Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0022187_Fact Sheet_20210611DEQ / DWR / NPDES EXPEDITED FACT SHEET - NPDES PERMIT RENEWAL NPDES Permit NC0022187 Joe R. Corporon, P.G., Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit 10Jun2021 Table 1 - Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name Motiva Enterprises, LLC / Motiva Charlotte - North Terminal Applicant Address 410 Tom Sadler Road, Charlotte 28214 Facility Address 410 Tom Sadler Road, Charlotte 28214 Permitted Flow (MGD) not limited Type of Waste 100% Industrial (petroleum bulk storage); stormwater/ groundwater remediation Facility Class PC-1 County Mecklenburg Permit Status Renewal Regional Office MRO Stream Characteristics Basin / Receiving Stream UT to Gum Branch Stream Classification WS-IV Stream Segment [11-120-5] Drainage basin Catawba Summer 7Q10 (cfs) 0 Subbasin 03-08-34 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0 Use Support No Data 30Q2 (cfs) 0 303(d) Listed No Average Flow (cfs) 0.0 State Grid F15SW IWC (%) 100% USGS Topo Quad Mt. Island Lake, NC Facility Summary Motiva Enterprises, LLC / Charlotte North Terminal (Motiva) is a minor discharger (<1 MGD) collecting and discharging stormwater as a component of its Surface -Water Pollution Prevention Plan. This plan manages stormwater in proximity to bulk -storage of petroleum hydrocarbons stored in aboveground storage tanks (ASTs). Motiva produces no products. This a storage terminal for gasoline, ethanol, and petroleum distillates. Facilities include ASTs exceeding one million gallons of various fuels servicing a fuel -truck loading rack. Significant changes to this facility are planned for permit renewal include the permittee's addition of discharge from a GW-REM system. Treatment facilities contributing to Outfall 001 consist of: • bermed secondary containment for ASTs; a detention pond including a discharge line fitted with hand -operated valve (normally closed) for combining stormwater and GW-REM effluent • oil/water separator and waste holding tank (truck -loading rack); residuals of holding tank hauled offsite for recycling • a groundwater remediation system (GW-REM) consisting of a dual -phase extraction system with carbon filtration; an intermittent discharge estimated not to exceed 1,000 gpd or 365,000 gallons per year. Receiving Stream - Discharge from WWTP for Outfall 001 is into an unnamed tributary to Gum Branch [Stream Segment 11-120-5]. The segment is not list in the 2018 North Carolina Integrated report or 303(d) list. Fact Sheet Renewal 2021 --NPDES Permit NC0022187 Page 1 Table 2 - ANNUAL FLOW (MGD) SUMMARY - Last 36 months Year Maximum Flow Minimum Flow Average Flow Number of Discharges 2018 0.4711 0.0020 0.1285 52 2019 0.6008 0.0019 0.2022 38 2020 0.9543 0.0012 0.3164 46 Table 3 - MONTHLY FLOWS (MGD) - Documentation of Highest Monthly Average (database Feb2018-Dec2020): Monthly Average Maximum flow reported = 0.6199 MGD [Dec2020]. DWR used this flow for reasonable potential analysis (RPA), as conservative in favor of the environment. (see RPA below). 2018 Maximum Flow Minimum Average Flow Number of Discharges Flow Per Month (episodic) Feb 0.1404 0.0144 0.0640 5 Mar 0.1868 0.0812 0.1329 4 Apr 0.2038 0.0271 0.0987 6 May 0.1555 0.0226 0.0768 7 Jun 0.1242 0.1101 0.1172 2 Jul 0.2018 0.0336 0.1109 3 Aug 0.2030 0.0417 0.1254 4 Sep 0.4711 0.0396 0.2555 4 Oct 0.2019 0.0020 0.1094 6 Nov 0.2025 0.0542 0.1212 6 Dec 0.3054 0.1644 0.2296 5 2019 Maximum Flow Minimum Flow Average Flow Number of Discharges Per Month (episodic) Jan 0.2713 0.1519 0.2150 3 Feb 0.3408 0.1748 0.2212 5 Mar 0.0065 0.0065 0.0065 1 Apr 0.6008 0.3843 0.4926 2 May 0.4352 0.1951 0.3290 3 Jun 0.2256 0.0019 0.1595 5 Jul 0.1129 0.0023 0.0700 4 Aug 0.2889 0.1461 0.1937 4 Sep 0.2175 0.2175 0.2175 1 Oct 0.3539 0.0062 0.1752 4 Nov 0.2256 0.0019 0.1304 3 Dec 0.4021 0.1928 0.2974 2 2020 Maximum Flow Minimum Flow Average Flow Number of Discharges Per Month (episodic) Jan 0.2944 0.2059 0.2564 4 Feb 0.5549 0.1133 0.2804 3 Mar 0.4188 0.0012 0.1698 4 Fact Sheet Renewal Jun2021 --NPDES NC0022187 Page 2 Apr 0.4941 0.1641 0.3147 4 May 0.3395 0.0962 0.2240 5 Jun 0.2524 0.0825 0.1429 3 Jul 0.4140 0.1375 0.2758 2 Aug 0.3195 0.0925 0.2262 5 Sep 0.6196 0.1944 0.4497 5 Oct 0.7950 0.2562 0.4832 4 Nov 0.3234 0.2178 0.2859 3 Dec 0.9543 0.1365 0.6199* 4 * highest monthly average for three years. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) - The Permittee's application to renew requests relaxing Quarterly monitoring to Annually. However, DWR has deemed annual WET testing insufficient to evaluate toxicity and has set Quarterly WET tests as a minimum frequency. Therefore, all permits statewide with annual testing will be converted to Quarterly at renewal. Motiva does not perform Chronic [TGP3B] (Ceriodaphnia dubia) typically required for groundwater remediation (GW-REM) wastestreams deemed complex and continuous. Motiva combines GW-REM with stormwater and manages its discharges as manually controlled, episodic. Consequently, DWR's Aquatic Toxicity Branch (ATB) continues to recommend an Acute Toxicity 24-hour static test (Ceriodaphnia dubia) Pass/Fail limited as a Quarterly grab sample, during the months of January, April, July, and October [see section A. (1.)]. This facility has passed all toxicity monitoring over the past eight years. Compliance History- BIMS has no record of permit violations for the period Jan2017 thru Feb2021. Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) - In accord with current permitting guidance, renewal conducted RPAs using the "highest monthly average flow" during the previous permit cycle. DWR considered this conservative to protect the surface -water environment. Motiva's highest monthly flow was reported in December 2020 as 0.6199 MGD (see Table 3). The Division used this flow for renewal RPA calculations. Based on analytical databases reported on DMRs for the past three (3) years (Feb2018-Dec2020), DWR conducted an RPA for BTEX [benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes], naphthalene, Total Recoverable Phenolics, Turbidity, and MTBE (See RPA summary). The parameters Total Manganese, Total Iron have no standard therefore were not included in the RPA, but because this facility discharges to a water supply (WS-IV), manganese monitoring will continue, no limit. Turbidity was evaluated for its potential to exceed 50NTU. It did not show reasonable potential, but because the maximum predicted [32 NTU] is greater than 50% of the allowable concentration, monitoring will continue Monthly, no limit. Renewal Summary - DWR updated the following: • Total Iron is no longer a parameter of concern (POC). Monitoring is hereby discontinued. • Total Manganese monitoring continues Monthly (limit removed) considering a discharge to waters classified Water Supply (WS-IV). Fact Sheet Renewal Jun2021 -- NPDES NC0022187 Page 3 • Turbidity removed limit; monitoring continues Monthly. • BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes) were not detected during the previous permit cycle, and data do not show reasonable potential (RP) to exceed respective surface water -quality standards. However, BTEX remain parameters of concern (POCs) for petroleum bulk storage facilities. Therefore, monitoring will continue but at a frequency reduced from Monthly to Quarterly. Benzene, however, is a carcinogen, here further evaluated for its potential to impact water supply (WS-IV). Its permit limit is hereby removed based on no RP but monitoring continues Monthly. • EPA Method 625 monitoring continues Semi -Annually as a spot check for additional POCs related to GW-REM. • MTBE — The Permittee discontinued using this fuel additive years back and therefore it may only appear in local discharges as a component of onsite GW-REM. Furthermore, the Permittee mixes its GW-REM discharges with ponded stormwater for episodic discharge. Finally, data do not show reasonable potential, therefore monitoring for MTBE is discontinued for permit renewal. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE Draft Permit to Public Notice: [Tentative] Permit Scheduled to Issue: [Tentative] Effective date If you have questions, email [joe.corporon@ncdenr.gov] Joe R. Co oron, P o ., NPD S Unit. 10Jun2021 March 9, 2021 June 10, 2021 July 1,2021 NPDES Implementation of Instream Dissolved Metals Standards — Freshwater Standards The NC 2007-2015 Water Quality Standard (WQS) Triennial Review was approved by the NC Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on November 13, 2014. The US EPA subsequently approved the WQS revisions on April 6, 2016, with some exceptions. Therefore, metal limits in draft permits out to public notice after April 6, 2016 must be calculated to protect the new standards - as approved. Fact Sheet Renewal Jun2021 -- NPDES NC0022187 Page 4 Table 1. NC Dissolved Metals Water Quality Standards/Aquatic Life Protection Parameter Acute FW, µg/1 (Dissolved) Chronic FW, µg/1 (Dissolved) Acute SW, µg/1 (Dissolved) Chronic SW, µg/1 (Dissolved) Arsenic 340 150 69 36 Beryllium 65 6.5 --- --- Cadmium Calculation Calculation 40 8.8 Chromium III Calculation Calculation --- --- Chromium VI 16 11 1100 50 Copper Calculation Calculation 4.8 3.1 Lead Calculation Calculation 210 8.1 Nickel Calculation Calculation 74 8.2 Silver Calculation 0.06 1.9 0.1 Zinc Calculation Calculation 90 81 Table 1 Notes: 1. FW= Freshwater, SW= Saltwater 2. Calculation = Hardness dependent standard 3. Only the aquatic life standards listed above are expressed in dissolved form. Aquatic life standards for Mercury and selenium are still expressed as Total Recoverable Metals due to bioaccumulative concerns (as are all human health standards for all metals). It is still necessary to evaluate total recoverable aquatic life and human health standards listed in 15A NCAC 2B.0200 (e.g., arsenic at 10 µg/1 for human health protection; cyanide at 5 µg/L and fluoride at 1.8 mg/L for aquatic life protection). Table 2. Dissolved Freshwater Standards for Hardness -Dependent Metals The Water Effects Ratio (WER) is equal to one unless determined otherwise under 15A NCAC 02B .0211 Subparagraph (11)(d) Metal NC Dissolved Standard, µg/1 Cadmium, Acute WER* {1.136672-[lnhardness](0.041838)} •e^{0.9151 [lnhardness]-3.1485} Cadmium, Acute Trout waters WER* {1.136672-[lnhardness](0.041838)} • e^ {0.9151 [In hardness]-3 .6236} Cadmium, Chronic WER* {1.101672-[lnhardness](0.041838)} •e^{0.7998[lnhardness]-4.4451} Chromium III, Acute WER* 0.316 • e^ {0.8190[ln hardness]+3 .7256 } Chromium III, Chronic WER* 0.860 • e^ {0.8190[ln hardness]+0 .6848 } Copper, Acute WER*0.960 • e^ {0.9422[ln hardness]-1.700 } Copper, Chronic WER* 0.960 • e^ {0.8545[ln hardness]-1.702 } Lead, Acute WER* {1.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)} • e^{1.273[ln hardness]-1.460} Lead, Chronic WER* {1.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)} • e^{1.273[ln hardness]-4.705} Nickel, Acute WER*0.998 • e^{0.8460[lnhardness]+2.255} Nickel, Chronic WER* 0.997 • e^ {0.8460[ln hardness]+0 .0584 } Silver, Acute WER* 0.85 • e^ {1 .7 2[1n hardness]-6.59 } Silver, Chronic Not applicable Zinc, Acute WER* 0.978 • e^ {0.8473[ln hardness]+0 .884} Zinc, Chronic WER* 0.9 86 • e^ {0.8473 [In hardness]+0.884} Fact Sheet Renewal Jun2021 -- NPDES NC0022187 Page 5 General Information on the Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) The RPA process itself did not change as the result of the new metals standards. However, application of the dissolved and hardness -dependent standards requires additional consideration in order to establish the numeric standard for each metal of concern of each individual discharge. The hardness -based standards require some knowledge of the effluent and instream (upstream) hardness and so must be calculated case -by -case for each discharge. Metals limits must be expressed as `total recoverable' metals in accordance with 40 CFR 122.45 (c). The discharge -specific standards must be converted to the equivalent total values for use in the RPA calculations. We will generally rely on default translator values developed for each metal (more on that below), but it is also possible to consider case -specific translators developed in accordance with established methodology. RPA Permitting Guidance/WQBELs for Hardness -Dependent Metals - Freshwater The RPA is designed to predict the maximum likely effluent concentrations for each metal of concern, based on recent effluent data, and calculate the allowable effluent concentrations, based on applicable standards and the critical low -flow values for the receiving stream. If the maximum predicted value is greater than the maximum allowed value (chronic or acute), the discharge has reasonable potential to exceed the standard, which warrants a permit limit in most cases. If monitoring for a particular pollutant indicates that the pollutant is not present (i.e. consistently below detection level), then the Division may remove the monitoring requirement in the reissued permit. 1. To perform a RPA on the Freshwater hardness -dependent metals the Permit Writer compiles the following information: • Critical low flow of the receiving stream, 7Q10 (the spreadsheet automatically calculates the 1Q10 using the formula 1Q10 = 0.843 (s7Q10, cfs) a993 • Effluent hardness and upstream hardness, site -specific data is preferred • Permitted flow • Receiving stream classification 2. In order to establish the numeric standard for each hardness -dependent metal of concern and for each individual discharge, the Permit Writer must first determine what effluent and instream (upstream) hardness values to use in the equations. The permit writer reviews DMR's, Effluent Pollutant Scans, and Toxicity Test results for any hardness data and contacts the Permittee to see if any additional data is available for instream hardness values, upstream of the discharge. If no hardness data is available, the permit writer may choose to do an initial evaluation using a default hardness of 25 mg/L (CaCO3 or (Ca + Mg)). Minimum and maximum limits on the hardness value used for water quality calculations are 25 mg/L and 400 mg/L, respectively. Fact Sheet Renewal Jun2021 -- NPDES NC0022187 Page 6 If the use of a default hardness value results in a hardness -dependent metal showing reasonable potential, the permit writer contacts the Permittee and requests 5 site -specific effluent and upstream hardness samples over a period of one week. The RPA is rerun using the new data. The overall hardness value used in the water quality calculations is calculated as follows: Combined Hardness (chronic) = (Permitted Flow, cfs *Avg. Effluent Hardness, mg/L) x (s7Q 10, cfs *Avg. Upstream Hardness, mg/L) (Permitted Flow, cfs + s7Q 10, cfs) The Combined Hardness for acute is the same but the calculation uses the 1 Q 10 flow. 3. The permit writer converts the numeric standard for each metal of concern to a total recoverable metal, using the EPA Default Partition Coefficients (DPCs) or site -specific translators, if any have been developed using federally approved methodology. EPA default partition coefficients or the "Fraction Dissolved" converts the value for dissolved metal at laboratory conditions to total recoverable metal at in -stream ambient conditions. This factor is calculatedusingthe linear p artition coefficients found in The Metals Translator: Guidance for Calculating a Total Recoverable PermitLimit from a Dissolved Criterion (EPA 823-B-96-007, June 1996) and the equation: Cai55 = 1 Crota1 1 + { Kpo] [sso+a)] [10-6] } Where: ss = in -stream suspended solids concentration [mg/1], minimum of 10 mg/L used, and Kpo and a =constants that express the equilibrium relationship between dissolved and adsorbed forms ofmetals. A list of constants used for ea chhardness-dependent metal can also be found in the RPAprogramundera sheet labeledDPCs. 4. The numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the default partition coefficient (or site -specific translator) to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient conditions. In some cases, where an EPA default partition coefficient translator does not exist (ie. silver), the dissolved numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the EPA conversion factor to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient conditions. This method presumes that the metal is dissolved to the same extent as it was during EPA's criteria development for metals. For more information on conversion factors see the June, 1996 EPA Translator Guidance Document. Fact Sheet Renewal Jun2021 -- NPDES NC0022187 Page 7 5. The RPA spreadsheet uses a mass balance equation to determine the total allowable concentration (permit limits) for each pollutant using the following equation: Ca = (s7Q 10 + Qw) (Cwqs) — (s7Q 10) (Cb) Qw Where: Ca = allowable effluent concentration (µg/L or mg/L) Cwqs = NC Water Quality Standard or federal criteria (µg/L or mg/L) Cb = background concentration: assume zero for all toxicants exceptNH3* (µg/L or mg/L) Qw = permitted effluent flow (cfs, match s7Q 10) s7Q 10 = summer low flow used to protect aquatic life from chronic toxicity and human health through the consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from noncarcinogens (cfs) * Discussions are on -going with EPA on how best to address background concentrations Flows other than s7Q10 may be incorporated as applicable: 1 Q 10 = used in the equation to protect aquatic life from acute toxicity QA = used in the equation to protect human health through the consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from carcinogens 30Q2 =used in the equation to protect aesthetic quality 6. The permit writer enters the most recent 2-3 years of effluent data for each pollutant of concern. Data entered must have b een taken within four and one-half years prior to the date of the permit application (40 CFR 122.21). The RPA spreadsheet estimates the 95th percentile upper concentration of each pollutant. The Predicted Max concentrations are compared to the Total allowable concentrations to determine if a permit limit is necessary. If the predicted max exceeds the acute or chronic Total allowable concentrations, the discharge is considered to show reasonable potential to violate the water quality standard, and a permit limit (Total allowable concentration) is included in the permit in accordance with the U.S. EPA Technical Support Document for Water Quality -Based Toxics Control published in 1991. 7. When appropriate, permit writers develop facility specific compliance schedules in accordance with the EPA Headquarters Memo dated May 10, 2007 from James Hanlon to Alexis Strauss on 40 CFR 122.47 Compliance Schedule Requirements. 8. The Total Chromium NC WQS was removed and replaced with trivalent chromium and hexavalent chromium Water Quality Standards. As a cost savings measure, total chromium data results may be used as a conservative surrogate in cases where there are no analytical results based on chromium III or VI. In these cases, the projected maximum concentration (95th %) for total chromium will be compared against water quality standards for chromium III and chromium VI. 9. Effluent hardness sampling and instream hardness sampling, upstream of the discharge, are inserted into all permits with facilities monitoring for hardness -dependent metals to ensure the accuracy of the permit limits and to build a more robust hardness dataset. Fact Sheet Renewal Jun2021 -- NPDES NC0022187 Page 8 10. Hardness and flow values used in the Reasonable Potential Analysis for this permit included: Parameter Value Comments (Data Source) Average Effluent Hardness (mg/L) [Total as, CaCO3 or (Ca+Mg)] N/A No RPA necessary Average Upstream Hardness (mg/L) [Total as, CaCO3 or (Ca+Mg)] N/A No RPA necessary 7Q10 summer (cfs) N/A No RPA necessary 1Q10 (cfs) N/A No RPA necessary Permitted Flow (MGD) N/A No RPA necessary Fact Sheet Renewal Jun2021 -- NPDES NC0022187 Page 9 ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary LINDA CULPEPPER D±rertor Motiva Enterprises, LLC. Attn: Scott Dilling, Complex Manager 410 Tom Sadler Rd Charlotte, NC 28214 Subject: Permit Renewal Application No. NC0022187 Paw Creek Terminal Mecklenburg County NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality December 16, 2019 Dear Applicant: The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the December 11, 2019 receipt of your permit renewal application and supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW permitting branch. Per G.S. 150E-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made. Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. The permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal of the permit. Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at: https://dea .nc.gov/perm its-reg u lations/perm it-g u ida nce/envi ron menta l-a ppl icatio n-tracker If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the links available within the Application Tracker. Sincerely, Wren Thedford Administrative Assistant Water Quality Permitting Section ec: Central Files w/application ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application D^� North Caro'lna Department of Environment& Quality I Dius+on of Water Resources Mooresv a Regxona Off,ce 1610 East Center Avenue, Su to 301 I Mooresv le, North Caron na 28115 704463-1699 December 3, 2019 Mr. John Hennessy NCDEQ / NPDES Permitting 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC RECEIVED DEC 11 2019 NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Application Motiva Enterprises, LLC — Charlotte North Terminal NPDES Permit No. NC0022187 Dear Mr. Hennessy: Motiva Enterprises LLC (Motiva) owns and operates the Charlotte North Terminal located at 410 Tom Sadler Road, Charlotte in Mecklenburg County, NC. This petroleum bulk storage and distribution facility discharges stormwater under NPDES Permit No. NC0022187 which will expire on June 30, 2020. Enclosed is a copy of the Permit Renewal Application Form — Short Form C — Minor Industrial, a flow diagram of the wastewater system, a map of the facility location and surrounding area, and effluent data for the last three years. There is no change at the facility since the 2015 permit renewal, and Motiva is respectfully making the following requests for this permit renewal: Reduce monitoring frequency for BTEX and Naphthalene Motiva is respectfully requesting reduced monitoring for BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene and Xylene) and Naphthalene based on the facility's exceptional performance for the past three years. All monitoring results for BTEX and Naphthalene were below the limits of detection (LOD) except for one sample of Benzene at 0.14 µg/L in the past three years. The statistics are as follows: 3-Year Average, ug/L 3-Year Max, ug/L # of Data Points Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Xylene Naphthalene <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 0.14 <5 <5 <5 <5 36 36 36 36 36 Based on the effluent data from past three years, Motiva requests that monitoring frequency for BTEX and Naphthalene be reduced to annually. Removal of MTBE monitoring requirement Motiva has stopped using MTBE as oxygenate in gasoline since 2010, and monitoring results from the past three years have shown below the limits of detection for 27 out of 36 samples, with an average value of 0.65 µg/L for MTBE. Currently the Division's recommended criteria for MTBE is 19 µg/L, and Motiva's effluent does not show any reasonable potential to exceed the surface water criteria. In addition, Motiva Enterprises LLC 410 Tom Sadler Road Charlotte, NC 28214 MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC Motiva has been actively monitoring MTBE in the groundwater wells and is not planning to use MTBE for future production and operation. Therefore, Motiva respectfully requests the monitoring requirement for MTBE be removed from the permit. Reduce monitoring frequency for Acute Toxicity Testing to Annually Motiva has passed all quarterly WET tests as required by the last permit renewal with no demonstration of toxicity. In accordance with the Division's 2005 Permitting Strategy for Petroleum Bulk -Storage, Motiva respectfully requests that monitoring frequency for Acute Toxicity Testing be reduced to annually. Thank you for your assistance in processing this renewal application. If you have any questions regarding the information provide, please contact Kristine Pelt, Environmental Coordinator at 919-616-5476 or email at kristine.pelt@motiva.com. Very truly yours, MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC D. Scott Dilling Complex Manager cc: K. Pelt, Motiva (electronic) File: 550-03 Motive Enterprises LLC 410 Tom Sadler Road Charlotte, NC 28214 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. Mail the complete application to: N. C. Department of Environment Quality Division of Water Resources / NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 NPDES Permit Number 1. Contact Information: Owner Name Facility Name Mailing Address City State / Zip Code Telephone Number Fax Number e-mail Address NC0022187 Please print or type. Motiva Enterprises LLC Motiva Enterprises - Charlotte North Terminal 410 Tom Sadler Road Charlotte NC, 28214 704-399-3301 scott.dilling@motiva.com 2. Location of facility producing discharge: Check here if same as above Street Address or State Road City State / Zip Code County 3. Operator Information: Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC) Name Motiva Enterprises LLC Mailing Address 410 Tom Sadler Road City Charlotte State / Zip Code NC, 28214 Telephone Number 704-399-3301 Fax Number 4. Ownership Status: Federal ❑ State ❑ Private ® Public ❑ Page 1 of 5 C-MI 10/08 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. 5. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code(s): 5171 6. Number of employees: 8 7. Describe the treatment system List all installed waste treatment components with capacities, describe the processes that generate wastewaters. If the space provided is not sufficient attach a separate sheet of paper with the system description. Stormwater from the loading rack flows to a 10,000 gallon in -ground SPCC tank. Water from the SPCC tank flows to the storage tank containment dike and commingles with storm water collected within the diked area. The water in the diked area is periodically transferred to the retention pond and is eventually discharged from the pond through Outfall 001 under operator supervision. Accumulated product in the SPCC tank is transferred off -site for recovery as needed. At times, groundwater from portions of the facility is remediated in place via air sparging or pumped through a carbon filtration system and discharged to the storage tank containment dike where it commingles with stormwater. (See Figure 1) 8. Is facility covered under federal effluent limitation guidelines? No ® Yes ❑ If yes, specify the category? N/A 9. Principal product(s) produced: No products are produced. The facility is a storage terminal for gasoline, ethanol and petroleum distillates. Principal raw material(s) consumed: N/A (the values provided below represent throughput of the facility) Briefly describe the manufacturing process(es): The facility is a distribution terminal for gasoline and petroleum distillates. It does not produce, manufacture, or consume products or raw materials. Gasoline and distillates are received via pipeline. Ethanol and other additives are received via tanker truck. All products are distributed via tanker truck through the terminal's truck loading rack. Page 2 of 5 C-MI 10/08 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. 10. Amount of principal product produced or raw material consumed List specific amounts consumed and/or units of production over the last three years Product Produced or Raw Material Consumed (AVERAGE) Product Produced or Raw Material Consumed (PEAK) per Day 660,000 gal (throughput) 1,100,000 gal (throughput) per Month 20,000,000 gal (throughput) 33,000,000 gal (throughput) per Year 240,000,000 gal (throughput) 400,000,000 gal (throughput) 11. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ❑ If intermittent: Varies with rainfall Days per week discharge occurs: 0 - 4 Intermittent Duration: 8 hours 12. Types of wastewater discharged to surface waters only Discharge Flow (GALLONS PER DAY) Sanitary - monthly average N/A Utility water, etc. - monthly average N/A Process water - monthly average N/A Stormwater - monthly average 20,000 gpd* Other -monthly average Explain: Groundwater remediation 1,750 gpd max when remediation system is operating, comingled with stormwater in diked area Monthly Average total discharge (all types) 20,000 gpd* *Note: Volume varies with rainfall, typical discharge is 8 hours, 2 - 4 days/month 13. Number of separate discharge points: 1 Outfall Identification number(s) 001 14. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including latitude and longitude): Unnamed tributary of Gum Branch in Catawba River Basin. See figure below for exact location and coordinates. Page3of5 C-MI 10/08 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. 15. Effluent Data [for new or proposed discharges] Provide data for the parameters listed. Temperature and pH shall be grab samples, for all other parameters 24-hour composite sampling shall be used. If more than one analysis is reported, report daily maximum and monthly average. If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum. NOTE: Permittees requesting renewal should complete the table ONLY for the parameters currentlu monitored. Summarize the past 3 hears of effluent data. Parameter Daily Maximum Monthly Average Units of Measurement Total Suspended Solids 19.55 9.2 mg/L Turbidity 32 13.4 NTU Oil and Grease 4.4 0.17 mg/L Benzene 0.14 < 1 µg/L Toluene < 5 < 1 µg/L Ethyl Benzene < 5 < 1 gg/L Xylene < 5 < 2 µg/L Total Recoverable Phenolics 14.1 0.78 gg/L Naphthalene < 5 < 1 µg/L MTBE 7.68 0.65 gg/L Iron 1,430 600 µg/L Manganese 310 93.5 µg/L 16. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications (check all that apply and provide permit numbers or check none if not applicable): Type Hazardous Waste (RCRA) UIC (SDWA) NPDES PSD (CAA) Non -attainment program Permit Number NCD00060500 N/A NC0022187 N/A N/A Type NESHAPS (CAA) Ocean Dumping (MPRSA) Permit Number 40 CFR 63 Subpart BBBBBB N/A Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CWA) N/A Other - Synthetic Minor Air Permit 18-083-689 17. List any chemicals that may be discharged (Please list and explain source and potential amounts.) None in addition to the compounds being analyzed. Note: Iron and Manganese are not present in the products stored on site and are naturally occurring in the soil and groundwater beneath the site. Page 4 of 5 C-MI 10/08 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. 18. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one) Yes El No 19. Applicant Certification I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. Scott Dilling Printed name of Person Signing Complex Manager Title Signature of applicant Date North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 ' provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.) Page 5 of 5 C-MI 10/08 Off Site Disposal Recovered Product Figure 1: Flow Diagram Motiva Enterprises LLC Charlotte North Terminal Loading Rack SPCC Tank Remediation System Groundwater Carbon Filtration Diked Area 1 Retention Pond Stormwater (Non -process) Outfalt 001 Unnamed Tributary of Gum Branch Motiva Enterprises, LLC Charlotte -North Terminal State Grid/Oust!: Ft SSW / Mi isbod Lake, NC permitted now; act limited 'Attitude 35° IC 59" N liantitude: 110.56IO W 'teething Stream: UT to Gum Branch Sub -Basin: 03 OS -34 Drainage Basis: Catawba River Basic Stream Claw WS-IV t North Motiva Enterprises, LLC Approximate Property Boundary Fia-u-iLe. Facility Location not to scale I NPDES Permit No. NC0022 I 87 L Mecklenburg County N O F+ 00 N O F+ N N O 1-, Q1 O Z T O O n D a fD (D N pq C C -0 d 3 3 o- 3 c< <= n a v a' S CD 6• S ,< r0 0, rD < O Z n) T ro O O -a D ro o, N fD O C C 73 ffl ✓, C 3 3 s 3 c< r3o <_ (+ d 6 a' ro 6 "' S < 0 fD ry < September October November December A Un U'i 1"' N ~' F-, A F' W W F' 1-, N ~ tD N 1'' I-, O dl 1.4 J w J 0l W <6.3 O W m sr; to A F-, W 1"' W LO W �-` O A �' lD • W 4.5 6.33 F'' A �+ to to A 1-, AAA 1-, 1--, - A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A F� A r A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A I-, A 1-, A I-, A A 1-, A F-, A F-, • O A A to A u1 A 1-, AAA F-, F-' F+ A F-' A F' A F, A 1-, A F-, A F-, A 1-, A 1 -` AA to F' A F-, A I--, A F- A 1-, A F-, A - A F- A F-, A I- A - A N I <5 A to A ti l A N A N A N A F-, A 1� A 1--� A 1-, A 1� A F+ 1• -+ 0O A F, ~ A In A 1� A N A 1-, A F-, A 1� A N 7.68 • W N 1--'N 00' N N Nw N O NJ A to A In A tr A to A to AA to to A to AAA to to to A to A to A to A to AAA to F-, - A 1 , A F-, A r A - A F, A r A 1-• A F, A 1-, A 1-, A to <5 A to A I_v A F-, A A A A A A A A A A lD I <3.9 <4 LD CO In A to A to A to A to <5 A to A to A to A 00 A to A In A In 3-' W A In A to A N N A N J A A 1-' A F+ O N A F+ O A A F-' O A A 1-_, O w A co lD (AI A co tD W A co to W A co Lo W A A cr.,o w A t' 0 A U A cn O A U' A U) O F-, A 1._, A ,_ t./'i F-• 00 O OO A t,-1 O A to O A Un O A VI O A to O A to O A to O A In A 01 AA t.n 1-, A 1-, AA 1-, F-, A r A 1-, A F, A 1-, A F-, <5 AA 1-, F-, A F-, A F-, A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A 1-, A F-, A F-, A 1-> A F-, <5 A to A 01 Q1 VI LD U.) I 4.09 N 1-.(-1,W 01 1--, N") 1-, J 01 I--` In in I--, I-, 01 I 7.38 3-,00 1-, Co . F-, V'� I--, 1-, 01 N N In 1-, Ql it, N 1-, A I 20.6 N N 1-, Si W N F-, 1-, A 1-, T ---1 ---1Co N N N O A to A to AA to W A W A W A W A W A W A W A W A W A to A N A N A NJ A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A In A In A In CO N W In CD 0 01 F+ Cr) to tD I✓ CO1-, W 1-, 00 01 00 CO W 844 702 A 1.0 N 668 421 VI t 0 CO 01 A 613.74 531.32 to 0 LID w A tD 1'' A A 520.92 426.86 593.03 N W Q1 602.7 522.1 A 0 N 427 N W 01 A N N 518 A CO N W 00 cn F, 0 t0 J Q0 O1 3-, N O 1-, to N N 1� 0o 38.9 I w A N A 1_, Ln A N O1 A 0 1� 01 to LO W 01 00 N 1� W O J CO 00 N 233.56 I to 1-, LID D1 W A p O1 T 00 J A In J W F-' Cr, 01 N tP �I O Cr, 20.9 N 01 Ol ~ 04 01 FA-+ (n 00 00 Z a r0 Appigml auanioi 00 O � 3 NC0022187 Charlotte North Terminal Effluent Data (9/2016 - 8/2019) NC0022187 Charlotte North Terminal Effluent Data (9/2016 - 8/2019) TSS ma/L Benzene ue/L EthylBen ue/L MTBE Napthale Oil-Grse Phen,TR Toluene /L /L L µg/L mg/L /L Turbidity NTU Xylene µg/L Iron µg/L Mn µg/L 2019 January February March April May June July August 6 <1 <1 1.34 <1 <4.1 <10.7 <1 10.7 <5 764 75.4 10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <4.1 <10.8 <1 14.7 <5 918 23.7 <5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <4.1 <10.6 <1 25.1 <5 1430 48.6 <5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <4.1 <11.9 <1 8.06 <5 827 77.7 15 <1 <1 <1 <1 <4.1 <10.6 <1 11.9 <5 952 67.1 8 <1 <1 <1 <1 <4.1 <12.5 <1 12 <5 467 310 7.8 <1 <1 <1 <1 <4 <10.5 <1 10.7 <2 246 138 6.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <3.9 <10.6 <1 6.58 <2 210 290 2016 Generic RPA (non -hardness dependent) - 95% Probability/95% Confidence MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58 REQUIRED DATA ENTRY Table 1. Project Information Facility Name WWTP/WTP Class NPDES Permit Outfall Flow, Qw (MGD) Receiving Stream Stream Class 7Q10s (cfs) 7Q1Ow (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) QA (cfs) 1Q10s (cfs) Data Source(s) ❑ CHECK TO APPLY MODEL ❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW Motiva Enterprises -North Terminal PC-1 NC0022187 001 0.6199 UT to Gum Creek WS-Iv 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.6199 MGD = highest Monthly Average flow (Dec2020) durning previous permit cycle [eDMRs]; used by RPA as conservative to protect the environment. Follow directions for data entry. In some cases a comment menu list the available choices or a dropdown menu will provide a list you may select from. Error message occur if data entry does not meet input criteria. Table 2. Parameters of Concern Par01 Par02 Par03 Par04 Par05 Par06 Par07 Par08 Par09 Par10 Par11 Par12 Par13 Par14 Par15 Par16 Par17 Par18 Par19 Par20 Par21 Par22 Name Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units Toluene NC 11 FW pg/L Benzene C 1.19 WS pg/L Ethylbenzene NC 97 FW pg/L Naphthalene NC 12 FW pg/L Xylene, mixture NC 670 FW pg/L Total Recoverable Phenolic NC 300 FW pg/L MTBE NC 19 WS pg/L 22187 NEW RPA 10Jun2021.xlsm, input 6/10/2021 MCCLATCHY excelerate Belleville News -Democrat Bellingham Herald Bradenton Herald Centre Daily Times Charlotte Observer Columbus Ledger•Enquirer Fresno Bee The Herald - Rock Hill Herald Sun - Durham Idaho Statesman Island Packet Kansas City Star Lexington Herald -Leader Merced Sun -Star Miami Herald/el Nuevo Herald Modesto Bet Raleigh News & Observer The Olympian Sacramento Bee Fort Worth Star Telegram The State -Columbia Sun Herald - Biloxi Sun News - Myrtle Beach The News Tribune - Tacoma The Telegraph • Macon San Luis Obispo Tribune Tri-City Herald Wichita Eagle AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Account # Order Number Identification Order PO Amount Cols Depth 28386 23459 Print Legal Ad - IPL0014352 $683.82 2 2.81 Attention: Wren Thedford NCDENR/DWQ/POINT SOURCE 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC 276991677 Publlc Magee t43Ti Cz inn Ereki rmenly Rli tvacmeni Cemmsrea- .k '6171W SeNkeCarter Rakich. NC 2760-617 Notice or Wert t to Issue a MACES MolNUCer Forma NCODI187 RM Crack Trnnita The Nat'l Cavne-a Envrcat-emll IAartike-sew Commaricel proposers b mire a NAVES wasNstmer dischn'Ste puma la the per WI*, ill c WO*. 5M-aiN1 Cam-smb rogueing tie peoposod permit ssil he accepted urti1.30 d:yo ear thr; pub rsh da72 or ills mogcc The Molnar of die NG D.4sixt al !Attu Resew:. es OW May hoe a pubic hoerhp st1QJd Ytes be a sipnl5.srt coatis or pubic irlerr_ Fiona mail Cam erta wet( intmufion 6041.1ost3 ac £ *R r3 the a6rwe aJdres. Yth3row' persons may visit the MIR al E12 N Stlisbu Sibet. Re gh r.G 276O4 m .sibs .nk no - on 1 ic. Add Iion:d Wormlike on 111,1DES pewits zed itis mike may Lie tourtd on cur n 1_ / ietgneacr ` i kakirrianhwale,feSe troes/rmcr- max.:AI:0cs' ksimasSNiMeal Tree npdcn•ressewaM7pulsk-rgtkiestrtyctli Pill 7C7•:6Y. Maw Eat,- proes, LLC • Cturkrae Nods Terminal. Mcciknbu-j Courm applied to rave NAVES pu^u jiGoon!ar, ire is J a;.c•Mvlcr pnlu'ior pre lee siesta-, eis:Aarpnp reread wermsvatcr. Mastendo and preurailikr l() Gun Btu -kb Cate River Base. Curren -it Turtiyl, Somme and 41tioa-ese arc oz. tvqualty Im hoe. TT a dntha e '9s, WWI ldure Naskkdd al octtcm in rig pollen a Gun Evincti. IR.00143r12 Mar 1420Q1 North Carolina } ss Mecklenburg County } Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly authorized to administer oaths affirmations, etc., personally appeared, being duly sworn or affirmed according to law, doth depose and say that he/she is a representative of The Charlotte Observer Publishing Company, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the State of Delaware, and publishing a newspaper known as The Charlotte Observer in the city of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg, and State of North Carolina and that as such he/she is familiar with the books, records, files, and business of said Corporation and by reference to the files of said publication, the attached advertisement was inserted. The following is correctly copied from the books and files of the aforesaid Corporation and Publication. No. of Insertions: 1 Beginning Issue of: 03/14/2021 Ending Issue of: 03/14/2021 In Testimony Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the 16th day of Apri1,2021 Notary Public in and for the state of Texas, residing in Dallas County STFmi scATT BEARD E,willtrii My Nofiiry 10 1317=51 Odobs1 23, 2022 Extra charge for lost or duplicate affidavits Legal document please do not destroy! Public Notice North Carolina Environmental Management Commission/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit NC0022187 Paw Creek Terminal The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to issue a NPDES wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) listed below. Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. The Director of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) may hold a public hearing should there be a significant degree of public interest. Please mail comments and/or information requests to DWR at the above address. Interested persons may visit the DWR at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 to review information on file. Additional information on NPDES permits and this notice may be found on our website: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water- resources-permits/wastewater-branch/npdes-wastewater/public-notices,or by calling (919) 707- 3601. Motiva Enterprises, LLC - Charlotte North Terminal, Mecklenburg County, applied to renew NPDES permit [NC0022187] for its surface -water pollution prevention system discharging treated stormwater, wastewater and groundwater to Gum Branch, Catawba River Basin. Currently Turbidity, Benzene and Manganese are water -quality limited. This discharge may affect future wasteload allocations in this portion of Gum Branch.