820546_Inspection_20210628

efr-i:no GQ/<9,'/
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name: CI4 f2d O'Ct
Owner Name: /1,(2
hu
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Ira oi,iyn
Owner Email:
Phone:
Coun
Region:
_EEL
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
ON,e teal,
Title:
Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
24,1,4/
Certification Number: L?`y3
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
(Poo
0
Other
Design Current
Poultry Capacity . Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Fop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes_2r5o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesJ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes .'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 1)-(A,
Date of Inspection: £p /,9g//a)
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ' io ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes . 17'&o ❑ NA D NE
❑ Yes .,1244o ❑ NA ❑ NE
health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes , 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,f o ❑ NA ❑ NE
„D Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ,,Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs.
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s): ',
13. Soil Type(s):
Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
'47)-vcce4. 64ze/ad
✓�6:42,a6r2re---
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
❑ No
4,1?1"-No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Yes jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Other:
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued
Page 2 of 3

Facility Number: o-- - geito,
Date of Inspection: 1.9g
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes A?! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes _ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes alio ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document n Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes j2eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes jaNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,�` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 2r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ YesNo 0 NA ❑ NE
idditional recommendation
s as necessary).
i(ies&c:t P:sai ,6rAfrPrudli hr/4 itgedrai-e 4.�1
2.11 Vn
44/5'1'6e-et/ 71-zi ce67ad &I? .1e,.14,
114) 1°44
nee:) gay- •<
c..e 60Leiz-ee r s-4,t ice „ce4.,,,,6,ce,c_e.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
-11-0126611,0
Phone: 'PO
Date: ir/ Jc /c2
f
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015

FACILITY #: (Jp� Sz+/4 FARM NAME:
,/f-e4
FREEBOARD 79 ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE 9/ n hogv
ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL 6
OIC CARS.,,,PR NO
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES ,1 ��0- 4414
CROP TYPES
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE /0/ � , / NITROGEN LEVEL
/ l$5
EVERY 3 YEARS:
P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
DATE
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU 3 0
SOIL REPORT (#21)
V7/ d,//C?
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
IRR2 (#21)
ZONE ACRES PAN CROP TYPE //tiled
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Log
120 Min inspection initialed Weather Codes
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter
CALBRIATION (#24)

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS 6f0,.,; 0=
- FLOW RATES /%;:}
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT t--�
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
SLUDGE (#21 & 25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE
O:, / P: 5,- r % RATIO OF SLUDGE
RAIN BREAKER FORM
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
,
CROP YEILDS VMORTALITY 1��
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE