20201940 Ver 2_Mitigation Bank Instrument_20210622

ID#* 20201940 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 06/22/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/22/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Company/Owner:* Wildlands Engineering
Contact Name:*
Andrea Eckardt
Project Information
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Rosewood Mitigation Site
County: Wayne
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Bank Instrument
File Upload: Rosewood Draft MBI 6.22.21.pdf 307.99KB
Rease upload only one RDF of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Andrea Eckardt
Signature:*

AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ROSEWOOD MITIGATION BANKING INSTRUMENT IN THE NEUSE
RIVER BASIN FOR NUTRIENT OFFSET AND RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION CREDITS PURSUANT TO THE
NEUSE RIVER BASIN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PREAMBLE.......................................................
II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA......
III. AUTHORITIES...................................................
IV. ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL ....................
V. BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE ............
VI. POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION ..........
VII. CALCULATION OF MITIGATION CREDITS .............
Vill. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE ...............................
IX. PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING ......
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE ....................................
XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS ......................................
.................................................................... 2
.................................................................... 2
.................................................................... 3
.................................................................... 3
.................................................................... 4
.................................................................... 6
.................................................................... 8
.................................................................. 10
.................................................................. 11
.................................................................. 12
.................................................................. 13
ATTACHMENTS
A - Division of Water Resources Authority Document
B —Ledger Templates
1. Nutrient Offset Payment Rule:
httD://reDorts.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20auaIity/chapter%2002%20
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0703.pdf
2. Riparian Buffer Mitigation Rule:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guaIitV/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
3. NC Session Law 2019- 86 " Nutrient Offset Credits":
https://ncleg.gov/Enacted Legislation/SessionLaws/HTML/2019-2020/SL2019-86.html
4. Buffer Interpretation/ Clarification # 2008- 019 for diffuse flow:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20QualitV/Surface%20Water%20Protection/401/Buffer%20CIarification%2
OMemos/Diffuse- Flow-for- Buff er-Mitigation-Sites- Buff er-Clarification-Memo-20080819.pdf
5. Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits (November
2019):
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Surface%20Water%20Protection/401/Mitigation/Issues---
Resolutions-Ver-1.0-buffer-mitigation-nutrient-offset.pdf
6. NCDWR — Methodology and Calculations for Nutrient Reductions on the Bank Parcel:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20QuaIitV/Planning/NPU/Nutrient%20Offset%20Rule/Ag-Buffer-Credit.pdf
1

I. PREAMBLE
This Mitigation Banking Instrument ("Instrument") regarding the establishment, use, operation, and
maintenance of the Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Bank Parcel") to provide Neuse Riparian
Buffer mitigation credits ("Riparian Buffer Credits") and Neuse Nutrient Strategy nutrient load
reduction credit ("Nutrient Offset Credits") is made and entered into by and among Wildlands
Holdings III, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor ("Sponsor") and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality— Division of Water Resources ("DWR"). This Instrument is in accordance with
15A NCAC 02B .0703 and the Consolidated Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, which became
effective on April 1, 2020 and November 1, 2015 respectively (Reference Numbers 1 and 2).
The purpose of the Bank is:
A. To restore, enhance, and preserve riparian vegetation adjacent to streams and/or agricultural
ditches with the intent to improve water quality, reduce nutrient loads, enhance flood
attenuation and restore wildlife habitat along unnamed tributaries and ditches within the
Neuse River Basin.
B. To convert agricultural land uses within riparian areas adjacent to streams and/or agricultural
ditches into a dense and diverse, hardwood vegetated state with the intent to significantly
reduce nutrient loadings associated with agricultural practices into streams and ditches.
C. To provide mitigation and sell any resulting Riparian Buffer Credits and/or Nutrient Offset Credits
to third parties in specific areas within the Neuse River Basin for development (both existing and
proposed) or to offset NPDES-permitted wastewater nutrient sources requiring such mitigation
or offset.
II. LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA
A. The Geographic Service Area ("GSA") is the designated area wherein a Bank can reasonably be
expected to sell Riparian Buffer Credits and/or Nutrient Offset Credits for impacts due to
development activities.
B. The GSA for this Bank Parcel is limited to the United States Geological Survey ("USGS") 8-digit
Hydrologic Unit Code ("HUC) 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin, excluding the Falls Lake
Watershed.
C. Sale or transfer of Riparian Buffer Credits shall be limited to the 8-digit HUC 03020201 in the
Neuse River Basin, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, unless otherwise authorized by the DWR
or delegated local government in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
D. Sale or transfer of Nutrient Offset Credits shall be limited to the 8-digit HUC 03020201 in the
Neuse River Basin, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703,
unless otherwise authorized by the DWR in accordance with Session Law (S.L.) 2019-86
2

E. The Rosewood Parcel is comprised of land in Wayne County, NC and is currently used for row
crops. The project is located at 35.406567' N and 78.075854' W.
III. AUTHORITIES
A. The Bank will be used to provide Riparian Buffer Credit and/or Nutrient Offset Credit in
accordance with the requirements in the DWR Authority document referenced herein as
"Attachment A" and attached to this Instrument.
B. Projects eligible for utilization of the credits are those requiring authorization under the
requirements of Attachment A and any new approved North Carolina ("State") statutes and rules
for the Neuse Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy.
C. The selling of credits generated from the Bank Parcel approved under this Instrument shall be
consistent with approved State statutes and rules for the Neuse Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Management Strategy.
D. Mitigation activities proposed under this Instrument and corresponding Bank Parcel Development
Package (BPDP) to generate Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits shall be consistent
with State statutes and rules for the Neuse Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy that
are in place at the time a complete BPDP is submitted to DWR.
IV. ESTABLISHMENT OF BANK PARCEL
A. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC 02B .0703, DWR has provided a "Site
Viability Letter" for the Bank Parcel proposed under this Instrument. The Site Viability Letter is
not an approval of the site to generate Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits, but is
a preliminary review of the Bank Parcel that details and confirms existing land use conditions,
defines the riparian sites (Enhancement, Preservation, or Restoration), and identifies features
(streams, ditches, ponds, etc.) that meet general criteria to be suitable to generate Riparian Buffer
Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits. Table 1.0 below outlines when a Site Viability Letter was
issued by DWR for the mitigation site proposed under this Instrument:
Table 1.0—Site Viability Letter Details
Bank Parcel
NC DWR Site
Viability Letter
Viability Letter
Evaluation
Received
Expiration Date
Rosewood
March 25, 2021
April 19, 2021
April 19, 2023
B. A valid Site Viability Letter is required prior to submittal of each BPDP. Site Viability Letters will
either expire on the dates listed in the table above or upon submittal of an individual As -Built
Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. If a Site Viability Letter expires prior to submittal of a
complete BPDP as described in Section V to DWR, then the Sponsor must submit a formal request
to DWR for a new Site Viability Letter for that Bank Parcel.
3

C. The Bank Parcel proposed for inclusion under this Instrument shall require a BPDP be submitted
to, and approved, by the DWR prior to use of the individual Bank Parcel for mitigation purposes
or the sale or transfer of any associated credits. The contents of the BPDP are provided in Section
V.
D. The BPDP submitted under this instrument will be placed on public notice and made available for
public commenting for 15 calendar days.
E. Riparian Buffer Credit maybeachieved through restoration of DWR riparian buffersasthey are
defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0233, and other riparian areas as allowed per 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(n). Riparian buffer credits are only attainable if the width of the restoration site is within at
least 20 feet from tops of banks along streams and . Riparian buffer credits are attainable to
a maximum of 200feet from tops of banks of streams.
F. The Bank Parcel is intended to provided Neuse Riparian Buffer Mitigation as follows:
1. Planting hardwood trees on a Restoration Site as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b)
adjacent to one intermittent stream.
2. Maintaining a Preservation Site, as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295(b) by placing a
conservation easement around riparian areas along streams as allowed per 15 NCAC 02B
.0295(o).
G. Nutrient Offset Credit may be achieved on the Bank Parcel through restoration of the riparian
areas adjacent to the intermittent stream and ditches where agriculture was determined by DWR
to be the predominant land use. On this Bank Parcel, the width of the restoration area will begin
at the top of bank or the rooted herbaceous vegetation and extends landward a minimum of 50
feet and a maximum of 200 feet on all sides of the surface waters. A conservation easement will
be secured to include the tops of all channel and ditch banks and will extend out a maximum of
200 feet from the surface waters.
H. The Bank Parcel is expected to provide Nutrient Offset Credits as follows:
1. Converting agricultural land uses within riparian areas to non-agricultural land uses by
placing a perpetual conservation easement around riparian areas along streams and
ditches.
2. Planting hardwood trees on a Restoration Site as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b)
adjacent to streams and ditches where agriculture has been determined by DWR to be
the predominant land use.
3. Placing a conservation easement around restored riparian areas along streams and a ditch
in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703 (g).
I. The total area of riparian restoration activities on the Bank Parcel is expected to be 47.2 acres.
V. BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
M

A. The Rosewood BPDP submitted under this Instrument shall be submitted to DWR for review and
must be approved by DWR prior to any construction on the Bank Parcel. The BPDP must describe
any changes that have occurred to the site between the date of the Site Viability Letter and the
date the BPDP is submitted to DWR. The BPDP shall include detailed information consistent with
the sections below concerning; 1) site location (8-digit HUC is required); 2) existing conditions
with current photos; 3) proposed buffer mitigation and nutrient offset activities including a
detailed vegetation plan; 4) monitoring and maintenance plans; 5) financial assurances; 6)
associated buffer /nutrient credit calculations, which shall include credit generation, service area,
and accounting as appropriate for each regulatory authority; 7) stream buffer determination
letter from DWR; 8) Site Viability Letter from DWR; and 9) service area figure for each mitigation
type proposed under this Instrument.
B. The Sponsor will obtain all applicable federal, state and local documentation, permits, or
authorizations needed to construct and maintain the Bank Parcel. This Instrument does not
qualify as, or substitute for, such documentation, permit, or authorization.
C. Any restoration activities or proposed construction within the streams, riparian buffers and other
riparian areas on the Bank Parcel to produce Riparian Buffer Credit and/or Nutrient Offset Credit
must be approved by DWR in writing prior to implementation. The failure of the Sponsor to
comply with this requirement may result in a revised or reduced credit release schedule.
D. Requests for deviation from the approved BPDP must be submitted to DWR in writing. Written
approval from the DWR must be received prior to implementing any deviation from the approved
BPDP.
Property Disposition & Long -Term Management
E. Prior to the release of any credits, the Sponsor shall record permanent conservation easements
at the Wayne County Register of Deed's office that is sufficient to ensure protection, operation,
and maintenance of restored riparian buffers and other riparian areas for the duration specified
in the approved BPDP.
F. The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by the
State of North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas and shall
be approved by the DWR prior to the release of any credits.
G. The Sponsor shall not grant additional easements, right of ways, or any other property interest in
or to the project areas, without prior approval from the DWR.
H. The Sponsor agrees to assign the conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a
qualified holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121-34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal
Revenue Code prior to the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. The holder shall be a land
trust or stewardship program that will hold and enforce the conservation easement and the
interests in perpetuity. The Sponsor shall choose a land trust or stewardship program that is
accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission and/or has been approved by DWR prior
to the end of the fourth year monitoring period. A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code.
61

I. In the event the Sponsor is also the owner of the underlying fee interest in the property the
conveyance of the conservation easement to a land trust or stewardship fund must be arranged
at the outset of the approved BPDP
Financial Assurances
J. Following approval of the BPDP, the Sponsor shall provide Performance/Maintenance Bonds from
a surety company that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best, to construct the sites
according to the approved BPDP. It is the Sponsor's responsibility to confirm that the surety
company is rated no less than an "A-" with each annual bond renewal.
K. The amount of the Performance Bond shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of
the riparian restoration and other related activities of the Bank Parcel as described in the
approved BPDP. No bond shall be less than $150,000.00 to cover construction costs.
L. Alternatively, in lieu of posting a Performance Bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the
project prior to the first credit release.
M. Once DWR has released all credits for completion of all the items listed below, then the Bank
Sponsor will be released from its performance obligations under the performance bond required
in Item J and K of this section:
1. Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement Recorded, Financial
Assurance Posted;
2. Mitigation Site Earthwork and Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed;
3. As -Built Report as described in Section VI has been received by DWR; and
4. DWR has submitted a written approval of the As -Built Report
N. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.
VI. POST CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION
As -Built Report
A. The Sponsor agrees to perform all necessary work, in accordance with the provisions of this
Instrument and corresponding BPDP, to establish, maintain, and monitor Neuse Riparian Buffers
or other riparian areas until Items B (1) and (2) of Section X have been satisfied.
B. The Sponsor will submit an as -built plan and report to the DWR for the Bank Parcel within 30
calendar days after completing the establishment of the buffer mitigation and nutrient offset
areas. Each As -Built report will describe any deviation from the approved BPDP and will document
all the following:
0

1. Buffer restoration planting details and other construction activities that were required in
the BPDP, confirmation that all boundary markers are installed, invasive species control,
monitoring device locations, vegetation plot locations, and photo point locations.
2. Boundary Survey of the conservation easement area, signed and sealed by a licensed
surveyor, including an inventory of the final mitigation areas for Riparian Buffer Credits
and Nutrient Offset Credits in both square feet and acres.
3. As -built map of the mitigation area showing where riparian restoration was performed
and any deviations to the Bank Parcel from what was approved in the BPDP.
4. Aerial map of the mitigation area that was included in the approved BPDP.
Financial Assurance
C. After completion of the riparian restoration and mitigation activities on the Bank Parcel, a
separate Performance/ Maintenance Bond will be secured for 100% of the estimated cost to
implement the monitoring and maintenance plan as described in the approved BPDP and As -Built
Report. The Bond must be from a surety company that is rated no less than an "A-' as rated by
A.M. Best, and it is the Sponsor's responsibility to confirm the surety company is still rated no less
than an "A-" with each annual bond renewals.
D. A Performance/Maintenance Bond shall be secured each year for a minimum of five years, and
until DWR has released all Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits to the Bank Sponsor.
Upon DWR approval, the bond may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete
the monitoring. No bond shall be less than $100,000 to cover monitoring and maintenance costs
initially.
E. Once DWR has released 100% of all credits for completion of all Bank Parcel milestones described
in Table 2 of Section Vill, the Bank Sponsorwill be released from its performance obligations under
the performance bond required in C and D in this section.
F. To comply with this section, DWR must be the Obligee on all performance bonds.
Monitoring and Maintenance Reports
G. The Sponsor shall monitor the Bank Parcel as described in the BPDP until such time as DWR
determines that the performance standards described below have been met. The monitoring
period shall be a minimum of five consecutive years.
H. Performance Standards for Vegetation: Native hardwood trees or native hardwood tree and shrub
species should be planted at a density sufficient to provide 260 stems per acre after five years. A
minimum of four (4) native hardwood trees or four (4) native hardwood tree and shrub species
must be planted. No one species shall be greater than 50% of the planted stems. A list of species
for planting will be detailed in the BPDP for approval. Native hardwood tree volunteer species
may be included to meet performance standards as determined by the DWR.
7

I. A "stem" means a woody seedling, sapling, shrub or tree, no less than 10 centimeters in height.
J. If the performance standards of the vegetation are not met, supplemental plantings may be
required. Supplemental plantings will be utilized until the required densities have been achieved
and maintained for five years. Bank Parcel maintenance, such as ensuring diffused flow, managing
invasive species, and pest control will be included in the BPDP.
K. Monitoring Reports for Riparian Buffer Creditor Nutrient Offset Credit: Reporting criteria of the
vegetation shall be based on the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) - EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Level 2 Plot Sampling only version 4.0 or any updated versions of this protocol in place
at the date of acceptance of the BPDP. The Sponsor shall submit to the DWR an annual monitoring
report no later than December 31 of each year for a minimum of five consecutive years after the
first full growing season. This report will describe the conditions of the Bank Parcel, including an
evaluation of the performance standards of the vegetation contained within the approved BPDP.
Reports shall contain the following:
1. A U.S. Geological Survey map showing location of the Bank Parcel;
2. A detailed narrative with supporting photos summarizing the condition of the Bank Parcel
along with any maintenance or remediation performed that year; and
3. A map, survey, or other figures showing locations of sampling plots, permanent photo
points, and location of transects, Etc.; and
4. Monitoring data, including specific vegetation counts and heights showing that the trees
or tree and shrub species planted are meeting performance standards and updated
photographs; and
5. A copy of the most recent Bank credit/debit lodgers; and
6. Corresponding verification letters from designated local governments upon request; and
7. Corresponding Mitigation Transfer Certificates upon request; and
8. Proof of performance bond renewal to cover the next monitoring year (when applicable).
Contingency Plans/Remedial Actions
L. In the event a Bank Parcel fails to achieve the performance criteria described in this Instrument
and in the approved BPDP, the Bank Sponsor shall develop necessary contingency plans in
coordination with the DWR and implement appropriate remedial actions for the Bank Parcels and
the Bank. Depending on the degree of remedial actions required, the DWR may modify the
monitoring period.
VII. CALCULATION OF MITIGATION CREDITS
Riparian Buffer Credits
A. All Riparian Buffer Credits shall be determined based on the ratios and percentages provided in
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and (n) following the guidance provided in the Clarified Procedures for
Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits letter issued by the DWR, see
reference #5, including the most recent Project Credit Table Template provided online.

B. Riparian buffer restoration on the Bank Parcel, as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295(n) and defined
in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b) that is performed on agriculture lands within the Bank Parcel, may be
used for either Riparian Buffer Credit or Nutrient Offset Credit, but not both.
C. Riparian Buffer Credit is defined as one (1) buffer credit per one square foot or 43,560 buffer
credits per one acre.
Nutrient Offset Credits
D. The square footage of Nutrient Offset Credits on the Bank Parcel will be determined by applying
the applicable ratio as provided in 15A NCAC 02B .0295(m) for a Restoration Site following the
guidance provided in the Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and
Nutrient Offset Credits issued by the DWR including the most recent Project Credit Table
Template, see reference #5, including the most recent Project Credit Table Template provided
online. All riparian areas proposed for Nutrient Offset Credits must be a minimum of 50 feet from
the top of the stream or ditch banks on land noted in a Site Viability Letter as agriculture
E. Nutrient Abatement of Restored Riparian Area/Buffers on agricultural land: The Sponsor and DWR
agree:
1. The pounds of nitrogen offset per acre of restored riparian areas/buffers on agricultural
land shall be 2,273.02 pounds per acre or 19.16394 square feet per pound.
F. The Sponsor and DWR agree that the methodology and calculations for determining nitrogen
reductions, associated with restoration of riparian areas on this Bank Parcel as described in
Section IV of this Instrument, shall be fixed as part of the approval of this Instrument, with the
fixed amount not changing during the Bank Parcel Development or credit release schedule for the
Bank Parcel. For further details on the approved method and calculations for determining
nutrient reductions associated with the riparian restoration on this Bank Parcel refer to the
NCDWR - Methodology & Calculations for Nutrient Reductions document found in reference
number 6.
This space left blank intentionally, do not add text to this space.
9

Vill. CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
A. Upon submittal of all appropriate documentation by the Sponsor, and subsequent approval by
DWR, it is agreed that the Riparian Buffer Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits associated with the
Bank Parcel will become available for sale to a third party in accordance with the Credit Release
Schedule in Table 2.0 below:
Table 2.0 - Credit Release Schedule for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
Credit
Available for
Task
Project Milestone
Sale
Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement
1
Recorded*, and Financial Assurance Posted
20
Mitigation Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring
2
Devices Completed
20
Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As -Built
3
Report
10
Monitoring Report #1: Approved by the DWR** & financial
4
assurance renewed
10
Monitoring Report #2: Approved by the DWR** & financial
5
assurance renewed
10
Monitoring Report #3: Approved by the DWR** & financial
6
assurance renewed
10
Item B (1) of Section X in this Instrument has been completed and
7
approved by DWR
5
No remaining credits will be released until Task 7 has been satisfied, assigning the
conversation easement to an approved land trust or long-term steward.
Monitoring Report #4: Approved by the DWR** & financial
8
assurance renewed
5
Monitoring Report #5: Approved by the DWR** and final site visit
9
by DWR has been conducted
10
Total
100%
* For specification, please see Section V in this Instrument
** DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting performance
standards contained within the approved BPDP
B. DWR may modify Credit Release Schedules based on the information submitted or the order in
which required information is received. DWR will notify the Sponsor of any modification to the
credit release schedule.
C. DWR may consider a Credit Release Schedule for a Bank Parcel based on the extent of change
between current onsite conditions and proposed post construction conditions.
10

IX. PROCEDURE FOR DEBITING AND CREDITING
Credit Ledgers
A. The Bank Sponsor shall maintain one credit ledger for each mitigation type for the Bank Parcel
under this Instrument: Credit ledgers shall provide the accounting for Riparian Buffer Credits in
square feet and acres and Nutrient Offset Credits in pounds and square feet.
B. Each credit ledger shall be submitted on a separate 8 % in. x 11in. spreadsheet with legible font
style and font size. All ledgers shall be submitted using the templates provided in Attachment B
of this Instrument or any updated versions to these templates as provided by DWR.
Credit Processing
C. Riparian Buffer Credits generated on this Bank Parcel will be used to provide mitigation for
authorized buffer impacts within the 03020201 HUC of the Neuse River Basin according to 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (f) and (g), excluding the Falls Lake Watershed.
D. Nutrient Offset Credits generated on this Bank Parcel will be used to offset nitrogen nutrient loads
within the 03020201 HUC of the Neuse River Basin, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
E. Available Riparian Buffer Credits (credits that have been released by DWR but not sold by the
Sponsor) that are generated from riparian restoration on agricultural land and meet criteria for
nutrient offset credits as outlined in Section VII of this Instrument, the Site Viability Letter and the
corresponding BPDP can be converted from Riparian Buffer Credits into Nutrient Offset Credits
upon written approval from DWR. Once a credit has been converted to another credit type, the
transaction is permanent and the credit cannot be converted again.
F. Available Nutrient Offset Credits (credits that have been released by DWR but not sold by the
Sponsor) that are generated from riparian restoration within 0-100' from tops of banks and meet
criteria for riparian buffer credits as outlined in Section VII of this Instrument, the Site Viability
Letter, 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and the corresponding BPDP can be converted from Nutrient Offset
Credits to Riparian Buffer Credits upon written approval from DWR. Once a credit has been
converted to another credit type, the transaction is permanent and the credit cannot be
converted again.
G. Credit conversions must be calculated using the guidance provided in the Clarified Procedures for
Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits letter issued by the DWR, see
reference #5.
H. The Bank Sponsor shall obtain written verification of nutrient offset need from a designated local
government in the 03020201 HUC of the Neuse River Basin outside of the Falls Lake Watershed,
or from DWR through an approved NPDES permit for wastewater nutrient sources prior to
debiting Nutrient Offset Credits from the Bank Parcel.
11

I. The Bank Sponsor shall obtain verification of buffer mitigation required from the delegated local
government in the 03020201 HUC of the Neuse River Basin outside of the Falls Lake Watershed
or DWR prior to debiting Riparian Buffer Credits from the Bank Parcel.
J. All credit and debit transactions for each Bank Parcel under this Instrument shall be accurately
depicted in the credit ledgers. The Sponsor shall submit accurate and up-to-date credit ledgers
for each Bank Parcel by the 10th of each month. At a minimum and only upon request, DWR shall
receive a hard copy of updated credit ledgers along with corresponding Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificates and all corresponding letters from the designated local governments or DWR where
applicable once a year. Notification of all credit sales shall be provided to DWR until all credits
that have been released have been sold.
Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificates
K. All credit sales will include a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate ("Certificate") that is required
to be provided to the buyer of Riparian Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset Credits, that will include, at
a minimum, the following information;
1. Bank Details: (1) Sponsor Name, (2) Bank Parcel name as it appears in this Instrument and,
(3) DWR project number for the BPDP as it appears in Table 1.0.
2. Credit Details: (1) date of receipt, (2) identify if full or partial payment, and (3- when
applicable) amount of nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credits purchased in pounds and
confirmation from the designated local government or DWR of the amount required, and
(4-when applicable) the amount of Riparian Buffer Credits purchased in square feet and
the confirmation from DWR or the local government of the amount required.
3. Permitted Project Details: (1) project name and project number as it appears on DWR or
local government permits and/or certifications, (2) 8-digit HUC, (3) river basin, (4) nutrient
strategy applicable to the project with impacts, (5 — when applicable) designated local
government requiring Nutrient Offset Credits, and/or (6) DWR or delegated local
government requiring Riparian Butter Credits for this project.
L. If the DWR determines the Bank is operating at a deficit (e.g. the Sponsor is selling and/or
transferring credit that is not available), or the Bank is selling or transferring credits out of
compliance with statutes, rules or this Agreement, the sale/transfer of credits will immediately
cease, and the DWR, in consultation with the Sponsor, will determine what remedial actions are
necessary.
X. BANK PARCEL CLOSURE
A. Bank Parcel Closure shall be identified as the event when the Sponsor is relieved of all its
responsibilities to the Bank Parcel and there are no Riparian Buffer Credits or Nutrient Offset
Credits left to sell.
B. Bank Parcel Closure shall commence only after all the following events have occurred;
12

1. Transfer or assign the conservation easement and all its interests, in perpetuity, to a land
trust or stewardship program as described in Section V of this instrument.
2. All five years of monitoring completed and all monitoring reports submitted and approved
by DWR.
3. All credits have been released and debited and updated ledgers showing zero credit
balances have been submitted and approved by DWR.
XI. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Upon the presentation of proper credentials, and during normal business hours, the Sponsor and
the landowner shall grant permission to the Director of DWR, or an authorized representative of
the Director of DWR to enter the property containing the Bank Parcel(s).
B. Amendments: This Banking Instrument maybe amended or modified only with written approval
of all signatory parties, including the USACE if it is applicable to the amendment.
C. Any transfer of the Sponsor's rights or obligations outlined in this Instrument or any other
agreement referenced in this Instrument to a third party must be approved by DWR prior to the
transfer.
D. Force Majeure: After 100% of all the credits have been released in accordance with the credit
release schedule in Section VIII and confirmation has been received by the DWR that the
Conservation Easement has been successfully assigned in compliance with Item H of Section V,
the Sponsor will not be responsible for Bank failure that is attributed to natural catastrophes
including but not limited to flood, drought, disease, regional pest infestation, etc. that are beyond
the control of the Sponsor.
E. However, if an event occurs before 100% of all the credits have been released in accordance with
the credit release schedule in Section VIII, the Sponsor shall take remedial action to restore the
property to its condition prior to the event, in a manner sufficient to provide adequate mitigation
to cover credits that were sold prior to the occurrence of the event. Such remedial action shall be
taken by the Sponsor only to the extent necessary and appropriate, as determined by DWR and
the Sponsor.
DWR must concur in writing that a force majeure event has occurred for this provision to apply.
F. Oversight: Actions taken by DWR may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Site visits,
2. Issuance of Site Viability Letters,
3. BPDP review and approval of items listed in Section V of this Instrument,
4. As -Built report review and approval of items listed in Section VI of this Instrument,
5. Monitoring Report review and approval of items listen in Section VI of this Instrument,
6. Credit Ledger review and approval of items listen in Section IX of this Instrument,
7. Certificate review of items listed in Section IX of this Instrument and cross analysis to
credit ledgers and,
8. Information requests, file reviews and audits.
13

Reports, ledgers, files and other information shall be made available to DWR upon request, unless
otherwise specified in this or any other document.
G. Validity of this Instrument: This Instrument will become valid on the date of the last party's
signature.
H. Specific Language of this Instrument Shall Be Controlling: To the extent that specific language in
this document changes, modifies, or deletes terms and conditions contained in those documents
that are incorporated into the Instrument by reference, and that are not legally binding, the
specific language within the Instrument shall be controlling.
I. Any disputes over decisions regarding this Instrument, shall be referred to the Director of DWR
for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S.
150B.
J. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and is entered into knowingly, intelligently and
voluntarily.
K. Notices: All Notices and other communication which may be or are required to be given or made
by any party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been properly given and
received on the date delivered in person, received via email with a delivery receipt requested, or
deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified, return receipt requested, to the
addresses set out below or at such other addresses as specified by written notice delivered in
accordance herewith.
If to Bank Sponsor: 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Shawn Wilkerson
[e-mail]
If to DWR: NC Division of Water Resources —401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Attn: Nutrient Offset and Buffer Banking Coordinator
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
14

M. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
By: Shawn D. Wilkerson (Print)
(Signature)
President of Wildlands Engineering,
Title: Manager of Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
Date:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY -DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
By:
Title:
Date:
15
(Print)
(Signature)

ID#* 20201940 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 06/22/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/22/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Company/Owner:* Wildlands Engineering
Contact Name:*
Andrea Eckardt
Project Information
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Rosewood Mitigation Site
County: Wayne
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Rosewood BPDP Draft 06.22.21.pdf 11.92MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Andrea Eckardt
Signature:*

BANK PARCEL
DEVELOPMENT
PACKAGE
June 2021
ROSEWOOD MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
Wayne County, NC
DWR Project Number 2020-1940
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
PREPARED BY:
WILDLANDS
F H u , " t F R I " G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Bank Parcel Development Package
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
Neuse River Basin
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Project Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1
Parcel Description......................................................................................................................... 1
2.0
Mitigation Project Summary.............................................................................................................
1
2.1
Project Goals.................................................................................................................................1
2.2
Existing Parcel Conditions.............................................................................................................2
2.3
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation..............................................3
2.4
Alternative Mitigation for Buffer Mitigation.................................................................................4
2.5
Watershed Characterization.........................................................................................................4
2.6
Soils...............................................................................................................................................5
2.7
Existing Vegetative Communities.................................................................................................6
2.8
Threatened and Endangered Species........................................................................................... 6
2.9
Cultural Resources........................................................................................................................
6
2.10
FEMA Floodplain Compliance.......................................................................................................7
2.11
Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access...........................................................................
7
2.12
Other Environmental Conditions..................................................................................................7
3.0
Site Protection Instrument................................................................................................................7
4.0
Mitigation Work Plan........................................................................................................................8
4.1
Parcel Preparation........................................................................................................................8
4.2
Riparian Area Restoration Activities.............................................................................................
8
4.3
Riparian Area Preservation Activities............................................................................................9
5.0
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan...................................................................................................9
5.1
Monitoring Protocol......................................................................................................................
9
5.2
Parcel Maintenance......................................................................................................................
9
5.3
Easement Boundaries.................................................................................................................
10
6.0
Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management.........................................................................
10
6.1
Financial Assurances...................................................................................................................
10
6.2
Long-term Management.............................................................................................................
10
7.0
Mitigation Potential........................................................................................................................
11
8.0
References......................................................................................................................................14
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page i June 2021

FIGURES
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Service Area Map
Figure 3
Site Map
Figure 4
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5
Watershed Map
Figure 6
NRCS 1976 Soil Survey Map
Figure 7
Buffer Credits Map
Figure 8
Riparian Buffer Zones Map
Figure 9
Monitoring Components Map
Tables
Table 1
Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Table 2
Buffer Project Attributes
Table 3
Project Features
Table 4
Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Table 5
Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Table 6
Site Protection Instrument
Table 7
Selected Tree Species
Table 8
Rosewood Project Mitigation Credits
Table 9
Rosewood Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
Table 10
Credit Release Schedule
APPENDIX
Site Photographs —January 6, 2021
Historical Aerials
On Site Determination of Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules — March 8, 2021
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter — April 19, 2021
USFWS Self -Certification Letter and Correspondence
SHPO Request for Review and Response
CP&L Easement Rights Supporting Documentation
EDR Radius Map Report, Executive Summary
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page ii June 2021

Bank Parcel Development Package
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
Neuse River Basin
Wildlands Holdings III
1.0 Project Introduction
The Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Parcel") is proposed under the terms and conditions of the
Rosewood Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Banking Instrument ("MBI"), made and entered into by
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC acting as Bank Sponsor ("Sponsor") and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality ("NCDE(X") Division of Water Resources ("NCDWR"). The Parcel shall be planned
and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 0213.0703, and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295 which became effective November 1, 2015.
The project is in Wayne County approximately 6 miles west of the City of Goldsboro (Figure 1).
Directions are included on Figure 1. The Parcel creates a protected riparian area from top of bank out to
200 feet along UT to Charles Branch, three unnamed tributaries (UT1, UT2, and UT3), and three project
ditches (D1, D2, and D3). Additionally, two non -project ditches (D4 and D5) exist within the Parcel. The
primary purpose of the project is to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits and nutrient offset credits
to compensate for unavoidable impacts in the Neuse River Basin 03020201 Hydrologic Unit Code
("HUC") outside the Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 2). The Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201200030 and NCDWR Subbasin 03-04-12 in Wayne County.
1.1 Parcel Description
The three unnamed tributaries and five ditches flow to the project feature UT to Charles Branch. UT to
Charles Branch extends for approximately 2 miles until it flows into Charles Branch. Charles Branch
eventually flows into the Neuse River. Charles Branch is classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters ("NSW")
by NCDWR. The proposed project supports specific goals identified in the 2018 Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities Plan (RBRP) by promoting "nutrient and sediment reduction in agricultural areas
by restoring and preserving wetlands, streams and riparian buffers".
This riparian mitigation project will reduce sediment and nutrient loading, provide and improve
terrestrial and instream habitats, and improve stream and bank stability. The area surrounding the
streams proposed for mitigation is currently agricultural fields, typically used to grow corn and
soybeans. See the Appendix for January 2021 site photos. Restoring the riparian area up to 200 feet
from the streams and ditches will reduce nutrient and sediment inputs in the tributaries to Charles
Branch and subsequently the Neuse River. The restored floodplain areas will filter sediment during high
rainfall events and provide cover and food for wildlife throughout the Parcel.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The major goals of the proposed buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project are to provide ecological
and water quality enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by restoring the riparian area to create a
functional riparian corridor. Specific enhancements to water quality and ecological processes are
outlined below in Table 1.
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 1 June 2021

Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goals
Objectives
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields
Decrease nutrient levels.
through restored native vegetation. The off -site nutrient input will also be
absorbed on -site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas,
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Decrease sediment input.
Sediment from off -site sources will be captured by deposition on restored
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
Decrease water
temperature and increase
Planted riparian trees will shade the project features as they mature, reducing
dissolved oxygen
thermal pollution.
concentrations.
Create appropriate
Riparian areas will be restored by treating invasive vegetation and planting
terrestrial habitat.
native vegetation.
Permanently protect the
project Parcel from
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
harmful uses.
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The proposed buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project includes approximately 47.2 acres of open
row crop fields along UT to Charles Branch, three unnamed tributaries (UT1, UT2, and UT3), three
project ditches (D1, D2, and D3), and two non -project ditches (D4 and D5). At the confluence of UT to
Charles Branch and UT1 lies a small section of existing forest. The Parcel easement boundary will extend
from top of bank to 200 feet. (Figure 3).
UT to Charles Branch flows southwest surrounded by agricultural fields crossing through an eighty -foot
overhead utility easement. The stream takes a sharp turn, flowing southeast through the same
agricultural fields. UT1 flows south and is surrounded by agricultural fields on its right side and
residential lots on its left outside of the easement. UT1 takes a sharp turn and starts to flow west until it
reaches UT to Charles Branch. Just downstream of the confluence of UT1 and UT to Charles Branch
begins a small section of established trees on the right bank of UT to Charles Branch. UT2 flows east
across the site surrounded by agricultural fields until the confluence with UT to Charles Branch. UT3
flows west across the site, into UT to Charles Branch. UT3 has agricultural fields on the right bank and
residential lots on the left. D1 flows southeast until its confluence with UT to Charles branch and is
surrounded by agricultural fields on its left side and a small buffer of existing trees on its right, which lies
outside of the easement. D2 flows west until its confluence with UT to Charles branch and is surrounded
by agricultural fields on both sides. D3 is surrounded by agricultural fields on both sides and flows
southeast until its confluence with UT1. Both D4 and D5 flow south until they reach their confluence
with UT3. The Site is characterized by a gently sloped valley dominated by agricultural fields.
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 2 June 2021

In general, this area has maintained its rural, farming character over the last 60 years with only minor
changes in land cover (see historical aerials in the appendix). This consistency in land use within the
project watershed indicates that watershed processes affecting hydrology, sediment supply, and
nutrient and pollutant delivery have not varied widely over this time period. With a lack of
developmental pressure, watershed processes and stressors from outside the project limits are likely to
remain consistent throughout the implementation, monitoring, and closeout of this project.
Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes
Project Name
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
Hydrologic Unit Code
03020201200030
River Basin
Neuse
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)
35.406567 W, 78.075854 N
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG)
To be recorded
Total Credits
723,006.400 buffer mitigation credits and 94,998.106 lbs. N
Types of Credits
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
BPDP Date
July 2021
Initial Planting Date
December 2022
Baseline Report Date
April 2023
MY1 Report Date
December 2023
MY2 Report Date
December 2024
MY3 Report Date
December 2025
MY4 Report Date
December 2026
MY5 Report Date
December 2027
2.3 Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
On February 25, NCDWR assessed the stream origin and issued the official Stream Origin Determination
Letter March 8, 2021. NCDWR performed an onsite visit of the project area to determine viability for
buffer mitigation and nutrient offset mitigation on March 25, 2021, and issued a site viability letter on
April 19, 2021. Five of the nine features assessed were deemed viable by NCDWR to generate buffer
mitigation. The Buffer Interpretation /Clarification Memo #2008-019 applies to D2, D4 and D5 where
maintenance of diffuse flow onsite is unattainable. The reduction in credits from the memo being
applied is documented in Figure 7 and Table 8. There have been no changes to land use in the project
area since NCDWR's 2021 site visit. A copy of both the "On -Site Stream Origin Determination for
Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules" and the "Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient
Offset" letters from NCDWR are included in the Appendix and summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Project Features
Feature Name
Feature Name
(NCDWR
Classification
Buffer Credit Viable
Nutrient Offset Viable
(BPDP)
Evaluation)
UT to Charles
UT to Charles
Yes
Branch
Branch
Stream
Yes
(non -forested fields only)
Yes
UT1
UT1a
Stream
Yes
(non -forested fields only)
UT1b
Stream
Yes
Yes
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 3 June 2021

Feature Name
Feature Name
(NCDWR
Classification
Buffer Credit Viable
Nutrient Offset Viable
(BPDP)
Evaluation)
Yes
UT2
UT2
Stream
Yes
(non -forested fields only)
Yes
UT3
UT3
Stream
Yes
(non -forested fields only)
Yes
D1
D1
Ditch
No
(non -forested left bank
side only)
D2
D2
Ditch
No
Yes
D3
D3
Ditch
No
Yes
D4
D4
Ditch
No
Yes*
* Ditch D4 was evaluated for buffer or nutrient viability but is not being proposed as part of this project therefore
not included in any credit requests.
2.4 Alternative Mitigation for Buffer Mitigation
In addition to buffer restoration on subject streams, per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rules (15A
NCAC 02B 0.0295 (o)), alternative mitigation is proposed on the Parcel in the form of buffer preservation
of forested land on subject streams. The proposed project is in compliance in the following ways:
Preservation on Subject Streams (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5):
• The buffer width is at least 30 feet from the stream (See Figure 8 for buffer zones). The
minimum width of riparian areas on this site is 50 feet from top of banks.
• The area meets the requirements of 15A NCAC 02R 0.0403(c)(7), (8), and (11) with no known
structures, infrastructure, hazardous substances, solid waste, or encumbrances within the
mitigation boundary (See Section 2.10 for EDR Radius Report summary).
• Mitigation credits for preservation are being requested on no more than 25% of the total area of
buffer mitigation (See Table 8 for credit calculations).
The following sections describe the existing riparian conditions on the Parcel in terms of watershed,
soils, geology, cultural resources, species of concern, regulated floodplain zones, and site constraints.
2.5 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within the HUC 03020201200030. All onsite features drain to UT to Charles Branch,
which flows for approximately 2 miles until it reaches Charles Branch. Charles Branch flows to the Neuse
River. Charles Branch is classified as C and NSW by NCDWR. Class C waters are designated for
recreational use, agriculture, fishing and fish consumption, and the maintenance of biological integrity
for wildlife. The NSW designation applies to surface waters that are experiencing excessive growths of
microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.
The topography of the Parcel, as indicated on the Northwest Goldsboro USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, shows low sloped areas throughout the Parcel (Figure 4). Drainage areas for the project
reaches (Figure 5) were delineated using 2-foot contour intervals derived from the North Carolina
Floodplain Mapping Program's 2017 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. Land uses draining to the
project reaches are primarily a mix of active crop fields, woodlands and developed space. The watershed
areas and current land use are summarized in Table 4, below.
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 4 June 2021

Table 4: Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Reach Name
Mitigation Area
(acres)
Watershed Area
(acres)
Land Use
UT to Charles Branch
15.9
1,006
62% agriculture, 18% forested, 20% developed
UT1
6.3
41
50% agriculture, 25% forested, 25% developed
UT2
1.9
186
60% agriculture, 20 % forested, 20% developed
UT3
5.5
53
35% agriculture, 5% forested, 60% developed
D1
2.5
84
10%agriculture, 30%forested, 30%scrubland, 30%
developed
D2
8.0
20
50%agriculture, 50%developed
D3
3.0
8
100% agriculture
2.6 Soils
The proposed Parcel is mapped by the Wayne County Soil Survey. Project area soils are described below
in Table 5. UT to Charles Branch, UT1, UT2, and UT3 are all depicted as streams on the 1974 NRCS Soil
Survey provided in Figure 6.
Table 5: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name
Description
Go — Goldsboro loamy sand, 0-
Goldsboro loamy sand consists of a moderately well drained soil on broad,
2%
smooth divides. Permeability is moderate and surface runoff is slow. Seasonal
slopes
high water table is around two and a half feet.
Weston loamy sand consists of poorly drained soil on smooth flats and in
We —Weston Loamy Sand
depressions on broad interstream divides. Permeability is moderate and
surface runoff is slow.
Po — Pamlico Muck —
Pamlico muck consists of poorly drained, nearly level organic soil on
0-2%
floodplains. Permeability is moderate and surface runoff is slow. These soils
slopes
are frequently flooded and somewhat poorly drained.
Rains sandy loam consists of poorly drained soil in oval depressions and on
Ra — Rains Sandy Loam, 0-2%
smooth flats in broad areas between streams. Permeability is moderate, and
slopes
surface runoff is slow. Water ponds in some places. Seasonal high water table
is at the surface.
Lynchburg sandy loam consists of poorly drained soil on broad, smooth flats
Ly - Lynchburg Sandy Loam
of interstream divides. Permeability is moderate and surface runoff is slow.
Seasonal high water table is around one and a half feet.
Source: Wayne County Soil Survey, June 1974, USDA-NRCS,
https://www.nres.usda.gov/Internet/FSE MANUSCRIPTS/north carolina/wayneNC1974/mapl9.pdf
https://www.nres.usda.gov/Internet/FSE MANUSCRIPTS/north—carolina/wayneNC1974/text.pdf
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 5 June 2021

2.7 Existing Vegetative Communities
Existing vegetation within the Parcel is primarily comprised of active row crop fields of corn and
soybeans with a small existing forest at the confluence of UT to Charles Branch and UT2 shown on Figure
3. Existing vegetation across the project area is detailed in Table 6.
Table 6: Existing Vegetation
Woody
Herbaceous
Species
Common Name
Species
Common Name
Acerrubrum
Red Maple
Arundinaria gigantea
Rivercane
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
Asplenium Platyneuron
Ebony Spleenwort
Baccharis spp.
Baccharis
Bignonia Capreolata
Cross Vine
Betula nigra
River Birch
Campsis radicans
Trumpet Creeper
Carya illinoinensis
Pecan Tree
Glechoma Hederacea
Creeping Charlie
Ilex opaca
American Holly
Juncus spp.
Rush
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese Privett
Lonicera japonica
Japanese Honeysuckle
Liquidambarstyraciflua
Sweetgum
MikaniaScandens
Climbing Hempvine
Melia azedarach
China Berry
Smilax rotundifolia
Greenbriar
Pinus Taeda
Loblolly Pine
Solidago spp.
Golden Rod
Prunus serotina
Black Cherry
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Quercus pagoda
Cherry Bark Oak
Quercus spp.
Unknown Oak
Rubus spp.
Black Berry
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Sambucus nigra
Elderberry
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Information for Planning and Consultation database (IPaC) were searched for federally listed threatened
and endangered plant and animal species in Wayne County, NC. Two listed endangered species and
three species proposed for listing as endangered or threatened were identified. Respectively, these are
the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the Tar River Spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana), the
Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), the Carolina Madtom (Notorus furiousus), and the Atlantic
Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni). Wildlands performed a pedestrian survey of the project parcel on January 6,
2021. It was determined that there is no suitable habitat for any of the listed species; therefore, the
project will have "no effect" on the federally listed species. The USFWS Self -Certification Letter packet
and the USFWS response letter agreeing with the determinations are included in the appendix.
2.9 Cultural Resources
There are no existing structures in the project area. The Parcel is not located near any sites listed on the
National Register with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). SHPO was contacted with request
for review and comment on January 27, 2021. SHPO responded on March 5, 2021 stating they are aware
of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. The SHPO response and request are
included in the Appendix.
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 6 June 2021

2.10 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
FEMA floodplain Zone AE intersects the southern end of the Parcel, along UT to Charles Branch. No
grading activities are proposed in the FEMA floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not be
required. No hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.
2.11 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access
The Parcel is accessible via a dirt road alongside a house at 753 NC 581 S. There are two crossings within
the Parcel. One break in the easement that crosses UT to Charles Branch downstream of UT1. The
second is an internal crossing at the confluence of D1 and UT to Charles Branch. A utility easement held
by CP&L also runs through the internal crossing. The CP&L easement does not allow the utility company
to alter the drainage on the property in anyway; therefore, the hydrologic connection between D1 and
UT to Charles Branch is unaffected by the utility easement and internal crossing. Supporting
documentation from the firm of Warren, Kerr, Walston, Taylor, and Smith LLP is included in the
Appendix. The internal crossing and utility easement will not be included in credit calculations.
Four culverts exist onsite, two of which will be removed. One culvert is located at the confluence of D1
and UT to Charles Branch and will remain. The culvert will be replaced that exists in the easement break
across UT to Charles Branch. The culvert at the confluence of D3 and UT1, as well as the culvert along D2
will be removed (Figure 7).
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions
An EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck was ordered for the Parcel through Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. on September 11, 2020. Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were
listed in any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. There were no
known or potentially hazardous waste sites identified within or immediately adjacent to the project area.
The Executive Summary of the EDR report is included in the Appendix.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes
portions of the parcels listed in Table 6. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its
entirety by an approved NCDWR long term stewardship, and will be managed under the terms detailed
in an approved NCDWR conservation easement.
Table 7: Site Protection Instrument
Landowner
PIN
County
Site
Protection
Instrument
Deed Book
and Page
Number
Acreage
to be
Protected
Waters, Ronald E and W Paula
2670-53-4130
2670-55-3301
2670-55-5457
2670-55-5505
Conservation
To Be
Wayne
y
47.5
2670-55-6317
Easement
Recorded
Spring Hill Family Farms, LLC
2670-55-7320
2670-55-3851
2670-55-4654
2670-55-4703
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 7 June 2021

4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land along UT to Charles Branch, three unnamed
tributaries (UT1, UT2, and UT3) and three project ditches (D1, D2, and D3) on the Parcel to a protected
riparian corridor, improving the ecological function of the area. The project design will ensure that no
adverse impacts to existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 7 illustrates the conceptual design for the
Parcel. Figure 8 further depicts the riparian buffer zones for the Parcel.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land use within 200 feet from top of bank of the project features has been maintained and cleared
for row crop cultivation except for a small, forested area along UT to Charles Branch spanning from its
confluence with UT1 to its confluence with UT2. This area is slated for preservation. Areas slated for
restoration will require little site preparation because the land has been maintained in agriculture;
therefore, soil disturbance during planting of the project will be minimal. A culvert on D2 will be
removed, along with a culvert along UT1 at its confluence with D3. Following the disturbance at these
two locations, coir matting, live stakes, and native seed will be applied. UT to Charles Branch has two
locations where minor bank stabilization work will be completed. These areas include one small section
on the left side of the stream, directly adjacent to the preservation area, along with one area just
downstream of the preservation area, on the right bank. A small area along UT1 where the stream
makes a turn and flows west will also include minor bank stabilization. For both UT to Charles Branch
and UT1 stabilization will involve the application of coir matting, live stakes, and native seed.
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree
establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent undesirable species from out -competing
planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the riparian areas of the Parcel will include a
mixture of the species listed in Table 7 below.
Table 8: Selected Tree Species
Species
Common Name
Density
Forest Strata
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
15%
Canopy
Betula nigra
River Birch
15%
Canopy
Diospryos virginiana
Common Persimmon
10%
Canopy
Prunus serotina
Black Cherry
10%
Canopy
Quercus pagoda
Cherrybark Oak
10%
Canopy
Quercus falcata
Southern Red Oak
5%
Canopy
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
10%
Canopy
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
10%
Canopy
Magnolia virginiana
Sweetbay Magnolia
5%
Sub -canopy
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 8 June 2021

Species
Common Name
Density
Forest Strata
Acer negundo
Boxelder
10%
Canopy
Trees will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of five years. No one tree species will be
greater than 50% of the established stems. The proposed planting area includes both the areas
identified as Buffer Restoration and Nutrient Offset Credits on Figure 7. Planting is scheduled for
December 2022.
4.3 Riparian Area Preservation Activities
There will be no parcel preparation work done in the buffer preservation areas, as allowed under 15A
NCAC 02B .0295(o). There is a section along UT2 and UT to Charles Branch of mature hardwood forest
that will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement (Figure 7). No additional treatment or
planting is planned for these areas of the project.
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the buffer restoration and
enhancement areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. The plots will be randomly placed
throughout the planted riparian areas. A total of 34 plots will be established within the riparian buffer
restoration areas and will be randomly placed such that the plots are representative of the buffer
mitigation and nutrient offset credit areas (Figure 9). The size of individual quadrants will be 100 square
meters.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner
of each of the 34 plots. Overview photos will be taken each monitoring year and provided in the annual
reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first growing season, at least five
months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the fall season. Species composition,
height, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot. The total number of volunteer
woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of vegetative success for the Parcel
will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than
50% of the established planted stems, and an established density of at least 260 planted trees per acre
at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Appropriate and desirable native volunteer species may be
included in the Parcel's density to meet the performance standards with NCDWR approval.
The Sponsor shall submit the annual monitoring report to NCDWR by December 315Y of each year for five
consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the MBI.
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented.
Maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought,
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 9 June 2021

or insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the
success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. A rigorous herbicide
schedule may need to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration
areas to prevent establishment of invasive species that may out -compete the planted native vegetation.
The only herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in
accordance with North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
NCDWR. If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must
receive approval from NCDWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of
the Neuse buffers to ensure that no buffer violations have occurred.
5.3 Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by marker, post, tree -blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement prior to the NCDWR As -Built inspection.
Boundary markers that have been disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as needed basis. Contact information for the conservation easement holder will be included on
easement markers.
6.0 Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
Following approval of the Rosewood Bank Parcel Development Package, the Sponsor shall provide a
Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best. The
Performance Bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as
described in the Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP), but not less than $150,000.00. In lieu of
posting the performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit
release. In that case no performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less
than $100,000.00. The Performance/Maintenance Bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring
period for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon NCDWR
approval, this may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to NCDWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. NCDWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are
submitted without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
6.2 Long-term Management
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved NCDWR long term
stewardship, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved NCDWR conservation
easement. The long-term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure
that the restrictions documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity.
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 10 June 2021

7.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the 47.5 acres protected under the conservation easement, the mitigation activity for 41.8 acres is
riparian restoration. Of that 41.8 acres of restoration, 16.6 acres is proposed for buffer mitigation credit
and 25.2 acres is proposed for nutrient offset credit. There is also 0.34 acres of preservation within the
conservation easement proposed for riparian buffer credit. The Buffer Interpretation /Clarification
Memo #2008-019 applies to Ditches D2, D4, and D5 where maintenance of diffuse flow onsite is
unattainable, therefore a total of 0.25 acres is removed from the creditable area at the top of Ditches
D2, D4, and D5. The mitigation credit calculations were derived based on Wildlands' conceptual design
for maximum ecological uplift. The management objectives, mitigation type, and proposed amount of
buffer mitigation are presented in Tables 8 and 9, below. The buffer restoration areas are viable for
either riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset credits and can be converted upon receiving written
approval by NCDWR if within the first 100 feet from top of bank for the areas on UT to Charles Branch,
UT1, UT2, and UT3. There will be three credit ledgers for the project: Buffer Restoration, Buffer
Preservation, and Nitrogen.
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 11 June 2021

kof
�
)
!k§
z0
i3
�
�
�
\ \
�
�
\\\
c
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
k
\\\\\\
\
- -
(7—
\
-
-
-
lo
-
�
{2
`
` E
ƒ
>
>
z
z
\
o
}
}
}
}
}
(
\\\\z0
}\\
\
\
[
2#�
�
)
t

Table 10: Rosewood Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
721,589
721,536.500
Preservation:
14,699
1,469.900
Total Riparian Buffer:
736,288
723,006.400
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient
Offset:
Nitrogen:
1,098,949
57,344.627
Phosphorus:
0.000
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by NCDWR,
the mitigation credits associated with the Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel will be released as
described in Table 11 below.
Table 11: Credit Release Schedule
Task
Project Milestone
% Credit Available
for Sale
Instrument and BPDP Approved by NCDWR, Conservation Easement
1
Recorded and Financial Assurance Posted
20
Mitigation Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring
2
Devices Completed
20
3
Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As -Built Report
10
Monitoring Report #1: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance
4
renewed
10
Monitoring Report #2: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance
5
renewed
10
Monitoring Report #3: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance
6
renewed
10
Item B(1) of Section X in this Instrument has been completed and
7
approved by NCDWR
5
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an
approved land trust or stewardship
Monitoring Report #4: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance
8
renewed
5
Monitoring Report #5: Approved by the NCDWR and final site visit by
9
NCDWR has been conducted
10
Total
100
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 13 June 2021

8.0 References
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), 2010. 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration
Priorities Plan (RBRP).
https://fi les.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Neuse_River_Basin/FINAL
%20RBRP%2ONeuse%202010—%2020111207%2000RRECTED.pdf
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 2009. Mineral Resources.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Mineral%20resources/mineraIresources.htmI
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2019. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Wayne County, NC. https://www.ncnhde.natureserve.org
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2006. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil
Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Wayne County, North Carolina.
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Wayne County, NC. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 14 June 2021

Figures

-V s�Hi�hway.7a�W
!r �0 Td
i Evare; Rd '
2r
� has
�fr
G
M7 ktor14.GrOcn Rd
IY
n
0
0
a
If
01
F ec6�
ktWILDLANDS
wv E N G 1 N E E R I N 0
4
2,
IF
w
❑uaker
Neck Lake
x
R,yerhe
%f Ra
crt,f1 Fermi Rd
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
Rosewood Bank Parcel Location
o,� s
Ra
Sn'�rrfm��
a,
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 Miles Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
I i I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201
Wayne County, NC

I Ii
r l County Boundaries
I I - t----•
® HUC 03020201
• H?nd?rson I �
i f u service Area
` + I
� Rosewood Bank Parcel Location
1
� I �
k ! i Louisburg
40
lirrr..1111 •�•
a�mry' /1 F� ••••�'�
! o
�luperl{ill
i
•1 +
�If
� ap
RA"n
Roc►
Saabs Park
Eltjw5
Lflllrx)lon craek cc-,
F.
03020201
Erwin
D unn
s^lalk�rtn.•.n
r
�..• Lunrhee
-.r••� SdSsa
.n� le
.,I ring Lake
v ..i tx•��� i
WILDLANDS
ENGIiNEERING
1 I I
��
f % I .•r•
i r-•�
Figure 2 Service Area Map
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
1� Miles Bank Parcel Development Package
J I Neuse River Basin 03020201
Wayne County, NC

Figure 3 51te Map
W I L D L A N D 5 0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
ENGINEERING I I I I I t Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

MWAriii� Or
.__.. ,
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
RA 8 TRL
I�
TR
►� •
Y 1
11' II
I
I
Northwest Goldsboro, USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
WILDLANDS
kt� ENCyINEERING
Figure 4 U5G5 Topographic Map
0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
1 I I I I Bank Parcel development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

B
IL
o
N Y
�
c a
V
0
rc
o
� N
m
N
z
a
o
m
0
w
Lu
�z
qz
LLJ

�� �:, ,ram • — -
�' F �� Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
icr `y
• i �.Y_■
I' a}
l� r
1
s�
Ra
En
�.et Dr
jw
•
LyL►.
+N 'r L
ANN
S I
1 + I nr r
' V
I
r +� �`y•
ti
� * 1
i
i
GO
K �
GO Ly
�__19:74 NRCS Soil Survey of Wayne County - Sheet 19 -
%Z WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Figure 6 1974 NRCS Soil Survey Map
0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
i Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Existing Culvert to be Removed
1 i
■
1y
i
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
F
Project Stream
u
Project Ditch
�+{
a
Buffer Restoration
Buffer Preservation
®
Nutrient Offset
Not for Credit
/
Internal Crossing
Utility Easement
Non -Project Stream
r
••••--•
Non -Project Ditch
Existing Utility Line
Existing Culverts
Existing Culvert to be Replaced IJ • `
1 Existing Culvert to be Removed
ON A. \
i ;IM,
ti■ far �"" . r+ 3_"' � �� ��
I - 1.7
�. r•
WILDLANDS
ft,,, ENGINEERING
Figure 7 Buffer Credits Map
0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
a Project Stream
. ■;.� . ■ Project Ditch
NN
Buffer Zones i
a:• � 50' from Tap of Bank
■. 100' from Top of Bank
■
200' from Top of Bank
Non -Project Stream
Non -Project Ditch
10
-
1"
1 I'
i [_
•� _ _
■
kt;WILDLANDS
vv ENGINEERING
Figure S Riparian Buffer Zones Map
0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Bank Parcel
I I i I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Y � 71,
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
Project Stream
5, M
] e "i Project Ditch
❑ Buffer Restoration
❑ '■ w! Buffer Preservation
Nutrient Offset
❑ N, : a.
5 ❑ ,�� Not for Credit
4
F Utility Easement
•� '
❑ ❑ ❑ Internal Crossing
f ❑ Existing Utility Line
�# ❑
- Non -Project Stream
0^
Non -Project Ditch
_ d Existing Culverts
�� ❑ Vegetation Plots
.-.■ t ❑
1
■
1 1 ❑
❑ ❑Ll
, 1
❑ ❑ r owl'
El
❑
t ' 7 .
04
l �� � r riYrY�► * " r
46
Figure 9 Monitoring Components Map
1*,WILDLANDS 0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Appendix

CURRENT LAND USE PHOTOGRAPHS
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel

UT to Charles Branch
UT to Charles Branch — South End - Downstream (0110612021)
UT to Charles Branch — South End - Upstream (0110612021)
W
UT to Charles Branch — South End - Upstream (0110612021)
UT to Charles Branch — North Eastern End - Downstream
-C—
(0110612021)
UT to Charles Branch — North Eastern End - Upstream UT to Charles Branch — Downstream of D2 Confluence
(0110612021) (0110612021)
Roseowood Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

UT to Charles Branch — Upstream of D2 Confluence
(0110612021)
Roseowood Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

UT1
UT1— Downstream (0110612021)
UT1— Upstream (0110612021)
UT2
UT2 — Downstream (0110612021)
UT1— Downstream (0110612021)
UT1— Upstream (0110612021)
UT2 — Upstream (0110612021)
Roseowood Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

Roseowood Mitigation Bank Parcel
`�'� HUC 03020201

D1
D1— Downstream (0110612021)
D2
R&-
D2 — Downstream (0110612021)
D2 — Upstream (01/06/2021) 1
D1— Upstream (0110612021)
R�
■
D2 — Downstream (0110612021)
Roseowood Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

D3
D3 — Downstream (0110612021)
D4 — Downstream (0110612021)
D4 — Upstream (01/06/2021)
D3 — Upstream (0110612021)
D4 — Upstream (0110612021)
D4 — Upstream (01/06/2021)
Roseowood Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

� rt - i �_'' �•+ is �•
l
w
4�r
INOL)IRY #:6187845.5 N
YEAR: 2016
= 625' FOR
S. k
F-:-

_ tea"'. �' 7-�
sue' •��
%A\�
.... .....
I
rr {
.�Ak�
INQUIRY k 6187845.5
YEAR: 2012
= 625'
AWJ

f

Me
INOUIRY #:6187845.5 N
YEAR: 1993
= 625' FOR

YEAR: 1973 II N
= 625' EDR
L'
S '
a
a R�
♦ p
Y y
! <
�► r r � r
• Subject boundary not shown because it
exceeds image extent or image is not
georeferenced.

T
1 L
f •, i, a
r
44
INQU4RY #:6187845.5 iN
YEAR: 1964
= 625'�DR' ,

! % 1
■ -i
�r-
INQUIRY #:6187845.5 N
YEAR: 1961
= 625' FOR

1'
� •J
.R r
w
A {
\ S
14 W.
INQUIRY #: 6187845.5
YEAR: 1959 N�jJr ' I�
= 625' FOR ;y*

,_
x:1w
r
R�,
f
E
!'7
o Z
f.
1
ti•
INQUIRY #: 6187845.5 i.N
YEAR: 1950
= 625' (rEOR'

DocuSign Envelope ID: 24F8388A-94ED-4E4C-8052-4F634C1 1 AF06
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 8, 2021
DWR Project # 20201940
Wayne County
Ronald and Paula Waters
165 Perkins Mill Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Spring Hill Farms LLC
Frank and Lynette Howell
106 J&L Drive
Goldsboro, NC 27560
(via email to [e-mail])
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
Project Name: Rosewood Bank Parcel
Address / Location: West of Goldsboro adjacent to NC 581S (35.407260-78.075280)
Determination Date: February 25, 2021 Staff: Rick Trone
Ms. Eckardt,
On February 25, 2021, Rick Trone of the Division of Water Resources conducted an on -site review of
features located on the subject property at the request of Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to determine
the applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714).
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated. This information is also summarized in the
table below. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most recently
published NRCS Soil Survey of Wayne County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic
(at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics
that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not Subject"
have been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features
located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features
on the site may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
subject to the Clean Water Act.
The following table addresses the features rated during the DWR site visit:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
EQ�� 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Noanlcexa2:. �
oepenmenemim���i o�si r 919,707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: 24F8388A-94ED-4E4C-8052-4F634C1 1 AF06
DWR # 20201940 Ver 1 Rosewood Bank Parcel
Wayne County
Page 2 of 3
Feature
Depicted
Depicted on
Type"
Subject
Start @
Stop @
on
ID
Soil Survey
USGS To o
p
UT to
Outside project
Charles
I
X
Outside project boundary
boundary
X
X
Branch
UT1
I
X
Approximately 35.406204
UT to Charles Branch
X
X
-78.073560
UT2
I
X
Outside project boundary
UT to Charles Branch
X
X
UT3
I
X
Outside project boundary
UT to Charles Branch
X
D1
D
Outside project boundary
UT to Charles Branch
D2
D
I Outside project boundary
UT to Charles Branch
D3
I
Outside project boundary
UT1
Approximately 35.407521
D4
D
-78.075585
UT1
(1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Present, NE=Not Evaluated, D = Ditch
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this
letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) calendar days.
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project
easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Rick Trone at (919)
707-3631 or [e-mail]. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles
3 & 4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
DOCUSigned by:
949D91 BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures: USGS Topographical Map, NRCS Soil Survey, Site Map
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files

DocuSign Envelope ID: 24F8388A-94ED-4E4C-8052-4F634C1 1 AF06
DWR # 20201940 Rosewood Bank Parcel
Wayne County
Page 3 of 3
r '} ' '! "4- —r -
Site Map'
y x
Map provided by Wildlands
�k r
Engineering, Inc. ,X!011�
44 �R
k
� tY
\k
F 4
t �
kx
27.
7
ti
I
�4
AIL
i
.. + �-,-. .I"
- �
IOn
f r
L. d = ' � � Ali•
JJ
� � f
,y7 t
I Y
--_-
r �
1 �
7 tJ
T _
I
7l
PrajL&rt Loration
L __� Napared Conservation Easement �y ;
i
Utility Ease me r1t � " '••�
Proj9rC Streartl
+IA,++01F Projehrt Ditch
Non-PrajerkStrimm .s .
F
Figure 1_ Site Map
Oft'WILDLANDS d 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Rank Parcel
ENGINr:EkirrG I I I I I t NeuseRlverBasin (03020201)
Wayne County, FCC

DocuSign Envelope ID: 24F8388A-94ED-4E4C-8052-4F634C1 1 AF06
Rosewood Bank Parcel
Wayne County, NC-DWR Project # 20201940
44
41 - i UT to Charles
Branch: Subject
00
Y... r
xaAr
D r
Al
i •�.i• `il `fir•}.. '. ... •
'r�r• •M1¢ zL ry
' 1 lJ •• � :r�� .b
J �`.:{,!,-. •; ',• �::w UTI: Subject
�x+1 �Ll ' •• l ~�+ ry�
4 �.+ L T• l'.Y�ry�,�..`.'-'•: k fir: Y f�..•k l'• r�5 L
` � r� .. Lit•• K� � y �
III
{: .
0 Ra
Kill
UT2: Subject }
Go
Ly' UTI Subject
PO
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 13��
Nix
Wayne CO NC 1974 ,. Locations are approximate
Ir i
Legend and are provided for refer-
� ence only
-property boundary FVT

DocuSign Envelope ID: 24F8388A-94ED-4E4C-8052-4F634C1 1 AF06
Rosewood Bank Parcel
Wayne County, NC-DWR Project # 20201940
f
i
YY EL L T
I
USGS Topographical Map r�5rA?Z
NW Goldsboro Quadrangle 2019 ,. � Locations are approximate
a and are provided for refer -
Legend: {F
- { enceonly::
-property boundary. '
.dPAE
I

DocuSign Envelope ID: B8819A47-3E1A-4AFB-B8D6-8094CEE855C2
ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE ❑ELLFGATTI
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
£nvironmenraI Quality
April 19, 2021
Andrea Eckardt
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Rosewood Site
867 NC Hwy 581 Hwy S, Goldsboro (near 35.403316,-78.075560)
Neuse 03020201
Wayne County
Dear Ms. Eckardt,
On March 23, 2021, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of Wildlands Engineering, Inc (Wildlands) for a site visit near the above -
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed conservation easement boundary, which is more accurately depicted in the attached map
labeled "Figure 1-Site Map" (Figure 1) prepared by Wildlands. The proposed easement boundary in
Figure 1, includes all riparian areas intended to be proposed as part of a private mitigation bank. On
March 25, 2021, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with Wildlands
were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature
Classification
tSublect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
','Mitigation Type Determination Win
onsite
to
riparian areas
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
Buffer
0( 200')
Viable
Viable
Rule
UTla
Stream
No
Right Bank - non -forested
2Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
agricultural fields
forested
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
fields only)
Left Bank - mature forest
Forested Areas — Preservation Site per
with areas of maintained
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
lawn
UTlb
Stream
Yes
non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
fields; a compromised
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
culvert is present and is
proposed to be removed
Compromised culvert needs to be removed
or replaced to restore flow and allow for
aquatic life passage
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
_ ✓ 512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
urn,n m� wo�ir 919,707,9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: B8819A47-3E1A-4AFB-B8D6-8094CEE855C2
Rosewood Site
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
April 19, 2021
Feature
Classification
1Subiect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4.5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to
riparian areas
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
Buffer
0-200'
Viable
Viable
Rule
UT2
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
zYes
Yes ( non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
fields with a small forested
forested
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
area
fields only)
Forested Areas — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
UT3
Stream
Yes
Right Bank - non -forested
Yes
Yes (non-
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
agricultural with some
forested ag
.0295 (n)
debris in the channel; Left
fields only)
Bank - maintained lawn
Need to remove small/medium debris from
(not included within
the channel
easement boundary)
UT to
Stream
Yes
Compromised culvert at
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
Charles
UTl with eroding channel,
forested
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Branch
mostly non -forested
fields only)
agricultural fields and some
Forested Areas — Preservation Site per
forested areas; located
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
within two DOT Right Of
Ways (ROW)
Minor bank stabilization and grading
needed where bank stability is
compromised and where erosional rills,
sink holes and gullies are observed.
Culvert must be replaced.
Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
D1
Ditch
No
Left Bank - Non -forested
No
Yes (non-
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
>3' depth
agricultural fields; overhead
forested
.0295 (n)
utility easement present @
left bank
confluence w/ UT Charles
side only)
*Note: Must be able to secure hydrologic
Branch
*see note
connection to UT to Charles Branch and
Right Bank - timbered
have a contiguous riparian restoration to
UT to Charles Branch to be viable for
credits. A survey of the exact location of
the utility easement is needed to make this
final determination
D2
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
>3' depth
fields
.0295 (n)
D3
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
>3' depth
fields
.0295 (n)
Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: B8819A47-3E1A-4AFB-B8D6-8094CEE855C2 Rosewood Site
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
April 19, 2021
Feature
Classification
'Subject
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
Buffer
Credit
'Nutrient
Offset
4.5Miti2ation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to
riparian areas
Buffer
0-200'
Viable
Viable
Rule
D4
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
*see note
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
<3' depth
fields
.0295 (o)(8)
*Buffer Mitigation Note - Assessment
concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More
information is required to be provided
in a mitigation plan for complete
assessment. See rule.
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 8, 2021 (1D# 2020-1940) using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by
the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
'Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were based on the proposed conservation easement
boundaries depicted in Figure 1 for the site. The map representing the proposal for the site is
attached to this letter and is initialed by Ms. Merritt on April 19, 2021. Substantial changes to the
proposed easement boundaries could affect the site's potential to generate buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on April 19, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: B8819A47-3E1A-4AFB-B8D6-8094CEE855C2 Rosewood Site
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
April 19, 2021
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
PW/kym
Attachments: "Figure 1 — Site Map"
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
E/�DocuSsigned by:
/�iLWG WI02
949D916A53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: B8819A47-3E1A-4AFB-B8D6-8094CEE855C2
iO
�O
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
DS
Internal Crossing
anal
Utility Easement
Project Stream 4/19/2021
a
'
Project Ditch
jPowerline
Non -Project Ditch
r
• .
C Existing Culverts
t �
Existing Culvert
♦ to be Removed i
�e ♦
_ � %i'Ais
!gyp
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
=
r-
T
•
Existing Culvert
N\
1
t.
to be Removed
t�
Now
4WOMMW
r
r f
Figure 1. Site Map
0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
I I I I I Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

QPQ�a,6NT OF
o p
�4RC!-1 3, 1ap9
United States Department of the
Project Name
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 0 1 /27/202
Self -Certification Letter
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
Dear Applicant:
Interior
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleigh(c,fws.gov or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

0
i
cz
O_
Y
C
ca
CO
C
O
cu
Lm
O
O
O
O
Of
0
E
cz
Z
U
0
.o
aD
aD
C
C -O
C _0
C
(n
E E 03 N
U
E >
N
E� �
E C
E
cII D LL
p
O
O
�
in N co
'06 .0 O O U
— (II
-0 C a, M Q
'O
-00 M Q
2i (B 'O
-00 LLLL
2i
>. O
O
(n
2� L ._�
2� 0 0� 0
2� L Z C
3: QL Z C
2i 0-0
C
C V
Q 'O (D
cz U L
-6 U L
-6
C
N 'p U U
O O O
cV
N O -O N
O 0 cB O
CV m
N E Z
O— 3:
O
N C U Z
0 0 +- 2i
' �
cV C
0 0 0
cV
C 0
O Q -O C
CO :-
cn O C
O 0 2i
O 0)
N cII O N
Y L .—
O
N C
V N
O O_ .—
CO
C 0 C
O
O
0
L' 0 E
Q .V O
L- 2i O� 0 Y
U X
�' (II Ucii 0
:- X
0
L'
:- cz 0
L' C C OO
(II
cn
:-- 0
cz
_�
2i
C O Q.a, 0
U C
C 0 0 C
C 0 0 0 U
O C
cn
C O cn 0 O
Q C
cn
C 0 0
-O
O
Z Q 0
O D N
� (D cz
O, O 0 0
c� z N
O-0
U
Z O N
cc-0 cn U
= C x O
0-0 0
cn
N
- L N (D
V
C .— Q 0-0
c6 !
C 0 UC_
U
C-0 C, 0
'6
N N~ ""' C 0
0 N .� 0 p
0 0 0 �0 0
0 N U �0 0
0
O N CII cD
'O
Q. O U
a�
3 0 NCZ II
= cv -0
Z3 0 U (n
-0 n .a? �
j� (n
-0 n
� L
-0 n
0)
C
C N 0 (II O O
p 0 `� Q
U
C N -O 0
0 0 0 (II O_ cn
U� O
E
C w —0 EL
0 0 0 (n
U
C N Q E
O CZ 'O (n
U�
�
C N 2
O cz - Z=
U�
cz
CB
X
cn (D cB 0 'O
cp =
cn 0. C
Z
P 0
N 'O C
0 0 0
co co C
cz U.
CO L �
Z
O
C
(II (B (II (II N
0 Z6 L U
0 (II N D
(B 0 0
(II (B — .--�
E
0 L O U OO
0 L cn Z
D L O0 >-
0 L �� Y
0 L 0
co
U0
Z Q U
Q
Q 'O C C
0 -O C�
cn
O U
co
0
Z3 0
� '6 z 0
0 C
cz
OO L
0
0
(II
0
(n H (II
4J
U
(n Z U C
C
N
cz C 0
-6 (II N U
� O Z C
cz cn 0 (n
'O E
Z3 0
c 0
-O C U
C
cz 0
-6 >+ C U
._CM
(II 0 0
1_ >+ Q
L
-;E
jL N 0 0 -E
(D CZ
jL N 2 U
O
jL U L .N Q'p
0 O
E Cl) (II 'in Q'p
U
LT cn CB U U
Z
a C cn MO 2i
Q C in O D
Q C 2i 06
Q C 06
Q C O
Z
N
U
Q
�
�
0
Of
0)
ca
E
LU
ti
O_
C O
O 'C
U
Q
0 —
E
m
c/)
Q Z5
Lu
LU
LU
LU
LU
W
(n N
O
O
O
O
O
O
LU cn
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
C
C
C
C
C
C
cOn
N
coO
2
cOn
N
cOn
N
cn
N
_
cn
cOn
Q
M
Q
Q
Q
C
N
Q
CB
CII
CB
CII
CB
�
L
L
L
L
L
N
2
C
O
0
0
0
0
0
L
-E
Z
:E
-E
ia
]D-co
cB
Z
U
:3
cn
Z3
cn
:3
cn
Z3
cn
Z3
cncr,
C
Y 0
—
+-
U
C
U
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
_
C
Z
N
N
Y
E
cz
O1
(D
Q
^
Z
_0
O
z co
Ucz
E
3
O
co E
Z3cn
O
Q >,
(D
�_
>co
co (II
O
O1CO
� a
co
Of
�
C
-Q Y
O
cE
cE U
_�
c7
�
cB
2
cn
.0
w N
cn
i—
O—
a ;
O C
>
._�
cz
W
Fz
0
U Z
N
w cz
O -
U 0
U CZ
—
cz
'+0
cn/
zz
ZU
6—
�Q
W�
o
U
N
U
cz
M
Q
E
Z3
O
cz
C
O
cn
U
0
0
E
O
cz
Y
cz
E
O
U N
cn N
2
_ O
0
O
0
0
L
0 O
cz
0
cn
Z3
2
N
U
0
O
Q
0
O
O
0
O
Q
a
E
Z3
O
cz
C
O
.Z6
E
O
C
O
cz
0
L cn
cz
L cz
0
cz c N
O C
i 0
C :3 U
E
O1 cz C
(D (D— °J
s E
C
O
U E c
Q.- w
(6
0
CO

ygp]OF fi . . a.
FP-iLni n�Liu irr
United States Department of the Interior W R
M0 #�FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
$ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726 -
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: December 14, 2020
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0373
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00804
Project Name: Rosewood
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

12/14/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00804
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratory birds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

12/14/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00804
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

12/14/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00804
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

12/14/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00804 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0373
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00804
Project Name: Rosewood
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: Buffer restoration project
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. oogle.com/maps/place/35.407304848300996N78.0753428817585W
Counties: Wayne, NC

12/14/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00804
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

12/14/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00804
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile: hnps:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
February 3, 2021
Carolyn Lanza
Environmental Scientist
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Rosewood Mitigation Site, Wayne County, NC
Dear Ms. Lanza:
Thank you for your submittal of the above -listed project through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) Online Project Review Process. The Service has reviewed the Online Project
Review package submitted by email on January 27, 2021. Our comments are provided pursuant
to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act (the Act).
The submitted package included a self -certification letter, a species conclusions table and a
species list printout from the Information, Planning, and Consultation System (IPaQ website.
No other information was included concerning species surveys or the potential activities on site
(methods of construction, measures to avoid and minimize impacts on the site and downstream,
etc.). The submitted documents indicate that the waterbodies on the site do not contain suitable
habitat for listed aquatic species or species proposed to be listed. However, the proposed project
is just upstream of occupied NRWD habitat in Beaverdam Creek and the Neuse River. The
NRWD was proposed for listing as threatened on May 21, 2019. A listing decision is still
pending.
The Service is pleased to see this proposal for compensatory mitigation in a watershed with
known records of sensitive species and we encourage stream and wetland projects in these
watersheds, because of the potential benefits to species downstream. However, we caution that
the potential effects of the proposed plans and construction methods should be carefully
considered during review.
The submittals do not consider the potential effects to listed and proposed aquatic species
downstream of the site, including the NRWD. In general, outside of stream reaches where listed
or proposed aquatic species are found, in -water work is acceptable and encouraged; particularly
with stringent adherence to sediment and erosion control requirements. Carefully -planned
restoration, enhancement, or preservation of those streams may provide great benefits to the
species downstream. Beneficial effects to species, as well as detrimental effects, are considered
"effects" for the purposes of the ESA.
Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. We recommend that all practicable
measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to sensitive aquatic species, including avoiding in-

water work in reaches with occupied habitat, implementing stringent sediment and erosion
control measures, constructing the project in the dry, and maintaining any remaining natural,
vegetated buffers on streams on the project site (if applicable).
The Service encourages you to continue project planning on this site, due to the potential benefits
to aquatic species in Beaverdam Creek and the Neuse River. However, because the Service does
not currently have enough information concerning the project plans and construction methods,
we cannot concur with your species determinations at this time. We look forward to
coordinating with you and reviewing more information concerning this project.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact Kathy Matthews of this office at
[e-mail]. Please note that Service staff are teleworking to lessen the spread
of COVID-19. Email is the best way to reach us.
Sincerely
A--
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
cc (via email):
USACE
USEPA
NCDWR
NCWRC

W ILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
February 8, 2021
Kathryn Matthews
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh ES Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
Submitted via email: [e-mail]
Subject: Rosewood Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wayne County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Matthews,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect
to fish and wildlife issues associated with a potential riparian buffer restoration project on the Rosewood
Mitigation Bank Parcel located in Wayne County, NC. A Site Map is enclosed. The site is located at latitude
35.406567 longitude-78.075854.
The Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel is being developed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation
in the Neuse River basin. The project will include buffer restoration and preservation along four unnamed
tributaries and four ditches. This buffer mitigation project will reduce sediment and nutrient loading, provide and
improve terrestrial and in stream habitats, and improve stream and bank stability. The area surrounding the
streams and channels proposed for buffer restoration is currently row crop agricultural fields. Restoring the
vegetative buffer on the areas up to 200 feet from the streams and ditches will remove the crops and fertilizer
inputs within the project area. The restored floodplain areas will filter sediment during high rainfall events. The
establishment of riparian buffers will create shading to minimize thermal heating. Finally, newly planted native
vegetation will provide cover and food for wildlife.
The major goals of the proposed buffer restoration project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by creating a functional riparian corridor and restoring the riparian buffer.
Waters of the United States 404/401 permitting is not required for this buffer mitigation site as construction
activities will only involve planting riparian vegetation and will not impact project streams or downstream
resources.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any
questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Carolyn Lanza, Environmental Scientist
clanza(cDwildlandseng.com
313.969.7318
Attachments: Figure 1 Site Map
WildIands Engineering, Inc. (P) 704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

♦�
♦
:
�
1
oo
` '
� 1
\i
1
i
I
�t
t
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
i
1
Project Location
Proposed Conservation
Easement
Utility Easement
Project Stream`
A�
- . ✓ Q
Project Ditch
an
r^�
Non -Project Stream
Figure 1. Site Map
wwW I L D L 11 N D S 0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
E N G I iV E E R I N G I i i i I Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

Carolyn Lanza
From: Matthews, Kathryn H <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 1:43 PM
To: Carolyn Lanza
Cc: Mann, Leigh
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Rosewood and Black Dirt Mitigation sites - USFWS comments
Attachments: Rosewood -USFWS Additional Project Information.pdf, Black Dirt -USFWS Additional
Project Information.pdf
Hi Carolyn,
Thanks very much for the additional information for these two projects. Based on the information provided,
indicating that there is no earth -moving proposed, and only planting of the stream and ditch buffers, the
Service would concur with a Not Likely to Adversely Affect determination for any aquatic species that may be
present in streams on the site or downstream.
In the future, you can either include whatever information you think would be helpful for us to understand the
project (mitigation plans, site maps), and/or you can include some extra information in the species conclusions
table. For example, in the "Notes/Documentation" column, you could indicate that no earth -moving is
proposed, or that the work involves only buffer planting. That would help justify your conclusions for species
on -site and downstream. If there is the potential for listed aquatic species on or very close to the site, the
more info you can provide us, the better.
The Service is very pleased to see these types of projects proposed in these watersheds. If you have any
questions while you are putting together Online Review Packages, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Please note that I am teleworking almost exclusively. Email is the best way to reach me. Thanks,
Kathy Matthews
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-856-4520, x. 27
From: Carolyn Lanza <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 11:07 AM
To: Matthews, Kathryn H <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Rosewood and Black Dirt Mitigation sites - USFWS comments
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
responding.

Hi Kathy,
Attached is additional projection information to Black Dirt and Rosewood in Wayne County. Please let me know if there
is anything else I can provide.
Sincerely,
Carolyn Lanza I Environmental Scientist
0: 919.851.9986 x113 M: 313.969.7318
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
From: Matthews, Kathryn H <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 8:04 AM
To: Carolyn Lanza <[e-mail]>
Subject: Rosewood and Black Dirt Mitigation sites - USFWS comments
Good morning,
Please find attached comment letters for these two projects. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Kirsten
asked me to talk about the two Little River projects by phone. Let me know if you want me to set up a
conference line for us to discuss them.
Thanks, Kathy
Please note that I am teleworking almost exclusively. Email is the best way to reach me. Thanks,
Kathy Matthews
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-856-4520, x. 27
z

WILDLANDS
E N G IN E E R I N G
January 27, 2021
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wayne County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect
to archaeological or cultural resources associated with a potential riparian buffer restoration project on the
Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel located in Wayne County, NC. A Site Map and a USGS Topographic Map showing
the approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the Northwest Goldsboro
7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle, and the site is located at latitude 35.406567 longitude-78.075854.
The Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel is being developed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation
in the Neuse River. The project includes the restoration and preservation of riparian buffers along four unnamed
tributaries and four ditches: UT to Charles Branch, UT1, UT2, UT3, and Ditch 1, 2, 3, and 4. There are few existing
trees on site, with UT to Charles Branch, UT1 and UT2 flowing through agricultural fields, while UT3 flows between
agricultural fields and residential lots. Ditch 1 and 3 have existing forested vegetation along one side, with
agricultural land on the other side. Ditches 2 and 4 have little to no riparian buffers and are bordered by open
agricultural land.
The major goals of the riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation bank project are to provide ecological and
water quality enhancements to the Neuse River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the site level.
This will be accomplished by restoring and or preserving the vegetative buffer on the areas up to 200 feet from
streams and ditches, along with permanently preserving and protecting the site through establishing a
conservation easement.
No surveyed sites listed on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) are located within a mile of
the site. In addition, the site is not located near any sites listed on the National Register with the SHPO. No other
architectural structures or archaeological artifacts have been observed or noted during preliminary surveys of the
site for restoration purposes. We ask that you review the site based on the attached information to determine the
presence of any historic properties within the conservation easement area proposed as shown on Figures 1 and 2.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any
questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
r
Carolyn Lanza, Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
313.969.7318
Attachments: Figure 1 Site Map and Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map
WildIan ds Engineering, Inc. (P) 704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

i
L. Ir ,1
1
Project Location
1 y
1
�•_—_ Proposed Conservation Easement
Utility Easement
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Non -Project Stream
Figure 1. Site Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
%��V E N G I N E E R I N G I J t Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

_ _ Proposed Conservation Easement
I
Re -
\IRA
rRL■ ' j
Northwest Goldsboro, USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
TRA4
Figure 2. USGS Topographic Map
VW ENGINEERING W I L N L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet Rosewood Mitigation Bank Parcel
N G I rat E E R I tV G I + + + I Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Wayne County, NC

6 � STAT£
r� Qunr-n •nog%'•
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
March 5, 2021
Carolyn Lanza clanzagwildlandseng com
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Rosewood mitigation bank, 35.406567,-78.075854, Wayne County, ER 21-0333
Dear Ms. Lanza:
Thank you for your letter of January 27, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(a�ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
�] State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Andrea Eckardt
From: Tammy Pfaff
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:40 AM
To: Andrea Eckardt; Robert Bugg
Subject: FW: Ronald & Paula Waters, Wayne County, NC
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Andrea and Robert,
Below is an email from the attorney regarding the CP&L easement rights.
Tammy Pfaff I Paralegal
0:704.332.7754 M:828.387.7404
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
From: Trey Taylor <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:34 AM
To: Tammy Pfaff <[e-mail]>
Subject: Ronald & Paula Waters, Wayne County, NC
Ta m my,
This email follows our telephone conference just now regarding the utility easement in favor of CP&L recorded in Book
533 at Page 495, Wayne County Registry encumbering Ronald & Paula Waters' property. Based upon my review of this
utility easement, I do not interpret the rights of the utility company to clear and maintain the right-of-way under the
overhead power lines to include the right to plug and stop up a ditch or negatively affect drainage on the property.
Let me know if you have further questions.
Trey
L. E. (Trey) Taylor III, Attorney at Law
Warren, Kerr, Walston, Taylor & Smith, L.L.P.
117 Ormond Avenue
Goldsboro, N. C. 27530
Telephone No. [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
1

Spring Hill
114-250 Braswell Rd
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Inquiry Number: 6187845.2s
September 11, 2020
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDR . Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
OrphanSummary---------------------------------------------------------
9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map
A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGRA
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6187845.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
114-250 BRASWELL RD
GOLDSBORO, NC 27530
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.4067080 - 35' 24' 24.14"
78.0754850 - 78' 4' 31.74"
Zone 17
765584.1
3921877.2
106 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
5947420 NORTHWEST GOLDSBORO, NC
2013
Portions of Photo from: 20140525, 20141018
Source: USDA
TC6187845.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
114-250 BRASWELL RD
GOLDSBORO, NC 27530
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
6187845.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
TC6187845.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
DEBRIS_______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6187845.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF_______________________
Solid Waste Facility Listing
SWRCY_______________________
Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI___________________________
Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9-----------
Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________
Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD___________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER _ _ _ _
_ _ _ PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
TC6187845.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
MINES MRDS-----------------
Mineral Resources Data System
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
6Y1117Y0DPU71ki[ej&iIII 11*15I&Wn1Ya7I&I
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6187845.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6187845.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 6187845.2S
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA a Hazardous Substance
Power transmission lines Disposal Sites
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
■ National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Spring Hill CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 114-250 Braswell Rd CONTACT: Carolyn Lanza
Goldsboro NC 27530 INQUIRY #: 6187845.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.406708 / 78.075485 DATE: September 11, 2020 8:54 am
Copyright �o 2020 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6187845.2S
NINA'S CHILD CtAR DIME
O
F
o�
e ° Ros w High
O�
p H LEEAGLES ALGA EMV
c�
z
aR°SeWO
P o °d Ro,
a b 9e
°n
n; e
i
R a b
rI
frappe s Wo d D
as
°a
p� Pa v e n R I d
9 e
e
Q.a 9 1 e s P° c
Braswell Rd
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
i
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/9 1/4 1/2 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Power transmission lines Disposal Sites
0 National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Spring Hill CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 114-250 Braswell Rd CONTACT: Carolyn Lanza
Goldsboro NC 27530 INQUIRY #: 6187845.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.406708 / 78.075485 DATE: September 11, 2020 8:55 am
Copyright �o 2020 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DEBRIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LCID 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC6187845.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF
0.500
SWRCY
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
0.001
US CDL
0.001
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
0.001
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
0.001
SPILLS
0.001
IMD
0.500
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
TC6187845.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
SPILLS 90
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
ECHO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MINES MRDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CCB
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC6187845.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database (Miles) Property
PCSRP 0.500
SEPT HAULERS 0.001
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000
EDR Hist Auto 0.125
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125
=1Q 7 7x0161T/=1 7=11ZrIG1V/=1 7kiIMtl=1ki11/n1YNah/�:
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS 0.001
RGA LF 0.001
RGA LUST 0.001
- Totals -- 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
Total
Plotted
0
0
0 0
0
0
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
TC6187845.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
• 10-A 19:9:10111 kl.]
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
TC6187845.2s Page 8

m
a