20210923 Ver 1_Wentworth St. Wetland Delineation_20210623

E
0
u
.0
February 27, 2019
Mr. David Bailey `�•�
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Replace Bridge 239 on SR 1998(Wentworth Street)over Wolf Island Creek
Rockingham County, NC
Mr. Bailey:
VHB respectfully requests concurrence with the attached request for preliminary jurisdictional determination (JD)
in association with the proposed NCDOT road improvement project. VHB is currently under contract with Simpson
Engineers&Associates, P.C. (Simpson)to provide natural resources inventories,jurisdictional assessments and
reporting.The proposed project is located in Reidsville, Rockingham County, NC.
This project is considered a linear transportation project and the preliminary JD will assist in avoidance and
minimization of unavoidable stream or wetland impacts associated with design and layout of the proposed bridge
replacement. We have attached the following information to assist with your review:
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request forms
• Figures
o 1. USGS topographic map
o 2. 1992 Soil Survey of Rockingham County, NC
o 3A-3C. Wetland delineation maps
• USACE wetland and upland data forms
• NCDWR stream forms
• Site photographs
• Landowner notification letter
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at(919) 741-5784.We look forward to hearing
from you soon.
Sincerely,
VHB
David G.Cooper
Senior Environmental Scientist
cc: Martha Register,Simpson
Mike Mills, PE, NCDOT Div. 7 Division Engineer
Jerry Parker, NCDOT Div. 7 Environmental Supervisor
Venture I
940 Main Campus Drive,Suite 500
Engineers I Scientists I Planners I Designers Raleigh,North Carolina 27606
P 919.829.0328
F 919.833.0034

Jurisdictional Determination Request
r r
US Army Corps
of Engineers•
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination(JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A,B, C,D,E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Multiple, please refer to attached mapping
City, State: Reidsville, NC
County: Rockingham
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple, NCDOT Project w/notific
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: David G. Cooper
Mailing Address: Venture 1 , 940 Main Campus Drive
Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
flI am the current property owner.
aI am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
nInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Mike Mills, PE NCDOT Div. 7 Engineer
Mailing Address: 1584 Yanceyville St. PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps)to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I,the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
NCDOT Project
Print Name
Capacity: n Owner n Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination(PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional"waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination(AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
n Size of Property or Review Area 1 7.7 acres.
The property boundary(or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
nProject Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.372309
Longitude: -79.685658
I r l A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l 1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
nCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
n Vicinity Map
Z Aerial Photograph
✓ USGS Topographic Map
✓ Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
nNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information maybe shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 2019-02-27
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: David Cooper,VHB,940 Main Campus Dr.Suite 500 Raleigh NC 27606
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Rockingham City: Reidsville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.372309 Long.: -79.685658
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Wolf Island Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
■ Field Determination. Date(s): Jan. 22 & 28 2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
Please see attached table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3)the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Delineation Flagging Maps
n Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
n Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
n Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
n USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
n U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Reidsville, NC
n Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1992 Rockingham Co. Soil Survey
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
n FEMA/FIRM maps:
n 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
n Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date): 2018 NCOneMap
or n Other (Name & Date): Site Photographs
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Estimated amount Geographic
of aquatic Type of aquatic authority to which
Latitude Longitude the aquatic
Site Feature ID (decimal (decimal resource in study resource(i.e., resource"may be"
No. area(acreage& wetland vs.non-
degrees) degrees) subject(i.e.,Section
linear feet,if wetland waters)
applicable) 404 or Section
10/404)
1 Wolf Island Creek 36.372240 -79.685727 703 If non wetland Section 404
perennial stream
2 Stream A(UT to Wolf non wetland
36.372037 -79.683781 498 If Section 404
Island Creek) perennial stream
3 Stream B (UT to Wolf non wetland
36.371781 -79.685633 198 If Section 404
Island Creek) perennial stream
4 Stream C(UT to Wolf non wetland
36.372882 -79.688327 66 If Section 404
Island Creek) perennial stream
5 Wetland A 36.371252 -79.683899 0.04 ac wetland Section 404
6 Wetland B 36.372416 -79.687166 0.64 ac wetland Section 404
7 Wetland C 36.372431 -79.687779 0.08 ac wetland Section 404
1

Legend o Sao
0, . ,, ,,,_
�o -�— North Hill
Study Area �� f
J___&---- -
CONr pi-- RD
7\--,
FAL -
,____
A \--
(---- Salem
kip-
co
n _ Iiii44 _ p so
>4 Itity,_.'ll —1.1 igi A
Village Mks\r
, \j,i , ‘........-
II goo ��y7. i L o�4
c
�QRTHs �� O �JIS• OAK St'
lm`_ . '4� 800�
� �sa G�° Art
Q
7); 7/ 7- (_7--------,C1-°\°C.C1-C y
:Irjr4P—
°° ( /' 1 —
( 4HJ __
RD � �i �—\HART 5r..
I
l �. MO_RE'Sr
SUNSET 5
T
rr
KI C+S'I
r r5Q�4 G
776---1(7:8C\RD
_'/-\ 1,000 500 0 1,000
2/ Feet
( ORT
STUDY AREA NCounty:Rockingham
�'? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT REPLACE BRIDGE 239 ON Division: 7
OF TRANSPORTATION SR 1998 (WENTWORTH STREET) _ Figure
9 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
° OVER WOLF ISLAND CREEK
v9 aP DIVISION 7 Project:17BP.7.R.140
If,.OF TRAN�'e04
2013 Reidsville USGS Quadrangle Date: Jan.2019

Legend Ana -7-1?--- -- -RnE irL+ ' RnE
,-� RnD
i C
Study Area
j
11 98A f S F - \`
7c_,,Rn�
,i,‘
-., _ , /
V aB •
r
f .
RnD _ t1B L— I RnD ` C4c'--__ ,
1
,_,..._ .,c.,,,\‘.j,y--t.'" -S,o .,:
10 � \ -L,..)
WkF IPNMkBZ ,
5 R:,
WkC �- RnD rc , - '_ 5(�
.4 . 'p, V d t5_ t, �
3 ,` 1; 1 Ck r
Mkf3� '�W k C -n fj/ry��_`
c- ) 1 c
i WkC:
P';',.i j
),,,,,,
, _ Ck Pc____D2 _-____ __ ,\:.7 r___________WkF
CeC
`r1
IWkF :� • Cc,C µF .7
4. ti
WkF `� Gv' ,
Q,4•
Gk// �� ' CdB2 fir . MKU.
(\i" ( A:.
r,a r.--
-/ WkF \
�' 0 \ PcD2 7_,;j/ir`�/ � �€ar '
Ck t t Ott ` .
t ` `` ,
W�.Ll J
1. CdB A
1 C C ( \ , PcD
rc---______,—)
� 2 .
0414:\�� 1,000 500 0 1,000
` — J
, \ 2 ( Feet
OF NORTu Cq N County:Rockingham
�� 90 SOIL SURVEY
y �'� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT REPLACE BRIDGE 239 ON Division: 7
OF TRANSPORTATION SR 1998 (WENTWORTH STREET) Figure
m DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS OVER WOLF ISLAND CREEK
v9 o v DIVISION 7 Project:17BP.7.R.140 2
F v 1992 Rockingham County Soil Survey,
OFTRAtt Map Sheets 5&10 \ Date: Jan.2019

NOTES: r '_. ���,Ilil I iyy 4,1 �� 1 x /
1. Potential aquatic resources are subject to verification by the Legend ; ; I i `
USACE and NCDWR. A; '` -�
2. Field delineations performed by VHB January 22 & 28, 2019. j'' -
3.All features are shown approximately. This is not a survey. Study Area -— Non-wetland, Perennial Stream
4. See notes and select flag labels on detail Figures 3B -3C.
Key Index Minor Contour, 2-Foot Interval \'
III
;', Rockingham239, , Wetland Major Contour, 20-Foot Interval ;-_; J 1 I I
• . r � �/ UPLAND DATA 1 1 11 11 II I I Ill III I1,
1 I
$ ilii r. I \\\ \,'Iirli;.' 1 $ 1 1 11 1,r ��pp 1! • POINT 1 Stream A , 1 I 1 1 I I i I I
" ilr,r7 ;. �+ / x`�'; 4 \ IV , 1II - 1,1 1 I I 1 11 \\
1 1\
,. . r { t "t 1 i 11 11 Y 11 1 11 1 A
y II , 1. Ili , . \ ,\
&. A /11, WETLAND STARTS I I 1 I i g I 1 I J I, A ' .
rE. \, OUTSIDE STUDY AREA / ,: I I 1 1 II I j 1 1 \ \ \
r> ��r
f , ,
\ \
. \ ,
+"��0,"13 1 r ' / L - III.I III \
,,,, .0,.
' 1' �a blot' �• .... —
1' II I III 1 II 1111 v.F
I. I tat( \( 1 / On // : III .1•4 II 11,- �41 \\\ \ V\ ,
:,, ' .'1 �}Z{.;�r\ 1'a• + ,.i •if ' rlvat�, / 1,1 ItlI1 I I I I j ,
`Y 1 4 I I I I.I I I I 1111V �� \\vVw v �'V A
/ \ 1 I 1 I�..I III I
�" ' '- I t \ UPLAND DATA - . ,/ I I I i , 'I I \. \ \\ \\\ \ \ \�
POINT 3 .... / \ w j I1\1\I 1\ip�S\ \\\ \\\
f r, \,.: �\
1.
R� \ i \e 1
Ar \ � \�� T�/ I : "A ` ;d STREAM CHANNEL c \I c GOES UNDERGROUND \I
�N
'C
h T.\ ( � d B - \
le \\ ' S 998 • -
"Y\\ 7/ __ _ __ \ ,,
Wetland A )� -'
_ ♦ *TY
'
\ Stream Cs. —���- M - it Stream B �;
—
FIG. � 9 y� \
;
\ _ ' WA
O O •
Ai' - . N.
\ I t It j
G® 3CI CB r '�
\.INSET �3 \ �' � '/y-
;moo AO / �1\ \ \ /
i • \\°. ' '. s,. -:
(N�j
FIG N 2� r.
Wetland C •� 3 ,_. 1.1
; _ ,>.y =s'., , I SET-- \
p } =x',--1-vv . ' �:., i
'-ice i�//ii,''i' --...-,,,,4„...!i // //.•. /� -- i �.f iYmita --� ', ,-..
+ #£ � UPLAND DATA r + y :�. �.�� /. �i €// �,/ / -- , ��
/ /// %//i/'i, }�� \' ;Y `'.I r �l . j/.:/.�//. / -- �- \ `\. ;::\ lilt ' 1 �,
'h. ► ...p v--.L = _— i'-�t / / /.F ii'�' /��'/i//i _ ' �C�AI� I 1 / ./ // / /� �— \ ; \: "�` \1I \i�((y` Yr\�
�' „— /�//// �/ �i� i r _ ^ , / /-! / / _ ��� \. \ \, �- 1 I ' 1. I d _ { 1. _.x- .. _
pf NORTH 04
g90G JURISDICTIONAL RESOURCES County: Rockingham
y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT REPLACE BRIDGE 239 ON
Division: 7 100 50 0 100
OF TRANSPORTATION SR 1998 (WENTWORTH STREET) Figure
o DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS OVER WOLF ISLAND CREEK WBS: 17BP.7.R.140 Fe
et 3A
91 Q4Q DIVISION 7
'''0FTpAN9Po 2018 Aerial from NCOneMap.com Date: February 2019

\ _ \ \ _\ = , . F _--- . / •
\\ / j j am'
\
•
�\ �\ � \ �\ \\�\ — J-1•/_F_x� -- �� ice. /,/ /j/ // /_. _r.. t.r 4r—IS, - / ,t f ',}•�: 4t r
•
ter-\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \\\\\' s-- --� . - i',�' /` ' �/ - � _ +
- - - \ SA-01 TIE TO ;i _ --- ---- - • -�L.-- - - // *. t4. .Rtipi - - i �__ 'M
-- --- - \ \\ 1 \ STUDY AREA '\\\\\\ -\_ - _ �' -,. { A .4111111r _ _ j
•
--- ---\\\\ \\ \\\\\\ \\ \\ 5 ,/ r • it ti' _ SA 20 TIE TO * ',sE ;.. •
IV-\\,\ \\ \\\ \\2__ _ ---- '' . ri- . `# /I F . _ = L STUDY AREA r L. ;• �� -
•
— \\ �\��\r�,\ \• \ \\\\\\ -__ _ _ SA-10 TIES r 'R Y i --- — L 1 f 5 a u F V a , ' 4
�o \\ \\\, \\\\\ TO CULVERTA , Y • L 1 1 - 'f • r -
\ r`
i _ .4:: -- -. • I a
� _
.A, . lip ' . • 4111 . . -y''' 'z'
�O �� \� \ `� STREAM A -. . .� — __/ifY / �v _ ` u �+ - /
. 7 ' - 44\ 91/4,04.4.- ' NN N
\ . . ._.„_.,,,..._,. .---,--- 1 •
. al •J. ::--'' • 'i•
ILL O F ' \ 1 — �� LT _ , • ' f' i F• l _ _
t" d' .•i \l N 2 •-"-N•.-'' 0, ---, IS I SA-11 TIE i WETLAND A4. 7
,� `i�T—�,0 #tip ' �- r. •*• r '4 �y F f �p. TO CULVERT •iV i.' . fly F -
LLL F T— y - , r c ,-
7' - - T .T•L,& •' _ L ir k I WA-06
- , �� F �- I i ALlir F.
, �.VWA-O8 -- <
WA
\ ,-.N.•
A-re—!..-- - --0. WA-12 1—/. ._
• WA 14 WA 01 -}r'
•
•
5r — '
i i ' -• _. . .— WA 18TIE I t: — --
+PI' ' s TO WA-01 J
• * - !'-.46-114*
• I r' Jam- •
w
r f railliriFk-a .71 -- -# .
.
F yOR7H C
,c(° q96, JURISDICTIONAL RESOURCES DETAIL County: Rockingham
y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT REPLACE BRIDGE 239 ON
OF TRANSPORTATION SR 1998 (WENTWORTH STREET) Division: 7 Z —.7(It40 20 0 40 Figure
I
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS OVER WOLF ISLAND CREEK WBS: 17BP.7.R.140 Feet 3B
DIVISION 7
�'h OFTAANsP° 2018 Aerial from NCOneMap.com Date: February 2019

, -_-- 7 - rx .�, .. --_^„*.....,•,,, ..1...--.- ..r ..'!•-..,..:�.;.
11;
•
' /�'/ '/ _T�1r � _� + ' _ •t `'� _yk "'' -�......,,,.q .•``.",.,, ... WB-16UQ WB-17TIE /
N 40 20 0 40 . • :.• ' "? mil 4e TO PIPE TO PIPE _ , + + +/
\\' 1 It.
4.
.:It --t"
/, /,. .
Feet WETLANDB !�` '7 x � >` e -- / t •�.. jir,.
_7\
\_, * .
, ,,, ,, _,,, •
' It ' •••' AI / , •--k. .. ..:Ilit..:•eit.':•-••; ; -_, :: . , ,
, /7, 1
i ' MO:TIM ...)
44/4 /// up mg ,.... .
o
WB 01 Alf1�7/, / , / //, t'• 'j WB oz
/ •
•
WB-41 TIE . .TO WB-01 tf /: ! o
* , ,
,A ., . / -k ,,, ,./....,
.....,,, . f. __
_ s.,..
.. , ..,. ., ir , . , ,. . ,. ., ...„, .- .,.., .. / .. .. 0
. . . , , . . „. . / ,. ,„ 94- -1-1.. - -#-
. , M=1713 , _ //le-i ,t, ,l .i 7.. i-ri 11 3.,' _•. 1,,„. ,..-'' -.',0 , >, _--- ___- .. .
/ ��/ WB30 - ��_ '
i—15 iii
..-Lig
•,0 /Wit ili j A 0-
ir
;t WETLAND CVII /�� j�' //� .0_,-
/�/ / _
t i Si # fit, -ii ��/ �• _�
WC-01 TIE TO TO - : . - :- . � o i /�•- WOLF ISLAND CREEK
I• - STUDY AREA STUDY AREA _ « -- . . - /' o� , %4 � / //
407
'' - -
z . - 40 20 40 C,� As• —, \ Air\ ,jr R / i z �Q 30 15 0 30 iumfr@
Feet PA \ - li- Feet ' 'S
SB-13 STOP \ ` 1 .1 + \\ • \ \ \\ ' a\ - - f...- \ \ \ \., \ _ •\. 4 \ —it . i.C.1 k.-
.1.___,
CHANNEL - 4.� • \\ \\ - \\ ,\ SB-01 u�m -� -i
0 / o /\� *r\ /--.
STUDY AREA - •F
r. /1 •� / yam \ , (, 'O 'I \ \\ • __ -. ra- �
STREAM CHANNEL % i - \\ - _ - ------ -------- . � - yGOES UNDERGROUND ' /. I . \\ ' •• \\ ' ,I \\ '� �S�C-Ir0T�5•MTIE TO -.---- _ t -
/ .\ f \\ \ \ 111M C pLL u AREA _ -_
‘• \ •11(r lb:
\ ._
. '''ilii\ - ...X.' 1 . . ' - n. ' ini'_--•--- -
•
'0 \ 0 \ j / // //
/ / i/ — STREAM B t i_ / \ , f \ • _ _ � ` �_,,�,
.I / /u / / / / ':.' r �'. '"�/ i{II 1. I'•• �� f •
• 4,4All• • ipt--_
elt
\ I I I I 1. l l� M#; '- _ t \ J N. `1fr. -� 1
I'' I ti/ ' I / / / / -. - '-' --ram- _'a.- — t \ - _���
• 4_ • I j l ! . ; _ •.r \ \ - _ STREAM C - \\
•
- ' • 1 i . . I I, ----61 ...2.0 I / . - -.__ •Virm:.. . -4 Ir _
• WOLF ISLAND CREEK r �•` .1. 7—=-
'� / % ; � ---____ 1 ' STUDY AREA
10 I • I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I i i -- �z M1`\{ N.
a �� �. , - r 1 q , l ! 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! . ! 1.-. / / �. \. t ram. t .�
e NORTH c
,��° 4% JURISDICTIONAL RESOURCES DETAIL County: Rockingham
y i NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT REPLACE BRIDGE 239 ON
* * OF TRANSPORTATION SR 1998 (WENTWORTH STREET) Division. 7 Figure
jOF HIGHWAYS OVER WOLF ISLAND CREEK WBS: 17BP.7.R.140 3C
Date: February 2019
DIVISION 7
'h T OF 2018 Aerial from NCOneMap.com

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Rockingham 239/Wetland A city/county: Reidsville/Rockingham Sampling Date: 01/22/2019
Applicant/Owner: NC Department of Transportation State: NC Sampling Point: WA-01
Investigator(s): David Cooper Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): <1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 36.371252 Long: -79.683899 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CsA- Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I I No ✓ (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation I ✓ Soil ✓ ,or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation 0,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No I I Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No] I within a Wetland? Yes 0 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. 1 _ No_ _
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period. Vegetation and soil are disturbed. Hydrology may be perched. Area is adjacent to what appears
to be a spill basin. Surrounding area has layer of compacted gravel/soil about 3" deep. Area flagged as wetland does not
have compacted layer, and includes a small drainage feature coming from across Moss Rd.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
n Surface Water(A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) ❑Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Thin Muck Surface(C7) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑Microtopographic Relief(D4)
ElAquatic Fauna(B13) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No❑ Depth(inches): <1
Water Table Present? Yes❑ No 0 Depth(inches): >12
Saturation Present? Yes Q No❑ Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 151 No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

Rockingham 239
VEGETATION (Five Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:WA-01
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) %Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.No trees rooted in evaluated area. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (NB)
6.
O =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
OBL species O x 1 =O
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.No saplings rooted in evaluated area. FACW species 40 x 2=80
FAC species O x 3=O
2.
FACU species 0 x 4=O
3.
UPL species 0 x 5=O
4.
Column Totals: 40 (A) 80 (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index =B/A=2.00
0 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: ❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) 0 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1.No shrubs rooted in evaluated area. 0 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
2. ❑4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0 =Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
1.Juncus effusus 40 Y FACW (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
2. Sapling-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
4 than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
5. Shrub-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
6. approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
7. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
$ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants,except woody vines,less than approximately 3
9. ft(1 m)in height.
10.
Woody vine-All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
40 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover:8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.No vines rooted in evaluated area.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Present? Yes 1151 Nol
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Rockingham 239 Sampling Point: WA-01
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) _ % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/1 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C PL CL Meets F3
6-12+ 10YR 5/1 20 7.5YR 4/6 80 C M SL
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(A1) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) El Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) El Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Rockingham 239/Wetlands B & C city/county: Reidsville/Rockingham Sampling Date: 01/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: NC Department of Transportation State: NC Sampling Point: WB-36
Investigator(s): David Cooper Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): <1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 36.372416 Long: -79.687166 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CsA- Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I I No ✓ (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation I ✓ Soil ✓ ,or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation 0,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No I I Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No] I within a Wetland? Yes 0 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. 1 _ No_ _
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period. Vegetation and soil were disturbed in the past, as evidenced by close-growing saplings around
12 years old and ditches/spoil areas. Portion of wetland complex is within a maintained power line right-of-way.
Adjacent areas not meeting soil indicator are documented in UPL 2 data form.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
n Surface Water(A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑✓ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) El Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑✓ Saturation(A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) ❑Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Q Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) 0 Microtopographic Relief(D4)
ElAquatic Fauna(B13) El FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes= No❑ Depth(inches): <1
Water Table Present? Yes❑✓ No❑ Depth(inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes Q No❑ Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 151 No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

Rockingham 239
VEGETATION (Five Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:WB-36
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1.Platanus occidentalis 50 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
2.Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.Liriodendron tulipifera 10 FACU Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 83 (NB)
6.
100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 50 20%of total cover:20
OBL species 5 x 1 =5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.Carpinus caroliniana 5 Y FAC FACW species 50 x 2= 100
2.Alnus serrulata 5 Y OBL FAC species 50 x 3= 150
FACU species 15 x 4=60
3.
UPL species 0 x 5=0
4.
Column Totals: 120 (A) 315 (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index =B/A=2.63
10 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover:2 ❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) 0 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1 Lindera benzoin 5 Y FAC 0 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
2. ❑4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5 =Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 2.5 20%of total cover: 1
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
1.No herbs aparent in evaluated area (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
2. Sapling-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
4. than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
5. Shrub-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
6. approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
7. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
$ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants,except woody vines,less than approximately 3
9. ft(1 m)in height.
10.
Woody vine-All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover:0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1,Lonicera japonica 5 Y FACU
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 2.5 20%of total cover: 1
Present? Yes 1151 NoI
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Rockingham 239 Sampling Point: WB-36
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) _ % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 5/1 90 7.5YR 5/8 10 C PL CL Meets F3 in upper 2"
2-12+ 2.5Y 5/3 80 7.5YR 4/6 15 C M CL
2.5Y 5/1 5 D M
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(A1) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) El Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
D Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) El Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM— Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Rockingham 239/Upland 1 city/county: Reidsville/Rockingham Sampling Date: 01/22/2019
Applicant/Owner: NC Department of Transportation State: NC Sampling Point: UPL1
Investigator(s): David Cooper Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): <1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 36.372764 Long: -79.684910 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: DaA- Dan River Loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I I No ✓ (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation I ✓ Soil ✓ ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 1 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 0 within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. 1 _ No_ _
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period. Data form in floodplain of Wolf Island Creek. Vegetation and soil are disturbed -area is an
agricultural field most recently planted in corn.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
n Surface Water(A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10)
❑ Saturation(A3) n Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) ❑Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑✓ Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑Microtopographic Relief(D4)
ElAquatic Fauna(B13) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes❑ No 0 Depth(inches): >12
Saturation Present? Yes Q No LJ Depth(inches): >12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 112 No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Only hydrology is drift deposits from nearby Wolf Island Creek.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

Rockingham 239
VEGETATION (Five Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UPL1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) %Cover Species? Status
1.No trees rooted in evaluated area. Numberh of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A/B)
6.
0 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 =0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.No saplings rooted in evaluated area. FACW species 2 x 2=4
FAC species 2 x 3=6
2.
FACU species 0 x 4=0
3.
UPL species 70 x 5=350
4.
Column Totals: 74 (A) 360 (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index =B/A=4.86
0 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: ❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) 0 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1.No shrubs rooted in evaluated area. 0 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
2. ❑4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0 =Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
1.Zea mays 70 Y NI (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
2.Xanthium strumarium 2 FAC Sapling-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
3.Persicaria pensylvanica 2 FACW approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
4 than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
5. Shrub-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
6. approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
7. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
$ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants,except woody vines,less than approximately 3
9. ft(1 m)in height.
10.
Woody vine-All woody vines, regardless of height.
111.
74 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 37 20%of total cover: 14.8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.No vines rooted in evaluated area.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes. No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Assuming Corn (NI)to be UPL for this data form.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Rockingham 239 Sampling Point: UPL1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 6/4 100 S
3-12+ 10YR 5/3 85 7.5YR 4/6 15 C M S
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
0 Histosol(A1) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) 0 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) El Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) D Redox Dark Surface(F6) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
0 Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
O Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) 0 Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) n Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓
Remarks:
Does not meet an indicator.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Rockingham 239/Upland 2 city/county: Reidsville/Rockingham Sampling Date: 01/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: NC Department of Transportation State: NC Sampling Point: UPL2
Investigator(s): David Cooper Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): <1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 36.372294 Long: -79.687653 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CsA- Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I I No ✓ (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation I ✓ Soil ✓ ,or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation 0,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No II Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 0 within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. 1 _ No_ _
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period. Vegetation and soil were disturbed in the past, as evidenced by close-growing saplings around
12 years old and ditches/spoil areas. Adjacent to Wetland B-C complex.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
n Surface Water(A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑✓ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10)
0 Saturation(A3) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) ❑Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Q Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) 0 Microtopographic Relief(D4)
ElAquatic Fauna(B13) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No❑ Depth(inches): <1
Water Table Present? Yes❑✓ No❑ Depth(inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes Q No❑ Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 112 No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

Rockingham 239
VEGETATION (Five Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UPL2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1.Platanus occidentalis 50 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
2.Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3.Liriodendron tulipifera 10 FACU Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 60 (NB)
6.
100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 50 20%of total cover:20
OBL species 0 x 1 =0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.Carpinus caroliniana 5 Y FAC FACW species 50 x 2= 150
FAC species 45 x 3= 135
2.
FACU species 35 x 4= 140
3.
UPL species 0 x 5=0
4.
Column Totals: 130 (A) 425 (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index =B/A=3.27
5 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 2.5 20%of total cover: 1 ❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) 0 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1.No shrubs rooted in evaluated area. 0 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
2. ❑4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0 =Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
1.Allium 20 Y FACU (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
2. Sapling-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
4. than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
5. Shrub-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
6. approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
7. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
$ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants,except woody vines,less than approximately 3
9. ft(1 m)in height.
10.
Woody vine-All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
20 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover:4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.Lonicera japonica 5 Y FACU
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 2.5 20%of total cover: 1
Present? Yes 1151 NoI
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Rockingham 239 Sampling Point: UPL2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 5/3 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C M L
2-12+ 2.5Y 5/3 50 7.5YR 5/8 40 C M L
10YR 3/1 5 2.5Y 5/2 5 10YR 3/1 = Fe-Mn masses
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(A1) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) El 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
El Histic Epipedon(A2) El Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) El Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
El 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) El Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
0 Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
El Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
El Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) El Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) El Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) El Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓
Remarks:
No chroma 2 or less soil over 40%, ruling out F12 (Iron-manganese masses)
No chroma 2 or less in upper 12", ruling out F3 (Depleted matrix)
Area is not a closed depression, ruling out F8 (Redox depressions)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Rockingham 239/Upland 3 city/county: Reidsville/Rockingham Sampling Date: 01/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: NC Department of Transportation State: NC Sampling Point: UPL3
Investigator(s): David Cooper Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): shallow valley Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 36.372676 Long: -79.685770 Datum: NAD 83
soil Map Unit Name: CsA- Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I I No ✓ (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation I ✓ Soil ✓ ,or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation 0,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 1 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 0 within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. 1 _ No_ _
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period. Area within a pasture. Water table appears perched by high clay content and very wet season.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
n Surface Water(A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants(B14) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
❑✓ High Water Table(A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10)
0 Saturation(A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) ❑Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Thin Muck Surface(C7) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑Microtopographic Relief(D4)
ElAquatic Fauna(B13) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No❑ Depth(inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes❑✓ No❑ Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes Q No❑ Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 112 No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Abnormally wet period.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

Rockingham 239
VEGETATION (Five Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UPL3
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) %Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.No trees in evaluated area. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 50 (A/B)
6.
0 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 =0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.No saplings in evaluated area. FACW species 10 x 2=20
FAC species 20 x 3=60
2.
FACU species 70 x 4=280
3.
UPL species 0 x 5=0
4.
Column Totals: 100 (A) 360 (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index =B/A=3.60
0 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: ❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) ❑ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1.No shrubs rooted in evaluated area. 0 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0'
2. ❑4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0 =Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 m ) approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
1.Lolium perenne 70 Y FACU (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
2.Rumex crispus 20 Y FAC Sapling-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
3.Juncus effusus 10 FACW approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
4. than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
5. Shrub-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
6. approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
7. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,including
$ herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants,except woody vines,less than approximately 3
9. ft(1 m)in height.
10.
Woody vine-All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
100 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 50 20%of total cover:20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 m )
1.No vines in evaluated area.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes. No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Rockingham 239 Sampling Point: UPL3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 4/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M CL Less than 2"thick chroma 2
1-12+ 10YR 4/3 30 7.5YR 5/6 60 CL
10YR 4/2 10
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol(A1) ❑ Dark Surface(S7) El 2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) El Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) El Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
❑ Stratified Layers(A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
El 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) El Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks)
0 Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8)
El Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147,148) MLRA 136)
El Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) El Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 136,122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) El Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) El Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓
Remarks:
Very wet period with much recent rain. Wetland data point taken in the wettest- looking area (ponded water).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 94ria.rv. A
Rt'ell:N)L•am'b adge Latitu
de:
Date: r�D1q,B1, 2 •L Project/Site: 231 36 .37,2037
Evaluator: -0
Ev •aluator- Cooper County: ROCkt,.lham Longitude: d'19, 6, 837S/
Total Points: Stream Determination (c' - • • - Other Reidsville
Stream is at least intermittent 33. s Ephemeral Intermittent =1:11 e.g. Quad Name:
if 19 or perennial if 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 23 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 0 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 d
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 0
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 0 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 n
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 0 3
8. Headcuts CD 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 Ca0 1 1 .5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1 .5
11 . Second or greater order channel No = 0 (.(es = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = lb )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 le
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 01 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1 ,9) 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 Q 1 .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1 .5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 es =
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5• 5" )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 d 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed g2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
21 . Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1 .5
23. Crayfish V 0.5 1 1 .5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1 .5
25. Algae 0 (0.6) 1 1 .5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1 .5 tither Co)
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Could nut /,0�ea, le Aare ordeal affun Ce aeu,rta. ftc4 4racks AI Mkt seway
nathdJ or C/gams 7)
v.(bk4' It ToBw 20 ' 1laoli1,4s G =2dp " Row AO, Clean
Sketch: dbkF 2.5' To 144-• 41.5' Sa6S+rw¢e ; loost sand toi, 9r4v41 to(, Co6b(aS1 bektar%
LS1 of sandy saci.'rrt214 Ora✓b - broken yetsf, M-ef, pinsktr e4e • • •
BanKS Veal? a (, kjgkly Breed . 'Brictiol s4recten are now poorly a.Qdjteaof qp
s$ i W n a brtdp .
l•

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 54(eA,rw r
Date: 2019 .0t ' 21 Projectlsite: t1otK in 1"4".
dye 239 Latitude: 3 !0• 3"ll181
Evaluator: "David Cooper County: RoCIC/elt Longitude: -` J 485Ip33
Total Points: Stream Determination (ctr e) Other ReidSllille
Stream is at least intermittent 31 Ephemeral Intermittent erenniali e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if z 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ( q .5. ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 © 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 0 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 6 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 Q
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 (t 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches r0 lYJ 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits l0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1) 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 0 1 .5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1 .5
11 . Second or greater order channel No Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1 .5" )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 l`J 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1 .5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 1 1 .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 •.5 1 1 .5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 (2) 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed © 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 ® 3
21 . Aquatic Mollusks f%) 1 2 3
22. Fish 0.5 1 1 .5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 6 1 .5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 .5
25. Algae ® 0.5 1 1 .5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1 .5 Cther =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes: Several a.m 4.rpoo'$ M /d9O Lana.27 'f R fit bee1fe /erual .
Several juve.eare Ca.,..baeu ( sp. era.TPS get rya
va(k _ AtSrnojnwJha1
meander
•
Sketch: swim snci'/kt46/540ei underyokmd we N be-4re cennue„ce w/W,lf rs . Ck.
wbk4 2 • S' To&t,a 5 ' 4-40dep441 l " Swbs#re..+e : Said ro 7.
etbk4 hi"' TOB11+ , S' Flom modenetei Clear leave ( tot/
cobble 204/
bedrock lot/

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Sl rtam C
Date: 20 11 I . Z$ Project/Site: % lle q Latitude: 3(o. 3728V
Evaluator: -pautd CoO�t r County: Rt 4165 Longitude: _71 4 %%321
Total Points: r_ Stream Determination (cir a Other Rei4SVI III,
Stream is at least intermittent 3l. Ephemeral Intermittent erennia e.g. Quad Name:
f a 19 or perennial if a 30* 1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I ' ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 �2 0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 0) 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 d 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 a) 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 ^1 3�J
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
8. Headcuts ID 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 (0„) 1 1 .5
10. Natural valley 0 n�0.5 1 ORS
11 . Second or greater order channel 'o = % Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual p
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = \ )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria i 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter OD 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0CS 1 1 .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 C1) 1 .5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 is
C. Biology (Subtotal = II )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 © 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed CS) 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 © 3
21 . Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 th 1 .5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 0 1 .5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 .5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1 .5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1 .5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: /Nei oa+pAt,r;oeds 4 mid? larvae . F'SL are invnnotos, non - CarAttitia •
(Ptr �gor tladrapr� 40 er Seme,It%hS•
nol' Ca4..jk1 •Cor rp.
Sketch: Wyk' 3 ,5 ' T0Bto (o ' WZ0pego4t 5 " st4s4rade : Sorel (oo 't
dbkC 1.5 ' 'TOB NI•. "/ flow ntodera4, a(ear 3rave.l Zo%,
56+ 20 /.

Replace Bridge 239 on SR 1998 (Wentworth Street) over Wolf Island Creek
Rockingham County,NC
Site Photographs—Taken January 22 & 28,2019
r�
s, I y; �{ t t
.. ✓ • lF -` -� _ i P.f E p;;t �
�
J
. . :,4:--T-zt'li •
iii
oNtiliiiii_
.c.f,,.,.,...
, . _:,,, .. -
Wolf Island Creek Stream A
t - 4;-�`
r
seis
.G ..� g
s ,yam ti . L jA: r :.
.,y Wa t Y �} 1" tt ' Ica V ` . ,- r
�1J.` ': -:�'� < `CIE t.. •— R
7.
N 3
'. 1 /. , tti;' ^ Y'�1.�'it.nk R._. ��NNllii�e -
•
Stream B,looking downstream from SB-01 TT Study Area Area below Stream B SB-13 Stop Channel—No surface
connection to Wolf Island Creek
l
iN.
...
�.�vS, n.it F`k SA l.r ,,`. •i , f,v „g ••:7,, } T�q c . d -a ' C7,-.y. v _ • • \.i Y.�
•
..
_ ' ' -
:.. ._^A., •
•
8Y
t.,
7.r
Stream C Wetland A
Rockingham Bridge 239 VHB Project No. 39019.16
Site Photographs Page 1 of 2

. q. ',' , ,,,,,,.,,.., ,.:,,,, ......,, 4 ,,
;, ,,, Iiikill „. :,. ..,_ - .
.. . ,
iow , :-...'.. ,,.-.11_,.-1,-_-
,,,./, , ,.
a%
. ., ,
,..-.„.,. ;2 - ,. ..-i,,„,0 f ,_ ,:, . ,
i n..,...d ...,,.4:-.,.-_ ---..;:,,...,-
v 14 in. Y ''� ,-.
•
., Y - I dl' �,
1 .;C✓ .. ,t A , ;
-re
Wetland B at Flag WB-10 Wetland B at Flag WB-15
°a /
. ' 1 it . , •Vil: l'i' ' A\I]k !, ,,.'''''' ''.11., 4.' C. 1 ,. 7,1„5,1 ' -,..,14
.444, ..„,oil
.: , i ...,,,.i.4 . , , .„ -4.,:, . , ,
s _ ' �'Y �jf tea,,
.,`I.
'.,., ' ' . . ., ''. - ' .,' ''' 'ref. `,‘N„...'\4 ' . 4. ' '. '' '''' . - -,....:: S's..e-4
,' i..i .ram
y, 4i,1 It
1 �e eR
Wetland C Upland Data Point 2 Vicinity
;„ '- f
✓ ; r
fi
A eln v Ij 3 1
[� r
Upland Data Point 3 Vicinity
VHB Project No. 39019.16
Rockingham Bridge 239
Site Photographs Page 2 of 2

,c0Ft,°Rill c4Ro4 WBS No. 17BP.7.R.142 Dec.2018
hP 9 Attn: Diane Wilson
* * NCDOT Project Development
1598 Mail Service Center
�,4,4r OF TR AM ¢`�S� Raleigh,NC 27699-1598
Connecting people,products and places safely and efficiently with customer focus,accountability
and environmental sensitivity to enhance the economy and vitality of North Carolina
4.41/4
F„�RWBS No. 17BP.7.R.140
4p
* Replace Wentworth Street Bridge (No. 239) over Wolf Island Creek,
Rockingham County
f4„ OF TRANS,o4t4
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has begun planning and environmental
Questions? studies for the proposed replacement of the Wentworth Street Bridge on existing location over Wolf
NCDOT Consultant Island Creek in Rockingham County.
Project Manager As part of the preparation required for building this project, engineers, surveyors, geologists, and
Martha Register others representing NCDOT will be working on or near your property for the next several months
919-852-0468 collecting data necessary for the design of this transportation project. Other State and Federal
mregister@simpsonengr. Agency representatives relevant to the project may also be present with NCDOT to ensure that the
corn data collected conforms to matters within their respective jurisdictions. The specific area in which
these representatives will be working does not necessarily indicate the final location or extent of the
Aquellas personas proposed transportation improvement.
que hablan espariol y These representatives will be wearing high visibility safety vests, and will be locating and measuring
no hablan ingles, o utilities, property corners, transportation features, and the limits of streams and wetlands. These
tienen limitaciones representatives will use wooden stakes, various colors of flagging, or ribbons, hung on trees and
para leer, hablar o shrubs as part of their work. These stakes and flagging do not indicate the location of the proposed
entender ingles, transportation project, but theyare veryimportant in our planningand environmental project
podrian recibir p p l p
servicios de
development process. Please do not disturb these stakes and flagging.
interpretacion si los As the study progresses, newsletters will be mailed and/or advertised public meetings may be held
solicitan Ilamando al to present information and any preliminary designs to keep you informed of the project's progress.
1-800-481-6494