 w
Potential Non -Wetland Waters (Perennial)
Potential Non -Wetland Waters (Intermittent)
O Wetland Determination Data Points
Potential Wetland Waters • Stream Assessment Data Points
w
fir I. i 4,4%
v, UT2 - lower (163 LF) UT2 - upppr (142 LF); '7
d
0
z
op," Dairve
1
.411111},1 ■. u ... a • J. _... . .. } .. .1
7.10
• -
calif
44
UT1 (24 LF)
DP3 Ir
DP2
N,. . No channel
: or baseflow
:Wetland
: (0.01 AC
a -
*Wetland
;(0.17 AC
_ W-TinityAve —�
v. L ;T /
H A.
I, A D
20 7A'erial Photography
Pik
WILDI.ANDS
0
150 Feet
Figure 3: Delineation Map
South Ellerbe Restoration
City of Durham, NC

Parcels
Project Parcels
• 1. 1 .r
�i.i-
Review Area
///
Potential Wetland Waters
Potential Non -Wetland Waters (Perennial)
Potential Non -Wetland Waters (Intermittent)
0
Cc - Cartecay & Chewacla soils
Ch - Chewacla & Wehadkee soils
PfE - Pinkston fine sandy loam
Ur - Urban land
WwC - White Store -Urban land complex
Wetland Data Points
•
•
•
DP3
DP2
•
`No channel
: or baseflo
Wetla
= W Trinity Ave == /s.w.
2o17 Aerial w tography & Durham County Soil Survey
W1I.fI.ANDs
0
150 Feet
Figure 4: Soils Map
South Ellerbe Restoration
City of Durham, NC

Project Parcels
taPi
WILD IA NDS
0
150 Feet
' Dacian Ave.
Right Of Way E
Parcel Map
South Ellerbe Restoration
City of Durham, NC

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner or landowner representative identified below hereby authorizes Wildlands
Engineering, Inc. toact asthe agent in obtaining aJurisdictional Determination and/or necessary
permits/certification (401/404) related to the potential stormwater restoration project on the identified
parcel in Durham County, NC. As part of the authorization the landowner or representative authorize
access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc, the North Carolina Department of Environment Quality, and the US
Army Corps ofEngineers personnel for the evaluation nfthe property as it relates tothe project
including stream and wetland determinations and delineations,
Parcel 0:
Street Address:
Mailing Address:
Responsible Party:
Phone Number:
Signature:
Date:
0822-20-81-3502
815DacianAve. Durham, NCZ77Ol
Southern Repair Service, Inc,
Attn: Leah Bergman
PQBox 685
Durham, NCZ77UI

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner or landowner representative identified below hereby authorizes Wildlands
Engineering, Inc. to act as the agent in obtaining a Jurisdictional Determination and/or necessary
permits/certification (401/404) related to the potential stormwater restoration project on the identified
parcels in Durham County, NC. As part of the authorization the landowner or representative authorize
access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc, the North Carolina Department of Environment Quality, and the US
Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property as it relates to the project
including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID:
Street Address:
Mailing Address:
Responsible Party:
Phone Number:
Signature:
Date:
0822-20-81-4236 &
0822-20-81-4664
808 W. Trinity Ave Durham, NC 27701 &
815 Dacian Ave. Durham, NC 27701
City of Durham Public Works Department
Stormwater and GIS Services Division
101 City Hall Plaza
Suite 3100
Durham, NC 27701
Marvin G. Williams, Director of Public Works
919-560-4326
CAI /6, 2018

South Ellerbe Restoration — Parcel Information
Parcel Information:
PIN: 0822-20-81-4236
Street Address:
808 W. Trinity Ave.
Durham, NC 27701
Property Owner Information:
City of Durham
Property and Facility Management
101 City Hall Plaza
Durham, NC 27701
Parcel Information:
PIN: 0822-20-81-4664
Street Address:
815 Dacian Ave.
Durham, NC 27701
Property Owner Information:
City of Durham
Property and Facility Management
101 City Hall Plaza
Durham, NC 27701
Parcel Information:
PIN: 0822-20-81-3502
Street Address:
815 Dacian Ave. (Parcel has the same street address as the above parcel per online records)
Durham, NC 27701
Property Owner Information:
Southern Repair Service Inc.
2814 Chapel Hill Rd.
Durham, NC 27707

Durham County GIS Parcel Data

Detailed Parcels Report
814
Monday, October 16, 2017
920
4 92
918
916
912
91D
908
906
904
902
903
900
3
4
acian Ave
92
917
913
002
920
913
916
914
9
909
907
936
90
311
309
307
912
910
908
906
964
BC3
303
301
onmou3l Ave
3
95:3
921
919
917
915
913
911
9D9
9D7
905
711
26
504
920
918
910
906
904
927
too-
901
100ft
306
806
813
811
309
B07
804
325
802
803 /
Harper PI
714
712
8]0
815
610
W Trinity Ave
503 /0 i 935
929 - 9
4 1 4 0 t f
s32
* 4 4 It
4 t i **
i t i f4t ***
4 1 I 1 ir
r
a 1 3'4
A i
901
9D4
307
707
7
Z
M
701
721
732
733
g
BOD
322
324
Daclan Ave
322
320
318
316
314
312
Monmouth Ave
312
327
814
323
321
319
317 315
Old N
I]ethart
Tax Maps are not to be used to establish boundaries and/or
size. Use for such is soley the reponsibility of the user.
PIN
Acreage
Deed Book
Plat Book
Subdivision
Owner Name
Land Value
Total Value
0822-20-81-4236
9.12400000
007843
000136
N/A - NO SUBDIVISION
CITY OF DURHAM
$1,326,540.00
$3,244,474.00
Parcel ID
Land Use
Deed Page
Plat Page
Site Address
Owner Address
Building Value
Sale Price
105281
CMNTY SVC/ OTHER
HLTH FAC
000612
000141
808 W TRINITY AVE
PROP AND FACILITY
MGMT
101 CITY HALL PLZ
DURHAM , NC 27701
$1,917,934.00
$1,000,000.00

Detailed Parcels Report
Monday, October 16, 2017
0)7
9]t
_.--01.18.AN
08
90G
9)3
904
Monmouth Ave
2 1 811
3 4
309
307
BW
853
&JI
'57
975
0
503
A
50m
14 13
12
10
3
I1
4
5 8
3P0 R
to-
2
1n 11
51225
8 13
e09 7 14
G 15
3 18
4 17
3 1823
2 1522
1 2021
Harper PI
Tax Maps are not to be used to establish boundaries and/or
size. Use for such is soley the reponsibility of the user.
PIN
Acreage 0.02500000
Deed Book 02246
Plat Book 000136
Subdivision N/A - NO SUBDIVISION
Owner Name CITY OF DURHAM
0822-20-81-4664
Parcel ID
Land Use
Deed Page
105283
VACANT COMMUNITY
SERVICE
00701
Plat Page 000143
Site Address 815 DACIAN AVE
Owner Address PROP AND FACILITY
MGMT
101 CITY HALL PLZ
DURHAM , NC 27701
Land Value $100.00 Building Value $0.00
Total Value $100.00 Sale Price $0.00

Detailed Parcels Report
Monday, October 16, 2017
0)7
9)5
9)3
2 1 811
3 4
509
807
08
90G
904
Monmouth Ave
SW
303
&JI
'57
975
0
503
A
5am
14 13
12
3
I1
4
5 8
3P0 ft
0acian Ave
1011
51225
3 15
4 17
3 1823
2 1522
1 2021
Harper PI
Tax Maps are not to be used to establish boundaries and/or
size. Use for such is soley the reponsibility of the user.
PIN
Acreage
Deed Book
Plat Book
Subdivision
Owner Name
Land Value
Total Value
0822-20-81-3502
1.32300000
005575
000136
N/A - NO SUBDIVISION
SOUTHERN REPAIR
SERVICE INC
$288,000.00
$1, 025, 927.00
Parcel ID
Land Use
Deed Page
Plat Page
Site Address
Owner Address
Building Value
Sale Price
105282
COM/
APARTMENT -GARDEN
000914
000143
815 DACIAN AVE
2814 CHAPEL HILL RD
DURHAM , NC 27707
$737,927.00
$900,000.00

Representative Site Photographs

Photo 1- Plunge pool at the upstream end of South Ellerbe
Photo 2-Looking upstream along South Ellerbe Creek Tributary
Creek Tributary immediately east of North Duke Street.
below an existing greenway trail culvert crossing.
i
r.
u.
•
.'�e `,.,'r
1 '.fie'
.'
�•. .,'• fiw 6--
Photo 3- Looking upstream at UT1 where it emerges from a
Photo 4- Looking upstream along the lower portion of UT2.
stormwater pipe.
+}�
MliftigrA.
_ _ y y ' • - Sr_ ;?r ..Ys
Ti' _ �a !
are
-
%
...}ic' .• ..
- •r •.? f 1. y.v
•' _ a, A/
-y a ••Z 7.. -
... �..v,, 2: �, lit} `
F fir` H' -AO- .,. t¢. .. •!
ue
s. _ -
>ti
-~ lr� .. _ Sy yy-
�
T•--'F7';r. �."k .. ';a •,•
Photo 5- Looking downstream along the upper portion of UT2.
Photo 6- Representative upland in the vicinity of DP1.
Page 1

Photo 7- Wetland A.
Photo 9- Looking southward across fallow field towards
former Duke Fitness and Diet Center.
Photo 8- Wetland B
Photo 10-Former Duke Fitness and Diet Center to be
demolished as part of project.
Page 2

Stream & Wetland Forms
USACE Wetland Determination Forms
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: South Ellerbe Restoration City/County: Durham Sampling Date: 5/10/17
Applicant/Owner: City of Durham
State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 - Upland
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Wildlands Engineering Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: N 36.007149 Long: W -78.903796 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla & Wehadkee soils (Ch)
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No
Remarks:
Sampling point located in the right floodplain of South Ellerbe Creek Tributary. The area has surface
hydrology in the form of wracklines from out of bank events but no hydric soil indicators.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
✓
No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Only indicator is wrackline/drift deposits from large out of bank events.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1 - Upland
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Juglans nigra
Acer negundo
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Acer negundo
Elaegnus pungens
Ligustrum sinense
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
1 Viola sp.
2. Hedera helix
3. Toxicodendron radicans
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
50 Yes FACU
40 Yes FAC
90
= Total Cover
20 Yes FAC
20 Yes N/I
10 Yes FACU
50
= Total Cover
50 Yes Unknown
10 No FACU
10 No FAC
70
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 140 (A) 490 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Unable to identify the violet (viola sp.) to species therefore it's not factored into vegetation
evaluation. Remaining vegetation doesn't meet any hydrophytic vegetation indicator.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1 - Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0 - 4 7.5YR 3/3 100
4 - 14 10YR 3/3 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
silt loam
sandy loam
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: South Ell Restoration City/County: Durham Sampling Date: 5/10/17
Applicant/Owner: City of Durham
State: NC Sampling Point: °P2- Wetland a
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Wildlands Engineering Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): bench Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: N 36.007575 Long: W-78.902824 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: White Store - Urban land complex (WwC)
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ✓ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located on a small floodplain bench that abuts UT2. There is no canopy layer and
the area appears to be periodically maintained because it's located between a greenway trail and an
overhead electric easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns
✓ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
I
No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0-4
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Saturated soils were encountered in the first 4 inches.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP2 - Wetland A
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5' )
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Juncus effusus 60 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Lonicera japonica
60
= Total Cover
30 Yes FACU
30
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 90 (A) 240 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
D
Sampling Point:P2 - Wetland A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0 - 4 2.5Y 4/2 95
4 - 14 10YR 4/1 70
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
10YR 6/8 5 C PL sandy loam
5YR 4/6 30 C PL silt loam
Remarks
, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: South Ell Restoration City/County: Durham Sampling Date: 5/10/17
Applicant/Owner: City of Durham
State: NC Sampling Point: DP3 - Upland A
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Wildlands Engineering Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: N 36.007608 Long: W-78.902818 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: White Store - Urban land complex (WwC)
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ✓ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No
Remarks:
Sampling point located in a maintained overhead electric easement where vegetation is routinely
maintained.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
None.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
DP3 - Upland A
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5' )
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Rubus argutus 35 Yes FACU
2. Sorghum halepense 30 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Lonicera japonica
65
= Total Cover
35 Yes FACU
35
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species 100 x 4 = 400
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 100 (A) 400 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP3 - Upland A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0 - 5 7.5YR 3/3 100
5 - 14 7.5YR 5/4 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
loam
loam
, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: South Ell Restoration City/County: Durham Sampling Date: 5/10/17
Applicant/Owner: City of Durham
State: NC Sampling Point: DP4 - Wetland B
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Wildlands Engineering Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: N 36.007067 Long: W-78.902989 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla & Wehadkee soils (Ch)
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology 1 significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located along a feature that was likely constructed to deal with hillside seep. A majority of the
feature is confined to a linear swale that drains hydrology from the toe of slope immediately west of the greenway
trail. The feature drains hydrology to the northwest and ends at the upstream side of a greenway culvert. Beyond
the culvert there's a short section of dry rip rapped channel that connects to UT2.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) ✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 0-14
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Free water was present approximately 4" subsurface in boring. Standing water was present in
several portions of the overall feature but not at the sampling point. Hydrology gradually decreases
towards the northern end of the feature.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP4 - Wetland B
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Liquidambar styraciflua
Morella cerifera
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5' )
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
60 Yes FACW
20 Yes FAC
10 No FAC
90
= Total Cover
1 Juncus effusus 70 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
70
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
D
Sampling Point:P4 - Wetland B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0 - 6 10YR 4/2 70
6 - 14 10YR 5/1 70
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
7.5YR 4/6 30 C PL silt loam
7.5YR 4/6 30 C PL silty sand
, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: South Ellerbe Restoration
Applicant/Owner: City of Durham
City/County: Durham Sampling Date: 5/10/17
State: NC Sampling Point: DP5 - Upland B
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Wildlands Engineering Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: N 36.007072
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla & Wehadkee soils (Ch)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation ✓ Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Slope (%): 0
Long: W -78.903207 Datum:
NWI classification:
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Sampling point located in an old activity field that's no longer maintained.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
_ Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): -
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
None.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
DP5 - Upland B
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5' )
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
1 Festuca sp. 80 Yes FAC
2. Ranunculus sp. 20 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
100
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Unable to identify festuca and ranunculus to species level and assigned them both a facultative
wetland rating since species within these genus are found in both wetland and upland settings.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP5 - Upland B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0 - 14 10YR 4/3 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
loam
Remarks
, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5 - 10 _ , 4_.
Project/Site: South Ellerbe Restoration
Latitude: 36.006 on.al(
Evaluator: 1 , Fclr, .rd+
County: 0(.,,I,,,,..„„,
Longitude: l7 i,
(950et 5 p
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent HD,
if z 19 or perennial if z 30 `
Stream Determination (ci cle one
l-48_
Other SovAN aGr
e_g Quad Name:
t✓rt # `.
Ephemeral Intermittent( erennia)
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
()
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. rifle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
(3)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
(_2)
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
t; i)
10. Natural valley
0
4
0.5
1
(J )
11. Second or greater order channel
�
(i = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(()1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
11.)
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
©
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
U
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
0
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
C _
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
CO
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
[)
1.5
25. Algae
0
C:311
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other=
r)„n,.
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: !Nip-t- r.,,c.r,5 41,+2Yar,.+61 by I'L.k/A / Prelt,4 . Unclear , last. o-P &NA.C.ru5 rate/A
Wwktr q,.•►t.i or ;-C.re.00.44 r twf-1i 3n...f 4tv IALLI Ovk Mucral W�ain .V.,./r-viwot racaloA:7e3.
1
Sketch: L

NC DW Q Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ,j _ to - I4-
Evaluator: 7'. ‘Arc
Project'Site South Ellerbe Restoration
Latitude: 36D0' s am
County: Uvrhrt�v�
Total Points:
jtr=sn is at lust irt-rrnit'rt
ff> 1gcrcerennialifs30'
33
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent
Longitude: -34. 90140.5 %i
Other UT I
yg C'Jad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = f W )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Cont;nuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
d
2 Sinuosity of channel along tnalweg
I ©
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure.: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3)
5. Activetrelict floodplain
0
1
(
3
6. Depositional bar or benches
0
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvia? deposits
0
CD
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C.5
111. Second or greater order channel
CIO = )
Yes = 3
3rincial ditches are net rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = $,S' )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
`~ J
13. Iran oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
I
1.5
I
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris tines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence or high water table?
No = 0alb
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
C
2 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
0
2
1
0
20. P,lacrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
(')
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
()
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0_"
1 -
OBI_ = 1,5 Other)
1.5
„e,-,
26. Wetland pants in strearnbed FACW = 0.75,
'perennial streams mayeIso be identi'ed using other methods See 35 of manual_
/p_
r.1 Notes: rM 4.1t1 J .,., 0" .5 Y4,f4- s "},1cm.. 3'F' ei". .A..141 Is 4Li' -f . inn Wt r e- •
lac?, fs
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5_ It) I
South Ellerbe Restoration
Project/Site:
Latitude: o
36.1003..54s
Evaluator: I. 4,„c1.4-
County: purl, r.
Longitude: -fig, 903 it.15 0
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ? 19 or perennial if a. 30'
3 Li
5
Stream Determination (circle_one)
Ephemeral Intermittent'Perenniai
Other Ura. (I.)
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = r 3-- S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
CO
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
rpple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
CD
5. Active/relict floodpiain
0
1
(T
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
©
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1:9
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
( 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
ro = 0)
Yes = 3
3 artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrolocty (Subtotal = 9.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
CD
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
ol
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
(?es ="3.)
C. Biology (Subtotal = , 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
eta
1
2
3
22. Fish
{_"0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
(
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians cra's r �,.h crl•..,6 , , n;,;
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 n PAC
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual,
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5, 0 _ 1 .
Project/Site: South Ellerbe Restoraiton
Latitude: 36.00 -5;.4N
Evaluator: ,I, Fal arJ4-
County: 0 u r 44.0,
Longitude: - -g. C1024-45°1,6
Total Points: 02 r °
Stream is at least intermittent J
if 19 or perennial if? 30`
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral tntermitter3 Perennial
Other (J T („Fp,r)
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = IL1 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
13 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
1 i
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1Q
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
(2�
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
T
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
0
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
00
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
(T
10, Natural valley
0
CS.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
3 artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
8. Hydrology (Subtotal = L S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
O
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal
5
)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
10
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
?:)t
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
(
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
(0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = her 1.5 (Ot=
;
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: