The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20211057 Ver 1_Pre-Filing Meeting Information_20210630 1 DID PROJECT SUFFER DAMAGE DURING HURRICANE FLORENCE? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET Let Date: 04/16/20 Return with Comments to Division by: October 14, 2018 PROJECT NO: B-4439 FIELD SCOPING MEETING DATE: October 25, 2018 DIVISION: 3 LOCATION: Brunswick 100 COUNTY: Brunswick ROUTE (US / NC / SR): SR 1342 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace Bridge No. 100 over Muddy Branch BRIDGE NO.: 100 TIER: Sub-regional MPO / RPO AREA: N/A MUNICIPALITY: N/A ATTENDEES NAME (PRINT) PHONE No E-MAIL DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Kevin G. Bowen 910-341-2000 kgbowen@ncdot.gov DIVISION BRIDGE MAINTENANCE Adam Britt 910-592-8168 atbritt@ncdot.gov X DIVISION MAINTENANCE ENGINEER Robert Vause 910-341-2000 rvause@ncdot.gov ASSISTANT DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Anthony Law 910-341-2000 awlaw@ncdot.gov X BRUNSWICK COUNTY MAINTENANCE ENGINEER Iris McCombs 910-754-6527 imccombs@ncdot.gov X RESIDENT ENGINEER Daniel Waugh 910-398-9100 dgwaugh@ncdot.gov X DIVISION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Katie Hite 910-341-2000 kehite@ncdot.gov DIVISION PROJECT MANAGER David Leonard 910-341-2000 dbleonard@ncdot.gov ASSISTANT BRIDGE PROGRAM MANAGER Monica DuVal 910-341-2000 mjduval@ncdot.gov X DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER Mason Herndon 910-341-2000 tmherndon@ncdot.gov X NCDOT - SMU Kristy Alford 919-707-6531 kalfrd@ncdot.gov X DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEER Lonny Sleeper 910-341-2000 lasleeper@ncdot.gov DIVISION UTILITY COORDINATOR Mike Brown 910-341-2000 jmbrown8@ncdot.gov X DIVISION UTILITY COORDINATOR Tim Godwin 910-341-2000 tggodwin@ncdot.gov X BRIDGE MAINTENANCE Frank Franda 910-470-3927 fsgranda@ncdot.gov X HYDRAULICS – EASTERN REGION Jon Moore 919-707-6738 jlmoore6@ncdot.gov X NCDWR Joanne Steenhuis 910-796-7306 Joanne.steenhuis@ncdenr.gov X 2 LOCATION AND SURVEYS REPRESENTATIVE Chris Sawyer 910-341-2280 cjsawyer@ncdot.gov X USACE Brad Shaver 910-251-4611 Brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil X GEOTECHNICAL UNIT Dean Argenbright 252-355-9054 dargenbright@ncdot.gov X PROJECT MANAGER CONSULTANT, HNTB James Byrd 919-424-0437 jabyrd@hntb.com X HYDRAULICS CONSULTANT, HNTB Matt Foster 919-424-0460 mfoter@hntb.com ROADWAY CONSULTANT, HNTB Roy Tellier 919-424-0428 rtellier@hntb.com X MA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC Robin Sobha 919-297-0220 ext. 130 rsobha@maec.com X MA ENGINERRING CONSULTANTS, INC Webb White 919-297-0220 Ext. 124 wwhite@maec.com ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT Robert Turnbull 919-617-9153 rturnbull@esinc.com X DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Stephen Lane 252-208-2808 Stephen.Lane@ncdenr.gov 3 DIVISION (COMPLETED BY DIVISION STAFF AND SENT WITH THE FSM LETTER) EXISTING FEATURES FEATURE BRIDGED: Muddy Branch (BRIDGE / CULVERT) LENGTH: 91’ DECK WIDTH (OUT TO OUT): 25.8’ WATER DEPTH: HEIGHT BED-TO-CROWN: PRIOR SURVEY DATE: 03/24/17 POSTED: SV 19 TTST: 22 STRUCTURE TYPE: Precast pre-stressed concrete channels with precast pre-stressed concrete caps on Timber piles SPAN TYPE: 1@30.5’, 1@30’, 1@30.5’ HISTORIC HIGH WATER (ELEV. TO THE TOP OF RAIL ): -L- BASE YEAR: 2013 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 350 % TRUCKS/DUALS: 6% -L- FUTURE YEAR: 2025 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 700 SUFFICIENCY RATING: 27.61 POSTED SPEED LIMIT IN PROJECT VICINITY: 55 MPH (ASSUMED) (MPH / STATUTORY 55MPH) DETOUR: OFF-SITE: Y ON-SITE: N STAGE CONSTRUCTION: N IF DETOUR IS OFF-SITE, PROVIDE DESCRIPTION OF DETOUR ROUTE: from bridge on SR 1342 to SR 1340 (Camp Branch NW) to NC 211 to SR 1343 Little Macedonia Road to SR 1342 (Makatoka Road) back to bridge NOTE– project is located within the Juniper Creek Game Lands B-5624 on NC 211 will be let at the same time as this bridge. They will have an onsite detour during construction. APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF DETOUR? 26 miles IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO ROAD ON DETOUR? COMMENTS: SR 1340 is currently being mill patched. SR 1343 is scheduled for 2019 resurfacing contract. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO BRIDGES ON DETOUR? ARE BRIDGES ON DETOUR CURRENTLY PROGRAMMED ON TIP? ARE THERE EMS, SCHOOL, OR BUSINESS ACCESS ISSUES? COMMENTS: The Brunswick County School’s transportation has major concerns with this bridge replacement. There are 2 buses that take 8 trips along this route each day. The proposed detour route will increase time to and from school. Brunswick County School’s transportation department asked that NCDOT contact them well in advance of closing the roads. EMS say the bridge replacement will have a low impact to their response time. ARE THERE ANY RAILROAD CROSSINGS ON DETOUR? No WILL RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT BE REQUIRED? N/A SHOULD WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION? No REASONS: EXISTING R/W WIDTH: 60' (Assumed) IMPACT RATING TO UTILITIES: POWER TRANSMISSION LINES: No AERIAL/UG/BOTH: No IN CONFLICT: TELEPHONE: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: YES IN CONFLICT: 811 called for telephone but there is No visible evidence that there is any line in the area of the bridge. MAEC confirm. CABLE TV: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: No IN CONFLICT: No FIBER OPTIC: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: WATER: IN CONFLICT: No 4 SEWER: IN CONFLICT: No NATURAL GAS: IN CONFLICT: No OTHER: IN CONFLICT: No BASED ON THE PAST HISTORY NEAR THIS PROJECT SITE, WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED TO COMPLETE UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS: 2 MONTHS WHICH UTILITIES WILL REQUIRE PERMITS FOR RELOCATION? WHAT TYPE PERMIT? WHO WILL BE OBTAINING PERMITS FOR UTILITY RELOCATION? IS THERE ANY FUTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN THE PROJECT AREA? IS A FEMA BUY-OUT PROPERTY BEING IMPACTED? TBD EXISTING UTILITY DRAWING ATTACHED? No WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE TEST HOLE? TBD HYDRAULICS (COMPLETED BY HYDRAULICS ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE FSM) WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A FEMA PERMIT? Yes; FEMA LDS IS THERE UNUSUAL SCOUR POTENTIAL? No IS PROTECTION NEEDED? N/A ARE BANKS STABLE? Yes IS PROTECTION NEEDED? No DOES STREAM CARRY APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF LARGE DEBRIS? Moderate WILL THE PLACEMENT OF BENTS IN THE WATER BE ALLOWED? Yes COMMENTS: Keep proposed bents out of thalweg. BRIDGE TO PIPE CANDIDATE? No COMMENTS: WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT? No HOW WILL ROADSIDE DRAINAGE AND / OR TREATMENT OF STORMWATER VIA THE BRIDGE DECK BE ADDRESSED FOR EACH QUADRANT? NE QUADRANT: SE QUADRANT: SW QUADRANT: NW QUADRANT: GEOTECHNICAL UNIT (COMPLETED BY GEOTECHNICAL UNIT PRIOR TO THE FSM) EXISTING FOUNDATION REPORTS? No IF SO, ATTACH. KNOWN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES IN AREA WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGN None ARE PERMITS NEEDED FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK AT SITE No COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL AND / OR VIBRATION SENSITIVE STRUCTURES NEAR BY No COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY KNOWN LANDFILLS AND / OR GEOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SITES AT OR WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE No COMMENTS: DEPTH OF WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK BELOW STREAMBED N/A ( FT. ) ARE ANY IMPACTS ANTCIPATED TO NATURAL SPRINGS OR ARTESIAN WELLS No COMMENTS: Boreholes will be sealed POSSIBLE FOUNDATION TYPE: Pile – Recommend bents be placed a minimum of 5 feet away from existing bents. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL (COMPLETED BY DEO STAFF PRIOR TO THE FSM) WETLANDS AT SITE? Yes COMMENTS: PJD_10/26/16_SAW-2016-02149 WETLAND MITIGATION? TBD RATIO? STREAM MITIGATION? TBD RATIO? KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN AREA? No COMMENTS: NRTR August 2016 & RCW Survey November 2016 AMERICAN ALLIGATOR HABITAT PRESENT – NO ALLIGATORS PRESENT WITHIN 1 MILE OF STUDY AREA. BUFFER REQUIREMENTS? None CAMA COUNTY: Yes PRIMARY NURSERY AREA: No DCM CLAIMING: MORATORIA: None IF YES-DURATION: COMMENTS: IS WATER FEATURE CLASSIFIED AS A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER? No COMMENTS: WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS PROJECT: C-SW STREAM ID# 15-7-2 WILL A COAST GUARD PERMIT BE REQUIRED? No COMMENTS: COMMENTS: An addendum to the NRTR will need to be done. 2019 re-evaluation needed. IS THE PROJECT SITE IN OR NEAR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: NATIONAL FOREST: No WILDLIFE REFUGE: JUNIPER CREEK GAME LAND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. NCDOT AND DESIGN FIRM SHOULD COORDINATE WITH NCWRC DURING THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT TO AVOID OR MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO THIS AREA. IS THE GAME LANDS CONSIDERED 4(F)? TBD STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL PARK: No AIRPORT: No A LAKE FOR RECREATION OR POWER GENERATION: No WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIR: No NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS: No PUBLIC USE BOAT RAMP: No CEMETARIES: No IS THIS BRIDGE IN A FEDERAL PROJECT AREA THAT IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 408 PERMISSIONS? No WILL A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION (FERC) PERMIT BE REQUIRED? No IS THE PROJECT AREA KNOWN FOR POTENTIAL INDIAN, COLONIAL, OR OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES? No KNOWN OR POTENTIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE AREA? None IS THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE ITSELF, OR ANY PART THEREOF, CONSIDERED HISTORIC? No WILL THE PROJECT IMPACT A CHURCH, COMMUNITY CENTER, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITY? No IS THIS PROJECT ON A STATEWIDE BICYCLE ROUTE OR A LOCAL NON-MARKED BICYCLE ROUTE? No IS THE CLEAR BANK (RIP RAP FREE) AREA OF 10’ BEING WAIVED? ANY CLARIFICATION OR COMMENTS ON ITEMS ABOVE: No deck drains should discharge directly into the stream. BRIDGE 100 IS LOCATED IN A PRIMARY DEDICATED NATURE PRESERVE, WHICH IS THE HIGHEST QUALITY AREA OF THE PRESERVE, AND THE AREA WHICH RECEIVES THE GREATEST PROTECTION. 6 CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ACCESS (DISCUSSED AT THE FSM BY DIVISION BRIDGE MANAGER) METHOD OF ACCESS: TOP-DOWN: YES MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT ACCESS TO SITE: Yes TRACTOR-TRAILER ACCESS: Yes BARGE ACCESS: No HEAVY EQUIPMENT ACCESS: Yes POSTED ROADS AND POSTED BRIDGES IN VICINITY THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESS? Yes ARE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AVAILABLE NEAR SITE? Yes ANY ANTICIPATED AREAS OF TEMPORARY SHORING REQUIRED? No ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ROADWAY (COMPLETED BY ROADWAY ENGINEER PRIOR TO FSM) ALIGNMENT: EXISTING HORIZONTAL: EXISTING VERTICAL: POSSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS: POSSIBLE DESIGN SPEED: 60mph (Statutory) POSSIBLE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: TBD COMMENTS: APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH: 500' NUMBER AND WIDTH OF LANES: 2 @ 11' SHOULD THIS PROJECT HAVE CURB AND GUTTER OR SHOULDER APPROACHES? SGB on Bridge Approaches COMMENTS: TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH: 6 (FT) PAVED SHOULDER WIDTH: 2 (FT) CLEAR ROADWAY ON STRUCTURE: 33’ OUT TO OUT STRUCTURE. BRIDGE WILL BE PERCHED AND SUPERED. CONCRETE FLUMES ON ALL FOUR CORNERS. CARRY CONCRETE TO THE TOE OF SLOPE. WILL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, BUSINESS ACCESS, -Y- LINES OR RAMPS NEED TO BE RELOCATED? No COMMENTS: THE ACCESS DRIVE TO THE GAME LANDS WILL NEED TO BE MAINTAINED. KEEP SLOPES OF THE PROJECT WITHIN THE R/W. ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED FOR CONSTRUCTION? TBD COMMENTS: ADDITIONAL R/W OR EASEMENTS MAY BE NEEDED FOR DRAINAGE OR FILL SLOPES ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED? No ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 7 ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED / RESOLVED AT FSM BY ATTENDEES ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED BY ROADWAY DESIGN (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) OFF-SITE DETOUR ON-SITE DETOUR NEW LOCATION CHECK ONE TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE) LIBR ATT G PROGRAMMATIC CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE) MINIMUM CRITERIA RULE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST THE OPTIMUM LET DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS: 04/16/2020 SURVEY LIMITS: POSSIBLE SUPERSTRUCTURE: TYPE: 21” Cored Slab Units NUMBER OF SPANS: 2 LENGTH OF SPANS: 1@45’AND 1@55’ TOTAL PROPOSED LENGTH: 100’ TOTAL PROPOSED WIDTH: 33’ OUT TO OUT BRIDGE SKEW: 90 ROW BY: CLA PERMITS: ESI/NCDOT METHOD OF CLEARING: Method III Modified SALVAGEABLE MATERIALS: None REMOVAL OF REMENANT ABUTMENTS / PIERS: Remove in entirety if possible DECK OVERLAY TYPE AWS APPROACH SLAB ON SKEW OR PERPENDICULAR: SHOULD PILES BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIAL: Yes VERIFY WITHIN THE LIMITS ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND/OR UNRESOLVED ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED: