Draft_I5987_PJD_Addendum_20210623_signed

ry
y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER J.ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 23,2021
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
ATTN:Liz Hair
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington,NC 28403
SUBJECT: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination(PJD)Package Addendum for: STIP No.1-5987,I-95
Widening in Robeson and Cumberland Counties,North Carolina.
Ms.Hair,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT)proposes the widening of I-95 from NC 211 in Robeson County
(Exit 20)to I-95 Business (Exit 40)in Cumberland County,North Carolina(STIP I-5987). NV5 Engineers and Consultants,
Inc. (NV5)),has been retained by NCDOT to provide environmental services,including stream and wetland delineations and
regulatory coordination for expansion areas associated with the design of the I-5987 project.
A PJD was issued on April 16, 2020 (SAW-2019-01276). An updated on-site determination letter from the Division of
Water Resources was issued on February 9, 2021 to correct an error of the misidentification of Long Branch (which was
actually Buckhorn Swamp)in the January 13,2020 letter.
Roadway design for the subject project has resulted in several areas of expansion along the project corridor. An addendum to
the jurisdictional determination request package with all supporting information for newly delineated features is attached for
your review. Insets have been provided for areas of expansion, where new features have been delineated. No insets are
provided if the expanded area did not include new features. Field work was conducted on June 7 and 8,2021 by NV5 staff.
Fifteen (15) potential jurisdictional features (5 streams, 5 tributaries, 5 wetlands and no ponds) were identified within the
study area expansion (1-5987 Addendum Waters Upload Table). United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) wetland
determination forms(wetland and upland)are included for each new potential jurisdictional wetland.
If you have any questions,require additional information,or would like to schedule a site visit,please contact me by phone at
[phone] or email at [e-mail]. This is a request for concurrence with our assessment. We appreciate your
assistance on this project.
Sincerely,
Gregory W.Price,PWS
Division Environmental Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Cc: Robert Patterson,NCDWR
Mailing Address: Telephone:[phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 500 TRANSPORTATION DRIVE
DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT FAYETTEVILLE,NC 28301
PO BOX 1150 Website:www.ncdot.gov
FAYETTEVILLE,NC 28302

Jurisdictional Determination Request
rr
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination(JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPennitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1-5987
City, State: Saint Pauls, NC
County: Cumberland and Robeson
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): N/A
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: NV5 Enqineers and Consultants, Inc.
Mailing Address: 3300 Regency Parkway #100
Cary, NC 27518
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: NCDOT Division 6 - Greg Price
Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 1150
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
171 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination(PJD)provides an indication that there may
be"waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional"waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination(AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional"waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
W1Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1 ,795 acres.
❑ The property boundary(or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑� Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 34.80138
Longitude: -78.99049
❑✓ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
aCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form and include the
Aquatic resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
✓❑ Vicinity Map
✓❑ Aerial Photograph
✓❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
✓❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑� NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_APp_A_Prelim_JD_Form_611able.pdf
' Please see htip://www.saw.usace.ariny.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project areasubjectto federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law.Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Greg Price,NCDOT Division 6 DEO,P.O.Box 1150,Fayetteville,NC 28302
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: STIP Proj. No.: 1-5987 (SAW-2019-01276)
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cumberland/Robeson city: St. Pauls
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.80138 Long.: -78.99049
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83 US Feet
Name of nearest waterbody: Big Marsh Swamp, Little Marsh Swamp, Tenmile Swamp
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 101404)
See Attached

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑E Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑E U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24 K:Hope Mills,St.Pauls,Rennert,NW&NE Lumberton
❑m Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: U.S Dept otAg,,9aa Cumberland Co.&'9'$Robeson Co.
0 National wetlands Inventory map(s). Cite name: U.S. Fish and Wildlife, National Wetlands Inventory, Latest
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): NC Onemap Orthoimagery- Latest
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determi nation(s). File no. and date of response letter:
0-1
Other information (please Specify): NC Div. of Emergency Management, Quality Level 2 (QL2) LiDAR Data
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
6/23/2021
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame,the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

1-5987 Addendum Stream Delineations
NCDWQ On JD Review
Map ID Classification Topo Comments Date Reviewer Figure Number
Score
Ma
Cowpen Branch >30 Perennial Yes Extension 2G, 2H, 21, 3G, 3H, 31
Mercer Branch >30 Perennial Yes Extension 2M, 3M
SR <30 Intermittent No Extension 2K, 3K
SAA < 30 Intermittent Yes New 2L, 3L
SAB <30 Intermittent Yes New 21-1,31-1
TJ N/A Tributary No I Extension 2L, 3L
TM N/A Tributary No Extension 2K, 3K
TAB N/A Tributary No New;juts slightly into Original PSA 2E, 3E
TAC N/A Tributary No New 2L, 3L
TAD N/A Tributary No New;juts slightly into Original PSA; connects to SAB 21-1,31-1

1-5987 Addendum Wetland Delineations
Map ID Acres NCWAM Classification Comments JD Review Date Reviewers Figure
Number
WE 1.24 Bottomland Hardwood Extended 2M, 3M
WF 6.99 Floodplain Pool Extended 2K, 2L, 3K, 3L
WAD 0.05 Headwater Forest New; pond and roadside influence 2D, 3D
WAE 0.01 Headwater Forest New; under powerline w/mote on other side 21), 3D
New; small portion juts slightly into Original PSA;
WAF 0.43 Headwater Forest 2K, 3K
connects to TM and SR

1-5987 Addendum Pond Delineations
On Topo On Soils Figure
Map p Number
Map ID Acres Ma Comments JD Review Date Reviewers
Note: No ponds were found in the expansion areas.

1-5987 Addendum Waters Upload
Cowardin Area Waters Latitude Longitude
Waters Name Code HGM Code (acres) Linear(ft) Types (NAD83) (NAD83) Local Waterway Figure Number
Cowpen Branch R21JB3 RIVERINE 848.44 RPW 34.743360 -78.99774 Tenmile Swamp 2G, 2H, 21, 3G, 3H, 31
Mercer Branch R21JB3 RIVERINE 297.10 RPW 34.827230 -78.98249 Little Marsh Swamp 2M, 3M
SR R2UB3 RIVERINE 177.08 RPW 34.790150 -78.99409 Mercer Branch 2K, 3K
SAA R21JB3 RIVERINE 690.56 RPW 34.810033 -78.981846 Tenmile Swamp 2L, 3L
SAB R2UB3 RIVERINE 526.45 RPW 34.753846 -78.995160 Cowpen Branch 21-1,31-1
TJ R2SB5 RIVERINE 508.03 NRPW 34.804500 -78.989580 Tenmile Swamp 2L, 3L
TM R4SB5 RIVERINE 84.92 NRPW 34.788540 -78.994240 Tenmile Swamp 2K, 3K
TAB R4SB6 RIVERINE 31.33 NRPW 34.701511 -78.998731 Tenmile Swamp 2E, 3E
TAC R4SB7 RIVERINE 187.96 NRPW 34.810439 -78.983222 Tenmile Swamp 2L, 3L
TAD R4SB8 RIVERINE 230.85 NRPW 34.753808 -78.996463 Cowpen Branch 21-1,31-1
WE PFO1 RIVERINE 1.24 RPWWD 34.827230 -78.982557 Mercer Branch 2M, 3M
WF PFO1 RIVERINE 6.99 RPWWD 34.802044 -78.990262 Big Marsh Swamp 2K, 2L, 3K, 3L
WAD PFO1 MINSOILFLT 0.05 RPWWN 34.686919 -78.999878 Tenmile Swamp 2D, 3D
WAE PFO1 MINSOILFLT 0.01 RPWWN 34.689874 -78.998857 Tenmile Swamp 2D, 3D
WAF PFO1 RIVERINE 0.43 RPWWD 34.789313 -78.993927 Mercer Branch 2K, 3K
Note: Lengths reported as totals, combining what was found within the Original and the Expanded Project Study Areas.

S R 10031 - - - -
deg Rd� 53
�43 v � f � f
Arabia RdlsR 1003) C
^z `9
* Qr
\. QD ,
20 \ rw
/ c
Ct
N
\ _ �•R1i
Qek CUMBERLAND
BLADEN
O'
S
+�la
r
sli SH,a� -
�'`r -oMa
rsh Church Rcr I� / 20 --
.�
� a
y1 a, in
SW amP .i
_ 1
72 ��a� 301 de l
SR 10a�, + �
Y �
.�a
13
1
i\
Study Area
/ '�• I 41
3 1.5 0 3
_ 1 inch=3 miles
74 ^r„� ♦ source:NCDOT,NCDEQ,CALYX Engineers and Consultants
II Figure Date:10/2at2019
� � i m d��•-�`k
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
j Fay e-' ' DIVISION 6
"'3'.• cgs A
AMwn.,e`
o, a 1-95 Widening from
US 301 (Exit 22)in Robeson County to
1-95 Business(Exit 40)in Cumberland County.
Robeson anda �R STIP Project 1-5987
Cumberland Counties =M Robeson and Cumberland Counties
am
,e. Figure 1 - Project Vicinity

--•'_ -' - '\ _--
�' `- 4-V Y.. ('r' t `�•_ _t•--F•` ' •` ,r �♦- ~J y _ 'G - 1 -�►. - f:o,:�J 1 '.,r� •
`� ` �♦-- •J ` - �.� "of - .'• --_ � ''� �
Sandy Gaw
1- � � __ __ 1 -- •,�' . � �._-�.,+�. �• �\ �} 1 �-`tit/
s
, uaarkton�Quad _.Hope MillsMillsQua reed' /
rot I
fJ
00
Rqv
_ 1 La+n�o+• — - -
_ ./
l= �•'�! _)� � '1 -III
At-
AL 46001
Re .
4_ Rennert Quad -_..- �� 1 Sa�ntPauls Quad _ uart Quad 1,
- V �, ,-low-
rr li // ►. "� 1 t
04
ot
if
Aft- C
IT
--- '
•4 •7 ` �&4 ` 1 1 ,
1 ' ~ It
ti 1
5 '
'• � �l' { _ - �� � •' �^ '� Q' ` - Ire •1�•► '�' j- — '�,i j i
1 i 1
jolt
to
Vp
_ ►I .d ,
401
40 Vic
ob-
tic
`a wr 1
Northwest Lumberton`Q d uad I = �- Northeast Lumberton Qua _ _ 'K11�"'rt Tar Heel_Quad _
,'f '� I - , �' r 'r• t OF pi0A731 C-4>
-' �'� _ ,l .• �--.- -�_ ,•j '�--- -'s; �� .� - `'- _ �~��� pay NORTH CAROLI NA
�; I 1 _ -• I , b DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
rton. -j' 1 ° r i 71 DIVISION 6
j I ` -- Imo' � J
let-
1-95 Widening from
US 301 in Robeson County(Exit 22)to
1-95 Business(Exit 40)in Cumberland County.
Study Area
Vmaipg"�"• i� ``r•~
2.5 1.25 0 2.5 -' V .;:r __- STI P Project 1-5987
Miles Sout heast.Lumberton Quad Robeson and Cumberland Counties
_ -
1 inch equals 2.5 miles _ Y r
- "''"_
Source:ESRI,CALYX Engineers and Consultants 'jam __�_•'-' __ __ _
Topography Map
Figure Date:1/18/2019 ���. --F �, ,ukrCOp
0

y,S V!,7
ra
av
aa `!
,i -
v
1
r ..� ;..
4. r
-
N
x' Is). _ ! _I `9 • • �. - "tip.. ! -
Vie, '�,� �'f'1 J O .�� -\ A S_ ,g. • � _�?.! /
•
_ r
j
,myµ !r�R•. y � +..
301
a - t+
Ti
t .
! •s
� _ a
J
e r
at�.: �� - fie , • /r Ro a
�; r,J
et .
Fay to
x
4111
�-
'
r .
i
k
'� ;• ��F m� o N r
,d�. > � : .�.'�• Y - i- r` f .'ilt f �y \\ 92 , `` _�„ :wit.
„
y
r`
v/
s '1
1 i N 1r
r�
tom►" s'
�• k
A t :.a
_ Al—
_✓" \ j \
r
�x
y`♦O<NORIN G90/i
Map Index Interstate Municipal Boundary '� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT I-95 Widening from
" OF TRANSPORTATION US 301 in Robeson County(Exit 22)to
Study Area US Route L_—_J County Boundary �,4�rorR^ s DIVISION 6 1-95 Business(Exit 40)in Cumberland County.
NC Route STIP Project 1-5987
1.5 0.75 0 1.5 Miles QD
Robeson and Cumberland Counties
Major Road
1 inch=1.5 miles
Local Road Figure 2 - Field Verification Index
Source:NCDOT,NCOneMap,CALYX Engineers and Consultants Figure Date:0/1&2021 g

> Legend
1 7 PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
� ul,
ti'. ti, } Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
3;r t� .a:' a•°�` "��y r ,^ '• �r>. � .; Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
°. �S� Princ�efon
Data Points
w
et
A,.
Field Visits
j �'° y Berkley Ln Manchester Ln Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, Levan, Hall
n,T.d B
Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
Mull ✓ and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
f. =, October 14,2019.
' •• -- June 7-8,2021
- FIGURE
2A
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
�;� .s ,' * , � ► F •<'� , TtTI �g in Robeson County (Exit 20)
h si
7,-e'. to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
�V'U.�- �~ ., �' ��e in Cumberland County
ku
TIP Project 1-5987
®_, �' f } �,� Robeson and
obemo +° _ ,.
.yea 1`y _
TT
c 1 �., umberland Counties, NC
x
�►, g ,` - ¢FRd w: - ,. Map Date:06/17/2021
' 'tery'47
, r f•L'. 1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Vann p� ,
Feet
c
; , Thls Ezhlblt' f pl g purposes only and'f t h n hereon does not
,- ` meet The Sta d d f P ce for
r Land Saurvyg- N rth Carolina(21 NCAC
r 56 1600) Th E h-b' omp led from va'I bl f t n obta n,d hom the
P `\� ces I'sted below.St e....
ms and Well-, All fe t tetl n Ne field were
J ,,,d,d ullng a mappng grade Tnmble GeoXT or G-W00 GPS race ver Wth
tl - opposed"b_"teraccumcy
�7 �
* -ra ' • - ~
Cr1Ci<ieV�/pGC� �} Sources NCDOT NV S Engineers.Consultants(formerly Calyz)
yC !!•~ ( Aedal Photography:NC DOT
y .` AN

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
St a.also
Y Intermittent Stream
.• yr A- -. —�^— Tributary Waters of US
I' ar
Wetland
., .-
Tr ht-J i� 2 Ponds
Data Points
0 Wet
to
Field Visits
. _ AAI.�s[Si
Manchester Ln �v - - Crew:
` .r
Q .. ..w'rIV`���` -1-" 'a �' "y�k1 r �tl .
/4 7 Y j - - ' �y Merritt,T. Fox M. DesChamps O -
�• - _V* 1 ., J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
Jill
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
.PY
October 14,2019.
s June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
Kahn Rd (SR 1792�) - y -
2 B
1111tA
1 Ik
1 -
it
13
.i Field Verification Map
t �?7
,W • +N �92 "' '�, �� I-95 Widening from NC 211
rt '� �. ..,,, j F' .,,I,��yNN '.•', A _ Jac ` r in Robeson County (Exit 20)
,,.i.,, r , �_ to I-95 Business (Exit40)
in Cumberland County
-b a
r1 � I
\ .p -
\ i0 . '- r .. < TIP Project I-5987
„A �,
/� f/.® ` - - . u _ s A,' �:,.?..: ,,,�•i, ,'e� • k` - ; �� w�ntergreer Robeson and
�d
Cumberland Counties NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
co
SS � - Walnut Cove Dr - � (D `� E .,
"6 , aE''';+ , , w,� ,�. , '' �1 �- • ' 1 inch = 400 feet
CD A
li 1 CDR .} , ,r
r - �. ;' y, •. J 4 - _>, GRAPHIC SCALE
... el
a� 0 200 400 800
r �
Feet
She • ' :.� ��. ., `' �+w`j��
�( _� y - �• '•1� — — #>..l l `{-- '0 Th' Exh'b' nnng t-s for plai purposes only and'f , h reon n he does not
1 ✓ Y • 1� .j .y.•• ; meet TM1e S,a d d f P ctce for Land Sur-y g-11 N r,h Carol na(21 NCAC
6U,fi00) Th.E M1 sm ham ava l bl f a ob, the
es I's,Th b 51 nd fi antl Wetlantls.All t ate loctl n tl,e field,ld were
_ # �� �~f \• .- y ?fin:. +r� cordetl us,g a mapping gad,Tnmble GeoXT or G-W00 GPS rece ver with
w,ppeaedsnb meteraoenaoy
g ,
> �� Sources-NCDOT.NVS Engineers+Consultants(formerly Calyx)
I
• 1a,•�' ,� `Y '�`' Aeral ahomgraphy.NcooT
�, to will,�r

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
.:r a
Extension Study Area
�St Potential Jurisdiction Features
"h7 7�j d Perennial Stream
j
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
ME
Ponds
'r v
Data Points
0 Wet
�r
� Field Visits
��C` - �e .�•� ! Crew:
C
Qa or, \' \ ? J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
:'"vf�t
- - o
J. Harrod,B.Levan T. Hall
a• ,�*
Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
r August 3,7-9&13 14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
r •'w ,q ,, . �� and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
_ October 14,2019.
3 11111111901111 June 7-8,2021
- - -
ill an
W FIGURE
- •
I - TMHlill St
�'`� :i q�, ° � ,:� % '^s ,�.yr.- ,:} �•. r'�z., -�`_ - -.�. .k
t Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
en Dr 1-95 Business
e - t�n Cumberland County
)ounty
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
rgreer Emerald Lake Dr T 2 Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
N r2g
6 N s f +ti 1 inch =400 feet
', r R • �Q 1 �' GRAPHIC SCALE
• ,,+i U 0 x 0 200 400 800
Zr Feet
r.
s
x-Hat_f ie-I-Wt - .- -d .,�' "�� ! - Th's Exh'b't-s for planting purposes only and'nformafon shown hereon does not
I meet The Standards of ,h-for Land Sey Carolina ng-n North (21 NCAC
Sfi.1 fi00). The Exh-b't waPrs- ury compled from avalable'nf—ton obtan,d hum the
es tsted below.Streams and Wetlantls.All features locatetl n Ne field were
'` :.. • , • corded heltg a nnappng gnede Trimble G-XT or G-W00 GPS recever wth
supposed submeteraccu—y.
Sources_NCDOT NV5 Engineers.Consultants(formerly Caly.)
S
- Aerial Photography:NCDOT

Zy .
.ySM'
w
c
�i
Legend
• - " t+ PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
4rPotential Jurisdiction Features
•� ��. . . �*' y - Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
♦ ♦ �r
--7 Ponds
F 4 Data Points
41� 10 t'-
0 Wet
Field Visits
2D(a) 2D(b) Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
�a - J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
i
r. .. ,«f"'" v-f. �; :+r' 'Y '.� Y, , _�;., ..� .\ Dates:
r ^�°• -�"��' � tl#, � � April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
�" October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
s . • i+ ' +_'. " G ' hx: and February 12,March 20-22,
Ilk + '+ April 19,May 10&14-
1
,i '*'�►" ' f+. , - October 14,2019.
June 7 8,2021
t w
r
' s
ra
e
.. v: - - - FIGURE
, . f
2 D
See Inset
" 2D(a) _' _ , Field Verification Map
o _ a See Inset 1� See Inset I-95 Widening from NC 211
p
It
N , y 2D(b) in Robeson County (Exit 20)
-% �r 2�. M oI t Business (Exit 40)
In UJ ,; - Cumberland County
�E� y
�- '�= tom. �-x���
r�$R M �r•s>"�c ` TIP Project 1-5987
Rob
r
A0 91 - -, \ N eson and
O ". - <xCumberland Counties, C
Map Date:06/17/2021
t " ' 1 Inch =400 fee
r
kit
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
r
_ Feet
LyUa�-t n �, "� ,a,. - - - �, .4 T " •rrq 6
/^ << 4 ��� f j '�y J <�. i ® „� -rt'°Ir Th's Exh'b't-s for pl,,n'ng purposes only,,d'nfon—n shown hereon does not
`03//��,1 _ n _ `d.+� , y y -'�" _ et The Standards of P—n-br Land S—nyln n North Carolina(21 NCAC
/., Y -.p. - F'*" '}r ,. !M `} z11 �'#" Sfi.1 fi00). The Exh-b't was comPled from ava table'nfwmat on obta natl hom[he
1- 6 �.,- -` . "-. .w"+ - — 3 v Rr' w y--- • :-/� - es i-d below.Streams and Wetbnds.All h-,,I...tetl in Ne field were- _
v .,,.-� �. _ "i }#> 6+' '7� - - " - s 1 ";%} ".r ": ..:• ` r �',�t ai Domed pecg gaae mmme ceoxr o,Deoe000 cPs teoe yet wm,�� � :..-_ ., - -. ' G.i..-. ikr. C,'�"' - -'��jE� _ � - >"•'_ir3� _ t -� : � � �ppoeed spmete aoo�reoy
.. -_ � +"{'" .. r '� `�'r iitr e "•�:�-
g ers Sources:NCDOT,NV5 En f
' •`" kPf 1 f. " ,- _ x 'g"`i _, Rr1 a. �r f -# a; r�"� ,x.�' ry..p � � - _ __.. .Consultants(ormery Cal v 1
.1-:d Aerial PhotJ P hY NCDOT
^�
71411-11
�y

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Stud Area
40
� A-, g �� �� k � Potential Jurisdiction Features
4 k ?q
� ��• � � y� �: 1 �`` K� � � Perennial Stream
/61 �
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
2
Wetland
• t ' c Z
Ponds
r
:,A. Data Points
k + Up
r 0 Wet
Field Visits
•� _ ...- � Crew:
See Inset J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
c 2E(a) J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
-
- Dates.-
F April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
-:°x October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
J =
:
June 7-8,2021
-
� y T
FIGURE
.A .
2E
r► �' ., �0 x Field Verification Map
I 211
,
s
r
95 Widening from NC
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
M1 Y
. . in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
r Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, C
>< N
` � ,'� Map Date:06/117/2021
1 Inch -400 fee
-
,�
•■ q
''�, ; GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
y, �,• Feet
w 0.
C
1 r
Thls Exhlbl[is for lann'ng paposes onl antl'nformat on shown hereon CoesMill
not
1' R" /E 1 1 �t. �,y .ram•/=a .9 - , meet The Standards of P,,-h-hnr Land Survey ng-n North Carolina(21 NCAC
L ` / f p _ .00). The Exb-b't was—P led from ava'lable'n—ton obta natl hom the
i, A 66`6
u es'stetl below.Streams antl n,bl,tls.All Natures l 00 G n Ne fielC were
Pµg cortletl using a mapp n9 9naEe Tnmble GeoXT or Geo0000 GPS rece ver wth
opposed sub meter accuracy
,
!Y'{ � p�' �"����J -_ x'of� �;.y'-"3�_ es1.��k,, 'r'-� �•Q�,..[ ources.NCDOT,NVS 9 ers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
,01 En Ine
,* .s Aerial Photog aPhY:NCDOT
-t-
f+�y "off

Legend
+ ! • • i; w �*'_ a •'`' :� '" a 'T 3 i'f' r� PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
�., _ s ♦ m-. �\,. "ad_ � : ',S" aK :',. .i,- - ,tbt iM �. `�. Jam.... '' J
r�
4. :`�. ' +ww ` '�: zs�" rF '+' Extension Study Area
.:.; � x. ,�` .r r�..,r 'f� t ,.. .:' '.'.�4* -.�,"•.,:Ir �4.`., t.ay♦ � 3 �c�;y..d�� � `a'-. - �e,4
�<
Potential Jurisdiction Features
,k
•` I , r s � il Perennial Stream
J Intermittent Stream
N
N
N v
_d/
p r". _,,,_,,,. Tributary Waters of US
I ' .� Wetland
A&
hp 301
`f Ponds
`;I► _ - 4'4�a. g+ ,5.,� y .' i #_ :s "' _ 'X.
y
-
r Data Points
Vf-
Up
f
ea
01
=ti• ;4_--"� �° -'-"; r's.,.. ti ., may.°,. T ��5.I a,�
Wet, Field Visits
-
Crew:
.. J. Merritt,T.Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T, Hall
Su7�.
Rd-(S R,1809) _ s
, Dates:
,J.r,-v '' a / ? i' April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
v��I[ �•rG4,+ � • � � , �" October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
u
a�.,, ram«•' _ � .�X �P r�r� nd February 12,March 20 22
1-4wE�4lO� +K October 019.
April r 15
-"" °'r, —♦ . - June 7-8,2021
Russ Rd
FIGURE
>
>
5 : r
� 2F
7 i
a, QS ,7+ -
Field Verification Map
x .�
'�` 1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
Pin �'� r� in Cumberland County
y ri
nAa
�.''� ,, ,.�; � � > � '"'�� TIP Project I-5987
Robeson and
10
Cumberland Counties, C
Map Date:06/1I7/2021
N
;i ,
' � <r 1 inch = 400 feet
= .
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
h:
01
Feet
This Exhlbl[is for planning purposes only antl'nformat on shown hereon Coes not
1M
The Standards of Pod ce for Land S—o­­North Carolina(21 NCAC
z
... 56 1600) The Exh-b't was comp led from ava'lable infor—tim,obta netl hom the
O es I'sletl below. ping ms antl d,bl,tls.All fee G-I..0.0
00 G n Ne field were
-._m{{' ,�;;-' -. -g _ "'-9; ,d. - �,p J '1� 2 1`n� �•.�j:�: n cortletl us 9raEe Tnmble GeoXT or Geo8000 GPS rece ver wth
0��1 � ♦s �:�- ;.J �. -r,e r ;t' -,y a 'tit�,'�"� ''�� s. � U, � '� a L .3 � ..� �PPosea aae mefaraooareoy
?f "
Y+' 'ng a mapp n
y. �
_
' ♦ S E "� � ..- � �• ��� _ _ f < ources.NCDOT,NV6 En9lneers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
� ✓� -�' ',+�, r ` Aerial Photography:NCDOT
A - '

Legend
" a PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
�, x _-a • _ ..,� East ,.. .- I - �i � �•s. rrt ��..:
y
Potential Jurisdiction Features
.s �• M
Perennial Stream
.y,
j �
gy
4 ! ! \ ° 1 ,� Y Intermittent Stream
. .� p, � * �
Tributary Waters of US
N1. -z
• h
J { ® Wetland
�y
�.,. - •.`"' r` °•' - ..'`•'.4 - � ..r 'S.•,- .. �:u.. .`�+� .fix. ma y" '
Ponds
.� : �t` _1M: '�'�>t � .>•+. �'� _ _ - 4ix. mil,` _ �:? i �`?: - .� �� - - ,t� -
,yy,* „{ y !
- f .' fs, - 4 � ' Data Points
R. �
., ....i.: ... .. '-.- ,- r .-•..-- ' _., .::; ., ' --- �-. - - .. 0 Wet
_
,r -
Field Visits
-T
t Crew:
f
�,��� _ J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. Deschamps,
. . - .. - — ,. _ . '•. %r .e � � �tic r �` , J. Harrod, Levan, Hall
w F d B. n T
,
:. r" .� , 4;�. •..• - :T r:- - Dates:
2
April 25 27,June 20,July 6& 0,
.- -9&13-14,
, ` i ,,,•' August 3 7
•, -`..:•'�,_.'t..-;mow ,. wx - - -. -�'. •..._7 ";� - A _ A. A,. ,.i _ s �•.s e
• .-. _.. - .. „ : r -:.£• ,. � .. � . ,.,..,r ..�c- .. October 5,November 1&8_9,2018
— - a
m: "' .:' % p . P„ AFebruarypril May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
J •
FIGURE
•ate - �>x� _� � � .�. -, .-� �� �,,� � ,
}
A sate. ;��
}yi tal,
ro`t• { fit•
To-. - •S` - ;.4 � e �{�',pnrJ -� �.g�pr�, r �, ..Y hi..�. � � 4. -
�K Field Verification Map
,� y..::J• r • _'�' _'.:y_ : _ '�,T, sY, f, dui
It
-95 Widening from NC 211
�- '• �'��. �}, � �' -_� �- * , �. in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to I-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
n.
TIP Project I-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
ko
> '. ' 'Ear. ^} Map Date:06/17/2021
iG:: ♦ i'�'° /t4
q 1 inch =400 feet
�s7 ,,. _ e^ p
.:. �I�-7-.. �• .� s - 'A ;?.�k- vim• a.
r ,". , GRAPHIC SCALE
4-4
800
* 4
� '"` , ,:..,.. q,�c- „ •�+� �•', "� '�` wS• „� ��: " b - yr. ',a. -. -
-<- ,.. "- - .. :,�:"'Y�.- `-" .. : •.. ..,; vim, �y 'o j'S *:
r ,�- _.. .•-� .' ,• .�,•�'i_< _ ,`,.;. ,4':.,. .=:r-_ .;.-�X �.e„•.:.�a �k ,f. ;'ram �;�,�. '' - .> a`. �
�x
.: � � �.�*-�•.� .. � -�F-; .�. � a - �, r� - �- .'N� Feet
QJ
. .. - x-•:' '+..t, ,_,,. �•'_". - _- -'..,,.. _; -'- - � '�. � '- � - .� �'' ` _ _ Th'�e Exn'm'a is mr lann'�n i ana'nrormaron snown nereon aoe:not
P gPh—fins ony
•r:y.. F-:�.. }.- S4�- .'V• - e b`' _ :-_., r5• et Tne Standards of Pracl ce br Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NCAC
j 00;7 � -z rf � - ,,7j i .�-i-�YI�` '�...•-t ",..�• i. ,., _' ,h�'� `-h.` — _ - `�•-'• Sfi.1 fi00). Th.Exn-bit was compiled from ava labia'nfwmation obtainatl hom[ne
a ti -... .. .'.e. i. 'l. _ e'1w'
+4 -:`-- . - - .,n.. M•. >• "y;- $j-• --�-: -,, �y i, *p-.'.: s` :"; '-y•a. � es llstetl below.Streamsantl Wetlantls:All features loca[etl in Ne field were
yam+ t. ,
s � '- •' �M .: '- •r'°#G���•\j`�� "'. - :,.... ,-. =a"I W ,�„-. -'-'• �-'v � •'tt, corded us n9 a maPPin9 9mde Trimble GeoXT or Geo0000 GPS rece ver with
r -,• v a r.
d sub meter accurec
\• - .��, ..' !n fsc.,�„_ -.A-� '-.y ..:•$�A _;,.y.,.�T�
`� '"�.�1 J - Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Enginee ,Co .I.nt.ftnnn.dy Caly.)
p ' •W A►•
rs
Aerial Pnot h NCDOT
t ,
v.-
- u

itr] }, Legend
y ; .h '"' - _ a ` ' '� �'�` �-�� PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
10,
Y,
��' ° Potential Jurisdiction Features
s
s k a w`'4i a • +�Y Perennial Stream
v Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
- v ,-- Wetland
P ,
fe, w
3 ' 2 Ponds
[ y.
V
+
Data Points
+ U
v w w ase. r -` yxw a 0 Wet
t
Field Visits
Crew:
r ' f 4 ' `' J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
h 1-
S r
D t o ,
: - April25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
• , ' August 3,7-9&13-14,
Watts Dairy'Rd October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
.1'bra. R-^x�,+;y �'p,^' �' w v�.- �',� s c j e.t �,•.�T ' z+i, " L� � �..zrr �+^:wreew.�:.ar,. P Y
�.,. October 14,2019�-,--�-"� :�• .;� r„-E,+�
June 7-8,2021
s r
;ti: ,> << v _,�r a ;, i: -o{.x `i, u"a• f"�""r '.1 3; *9e+'`a: �r' S� �4 +�.0:; #t�.'�•^� 4ts S - :�
c ".
2H
FIGURE
,,, a- - •. .^ - -' a, � x 'V .'�� � ',ar.:-rix `3 Y Y. ••s.,�'`...�'iy�y`�►• '�9t:4�i4-���'�
a • ' v.
'YY6w
.i~
r
+ _ See Inset �' Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
ate . in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
t. s r e`V' d ,� `� � R y< � �R ►, �� •, TIP Project 1-5987
a, Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
� Map Date 06/17/2021
4.
�� -
- 1 Inch 400 fee
-
.� GRAPHIC E
y 8 of wy
,, 3e
0 200 400 800
`f;parr.
�'� } Feet
•; ti
A .•� d hown he
w '� + w _ '•,- — d `.. '� - •+�'' 1- -r " W` This Exhibit is for tannin ur nf—o,I antl' ormat on sreon oes not
^ J Yq$ Al
P 9 P P Y i et The Th.E ms of Praagca ror Cana sure m n Nonh camlma zt th.
.-.' ..=. _ .. -,y r2...'` '- -. - -.. -. ., �Y -• ''- _ - ^,• � - ss.t sso the exhron was eom ems.,'j.� l` ` -- ,!�. �:� - -. �. r ^f° 3 Ir_•r - ) pled ham ava'la h,-nf I...n obta ned from the
h"'LT ,i 'r. 'y:' _` - .II p 1 - ... I ]J n'' .'..-'" �•!^'-:_.-�R N _ • !! es llsfed below.Sir—, nd wenands.Anfiawres mcated nme field were
Y ;.<, F•.;",`rs. yxj ,. 1 4 - •. -::-5 - 'rs �!" .it+" R dea cor u v , iY ,. y...e - '(+ 3j fit• sn9 a maPPn9 9ade Tnmble GeoXT or Geo8000 GPS rece ver with
-,t,. � :Y t s��-w ._-•-.'J .�. y .• :y �. _i4-. V _ ..'���.�: .� ks �j' y' k, sPPosetl sub meter accu2cy
y "+BJ
- A+•=ty - - h {' '�51,, L ^' n,II d r} - ^ ,gy _ (a) onsultan Sources:NCDOT.NV5 Engineers+Cts(formerly Calyx)
Y- :al:�j.`Er +y.... .?
nenalahoto phy.NGDOT
4.c' d =# + .`s•.. 1-''�T -._. �J+t'•.
- �' � ��f 5, - � .ter �'$:.. r7�7 �.,� i..:"`.1`• ''F�. .� �.�� ,,R.� .yam- -

.. 4 ►. f � x-. _ Legend
• '� ,�`�='` `.i�'�' ���K�...* x "u;1'�.. �" lr- � PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
aappeeA.
is- * '. •;,, ; ;., ','„ .*-- -t1 _'�r. i-� ° - '•" C�+ Extension Study Area
=�'. !•n �., "� -t'��'1.'" 'r^i�'ti �z 'i �x���Yw�: x:"���.t���'.�` �i ,,ss�f��-'L;?4'`' `+0,:rh i „'�0' ,,�� �
- - - ..-�'-... .�� ,%�. �,, ya. :.d• ,c- r'��'�1f �� f,,. �+,s�, a '.'�•�"� �?�yr -.4- � `�
r �d t . . a a a5 ,z�a� .,.;_. , Potential Jurisdiction Features
°_, s 4+X. ::' � �• �i ' { , ` 1 Perennial Stream
OF
Intermittent Stream
.9 ��. str ,,.��j.' F ' .� �x�',. N ,,�,�"'� Tributary Waters of US
® Wetland
Ponds
.. -
Data Points
\ J + Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
See Inset `� 11` J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
21(a) J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
s
August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
a and February 12,March 20-22,
} .,. April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
21
'sue � . . >• -
"4 �. See Inset Field Verification Map
=fit , 21(a) r
I-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
r �
in Cumberland County
y
`mad TIP Project 1-5987
i Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
" Map Date:06/17/2021
v a SP
1 inch =400 feet
a
' GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
3
` - y.'w.,. -S� - TM1 s Exh'b t-s for plan n'ng purposes only antl f t h wn hereon does not
_ — y - p .. Th Standards of Pracl ce br Land Sury y g- N rth Carolina(21 NCAC�, ry
I\�/ '�� _t d3• - �$ esg'I'sted belxowb♦Streams antl Wetland, Allbhatulres I...tetl bn ft field were
d.�tl _ Sfi.1fi
..Yx' -�' - corded Ming a mapp n9 grade Trimble OeoXT or Geo8g00 OPS race ver with
A".^+
�, ,., - ~; .,,, _ -+. _.� �: _ rzz. .J. - .,pp...tl:ab meter aoearaoy
1
-
U
1 7 rs_1 1� - Sources.NCDOT,NV5 Enginee ♦Consultants(formerly Caly.)
ih- � �+F, `" ' t Aerel Photography.NCDOT

h Legend
err <. �- •.w �`.� � � �.
hC � _,,�.-,�-^-'""-` - � � _ .a +a.. '1, �' ,�"'`�� •' ��;� � PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
$k
* Intermittent Stream
— Tributary Waters of US
® Wetland
Ponds
,
ti
a
nfrank Dr Data Points
_.. t
l, l ._. .� - - ;' � 0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
. . _ J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
_ a
J. Harrod,B.Levan, . Hall
6
r.
" ' Dates:
4•, April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
a✓ -
'• 5 August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
s���+�' �..• - and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
~ October 14,2019.
• June 7 8,2021
y
Jill FIGURE
V.
t 2J
47
Field Verification Map
Aw
-95 Widening from NC 211
xa ; y a _ f • _ �� ,
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
t I-95 Business (Exit 40)
o
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
+� Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
- z �C '$ Map Date:06/17/2021
C; inch =400 feet
Fisher
G ��.: � ss,�g � •. �_;: „�., ._ �a �,�� ,,�,. Y. GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 aoo soo
y x
x �.. }
A
� . :
i Feet
o'-.. - .: i F ✓s.,,a _,;:_fit,�,.. ::r .. ";�. - • __-
s e
TM1's Exh b't s for lann'�
n Illyantl f mat on shown hereon doesnot
,. ,. -. - /� y,�_.. ��=. -r.Y- '?^.� ;b� ,..-..� �- ..,. :' -.; J`• -.f-... „a.. :� Y Y'i 1 -i'� ^4C'-� •• e,me s,alaas or Pra��ce�ro�1a� s­v e- N nn ca.oma(zi Ncnc
�y.J'.- �.,ry N"- r♦,.�i ,s .✓" ,v yE" %.�}ry y� •�-�'c^ -` +v,( ..f -,i •_ ,':.�E' ^ - Sfi.1 fi00). TM1e ExM1-b'�was comp'led hom ava'lable-nforma..t d I , ,ld [Fe
' ,. _. - :_... - � ,� r x.,,, s';_+.- �, ,:x< �e' -- �:.::' 4:«•`. '' . -':. �'`:` ;aT- '.�, "'"''s.- -.� � "�ah r ` -• es r�s�ea eeio,,.sveams a�a wena�as�nn r�awres moa�ea��me nem were
eomea�s,s a mapp,s sane mama ceoxr o,ceea000 cPs aye per wnn
.,cSir
'.I,-y -�� �ty- �Y'.,F.yt `Y- +�• . 4
�/��✓ ?
Sources:NCDOT.NV5 E, f
1 �� -7 !�� YL j ae� J �F•n-�' y Y ,d 4`,C.i- .. �^ � .�� i{ - -J �� 9ineers+Consultants(ormerY Gall
1'(NJ L s p
•_ nenai anot­pny.NcooT
�-
J r=
i

s t y4 ,� 5 " �.� �, - -
;�� z�_ Legend
f�
PJD Verification Study Area 0416.20 20)
Extension Study Area
n
!�Y
�+r-.�' - ,..� r*m,� .yam� �...n „�.. � � w'�ieT!'T£y � � ,t�� �. #• � -
uyaeroy '♦
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
31
ac �� ✓ ,,x �,st ! Intermittent Stream
s 'Mf Tributary Waters of US
'� y t jor Wetland
R � ;' ., a} 2 Ponds
- it 3 �
iR-
w..
�sData Points
�� it, ✓
y Up
y. - r 0 Wet
` W ` ti "m Field Visits
Crew:
an
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
yr , .. .v s- r °' J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Rlym x .'
ti See Inset Dates:
s8* 1760) x n;' � - April 25 27,June 20,July 6&20,
seele`� arch Rd (SR - �' , a y `` •' s 2K(b) August 3,7-9&13-14,
° R+ r Grp C'hr ,.> October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
_ cedar * 4 '► _ and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14 2019
..3 r _ `y ..V. .a-'. '-.wr �,.•..�,» •+sY-yr "•`"kj�� A' .. # ,y June 7-8,2021
PIP
1
K, FIGURE
, a z
,yr '+t,. � .' j, r
_• 4. .. 2 K
nr-
See In � � :• -o-
T 2K(a) 2K b �' ��� `` r
«? ( ) ,• ry See Inset Field Verification Map
"f +�
y vol -95 Widening from NC 211
i n Robeson 2 obeso County xlt
.�.; t o I-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
w
', r`ra•- .� 2K a ', 'r'.. �t �a�' "'�'� ,;,' •�'� '� TIP Project I-5987
Robeson and
x Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
'' 4 ' '. � - :dam x ,�` +` ♦ .: ` '4 a 1 inch =400 feet
. 1
• +� 7
• y �� I•�. � f air*L�y,: .�
GRAPHIC SCALE
_ ram. � * ��• .,- � , ,��. `'.�:�'�- 0 2 O4 O 800
„ -4 '
- AW
:a. ,f` -**� h Feet
x
. j a•,✓ TM1Is Exhlblt is for
r -
-
f
1 �
rk
• „ " • 4j - r. 2 pann'ng purposes only and
"'+ n,n �^ . - -:t �E _ _ • ,A,v 2 *-, } M 'ky. y,,,A "•y' meet The Standards of Pra,d—far Land Sur-y g,North Caroline(21 NG-
'F • 1? • fi00). TM1e Exh"it was compled from ova table'nfwmat on obtained Nora[M1e
fated below.Streams and Wetlands.All Natures loca[etl in she field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble Ga.XT or Geo0000 GPS r ei—adl
r�:. c, - - •• yl
�..•r A s a « - spposed sub meteraccur�cy
w
•'• f wqr - } ,�r' „f,.. .� - -f� �/d,? �'i,.�Y'+C' +A~-• Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Call
r -•'
.Y•A' Aerial Photography:NCDOT
• -
,
i
,

A. Legend
s
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
�s #
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
fir' 7
yrOak,
° 40i �, � Intermittent Stream
,� _ �,;•' ., �' �..� , •;a. Tributary Waters of US
,� ® Wetland
8 ♦ r
Ponds
•tW-
��`' Data Points
Up
t
a r
R
Y
� ,. �,
,. - . ,. f ., x ,r <" r ' x Wet
e
_
�.. Ao' �.. - Field Visits
-.ter �•+�",'::,� �f�
a See Inset -;_ � k, /' Crew:
,,
is
. . .. � .,. .. , ..� 2L(a) .. •., - �, r., ,, ,.�, :., rN � "{ *° J. Merritt T. Fox M. DesCham s
g�� r
- 'g9..- a .fir ' - a:w - ♦V fy `#A$ 3F
r
-• ,r, � . . _. r,. ;,� 7e J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
,,p'a >�... .;. -, :.:,-• i' r .. f^. �x,'fr! ,,_ s 'w "y. 'Na' 'r"��-
�
Dates:
- f '�'p+ + > ��►'i '' € '4 April 25 27,June 20,July 6&20,
`.:vim , y. ',} ' '� - • - ., August 3,7-9&13-14,
A+-- sb d ��+ + ' x a* n. y� .�� October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
!� "Piper Rd 4 , a
� �
rr�= �" � nd Februa 12,March 20 22
_ �' --a..�...�..�a.��.�;_x-...._��.. ., _ =..w.�• ,ram: April 19,May 10&14-15,
u & October 14 9
201 .
_ . y,._ _ ,�qc a• ..r.,-,..,.�^ �^,'„ June 7 8,2021
- �" �. .-...rr,,g - --- .._ • --man-.:. _-_`'•-_,. __. .._ _ �� - .,--� _ � _ _Jll
�E'r ep
> ,
� FIGURE
1
i
f5F,.W. # I 4t r rry t < I
N r ,�3
-� -�,- -_ Field Verification Map
-95 Widening from NC 211
_ �wr :` � 't -.: _• _
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
.� � F �' ,�fpr4,.S'� e,fti to I-95 Business (Exit 40)
J
"A ` � 2L(b) �, ' � 's 3 , , ° , t in Cumberland County
i
m t
TIP Project I-5987• tcum Cumberland Counti
es,
See Inset �► - Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
or GRAPHIC SCALE
Sep, . t : ' ., �� - � . 0 200 400 800
`-:.�� "'*,N
Feet
om
Y `,� '_.� 3,I♦ .b� -.� , � "lit t
661600)�.r - y S Thls E,hlblt is fo,planning purposes only and'nfo nh,n shown hereon does not
rT B
_ '=� # 'y`/'ti., •'!._ e•' , l+R. - m r x �,� �1 -"� ' �T f r ! L p f aet The Standa of P—h-for Land Su nyng-n North Carolina(21 NCAC
. �,:,,r >\ ;�v� ,, ." „ r,. - - A{,fs 1}k•� The Exh-b't was—pled from—ni.ble'nfamat on obta ned no the
�, rds
A -1 • ' - ,,)' ..4. �" a W:, '+.. d , '• �.,^�,#` �,�( s}.' es tst.a below..svt;.ms ana w.nands.All reawres loo.tea in ft n.la were
,1 •. .' :.� 1- `tieomed psng a—pvng grade Tnmble ceoxT o,Ge W00 OPs,ece we, ith
..Ppoeed sub reeter.00graoy
\/ ,. �FFfii � � ,*{� '�" �y �{;Yt r 4�c _ " �j -� .may ..7'..r £ e m��•
►' S -, ' Sources.NCDOT,NV5 Engineers♦Consultant.ftnhnerly Calyz)
'lreE• zal
f' t - .
s
Aenal Photography:NCDOT
-{-L';- -'"
,
"
f yqq.

CD '� � q ,
a
Legend
A.
.� < `•.� iti,; �, _- � PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
4 +y � f r„ ` Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
f
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
t. - - rr ,
Wetland
2 Ponds
mom'
Data Points
+ Up
0 Wet
See Inset
{.y + 2M(a) 2 (a> field Visits
•t M F
SA
n ; Crew:
�s J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
"•§t � fr y� � ��< "� < �'-�'_ a "'+ + April 25-27,June 20 July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
', +,..�, ' „e, ..6_ •fir.
J.
K
and February 12,March 20 22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
, October 14,2019.
� June 7 8,2021
.�
z:
r �
�� FIGURE
-
;r •
¢may
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
.' to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
S µ • Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
s `
Map Date 06/17/2021
v
1 Inch =400 fee
-►'a.rlCla Dr " t
GRAPHIC SCALE
� N�Wilklns �
Olt 0 200 400 800
�,.�+
Feet
�, s �`� ` :r. +P r%t� 4 ,t• s.. - -a Y ' •�``- t 1 . e- t
t
-�_ r 4 '" ' -'y. t �_ o P� _.,id` p _^ ,.. - �. � _ J ✓"z' '�' ``` TM1's Exh'b't-s for plann'ng p only antl'nformat on shown hereon does not
x ry ° +-.e•���rk ` ',. �. "('`�1\'�� _ t� .,-.,R 4 �9 r r - ¢' 1 Rt eet The Standards of Praatceo br Land S—nyng-n North Carolina(21 NCAC
+ V. Th,Exh-b't was comp led from ava labia'n1-1 on 11,n,1 hom the
B - _ - + - ✓{. ces i-d below.Streams antl Wetlantls.All f-,,locatetl n Ne fieldrwere
N allance St °' t„' �cn e . ,t eye
�•- g - F //� 1 '. ;y,i T,._, �� . Shag xF � n W vP+- TN �'"'� rePpros d,in metere currping y de Tnmble G-XT or G-W00 GPS re wth
y
'' - � ,o 'r'Y.� . ��'. {° '-� �_>a Y� - .;�� -A ''� ,�<'Y * '1►•s. -' - ..� ��\♦ Sources:NCDOT,NVS Engineers.Consultants(formerly Calyz)
:
+I _ +-° d
.y. .��, F♦ -..... .�-.° _ ..,.- � ,`t l - _ _ * Aerial Photography:NCDOT
lid-AW
-
,»

Le end
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
w
,. �
F -•� ^. ,,,s c, t' �r s �._y 8• ,! ud A Extension St rea
y
�'�•
f Potential Jurisdiction Features
\ r Q 1
}�. Perennial Stream
` '47,
,,'d Intermittent Stream
Y'
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
N �'` 7 � Ponds
n �"
r
.i , i �� �w 4� Data Points
r..r sw $ 0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
- A
x". ,. a-,.;'} .�.%i =:%a-:d s,;, '.,,: -•.§ '� s '- y - +� r,t �t'w5 �� .,2,a:'" '' 'a� ,.z+ April 25-27,June 20,Jul 6&20,
s a� p
„'.. ,. J
?' August 3,7-9&13-14,
. " •;, .� •�`, r k� Aq- i �_ � �� r�i y�3 ,�� October 5,November 1&8-9,2018 as w and February 12,March 20-22,
n�
a � a
F
April 19,May 10&14-15,
i
" - •." October 14,2019.
J
�.-" .,„ � � � June 7 8,2021
- - FIGURE
F +
Field Verification Map
r
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
- TIP Project I-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
i c Y Map Date:06/17/2021
' i 4T 1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
/rNFeet 40
Thls Ezhlblt's for plann'ng purposes only antl'f t h n hereon does not
m.et The Sta d d f P ante for Land Sury y g-n N rth Carolina(21 NCAC
561601) TM1 -,lift ompled from ava'I bl f t n obtan,d hom the
Kam` es I'sted b I St as antl Wetlantls.All features I...tetl in Ne field were
cordetl usng a mapping grade Trimble Ge XT or Ge W00 GPS r...ver wth
..pposed sub meter accuracy
Sources NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
r4' Aerial Photography:NCDOT

Legend
i s` PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
"
Extension Study Area
a- p nvllle p
r
r '
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
_„ ..... Intermittent Stream
t4tl
x f i _ .
��. L ""-'` the" -
Will, Tributary Waters of US
s * y ® Wetland
V 1 F�u
A:.,.
.emu Ponds
Data Points
+ 0 Up
0 Wet
1 �
Field Visits
- Crew:
J.
MJ.
e Harrod,B.Levan T. Hall
_
y Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
r
August 3,7-9&13-14,
, Yr, October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
y
v s e s „.; and February 12,March 20-22,
19,May 10&1 ,
,�• ;* April
14,2019.1 A 5
June 7-8,2021
. �� , ; , i _ r - - � FIGURE
Vi20dim
a,
Field Verification Map
k 3 �t"` � - � � 1: ,AA'
I-95 Widening from NC 211° in Robeson County (Exit 20)
", Fa to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
rya in Cumberland County
. � v. j' St ( TIP Project I-5987
rx rr ir`�aC ' 9rd% Robeson and
Cuberland Counties, NC
ine'IDr
�Or m
'3z Map Date:06/17/2021
r
* 1 inch = 400 feet
E GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
r
..r�. � Thls Exhlbl[ f pl g purposes only and f t h n hereon does not
qqq / r "F aet The Sta d d f P n-br Land Sury y g- N rth Carolina(21 NCAC
_ ; f 56 1600) Th E b-b' mp led from ava'I bl f t n obta netl hom the
I'sted b,lm St and Wetlands.All features locatetl in Ne field were
cord,d ullng pp g 9 de Tnmble G-XT or G-W00 GPS rece ver wth
At
4W ..pposedsubmeteraccumcy.
° { z`• +Free .lr 'TT'.:dr Sources:NCDOT,NVS Engineers"Consultants(formerly Calyz)
MM- ..° D r
Aerial Photography:NCDOT
'� Freedom Dr

- Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
2.
L
Extension Study Area
F j x F �C► Potential Jurisdiction Features
s'. ' Rfi V' � Perennial Stream
r
tr
��
[ mom
_ I Intermittent Stream
* MI
;, � - —"'— Tributary Waters of US
'.� ., Y-�.-• � Wetland
•� i
2 Ponds
Data Points
+ UP
*, 1 ' tile._ . Wet
�.
Field Visits
Crew:
.�lt ■*" r } R, erg, ; J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
� 4 . : ► 4 ,r Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
p and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
� October 14 2019.
• '+r ' 3f = `#.x''t#e$r -:. ' ik � ., rt# , .4 June 7-8 2021
JI
FIGURE
2P
Field Verification Map
-95 Widening from NC 211
1*,�= r
ac in
Robeson County Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
r
- in Cumberland County
y
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
_ Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
07
—
1 inch -400 feet
fit',r t
[ GRAPHIC SCALE
3C�
% f`- 't 0 200 400 800
i•-+5.� {{$$`` 3N� c $.y'T ?',Y.,. ''j� //�. ry h _-
r Feet
meet The Standards of P�raPctceo br Land ry y g, rt roll eo(21 NCAC
T bl G XT G 8000 GPS h
r
-•E! • '• _ �i �_ �:-1' � c tleetlauts n9faxmlaPV n99�ade m e eo or eo rece ve Ww tre
and n
W1600). from ava'I bl f N th n obta netl ho
_ etlantls.All features loca[etl n Ne field
ources NCDOT NVS Engine.. Consultents(formerly Calyz)
�i.
6 En Ine
Aerial PhotWr,phy:NCDOT

O
Legend
z {" �" P •'y,, ~fir. ! - PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area O
' Potential Jun sdi Jurisdiction Featu
res
v ! f
Perennial Stream
qi
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Or
v
d
�^�' :.� � - s*-°" ., � ,, =: - I 4 „�,,,a� .,"�`:"� •.�,, `•_, ;��i ,, _� 3 L., Cd - Wetland
. r
k
,
' n
D �r
r ,
Ponds
,,._,� �r����;.. �,•i. ". ," '' "�" ,.,..' ..mow ^,i..;,�:''�',�.r�c �t /� .. �.... ,> 'r+ .
F
r 7 a
3'
Data Points
1
f ys.yr .�-7'- _ ly` ,ap'�. v' ,• _ .. v y,..r;.�:7< s _ + - +; F'-- �`,,,�,".. + Up
L ' 0 Wet
y*
i
Field Visits
Crew:
o
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. Deschamps,
,• : �r� (II J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Y,
co
f
!'F Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
1 October 5,November 1&8 9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
•, -. .,:., . October
9 June7 8,2021 e
FIGURE
• C ? 2 Q
QIf
- W
Field Verification Map
k•
' Nr
-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
9 k =a to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project I-5987
�� ti. Q f{ �•_ p� Kzret, Robeson and
=_-► _ _ 3'`° Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021 pe
�a W�tt'pl' r+` ; �,•ll� r e. �c rr
r ' --a -
` 1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
4` y i ye% y� Thls Exhe is for plan f.P,purposes only antl f t h wn hereon does not
5x,y _ X-.i — ��^y va • } 6 '�R• "�' - meet The Standards n Pracl ce br Land—ni y g- N rth Carolina d NCAC
56 1600) TM1e Exb-b't was comp led from ava'lable'nfwmat on obta natl hom[M1e
urces I'ued below.Streams antl Wetlands.All features I...tetl n Ne field were
- .{ 1 E f"J tt� --�. p .ya• cortletl us ng a mapp n9 9nade Tnmble GeoXT or Geo0000 GPS rece ver wth
opposed sub meteraccumcy
_ �d _ 1t E.� � ``� ��3,.s �^','� -r•'`. -. sneers. �ormery
,r Sources NCDOT NVS Engine.. Consultants f I Calr,)
Aerial Photography NCDOT
o�:. ► �, „

Legend
rd •' r r �C�j� PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
v s Extension Study Area
. s: - '' � ✓� ;,tom« K y �w �, .�.. ,y�'C,
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
r' w nn
F� Intermittent Stream
-
i, Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
a Ponds
ellw- c 9
} s Data Points
Up
�a P
0 Wet
, . v Field Visits
v
Crew:
J. Merritt,T.Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
fi ' nrrA . �� r 1 �3 . .* : , Dates:
. .
�CF' r a,z > April &
z
0
August
`terms October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
r
s .> 4 and February 12,March 20-22,
4 k 5:: .• ,. t s -- i1 t a April 19,May 10&14
{
..- :T - ;,; '" '3 pt"�,r. .. s r..'-�, ( .��s' •. RP *f �.' -• '0! r '-ir ' .:"ems'' A°% '' x`r�y¢ .
October 14,2019.
wa, r
z
t �;�' � . s'�r ,.�, .•f a June 7-8,2021
'B kNOrn 1 - FIGURE
d R 97 � .
uc R S f',* ,- v 2 R
V�k� . = s
9F ,-26 1
4W nor
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
>�f
Gj in Cumberland County
ell
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
.•r r Cumberland Counties, NC
J
Map Date:06/17/2021
iV, 1 inch = 400 feet
,
j• �rY iN#
.11
GRAPHIC SCALE
M 0 200 400 800
Feet
Thls Exhib't' f pl g purposes only and'f t h ereon n h does not
'� ( �, *r i• ra meet The Sta d d f P d-for Land Sury y g- N nth Carolina(21 NCAC
r
i
,,.
K
56 600) The
E m res smp led from ava'I bl f t n obtan,1 horn the
ur es 1'stetl bl M1 b St a end Wetlantls.All Natu loca[etl in Ne field were
;7 .P . corded ming a mapp ng grade Trim ver ble GeoXT or GeoW00 GPS rece wth
g�
A �y ' 'e "�;,g supposed sub meteraccumcy
t gyp." dr 3,....�
,pe"4+>}r •�' 'A -,y d ^t -� • Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
' _ ''.}`. 'Y M ,.,� w xs 4 r•,t Aenal Photography:IN DOT
' r

, d �
r r Legend
Ilk,
rz ,` PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Aw
iA1p r r' Extension Study Area
A ml ` � 4 Y# '-"` Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
4 3� lit, r,r.
w x
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
w �
a
v
;�, � 7 �+, �% ,.a`�`�"•' ,C �. ® Wetland
4f
1tp 4 y R� i 1 Ponds
,
av .� Data Points
e�
�< �� WY
v
x c; 0 Up
°d",, ,,,,",-+ •+t;. ., J"+ +#' » '• ._ _ - !t Wet
Field Visits
2.
Crew:
-
e r ' J. Merritt,T.Fox, M. DesChamps,
<-
r r rM1 J. H
arrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
v,�r
"
�tY
.�'' k���� �. Dates:
�, T
��:� ,�" � � , ." .. ..,,^ :; :�� �' v _ r° April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
� .., .9±"'v ..is"'A' f.` •. ..- c ''`"�".,. ' ' ° e`d J!:y< rF C...•,:,r'�'+.� .� �. ,o �;" >•. - .��" :' '' '' ,.. . � :_'�,.;, ,a.' '�'` a October 5,November 1&8_9,2018
t
o
e mx
and February 12,March 20 22,
,r "S - •.r'�, '"�' ,p.,�y-<._ -°�` - -.--,. _ ... - - __ ...z?-,�'',' - - - •,,, 'F'#,�y "' .. April 19,May 10&14-15,
�z y October 14,2019.
4
June 7-8,2021
r�-
r
a - FIGURE
Y4 I
• �3�S����` .� "ri.� ,►.��+-S YyKy'`r." ,� �� �+, .. t III '; M. H`. � ti 2
_
.JS
q
-
::T �* ..L��r � g;,: $ I' �,-+.�I. f x, ,% :_,,+' :v��- .. flr�^•� 3 1' �'t-�.�S.:rn,.. _� ,�..
Field Verification Map
• ,..y - * rrru'`F �+ y4, $*q+Px"';6iv. ,R r.�.± +M�7 'd't -'' >„ -yc �. ,� -. _
sag
195 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
t" r e t f;nP+l4"'
o I-95 Business (Exit 40)
5 , -," j in Cumberland County
.Mf1!'' y "'� F Nl-xf* •.utf i `'s '� F'` '3 ?a .. _. _ .
F4i
TIP Project I-5987
Y '` a Robeson and
�� � � ,.-� Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
at -$a �•yy� J �iM�,a '2�� 3" `..���` .a'�Asa ♦ 4t' � ,f,:.
{� ,4 µ - 1 inch = 400 feet
t .. -J
GRAPHIC SCALE
All
We
0 200 400 800
�.
Feet
�(.•P� +� AS"� �t_•ya § \ - `
Thl,
Exhlbt for plann' ur no pposes only antl'f n h hereon d es not
mee
s
q'�$ ,5 y/'• 1, �, +/ Y• t�' i% i - - t The Standards of Pracl ce br Land Sury y g- N rth Carolina(21 NCAC
sy. ',}. ,; ay' t '� 4.X.*-- •'$ _ \ 56.1600I. TM1e Exb-b't was comp led from ava'I ble information obta netl horn the
u•, La � {6✓ `r - .+ � � , f - S x�l y ces I'stetl below.Streams and Wetlantls.All features locatetl in Ne field were
,,rd,d ullng a mopping grade Tnmble G-XT or Geo8000 GPS rece ver wth
6 sue'.,,yyyh ➢y} ,J '7` �i tir, opposed sub meteraccurecy
Sources NCDOT NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aenal Photography:NCDOT
M� � 1_-:.3r_! �4'f�P"�'''•a w'�Aa� �� �"'o'.a�'' �t J �* .A a� 4 '�

41
= y '_�
Legend
P JD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
n �
Y'iP 4 Extension Study Area
1
Potential Jurisdiction Features
,
* w Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
w
. � � II � y �i�"-"• - F: ��� F ;{":� v. :�� _,,,_ Tributary Waters of US
-
w•
�� •�"�. ���' ���� "a.'..�.,, �;� .��r,' '�ti R ,, ® Wetland
i
`-
^ 1�� ,r y it ry 1.1 1 V A•.- SIv i �J' R 'Y` �' .RV' _ l�
f w�, ,� �• �. �' �,� - '. � ��` r � � �' Ponds
i
. .vim v.�' - .. ,:.• - -_. :.,�.Y .:,. "�. tia '�.>'°< `a"� ,. -r°. - _ -'-7. +<. ---'+ �..o.• Data Points
p
� r.
e
'� ;� ._ -��- '♦ .X� � t^ I,a 0 Wet
1
.r
ry`� q �
ti3 K 11 Field Visits
Cr
.SMt.r.• ,: ��.Y +�.^iA ''� lieJ. Merritt,T. Fox, M. Deschamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
AT r
April 25 June Jul 6&20,
} � + " s �. August 3,7-99&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
Alk _. 610 INS - �f" + April 19,May 1 5,
Om
October 140 019.1
,
.—�•-�------ _ — � � ' _ �_ � � June 7 8,2021
T. Ap - FIGURE
- _
2T'� Y h `y '7 M -
�F, ':. F � i
tow
yf
t
FS'-7d``• _ .> ._ '. `ma$� - ,�'�` "' Ij�*a'`"`_ �w.rt, gip"
>f
w ,
1
SRC 242)
2
,..�;=,w. ..-.�.....__ <...:'-. ^' -.�� •• ;°' �, sa' "'" ,, r�. y t^�,.fir � "f ��' ^",s,..,,.�...... �'3s,.a�y;�.."
•
Field Verification Ma
,e
�. p
^
....,, - •41.,
1-95 Widening from NC 211
A, in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business Exit 40
in C )
umberland County
X r
�'�� � � a ;�`� ����'��.•" ,,� Y .g�r� \ \ � ��. �. .� �. TIP Project I-5987
,^,• t . r �a� '' `_ { Robeson and
.v
_
' ' +'I n . Cumberland Counties, NC
:. !'Y - ,i➢l, ♦ Tr ^. .,� .: •Y.* ;af' R
^� r
Y �
• _w'.-` - Map Date:06/17/2021
•s . '
L
r�Q, 1 inch =400 feet
. d ` e _ aer GRAPHIC SCALE
! T ;.
0 200 400 800
Feet
q',+/ �'•`# h,.T .x �'4 -.r� ,:�"F ,. - Exhlblt is for plann' ur ng pposes only antl' n shown hereon d es not
me
A.
le
f
t The Standards of Pracl ce for Land Sury y g- N rth Carolina(21 NCAC
,J ^�_b�� '. �y. A••y - 561600). The Exh-b't was—pled tram—ni.ble'nf—ti obta ned ham the
es I'sted below.Streams antl Wetlands.All features I...t,d in Ne field were
II,
.corded ullng a nnappng grade Tnmble G..XT or Geo0000 GPS r--Wth
✓� Pw R' `' r - - Sources NCDOT,NV5 Engineers.Consultants ft—rly Caly.)
., P ,��e:f r i# •.tom 9r t w 9, Aerial Phot Wraphy:NCDOT
T -' r

- r`'i .•P � _ fi'7. �^... t,�. �ha � y,�� �,R 4�. r r bt. � ar ;..�� *y�� F.� .. �2V
.. � � ,�, b .. ''- - -fig•"{T -
,
t. ; . „ art .' , • ,:: Legend
41
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)Al
. . ,t}. I-•
w
�?4 Extension Study Area
qF
* ... l
ga t. y Potential Jurisdiction Features
r
Perennial Stream
'A ` f ar £� « Y t. a r Intermittent Stream
_4 ,.tr. Q1
�r ,,ift
Tp
�1 A
"' •, • ' r ��' �'`� •, Tributary Waters of US
i -
Wetland
r
' Ponds
77
r r rat rf
✓� ca' f� , ' Data Points
s�Vi3
Wet
Vr
.
J R>:.
,�"h� A �_� � Field Visits
O� ,& a r" * ,; '" Crew:
y6b ,.; s' $fig` ; ' Y„x�* J. T. M. m s
f�N l J Merritt
sAd S� �. ,T Fox M DesChap
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
`%r � ';,� ro Dates:
sa�,.�iS','r�r�' y„ % 33] r April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
hf-
}
/6+ August 3,7-9&13-14,
,•R , r October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
-� - _ >r .,a• Ober 14 201
' - r ,✓. Oct 9
-
1
n_ le * June 7-8,2021
Pei
wr
lfr
. Fii . � FIGURE
co
Field Verification Map
�� ,� • ; �,. 1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
4. to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
'pII
Ti
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
`0 y r - Cumberland Counties, NC
R' •_ y, �.S xr � *. %3r W ' � _� Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
�r
�Y
Feet
a.
s
'; , : �,.' < + { �y•� 1 mM1's Exh'b't-s for plan,rig purposes only S, f M1 h n hereon does riot
�.� � ^` /�, eel TM1e Standards of Prac�ce for Land Sury y g- N rlh Carol na(21 NCAC
\V p "0 •:Y ' �` 56.1600)'ste0 belxowbl5lreamsandeWetlandsVaAllbhalures bcatedbn,he field we're
— `re�e � F yxR, ur ever\ i-?4,m�y: A "# cordetl us rig a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or G..6000 GPS re wlh
�' • 'Y supposetl sub meter accu2cy
�
AeralPM1otograGphy�NGDo neera+consuuanls Formerly, caryxj
r
•..•ram�� I �,_�•-��.-_, �°. ��. lS � '�'� 1<e:. �•.•�- O T
+ \ 71

-
Legend
t. J
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension StudyArea
• L,' ,� �'¢ �� i Y � �. .y � `�fir• „ .���"'�� .
An Potential Jurisdiction Features
.„ r
Perennial Stream
Ann'awooddDr° ',_ f £r gets
;� :<:.^- i k` Yv'r„" � "y�'°• (Y"Y,"' �� Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
-� Wetland
r
r� '^ CD
A1► `@a ,,, Ponds
a9getta"G�� � �t �
� e.
Data Points
V {
t
� , t, -' •� - , _ , �y/r, ;�• r�:, '� t'. . 0 Wet
e
galderson
*F7 '"""Ackley 1Ln 1, Field Visits
X
.. Ct*- �.. t# J-,
`, Crew:
� J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
' lg„ J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
d�7 . ,, 4 r '�,.aw► -tt,
i, > k� B2ky Ct' Dates:
z
�. � --. r April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
w
@ [�", Bltta e Ci �� � / August 3,7-9&13-14,
3
t October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
ol
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019
° Al -Shipman Rd (SR��285) - -
r.-
� June 7 8,2021
7 _ .
4
s - FIGURE
$
x
-• a ,. -`.
s 3C ter»► : > ,x ��
Us HWy
w ,
_ , a Field Verification Map
f -
"' � ,.;�r�! C �--..,u:4P' �r.. - - � �4F- Oil -' " .W �1'�"�.`' -�'• _+ z "9'. %-" yts`. �-. ?sS�s.
IVA r � ., r'= �-, % �" � I-95 Widening from NC 211
-
, .
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
sine 40
}� SL
P� y
y� to I-95 Business Exit
:.� yr c �._,, � a, - �` 7 �:
may �3 ,, A ,✓ in Cumberland County
1 i )
'g tti3 tl� 4 All
=m - rt TIP Project I-5987
-;J �r,i_i - 4' � � ] Y- ,+! aR �� �,. 'l"A �� ,��- •tt Y e- �,., ..�!ry, 6. � �f' { '1 - :v�i.,.
�*"�..z'•*A` - .;; ' c r s- ,-'a. -t'. n yv. - ' ~;_; - - �� �t Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
w�" �,...�,.�, $��, ., . ,r _.� y.',� �� �;� �,. �" �,�• �, Map Date'06/17/2021
u+^ ttp� �1t1t�ItR���F � •;p ,,.,aF• - 3, ,:"Jd•Xi, 3r-' `"�,�5� .,J' vF�. �. .P�-. '�
,
Ali, —
=T. � - , ,;�° � ',z � . ' :,,_ ;�� .� _�., , ��- � •4 *� 1 inch -400 feet
*,?syi...�..ph "l••. �,,,_ 'Z� •' ta' :.. ' ':.. ��" ,x,• ,1.._;p " '� -
r1 GRAPHIC SCALE
'�•• :f"/�> r -.rk.. ::r'�.•�"'® '#• '' :. .,.% '✓.y q'i+w<- ,'.W"... .f' +.'� 4 5".�.t`` y r y'.-'✓ (� .+fS_ ...r'
.. • • , .. - V - ,•,(RAPT ;.
n +tb`° .; ?� � . `; :•; 0 200 400 800
>
_.
sA .• `Yr x' -6�.. -.Y r�:'..Kn�. is ys�.u.•.�yb(3 ...R.Sr't .6 . ` �:
APO
may:--� �...� .,-„�� .:*(.y..,.... yq...t�. .,+-� :r ,rp=�- srp!". k' O. ',�r;..yx,'.' Feet,
70
Thls Exhrolt is for lann'm onl and'nformaron shown hereon does not
P 9Pnr Y
r''. •` `' =�A.' A -'T 'r.�"'• `�f • meet The Standards of Pracl ce br Land Surveying in North Carolina d ,th.
56 1600,. TM1e bit.,
-b't was come led from ava'lable ,,Ia..t dine netl el [M1e
Ilstetl below.Streams antl Wetlantls.All haWres loca[etl n Ne field were
"r'' .,d -.^t " F -�Y •- r1}"+,r1�'� ,./', ', �aF y.-' ,y -;~ • gay - cortletl us 9�ade Trimble GeoXT or Geo0000 GPS rece ver with
v.�. .r.:- '}.m,`..- s ``�' e. .y^w-.* " et. ;I,:s 1 i i�.w. .R .PPosed..b-. ere curecy
,.s., .-,•,s y}yI[, _Y "t4-n"r v rC' 1 i
--`,,. "• .aA$ .� '" <�' ^.-,3g 3"":'�..�`+'ef•_,�.t �.. erg' _ . .�r". �!'�r�1':dt,�e�. ..s° °���� � �f/' 9 -
w
"ti _ �P� K�-•+ -,+ems' �',� � �•A -��9.• ��- a',.y,r�.,, �Fj1 r Sources.NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
5 _ ` fP°M''RF g• '7fZ: 1'Y'r 'Y° t `.G:'- 3 v:, 2�'Y• �.. * ➢r�/ �,.- _ Aerial PhotW,,phy:NCDOT
iY

.yre ,�,t'a � '.� $_ r�F`!�+ . n ::.,-' 1 � '... � }' s.�� i_�„�•,4, .
� ` �.
,�' i»y. �� ,� � � �� �: .µ:` ..,-, Legend
y
�,� c :3•,... d /- - ' 4'r .. .♦ / a I f' - y` ��WS�., ,,. ' '.,, ,�,,* 'vr.. et.- ' ' ",._"ar• l/ '�>+' - ,
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
.. - 'a i^ it .3';?�,1� K s' :.. ✓ e, �, .�, -
s
,
ask
Extension Study Area
K
,
i
� i
rA
d
,• ^str ,-. _'�� .-- ;�$r �'..+t•�, F: .J ;;- _ r: ,:,�'", m- e MR
Potential Jurisdiction Features
�� �i b�.. �Z 1�1 4'�` �► 4
�s• y
- r
;' :.i-`-'ia t , fir.. ,9/ ' •` .' .. �;• y Y` .x. h,. ,_ 3�
w
''� ,j�. v v�', � 1, ,., y r r d o + ,- '�, •r,. ..,e•� , ��; ,�2, �"�.., e„ � i �;' 4�. �� .✓�� Perennial Stream
,. s•f': R ', - .iA' '� '" -, :� °'° ! '.' .fix. � .,ey _ � � •i' s• !� � �+6� � (;�
•
e� s,wP!, ,�J�• IS'T. x ;�, �`� ,"5,• �. � 'r"'� �� � i ,.a Intermittent Stream
,
r e
.1'!11
l
r
i �r '�?`' � � 1 -� Tributary Waters of US
• ,.. :� h- ., Jsr , �y .f'Aw� '�F % x^ � �'* /' -;..ii!,. -. . ..*. '-'#. X.I. r a .ems .. '`�.
�Y
'�7�- rr�F'.,• :,' .' a. 4L!, Pry-.- .� ,^" �.+,' ' ,•a.� a '4 y `U• s` .. i� ;�I
-y
F Wetland
rr- sJ � - , {;�S + �:Z: .,m �Jd�': i R ,,i`^�''
` s „ter " „ / 0-`
`� t� e
,
�,�`'. � -af�:,� z, < ,. ;- t •..r �;Is�'ne .s'� ,- _ '':� ,,. -j^ d�• -� -,3"� _,�h'i�`�'� �i w � a - �'y�s- •..` ` �
Ponds
771'.
Q _ <+ Data Points
+ Up
4 It
Migc'
>,.' e Wet
Field Visits
- -
_.. - ,•may:- .. "
� r
al
c
.rT...-F .a ....... -.. .r
' ' -----.—_ --- •+'�_ r s �p•� �-'�: J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. Deschamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
zef
e
R
Dates:
k
' 9 - �.,
_ � � ` '-` April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
a'P,
�, �c �� � r''%�'t• � ..� ,. +�, �.' ...'' - ''` -�.��•'+»,� a August 3,7-9&13-14,
w a
Octobers,November 1&8 9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
- Wig['• jaT- _A.. •Y'" U- -�,. } ,. ,.e. - sM1{'"'. ,��,ax w �.•F w
' w. 7'" ,- I ./• r '. '^a %�- .: ¢ :. -:... .�M «./., "�'�i.. �'M'„a .:
April 19,May 10&14-15,
• .,.. , . ,, - �•.. -,: �...tom- � r p .,<�1. «.•, yP,n�"CK
, •
- fi-., r:. ;. _. -. -. � + e ,yd"I' +; { rsa., ;,' •.d' .'c .t October 14,2019.
.'
June 7-8 2021
MW
r
y kr
r FIGURE
r.
c f
•t ,
9
ag'
- ..: •. .�.. �,rsor „G,�,,,.� - ,...>>. a= a Fi..' f ,+i?,. �1 ?& n•» ..ss`F
�_ ..;, .r .. 1�g1k r -3 ..,a,,r, .,_;r �4ln? w -. '`-d£., v � ,Y,:r r#•t •�.. ��,mac
AN
'.: .�' .v _ ..,. -; ;A j. .. ,. :. ,.,,.M'a.., _.. i -„ :. :'!.- k. t`its C 'a ./ ��.'✓x� J�P -^�" ,,�y�
.M -;'iY -f"+. :!Y 1 ✓ iY r: d., C,' �r.+V,i - 'A',S ,.e 'T;y �''�
"'e`F:� $=5ed% - � � ^.l ,,� J i 4 .i•^i '�v {y_.�-:�' .tin' v";,-, ;-.' -
�
,�,irv" �..' �. '�� , '.a �`.:: f"`',•q�^�-,_ .,r 1�c t`•,,: is �r 'r '`� ;� �' � �,� per'•{ r � i
w
., .. "` :, • .. .f /4 ., ^.,� `gh�t ��YJ. .�i 4• .�. s�..' , ,:..�= ¢ ,r�,r �;_` � A P'Jr
' µ. „' a ,�' -�;f ,-` ,• a, ^s<.-„ -r. r.7. ;1s, , �,- 3d'1��{r {`a '�+ { ...r a g. �"''�."�r 'r. 'X'•.� r, �' �
. ', � mod:. ,,;.,., -{f n a• �':..y �a�•. ,.� � "ir... 4,f'/ kus F 1'. y� •�'i ,u'✓m �, _
Field Verification Ma
-
9
-95 Widening rr I from NC 211
„>
• ' �,. 'E� �i�'`> : ' n�,� `¢ �:' ;•-'�.� in Robeson County (Exit 20)
4 r.
,' fi .
r ;� y to I-95 Business Exit 40
in Cumberland County
44
�t
TIP Project 1-5987
r ,a
Robeson and
1' t. Cumberland Counties, NC
Wn
Map Date:06/17/2021
I
,.Oil'
1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
`g OR
0 200 400 800
�I tM Y�Yte lgi iyrpc' t *011Y� y>ry
a `,a ,:. -?�} Feet
e
41 •o _ a,yti r t.' '�W; 4 .i R�' J 1.rr r✓ ' }i' '+�'> Thls Exhro m lt is ,plann' ur ng pposes only and r r shown hereon does not
-It �f • • "ijs meet The Standards of P,acl ce for Land S—y g- N rth Carolina(21 NCAC
56 1600) The Exh-bit
was comp led from—ni.ble'nf—ton obta n,d from the
es feted below.Streams end Wetlands.All h,-ne,I...tetl n Ne field were
peyer• recortled us ng a mapp n9 grade Tumble GeoXT or Geo0000 GPS re wth
j £ supposed sub meter accuracy
Sources NCDOT NV6 Engineers,Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aerial Photography:NCDOT
nr/ All
:J�

Town of �,. City of
etteVille
► ,. s` ► �� L �� - � 'ate
i =11► � � e � 4 , � � •,.;� , 'ti Town of
1f� �r` �� � �� �. �• �` • � Exit 40 t ��:k
Exit 25 VAIM, `►
T _ �• t / r
ss � � .• � -�� Town of �� ,�� ,(� � � 11�� � �� '�,.� � .� a `
"7 r
• .- - ��_ � ���` :. -• 1 � � ��' ' � � +*►/, 0
Cityof Il�1�� /✓� �� '1 ► iti J ��1/"r!'� .�. �i off+
Lumberton �1 . .►�. \ �� �. �} . ��1 `• Ir, 1�1 � ��
j •� 1 may. 3 ���,�, )1AM
i m)
� t - • gi�c, •�7 •
yFA
rw-
-• •- •. :• •. NORTH • • • DEPARTMENT 1-95 Widening from
OF '•' •N US 301 in Robeson Countyto
- • . • • :• •. DIVISION • 1-95 Business1)in Cumberland County.
•
1.5
1 0 1.5 Miles
QDRobeson an• Cumberland

Legend
1 = 1 PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
1 �r�
L a Rd ♦ � � � w Extension Study Area
i �G • • ' I
` Potential Jurisdiction Features
1 r�.
Perennial Stream
gents�St
i'• � Cam' Intermittent Stream
` 0 ,.
J , • Tributary Waters of US
t • 1a . • . • : ` Q � � Wetland
Ca •
A ~ Ponds
Princeton
• � Data Points
_ • ♦ �0� N 1 CJgp 0 Up
• � � 0 Wet
S Field Visits
Berkley Ln 1 Manchester Ln Crew:
J. Merritt,T.Fox, M. Deschamps,
• • ' - J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
� Dates:
(] April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
Z'::..........Z::" ♦ October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
•• s OJune 9 7-8,2021
FIGURE
Kahn-Rd (SR 1792)
• w � 3A
1 � •
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
gee to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
O� in Cumberland County
'\ m TIP Project 1-5987
Tobemor Robeson and
y `� Cumberland Counties, NC
Rd �� . �� Map Date:06/17/2021
J Wa
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
L^ m 0 200 400 800
• 6 �0)� 1 nI Dr Feet
`H � �� • • �� G'� Thls E,hlblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
• /7� aet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
56.1600). The ExM1ibit was compiled tram available information obtained ham the
YV,` anur es Ilstad below.Streams and Wetlantls All features located in J, field were
I recortled using a mapping grade Trimble OeoXT or Geo5000 OPS receiver with
supposedilll lling,tm accuracy.
1 1
Cricklewood St Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Englneerst Consultants(formerly Calyz)
t \ 1 1 t n , �► Aanal Photography:NCDOT

1 1 ► Legend
1 1 PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
1 � •
/� • Extension Study Area
• • • Potential Jurisdiction Features
1
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
• •
Tributary Waters of US
' Wetland
Q _J
L
• t _0 •
Ponds
S� Princeton
tp�
Data Points
VQi + Up
C 0 Wet
6 a� Field Visits
�13 Manchester Ln ��� Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. Deschamps,
0 J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
`Z • • • Dates:
• April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
% r August 3,7-9&13-14,
1 ` October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
.01 ! April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
.� , ,_•.• . (SR 1838) - - ► -• FIGURE
JEW-
Kahn-Rd (SR 1792) IF
3
11,012
a Field Verification Map
>>92J I-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
deer Dr to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
O� I in Cumberland County
1-0 \.�'d TIP Project 1-5987
CIO Wintergreen` Robeson and
r Cumberland Counties, NC
CAD J Map Date:06/17/2021
CD
Walnut Cove Dr -� y 1 inch =400 feet
CD
CD GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Dr �a
Feet
She G�/
Thls Ezhlblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
meet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NCAC
z 1600�. The Exh ibit
was Inn,ava compiled froilable if—tion obtained hom the
NV` ur es Ilsted below.Streams and Wetlantls'All features located in J, field were
corded using a mapping grade Tnmble Ge XT or Ge W00 GPS receive with
+ opposed sub-meteraccumcy.
•
Sources:NCDOT,NVS Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aenal Photography:NCDOT

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
� r
4�,I,�Ste Potential Jurisdiction Features
r/d Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
+ Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
• � � � � Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
a a Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
' August 3,7-9&13-14,
- _ October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
t s October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
iff IL JW AWN
• FIGURE
1
HUII St
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
en Dr ,� in Robeson County (Exit 20)
�eqe y to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
�o in Cumberland County
rgreer Rdr� •E T1R Robeson and
merP Project 87
ald Lake Dr (SR 2 Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
boo N 1 inch =400 feet
ek Dr a �
f� GRAPHIC SCALE
U � O � � 0 200 400 800
Feet
Hatfield Ct ° • Thls Exhlblt is for planning purposes only and Informahnn shown hereon does not
O + meet The Standards of Practice br Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NCAC
• 56.1600). The Exbibit was compiled from available information obtained hom the
`0 ur es listed below.Streams and Wetlantls'All f-,,located in J, field were
cord,d using a mapping grade Tnmble G-XT or G-W00 GPS receive r with
opposed sub-meter accuracy.
' Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyx)
dol p' Aenal Photography:NCDOT

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
. ' Extension Study Area
4 Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
e ® Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Co ri ht:©2013 National f 3D(a) 3D(b) Crew:
pY 9 � Copyright:©2013 National
cubed cubed J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
4mm a W wr 1 O J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
cif Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
�Q October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
St _ t 3D
See Inset
3D(a) Dun Field Verification Map
wee
s o Ra See Inset / 1-95 Widening from NC 211
Cy ` 3D(b) See Inset in Robeson County (Exit 20)
X V� `� —fir 3D(b) • to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
U) in Cumberland County
r(SR 2037 p — 0 TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
r� O- Map Date:06/17/2021
CD do
1 inch =400 feet
cp• GJrLg l GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
pua Rd R • Qo�gCs`�\\e Feet
f�R 2�36 y mhls Exhlbltis for planning purposes only and'information shown hereon does not
1 et The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NCAC
5fi.1 fi00). TM1e Exhibit was compiled from available information obtainetl hom[M1e
es listed below.Streams and Wetlands'All features located in Ne field were
• recorded using a mapping grade Trimble G-XT or G-W00 GPS receiver with
supposed sub-meter accuracy.
Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyx)
Aerial Photography:NCDOT
Cc

�a N Legend
S 3 PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
� ( t
-1
`Q� r Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
rl . E21` t • Perennial Stream
' �ocly�, •• Intermittent Stream
i� R (SR g[(SR^ ; Tributary Waters of US
s
25 �- Wetland
Ponds
Nows ---
Data Points
•
+ Up
• � • 1�' 0 Wet
Field Visits
�pL • Crew:
See Inset J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
3E(a) • J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
•
0 L000Il
Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
'1 October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
1+ April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
-dW — June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
owl
3E
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
Y in Robeson County (Exit 20)
I/� J • to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
S ' in Cumberland County
A d kYer
�GSt, TIP Project I-5987
+�
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
•
Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
• 3 E(a) Thls E,hiblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
aat The Standards of Practice br Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
g 66.1600). The Exhibit was compiled tram available information obtained ham the
Copy fight:©201 J Na4i urces listed below.Streams and Wetlands:All features located in J, field were
• 1 I• corded using a mapping grade Trimble OeoXT or Geo5000 OPS receiver with
C� o os pped sub-meter accuracy.
t
+ r ' Om fO Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Englneers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
�r qk`h, Aerial Photography:NCDOT
f' Copyright:©20

i I Legend
000, • (+ = PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
' ! Extension Study Area
• • ' Potential Jurisdiction Features
door �. •
+ Perennial Stream
—Tr1
' 9 Intermittent Stream
Ps • . vC — — Tributary Waters of US
� • O�
O � Wetland
�. 301 • ��`�� Ponds
• � ��U � Data Points
i + Up
0 Wet
• Crew:
+ Ndt��e . Field Visits
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
ti •_C/e� Rd (SR 1809)
Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
�i s" • • • August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
� and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
•
. Russ Rd FIGURE
3F
v •% 4SS�QQ,
Field Verification Map
f
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
r 1 TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
+ •' Cumberland Counties, NC
COr, ► � I Map Date:06/17/2021
cr
♦ • 1 inch =400 feet
�N
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
I Feet
Th mess Exhlbltis for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
et The Standards of Practice br Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NCAC
5fi.1 fi0 g). The Exhibit was compiled from available if—tion obtained hom the
es listed below.Streams antl Wetlands'All feaWres located in Ne field were
omfo ewer
rr....[[ corded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Geo8000 GPS re with
/,/-f���� • �� supposed sub-meter accuracy.
Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers•Consultants(formerly Calyz)
• Aerial Photography:NCDOT
f
`J Copyright:©20

Legend
e0iPJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
1
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Ur Wetland
�� Ponds
�
r � Data Points
t • +
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
I J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
1 _ _ Dates:
` April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
_ August 3,7-9&13-14,
f October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
Ali, 4 and February 12,March 20-22,
• April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
• ®m) - FIGURE
3G
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
iIn Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
' TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
�a
GRAPHIC SCALE
� 0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhlblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
_ et The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
55.1500). The Exhibit was compiled from available inf—ti-obtain,d bom the
es listed below.Streams and Wetlands All features located in nine field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble Ge XT or Ge W00 GPS receive with
supposed sub-meteraccurecy.
Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Call
Aerial Photography:NCDOT
Copyright:©2013

•
Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
r
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
— t �
1 � / Intermittent Stream
!N
Tributary Waters of US
IWetland
1 Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
I 0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
i ! J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
1 Dates:
I • I April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
Watts Dairy Rd Octobers 1 November 1&8 9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
—R
FIGURE
3 H
i
1 i
See Inset i ; Field Verification Map
3H(a)
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
1
TIP Project 1-5987
_ Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
" Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
1 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 I 0 200 400 800
I
j Feet
IThls Exhlblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
r et The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
5d,fi00). The Exhibit was compiled from available inf—ti-obtained bom the
es listed below.Streams and Wetlands All features located in nine field were
' r recorded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Ge W00 GPS receiver with
sup
J posed sub-meteraccumcy.
I J 3 H(a) Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Call
1 ' ' Aerial Photography:NCDOT
copyrlght:9 2U13 b2

er
Air
Legend
J
'�` PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
0 AVdff r
• ♦ r Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
• '
211 • � � f Intermittent Stream
c has -
�c�' '�� • Tributary Waters of US
J s
Wetland
Ponds
_ ! Data Points
J �` ! + Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
See Inset Crew:
31(a) J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
. April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 7-9&1
October 5,November
8-9mber 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
i
a J `
FIGURE
31 44
See Inset Field Verification Map
31(a)
I-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
♦� �' to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
r � � 0 +h Map Date:06/17/2021
i / I
r dot
1 inch =400 feet
10 GRAPHIC SCALE r
�. 0 200 400 800
Feet
Thi Exhibit is for planning purposes only and'information shown hereon does not
I(a) meet The Standards of Practice br Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NCAC
5fi.1,, Th.Exhibit was compiled from available information obtainetl hom[M1e
es listed below.Streams ani Wetlantls:All features tim,tl in Ne field were
Cop ry ig^h't©2013.Natiogal_GeograpY orded using a mapping grade Tnmble G-XT or Geo0000 GPS receiver with
cu bed s pposed sub-meter accu acy.
Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aerial Photography:NCDOT
� Copyright:©

1W) .1
0c
h Legend
�r
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
/ cy
Extension Study Area
,,6OJ Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
1000 M
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
' ! Wetland
Ponds
Brenfrank Dr Data Points
+ Up
L -�►� � � � 0 Wet
y
V Field Visits
V Crew:
r' M J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
O 1 J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
r,
r Dates:
t April 2 June July 6&20,
August 7-99&1
� October 5,November
8-9mber 1&8-9,2018
- — _ and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
eil
FIGURE
_ 3J
00 Field Verification Map
000 d0ft .r
` f I-95 Widening from NC 211
r
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
' to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
�-
/ TIP Project 1-5987
� Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
�C Map Date:06/17/2021
��Cr • — 1 inch =400 feet
os Fisher
GRAPHIC SCALE
9
r� all �a�s 0 200 400 800
�7 ` Feet
�r ���/ This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and'information shown hereon does not
meet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NCAC
55U1—). The Exhibit was compiled from available inf—nipn obtained hom the
w ces listed below.Streams and Wetlands All features located in nine field were
N� recorded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Geo8000 GPS receive with
sup
VV � posed sub-meter accuracy.
7 11 f 91 Sources.NCD rs OT,NV5 Enginee t Consultants(formerly Cell
• �S J Aerial Photography:NCDOT
9 - S�
d� Copyright:©

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
s— ; I�
1 � � Extension Study Area
1 Potential Jurisdiction Features
' •a
Perennial Stream
. Intermittent Stream
f , WNW- JA
Tributary Waters of US
-W4
® Wetland
moo r 1
Ponds
r V ' 1
Data Points
+ Up
U) 0 Wet
0
` Field Visits
j o� ,� ♦ • _ Crew:
n 4 J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
See Inset Dates:
rch Rd �SR 1760� 3K(b) M April 25-27,June July 6&20,
Chu 9 1
Cdar
Gro ' , ( Ocer 5,November 1 tob &8 9,2018
e
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
3K
1
See Inset
3K(a)
3K(b) , See Inset Field Verification Map
3K(b)
1-95 Widening from NC 211
t in Robeson County (Exit 20)
AdPl - to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
I
3K(a) TIP Project 1-5987
1 Robeson and
4 . Cumberland Counties, NC
- r Map Date:06/17/2021
-------�-- I 1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 0 200 400 800
Feet
1 Th etExhlblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
SfiUlrfiog). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtainetl from[M1e
cea Ilstetl below.Streams and mabl,G All features l 00 G in, ,all were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Geo8000 GPS receive r ith
Copyright:©2013 N pposedsub-meteraccu acy.
f 't . Sources:NCDOT,NVS Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aerial Photography:NCDOT
719W �►

I ( 1� 0
a , Legend
tf • PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
'`\ f • • Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Oak p
Intermittent Stream
1 • jIII
Tributary Waters of US
r► .. - 'V
s
Wetland
°akr/age . Ponds
K(a) Data Points
C p right: ��• + Up
t \ �*1 � -� • 0 Wet
Field Visits
See Inset Crew:
3L(a) A� J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
1 J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
op Dates:
_ April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
Piper Rd and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
or
FIGURE
ML 3L
Field Verification Map
11
I-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
\ 3L(b) _ ►� St in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
r Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
�1 ,ter i ' See Inset Map Date:06/17/2021
� 3L(b) '
•�'•�• C� i; wasp ~' 1 inch =400 feet
` ••�,•`•, �7//��� fi GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
� � •� pr N • Feet
Tbls Exhlbltia for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
`-_ - r, meet TM1e Standards of Practice br Land Surveying in North Carolina d, m th.
.Th The ExM1ibit was compiled from available information obtained from-
4 ) caa Il-d below.Streams and Wad-, All features located in Ne field were
L recorded using a mapping gmde Trimble G-XT or G-W00 GPS receiver with
s supposed sub-meteraccumcy.
0 CU
Copyright:©2013 Na om I Gcerg{phic Soviet ,i-cubed 0 t �-J Sources,NCDOT,NVS Engln—I Consultants(form,rly Calyx)
IL kn � . • Aerial PM1otography:NCDOT
' VJr (�
I'

m J Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
• , Extension Study Area
} Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
i
— Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
® Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
y + Up
0 Wet
• See Inset
3M(a) Field Visits
Copyright. 2013 National' 1 Crew:
cubed 'dill J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. Deschamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
� Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
_ October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
., April 19,May 10&14-15,
M October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
- ,.�- FIGURE
3 M
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
J in Robeson County (Exit 20)
f to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
_ TIP Project I-5987
' Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
• • y 1 inch =400 feet
� �.�. Pat ricia Dr �
ilkinson Dr ` � " ' -��� 1 • � - GRAPHIC SCALE
'jv W
1 � � 0 0 � � 0 200 400 800
� • f •
^ _ • • Feet
• • r !�cQ` • • ( _s Thee E.nma is mr lann�n ana�nrormauon shown hereon apes not
O ♦A I\�" • ; me P 9 purposes on y
et TM1e Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NCAC
S} O • ! Sfi.1 fi00). The Exhibit was compiled tram available information obtained ham the
Iv Ballance ` W gage , e Listed below Streams and Wetlands'Ali Natures located in Ne field were
recorded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Geo0000 GPS receive with
• . supposed sub-meter accuracy.
rf O` • Sources.NCDOT,NV5 Engineers.Consultants(formerly Calyz)
lY • ti Aerial PM1otography:NCDOT
N

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
• e-
0 Potential Jurisdiction Features
• Q� Perennial Stream
Fi • • Intermittent Stream
/ • • — — Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
9010
fI
3Q1 • ���� CP- Ponds
rN O�2 , Data Points
up
0 Wet
0� Field Visits
c ` Crew:
cc
m J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
■■ October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
■ ` and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
' • June 7-8,2021
f
�. FIGURE
a 3N
AV "
Ar` Field Verification Ma
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
t • in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
it\ Robeson and
• Cumberland Counties, NC
*4111111" �� � Map Date:06/17/2021
L 1 inch =400 feet
1
GRAPHIC SCALE
l 1
0 200 400 800
. ! / Feet
1 t Thls Exhlbltis for Planning purposes on lY antl Information shown hereon does not
meet TM1e Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina d, .NGAG
th.
5fi.lfiog). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtainetl from the
es Ilstetl below.Stre....
ms antl mabl,tls'All Natures l 00 G in Ne field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Geo8000 GPS receiver with
Pposed sub-meter accumcY.
g (�SDr SourcesNCDOT,NV5EnglneerstConsultants(formerlyCalyz)
N Aerial Photography:NCDOT
G

' Legend
= PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
Extension Study Area
� Danv ille Dr
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
'I Tributary Waters of US
1 Wetland
aim 1
Ponds
Data Points
�• + Up
0 Wet
A
Field Visits
t Crew:
•00% J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
` - f • - J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
/ April 25 27,June July 6&20,
August 7-99&1
October 5,November
8-9mber 1&8-9,2018
. � and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
PW FIGURE
30
Aff Field Verification Map
,/` / _
I-95 Widening from NC 211
Aol in Robeson County (Exit 20)
loll to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
i TIP Project 1-5987
`� aokERine d7� Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
ff amomow Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
now � 0 200 400 800
f Feet
Thl Exhlblt is for Planning Purposes only antl Information shown hereon does not
et TM1e Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina d NCAC
5fi.1 flee l The Exhibit was compiled from available information o in nnetl from the
u rces Il hetl below.Streams antl W r ibl, s'All Natures l 00 G in Ne field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Geo8000 GPS receiver with
su Pposed sub-meter accuracy.
Freedo ' So urces:NCD rs OT,NV5 Enginee t Consultants(formerly Cell
m Dr ' Aerial Photography:NCDOT
• FFreedom Dr
n
4

>\ r
�t Legend
,�— = PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
L
' Extension Study Area
O,� t` Potential Jurisdiction Features
.lop1 V d) V Perennial Stream
tJ ! Intermittent Stream
0 Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
1 Ponds
1 � '
1 Data Points
0 Wet
s Field Visits
1 � 1
i Crew:
1 J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
]� �, April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
` �r '4W � r + lab _' August 3,7-9&13-14,
low ` October+ ` + November and February Mar 8 018
0-2
April 19,May 10&14-15,
June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
3P
� 1
1 Field Verification Map
1
. � I-95 Widening from NC 211
1 in Robeson County (Exit 20)
' to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
44111 in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
' Map Date:06/17/2021
� , 1 1 inch =400 feet
�-
1 +� GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhlblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
• , meet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
5fi.1 fi00). The Exhibit was compiled from available inf—tip,obtained hom the
es Il-d below.Streams and Wetlantls:All features located in Ne field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble G-XT or Geo0000 GPS receiver with
supposed sub-meteraccurecy.
!
r Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
_ / � Aerial Photography:NCDOT
1
COP

t Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
O!
Extension Study Area
1;o
Ca , Potential Jurisdiction Features
sit Perennial Stream
` . Intermittent Stream
R ,�
O/))a Tributary Waters of US
n0 Dr
Oo�ti�e Lou DC ` _
/ Wetland
ti
�h Ponds
Data Points
Q' + Up
� L � Wet
Rustics Field Visits
a i J
• ; � Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
N
r ' C/) Dates:
April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
+A� October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
i June 7-8,2021
_ FIGURE
3Q
1 r m Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
! in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
�Qj � 1 r
t TIP Project I-5987
Q l Robeson and
it Cumberland Counties, NC
a� Dewitt Dr Map Date:06/17/2021 1 inch =400 feet
.a
Go 1 GRAPHIC SCALE
4�1 t 0 « 0 200 400 800
G ` Feet
Thls Exhlblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
maet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
66.1600). The Exhibit w ompiled tram available information obtained ham the
es listed below.Streams and Wetlands'All features located in J, field were
1 corded using a mapping grade Tmable G-XT or G-W00 GPS receiver with
opposed sub-meter accuracy.
Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Englneers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aedal Photography:NCDOT
L Cop

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
` Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
�w / Perennial Stream
' � Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
e��lt\� � Wetland
e � � Ponds
Data Points
' + Up
0 Wet
` 0a Field Visits
Q , Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
�! J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
• d
9- Dates:
April 25-27,June July 6&20,
1 August 3,7-99&13-14,
_ October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
rJune 7-8,2021
•
Buckhorn Rd (SR 1978t) FIGURE
3R
all
` s Field Verification Map
w �1 / •" 1-95 Widening from NC 211
` ^�^ r. _ in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
Gj pop in in Cumberland County
�a I ' 01111111, ` TIP Project 1-5987
COr
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
low GRAPHIC SCALE
1
' • 0 200 400 800
Feet
4 ' e m" hibh is for III Purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
et TM1e Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina d, mNGAG
th.
SfiU1,aa The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtainetl from the
1 es Il ad hall
below.Streams and Wallmaba,G All er G-l OO G in Ne field were
Z. / spprosed sub mapping
clura y.de Trimble GeoXT or Geo0000 GIPS receive with
� Sources:NCDOT,NVS Engineers Consultants-Consultants(formerly Call
va Aerial PM1oto raphy:NCDOT
• �� COp)

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
1 Extension Study Area
O/ Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
�a
Intermittent Stream
N' i Tributary Waters of US
• I Wetland
Ponds
a�
Data Points
l + Up
1
0 Wet
aw
Field Visits
1 � Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
fM
Dates:
April 2 June July 6&20,
August 3,7-99&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
�. AL October 14,2019.
S June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
3S
Field Verification Map
r' I-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
A� in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
1 Cumberland Counties, NC
' I • Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
Thla E.h'mh is for lannln es onl and'mformation shown hereon does not
et The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
55.150 g). The Exhibit was compiled from available inf—tip,obtained hom the
es Ilstetl below.Streams and mabl,tls'All features l 00 G in Ne field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Geo8000 GPS r...war with
/ supposed sub-meter accuracy.
y Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aerial Photography:NCDOT

Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
/ Extension Study Area
1
• Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
• � Intermittent Stream
• Tributary Waters of US
i ` . • Wetland
000,01 111
• 'Ale
• • Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
• 0 Wet
+ ti3 Field Visits
• >� d�5� � Crew:
• J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
t April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
r • October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
V April 19,May 10&14-15,
Ir
October 14,2019.
June 7-8,2021
• FIGURE
3T
t� (SR 2242)
Field Verification Map
t" [,�,- 1-95 Widening from NC 211
- • Aft �. ' in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
e
a�G j TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date:06/17/2021
1 Inch =400 feet
• ! GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Ilk
•� r.r•
Feet
0 mess Thnbh is for plan P purposes Land and'mforg m N shown hereon does not
00
/ et TM1e Standards of Practice for Land SurveYin9 in North Carolina(21 NCAC
5fiU1rfi0g). The Exhibit was compiled from available inf—ti-obtained hpm the
/ as listed below.Streams antl Wetlantls'All features loca[etl in Ne field were
7J recorded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Ge W00 GPS receive with
supposed sub-meter accuracy.
' Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Englneers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
b I Aerial Photn,,aphy:NCDOT

SR 22851
• Y1 an Rd Legend
sopf" PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
/ L10 i
• N1%1kk, Extension Study Area
a Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
�C r ' f 2 /�ry Intermittent Stream
I J0
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
301 ..+r . • v Data Points
• �/ LrLr + UP
* • • 0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. Deschamps,
Op �� J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
� s
• ��� 4 �—
~--�_, Dates:
• • , ' , ` April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
-9,2018
October 5,November 1&8 J� ��� and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
♦. .
June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
3 U
co
tiff ��
co l �Q �� �` Field Verification Map
5 �- ,,/
• C '� 1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
• . o to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
POWf in Cumberland County
•
•• �� TIP Project 1-5987
.• S Robeson and
• A Cumberland Counties, NC
/ Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
. � • .. GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
T Feet
Thl,..a Exhlbl[is for Pla Pr Purposes only antl Information shown hereon does not
maet The Standards n Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina d, .NGAG
th.
\e 56.160g�. TM1e Exhibit was compiled from available information obtainetl bom the
\ es Ilstetl below.Stre....
ms antl mabl,tls'All Natures loca[etl in Ne field were
• ��°�e recortletl using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or Geo13000 OPS receiver with
!V'� supposed sub-meter accurecy.
Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Englneers t Consultants(formerly Call
(IO e Aenal Photography:NCDOT
I

e
5�� r ` Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
L •
Extension Study Area
qj�
Potential Jurisdiction Features
J9L Perennial Stream
Annawood Dr - Bets
Intermittent Stream
O Tributary Waters of US
C
E �( Wetland
E p
Rya • Ponds
(D dBaggett
Data Points
+ Up
0 Wet
Balderson Field Visits
Ct Ackley Ln Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Belsky Ct Dates:
Bittware Ct April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
October 14,2019.
Shipman Rd (SR 2285) June 7-8,2021
•
-.- . FIGURE
:.� '. 3V
., 3�1 S �SR�'��) •
Field Verification Map
• ��
I-95 Widening from NC 211
_ in Robeson County (Exit 20)
O� to 1-95 Business in Cumberland County
xit )ounty
TIP Project 1-5987
t r 1 Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
t ♦ I
A � e j Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
T-Ezhlblt is for planning purposes only and Information shown hereon does not
,P et The Standards of Practice br Land Surveying in North Carolina(21 NG-
' Sd ,,g). TM1e Exhibit was compiled from available information obtainetl hom[M1e
u rces Ilsted below.Streams end Wetlands All features located in de fieldrw,,
supprosed sulb meters ciu-gads Trimble GeoXT or Geo0000 GPS receive with
` \ J
`� l , Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Engineers t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aerial Photography:NCOOT

,- Legend
PJD Verification Study Area(04.16.2020)
t d
30erson Walk R Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
I� YPerennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
M � �
��tPs dO- Wetland
Ponds
i � � � r� errs•~, Data Points
`j�•J + Up
0 Wet
I#kA'0 • Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt,T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
' J. Harrod,B.Levan,T. Hall
Dates:
dk April 25-27,June 20,July 6&20,
a • i +� August 3,7-9&13-14,
October 5,November 1&8-9,2018
• • and February 12,March 20-22,
April 19,May 10&14-15,
• October 19.
June 7-8,2021
FIGURE
3W
(SR2334)
Field Verification Map
I-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
/'�� • to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
~ in Cumberland County
TIP Project I-5987
Robeson and
1 y Cumberland Counties, NC
! Map Date:06/17/2021
1 inch =400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
t Feet
r ~� Thls f Exhlblt is for planning purposes only antl Information shown hereon does
..at
The Standards not
o Practice br Land Surveying m North Carolina(21 NCAC
66.1600). The Exhibit w o iled tram available information obtained ham the
• ces listed below.Streams an
tl Wetlands'All features located in Ne fieldwere
1 corded using a mapping glade Trimble GeoXT or Geo0000 GPS receive r with
u os
Pped sub-meter accuracy.
Sources:NCDOT,NV5 Englneela t Consultants(formerly Calyz)
Aerial Photography:NCDOT
ll�

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1 SAA
Date:Jun 7, 2021 Project/Site:1-5987 Latitude:34.810348
Evaluator:Jennifer Harrod/NV5 County: Robeson Longitude:-78.98285101
Total Points: Other:
E Stream Determination:
Stream is at least intermittent if Intermittent e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 i
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =9 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 1
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No - 0 Yes - 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =7) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =7.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0
perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet)
-Gambusia in pools,small crayfish sparse. Bankfull Width (feet) 5
Water Depth inches 1-3
Channel Substrate silt
Velocity: low
Clarit lightly Turbid
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1 SAB
Date:Jun 8, 2021 Project/Site:1-5987 Latitude:34.7537939
Evaluator:Jennifer Harrod/NV5 County: Robeson Longitude:-78.99420029
Total Points: Other:
24.5 . Stream Determination:
Stream is at least intermittent if Intermittent e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =8.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 1
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No - 0 Yes - 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =9.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 2
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =0.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0
perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 7
-Gambusia in pools Bankfull Width (feet) 4
Water Depth inches 2-3
Channel Substrate Silt
Velocity: low
Clarity: slightly Turbid
Sketch:

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): 1-5987 2. Date of evaluation: 06/07/2021
3.Applicant/owner name: NCDOT 4.Assessor name/organization: Jennifer Harrod/NV5
5. County: Robeson 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Lumber on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Big Marsh Swamp
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 34.810348,-78.98285101
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): SAA 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 690
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 4 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ®No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ® Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A.
valley shape(skip for ❑B
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (<0.1 mil) ®Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mil) ❑Size 3(0.5 to<5 miz) ❑Size 4(>-5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
®B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
®A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue, unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, N ❑F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) r m ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R)= present but< 10%, Common (C)_ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ >40-70%, Predominant(P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel(2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d. ®Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ®Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ®Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ®Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
®F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ®C ❑C ®C From 30 to<50 feet wide
®D ❑D ®D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ®A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
❑A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ®B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
®C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ❑No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name 1-5987 Date of Assessment 06/07/2021
Stream Category la2 Assessor Name/Organization Jennifer Harrod/NV5
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Microtopography LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW LOW
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat LOW LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat LOW MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): 1-5987 2. Date of evaluation: 06/08/2021
3.Applicant/owner name: NCDOT 4.Assessor name/organization: Jennifer Harrod/NV5
5. County: Robeson 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Lumber on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cowpen Branch
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 34.7537939,-78.99420029
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): SAB 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 526
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 7 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ®No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ® Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A.
valley shape(skip for ❑B
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (<0.1 mil) ®Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mil) ❑Size 3(0.5 to<5 miz) ❑Size 4(>-5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
®C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
®A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue, unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, N ❑F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation YC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) r m ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R)= present but< 10%, Common (C)_ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ >40-70%, Predominant(P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel(2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d. ®Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
® ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ®Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ®Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
®F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ®B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ®C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
®E ❑E ®E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
®E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
®D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
❑A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ®B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
®C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ❑No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name 1-5987 Date of Assessment 06/08/2021
Stream Category la2 Assessor Name/Organization Jennifer Harrod/NV5
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Microtopography LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability LOW LOW
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat LOW LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(3) In-stream Habitat LOW MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 06/07/2021
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAD-Wet
Investigator(s): J. Harrod,T. Hall Section,Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.68681092 Long:-78.99990035 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Raines fine sandy loam NWI classification: PFO1/2F
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Marl Deposits(1315)(LRR U) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) X Moss Trim Lines(1316)
—Water Marks(131) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WAD-Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Nyssa biflora 55 Yes OBL Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum 15 No FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 No FAC Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
85 =Total Cover OBL species 85 x 1 = 85
50%of total cover: 43 20%of total cover: 17 FACW species 75 x 2= 150
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FAC species 35 x 3= 105
1. Nyssa biflora 30 Yes OBL FACU species 0 x 4= 0
2. Persea borbonia 20 Yes FACW UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3. Column Totals: 195 (A) 340 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.74
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. X 3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
50 =Total Cover -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Arundinaria tecta 55 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6 height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
it. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
55 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 28 20%of total cover: 11 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 3 20%of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WAD-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-1 Duff layer
1-18 10YR 2/1 80 10YR 4/2 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
2.5YR 4/4 10 C M Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
—Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B,153D) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) (outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Reduced Vertic(F18)
—Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) —Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A,15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P,T, U) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
—Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) X Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 15313)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(At 1) —Marl(F10)(LRR U) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O,P,T) (outside MLRA 138,152A in FL,154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O,S) X Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) _Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B,153D)
_Sandy Redox(S5) —Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,1506) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T, U) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL,154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 06/07/2021
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAE-Wet
Investigator(s): J. Harrod,T. Hall Section,Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): none Slope(%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.68972218 Long:-78.99890181 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Raines sandy loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Marl Deposits(1315)(LRR U) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Moss Trim Lines(1316)
—Water Marks(131) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WAE-wet
Absolute Uominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: FACW species 40 x 2= 80
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FAC species 25 x 3= 75
1. Acer rubrum 10 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
2. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3. Column Totals: 80 (A) 170 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.13
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. X 3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
10 =Total Cover -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Osmunda cinnamomea 40 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Microstegium vimineum 15 Yes FAC be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Juncus effusus 15 Yes OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6 height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
it. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
70 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WAE-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 5/1 10 D M Loamy/Clayey
6-18 10YR 2/1 60 10YR 5/1 20 D M Loamy/Clayey
10YR 3/2 20 C M Faint redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
—Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B,153D) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) (outside MLRA 150A)
X Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Reduced Vertic(F18)
—Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) —Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A,15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P,T, U) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
—Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) X Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) X Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 15313)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(At 1) —Marl(F10)(LRR U) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O,P,T) (outside MLRA 138,152A in FL,154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O,S) X Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) _Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B,153D)
_Sandy Redox(S5) —Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,1506) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T, U) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL,154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 06/07/2021
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAF-Wet
Investigator(s): J. Harrod,T. Hall Section,Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.7893053 Long:-78.99392036 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Raines sandy loam NWI classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) —Marl Deposits(1315)(LRR U) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Moss Trim Lines(1316)
—Water Marks(131) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WAF-wet
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum 35 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 8 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
75 =Total Cover OBL species 35 x 1 = 35
50%of total cover: 38 20%of total cover: 15 FACW species 95 x 2= 190
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FAC species 100 x 3= 300
1. Arundinaria tecta 50 Yes FACW FACU species 0 x 4= 0
2. Persea palustris 45 Yes FACW UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3. Column Totals: 230 (A) 525 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.28
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8. X 3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
95 =Total Cover -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50%of total cover: 48 20%of total cover: 19
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Woodwardia virginica 20 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Juncus effusus 15 Yes OBL be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6 height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
it. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
35 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 18 20%of total cover: 7 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Vitis rotundifolia 15 Yes FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
25 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WAF-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 2/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-18 10YR 5/1 95 2.5YR 4/4 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
—Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 15313,153D) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) (outside MLRA 150A)
X Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Reduced Vertic(F18)
—Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A,15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P,T, U) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
—Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) X Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 15313)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface(At 1) —Marl(F10)(LRR U) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O,P,T) (outside MLRA 138,152A in FL,154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O,S) _Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) _Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B,153D)
_Sandy Redox(S5) —Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,1506) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T, U) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL,154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 06/07/2021
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WAD-wAF up
Investigator(s): J. Harrod,T. Hall Section,Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.718043 Long:-78.993976 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains Find Sandy Loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Marl Deposits(1315)(LRR U) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
—Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Moss Trim Lines(1316)
—Water Marks(131) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Water-Stained Leaves(139) Sphagnum Moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WAD-WAF Up
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum 40 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Nyssa biflora 5 No OBL That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
45 =Total Cover OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
50%of total cover: 23 20%of total cover: 9 FACW species 0 x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FAC species 47 x 3= 141
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 5 Yes FACU FACU species 12 x 4= 48
2. Ligustrum sinense 2 Yes FAC UPL species 5 x 5= 25
3. Liriodendron tulipifera 2 Yes FACU Column Totals: 69 (A) 219 (B)
4. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.17
5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. 2 Dominance Test is>50%
8. 3 Prevalence Index is:53.0'
9 =Total Cover -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Fragaria vesca 5 Yes UPL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex spp. 2 Yes be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6 height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
9.
10.
Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
7 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 4 20%of total cover: 2 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU
2. Rubus argutus 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WAD-WAF Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/2 95 10YR 5/8 5 C M Loamy/Clayey
3-12 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 5/8 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
12-18 10YR 6/2 90 10YR 5/8 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
_Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck(S12) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
—Black Histic(A3) (MLRA 153B,153D) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) (outside MLRA 150A)
X Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Reduced Vertic(F18)
—Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T, U) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (outside MLRA 150A,15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P,T, U) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,T)
—Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) X Redox Depressions(F8) (MLRA 15313)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(At 1) —Marl(F10)(LRR U) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O,P,T) (outside MLRA 138,152A in FL,154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O,S) _Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) _Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix(TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B,153D)
_Sandy Redox(S5) —Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,1506) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T, U) _Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils(F20)
_Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S,T, U) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL,154) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG,JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain—Version 2.0

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name 1-5987 Date of Evaluation 06/08/2021
Applicant/Owner Name NCDOT Wetland Site Name WAE
Wetland Type Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh Assessor Name/Organization Jennifer Harrod/NV5
Level III Ecoregion Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Nearest Named Water Body Fivemile Branch
River Basin Lumber USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040203
County Robeson NCDWR Region Fayetteville
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 34.68972218, -78.99890181
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches,dams, beaver dams,dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage,disease,storm damage,salt intrusion,etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration(examples: mowing,clear-cutting,exotics,etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW,or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal(if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate],exotic species,grazing,less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically,alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples:draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling,excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
®C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure-assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations,depletions,or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>- 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland-opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank,underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
®B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate,or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration,dead vegetation,excessive
sedimentation,odor)
6. Land Use-opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ®A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >-20%coverage of pasture
❑D ®D ❑D >-20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ®E ❑E >-20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ®F ❑F >-20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer-assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
❑Yes ®No If Yes,continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the.water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >-50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed,combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑<- 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
[-]Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
❑Sheltered-adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed-adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area-wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
®F ❑F From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation(<7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut,select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
®H ®H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑I ❑I ®I From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ®D From 10 to<50 acres
®E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ®No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option"C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes,continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
®A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed,or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
T
o❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
1= ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
.0 ❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ®C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams,and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAE Date of Assessment 06/08/2021
Wetland Type Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh Assessor Name/Organization Jennifer Harrod/NV5
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Particulate Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Soluble Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Physical Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

1-5987 PJD Addendum
}i G
Wetland WAD-1 looking east Wetland WAD-2 looking east
rt: `
Wetland WAE-1 looking south Wetland WAE-2 looking north
Ott
Kam '
..rie
t .
Tributary TAB facing west Tributary TAD looking east toward SAB

5 C'C
1t
s� •.� is"` .n^' 'sy"`1�J`'�y .
1