820183_Complinace Inspection_20210617

Facility Number
F)0,
Division of Water Resources �111)
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency & IC)
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: )6 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
(D. 11 h 2J
Farm Name: Li 0
Owner Name:
Arrival Time:
6-10
Llatt€ fmS
Departure Time:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: CU emt , , Title:
I:0a
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: amf
Region: -'fv
rU)
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: Re/Wge
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Dv
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dr v Poultry Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes 1--E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes "ELNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) El Yes . ')i,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I.71, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
_ lg
Date of Inspection: t.21
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
vL_ Ni
!9 I'(
ap, ag
Structure 3
Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes nNo
❑NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes\No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Eallo ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes'll No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1
El NA ❑NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.``)��``��
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window n Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (DtNJ1 I \'h- O-'Y go\I r�
13. Soil Type(s): NDfi 1 <) ()L) t6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
nWUP ❑Checklists n Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application n Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis n Soil Analysis n Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 7120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections n Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment`? El Yes No
❑ Yes
El Yes
El Yes
n Yes
n Yes
No
\ElNo
t.No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
El NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes \ELNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Other:
❑Yes No El NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: Cam` -
Date of Inspection: L • ii- Z-j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
n Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes c No 0 NA 0 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 11 No 0 NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NR No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
coil cUwaVs qve by 0-1ai1a1
wcqe 4fefl1ONi
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
finC5-t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of ' 3
,�.
t2 FOrrellOt
Phone: 1 1 Ko. T!Is
Date: Ce 11 Al
2/4/2015

FACILITY #:
Op
FARM NAME: l� u
FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVELS
PERMIT (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE NITROGEN LEVEL
SOIL REPORT (#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Note if 4 or Tess)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
IRR2 (#21)
C\AG
ZONE ACRE
S PAN CROP TYPE 1V\J ct1
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
120 Min inspection initialed Weather Codes
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter
1)24 27
7-7 j 21
CALBRIATION (#24)

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS
- FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
SLUDGE (#21 & 25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
RAIN BREAKER FORM
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE