20211028 Ver 1_Riparian Buffer Authorization Request_20210618

Buffer Authorization Application Form
15ANCPC 02B .0233 (8)(b), .0243 (8)(b), .0250 (11)(b), .0259 (8)(b), .0267 (11)(c), .0607 (e)(2) Buffer Authorization Online Form -
Update 10/23/2018
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Original Submittal 6/18/2021
A. Owner/Applicant Information
General Information
Primary Contact Email:*
Who is submitting the application?*
[e-mail]
Reese list the contact person's email for questions or payment on this project if needed.
▪ Owner
❑ Applicant other than Owner
El Agent
Is there an agent working on this application C Yes
but not submitting it? O No
1. Property Owner Information:
.....................................................................................................
la. Name on Recorded Deed:*
1b. Responsible Party:
lc. Mailing Address:*
Id. Telephone:*
9198645418
Christopher and Kerry Shearer
(for Corporations)
Street Address
9201 Cub Trail
Address Line City
Raleigh
Fbstal / Zip Code
27615-3999
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1a. Name of Project:*
State / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
US
1e. Email Address:* [e-mail]
m
Shearer Screening in of Existing Deck
(Subdivision, facility, or establishrrent narre)
1b. Is this a publicly -funded transportation project?*
r Yes
C No
Id. Subdivision Name: Durant Trace
le. Nearest Raleigh
Municipality:
1f. Property Size: 0.25
acres

1g. County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
1 h. Property ID# Date of Purchase
17280325551
Tax RN or Parcel id
Deed Information
3/30/2012
Type of Book
Book#
Deed
Map
14709
1728
Page#
1100
13
1j. Attach a copy of the recorded map that indicates when the lot was last platted.
aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
R2064301 -8X14 -05-25-21.pdf 367.01KB
FCF only
1k. How would you like to provide the Latitude and Longitude information?*
r Address Lookup
C Manually
Address Lookup
Street Address
9201 Cub Trail
Address Line 2
City State / Rovince / legion
Raleigh NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
27615-3999 US
Latitude* 35.9021485 Longitude* -78.5939174
11. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties?*
r Yes
6' No
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Falls Lake
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:*
2c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:*
0
(linear feet only)
3. Project Description:
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This is a suburban lot with partial tree cover. Stormwater stream runs at property
line. Only used in strong storms.

3b. Attach an 8'/z x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the site.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
NC_Bayleaf_20190730_TM_geo.pdf 112.86MB
FCF only
3c. Attach an 8'/z x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map depicting the
project site.
gickthe upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
20210618_08532108304_4_Soil_Report.pdf 755.81 KB
FCF only
4. Proposed Activity
Provide a detailed description of the proposed activity including its purpose and include the type of equipment to be used:*
Existing deck built during house construction in 1995. With approval, we wish to add
a roof and make the deck a screened in porch. No additional size will be added, will
be using same deck as currently exists and just adding a roof.
Attach a site plan as applicable to the project:
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
siteplan9201 cub.pdf
FCF only
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
541.01 KB
5a. Have jurisdictional wetlands or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this
property/project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes
6' No
6. Project History
6a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
fr Yes
r No
6b. List any permits/approvals that have been requested or obtained for this project in the past.
Application Date
8/21/2020
Date Issued
6/18/2021
Permit Type
Building
6c. Please explain and detail according to "help file" instructions.*
Permit/approval above is still pending due to stormwater concerns in City of Raleigh.
Date issued is just today's date, permit still not issued.
7. Future Project Plans
7a. Is this project a phased project?*
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Buffer Impacts
.......................................................................................................................................
Project is in which protected Basin?*
r Yes
' No

C' Neuse River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0233)
C Catawba River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0243)
C5 Randleman Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0250)
✓ Tar -Pamlico River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0259)
✓ Jordan Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0267)
✓ Goose Creek Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0606 & 15A NCAC 02B.0607)
Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
Site# - Reason
Stream Name
Buffer Impact*
Impact Type*
Zone 1
Zone 2
Deck 1
Map label (e.g. Finad
Crossing 1)
Unnamed
Tributary
Permanent
(P)
Fbrmor Terrp
Allowable
0.00
Square
fit
Square
Feet
Total Zone 1 Impacts: 0.00
Total Zone 2 Impacts: 0.00
Total Buffer Impacts: 0.00
Comments:
Since the existing deck (and newly proposed roof) are just outside of the Zone 1
and Zone 2 buffers, I assume I do not need to record any sq feet of impact.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project.*
Since the existing deck is outside of the two zones (50'), we assume there is no
need for avoidance. We are keeping the same deck structure and just adding a roof
to the structure, which will of course also be outside of the two zones. There is also
already a silt fence put in at 50' of the buffer for construction.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.*
ALready installed a silt fence at 50' from stream bank (top).
E. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. What type of SCM are you providing?*
✓ Level Spreader
✓ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
✓ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
17 Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
✓ Other SCM that removed minimum of 30% nitrogen
lc. Diffuse Flow Documentation*
F. Supplementary Information
Environmental Documentation
aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docunent
R2064301 -8X14-05-25-21.pdf 367.01 KB
FCF only
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
C Yes
C' No

Violations
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR
Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
r Yes
C No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact buffer authorization application?
C Yes
C' No
G. Additional Information
Please upload any additional information you would like the Division to consider during application review.
Additional Attachments:
Additional Comments:
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
FCF only
Please consult R2064301-8x14-05-25-21.pdf, as it shows the existing silt fence and
how the top o f the bank and existing project have more than 50'. We are just
looking to add a roof for a screened porch on an existing deck. No additions have
been added. The silt fence is at the 50' buffer line and you can see that the deck
project is outside of the buffer.
H. Sign and Submit
By digitally signing below, I certify that:
o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act")
o I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act");
o I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the application form."
Print Name:* Christopher Shearer
Signature
otli1P1400
Submission Date: (Auto populated field)

Initial Review
Is this accepted into the review process?* O Yes in No
Is this project a public transportation
project? *
O Yes
C' No
ID#* 20211028
Version:* 1
Select Reviewer: Rick Trone:eads\rvtrone
Select Reviewing Office* Central Office - [phone]
Has payment been received?* f: No Payment Needed
✓ Fee Received
✓ Need Fee - send electronic notification

M USGS
'� 36.0000.
85
e4
83
82
81
ea
]8
A
]6
25
]4
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
04
05
06
02
CUSTopo
OB
09
10
BAYLEAF QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
TS-MINUTE SERIES
W
\. _., q
1 le
O
( ',
y -
�
.1.,
i
.,y,c,„
/As
e. ,
I
,,,,,,„
i '
.
ji'
#6
"• Lj 444'
"
.
"
o
0 '-' 2-1 \r'4& , `1444A
i ,4
1 .L .
:2
Q�
. _
-
V
lit
I )D�
W
I "."...
al
5. .... „,
ror rt
1 :i 1 kVA
•,L./P=. Ia�
b.
Of
---?/\_ 7-#.,
'-\s--, ----k*
I
Jr
0,2
°
-!
*,r7atirtic
Dom
_
gif ‘
.
p., '-,
fox(
x „.0. )515a.r._.,
., v i
t-t
..., ,:,
lasmaamigmb
‘4 ii-
....
.-----7A- -yr>)
_. -....- PO
.".
'''---.
N,
6/
tii.LA
.0*
,,,,,,..14-4---ew
'WWII
M
Mr
°`�
-a r
i.14,r1,1,,,,
=
...
-% a—,
,fie
trrfi"r,'
.171i
i
le
-
5 - -5
�� srs !b
y
�, IOW
•
Jam'
Au
o
7
®
�,,��5 g
�Ya
ds
Tre
la "
yY
l
."(
Y. ffr
0 ,,./r-o)r-r,nra
( re
‘10...11141'r,
- -
-.‘ vit
r
1
Ft Si ,
04
05
06
02
00
09
10
13
14®"E
eb
85
e4
83
82
ea
]8
A
]6
]5
]4
SCALE 1:24 000
1111...1411,1
MU CLASSIFICATION
11V^. Dus 0--H.
BAYLEAF, NC
MIS

USDA United States
Department of
Agr culture
RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
June 18, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 9
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 11
Map Unit Descriptions 11
Wake County, North Carolina 13
CfC—Cecil-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes 13
PbD—Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes 14
References 16
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8

M„9Z,S£ 08L
0
0
4)
4)
0
L
= 0_
0 CO
a)
LL•0
0 U)
E
0
0
8
8
—
r
M „bb,S£ 08L
Ob65L6£
Ob65L6£
z
0069L6£
0985L6£
OZ85L6£
M „9Z S£ 08L
8
8
Map Scale: 1:2,060 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
z
— M„bb,S£ 08L
0065L6£ 0985L6£ OZ85L6£ O9L5L6£ ObL5L6£ OOL5L6£ 0995L6£
z

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP INFORMATION
MAP LEGEND
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
ai
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
■
Special Line Features
1
Special Point Features
E
{
0
measurements.
) ce
\
( I ! 1 §
ources
co
] _ 092
e{G� \ k'-
/«f)- - R
\kE : § %y
{/�\ ocE
co
)
\owW ct 20 :cCo2a'0all-))_
on'-,-=c=k
/ (L 00 $ 3§22
\ § §\ a-ojm'7
D / o{</
\ \\ j0 {\ /\ Eƒc
/ /t/ƒ\ ]EE
\.\ -wF2\ 0
\
)\6 u-<EW 3 - -
//§o# E 2
m 2
ƒ(/ /\}co\ _ /0 2 /E
m Ego-0 o =0 \§-
2 12 \/ E0 /\ \5_ /
\f¥
\\\ //\\j /\ \j \) O- &Sf§
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Local Roads
m e A z ° ® » § ! ® / L _ (
0 \ 0) 2 - _ _ - = 2 d = -
2
£ a)® e ; k a 3 a:§ u§ : 3
5 Z K 0 X'< 0 1# 0 0 > + y$ A k
i
Sodic Spot

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CfC
Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to
10 percent slopes
12.1
96.5%
PbD
Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10
to 15 percent slopes
0.4
3.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
12.5
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
CfC—Cecil-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xh9k
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Cecil and similar soils: 55 percent
Urban land: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cecil
Setting
Landform: I me rfl u ves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or saprolite derived
from schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 42 inches: clay
BC - 42 to 50 inches: clay loam
C - 50 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material: Impervious layers over human transported material
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Udorthents, loamy
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: I me rfl u ves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
PbD—Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xhb4
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 60 percent
Urban land: 30 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet
Setting
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 27 inches: clay
BC - 27 to 35 inches: clay loam
C - 35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material: Impervious layers over human transported material
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Udorthents, loamy
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid =nres 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/deta i l/so i is/scie ntists/?cid=nres 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www. n res. usda.gov/I nternet/FSE_DOCU M ENTS/n res142p2_052290. pdf
17

(ESCRIPTION: CHANGING REAR PORCH
RECORDED: D.B. 14709, PG 1100, MB 1995, PG 141
ADDRESS: 9201 CUB TRL.,RALEIGH, NC 27615
COUNTY/STATE: WAKE/NC DATE: 10/27/2020
SCALE OF DRAWING: 1"=30' DRAWN BY: G.M.
ZONED: R-4 REVIEWED BY: SWM
PARCEL ID NUMBER: 1728-03-2551
SITE DATA
ZONING: R-4
LOT SIZE
N/A
PRIMARY STREET
20' MIN
SIDE STREET
15' MIN
SIDE LOT LINE
10' MIN
REAR LOT LINE
30' MIN
BUILDING HEIGHT
40'
IMPERVIOUS MAX
38%
CURVE
RADIUS
ARC LENGTH
CHORD LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
DELTA ANGLE
C1
1060.79'
76.34'
76.32'
S 26'39'14" E
4'07'23"
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF
RALEIGH AND NCDOT STANDARDS
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
AREA SUMMARY
LOCATION
HOME
AC
PORCH
WALLS
SQ. FT.
10,709 18 EOP
91
16
DRIVE/WALK 843
DECK (50%) 86
TOTAL COVERAGE =
2,390 SQ. FT. OR 22.3%
N /F
JOSEPH & JUDITY
MILLER
PIN 1728-03-2517
DB 9960, PG 436
0
oocazFL)
LJ uj O Q J
F W} J 2 W d
U ct w U Z ZW
a 0
U, J <
m CO a 0 OU W
FEW)-P
O 0 M Z J CeW
Z Z Q D 0Ce
}1 F W 0z cc
Ci
1— LA
a Z Q U W w Z
MQU: oceO
(n } OJ J OO Z O
d J
Q 0 W W W
owm�
In U o
PRELIMINARY PLAT, NOT FOR
RECORDATION, CONVEYANCES, OR SALES.
THIS PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY ALL
STATE AND LOCAL REVIEWING
AUTTHORITIES FOR CONCURRENCE WITH
SITE ZONING AND CODE OF ORDINANCES.
CUB TRAIL
55' PUBLIC R/W
EOP
R/W
CONTROL
CORNER
3/4" OTP
1,1
N/F
TRAVIS & SOFIA
COLE
PIN 1728-03-1407
DB 17719, PG 530
W
ro
r7
m
0
z
3/4"
OTP
>✓CiI�C:
C1
PLANTER
20' BSL
FFE: 359.25'
O
10.8
1, 20'.0`9 D1 1 / PORCH
2 STORY /Z1e./
BRICK
/GFE: 357.67'
11.2'
0
4•O/F
JX SU� G� oml
/t0
0
18.9'/
DECK
f4
3/4"
OTP
es ;
30
LOT
84
4'
EOP
EOP
R/W
REFERENCE
5/8" REBAR
0i
(0
in
co
In
0
O
O
3/4"
OTP
N /F
VIVIAN & BRYAN
FEDEROWICZ
PIN 1728-03-1462
DB 16906, PG 151
N /F
BRIAN W. RIDGELY
PIN 1728-03-2495
DB 8383, PG 474
HEATHROW
DURANT TRACE SECTIO
PIN 1728032551
0.246 ACRES
10,709 SQUARE FEET
TOP OF BANK
REVISED 05-25-21
TO SHOW SILT
FENCE & RIPARIAN
BUFFER
4
NORTH
NC GRID
NAD 83 (2011)
SCALE: 1"=30'
WAS PREPARED
FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE
LEGEND :
O PROPERTY CORNER
FOUND (AS NOTED)
5/8" REBAR WITH
CAP SET
Al FIRE HYDRANT
WATER METER
1111,
© COPYRIGHT 2020
BOUNDARY ZONE, INC.
THIS DRAWING AND IT'S
REPRODUCTIONS ARE
THE PROPERTY OF THE
SURVEYOR AND MAY
NOT BE REPRODUCED,
PUBLISHED OR USED IN
ANY WAY WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
` BOUNDARY ZONE, INC.
WATER VALVE
GAS METER
GAS VALVE
POWER METER
POWER BOX
A/C UNIT
MANHOLE
SIGN
m
1445.61
1
CLEAN OUT
JUNCTION BOX
DRAINAGE INLET
CABLE BOX
TELEPHONE BOX
POWER POLE
ELEVATIONS
BOU N DARK.
LAND SURVEYING SERVICES
zo nC. & LAND PLANNING SERVICES
SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING
EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT
R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
OH OVERHANG
CTP CRIMP TOP PIPE
OTP OPEN TOP PIPE
BSL SETBACK LINE
CONC. CONCRETE
WWW.BOUNDARYZONE.COM [phone] [phone]
CORPORATE OFFICE
454 SATELLITE BLVD.
SUITE 200
SAWANEE, GA 30024
RALEIGH OFFICE
8024 GLENWOOD AVE
SUITE 109
RALEIGH, NC 27612
GRAPHIC SCALE - IN FEET
NOT VALID WITHOUT
ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
0vomill:///
CAR0
O
O lei C i l u�����`��
10/27/2020
FOR THE FIRM
BOUNDARY ZONE, INC.
FIRM NUMBER: C-3534
PROJECT
R20643-01
SHEET
lOFl
15 0
30
60

V "LZOZ'L
a3sin3a
a2sin2a
a3sin3a
kenigoj 'AupJnleg 31va
a3NN3f19 AHN3H :1,9 NMVH 1
ueld al!S'S posodoad
I!ealan3 TOM
suoDEEJaIIV ?2 uo!:!ppb
■03
ieliie3 3l
w Lm m
00 v a w
O z w u N°� LL
w tY n li
w z L., ow LY
Q w W 4 aF LPA
O Q m = w oLL `n�o
_ L n s
m 0. LL c� �nwsa
`r iiU O Z LL¢ LLw¢ wuJ
L.0) gyp¢d<
¢
Y z 6' _ �¢m ¢dJwu Jti
l d » OJ
O 0,_ N U F ¢ Q a w m
fil W N NUC' d�5>�U ¢
f w (Y O ¢Z ✓1�w ¢w� -gip
Q w Ul CO , �f1w> w¢gO.
w z w 0 NN x�a��wo
Q 01 z Q O I. w� O a 51- ¢ m
V▪ )
7
w
LL 0
T1-I S IS NOT A SURVEY
Q
O
0
,n0Y'
0
3/16" = 1'-0"
w
d
0

93sIn3H
/ 7
EOE L
30Vd
a3SIA2H
:a3SIA3H
Anmga3'Aepimes Siva
H3NNON9 AHN3H :A9 NMVH9
sM8!A ueld
I!aalgn3 TOM
suo!leJe ijuo!I!ppy
No3
ie n3 31
/
r
8.E
01313 NI 31V001
---
'0'. s3ssna.L JO01,1 a3?J33 NIFN3
O z
w= ww
ZL., U wm�
ix Jzw
U d n 7 7
E
NNa
N
N w
.cL_ p
ti
d
/
„0-,9
jtN-ii '1
EXISTING DWELLING
/
.A-,ZT
.11
41
01
01
41
01
41
01
z
0
1-
0
z
0
z
1-
X
w
0
4
0
LL
SCALE: 1/4" _
0
4

a3sin3H
V / LZOE L
:20Vd
a3SIAal
:a3sin3H
Anmgaj'Aepimeg 31Va
H3NNON9 AHN3H :A9 NMHH9
u0ilen8I3 41JON
I!aalgn3 TOM
suo!leJe uo!I!ppy
■03
aape3 31
GUARDRAIL PEP CODE
T
[v

/1.7
VLZOZ'L
:30Vd
a3SIA3H
a3SIn3H
AienUgo 'Aepin9es 31Va
H3NNON9 AHN3H :A9 NMHH9
suogena13 9 suopas
I!walgn0 ZOZ6
suo!Je py ? uo!I!ppy
.03
Aepe3 31
O
4
4
SCALE: 3/16 = 1 -O
z
zw
LL U
z
CC 0
0 OU
CL
0
,91111111111111111111111111
P111111111111111111111111111
/ 1111111111111111111111111111
01111111111111111111111111111111
Z
w w
¢ Z
U Q
cn a
S a
O
O
a
0
1- L
I1
I
I
I
U
Z
O
U
0
Z p
0a
o�
0
0
m
Q
z3
N
a N
lc)
7 O
0
111
4
1-
SCALE: 3/8"
SCALE: 3/16" = 11-0"

(ESCRIPTION: CHANGING REAR PORCH
RECORDED: D.B. 14709, PG 1100, MB 1995, PG 141
ADDRESS: 9201 CUB TRL.,RALEIGH, NC 27615
COUNTY/STATE: WAKE/NC DATE: 10/27/2020
SCALE OF DRAWING: 1"=30' DRAWN BY: G.M.
ZONED: R-4 REVIEWED BY: SWM
PARCEL ID NUMBER: 1728-03-2551
SITE DATA
ZONING: R-4
LOT SIZE
N/A
PRIMARY STREET
20' MIN
SIDE STREET
15' MIN
SIDE LOT LINE
10' MIN
REAR LOT LINE
30' MIN
BUILDING HEIGHT
40'
IMPERVIOUS MAX
38%
CURVE
RADIUS
ARC LENGTH
CHORD LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
DELTA ANGLE
C1
1060.79'
76.34'
76.32'
S 26'39'14" E
4'07'23"
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF
RALEIGH AND NCDOT STANDARDS
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
AREA SUMMARY
LOCATION
HOME
AC
PORCH
WALLS
SQ. FT.
10,709 18 EOP
91
16
DRIVE/WALK 843
DECK (50%) 86
TOTAL COVERAGE =
2,390 SQ. FT. OR 22.3%
N /F
JOSEPH & JUDITY
MILLER
PIN 1728-03-2517
DB 9960, PG 436
0
oocazFL)
LJ uj O Q J
F W} J 2 W d
U ct w U Z ZW
a 0
U, J <
m CO a 0 OU W
FEW)-P
O 0 M Z J CeW
Z Z Q D 0Ce
}1 F W 0z cc
Ci
1— LA
a Z Q U W w Z
MQU: oceO
(n } OJ J OO Z O
d J
Q 0 W W W
owm�
In U o
PRELIMINARY PLAT, NOT FOR
RECORDATION, CONVEYANCES, OR SALES.
THIS PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY ALL
STATE AND LOCAL REVIEWING
AUTTHORITIES FOR CONCURRENCE WITH
SITE ZONING AND CODE OF ORDINANCES.
CUB TRAIL
55' PUBLIC R/W
EOP
R/W
CONTROL
CORNER
3/4" OTP
1,1
N/F
TRAVIS & SOFIA
COLE
PIN 1728-03-1407
DB 17719, PG 530
W
ro
r7
m
0
z
3/4"
OTP
>✓CiI�C:
C1
PLANTER
20' BSL
FFE: 359.25'
O
10.8
1, 20'.0`9 D1 1 / PORCH
2 STORY /Z1e./
BRICK
/GFE: 357.67'
11.2'
0
4•O/F
JX SU� G� oml
/t0
0
18.9'/
DECK
f4
3/4"
OTP
es ;
30
LOT
84
4'
EOP
EOP
R/W
REFERENCE
5/8" REBAR
0i
(0
in
co
In
0
O
O
3/4"
OTP
N /F
VIVIAN & BRYAN
FEDEROWICZ
PIN 1728-03-1462
DB 16906, PG 151
N /F
BRIAN W. RIDGELY
PIN 1728-03-2495
DB 8383, PG 474
HEATHROW
DURANT TRACE SECTIO
PIN 1728032551
0.246 ACRES
10,709 SQUARE FEET
TOP OF BANK
REVISED 05-25-21
TO SHOW SILT
FENCE & RIPARIAN
BUFFER
4
NORTH
NC GRID
NAD 83 (2011)
SCALE: 1"=30'
WAS PREPARED
FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE
LEGEND :
O PROPERTY CORNER
FOUND (AS NOTED)
5/8" REBAR WITH
CAP SET
Al FIRE HYDRANT
WATER METER
1111,
© COPYRIGHT 2020
BOUNDARY ZONE, INC.
THIS DRAWING AND IT'S
REPRODUCTIONS ARE
THE PROPERTY OF THE
SURVEYOR AND MAY
NOT BE REPRODUCED,
PUBLISHED OR USED IN
ANY WAY WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN PERMISSION OF
` BOUNDARY ZONE, INC.
WATER VALVE
GAS METER
GAS VALVE
POWER METER
POWER BOX
A/C UNIT
MANHOLE
SIGN
m
1445.61
1
CLEAN OUT
JUNCTION BOX
DRAINAGE INLET
CABLE BOX
TELEPHONE BOX
POWER POLE
ELEVATIONS
BOU N DARK.
LAND SURVEYING SERVICES
zo nC. & LAND PLANNING SERVICES
SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING
EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT
R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
OH OVERHANG
CTP CRIMP TOP PIPE
OTP OPEN TOP PIPE
BSL SETBACK LINE
CONC. CONCRETE
WWW.BOUNDARYZONE.COM [phone] [phone]
CORPORATE OFFICE
454 SATELLITE BLVD.
SUITE 200
SAWANEE, GA 30024
RALEIGH OFFICE
8024 GLENWOOD AVE
SUITE 109
RALEIGH, NC 27612
GRAPHIC SCALE - IN FEET
NOT VALID WITHOUT
ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
0vomill:///
CAR0
O
O lei C i l u�����`��
10/27/2020
FOR THE FIRM
BOUNDARY ZONE, INC.
FIRM NUMBER: C-3534
PROJECT
R20643-01
SHEET
lOFl
15 0
30
60