20211014 Ver 1_Individual_20210616

Division of ► bar Resources
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN % 20Help % 20File % 202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Craven
Is this a NCDMS Project*
0Yes ONo
Click Yes, only if katvS is the applicant cc co -applicant.
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0 Yes f No
This is any publicly funded by nunicipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:*
❑ Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
® Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?*
❑ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
❑ Regional General Permit (RGP)
® Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/individual permit process with the Corps. Please contact your Corps representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items that
are not provided in the E-PCN can be added to the miscellaneous upload area located at the bottom of this form.
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
0 Yes CS No
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:*
check all that apply
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
OYes No
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
® Riparian Buffer Authorization
0 Yes t1No
0Yes C3No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r so, attach the acceptance letter fromnitigation banks in -lieu fee program
0 Yes A No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and crop files hereto attach docurent
FILETYIEM.Sr BE AT
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
' Yes 0 No
li. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?*
0 Yes 0 No
0 Unknown

1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
O Yes CS No
Link to trout information: http://wvay.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jessica Guilianelli
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Id. Who is applying for the permit?*
▪ Owner
(Check all that apply)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
OYes 0No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:*
US Government
2b. Deed book and page no.:
336/0061
2c. Responsible party:
(fcr Corporations)
George W. Radford
2d. Address*
Street Address
Bldg 4223 Access Road
Address Line 2
MCAS Cherry Point
(7ly
Cherry Point
Postal / Lp Code
28533
2e. Telephone Number:*
( ) -
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
0ax)xxx-moc
• Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:*
Avolis Engineering, PA
4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
4c. Address*
Street Address
PO Box 15564
Address Line 2
aty
New Bern
Postal / Zip Code
28561
4d. Telephone Number:*
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
❑ Applicant (other than owner)
Stets / WdNince / Rsgbn
NC
Casty
USA
State / R'ovince / Region
NC
Couty
USA
4e. Fax Number:
(x)x)xcx-xwx
4f. Email Address:*
avoliseng ineering@emba rq ma Loom

Agent Authorization Letter*
Fie provide the Agent Authorization Letter if you are suhrritfig this doair¢rt.
Agent Authorization Unnecessary.pdf
RLETYFEMBr BEFL7F
377.36KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
la. Name of project:*
Install Living Shoreline
1b. Subdivision name:
(iF appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/town:*
Havelock
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
(tax RN or parcel D)
6-060-065
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point
Address Line 2
aty
Cherry Point
Postal / Zp Code
28533
2b. Property size:
(in acres)
11,014
State / Rwince / Region
NC
Oardry
USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude:* Longitude:*
34.947764 -76.886696
ex: 34.208504-77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Neuse River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
SB, Sw, NSW
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.*
030202040502 and 030202040504
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
This project covers two project areas. Each area is designated to receive shoreline stabilization through the implementation of Living Shoreline Techniques. A total of approximately
9,689 LF (7,590 - Tip Station Proper - Area 1; 2,099 LF - West of Navy Docks - Area 2) of shoreline will be stabilized in the project.
For each of these project areas, the waterward toe of the rock sills are proposed to be positioned approximately 30 feet waterward of the Normal Water Level (NWL). The rock sills will
be segmented and/or overlapped to facilitate flushing and cross -shore movement of marine life. Additionally, sandy fill will be installed landward of the rock sill up to an elevation that
corresponds to the Mean ligh Water. Appropriate coastal vegetation will be planted in the fill areas for the purpose of creating intertidal coastal marsh.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
0 Yes d No 0 Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)

Click the upload button or drag and drop files hereto attach document
USGS Map.pdf
Re type must be pdf
995.36KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Click the upload button cr drag and drop files hereto attach document
SOILS Map.pdf 1.09MB
Re type trust be pdf
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1,100
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(interndtent and perennial)
110,000
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the Proposed Action is to construct a living shoreline that will provide protection for USMC properties along the Neuse River, habitat for the many species that inhabit the
river, and water quality improvements. More detailed goals of this project are: to attenuate wave energy to reduce the rate of shoreline erosion on the Neuse River, thereby protecting
USMC assets that utilize that shoreline, increase resiliency of our shoreline by adding marsh grasses and restoring appropriate slopes that have been eroded, and enhance riparian
habitat, shallowwater habitat, and water quality in the Neuse River, which promotes recreational uses for our Marines, Sailors, and community neighbors.
The need for the Proposed Action is to enhance the resiliency and protect valuable shorelines, which include USMC assets that have been degraded due to erosion from coastal
storms. A living shoreline will protect the investments the USMC has made, while providing important ecological functions and water quality improvements.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project will construct a living shoreline parallel to the shoreline of the Neuse River at MCAS Cherry Point, from Slocum Creek on the west, to Hancock Creek on the east. The living
shoreline would consist of a granite sill constructed approximately 25-30 feet waterward of normal water level (NIL). This granite sill will be segmented to allow for flushing and cross -
shore movement of fish and wildlife. Oyster shell will be installed at the landward toe and the landward fringe will be back -filled and planted with marsh grasses.
Various types of equipment will be utilized to complete the project work including excavators, dump trucks, barges, cranes, and conventional hand tools. Land based equipment will
operate on upland areas only. No construction or equipment operation is proposed to occur on any adjacent wetland areas. Water -based equipment such as barges will be utilized
when water access is required to complete the work.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files hereto attach document
P2_Install Living Shoreline DWGS (Complete Set)_(5-7-21).pdf
Re type nest be pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
O Yes
Comments:
8.95MB
0 No O Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
0 Preliminary O Approved 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown O N/A
Corps AID Number:
Bkarrple: SAVJ-2017-99999
SAW 2012-00382
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Geo-Marine, Inc.
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR.
Approved jurisdictional determination signed by USACE on 12/18/2013.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files hereto attach document
AREA C JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION.pdf
AREA D JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION.pdf
Re type trot be RT
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
0 Yes 0 No
131.87KB
135.52KB
7b. If yes, explain.
The project construction will be conducted in two phases, which are shown in Figure 2-1 in the EA. Phase 1 will construct 9,689 linear feet of living shoreline and granite sill. Phase 2
would construct an additional 2,100 linear feet of living shoreline and granite sill.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This
includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.

A permit application for Phase 2 will be submitted separately.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams -tributaries
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
pi Buffers
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water
impacts below.
4a. Site #*(?)
1
4a1. Impact Reason
Shoreline Stab
4b. Impact type * (?)
P
4c. Name ofwaterbody(?)
Neuse River
4d. Activity type*
Stabilization
4e. Waterbodytype*
Estuary
4f. Impact
area*
6.81
(acres)
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
6.81
4g. Total open water impacts:
6.81
4h. Comments:
Areas of impact include footprint of rip rap sill and footprint of fill placed behind sill. 296,597 SF, 6.81 Acres. See Exhibits A, B and C.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts below.
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?*
Check all that apply.
▪ Neuse
❑ Catawba
❑ Goose Creek
❑ Other
❑ Tar -Pamlico
❑ Randleman
❑ Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type *(?)
6c. Per or Temp* (?)
6d. Stream name*
6e. Buffer mitigation required?*
6f. Zone 1 impact*
6g. Zone 2 impact*
Access along sand beach
T
Neuse River
No
297,117
(square feet)
0
(square feet)
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1
297,117.00
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
297,117.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
0.00
6i. Comments:
Buffer impact is associated with access to site for construction (rip rap sill construction, backfill and marsh plantings). See Exhibits A, B, and C
(Details). The buffer impact is calculated assuming a uniform 30-foot Zone 1 impact for the entire length of the project. Once the project is constructed
the sand beach will revegetate (naturally or planted) thereby providing a vegetated buffer where one does not currently e>dst.
Supporting Documentation - i.e. Impact Maps, Plan Sheet, etc.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files hereto attach docurent
Impact Map - Exhibit A - Area 1.pdf
Impact Map - Exhibit B - Area 2.pdf
Impact Map - Exhibit C - Details.pdf
Re mist be FIT
776.31 KB
596.96KB
3MB

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Mnimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
The project areas were limited to work in those areas where the repair and stabilization work is most critically needed.
The project design will not result in the impacts to any wetland areas.
Erosion control devices will be deployed to prevent erosion and sedimentation. Any disturbed areas will be re-established with vegetation in
accordance with the project Erosion Control Plan.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
The project will be completed by land -based and water -based equipment. The land -based equipment will only operate in upland areas. In no
circumstance will this equipment operate in wetland areas.
Erosion control devices will be deployed to prevent erosion and sedimentation. Any disturbed areas will be re-established with vegetation in
accordance with the project Erosion Control Plan.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
OYes 0No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The project elements are all designated in the Rules to be executable without mitigation.
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
OYes ONo
1b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection
program, include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM)s must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual. Associated supplement forms and other documentation shall be
provided.
What type of SCM are you providing?
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
p Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
(check al that apply)
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Diffuse Flow Documentation
Click the upload button or drag and drop files hereto attach docurrent
Re type rust be FCF
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
O Yes f No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?*
O Yes 0No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*

OYes ONo
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)?*
0Yes ONo
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPAfinal approval letter.)*
OYes 0No
Comments: *
Federal money will be expended. A Coastal Consistency Determination has been prepared for the project and will be submitted to the Division of
Coastal Management for concurrence. An environmental assessment has been prepared in compliance with NEPA. The environmental assessment
and signed Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) are attached below.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
OYes 0No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
OYes 0No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
OYes ONo0N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
OYes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
0Yes 0No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
0 Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
Yes No
f2, No O Unknown
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?*
0 Yes 0 No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
OYes 0No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-eg.usace.amry.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEBSLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?**
0 Yes 0 No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?*
OYes 0No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?*
For a full analysis of potential impacts to Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat, please refer to the attached Environmental Assessment,
Mich documents a thorough Analysis. Data from the MCAS Cherry Point Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) was utilized to
determine whether any Endangered Species east in the area. As described in the Environmental Assessment, it is unelected that the project will
have any impact on any protected species.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Click the upload button a drag and drop files hereto attach docurent
Re type nest be FCF
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
0Yes 0No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*

A 2007 report titled "Essential Fish Habitat Assessment and Study of the MCAS Cherry Point's Areas of Responsibility" was utilized for the EFH
Assessment, as well as the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper. It is unexpected that the project will have an effect on EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic
Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
OYes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
MCAS Cherry Point has developed an Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) (2018-2023) that details all historic or cultural
preservation.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files hereto attach document
Re must be FCF
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMAFloodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
O Yes
0 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMArequirements:
Shoreline stabilization methods designed to withstand wind and wave action.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Maps
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Click the irdoad button a drag and dnp files hereto attach docrrent
Marine Mammal Observer.pdf
Living Shoreline Signed FONSI.pdf
Living Shoreline EA FINAL.pdf
Re mist be FCFor ME
203.07KB
520.32KB
4.46MB
Signature
*
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
George W. Radford, Environmental Affairs Officer
Signature *
Date
6/10/2021

PROJECT AREA 1
ROOSEVELT BLVD
PROJECT
AREA 2
MM = Masontown mucky fine sandy loam and Muckalee sandy loam, frequently flooded
Se = Seabrook loamy sand
SuD = Suffolk loamy sand, 10 to 30 percent slopes
NoB = Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
NuB = Norfolk -Urban land complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes
w = Water
MAP DATA SOURCE:
USDA NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY
https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/
1

r
S
PROJECT AREA 1
R�
VER
�..SqiTkgTeRDktNrURF
(`'`'firer)
MAP DATA SOURCE:USGS DIGITAL 7.5' TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE MAP (2019 EDITION)

Agent Authorization Unnecessary
USMC Cherry Point is the applicant; therefore, an agent authorization is not
needed. Avolis Engineering, PA designed the project and provided the project
drawings.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW 2012-00382 County: Craven
U.S.G.S. Quad: Havelock
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point Agent:
Attn: Mr. George Radford
Address: PSC Box 8006 Building 4223 Access Rd.
MCAS Cherry Point, NC 28533
Geo-Marine, Inc.
Attn: Mr. David Moose
Address: 561 Country Club Road
Mount Olive, North Carolina 28365
919-223-0905
Property description: Area C. This section of MCAS Cherry Point is partially forested and partially developed.
Roosevelt Blvd. bisects Area C. Area C contains 321.8 acres of jurisdictional wetlands; 5.4 acres of isolated wetlands; 14.9
acres of jurisdictional waters; and 39,032 linear feet of stream channels.
Size (acres) 2041 Nearest Town Havelock
Nearest Waterway Slocum Creek River Basin Neusc
USGS HUC 03020204 Coordinates 34.929300 N-76.890403 W
Location description: MCAS Cherry Point is located in the City of Havelock between US Hwy. 70 and the Neuse
River. The specific project area (Area C) is located east of Slocum Creek and north of the runways as outlined in the
information package submitted in April 2013 by Geo-Maine, Inc .
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may
request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
X There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Ilarbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may he relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 12/18/2013. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1of2

There hare no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1.344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC. at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Wescott at910-251-4629.
C. Basis For Determination Section 10: Slocum Creek and Neuse River have marked navigation channels and
are subject to tidal influence. Section 404: Areas exhibit the three parameters specified in the regional
supplement to the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual. Features identified as Waters of the US exhibit an
OHWM.
D. Remarks
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room l 0M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it rneets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 2/15/2014.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
o�� lA1u t/
Date: 12/18/2013 Expiration Date: 12/18/2018
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http:!/pert.nwp.usace.army.mil!survev.html to
complete the survey online.

Applicant: MCAS Cherry Point —Area C
Attached is:
File Number: SAW 2012-00382
Date: 12/18/2013
See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
El
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
PERMIT DENIAL
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL, DETERMINATION
B
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
SECTION 1 - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an adrhinistrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/teg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive al]
rights to appeal the permit, including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the per nit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns. (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section it of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section I1 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive al] rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section I1 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS :TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
Ilowever, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record,
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: William Wescott
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
910-251-4629
RIGI IT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW 2012-00382 County: Craven U.S.G.S. Quad: Havelock
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point Agent:
Attn: Mr. George Radford
Address: PSC Box 8006 Building 4223 Access Rd.
MCAS Cherry Point, NC 28533
Geo-Marine, Inc.
Attn: Mr. David Moose
Address: 561 Country Club Road
Mount Olive, North Carolina 28365
919-223-0905
Property description: Area D. This section of MCAS Cherry Point is partially forested and partially developed. Area D
contains 411.06 acres of jurisdictional wetlands; 0.05 acres of isolated wetlands; 1.79 acres of jurisdictional waters; and
34,523 linear feet of stream channels.
Size (acres) 2350 Nearest Town Havelock
Nearest Waterway Hancock and Slocum Creeks River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020204 Coordinates 34.929631 N-76.866918 W
Location description: MCAS Cherry Point is located in the City of Havelock between US Hwy. 70 and the Neuse
River. The specific project area (Area D) consist of four sections as outlined in the information package submitted
October 21, 2013 by Gco-Mainc, Inc .
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To he considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may
request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
X There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law
or our puh]ished regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not he able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 12/18/2013. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 2

There arc no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 131 1). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Wescott at910-251-4629.
C. Basis For Determination Section 10: Hancock Creek, Slocum Creek and Neuse River have marked navigation
channels and are subject to tidal influence. Section 404: Areas exhibit the three parameters specified in the
regional supplement to the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual. Features identified as Waters of the US
exhibit an OHWM.
D. Remarks
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of ] 985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants. or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. if you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RI'A to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 2/15/2014.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA forin to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: 12/18/2013 Expiration Date: 12/18/2018
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http://pert.nwp.usace.army.mil/survev.html to
complete the survey online.

Applicant: MCAS Cherry Point --Area D
Attach rl iQt
File Number: SAW 2012-00382
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
PERMIT DENIAL
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Date: 12/18/2013
Sec Section below
13
C
D
F,
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.'
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns. (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
perinit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial ofa permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. 'Phis form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved .1D in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

F,: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting. and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
l lowever, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory' Division,
Attn: William Wescott
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street. Room 10M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
2407 West 51h Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
910-251-4629
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-880I
Phone: [phone]

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
Contact Name *
Contact Email Address*
Project Owner*
Project Name*
Project County*
Owner Address:*
William Wescott
[e-mail]
MCAS Cherry Point
Install Living Shoreline
Craven
Street Address
Bldg 4223 Access Road
Address Line 2
MCAS Cherry Point
City State / Bovine / Region
Cherry Point NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
28533 USA
Is this a transportation project?* C Yes 6' No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
fJ 401 Water Quality Certification - I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
fJ Individual Permit F Modification
fJ Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes 6* No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Chris Pullinger
Please give a brief project description below and include location information. *

The Proposed Action is for the construction of a living shoreline in the
Neuse River along the northern boundary of MCAS Cherry Point,
Havelock, North Carolina. The Proposed Action would install approx
9,689 linear feet of rock sill from Slocum Creek on the west end to
Hancock Creek on the east end. The area between the rock sill and
the shoreline will be filled and planted to establish an intertidal
coastal marsh.
The purpose of the Proposed Action is to construct a living shoreline
that will provide protection for USMC properties along the Neuse
River, habitat for aquatic species, and water quality improvements.
The need for the Proposed Action is to enhance the resiliency and
protect valuable shorelines, which include USMC assets that have
been degraded due to erosion from coastal storms. A living shoreline
will protect the investments the USMC has made, while providing
important ecological functions and water quality improvements.
A Scoping meeting for this project occurred July 27, 2020 with State
and Federal agencies.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature *
Submittal Date 5/12/2021

Wescott CIV William G II
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 11:07 AM
To: Wescott CIV William G II
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Pre -Filing Meeting Request Acknowledgement - Install Living
Shoreline - Ver
Attachments: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for Install
Living Shoreline that you submitted on 5/12/2021. Attached is a copy of your request.
All certification requests (applications) must include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was
submitted to the certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request.
The Division can not accept an application for your project earlier than 30 days from this pre -filing meeting
request. Applications that do not meet this 30-day requirement will be returned.
Please save this email/attachment; it must be submitted with your application to document that this requirement
has been met.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as
responses are not monitored.
1

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
NOr.;ci
Enriremmonfat QuaNry
Contact Name* William Wescott
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Owner* MCAS Cherry Point
Project Name* Install Living Shoreline
Project County* Craven
Owner Address: * Street Address
Bldg 4223 Access Road
Addre: s Line 2
MCAS Cherry Point
City Suite / Province / Region
Cherry Point NC
Pe tel ! Z p Code Country
28533 USA
Is this a transportation project?* Yes No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Individual Permit Modification
Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
Yes No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Chris Pullinger

Please give a brief project description below and include location information. *
The Proposed Action is for the construction of a living shoreline in the Neuse River along the northern boundary of MCAS
Cherry Point, Havelock, North Carolina. The Proposed Action would install approx. 9,689 linear feet of rock sill from Slocum
Creek on the west end to Hancock Creek on the east end. The area between the rock sill and the shoreline will be filled and
planted to establish an intertidal coastal marsh.
The purpose of the Proposed Action is to construct a living shoreline that will provide protection for USMC properties along
the Neuse River, habitat for aquatic species, and water quality improvements. The need for the Proposed Action is to
enhance the resiliency and protect valuable shorelines, which include USMC assets that have been degraded due to
erosion from coastal storms. A living shoreline will protect the investments the USMC has made, while providing important
ecological functions and water quality improvements.
A Scoping meeting for this project occurred July 27, 2020 with State and Federal agencies.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per.the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401
Certification Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting
location and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you
can submit an application.
Signature *
Submittal Date 5/12/2021

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
w
0
D � � BEGIN SILL CONSTRUCTION IMPACT AREA LEGEND D
SLOCUM CREEK
CLASS: SC;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-112
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27—(104)
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digitly signl�� iwi o hryK Avolis
cy,,
•,,,,,,,,
. .▪ ..
NEUSE RIVER s�,� r,
CLASS:SB;Sw,NSW ��� i
4 p . O'\,>`�•
C INDEX: 27—(104) 'y' a ��, C
~--GOLF COURSH-
c�
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
230,835 SQ. FT.
BULKHEAD 3495 -
BLDG 4843
NEW RIP -RAP SILL
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
WOODED ti
•
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
232,043 SQ. FT.
BULKHEAD 3494
END SILL CONSTRUCTION
WOODED ti
BULKHEAD
3493
g
1
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
N
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23484
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/5
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA
DRW MSP
C-K JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
U
0
z
O
U
z
w
w
z
z
w
w
J
u_
A Q�w A
zo z
AREA 1- SITE PLAN - IMPACT MAP
SCALE: 1 " = 250'
SUMMARY OF BUFFER IMPACTS
SITE
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
AREA 1 (EXHIBIT A)
0
232,043
0
0
AREA 2 (EXHIBIT B)
0
65,074
0
0
TOTAL IMPACTS:
0
297,117
0
0
SUMMARY OF OPEN WATER IMPACTS
SITE
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
OPEN WATER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
AREA 1 (EXHIBIT A)
230,835
0
AREA 2 (EXHIBIT B)
65,762
0
TOTAL IMPACTS:
296,597
0
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
vi
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
W
Q
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO..
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1
0
250' 500'
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
MEMENNEMEN
SCALE: 111 = 250'
SHEET 1 3
EXHIBIT A
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Fqp
«9
WOODED ti
BEGIN SILL CONSTRUCTION
WOODED ti
SUMMARY OF BUFFER IMPACTS
SITE
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
AREA 1 (EXHIBIT A)
0
232,043
0
0
AREA 2 (EXHIBIT B)
0
65,074
0
0
TOTAL IMPACTS:
0
297,117
0
0
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27—(104)
NEW RIP -RAP SILL
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
65,762 SQ. FT.
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
65,074 SQ. FT.
SUMMARY OF OPEN WATER IMPACTS
SITE
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
OPEN WATER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
AREA 1 (EXHIBIT A)
230,835
0
AREA 2 (EXHIBIT B)
65,762
0
TOTAL IMPACTS:
296,597
0
END SILL CONSTRUCTION
HANCOCK CREEK
CLASS: SC;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-115
AREA 2 - SITE PLAN - IMPACT MAP
SCALE: 1" = 150'
IMPACT AREA LEGEND
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
0
150'
300'
w
0
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digitlyti i ► iiiiFr o rLK Avolis
94,
_ S?
SEALr.
- ▪ 15738
GMT• , •
r�/y'V KI lA" `�k1
NRW
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/s
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO
DES JKA
PM/DM
DATE
DRW MSP
C-K JCA
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
OO
0
0
a
U.S. MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO..
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING N0.
SHEET 2
3
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SCALE: 1" = 150'
1
2
3
4
5
EXHIBIT B
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
a
Q
g
1
1
A
3
D
C
B
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
/ EXISTING TOP
�l OF BANK
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER J'
RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
RIP -RAP SILL
NOT TO SCALE
75' CAMA AEC
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER
RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
IMPACT AREA LEGEND
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
75' CAMA AEC
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE
RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER
MEAN WATER LINE
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PLAN VIEW
MEAN WATER LINE
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE
RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER
SECTION
CL RIP RAP SILL
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT
IMPACT AREA
REFLECTIVE MARKER POST
REFLECTIVE MARKER POST
TURBIDITY CURTAIN
CL RIP —RAP SILL
SILL PLANTING AND BACKFILL
SELECT BACKFILL
OPEN WATER PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
SUMMARY OF BUFFER IMPACTS
SITE
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
AREA 1 (EXHIBIT A)
0
232,043
0
0
AREA 2 (EXHIBIT B)
0
65,074
0
0
TOTAL IMPACTS:
0
297,117
0
0
REFLECTIVE MARKER POST
RIP RAP SILL
TURBIDITY CURTAIN
SUMMARY OF OPEN WATER IMPACTS
SITE
OPEN WATER
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
OPEN WATER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
(SQ. FT.)
AREA 1 (EXHIBIT A)
230,835
0
AREA 2 (EXHIBIT B)
65,762
0
TOTAL IMPACTS:
296,597
0
w
0
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digitly slgnig�I� Joh Avolis
t ri. OAK a�+rrf�
� ; • F.6�1p �iry
.1%1
SEAL g
. 15738
Q;• co
llf���ni iii tiiio-
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES MA DRW MSP CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
z
J
0
0
z
0
0
0
w
w
z
z
w
w
J
w
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
SCALE AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO —
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1
2
3
4
5
SHEET 3 OF
3
EXHIBIT C
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Environmental Assessment
For
Construct Living Shoreline
At
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point
April 2021

This page intentionally left blank.

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
Designation:
Title of Proposed Action:
Project Location:
Lead Agency for the EA:
Affected Region:
Action Proponent:
Point of Contact:
Date:
Abstract
Environmental Assessment
Construct Living Shoreline
MCAS Cherry Point, NC
United States Marine Corps
Craven County, NC
MCAS Cherry Point
Jessica Guilianelli
Natural Resources Manager
Environmental Affairs Department
MCAS Cherry Point
PSC 8006
Cherry Point, NC 28533
[e-mail]
April 2021
Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point has prepared this Environmental Assessment in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, as implemented by the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations and Navy regulations for implementing National
Environmental Policy Act. The Proposed Action would construct a living shoreline along MCAS
Cherry Point's Neuse River shoreline, thereby improving water quality, increasing installation
resilience, protecting existing infrastructure, and providing more diverse habitat. This
Environmental Assessment evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with the
preferred alternative and the No Action Alternative to the following resource areas: air quality,
water resources, geological resources, biological resources, infrastructure, transportation, and
public health and safety.
Abstract-i
Abstract

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
This page intentionally left blank.
Abstract-ii
Abstract

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 Proposed Action
The USMC seeks to construct a living shoreline in the Neuse River along the northern boundary
of MCAS Cherry Point, Havelock, NC. This living shoreline will improve water quality, create
valuable habitat and also promote resiliency by preventing erosion and mitigating flooding that
would damage the Marine Corps' vital infrastructure.
ES.2 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of the Proposed Action is to construct a living shoreline that will provide
protection for USMC properties along the Neuse River, habitat for the many species that inhabit
the river, and water quality improvements. More detailed goals of this project are:
• To attenuate wave energy to reduce the rate of shoreline erosion on the Neuse
River, thereby protection USMC assets that utilize that shoreline.
• Increase resiliency of our shoreline by adding marsh grasses and restoring
appropriate slopes that have been eroded.
• Enhance riparian habitat, shallow water habitat, and water quality in the Neuse
River, which promotes recreational uses for our Marines, Sailors, and community
neighbors.
The need for the Proposed Action is to enhance the resiliency and protect valuable shorelines,
which include USMC assets that have been degraded due to erosion from coastal storms. A
living shoreline will protect the investments the USMC has made, while providing important
ecological functions and water quality improvements.
ES.3 Alternatives Considered
Alternative 1, the preferred alternative, would construct a living shoreline parallel to the
shoreline of the Neuse River at MCAS Cherry Point, from Slocum Creek on the west, to Hancock
Creek on the east. The living shoreline would consist of a granite sill constructed approximately
25-30 feet waterward of normal water level (NWL). This granite sill will be segmented to allow
for flushing and cross -shore movement of fish and wildlife. Oyster shell will be installed at the
landward toe and the landward fringe will be back -filled and planted with marsh grasses. The
No Action Alternative will also be evaluated.
ES.4 Summary of Environmental Resources Evaluated in the EA
Council on Environmental Quality regulations, National Environmental Policy Act, and Navy
instructions for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, specify that an
Environmental Assessment (EA) should address those resource areas potentially subject to
impacts. In addition, the level of analysis should be commensurate with the anticipated level of
environmental impact.
ES-1
Executive Summary

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
The following resource areas have been addressed in this EA:
• Air Quality
• Water Resources
• Geological Resources
• Biological Resources
• Infrastructure
• Transportation, and
• Public Health and Safety.
ES.5 Summary of Potential Environmental Consequences of the Action Alternatives and
Major Mitigating Actions
Table ES-1 provides a tabular summary of the potential impacts to the resources associated
with each of the alternative actions analyzed.
ES.6 Public Involvement
Regulations from CEQ direct agencies to involve the public in preparing and implementing their
NEPA procedures. For this project, which will affect lands within the boundaries of the air
station and adjacent public trust waters, a scoping meeting was held on July 27, 2020 with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Environmental Quality, and all relevant
stakeholders. The Final EA will be published to the MCAS Cherry Point website. A notice of
availability will be published in the Havelock News, and comments will be accepted for a period
of 30 days.
ES-2
Executive Summary

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
Table ES-1 Summary of Potential Impacts to Resource Areas
Resource Area
No Action Alternative
Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative)
Air Quality
•
The No Action Alternative would have no
impacts to air quality.
•
The emissions associated with construction
would be temporary and localized.
Water Resources
•
Continued erosion and increased sediment
into surface waters
•
Reduce erosion and sediment inputs into the
Neuse River
•
Storm surge and flooding would continue to
•
Provide habitat diversity
threaten structures along the shoreline
•
Provide Flood Control
•
Erosion would impact wetlands
•
Provide protection of coastal zone and
shorelines
Geological Resources
•
Continued erosion and increased sediment
into surface waters
•
Provide protection of soils and reduction of
erosion to preserve land
Biological Resources
•
Continued erosion and increased sediment
into surface waters
•
Terrestrial vegetation — Re-establish functional
riparian buffer
•
Decreased water quality due to turbidity and
sediment loads
•
Terrestrial Wildlife — Improved access to Neuse
River and its resources
•
Continued lack of diverse habitat and
detrimental to marine wildlife
•
Marine Vegetation — Possibility to restore SAV
in the Neuse
•
Marine Wildlife — Increased diversity of habitat
•
Threatened and Endangered Species - no
impact.
Infrastructure
•
Continued erosion puts infrastructure at risk
•
Protection from erosion and flooding for
•
More frequent and costly maintenance and
critical infrastructure
repair to maintain status quo
•
Reduction in frequency and cost of
maintenance and repairs
ES-3
Executive Summary

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
Transportation
•
•
The No Action Alternative would not impact
transportation or traffic on station roads.
Increased sedimentation into the Neuse River
could cause shoaling and require increased
dredging to maintain navigation channels for
vessels.
•
•
No impacts to transportation or traffic on
station roads.
Granite sill would be marked so as not to
obstruct navigation in public trust waters.
Public Health and
•
Continued erosion and increased sediment
•
Reduced erosion and sediment into surface
Safety
into surface waters will continue to degrade
waters will improve water quality
water quality
•
Improve safety for residents living next to
•
Continued risk to residents living and
recreating in the area due to unsafe
bulkheads
shoreline or recreating in the area
ES-4
Executive Summary

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
Environmental Assessment for the
Construction of a Living Shoreline
at
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, Craven County
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS VII
ES.1 Proposed Action 1
ES.2 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action 1
ES.3 Alternatives Considered 1
ES.4 Summary of Environmental Resources Evaluated in the EA 1
ES.5 Summary of Potential Environmental Consequences of the Action Alternatives and Major
Mitigating Actions 2
ES.6 Public Involvement 2
1 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION 1-1
1.1 Introduction 1-1
1.2 Background 1-1
1.3 Location 1-1
1.4 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action 1-3
1.5 Scope of Environmental Analysis 1-3
1.6 Key Documents 1-3
1.7 Relevant Laws and Regulations 1-3
1.8 Public and Agency Participation and Intergovernmental Coordination 1-4
2 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES 2-1
2.1 Proposed Action 2-1
2.2 Alternatives Carried Forward for Analysis 2-3
2.2.1 No Action Alternative 2-3
2.2.2 Alternative 1— Construct Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative) 2-3
2.3 Alternatives Considered But Not Carried Forward for Analysis 2-5
3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 3-1
3.1 Air Quality 3-1
3.1.1 Regulatory Setting 3-1
3.1.2 Affected Environment 3-3
3.1.3 Environmental Consequences 3-3
3.2 Water Resources 3-4
3.2.1 Regulatory Setting 3-4
i
Table of Contents

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
3.2.2 Affected Environment 3-5
3.2.3 Environmental Consequences 3-9
3.3 Geological Resources 3-10
3.3.1 Affected Environment 3-11
3.3.2 Environmental Consequences 3-12
3.4 Biological Resources 3-12
3.4.1 Affected Environment 3-13
3.4.2 Environmental Consequences 3-19
3.5 Infrastructure 3-22
3.5.1 Affected Environment 3-22
3.5.2 Environmental Consequences 3-22
3.6 Transportation 3-23
3.6.1 Regulatory Setting 3-23
3.6.2 Affected Environment 3-24
3.6.3 Environmental Consequences 3-24
3.7 Public Health and Safety 3-24
3.8 Summary of Potential Impacts to Resources and Impact Avoidance and Minimization 3-25
4 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 4-1
4.1 Definition of Cumulative Impacts 4-1
4.2 Scope of Cumulative Impacts Analysis 4-2
4.3 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions 4-2
4.3.1 Past Actions 4-2
4.3.2 Present and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions 4-3
4.4 Cumulative Impact Analysis 4-4
4.4.1 Air Quality 4-4
4.4.2 Water Resources 4-5
4.4.3 Geological Resources 4-5
4.4.4 Biological Resources 4-5
4.4.5 Infrastructure 4-6
4.4.6 Public Health and Safety 4-6
5 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED BY NEPA 5-1
ii
Table of Contents

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
5.1 Consistency with Other Federal, State, and Local Laws, Plans, Policies, and Regulations 5-1
5.2 Irreversible or Irretrievable Commitments of Resources 5-2
5.3 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 5-3
5.4 Relationship between Short -Term Use of the Environment and Long -Term Productivity 5-3
6 REFERENCES 6-1
7 LIST OF PREPARERS 7-1
List of Figures
Figure 1-1 Location Map 1-2
Figure 2-1 Project Location 2-1
Figure 2-2 Bulkhead and Shoreline Condition Segments 1-2
Figure 2-3 Cross -Section of Proposed Living Shoreline 1-23
Figure 2-4 Shoreline photo displaying escarpment and fallen vegetation 1-24
Figure 3-1 Digital photography comparison to determine erosion 3-8
Figure 3-2 Mapped Soils in the vicinity of the shoreline 3-12
Figure 3-3 Estuarine and marine submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) located in the vicinity
of the MCAS Cherry Point. 3-15
Figure 3-4 Exerpt of NOAA Nautical Chart #11552 along MCAS Cherry Point shoreline 3-23
List of Tables
Table 2-1 Bulkhead and Shoreline Condition Assessment 2-2
Table 3-1 Craven County Air Emissions Inventory 3-3
Table 3-2 Primary Surface Water Classifications near MCAS Cherry Point 3-5
Table 3-3 Shoreline and Bulkhead Condition Observations 3-6
Table 3-4 Recession of Land Surface by Shoreline Segment 3-9
Table 3-5 Threatened and Endangered Species Potentially Occuring 3-17
Table 3-6 Summary of potential impacts to Resources 3-27
Table 5-1 Principal Federal and State Laws Applicable to the Proposed Action 5-1
Appendices
Appendix A— Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Appendix B — Coastal Consistency Determination
iii
Table of Contents

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
iv
Table of Contents

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
1 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action
1.1 Introduction
Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point proposes to construct a living shoreline along its
northern boundary, which is adjacent to the Neuse River in Craven County, NC. Due to
significant erosion caused by Hurricane Florence in 2018, the shoreline is deteriorating rapidly,
putting structures and water quality at risk. Repairs are being completed to stabilize existing
bulkheads. In order to further protect those repairs, a living shoreline is being proposed. The
living shoreline will reduce wave action before it reaches the shoreline, will provide habitat, and
water quality improvements to the Neuse River.
The United States Marine Corps (USMC) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as implemented by the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations and Navy regulations for implementing NEPA.
1.2 Background
The USMC seeks to construct a living shoreline in the Neuse River along the northern boundary
at MCAS Cherry Point, Havelock, NC. This living shoreline will improve water quality, create
valuable habitat, prevent erosion and mitigate flooding that would damage Cherry Point's vital
infrastructure.
The shoreline is comprised of segments of hardened structures (bulkhead) bounded by
segments of natural shorelines. Currently, several locations along the northern boundary of
MCAS Cherry Point are experiencing significant erosion at the terminus of each bulkhead as
well as severe undercutting of the bulkhead structure itself. As a result of this erosion, the
adjacent natural shoreline is seeing significant erosion and large amounts of fill are being lost
behind the bulkhead. The stabilization of these shorelines is a priority for Cherry Point, based
on the potential degradation of water quality in the Neuse River and mission impacts due to the
failing bulkheads. Current conditions have created unsafe conditions for landward and
shoreline related training and recreational activities. Unchecked erosion will ultimately cause
shoreline stabilization systems to fail, increasing safety risks and further soil loss into the Neuse
River. This harms military readiness and degrades water quality.
Complete removal of the bulkheads is not an option due to the structures they currently
support. Cherry Point plans to repair bulkheads in place and construct a living shoreline parallel
to the Neuse River shoreline to protect existing structures and to reestablish a natural shoreline
in the area. The ultimate goal is to construct a sill along the length of Neuse Shoreline. Phase 1
of this project will construct approximately 9,000 linear feet of shoreline. Phase 2 will
construct an additional 2,100 linear feet.
1.3 Location
MCAS Cherry Point is located on approximately 13,164 acres in Craven County, in the City of
Havelock, North Carolina. (Figure 1-1).
1-1
Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
>11
River Bend
•
Jones
Onslcnw
lSwa nshara
Trent Woods
t Bridgeton
'Neve Bern `ems
latroiply
� � a
Craver
Peletler
70�
Neuse Forest 'so
•L
Grantshoro
•
MCAS Cherry Point
L�f
- Havelock. - ,.
Beaufort _ -- -- -
Alliance
BOhara
Pamlico
Arapahoe
•
Mlnnesott
Va d merre 6
"s�`#i Florence ▪ �r `
Stonewall-L.
Newport Carteret 1r
tar
Oriental
Merriman A' i
MCALF Bogue,-"'—Morehead,A r Eeaufort;
OAK
` Emerald Isle Indian Beath Atlanti- c
Atlantic Ocean
MCAS Cherry Point • CityiTown
Major Road
Other Road
County Boundary
USMC Installation
Source: E3RI 2018. USMC 2018
Alk J 7 d
NORTH OP4ks
PAarylf
• i-WBSr 1—
iAr¢�ra� Vrginia
North
-� Carolina
South Ny
Georgia
Florida
Delaware
Figure 1-1 Location Map
1-2
Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
1.4 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of the Proposed Action is to construct a living shoreline that will provide
protection for USMC properties along the Neuse River, habitat for the many species that inhabit
the river, and water quality improvements. More detailed goals of this project are:
• To attenuate wave energy to reduce the rate of shoreline erosion on the Neuse
River, thereby protection USMC assets that utilize that shoreline.
• Increase resiliency of our shoreline by adding marsh grasses and restoring
appropriate slopes that have been eroded.
• Enhance riparian habitat, shallow water habitat, and water quality in the Neuse
River, which promotes recreational uses for our Marines, Sailors, and community
neighbors.
The need for the Proposed Action is to enhance the resiliency and protect valuable shorelines,
which include USMC assets that have been degraded due to erosion from coastal storms. A
living shoreline will protect the investments the USMC has made, while providing important
ecological functions and water quality improvements.
1.5 Scope of Environmental Analysis
This EA includes an analysis of potential environmental impacts associated with the action
alternative and the No Action Alternative. The environmental resources initially evaluated in
this EA include: air quality, water resources, geological resources, cultural resources, biological
resources, land use, visual resources, airspace, noise, hazardous materials and waste,
socioeconomics, and environmental justice. Due to the type of project and potential impacts,
the EA will only analyze air quality, water resources, geological resources, biological resources,
infrastructure, transportation, and public health and safety.
1.6 Key Documents
Key documents are sources of information incorporated into this EA. Documents are considered
to be key because of similar actions, analyses, or impacts that may apply to this Proposed
Action. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) guidance encourages incorporating documents
by reference. Documents incorporated by reference in part or in whole include:
• MCAS Cherry Point Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan, 2012
• MCAS Cherry Point Shoreline Erosion and Living Shoreline Stabilization Study, 2019
• MCAS Cherry Point Assessment of the Commercial and Recreational Uses of the Waters
Surrounding MCAS Cherry Point and the BTs, 2009
1.7 Relevant Laws and Regulations
The USMC has prepared this EA based upon federal and state laws, statutes, regulations, and
policies pertinent to the implementation of the Proposed Action, including the following:
1-3
Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
• NEPA (42 U.S.C. sections 4321-4370h)
• CEQ Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508)
• Department of Navy (DoN) Regulations for implementing NEPA (32 CFR 775)
• MCO 5090.2, Volume 12, Environmental Planning and Review
• Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. section 7401 et seq.)
• Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. section 1251 et seq.)
• Rivers and Harbors Act (33 U.S.C. section 407)
• Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S.C. section 1451 et seq.)
• Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. section 1531 et seq.)
• Marine Mammal Protection Act (16 U.S.C. section 1361 et seq.)
• Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. section 703-712)
• Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. section 668-668d)
• EO 11988, Floodplain Management
• EO 13693, Planning for Federal Sustainability in the Next Decade
• Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act
A description of the Proposed Action's consistency with these laws, policies and regulations, as
well as the names of regulatory agencies responsible for their implementation, is presented in
Chapter 5 (Table 5-1).
1.8 Public and Agency Participation and Intergovernmental Coordination
Regulations from CEQ direct agencies to involve the public in preparing and implementing their
NEPA procedures. For this project, which will affect lands within the boundaries of the air
station and adjacent public trust waters, a scoping meeting was held on July 27, 2020 with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Environmental Quality, and all relevant
stakeholders. The Final EA will be published to the MCAS Cherry Point website. A notice of
availability will be published in the Havelock News, and comments will be accepted for a period
of 30 days.
1-4
Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
2 Proposed Action and Alternatives
2.1 Proposed Action
The USMC seeks to construct a living shoreline in the Neuse River along the northern boundary
of MCAS Cherry Point, Havelock, NC. This living shoreline will improve water quality, create
valuable habitat and also promote resiliency by preventing erosion and mitigating flooding that
would damage the Marine Corps' vital infrastructure.
The project area consists of both hardened and natural, unprotected shorelines. There are
approximately 5,500-feet of bulkhead structures along eight distinct segments that protect
waterfront property along the Neuse River shoreline. None of the structures are contiguous
(i.e., there are varying lengths of unarmored shoreline between each segment). Most of the
bulkheads are in direct contact with the water during the majority of the normal tidal
fluctuations, while several bulkheads are in contact with the water only occasionally — during
storms or other high tidal events. The bulkheads appear to have been constructed at about the
same time period and consist of steel sheet pile sections with a tieback system. The steel
sections are coated with an epoxy. The steel sheet piles are generally 22 or 27 pounds per foot
such as the old U.S Steel PZ22 or PZ27 type. An 18"x18" concrete cap typically connects and
encases the top of sheet piles. The bulkheads generally retain between nine to 17 feet of soil.
The retained soil grade is about four to six inches below the concrete cap. Starting from the
bulkhead, the soil slopes up to the protected structures in a range of angles between
approximately 5 to 25 degrees. The distance of the bulkhead to any building structure varies
from about 50 to 100 feet. In addition to these bulkheads are segments of sporadically placed
rock and/or broken concrete revetments. Bulkhead structures comprise approximately 5,500
linear feet of the shoreline, which is approximately 35-percent of the project area.
The unprotected shorelines are predominantly a mixture of mature trees, forested wetlands,
marsh grass, and bare sediments. The shoreline segments vary in length from only 150 feet to
approximately 3,000 feet and generally maintain a gradual nearshore slope. The shorelines also
contain visual indicators of erosion such as escarpments, undercut banks, and fallen trees. The
natural shoreline areas comprise approximately 10,500 linear feet of the project area.
The Neuse River and Estuary is a shallow waterbody with an average depth of 3.6 m (11.8 feet)
and a width of 6.5 km (9.2 miles). Nautical charts depict water depths of 0.5 to 3 feet along the
Cherry Point shoreline. The tide range is low, so the predominant water currents in the system
are wind -driven. There is a NOAA gage located at the Marine Corps Air Station at 10 m (32.8
feet) above the ground. These data show predominant average hourly wind direction at Cherry
Point varies throughout the year. For approximately half of the year (from September through
March), the wind is from the north, which is blowing toward the Cherry Point shoreline. There
is sufficient width in the Neuse River estuary to establish wind waves that interact with the
shoreline. These wind waves can cause severe coastal erosion.
2-1
Proposed Action and Alternatives

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
The project construction will be conducted in two phases, which are shown in Figure 2-1. Phase
1 will construct approximately 9,700 linear feet of living shoreline and granite sill. Phase 2
would construct an additional 2,100 linear feet.
Figure 2-1 Project Location
In 2017, a study was conducted to assess the structural integrity of each bulkhead as well as the
natural shoreline segments shown in Figure 2-2. Table 2-1 summarizes the findings of that
study.
Figure 2-2 Bulkhead and Shoreline condition segments
2-2
Proposed Action and Alternatives

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
Table 2-1 Bulkhead condition assessment
Bulkhead Number
Condition
3495
Poor
3494
Poor
3493 & 3492
Poor/Serious
3491
Poor
3490
Fair
3489
Fair
3488
Fair
Navy Boat Docks
Fair
2.2 Alternatives Carried Forward for Analysis
2.2.1 No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, a living shoreline would not be constructed. Bulkhead repairs
would continue as planned, but no additional protection would be established for those
bulkheads. The No Action Alternative would not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed
Action; however, as required by NEPA, the No Action Alternative is carried forward for analysis
in this EA. The No Action Alternative will be used to analyze the consequences of not
undertaking the Proposed Action, not simply conclude no impact, and will serve to establish a
comparative baseline for analysis.
2.2.2 Alternative 1— Construct Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative)
Alternative 1, the preferred alternative, would construct a living shoreline parallel to the
shoreline of the Neuse River at MCAS Cherry Point, from Slocum Creek on the west, to Hancock
Creek on the east. The living shoreline would consist of a granite sill constructed approximately
25-30 feet waterward of normal water level (NWL). This granite sill will be segmented to allow
for flushing and cross -shore movement of fish and wildlife. Oyster shell will be installed at the
landward toe and the landward fringe will be back -filled and planted with marsh grasses.
2-3
Proposed Action and Alternatives

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
ElS1ING T0P
OF SANK
Figure 2-3 Cross -Section of proposed Living Shoreline
ER19TLhC TCE- I VAR ES -SEE PLAN
OF RIM
1 O'
v, �!'vvvri Pam_
v999vvv7v9999
°' 7 ' OYSTER SHELLS" 9
Ui""LER • y r a wr er v o
OF NOTCH TO TOP CF
FL_ E1E1'ATION
Q +IP R6P SLL
FOP OF SILL - +G 7E;
MEAN HIGH WATETi EI00011JN = tG.t5'
-"TOP OF FILL ELE 0T1OA = +0.26
k[rt•::H E1E.411CN = Ear
ULAN LOW 00.1LP_tI.L ATF = -011.
-- O0TTOW ELEVATION = 'ORES ••`TEE PL?7+
Phase 1 of the preferred alternative would permanently transform approximately 4.5 acres of bare sand
shallow water habitat into an intertidal coastal marsh vegetated with smooth cordgrass (Spartina
alterniflora). In addition, Phase 1 of the preferred alternative would permanently transform
approximately 3.0 acres of existing zone 1 riparian buffer from an eroding bare sandy beach into coastal
wetlands vegetated with saltmeadow cordgrass (Spartina patens).
Phase 2 of the preferred alternative would permanently transform approximately 2.0 acres of bare sand
shallow water habitat in front of existing bulkheads into an intertidal coastal marsh vegetated with
smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora).
The overall project would provide approximately 6.5 acres of intertidal coastal marsh, vegetate
approximately 3.6 acres of zone 1 riparian buffer and install approximately 12,000 linear feet (3.3 acres)
of rock sill which provides aquatic habitat and a hard substrate for oyster colonization. While this seems
to be a large quantity, the current condition of the shoreline and the riparian buffer is not ideal. Very
little if any vegetation is currently located within the riparian buffer due to the erosion that has occurred
(See Figure 2-4).
Figure 2-4 Shoreline photo displaying escarpment and fallen vegetation
2-4
Proposed Action and Alternatives

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
The preferred alternative would permanently impact a total of approximately 10 acres of open
water. Again, this quantity seems to be substantial, however, this segment of the Neuse River
is over 3 miles wide. The proposed action would reduce open water habitat in this location by
0.13%. While this could be seen as a loss of a specific type of habitat, the habitat diversity will
be greatly increased by introducing marsh habitat where it doesn't currently exist as well as
rocky habitat from the granite sill, which would greatly increase the diversity of substrate that is
currently available.
2.3 Alternatives Considered But Not Carried Forward for Analysis
The following alternatives were considered, but not carried forward for detailed analysis in this
EA, as they did not meet the purpose and need for the project.
Bulkhead Expansion — In order to prevent future erosion and loss of property, a bulkhead
would be driven the length of the Neuse River shoreline and backfilled. This additional 9,200
linear feet of hardened structure would reduce erosion, but would eliminate habitat and access
for recreational users. This alternative would impact several natural stream channels that exist
along the length of the shoreline, forcing them to be piped at their outlet to the Neuse River.
This alternative would not meet the purpose and need of the action.
Construct Rock Sill but eliminate backfill and planting —To minimize loss of shallow water
habitat, one alternative considered, but eliminated from future analysis is the construction of
the granite sill without the proposed backfill and planting of the shoreline. Over time,
sediments suspended within the Neuse River would naturally backfill the shoreline. This
natural backfilling process could take several years before enough fill has accumulated to
commence with planting. This gradual process would leave unprotected sediments that would
be more susceptible to eroding than those that are held together with the roots of plantings. It
would not meet the purpose and need of the action.
Riprap Revetment —To minimize loss of further fill, riprap revetments could be placed along
the entire shoreline, including the toe of each bulkhead. This alternative would eliminate
shallow water habitat and reduce access for recreational users, as well as impacting several
natural stream channel outfalls. This alternative would not meet the purpose and need of the
action.
2-5
Proposed Action and Alternatives

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
This chapter presents a description of the environmental resources and baseline conditions that
could be affected from implementing any of the alternatives and an analysis of the potential
direct and indirect effects of each alternative.
All potentially relevant environmental resource areas were initially considered for analysis in
this Environmental Assessment (EA). In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), and Department of Navy guidelines; the
discussion of the affected environment (i.e., existing conditions) focuses only on those resource
areas potentially subject to impacts. Additionally, the level of detail used in describing a
resource is commensurate with the anticipated level of potential environmental impact.
The potential impacts to the following resource areas are considered to be negligible or non-
existent so they were not analyzed in detail in this EA:
Airspace: The Proposed Action does not alter, use, or have the potential to affect airspace at
the installation.
Hazardous Materials and Wastes: The proposed action would not introduce any hazardous
materials into the environment. Any wastes generated by construction would be disposed of
under the existing Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) —compliant water
management programs and MCAS Cherry Point Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs).
Cultural Resources: No impacts to cultural resources would be expected.
Socioeconomics: No impacts to socioeconomics would be expected.
Environmental Justice: No impacts to socioeconomics and environmental justice would be
expected.
3.1 Air Quality
Air quality in a given location is defined by the concentration of various pollutants in the
atmosphere. A region's air quality is influenced by many factors, including the type and amount
of pollutants emitted into the atmosphere, the size and topography of the air basin, and the
prevailing meteorological conditions.
Most air pollutants originate from human -made sources, including mobile sources (e.g., cars,
trucks, buses) and stationary sources (e.g., factories, refineries, power plants), as well as indoor
sources (e.g., some building materials and cleaning solvents). Air pollutants are also released
from natural sources such as volcanic eruptions and forest fires.
3.1.1 Regulatory Setting
3.1.1.1 Criteria Pollutants and National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has
established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (40 CFR part 50) for these
3-1
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
pollutants. NAAQS are classified as primary or secondary. Primary standards protect against
adverse health effects; secondary standards protect against welfare effects, such as damage to
farm crops and vegetation and damage to buildings. Some pollutants have long-term and short-
term standards. Short-term standards are designed to protect against acute, or short-term,
health effects, while long-term standards were established to protect against chronic health
effects.
Areas that are and have historically been in compliance with the NAAQS are designated as
attainment areas. Areas that violate a federal air quality standard are designated as
nonattainment areas. Areas that have transitioned from nonattainment to attainment are
designated as maintenance areas and are required to adhere to maintenance plans to ensure
continued attainment.
3.1.1.2 Mobile Sources
Emissions from mobile sources are called Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSATs). MSATs are
compounds emitted from highway vehicles and non -road equipment that are known or
suspected to cause cancer or other serious health and environmental effects. In 2001, USEPA
issued its first MSAT Rule, which identified 201 compounds as being Hazardous Air Pollutants
(HAPs) that require regulation. A subset of six of the MSAT compounds was identified as having
the greatest influence on health and included benzene, butadiene, formaldehyde, acrolein,
acetaldehyde, and diesel particulate matter. More recently, USEPA issued a second MSAT Rule
in February 2007, which generally supported the findings in the first rule and provided
additional recommendations of compounds having the greatest impact on health. The rule also
identified several engine emission certification standards that must be implemented (40 CFR
parts 59, 80, 85, and 86; Federal Register Volume 72, No. 37, pp. 8427-8570, 2007). Unlike the
criteria pollutants, there are no NAAQS for benzene and other HAPs. The primary control
methodologies for these pollutants for mobile sources involves reducing their content in fuel
and altering the engine operating characteristics to reduce the volume of pollutant generated
during combustion.
3.1.1.3 Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)
GHGs are gas emissions that trap heat in the atmosphere. These emissions occur from natural
processes and human activities. Scientific evidence indicates a trend of increasing global
temperature over the past century due to an increase in GHG emissions from human activities.
The climate change associated with this global warming is predicted to produce negative
economic and social consequences across the globe.
In an effort to reduce energy consumption, reduce GHGs, reduce dependence on petroleum,
and increase the use of renewable energy resources, the Navy has implemented a number of
renewable energy projects. The Navy has established Fiscal Year 2020 GHG emissions reduction
targets of 34 percent from a FY 2008 baseline for direct GHG emissions and 13.5 percent for
indirect emissions. Examples of Navy -wide GHG reduction projects include energy efficient
construction, thermal and photovoltaic solar systems, geothermal power plants, and the
3-2
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
generation of electricity with wind energy. The Navy continues to promote and install new
renewable energy projects.
3.1.2 Affected Environment
The most recent emissions inventory for Craven County is shown in Table 3.1-1. Volatile organic
compound (VOC) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions are used to represent ozone generation
because they are precursors of ozone.
Table 3-1. Craven County Air Emissions Inventory (2014)
Location
VOC
(tpy)
CO
(tpy)
NOx
(tpy)
SO2
(tpy)
PMio
(tpy)
PM2.5
(tpy)
Craven County
24,700
31,869
3,193
1,134
3,472
1,866
Source: USEPA 2019.
Legend: tpy = tons per year; NOx= nitrogen oxide; VOC = Volatile Organic Compound; CO = Carbon Monoxide; SO2=sulfur
dioxide; PMlo= particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter; PM2.5= particulate matter less than or equal
to 2.5 microns in diameter.
3.1.3 Environmental Consequences
Effects on air quality are based on estimated direct and indirect emissions associated with the
action alternatives. The region of influence (ROI) for assessing air quality impacts is the air basin
in which the project is located, Craven County, North Carolina.
3.1.3.1 No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Action would not occur and there would be no
change to baseline air quality. Therefore, no significant impacts to air quality or air resources
would occur with implementation of the No Action Alternative.
3.1.3.2 Construction of Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative) Potential Impacts
The construction of the living shoreline could generate small, localized air quality impacts due
to the heavy equipment required. This would be intermittent, for a period of months, and
would not be significant. Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would contribute
directly to emissions of GHGs from the combustion of fossil fuels. Construction activities would
generate a limited amount of emissions and would not likely contribute to global warming to
any discernible extent.
Therefore, implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not result in significant
impacts to air quality.
3-3
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
3.2 Water Resources
MCAS Cherry Point is located within the Neuse River Basin. The air station is bounded on the
north by the Neuse River, and to the east and west by Hancock and Slocum Creeks. There are
approximately 1,234 acres of wetlands on the air station, covering around 11% of the land area.
A total of 168 acres of the station is classified as emergent wetland. This herbaceous
community is most common along the edges of the Neuse River, Slocum Creek, and Hancock
Creek. Important components of this resilient community include big cordgrass (Spartina
cynosuroides), black needlerush (Juncus roemerianus), Jamacia swamp sawgrass (Cladium
mariscus ssp. Jamaicense), and broadleaf cattail (Typha lot -Iloilo).
3.2.1 Regulatory Setting
The Clean Water Act (CWA) establishes federal limits, through the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) program, on the amounts of specific pollutants that can be
discharged into surface waters to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological
integrity of the water. The NPDES program regulates the discharge of point (i.e., end of pipe)
and nonpoint sources (i.e., storm water) of water pollution. Waters of the United States are
defined as (1) traditional navigable waters, (2) wetlands adjacent to navigable waters, (3) non -
navigable tributaries of traditional navigable waters that are relatively permanent where the
tributaries typically flow perennially or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months), and (4) wetlands that directly abut such tributaries under Section 404 of the CWA, as
amended, and are regulated by USEPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Section 404 of the CWA authorizes the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of
Engineers, to issue permits for the discharge of dredge or fill into wetlands and other Waters of
the United States. Any discharge of dredge or fill into Waters of the United States requires a
permit from the USACE.
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act provides for USACE permit requirements for any in -
water construction. USACE and some states require a permit for any in -water construction.
Permits are required for construction of piers, wharfs, bulkheads, pilings, marinas, docks,
ramps, floats, moorings, and like structures; construction of wires and cables over the water,
and pipes, cables, or tunnels under Section 404 of the CWA authorizes the Secretary of the
Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to issue permits for the discharge of dredge or fill
into wetlands and other Waters of the United States. Any discharge of dredge or fill into Waters
of the United States requires a permit from the USACE.
The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA) provides assistance to states, in
cooperation with federal and local agencies, for developing land and water use programs in
coastal zones. Section 307 of the CZMA stipulates that where a federal project initiates
reasonably foreseeable effects to any coastal use or resource (land or water use, or natural
resource), the action must be consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the
3-4
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
enforceable policies of the affected state's federally approved coastal management plan. The
Division of Coastal Management is the lead agency for coastal management and is responsible
for enforcing the State's federally approved coastal management plan.
3.2.2 Affected Environment
3.2.2.1 Surface Water
Surface water includes all lakes, ponds, rivers, streams, and impoundments within a defined
area or watershed. MCAS Cherry Point is located within the Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020204).
The Neuse River bounds the station to the north, and two streams create the eastern and
western boundaries of the station, Slocum and Hancock Creeks. Slocum Creek is located on the
west side of the station and flows north into the Neuse River; Hancock Creek bounds MCAS
Cherry Point to the east and then flows north into the Neuse River (MCAS Cherry Point 2012).
The surface water classification of the Neuse River at the proposed project location is SB; Sw,
NSW. Slocum Creek and Hancock Creek both have surface water classifications of SC; Sw, NSW
(DWR Surface Water Classification Map).
Table 3-2 Primary Surface Water Classifications near MCAS Cherry Point
Class SB
Tidal salt waters protected for all SC uses in addition to primary recreation. Primary
recreational activities include swimming, skin diving, water skiing, and similar uses
involving human body contact with water where such activities take place in an
organized manner or on a frequent basis.
Class SC
All tidal salt waters protected for secondary recreation such as fishing, boating, and
other activities involving minimal skin contact; fish and noncommercial shellfish
consumption; aquatic life propagation and survival; and wildlife.
Swamp Water (Sw)
Supplemental classification intended to recognize those waters which have low
velocities and other natural characteristics which are different from adjacent streams.
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Supplemental classification intended for waters needing additional nutrient
management due to being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic
vegetation.
3-5
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
During the 2017 shoreline study, the Neuse River immediately adjacent to each bulkhead and
natural shoreline was evaluated. Table 3-3 summarizes these observations.
Table 3-3 Shoreline and Bulkhead Condition Observations
Shoreline Segment
Approximate Length
(ft)
Nearshore Water
Depths *
1
1,000
Shallow
2
2,250
Shallow
Bulkhead 3495
900
Shallow
3
1,750
Shallow
Bulkhead 3494
530
Shallow
4
1,400
Shallow
Bulkhead 3493/92
1500
Shallow
5
375
Shallow
Bulkhead 3491
300
Shallow
6
315
Shallow
Bulkhead 3490
430
Moderate
7
150
Shallow
Bulkhead 3489
400
Moderate
8
530
Shallow
Bulkhead 3488
800
Shallow
9
2,800
Shallow
Navy Boat Docks
650
Not measured
*Shallow = less than -3ft; Moderate = less than -5ft. Depths approximated using metal rod.
3.2.2.2 Stormwater
Stormwater at MCAS Cherry Point is managed through the Air Station's Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan. The purpose of the plan is to identify and map potential pollutant sources that
may be expected to contribute to contamination of stormwater discharges from permitted
outfall drainage areas and to provide an overview of the regulatory requirements and
recommendations for control of stormwater runoff from the station into onsite or adjacent
streams and other water bodies. MCAS Cherry Point also has an Integrated Contingency Plan
that includes control measures and action to take in the event of a discharge that could impact
surface waters. The Station's Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Rule provide
3-6
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
requirements for oil spill prevention, preparedness, and response to avoid oil spills to navigable
waters (MCAS Cherry Point 2012).
Stormwater management at MCAS Cherry Point is implemented through an integrated system
of BMPs, both structural and non-structural. Structural BMPs reduce, remove, and/or prevent
pollutants from entering the stormwater system. These measures include absorbent booms,
sluice gates used for spill control, oil/water separators, catch basins, retention/detention
basins, and grassy swales. Non-structural BMPs include policies and procedures that reduce the
amount of pollutant inputs into the environment by managing the source of the pollutants or
minimizing exposure to stormwater through source reduction, pollution prevention, education,
and land use management. lithe Proposed Action is implemented, an Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan would be necessary. The Environmental Affairs Department and the
Stormwater Program Manager are responsible for ensuring that personnel at all levels are
trained in accordance with the goals of the Erosion and Sedimentation Control and Stormwater
Programs (MCAS Cherry Point 2012).
3.2.2.3 Wetlands
There are approximately 1,234 acres of wetlands within the boundaries of MCAS Cherry Point.
There are approximately 734 acres of forested wetlands on the station, the majority of which
are located in the riparian zones of the major streams and their tributaries. Blackwater swamps
occur within the inland floodplains of the tributary streams. The main canopy of the forested
wetlands includes swamp tupelo (Nyssa bifloral), baldcypress (Taxodium distichum), red maple
(Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and a variety of oaks (Quercus spp.); the
mid -canopy is dominated by American hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana). There are
approximately 168 acres of emergent wetland on the station, which is found along the edges of
the Neuse River, Slocum Creek, Hancock Creek, and their larger tributaries. These emergent
wetlands contain big cordgrass (Spartina cynosuroides), black needlerush (Juncus roemerianus),
Jamaica swamp sawgrass (Cladium mariscus spp. Jamaicense), and broadleaf cattail (Typha
lot -Iloilo). The remaining wetlands on the station are small amounts of unconsolidated bottom
and scrub -shrub wetland; there are also approximately 335 acres of wetlands where the
specific type has yet to be determined (MCAS Cherry Point 2012).
In the natural shoreline areas between bulkheads, exist natural stream channels bounded by
wetlands.
3.2.2.4 Coastal Zone and Shorelines
The coastal zone is the interface between land and water and is vital to the resiliency and well-
being of our country. It supports half of the nation's population and supports ecologically
important habitat and natural resources.
3-7
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
At Cherry Point, many functions are located on our shorelines, including housing, recreation,
and military training. The interface between installation property and the Neuse River is
critical. The current shoreline has been eroded and damaged through many years of storms
and their associated storm surge. Sections of the shoreline that had been protected with
bulkheads are seeing massive losses of earthen fill and the associated vegetation. Sediment
inputs into the river from this erosion contribute to the overall water quality degradation in the
Neuse River.
In 2017 a study was conducted that evaluated erosion rates on the Neuse River shoreline over
the period from 1994 to 2017. Erosion rates were calculated in front of bulkheads as well as on
natural shorelines. Results of this study are shown in Table 3-3 below. The natural,
unprotected shorelines located along the MCAS Cherry Point shoreline are severely eroded
with shoreline recession rates of up to -5 ft/yr. Figure 3-2 shows a section of shoreline that
was evaluated. For maps depicting erosion since 1994 for the entire proposed project area,
refer to Appendix B.
Figure 3-1 Digital photography comparison to determine erosion
LEGEND
1994 Shoreline
2005 Shoreline
2017 Shoreline
Bulkhead [2017 bigihzed LXCatiOril
SCALE
100ft
3-8
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
Table 3-4 Recession of land surface by Shoreline Segment
Shoreline Segment
Maximum Shoreline
Recession (ft)
1994-2017
1
65
2
25
Bulkhead 3495
35
3
40
Bulkhead 3494
20
4
30
Bulkhead 3493/92
35
5
35
Bulkhead 3491
0*
6
25
Bulkhead 3490
0*
7
0
Bulkhead 3489
0*
8
50
Bulkhead 3488
50
9
85
*These bulkheads did not support a waterward beach in 1994. The mean low water line exists
at the bulkhead.
Shoreline segment 9 warrants specific details regarding the overall land surface and sediment
lost. Segment 9 is approximately 2,800 linear feet in length. With a maximum recession of 85
feet over the length of the shoreline, a substantial amount of fill has been lost. This loss of land
affects an important operational facility, the Navy Boat Docks Compound, located at the mouth
of Hancock Creek.
3.2.3 Environmental Consequences
In this EA, the analysis of water resources evaluates the potential impacts on surface waters,
wetlands, the coastal zone, and shorelines.
3-9
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
3.2.3.1 No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Action would not occur and there would be no
change to baseline water resources. No stabilization of the shoreline would occur, so continued
erosion and the resulting increased sedimentation into the Neuse River would continue to
impact water quality. Storm surge and flooding would continue, unimpeded, further
threatening structures along the shoreline. Erosion would continue to impact wetlands and the
overall resiliency of the installation.
3.2.3.2 Construct Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative) Potential Impacts
The preferred action would construct a granite sill and living shoreline, which would protect the
shoreline from continued erosion. Reducing erosion would reduce sediment impacts into the
Neuse River, which would improve water quality. Short term impacts from construction could
result in increased turbidity for a brief period of time, however, these impacts would cease
once construction is complete.
The preferred alternative will impact approximately 10 acres of open water habitat, however,
this habitat will be replaced with more diverse and higher quality habitat such as intertidal
coastal marsh. The sill itself will provide a varied aquatic habitat that does not currently exist
in this portion of the Neuse River. Oyster shells placed along the landward toe of the rock sill
could accelerate the colonization of a viable oyster resource, which would provide additional
water quality improvements.
A living shoreline would provide flood control and improve the overall resiliency of the
installation. The granite sill would reduce water velocities and reduce the height of wave action
against the shoreline. This reduction in the force of water, along with the restored marsh grass
habitat immediately behind the sill, will reduce potential for flooding, as the marsh will
"absorb" the storm surge and prevent it from reaching the upland surfaces in most storms.
No freshwater wetlands will be impacted by the preferred action. However, the preferred
action will assist in preventing the continued erosion of estuarine wetlands and adverse
impacts associated with storm events.
The Coastal Zone and shorelines will be protected by the granite sill and marsh planting. A
positive impact is expected.
Therefore, implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not result in significant
impacts to water resources. Positive impacts are anticipated.
3.3 Geological Resources
Geological features of the region include the low-lying coastal plain which extends inland to the
Suffolk scarp, which is defined by alluvial and estuarine valleys and adjacent terraces (Ator et al.
2005). The Suffolk scarp forms the boundary between the Outer and Inner Coastal Plain, and
identifies an ancient shoreline that formed during the late Pleistocene Epoch, more than 10,000
years ago. Quaternary sedimentary rocks define the soils, which are primarily comprised of
3-10
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
undivided surficial deposits of sand, clay and gravel (North Carolina Geological Survey 1991).
The North Atlantic Coastal Plain section of the Outer Coastal Plain Mixed Forest Province is
further defined as having a flat terrain, with a weakly dissected alluvial plain. Soils in this
section formed in a thick layer of recent marine shale and sand deposits (USDA 2005).
3.3.1 Affected Environment
3.3.1.1 Topography and Soils
The topography of the Main Station is almost uniformly flat and poorly drained. Elevation
ranges from near sea level along the shores of the Neuse River, Slocum Creek, and Hancock
Creek, to 51 ft above MSL north of the airfield. Elevations of terraces located between stream
systems are approximately 25-33 ft above MSL (USMC 2001). Land surface of the Main Station
is part of the Talbot Terrace Plain formed of unconsolidated marine sediment deposits. These
sediments were deposited and reshaped during several cycles of coastal emergence and
submergence from the Cretaceous Period to present. Broad, flat terraces between major
stream valleys characterize the land surface. Terraces slope rather abruptly to stream and
tributary valleys, tending to be steeply sloped near outlets and more shallowly sloped inland.
There are 27 different soil series mapped on the Main Station, a majority which are hydric
(69%) and associated with broad interstream divides and ridges of marine terraces (Table 2.1)
(USDA NRCS 2009). The following seven soil series comprise 67% of Main Station soils: Norfolk
loamy fine sand, 2-6% slopes, Rains fine sandy loam, Goldsboro loamy fine sand, 0-2% slopes,
Urban land, Suffolk loamy sand, 10-30% slopes, Bragg soils, 0-8% slopes, and Autryville loamy
sand, 0-6% slopes.
Soils of the Main Station range from well drained soils to very poorly drained soils. Areas of low
relief contain soils that have low water retention capacity, with well drained soils generally
associated with slopes of streams and rivers. Major well drained soils series of the Main Station
include Norfolk loamy fine sand (2-6% slopes), Suffolk loamy sand (10-30% slopes), Bragg soils
(0-8% slopes), Autryville loamy sand (0-6% slopes), and Norfolk —Urban land complex (0-6%
slopes). Soils associated with broad interstream terraces are loamy sands or sandy loams,
including Rains fine sandy loam, Lynchburg fine sandy loam, Norfolk —Urban land complex (0-6%
slopes), Goldsboro —Urban land complex (0-2% slopes), Norfolk loamy fine sand (0-2% slopes),
and Onslow loamy sand. Masontown mucky fine sandy loam and Muckalee sandy loam,
frequently flooded, is associated with floodplain areas of the Main Station. Approximately 75%
of soils classified as Urban land are covered by asphalt and buildings (USMC 2001).
Soils in the immediate vicinity of the proposed action include Goldsboro loamy fine sand,
Seabrook loamy sand, Suffolk loamy sand, Norfolk loamy fine sand, and Masontown mucky fine
sandy loam.
3-11
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
Figure 3-2 Mapped Soils in the vicinity of the shoreline
3.3.2 Environmental Consequences
3.3.2.1 No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Action would not occur and there would be no
means to stabilize shorelines. Erosion would continue and soils would continue to be lost. This
would result in a negative impact to geology and soils.
3.3.2.2 Construct Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative) Potential Impacts
The preferred alternative will stabilize shorelines, increase resiliency, and prevent future
erosion.
Therefore, implementation of this alternative would not result in significant impacts to
geological resources.
3.4 Biological Resources
Biological resources include living, native, or naturalized plant and animal species and the
habitats within which they occur. Plant associations are referred to generally as vegetation, and
animal species are referred to generally as wildlife. Habitat can be defined as the resources and
conditions present in an area that support a plant or animal.
Within this EA, biological resources are divided into five major categories: (1) terrestrial
vegetation, (2) terrestrial wildlife, (3) marine vegetation, (4) marine wildlife, and (5) Threatened
and Endangered Species.
3-12
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
3.4.1 Affected Environment
3.4.1.1 Terrestrial Vegetation
Terrestrial vegetation along the Neuse River shoreline consists of a mixture of mature trees,
forested wetlands, marsh grass, and stretches of non -vegetated sediments due to erosion.
Species currently present include baldcypress, pine (Pinus spp.), black willow (Salix nigra),
eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), waxmyrtle
(Myrica cerifera), salt hay grass (Spartina patens), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), and smooth
cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora).
Riparian buffers act as a filter, removing pollutants and sediment from stormwater runoff.
North Carolina Department of Environment Quality — Division of Water Resources in
conjunction with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, set out the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules
specifically to protect existing riparian buffers to reduce nutrient loading after multiple fish kills
from toxins in the sounds. This rule applies to activities affecting vegetation within a 50-foot
wide riparian buffer directly adjacent to surface waters in the Neuse River Basin, including
intermittent streams, perennial streams, lakes, ponds, reservoirs, and estuaries. Proper
management of the vegetation within riparian buffers is essential to the success and health of
the ecosystem and resiliency of the community. Conditions for the living shoreline are dynamic
within the riparian buffer. Desirable vegetation includes naturally occurring species of trees
and various marsh grasses.
3.4.1.2 Terrestrial Wildlife
Common mammal species at MCAS Cherry Point include white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus), black bear (Ursus americanus), bobcat (Lynx rufus), gray fox (Urocyon
cinereoargenteus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), swamp rabbit
(Sylvilagus aquaticus), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus
carolinensis), fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), and many small rodents and shrews. Bird species that
are widespread include wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), northern bobwhite (Colinus
virginianus), and the mourning dove (Zenaida macroura).
Resident and migratory waterfowl are also common. Ibis (subfamily Threskiornithinae),
cormorants (family Phalacrocoracidae), herons and egrets (family Ardeidae), and belted
kingfisher (Ceryle alcyon) are common throughout flooded areas. Common songbirds include
red -eyed vireo (Vireo olivaceus), cardinal (family Cardinalidae), tufted titmouse (Baeolophus
bicolor), ruby -throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris), eastern towhee (Pipilo
erythrophthalmus), wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), summer tanager (Piranga rubra), blue -
gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina), and Carolina wren
(Thryothorus ludovicianus). Common herpetofauna include box turtle (Terrapene spp.),
common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus
adamanteus), timber rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus), and American alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis).
3-13
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
3.4.1.3 Marine Vegetation
Marine vegetation includes plants occurring in marine or estuarine waters. These may include
mangroves, algae, and various grasses. The Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act provides for the conservation and management of the fisheries. Under the
Act, essential fish habitat (EFH) consists of the waters and substrate needed by fish to spawn,
breed, feed, or grow to maturity.
MCAS Cherry Point is located on the southern shore of the Neuse River and bounded on either
side by Hancock and Slocum Creeks. Water depths are shallow. No Submerged Aquatic
Vegetation (SAV) has been mapped in the vicinity of MCAS Cherry Point. This is likely due to the
frequent high wave energies focused in those shallow water habitats. However, seagrasses
have been identified in the upper reaches of Hancock and Cahooque Creek (MCAS 2009).
3-14
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
Figure 3-3 Estuarine and marine submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) located in the vicinity of the
MCAS Cherry Point.
34°58'0"N-
7ircker
('reek
34°56'0'
34°54'0°N-
76°54'0"W
Ander'Soll
('reek
76°52'0"W
Neuse River
Cahoogue
Creek
SAV - (field survey) 0 Military Installation
O Study Area Boundary
County
Craven
County
76°50'0"W
0 0.25 0.5
CI Kilometers
Miles
0 0.25 0.5
34°58'0°N
34°56'0"N
34°54'0"N
3-15
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
3.4.1.4 Marine Wildlife
Marine Mammals
Jurisdiction over marine mammals is maintained by NOAA Fisheries and the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS). All marine mammals are protected under the provisions of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The MMPA prohibits any person or vessel from
"taking" marine mammals in the United States without authorization. The MMPA defines
"take" to mean "to harass, hunt, capture, or kill or attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or kill any
marine mammal." The common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) is known to inhabit the
Neuse River in the vicinity of MCAS Cherry Point.
The primary species of marine mammal that utilizes the Neuse River is the common bottlenose
dolphin. While dolphin do utilize shallow waters, in the location of the preferred alternative,
most waters are 3 feet or shallower, which is not preferred foraging habitat for these mammals.
Fish
The Neuse River supports abundant and varied fresh and brackish water sport fisheries
(NCWILDLIFE.org). Recreational and Commercial fishermen utilize the Neuse River. According
to a study performed on MCAS Cherry point, these fishermen primarily sought trout (Cynoscion
spp.), red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), and southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma), along
with the occasional striped bass (Morone saxatilis), bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix), and Atlantic
croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) in the more brackish portions of the creeks, while black
crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus), sunfish (Centrarchus spp.), and largemouth bass
(Micropterus salmoides) were sought in the fresher upper reaches (DoN 2009). The variety of
fish present in the Neuse are largely due to seasonal salinity concentrations that are dependent
on freshwater input and the wind tides the Neuse experiences in this area. Waterways around
MCAS Cherry Point are jointly managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
and the North Carolina Department of Marine Fisheries.
Benthic Invertebrates
Animals that live on the sea floor are called benthos. Most of these animals lack a backbone
and are called invertebrates. Typical benthic invertebrates found in the Neuse River include
oysters, blue crab, and shrimp. Shrimp and blue crab are an important fishery in the Neuse
River near Cherry Point. Oysters are abundant further downstream, however, they are not
currently present in large numbers in this portion of the Neuse River. It is unclear when the
populations declined or why those populations no longer exist.
Through a partnership with Duke University, we are evaluating the feasibility of reintroduction
of the oyster as the rock sill being proposed would serve as ideal habitat for this filter feeding
bivalve. The re -introduction of this fishery that once thrived in this area, would be a great
benefit to the Neuse River ecosystem.
3-16
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
3.4.1.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
There are seven threatened and endangered species that have the potential to occur on MCAS
Cherry Point. Those species are listed in Table 3-5 below.
Table 3-5 Threatened and Endangered Species and Species Potentially Occurring
at MCAS Cherry Point
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal
Listing
Status
State
Listing
Status
Critical
Habitat
Present?
Plants
Roughleaf loosestrife
Lysimachia asperulifolia
E
E
No
Sensitive joint -vetch
Aeschynomene virginica
T
E
No
Birds
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
E
No
Roseate tern
Sterna dougallii
E
E
No
Fish
Shortnose sturgeon
Acipenser brevirostrum
E
E
No
Herpetofauna
American Alligator
Alligator mississippiensis
T (SAT)
T
No
Marine Mammals
West Indian Manatee
Trichechus manatus
E
-
No
Selections for Listing Status Column include: E = endangered, T = threatened, SAT =
Listed due to similarity of appearance to threatened species (These species are not
biologically threatened or endangered and are not subject to ESA section 7
consultation.).
Roughleaf Loosestrife
Roughleaf loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulifolia) is a federal and North Carolina endangered
species that could potentially occur at the air station. Roughleaf loosestrife is endemic to North
and South Carolina coastal plain and sandhi!! habitats (USFWS 1994). It occurs within ecotones
located between longleaf pine and uplands, and pond pine pocosins on moist to seasonally
saturated sands, and on shallow organic soils overlaying sand (USMC 2009a).
3-17
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
Sensitive joint -vetch
Sensitive (Virginia) joint -vetch (Aeschynomene virginica) is a federally threatened species and a
North Carolina endangered species that occurs in intertidal zone areas that are flooded twice
daily. This species could potentially occur at the air station due to the presence of suitable
habitat; however surveys for this species have not identified it.
Red Cockaded Woodpecker
RCW is a federally endangered and North Carolina endangered species that historically
occurred in longleaf pine forests of MCAS Cherry Point. This species has not been observed at
MCAS Cherry Point since the 1970's (USMC 2001). In 1980, an abandoned colony was identified
in the Ordnance Area of the Main Station, and in 1982 some evidence of recent RCW activity
("start" holes on a mature pine tree) were discovered; however no representatives were
observed, and no further activity or evidence of this species occurring at the Main Station has
been identified since 1982 (Rogers 1999). Subsequent surveys have not identified this species,
or provided indications of their presence in suitable cavity trees.
Due to the presence of an established colony of RCW at Croatan National Forest, located
approximately within 3 miles of suitable longleaf pine habitat at the Main Station, there is a
potential for RCW to occur, however, it is unlikely that RCW would establish in forested land
adjacent to the Neuse River.
Roseate Tern
The roseate tern breeds primarily on small offshore islands, islets, rocks, and cays; rarely do
they breed on large islands. They typically nest near vegetation or jagged rock, close to the
waterline on narrow ledges of emerging rocks, on open sandy beaches, or among coral rubble.
Habitat for roseate terns exists in the adjacent Carteret County; however, the species has not
been observed in the county for more than 20 years (USMC 2009d). No known habitat for the
Roseate Tern exists at MCAS Cherry Point.
Shortnose Sturgeon
(Acipenser brevirostrum) is a federal and North Carolina endangered species that has the
potential to occur in offshore waters of the Main Station, Piney Island, OLF Atlantic, Pamlico
Point, Maw Point, and Cat Island. However, presence of this species in these waters has not
been documented. Former and current distribution of shortnose sturgeon is uncertain
(Hightower 2001) and in North Carolina, current populations are thought to be restricted to the
Cape Fear River and Albemarle Sound (NMFS 2002). No reports of this species are associated
with the Neuse River.
3-18
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
American Alligator
The federally and State threatened American alligator occurs at the Main Station (Table 4.1)
(LeBlond et al. 1994). Although this species is considered fully recovered, it is listed as
threatened due to similarity in appearance with the federally endangered American crocodile.
No critical habitat rules have been published by USFWS for American alligator (USFWS 2021).
The Main Station supports a breeding population of American alligator, with a range of alligator
sizes (post-hatchling to adult) commonly observed in the Hancock and Slocum creek areas, with
nests observed in Jack's Branch (LeBlond et al. 1994, USMC 2001).
West Indian Manatee
This West Indian manatee includes two distinct subspecies, Florida manatee (Trichechus
manatus latirostris) and Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus); however the two
subspecies share similar physical characteristics, and are distinguished based on their range
(USFWS 2021). Range of Florida manatees is primarily restricted to the southeastern U.S.,
although they are occasionally observed as far north as Massachusetts, and as far west as
Texas. Antillean manatees are found in coastal and riverine systems of South and Central
America (from Brazil to Mexico), and in the Greater and Lesser Antilles throughout the
Caribbean Basin. West Indian manatee inhabits both marine and freshwater habitats, with a
preference for warm water. They are herbivores, feeding on a variety of marine, estuarine, and
freshwater plants, including submerged, floating and emergent vegetation. Manatees are rarely
seen in the Neuse River, however their presence is possible.
3.4.2 Environmental Consequences
3.4.2.1 No Action Alternative
Under the No -Action Alternative, the Proposed Action would not occur and the shoreline would
remain vulnerable to continued shoreline erosion. If shoreline erosion were to continue at its
current rate, the result would be negative impacts to biological resources.
Terrestrial Vegetation
The No Action Alternative will not stabilize the shoreline, therefore continued erosion will occur
and resiliency will be decreased. Terrestrial vegetation will be severely impacted by that
erosion. Shoreline trees will be eliminated as the soils below them are swept away by storm
waters. Forested areas will become un-vegetated, barren beaches.
Terrestrial Wildlife
With no stabilization activities to protect shoreline vegetation, habitat available for terrestrial
wildlife will be reduced. For most species, they will migrate inland and utilize other habitats
3-19
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
available to them on Cherry Point. For those species that utilize the Neuse River, access will be
greatly restricted due the escarpments and steep bluffs.
Marine Vegetation
As there has been no marine vegetation observed in the vicinity of the project area, the No
Action Alternative would not impact marine vegetation.
Marine Wildlife
With continued shoreline erosion and increased sediment load in the Neuse River, marine
wildlife will be detrimentally impacted by increased sediment loads and turbidity. Diversity will
continue to be impacted as no suitable habitat would exist for many species.
Threatened and Endangered Species and Species at Risk
With no stabilization activities to protect shoreline vegetation and habitat available for
threatened and endangered flora and fauna. For most species, they will migrate inland and
utilize other habitats available to them on Cherry Point. For those species that utilize the Neuse
River, access will be greatly restricted due the escarpments and steep bluffs.
3.4.2.2 Construct Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative) Potential Impacts
Terrestrial Vegetation
All work will minimize any impacts to vegetation and will re-establish vegetation in those areas
that erosion has eliminated the riparian buffer. This will be a positive impact and increase the
resiliency of the shoreline.
Terrestrial Wildlife
The proposed alternative will repair severe erosion that has caused large scarps along the
length of the Neuse River shoreline. Any improvements to this erosion will have a great benefit
to terrestrial wildlife, as they will now have access restored to the Neuse River and the
resources it provides.
Marine Vegetation
As there has been no marine vegetation observed in the vicinity of the project area, the No
Action Alternative would not impact marine vegetation. Altering the wave energies in the
shallow waters of the Neuse River by installing the granite sill could encourage the
establishment of SAV beds along the shoreline. This would be a positive impact of the
Preferred Alternative.
Marine Wildlife
The preferred action will have a minimal impact on wildlife species during construction. Any
wildlife species that may occupy the project site would likely be temporarily displaced. There
are ample adjacent areas in which to feed or take cover during construction.
3-20
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
Once construction has been completed, the preferred action should have a positive effect on
local wildlife by reducing shoreline erosion and increasing habitat diversity.
While backfill of the living shoreline in advance of the planting of marsh grasses may displace
some wildlife, including invertebrates that utilize the sandy bottom, it is not expected that this
habitat loss would be a significant impact. Overall, the project will increase habitat and habitat
diversity, which will benefit the Neuse River wildlife communities as a whole.
Due to the depths of water in which the work is taking place (quantify the depth at which the
sill will be installed), it is unlikely that the installation will have any impact on marine mammals
that may be in the Neuse River. If marine mammals are observed during construction, work will
cease until the individuals have left the area. No formal consultation would be required.
Threatened and Endangered Species
Roughleaf Loosestrife
The preferred alternative is not expected to impact this species, as it has not been identified in
the project area.
Sensitive joint -vetch
The preferred alternative is not expected to impact this species, as it has not been identified in
the project area.
Red Cockaded Woodpecker
The preferred alternative is not expected to impact this species, as it has not been identified in
the project area.
Roseate Tern
The preferred alternative is not expected to impact this species, as it has not been identified in
the project area.
Shortnose Sturgeon
The preferred alternative is not expected to impact this species, as it has not been identified in
the project area.
American Alligator
Due to construction activities and timing, it is unlikely that any alligator would be present
during construction. If an alligator is observed, construction will cease until the individual has
left the area.
3-21
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
West Indian Manatee
Due to the depths of water in which the work is taking place (less than 3 feet of water), and the
rare occurrence of manatees in the Neuse River, it is unlikely that the construction of the
preferred alternative will have any impact on manatees. If a manatee is observed during
construction, work will cease until the individuals have left the area.
There would be no significant impact on threatened and endangered species and no formal
consultation between the U.S. Navy and USFWS or NOAA Fisheries would be required.
Therefore, implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not result in significant
impacts to biological resources.
3.5 Infrastructure
The project area encompasses eight (8) areas that are currently protected by bulkheads. These
bulkheads total approximately 5,500 linear feet of the shoreline. Most of this linear footage is
in direct contact with the water during normal tidal fluctuations. Most are composted of steel
sheet pile sections with a tieback system and concrete cap. In recent storm events, severe
erosion has occurred at each bulkhead terminus, as they are segmented along the shoreline.
This erosion has scoured out backfill, removed native vegetation, and has generally de-
stabilized the structures. Due to the large amount of fill behind these bulkheads which support
numerous base functions, it is not feasible to remove the bulkheads. Repairs to these
bulkheads are being made, however, additional protection by way of a living shoreline is being
proposed.
3.5.1 Affected Environment
3.5.1.1 Facilities/Real property
Several facilities exist on fill that is currently supported by bulkheads. These structures are
important sectors of the installation, including housing, recreation, and Marine Corps
Community Services.
3.5.2 Environmental Consequences
3.5.2.1 No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Action would not occur and there would be no
additional protection for the bulkheads that are currently in place. High water events and
storms would continue to occur and erosion at the terminus of each bulkhead would continue.
This erosion would ultimately lead to the shorelines and bulkheads becoming de -stabilized and
requiring additional major repairs.
3.5.2.2 Construct Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative) Potential Impacts
Under the preferred alternative, the living shoreline would serve as protection to the
bulkheaded shoreline by slowing down water velocities and reducing stress on the shoreline.
3-22
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
This would result in less maintenance costs and reduce the threat to infrastructure from storms
and erosion. The living shoreline would increase the resiliency of the shoreline. Therefore,
implementation of this action alternative would not result in significant impacts to
infrastructure.
3.6 Transportation
The Neuse River is a large navigable water that supports commercial and recreational fisheries
and recreational users in vessels of varying sizes.
3.6.1 Regulatory Setting
The proposed living shoreline will be constructed within public trust waters, which are open to
boating and recreational uses. 33 CFR 334.430 restricts access within 500 feet of the shoreline,
as a security measure. The living shoreline will fall within that restricted area, which will serve
as a means of protection for the sill. As the Neuse River is a navigable water, lighting will be
present in order to provide safe transportation for vessels during the nighttime hours.
Figure 3-4 Excerpt of NOAA Nautical Chart #11552 along MCAS Cherry Point Shoreline
3
11
4 ,g 1,3
11
2
10
%ti 2i 12 '2
$ PYIngS 12
12
TANK
12
12 so
12
11
;'---- so
R i 5l. 9 10 11 11
11
i■ ic: : 1 11
•�A' 1 Dusk bind9 A� *Piles PA o 6 .---, 11
Ike �.► , REsrRlc�r a-ra,�� 6 �, )
, 3 see note Aj 8 i
G '1' -r- 7- T r j -r- g� 10 11
11
� 1 -�
� 4,1 1-
'� w
2�' C1'A" ; 10
1 °ems I`,,
h " 9
PAJ \. Y
iii 4Li
FIR 4s 15ft 4M "6° 1Ur5 ! ,
t--"1: .1511.;°A
t f "l �n 1V / f T ' ti �Ro �r ' PAs
PilA 1a l •S 1
23
2PA -(
12
Pi
11
a
Cy
3-23
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
3.6.2 Affected Environment
The Neuse River is a large navigable water that supports commercial and recreational fisheries
and recreational users in vessels of varying sizes. The river is considered Public Trust Waters
and is generally open to the public, with some exceptions. In the location of the project, water
depths are around 3 feet, so only smaller vessels (kayaks, flat-bottomed skiffs) frequently utilize
the area.
3.6.3 Environmental Consequences
3.6.3.1 No Action Alternative Potential Impacts
Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Action would not occur and there would be no
change to transportation. With continued erosion and the resultant sedimentation within
waterways, there is the potential for shoaling and the need for future dredging downstream of
MCAS Cherry Point. Due to the overall size of the Neuse River, this is likely not a significant
impact.
3.6.3.2 Construct Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative) Potential Impacts
The Neuse River is relatively shallow in the location where the living shoreline will be installed.
Any vessel traffic in that area consists of fishermen, crabbers, and recreational users. There
may be some temporary impacts to transit during the construction of the sill, due to the
presence of turbidity curtains to prevent excessive sedimentation. After construction is
completed, transit immediately adjacent to the shoreline will be impeded, however, since that
area is codified as a restricted area, there will be no significant impact to transportation.
Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not result in significant impacts to
transportation.
3.7 Public Health and Safety
This discussion of public health and safety includes consideration for any activities, occurrences,
or operations that have the potential to affect the safety, well-being, or health of members of
the public. A safe environment is one in which there is no, or optimally reduced, potential for
death, serious bodily injury or illness, or property damage. The primary goal is to identify and
prevent potential accidents or impacts on the general public. Public health and safety within
this EA discusses information pertaining to community emergency services, construction
activities, operations, and environmental health and safety risks to children.
3.7.1.1 No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Action would not occur and there would be a
continued significant risk to public health and safety. Fencing behind the housing area is in
place to prevent children and adults from accessing the shoreline. However, it does not
completely prevent or restrict access. Because of the unsafe current conditions, children or
adults could fall behind the bulkheads and become entrapped. Erosion would continue to
3-24
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
occur and sediment would continue to detrimentally affect water quality in the Neuse River.
Negative impacts would occur with implementation of the No Action Alternative.
3.7.1.2 Construct Living Shoreline (Preferred Alternative) Potential Impacts
Impacts to public health and safety from the proposed action would be primarily positive
impacts, as increases to water quality will reduce the number of water borne
illnesses/pathogens present in the Neuse River, making consumption of seafood from the river
safer.
Residents and patrons of the air station will have safe access to the shoreline where they are
able to recreate and exercise with stable shorelines. During construction, all safety procedures
will be followed in order to ensure the safety of construction workers and patrons of the air
station. Lighting and signage will be installed once construction is complete to avoid nighttime
boating accidents.
Therefore, implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not result in significant impacts
to public health and safety.
3.8 Summary of Potential Impacts to Resources and Impact Avoidance and Minimization
A summary of the potential impacts associated with each of the action alternatives and the No
Action Alternative is presented in Table 3-6.
3-25
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
This page intentionally left blank.
3-26
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
Table 3-6 Summary of potential impacts to Resources
Resource Area
No Action Alternative
Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative)
Air Quality
•
The No Action Alternative would have no
impacts to air quality.
•
The emissions associated with construction
would be temporary and localized.
Water Resources
•
Continued erosion and increased sediment
into surface waters
•
Reduce erosion and sediment inputs into the
Neuse River
•
Storm surge and flooding would continue to
•
Provide habitat diversity
threaten structures along the shoreline
•
Provide Flood Control
•
Erosion would impact wetlands
•
Provide protection of coastal zone and
shorelines
Geological Resources
•
Continued erosion and increased sediment
into surface waters
•
Provide protection of soils and reduction of
erosion to preserve land
Biological Resources
•
Continued erosion and increased sediment
into surface waters
•
Terrestrial vegetation — Re-establish functional
riparian buffer
•
Decreased water quality due to turbidity and
sediment loads
•
Terrestrial Wildlife — Improved access to Neuse
River and its resources
•
Continued lack of diverse habitat and
detrimental to marine wildlife
•
Marine Vegetation — Possibility to restore SAV
in the Neuse
•
Marine Wildlife — Increased diversity of habitat
•
Threatened and Endangered Species - no
impact.
Infrastructure
•
Continued erosion puts infrastructure at risk
•
Protection from erosion and flooding for critical
•
More frequent and costly maintenance and
infrastructure
repair to maintain status quo
•
Reduction in frequency and cost of
maintenance and repairs
3-27
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
Transportation
•
•
The No Action Alternative would not impact
transportation or traffic on station roads.
Increased sedimentation into the Neuse River
could cause shoaling and require increased
dredging to maintain navigation channels for
vessels.
•
•
No impacts to transportation or traffic on
station roads.
Granite sill would be marked so as not to
obstruct navigation in public trust waters.
Public Health and
•
Continued erosion and increased sediment
•
Reduced erosion and sediment into surface
Safety
into surface waters will continue to degrade
waters will improve water quality
water quality
•
Improve safety for residents living next to
•
Continued risk to residents living and
recreating in the area due to unsafe bulkheads
shoreline or recreating in the area
3-28
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
4 Cumulative Impacts
This section (1) defines cumulative impacts, (2) describes past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future actions relevant to cumulative impacts, (3) analyzes the incremental
interaction the proposed action may have with other actions, and (4) evaluates cumulative
impacts potentially resulting from these interactions.
4.1 Definition of Cumulative Impacts
The approach taken in the analysis of cumulative impacts follows the objectives of the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations, and CEQ guidance. Cumulative impacts are defined in 40 CFR section 1508.7
as "the impact on the environment that results from the incremental impact of the action
when added to the other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless
of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative
impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over
a period of time."
To determine the scope of environmental impact analyses, agencies shall consider cumulative
actions, which when viewed with other proposed actions have cumulatively significant
impacts and should therefore be discussed in the same impact analysis document.
In addition, CEQ and USEPA have published guidance addressing implementation of
cumulative impact analyses —Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative
Effects Analysis (CEQ 2005) and Consideration of Cumulative Impacts in EPA Review of NEPA
Documents (USEPA 1999). CEQ guidance entitled Considering Cumulative Impacts Under
NEPA (1997) states that cumulative impact analyses should
"...determine the magnitude and significance of the environmental consequences of the
proposed action in the context of the cumulative impacts of other past, present, and future
actions...identify significant cumulative impacts...[and]...focus on truly meaningful impacts."
Cumulative impacts are most likely to arise when a relationship or synergism exists between a
proposed action and other actions expected to occur in a similar location or during a similar
time period. Actions overlapping with or in close proximity to the proposed action would be
expected to have more potential for a relationship than those more geographically separated.
Similarly, relatively concurrent actions would tend to offer a higher potential for
cumulative impacts. To identify cumulative impacts, the analysis needs to address the
following three fundamental questions.
• Does a relationship exist such that affected resource areas of the proposed action might
interact with the affected resource areas of past, present, or reasonably foreseeable
actions?
4-1
Cumulative Impacts

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
• If one or more of the affected resource areas of the proposed action and another
action could be expected to interact, would the proposed action affect or be affected by
impacts of the other action?
• If such a relationship exists, then does an assessment reveal any potentially significant
impacts not identified when the proposed action is considered alone?
4.2 Scope of Cumulative Impacts Analysis
The scope of the cumulative impacts analysis involves both the geographic extent of the effects
and the time frame in which the effects could be expected to occur. For this EA, the study area
delineates the geographic extent of the cumulative impacts analysis. In general, the study area
will include those areas previously identified in Chapter 3 for the respective resource areas. The
time frame for cumulative impacts centers on the timing of the proposed action.
Another factor influencing the scope of cumulative impacts analysis involves identifying other
actions to consider. Beyond determining that the geographic scope and time frame for the
actions interrelate to the proposed action, the analysis employs the measure of "reasonably
foreseeable" to include or exclude other actions. For the purposes of this analysis, public
documents prepared by federal, state, and local government agencies form the primary sources
of information regarding reasonably foreseeable actions. Documents used to identify other
actions include notices of intent for EISs and EAs, management plans, land use plans, and other
planning related studies.
4.3 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions
This section will focus on past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects at and near
the Proposed Action locale. In determining which projects to include in the cumulative impacts
analysis, a preliminary determination was made regarding the past, present, or reasonably
foreseeable action. Specifically, using the first fundamental question included in Section 4.1, it
was determined if a relationship exists such that the affected resource areas of the Proposed
Action (included in this EA) might interact with the affected resource area of a past, present, or
reasonably foreseeable action. If no such potential relationship exists, the project was not
carried forward into the cumulative impacts analysis. In accordance with CEQ guidance (CEQ
2005), these actions considered but excluded from further cumulative effects analysis are not
catalogued here as the intent is to focus the analysis on the meaningful actions relevant to
informed decision -making. Projects included in this cumulative impacts analysis are briefly
described in the following subsections.
4.3.1 Past Actions
Grow the Force in North Carolina. The Marine Corps prepared an EIS in December 2009 to
evaluate the environmental impacts associated with an increase in 9,900 Marine Corps and
civilian personnel at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, MCAS New River, and MCAS Cherry
Point. Also analyzed was the construction of new infrastructure and demolition and upgrades to
existing infrastructure to support the staff increases. No significant impacts to resources from
4-2
Cumulative Impacts

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
the addition of personnel and construction of associated facilities at MCAS Cherry Point were
identified. A Record of Decision for the action was published on February 2, 2010 (DoN 2010a).
All construction projects at MCAS Cherry Point associated with the Grow the Force action are
currently complete; therefore, there would be no temporal overlap with the construction
proposed in this EA.
Basing the U.S. Marine Corps F-35 on the East Coast. The U.S. DoN prepared an EIS in May
2010 to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with basing of three F-35 operational
squadrons and the Pilot Training Center at MCAS Beaufort in Beaufort, South Carolina, and
eight operational squadrons at MCAS Cherry Point (DoN 2010b). To support the basing action,
the proposed action included: construction and renovation of airfield facilities and
infrastructure necessary to accommodate and maintain the F-35 squadrons; changes to
personnel to accommodate squadron staffing; and required F-35 training operations. The F-35
aircraft replace legacy Marine Corps F/A- 18A/B/C/D Hornet and AV-8B Harrier aircraft. The EIS
determined that there would be no significant, immitigable impacts at MCAS Cherry Point. A
Record of Decision for the action was published on December 15, 2010 (DoN 2010b).
Fleet Readiness Center East Facilities Improvements in Support of F-35 Depot Capability
Establishment. The U.S. DoN prepared an EA in June 2013 to evaluate the environmental
impacts associated with establishing depot -level maintenance capabilities for the F-35 aircraft
at Fleet Readiness Center East at MCAS Cherry Point. Construction of new facilities and
modification of an existing facility were considered. The analysis indicated there would be no
significant impact to resources associated with the proposed construction of new facilities and
modification of an existing facility in support of establishing the Fleet readiness Center.
4.3.2 Present and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions
U.S. 70, Havelock Bypass. In December 2016, a Record of Decision was signed by the
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration for the construction of a 10.3-
mile four -lane divided bypass around the southwest side of the City of Havelock and MCAS
Cherry Point (Federal Highway Administration 2016). The EIS concluded that there would be
impacts from change in land use, impacts to community facilities from displacement of the
Craven County Waste Transfer facility, water quality impacts from increased stormwater runoff,
localized increases in noise from traffic, fragmentation of some plant communities, and impacts
to wetlands. Construction is to be completed in 2021 (DoT 2015). There would be a temporal
overlap with the construction under the preferred alternative analyzed in this EA.
Roadway Improvements in Support of Flightline Utilities Modernization. The Marine Corps
prepared an EA in May of 2017 to evaluate the environmental impacts of making improvements
to 5th Avenue and C Street and creating temporary parking areas to ensure these streets could
accept the volume of traffic diverted from 6th Avenue and A Street during the flightline utilities
modernization project with minimal impact to traffic flow and that adequate parking would be
available to offset parking area closures (DoN 2017). The proposed roadway improvements
would be implemented in two phases. Phase 1 would: establish temporary parking area(s);
extend 5th Avenue at the northwest and southeast terminus points; and widen C Street. Phase
4-3
Cumulative Impacts

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
2 would: establish permanent replacement asphalt parking areas; and remove the temporary
parking areas. Facility demolition would be required in some areas. Phase 1 of the project
began in FY 2019 and Phase 2 will begin in FY 2021 with each phase requiring approximately
two years. The EA concluded there would be minor to negligible adverse impacts during
construction and positive impacts to traffic and transportation.
Bulkhead Repairs. Repairs to the existing bulkhead at Miller's Landing are being conducted to
repair structural deficiencies that were identified, as well as sever sinkholes that formed along
the length of the bulkhead. These actions will be completed prior to the construction of the
living shoreline. Impacts to water resources were negligible and qualified for a Nationwide
Permit.
4.4 Cumulative Impact Analysis
The following analysis of cumulative impacts is organized by environmental component in the
same order presented in Chapter 3. Only the environmental components that have the
potential to have cumulative impacts resulting from the incremental effects of the Preferred
Alternative are addressed. Where feasible, the cumulative impacts were assessed using
quantifiable data; however, for many of the resources included for analysis, quantifiable data is
not available and a qualitative analysis was undertaken. In addition, where an analysis of
potential environmental effects for future actions has not been completed, assumptions were
made regarding cumulative impacts related to this EA's Proposed Action where possible. The
analytical methodology presented in Chapter 3, which was used to determine potential impacts
to the various resources analyzed in this document, was also used to determine cumulative
impacts.
4.4.1 Air Quality
4.4.1.1 Description of Geographic Study Area
The study area for cumulative air quality impacts is the county within which the project would
occur, Craven County. Past, present, and future actions have the potential to cumulatively
increase the criteria air pollutants within the county.
4.4.1.2 Relevant Past, Present, and Future Actions
The air emissions associated with past projects described in Section 4.3.1 were temporary
during construction and demolition of those facilities and improvements and would not interact
with the proposed action.
4.4.1.3 Cumulative Impact Analysis
Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Action combined with the past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result in significant impacts within the region
of influence.
4-4
Cumulative Impacts

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
4.4.2 Water Resources
4.4.2.1 Description of Geographic Study Area
The proposed study area for cumulative water resources impacts would be the Neuse River
shoreline.
4.4.2.2 Relevant Past, Present, and Future Actions
Present actions that may interact with the proposed action is the repair of bulkhead structures
in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline. These repairs are being done prior to the living
shoreline construction and caused negligible impacts to water resources. The repairs were
permitted through the Nationwide Permitting process.
4.4.2.3 Cumulative Impact Analysis
Cumulative water resources impacts from past, present, and future actions within the ROI
would be less than significant. Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Action combined
with the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result in
significant impacts within the ROI.
4.4.3 Geological Resources
4.4.3.1 Description of Geographic Study Area
The proposed study area for cumulative geological resources impacts would be the Neuse River
shoreline.
4.4.3.2 Relevant Past, Present, and Future Actions
Present actions that may interact with the proposed action is the repair of bulkhead structures
in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline. These repairs are being done prior to the living
shoreline construction and caused negligible impacts to geological resources.
4.4.3.3 Cumulative Impact Analysis
Cumulative impacts to geological resources from past, present, and future actions within the
ROI would be less than significant. Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Action
combined with the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result
in significant impacts within the ROI.
4.4.4 Biological Resources
4.4.4.1 Description of Geographic Study Area
The proposed study area for cumulative biological resources impacts would be the Neuse River
shoreline.
4-5
Cumulative Impacts

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
4.4.4.2 Relevant Past, Present, and Future Actions
None of the past, present, or reasonably foreseeable actions would interact with the affected
resource areas of the Proposed Action.
4.4.4.3 Cumulative Impact Analysis
Cumulative biological resource impacts from past, present, and future actions within the ROI
would be less than significant. Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Action combined
with the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result in
significant impacts within the ROI.
4.4.5 Infrastructure
4.4.5.1 Description of Geographic Study Area
The proposed study area for cumulative biological resources impacts would be the Neuse River
shoreline.
4.4.5.2 Relevant Past, Present, and Future Actions
Present actions that may interact with the proposed action is the repair of bulkhead structures
in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline. These repairs are being done prior to the living
shoreline construction and resulted in positive impacts to infrastructure.
4.4.5.3 Cumulative Impact Analysis
Cumulative infrastructure impacts from past, present, and future actions within the ROI would
be less than significant. Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Action combined with the
past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result in significant
impacts within the ROI.
4.4.6 Public Health and Safety
4.4.6.1 Description of Geographic Study Area
The proposed study area for cumulative biological resources impacts would be the Neuse River
shoreline.
4.4.6.2 Relevant Past, Present, and Future Actions
Present actions that may interact with the proposed action is the repair of bulkhead structures
in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline. These repairs are being done prior to the living
shoreline construction and resulted in positive impacts to public health and safety.
4.4.6.3 Cumulative Impact Analysis
Cumulative public health and safety impacts from past, present, and future actions within the
ROI would be less than significant. Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Action
4-6
Cumulative Impacts

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
combined with the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result
in significant impacts within the ROI.
4-7
Cumulative Impacts

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
5 Other Considerations Required by NEPA
5.1 Consistency with Other Federal, State, and Local Laws, Plans, Policies, and Regulations
In accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 1502.16(c), analysis of
environmental consequences shall include discussion of possible conflicts between the
Proposed Action and the objectives of federal, regional, state and local land use plans, policies,
and controls. Table 5-1 identifies the principal federal and state laws and regulations that are
applicable to the Proposed Action, and describes briefly how compliance with these laws and
regulations would be accomplished.
Table 5-1 Principal Federal and State Laws Applicable to the Proposed Action
Federal, State, Local, and Regional Land Use Plans, Policies,
and Controls
Status of Compliance
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); CEQ NEPA
implementing regulations; Navy procedures for Implementing
N EPA
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Clean Air Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Clean Water Act
Approval of Individual
404/401 Permit will
document compliance.
Rivers and Harbors Act
Approval of Individual
404/401 Permit will
document compliance.
Coastal Zone Management Act
Concurrence with Coastal
Consistency Determination
will document compliance.
National Historic Preservation Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Endangered Species Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Reauthorization Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Marine Mammal Protection Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Comprehensive Environmental Response and Liability Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
5-1
Other Considerations Required by NEPA

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline
April 2021
Table 5-1 Principal Federal and State Laws Applicable to the Proposed Action
Federal, State, Local, and Regional Land Use Plans, Policies,
and Controls
Status of Compliance
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Toxic Substances Control Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Farmland Protection Policy Act
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Executive Order 12088, Federal Compliance with Pollution
Control Standards
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-income
Populations
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental,
Energy, and Transportation Management
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
Executive Order 13696, Planning for Federal Sustainability in
the Next Decade
Completion of EA will
document compliance.
5.2 Irreversible or Irretrievable Commitments of Resources
Resources that are irreversibly or irretrievably committed to a project are those that are used
on a long-term or permanent basis. This includes the use of non-renewable resources such as
metal and fuel, and natural or cultural resources. These resources are irretrievable in that they
would be used for this project when they could have been used for other purposes. Human
labor is also considered an irretrievable resource. Another impact that falls under this category
is the unavoidable destruction of natural resources that could limit the range of potential uses
of that particular environment.
Implementation of the Proposed Action would involve human labor; the consumption of fuel,
oil, and lubricants for construction vehicles. Loss of shallow water habitat is a potential
irreversible loss, however, that shallow water habitat will be replaced with coastal marsh
habitat, which could be considered a more suitable habitat. Implementing the Proposed Action
would not result in significant irreversible or irretrievable commitment of resources.
Implementing the No Action Alternative would result in the irreversible loss of land into the
Neuse River from erosion.
5-2
Other Considerations Required by NEPA

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
5.3 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
This EA has determined that the alternatives considered would not result in any significant
impacts. Implementing the alternatives would result in the following unavoidable
environmental impacts:
• Loss of open water habitat.
5.4 Relationship between Short -Term Use of the Environment and Long -Term Productivity
NEPA requires an analysis of the relationship between a project's short-term impacts on the
environment and the effects that these impacts may have on the maintenance and
enhancement of the long-term productivity of the affected environment. Impacts that narrow
the range of beneficial uses of the environment are of particular concern. This refers to the
possibility that choosing one development site reduces future flexibility in pursuing other
options, or that using a parcel of land or other resources often eliminates the possibility of
other uses at that site.
In the short-term, effects to the human environment with implementation of the Proposed
Action would primarily relate to the construction activity itself. Air quality and noise would be
impacted in the short-term. Having the living shoreline in place would not significantly impact
the long-term natural resource productivity of the area. The Proposed Action would not result
in any impacts that would significantly reduce environmental productivity or permanently
narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment.
5-3
Other Considerations Required by NEPA

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
6 References
Ator, S.W., J.M. Denver, D.E. Krantz, W.L. Newell, and S.K. Martucci. 2005. Physiography of the
Mid -Atlantic Coastal Plain. Available online at:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/2005/pp1680/pdf/Platel.pdf (Accessed 30 March 2021).
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). (1997). Considering Cumulative Effects Under the
National Environmental Policy Act. Washington, DC. January.
CEQ. (2005). Guidance On The Consideration Of Past Actions In Cumulative Effects Analysis.
Washington, DC. June.
Hightower, J. E. 2001. Status of shortnose sturgeon in the Neuse River, North Carolina.
Unpublished North Carolina State University research proposal.
LeBlond, R.J., J.O. Fussell, and A.L. Braswell. 1994. Inventory of the Rare Species, Natural
Communities, and Critical Areas of the Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station, North
Carolina. Edited by I.K. Smith. Prepared for the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. June 1994.
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2002. National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered
Species Act Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion for Ongoing Ordnance Delivery at
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point Bombing Range Target 9 and Bombing Target 11
in Pamlico Sound, North Carolina. 27 September 2002 from Joseph E. Powers, Ph.D.,
National Marine Fisheries Service Acting Regional Administrator, to Mr. William H.
Rogers, Natural Resources Manager, Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Water Resources.
2020. Surface Water Classifications. Available online at:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.htmlid=6e125ad7628f4946
94e259c80dd64265 (Accessed on 29 March 2021).
North Carolina Geological Survey. 1991. Generalized Geologic Map of North Carolina.
Reprinted, 1996.
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC). 2020. Available online at:
http://www.ncwildlife.org
Rogers, W. 1999. Personal communication regarding sightings of red -cockaded woodpeckers at
MCAS Cherry Point. November 1999.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2005. Description of "Ecological Subregions: Sections of
the Conterminous United States". First Approximation. U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service. Ecosystem Management Coordination. Washington, DC 20250.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS). 2009.
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Craven County, North Carolina. Available
online at: http://soildatamart.nres.usda.gov/Survey.aspx?County=NC049
U.S. Department of Navy (DoN). 2010a. Record of Decision. Environmental Impact
Statement. U.S. Maring Corps Grow the Force at MCB Camp Lejeune, MCAS New River,
and MCAS Cherry Point, North Carolina. 22 January.
U.S. Department of Navy (DoN). 2010b. Record of Decision. U.S. Marine Corps East Coast Basing
of the F-35 Aircraft. 9 December.
6-1
References

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
U.S. Department of Navy (DoN). 2017. Final Environmental Assessment for Roadway
Improvements in Support of Flightline Utilities Modernization at MCAS Cherry Point,
North Carolina. May.
U.S. Department of Navy (DoN). 2009. Assessment of the Commercial and Recreational Uses of
the Waters Surrounding MCAS Cherry Point, BT-9, and BT-11. August.
U.S. Department of Transportation (DoT). 2015. Administrative Action Final Environmental
Impact Statement, Volume I of II, US 70 Havelock Bypass, Craven County, NC. October.
U.S. Department of Transportation (DoT). 2016. Record of Decision for US 70 Havelock Bypass.
Federal Aid Project No. NHF-70 (49). 16 December.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Consideration Of Cumulative Impacts In EPA
Review of NEPA Documents. Available online at:
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/cumulative.pdf
(Accessed 30 March 2021).
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Rough -leaved Loosestrife Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service. Atlanta, GA. 32 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. ECOS American Alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis). Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/profile/speciesProfile?sld=776 (Accessed 30 March 2021).
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. ECOS West Indian manatee (Trichechus
manatus). Available online at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 (Accessed 30 March 2021).
U.S. Marine Corps (USMC). 2001. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan for Marine
Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina. September 2001.
U.S. Marine Corps (USMC). 2009. Assessment of the Commercial and Recreational Uses of the
Waters Surrounding the Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point and the Bombing Targets
at Piney Island and Brant Island Shoal.
U.S. Marine Corps (USMC). 2012. MCAS Cherry Point Integrated Natural Resources
Management Plan.
U.S. Marine Corps (USMC). 2019. MCAS Cherry Point Shoreline Erosion and Living Shoreline
Stabilization Study.
6-2
References

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
7 List of Preparers
This EA was prepared by MCAS Cherry Point personnel.
U.S. Marine Corps
Jessica Guilianelli, Natural Resources Manager
Environmental Affairs Department, MCAS Cherry Point
Laura Hendrick, Forestry Technician
Environmental Affairs Department, MCAS Cherry Point
William Wescott, Natural Resources Specialist
Environmental Affairs Department, MCAS Cherry Point
7-1
List of Preparers

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
This page intentionally left blank.
7-2
List of Preparers

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
Appendix A
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
A-1

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
This page intentionally left blank.
A-2

SCALE
�.�..` 100ft
LEGEND
1994 Shoreline
2005 Shoreline
2017 Shoreline
Bulkhead (2017 Digitized Location)
Google Earth
Figure #1. Shoreline Segment #1 adjacent to Slocum Creek Mouth
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Google Earth Historical Shoreline Change I Page 1

LEGEND
1994 Shoreline
2005 Shoreline
2017 Shoreline
Bulkhead (2017 Digitized Location)
Google Earth
Figure #2. Shoreline Segment #2 and Bulkhead #3495 (east of Figure #1)
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Google Earth Historical Shoreline Change 1 Page 2

Bulkhead (2017 Digitized Location)
Figure #3. Shoreline Segment #3 and Bulkhead #3494 (east of Figure #2)
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Google Earth Historical Shoreline Change I Page 3

LEGEND
1994 Shoreline
2005 Shoreline
2017 Shoreline
Bulkhead (2017 Digitized Location)
SCALE
100ft
3492 & 3493
Figure #4. Shorelines Segment #4 and Bulkhead #3492/3493 (east of Figure #3)
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Google Earth Historical Shoreline Change I Page 4

SCALE
100ft
3492 & 3493
LEGEND
1994 Shoreline
2005 Shoreline
2017 Shoreline
Bulkhead (2017 Digitized Location)
Figure #5. Shoreline Segment #5, Bulkhead #3491, Segment #6, and Beginning of Bulkhead #3490 (east of Figure #4)
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Google Earth Historical Shoreline Change 1 Page 5

LEGEND
1994 Shoreline
2005 Shoreline
2017 Shoreline
Bulkhead (2017 Digitized Location)
SCALE
Figure #6. Bulkhead #3491, Shoreline Segment #6, Bulkhead #3490, Segment #7, Bulkhead #3489, and Segment #8 (east of Figure #5)
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Google Earth Historical Shoreline Change 1 Page 6

LEGEND
1994 Shoreline
2005 Shoreline
2017 Shoreline
Bulkhead (2017 Digitized Location)
SCALE
100ft
Figure #7. Bulkhead #3488 and Shoreline Segment #9 (east of Figure# 6).
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Google Earth Historical Shoreline Change I Page 7

LEGEND
1994 Shoreline
2005 Shoreline
2017 Shoreline
Bulkhead (2017 Digitized Location)
SCALE
100 ft
Figure 8. Shoreline segment #10 (NW property boundary of MCAS Cherry Point).
Cherry Point Shoreline Change Comparison
Google Earth Historical Shoreline Change I Page 8

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
Appendix B
Coastal Consistency Determination
B-1

EA to Construct a Living Shoreline April 2021
This page intentionally left blank.
A-2

COASTAL CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION FOR
WO# 6973177 - INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE,
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CHERRY POINT, CRAVEN COUNTY, NC
6 May 2021
The United State Marine Corps (USMC) has determined that implementing the proposed action
would not result in any significant adverse impact to North Carolina's coastal zone.
1. Background
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina has identified a critical need to make
repairs to bulkheads and shoreline areas at MCAS, Cherry Point in Craven County, North
Carolina. The shoreline areas and bulkhead facilities sustained significant damage from
Hurricane Florence which impacted the area in September 2018.
The purpose of this project is to address the critical repair needs of shoreline and bulkhead areas
and to provide improvements that will preserve the shoreline areas from erosion or further
degradation.
MCAS, Cherry Point previously commissioned the completion of two studies that formulated the
basis of the Scope of Work for this project, as follows:
A. Bulkhead Condition Assessment Report [Bulkhead Report]
MCAS, Cherry Point, North Carolina
Prepared by: NRW Engineering, PC
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
July 31, 2018
B. Living Shoreline Stabilization Study [Shoreline Report]
MCAS, Cherry Point, North Carolina
Prepared by: Environmental Solutions, Inc.
10475 Fortune Parkway, Suite 201
Jacksonville, FL 32256
October 29, 2018
The Bulkhead Report provides a condition assessment of multiple bulkhead segments at
MCAS, Cherry Point, North Carolina and at BT-11 training area in Carteret County, North
Carolina.
1/10

The Shoreline Report provides a preliminary structural evaluation of existing bulkheads as of
October 2017 (prior to Hurricane Florence) and provides conceptual site layouts incorporating
living shoreline stabilization at various shoreline segments.
Copies of each of these reports are available for review, if desired.
Based upon the information contained in these studies and upon a general assessment of
shoreline and bulkhead conditions after Hurricane Florence, MCAS, Cherry Point developed a
priority list of project areas to be addressed. The projects were configured based upon priority,
type of work, anticipated permitting actions and the anticipated timing of funding and execution.
This permit application addresses the two areas for - the Install Living Shoreline project, MCAS
Cherry Point WO# 6973177.
A detailed description of each project area is outlined below:
This project covers two project areas. Each area is designated to receive shoreline
stabilization through the implementation of Living Shoreline Techniques. A total of
approximately 9,689 LF (7,590 - Tip Station Proper; 2,099 LF - West of Navy Docks) of
shoreline will be stabilized in the project.
For each of these project areas, the waterward toe of the rock sills are proposed to be
positioned approximately 30 feet waterward of the Normal Water Level (NWL). The
rock sills will be segmented and/or overlapped to facilitate flushing and cross -shore
movement of marine life. Additionally, sandy fill material will be installed landward of
the rock sill up to an elevation that corresponds to Mean High Water. Appropriate
coastal vegetation will be planted in the fill areas for the purpose of creating intertidal
coastal marsh.
2. Federal Activity
The purpose of the project is to make essential repairs to deteriorated natural shoreline areas.
These areas have deteriorated due to recent hurricane events (most notably Hurricane Florence,
September 2018).
The proposed work is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the federally approved
North Carolina Coastal Management Program. A Pre -Construction Notification is necessary to
properly execute the project. Due to the total cumulative impacts to open waters, the US Army
Corps of Engineers will issue an Individual Permit (IP) for the project. Both the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have been notified and must
review and approve the project. All necessary permit applications have been made to properly
execute the project.
2/10

3. Areas of Environmental Concern
The Coastal Resources Commission (CRC) defines Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) as
areas of natural importance which may be easily destroyed by erosion or flooding; or areas that
may have environmental, social, economic, or aesthetic values that provide value.
The CRC has established four categories of AECs which are:
The Estuarine and Ocean System
The Ocean Hazard System
Public Water Supplies
Natural and Cultural Resource Areas.
4. Relevant Coastal Area Policies
15A NCAC 07H .0200 ESTUARINE AND OCEAN SYSTEMS
a. 15A NCAC 07H .0205 COASTAL WETLANDS — defines and establishes
management objectives for coastal wetlands "to conserve and manage coastal wetlands so
as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological, social, and economic and aesthetic values;
to coordinate and establish a management system capable of conserving and utilizing
coastal wetlands as a natural resource essential to the functioning of the entire estuarine
system".
There are no coastal wetlands identified in the project areas. All project work will occur
below the Mean High Water (MHW) Elevation. There are coastal wetlands adjacent to
and near the project areas; however, these wetlands will not be impacted by the proposed
project.
b. 15A NCAC 07H .0206 ESTUARINE WATERS — defines and establishes
management objectives for estuarine waters in order "to conserve and manage the
important features of estuarine waters so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological,
social, aesthetic, and economic values; to coordinate and establish a management system
capable of conserving and utilizing estuarine waters so as to maximize their benefits to
man and the estuarine and ocean system".
All project work will occur below the Mean High Water Level (MHW). The estuarine
bottoms will be impacted by the footprint of the new rip rap and sill backfill and
vegetation. Turbidity curtains will be employed around all in -water work areas to reduce
potential damage from sediment. Erosion and sedimentation control devices will be
installed on adjacent upland areas to prevent erosion and sedimentation.
No wetland areas will be impacted by the proposed construction.
3/10

The project as proposed is consistent with the general use standards and specific use
standards found in 15A NCAC 07H .0206.
c. 15A NCAC 07H .0207 PUBLIC TRUST AREA — defines and establishes
management objectives in order "to protect public rights for navigation and recreation
and to conserve and manage the public trust areas so as to safeguard and perpetuate their
biological, economic, and aesthetic value".
The project will not adversely affect the value of coastal uses and will not affect the
public's right or access to use the water. The project areas are located in Marine Corps
Air Station Cherry Point. Access to the base is controlled and the base is not open to the
public. No work to be performed shall affect navigation of the channel The proposed
project would not impact coastal resources or prohibit access to coastal resources by the
public.
d. 15A NCAC 07H .0208 USE STANDARDS — defines general and specific use
standards necessary to protect coastal resources including but not limited to primary
nursery areas, shellfish beds, Outstanding Resource Waters, and beds of submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAVs).
None of the in -water project areas are located within waters designated as primary
nursery areas, shellfish beds, Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), or areas containing
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV's).
The project as proposed is consistent with the general use standards and specific use
standards found in 15A NCAC 07H .0208.
e. 15A NCAC 07H .0209 COASTAL SHORELINES — defines and establishes
management objectives to ensure that "shoreline development is compatible with the
dynamic nature of coastal shorelines as well as the values and the management objectives
of the estuarine and ocean system." Other objectives are to conserve and manage the
important natural features of the estuarine and ocean system.
The project will occur along estuarine shorelines. All of the estuarine shoreline work
proposed is intended to limit further degradation of shoreline areas. Extensive erosion
and damage to adjacent vegetation has occurred over the last two years, particularly, from
Hurricane Florence (September 2018).
The project as proposed is consistent with the general use standards and specific use
standards found in 15A NCAC 07H .0209.
5. Coastal Area Policies
CAMA GENERAL POLICY GUIDELINES
The North Carolina CAMA sets forth 11 General Policy Guidelines, addressing:
4/10

a. Shoreline erosion policies;
b. Shorefront access policies;
c. Coastal Energy policies;
d. Post -disaster policies;
e. Floating structure policies;
f. Mitigation policies;
g. Coastal water quality policies;
h. Policies on use of coastal airspace;
i. Policies on water- and wetland -based target areas for military training areas;
j. Polices on beneficial use and availability of materials resulting from the excavation or
maintenance of navigational channels; and
k. Polices on ocean mining.
The purpose of these rules is to establish generally applicable objective and policies to be
followed in the public and private use of land and water areas within the coastal area of North
Carolina. The following is an analysis of the applicability of these policies to the proposed
action and the projects' lack of impact on North Carolina's coastal zone.
a. 15A NCAC 07M .0200 SHORELINE EROSION POLICIES
One specific goal of this project is to eliminate or limit the potential of shoreline erosion
and degradation of the estuarine shoreline area. Shoreline stabilization methods proposed
are within the policies, Rules and Regulations established by CAMA.
The estuarine shoreline at MCAS Cherry Point was severely impacted by recent
hurricane events. This project will address shoreline erosion issues at the most critically
damaged areas.
b. 15A NCAC 07M .0300 SHOREFRONT ACCESS POLICIES
The project is on a Marine Corps Air Station that is not accessible by the general public.
Since the project does not affect the public's access to water, the policy is not applicable.
c. 15A NCAC 07M .0400 COASTAL ENERGY POLICIES
Since the project does not involve the development of any major energy facilities these
policies are not applicable.
d. 15A NCAC 07M .0500 POST DISASTER POLICIES
All project work will be completed in accordance with 15A NCAC 07M .0500, Post -
Disaster Policies.
e. 15A NCAC 07M .0600 FLOATING STRUCTURE POLICIES
5/10

The policy states that a "floating structure" is any structure, not a boat, supported by a
means of flotation, designed to be used without a permanent foundation, which is used or
intended for human habitation or commerce.
This project does not include any floating structures so this policy does not apply.
f. 15A NCAC 07M .0700 MITIGATION POLICY
The project design at all project areas includes reasonable means and measures to lessen
impacts to the environment and to enhance the environment where possible. The project
work will significantly reduce the potential for shoreline erosion and damage, particularly
during severe weather events.
None of the proposed project work requires mitigation. The Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) and the US Army Corps of Engineers will review and issue a 401/404 Permit for
the proposed work.
The proposed project is in compliance with 15A NCAC 07M .0700.
g. 15A NCAC 07M .0800 COASTAL WATER QUALITY POLICIES
The proposed project is in compliance with 15A NCAC 07M .0800, Coastal Water
Quality Policies. The project work will not result in a degradation of water quality in the
project area. New sources of runoff or pollution will not be created by the proposed
action.
The project will result in a more eco-friendly system of shoreline stabilization in multiple
project areas which will enhance habitat and improve water quality.
h. 15A NCAC 07M .0900 POLICIES ON USE OF COASTAL AIRSPACE
The project does not involve use of coastal airspace. The policy is not applicable to this
project.
i. 15A NCAC 07M .1000 POLICIES ON WATER — AND WETLAND -BASED
TARGET AREAS FOR MILITARY TRAINING AREAS
The project does not have water and wetland based target areas for military training. The
policy is not applicable to this project.
j. 15A NCAC 07M .1100 POLICIES ON BENEFICIAL USE AND
AVAILABILITY OF MATERIALS RESULTING IN EXCAVATION OR
MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATIONAL CHANNELS
6/10

The project work does not include any dredging activities that would generate materials
that would be of any beneficial use.
k. 15A NCAC 07M .1200 POLICIES ON OCEAN MINING
This project does not involve ocean mining, therefore, this policy does not apply.
6. Craven County Coastal Management Land Use Policies
The CAMA required local governments in each of the 20 coastal counties in the state to prepare,
implement, and enforce a land use plan and ordinances consistent with established state and
federal policies. Specifically, local policy statements are required on resource protection;
resource production and management; economic and community development; continuing public
participation; and storm hazard mitigation, post -disaster recovery, and evacuation plans. Upon
approval by the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission, each plan becomes part of the
North Carolina Coastal Management Plan.
The 2007/2008 — 2008/2009 Craven County Land Use Plan was adopted by the County Board of
Commissioners and certified by the Coastal Resources Commission on October 30, 2009. The
Plan includes the local policies required by the Coastal Resources Commission to meet the
standards for land use planning and development in Areas of Environmental Concern. Table 1
contains a list of Craven County's comprehensive plan policies and their applicability to this
project.
7/10

Table 1
Craven County Land Use/Coastal Zone Management Policies
#
Policies
topPrl10 ebitity
cPublic
Access
P1
Craven County supports providing shoreline access for persons with
disabilities.
Consistent
P2
Craven County supports the frequency of shoreline access as defined by 15A
NCAC 7M, Section .0300, Shorefront Access Policies.
Consistent
P3
Craven County supports state/federal funding of piers for crabbing and fishing.
Not
Applicable
P4
Craven County supports the development of estuarine access areas to ensure
adequate shoreline access within all areas of the county. Areas that have
traditionally been used by the public will be given special attention, including
existing bridges and bridge replacements.
Not
Applicable
P5
Craven County opposes the loss/abandonment of any facilities dedicated to
public shoreline/water access.
Consistent
P6-P18
Residential Policies
Not
Applicable
P19 -P25
Commercial Policies
Not
Applicable
P26 —
P34
Industrial Policies
Not
Applicable
Conservation Policies
P35
Craven County supports the preservation of its rural/agricultural areas.
Not
Applicable
P36
Craven County encourages the Croatan National Forest to maintain land
holdings (no land swaps) within the vicinity of Cherry Point. These forest
areas serve as protection from encroachment.
Not
Applicable
P37
Residential, commercial, and industrial development which meets 15A NCAC
7H use standards will be allowed in estuarine shoreline, estuarine water, and
public trust areas. In all other areas, development will be allowed that is
consistent with applicable local, state, and federal regulations.
Consistent
P38
Craven County supports the enforcement of local, state, and federal
regulations and programs that minimize the threat to life and property from
flooding.
Not
Applicable
P39
Craven County supports the use of erosion control structures in estuarine
shoreline areas.
Consistent
P40
All development should be designed to protect Protected Lands and
Significant Natural Heritage Areas.
Not
Applicable
P41
Craven County will use local land use ordinances to identify development
which includes 404 and coastal wetlands.
Not
Applicable
P42
Craven County opposes the establishment of any state freshwater wetlands
regulations.
Not
Applicable
P43
Craven County supports the construction of new marinas which comply with
the policies of this plan and all other state/federal regulations.
Not
Applicable
P44
Craven County will continuously monitor the effects of sea level rise and
update the land use plan policies as necessary to protect the county's public
and private properties from rising water levels.
Not
Applicable
P45
There are no estuarine system islands of any significance in Craven County's
jurisdiction. For those islands which do exist, Craven County does not oppose
development of the islands if the development satisfies the 15A NCAC 7H use
standards.
Not
Applicable
8/10

#
Policies
topPrl10 ebitity
cP46
Craven County supports the construction of docks and piers if they are in
compliance with applicable policies of this plan and state/federal regulations.
Consistent
P47
Craven County will allow construction of dry stack storage facilities for boats
associated either with or independent of marinas. All applicable state and
federal regulations must be satisfied.
Not
Applicable
P48
Floating homes are not an issue or problem in Craven County. The county will
consider prohibiting the anchoring of floating homes within mooring fields.
Not
Applicable
Stormwater Control
P49
Craven County and its participating municipalities will support reducing soil
erosion, runoff, and sedimentation to minimize the adverse effects on surface
and subsurface water quality.
Consistent
P50
Craven County and its participating municipalities support the enforcement of
all controls and regulations, specifically design standards, tie -down
requirements, construction and installation standards, elevation requirements,
floodproofing, CAMA regulations, and FEMA regulations deemed necessary
by the Board of Commissioners to mitigate the risks of lives and property
caused by severe storms and hurricanes.
Consistent
P51
Craven County supports the discharge of stormwater runoff into coastal
wetlands if the associated construction and development does not damage
coastal wetland areas, and is permitted under applicable North Carolina Storm
Water regulations.
Not
Applicable
P52
Craven County supports reducing soil erosion, runoff, and sedimentation to
minimize the adverse effects on surface and subsurface water quality.
Consistent
P53
Craven County supports implementation of the Tar -Pamlico, Neuse and White
Oak River Basinwide Water Quality Plans.
Consistent
P54-P65
Water and Sewer Policies
Not
Applicable
P66-P78
Transportation Policies
Not
Applicable
P79-P84
Natural Hazard Areas
Consistent
Water Quality
P85
At a minimum, Craven County will rely on 15A NCAC 7H to protect water
quality.
Consistent
P86
Craven County supports protection of its surficial waters and potable water
supply.
Consistent
P87
Craven County recognizes the value of water quality maintenance to the
protection of fragile areas and to the provision of clean water.
Consistent
P88
Craven County supports the enforcement of local, state, and federal
regulations and programs that protect water quality.
Consistent
P89
Craven County supports wetlands "created" to aid in treating waste effluent.
Not
Applicable
P90
Craven County supports conserving its surficial groundwater resources.
Not
Applicable
P91
Craven County opposes the disposal of any toxic wastes, as defined in the US
Environmental Protection Agency's Listing of Hazardous Substances and
Priority Pollutants (developed pursuant to the Clean Water Act of 1977), within
its planning jurisdiction.
Not
Applicable
P92
Craven County recognizes the value of water quality maintenance to the
protection of fragile areas and to the provision of clean water for recreational
purposes and supports the control of stormwater runoff to aid in the
preservation of water quality.
The county will support existing state regulations relating to stormwater runoff
resulting from development (Stormwater Disposal Policy 15 NCAC 2H.001-
.1003)
Consistent
9/10

#
Policies
topProject
P93
Craven County supports regulation of underground storage tanks in order to
protect its groundwater resources.
Not
Applicable
P94
Craven County supports the policy that all State of North Carolina projects
should be designed to limit to the extent possible stormwater runoff into
coastal waters.
Consistent
P95
Craven County supports implementation of the Tar -Pamlico, Neuse, and
White Oak River Basin Water Quality Management Plans.
Consistent
P96
Craven County supports all aquaculture activities which meet applicable
federal, state, and local policies and permit requirements. However, Craven
County reserves the right to comment on all aquaculture activities which
require Division of Water Quality permitting.
Consistent
P7-
Not
P900
Cultural, Historic and Scenic Areas
Applicable
P101-
P113
Economic Development
Consistent
P114-
P117
Military /Community Cooperation
Consistent
P118-
Not
P130
General Health and Human Service Needs
Applicable
P131-
Not
P136
Community Appearance
Applicable
P397-
Redevelopment
Not
Applicable
7. Conclusion
In conclusion, after careful consideration of the proposed action, Marine Corps Air Station
Cherry Point has determined that implementing the proposed action is consistent with the
relevant enforceable policies of North Carolina's Coastal Management Program and will have no
adverse impacts to coastal resources. This was based on the review of the proposed project
against the enforceable policies of the North Carolina Coastal Management Program and the
Craven County's comprehensive plan policies.
10/10

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A LIVING SHORELINE AT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION CHERRY POINT, NORTH
CAROLINA
Pursuant to Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts
1500-1508) implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, Navy Regulations (32 Code of Federal
Regulations part 775), and Marine Corps Order 5090.2, the United States Marine Corps (USMC) gives
notice that an Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared and an Environmental Impact
Statement is not required for the following activities at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point.
Proposed Action: The USMC seeks to construct a living shoreline in the Neuse River along the northern
boundary of MCAS Cherry Point, Havelock, NC. This living shoreline will improve water quality, create
valuable habitat and also promote resiliency by preventing erosion and mitigating flooding that would
damage the Marine Corps' vital infrastructure.
Purpose and Need: The purpose of the Proposed Action is to construct a living shoreline that will
provide protection for USMC properties along the Neuse River, habitat for the many species that inhabit
the river, and water quality improvements. More detailed goals of this project are:
• To attenuate wave energy to reduce the rate of shoreline erosion on the Neuse River,
thereby protecting USMC assets that utilize that shoreline.
• Increase resiliency of our shoreline by adding marsh grasses and restoring appropriate
slopes that have been eroded.
• Enhance riparian habitat, shallow water habitat, and water quality in the Neuse River,
which promotes recreational uses for our Marines, Sailors, and community neighbors.
The need for the Proposed Action is to enhance the resiliency and protect valuable shorelines, which
include USMC assets that have been degraded due to erosion from coastal storms. A living shoreline
will protect the investments the USMC has made, while providing important ecological functions and
water quality improvements.
Alternatives Analyzed: The USMC considered the Proposed Action Alternative as well as the No Action
alternative.
Proposed Action Alternative. Alternative 1, the preferred alternative, would construct a living shoreline
parallel to the shoreline of the Neuse River at MCAS Cherry Point, from Slocum Creek on the west, to
Hancock Creek on the east. The living shoreline would consist of a granite sill constructed approximately
25-30 feet waterward of normal water level (NWL). This granite sill will be segmented to allow for flushing
and cross -shore movement of fish and wildlife. Oyster shell will be installed at the landward toe and the
landward fringe will be back -filled and planted with marsh grasses.
Phase 1 of the preferred alternative would permanently transform approximately 4.5 acres of bare sand
shallow water habitat into an intertidal coastal marsh vegetated with smooth cordgrass. In addition,
Phase 1 of the preferred alternative would permanently transform approximately 3.0 acres of existing
1 of 4

zone 1 riparian buffer from an eroding bare sandy beach into coastal wetlands vegetated with salt
meadow cordgrass. Phase 2 of the preferred alternative would permanently transform approximately 2.0
acres of bare sand shallow water habitat in front of existing bulkheads into an intertidal coastal marsh
vegetated with smooth cordgrass.
The overall project would provide approximately 6.5 acres of intertidal coastal marsh, vegetate
approximately 3.6 acres of zone 1 riparian buffer and install approximately 12,000 linear feet (3.3 acres)
of rock sill which provides aquatic habitat and a hard substrate for oyster colonization.
No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, a living shoreline would not be constructed.
Bulkhead repairs would continue as planned, but no additional protection would be established for those
bulkheads. The No Action Alternative does not meet the purpose and need for the Proposed Action;
however, as required by NEPA, the No Action Alternative was carried forward for analysis in this EA. The
No Action Alternative was used to analyze the consequences of not undertaking the Proposed Action, not
simply conclude no impact, and will serve to establish a comparative baseline for analysis.
Environmental Effects: As summarized below, the environmental resource areas analyzed in the EA
include air quality, noise, biological resources, water resources, coastal zone, traffic and transportation,
and public health and safety. Because potential impacts were negligible or nonexistent, the following
resource areas were not evaluated in the EA: airspace, Hazardous Materials and Wastes, Cultural
Resources, Socioeconomics, and Environmental Justice. The summary of effects is focused on the
Proposed Action Alternative. The level of detail in the summary analysis is commensurate with the level
of potential effect to the resource.
Air Quality: The construction of the living shoreline could generate small, localized air quality impacts
due to the heavy equipment required. This would be intermittent, for a period of months, and would
not be significant. Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would contribute directly to emissions
of Green House Gasses from the combustion of fossil fuels. Construction activities would generate a
limited amount of emissions and would not likely contribute to global warming to any discernible
extent. Therefore, implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not result in significant impacts
to air quality.
Water Resources: The preferred action would construct a granite sill and living shoreline, which would
protect the shoreline from continued erosion. Reducing erosion would reduce sediment impacts into
the Neuse River, which would improve water quality. Short term impacts from construction could result
in increased turbidity for a brief period of time; however, these impacts would cease once construction
is complete.
The preferred alternative will impact approximately 10 acres of open water habitat; however, this
habitat will be replaced with more diverse and higher quality habitat such as intertidal coastal marsh.
The sill itself will provide a varied aquatic habitat that does not currently exist in this portion of the
Neuse River. Oyster shells placed along the landward toe of the rock sill could accelerate the
colonization of a viable oyster resource, which would provide additional water quality improvements.
A living shoreline would provide flood control and improve the overall resiliency of the installation. The
granite sill would reduce water velocities and reduce the height of wave action against the shoreline.
2 of 4

This reduction in the force of water, along with the restored marsh grass habitat immediately behind the
sill, will reduce potential for flooding, as the marsh will "absorb" the storm surge and prevent it from
reaching the upland surfaces in most storms. No freshwater wetlands will be impacted by the preferred
action. However, the preferred action will assist in preventing the continued erosion of estuarine
wetlands and adverse impacts associated with storm events. The Coastal Zone and shorelines will be
protected by the granite sill and marsh planting. A positive impact is expected.
Geological Resources: The preferred alternative will stabilize shorelines, increase resiliency, and prevent
future erosion. Therefore, implementation of this alternative would not result in significant impacts to
geological resources.
Biological Resources: Biological resources analyzed included Terrestrial Vegetation, Terrestrial Wildlife,
Marine Vegetation, Marine Wildlife, and Threatened and Endangered Species. Once construction has
been completed, the preferred action should have a positive effect on local vegetation and wildlife by
reducing shoreline erosion and increasing habitat diversity. While backfill of the living shoreline in
advance of the planting of marsh grasses may displace some wildlife, including invertebrates that utilize
the sandy bottom, it is not expected that this habitat loss would be a significant impact. Overall, the
project will increase habitat and habitat diversity, which will benefit the Neuse River wildlife
communities as a whole.
Due to the depths of water in which the work is taking place, it is unlikely that the installation will have
any impact on marine mammals that may be in the Neuse River. If marine mammals are observed
during construction, work will cease until the individuals have left the area. There would be no
significant impact on threatened and endangered species and no formal consultation between the U.S.
Navy and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
Fisheries would be required.
Infrastructure: Under the preferred alternative, the living shoreline would serve as protection to the
bulkheaded shoreline by slowing down water velocities and reducing stress on the shoreline. This would
result in less maintenance costs and reduce the threat to infrastructure from storms and erosion. The
living shoreline would increase the resiliency of the shoreline. Therefore, implementation of this action
alternative would not result in significant impacts to infrastructure.
Transportation: The Neuse River is relatively shallow in the location where the living shoreline will be
installed. Any vessel traffic in that area consists of fishermen, crabbers, and recreational users. There
may be some temporary impacts to transit during the construction of the sill, due to the presence of
turbidity curtains to prevent excessive sedimentation. After construction is completed, transit
immediately adjacent to the shoreline will be impeded, however, since that area is codified as a
restricted area, there will be no significant impact to transportation. Implementation of the Preferred
Alternative would not result in significant impacts to transportation.
Public Health and Safety: Impacts to public health and safety from the proposed action would be
primarily positive impacts, as increases to water quality will reduce the number of water borne
illnesses/pathogens present in the Neuse River, making consumption of seafood from the river safer.
Residents and patrons of the air station will have safe access to the shoreline where they are able to
recreate and exercise with stable shorelines. During construction, all safety procedures will be followed
3 of 4

in order to ensure the safety of construction workers and patrons of the air station. Lighting and
signage will be installed once construction is complete to avoid nighttime boating accidents.
Therefore, implementation of the Preferred Alternative would not result in significant impacts to public
health and safety.
Cumulative Impacts: Other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions were reviewed for
potential cumulative impacts with implementation of the Proposed Action Alternative. This analysis
occurred with an emphasis on the evaluation of air quality, noise, biological resources, water resources
traffic and transportation, and public health and safety due to the potential for cumulative impacts in
these resource areas. The analysis concluded that cumulative impacts would not be considered
significant. Not all of the actions would occur simultaneously and, when viewed collectively, there is
nothing inherently incompatible between these actions and the projects included in the Proposed
Action, nor anything to indicate that the Proposed Action would exacerbate or otherwise collectively
increase the potential for effects to the environment.
Public Involvement: The Final EA was made available via the installation website at the following Zink:
https://www.cherrypoint.marines.mil/Staff/Environmental-Affairs/.
A notice for public comment will be published in the New Bern Sun Journal.
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI): Based on analysis presented in the Final EA and FONSI, the
USMC finds that implementation of the Proposed Action Alternative will not significantly impact the
quality of the human or natural environment or generate significant controversy. Therefore, the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement will not be required.
The EA prepared by the USMC is on file and interested parties may obtain a copy from: Jessica
Guilianelli, Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, Environmental Affairs Department, PSC Box 8006,
Cherry Point, North Carolina 28533
4/coy2oz1
Date
M.R. HUBER
COLONEL
COMMANDING OFFICER
MCAS CHERRY POINT
4 of 4

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SLOCUM
GATE
MAIN GATE
PASS/ ID BUILDING
TE SERNCE R
NC HWY 101
VERTICAL DATUM DIAGRAM
MHW = ELEV +0.26
0.26'
MSL = ELEV +0.00
0.37'
0.11'
MLW = ELEV —0.11
TIDAL STATION USED:
8655151 — CEDAR ISLAND, NC
TIDAL DATA AND RELATIONSHIPS TO
NAVD88 VERTICAL DATUM OBTAINED
FROM NOAA ONLINE:
HTTPS://TIDESANDCURRENTS.NOAA.GOV
LEGEND
MHW = MEAN HIGH WATER
MSL = MEAN SEA LEVEL
MLW = MEAN LOW WATER
SEE SHEET G-003 FOR
SITE LOCATION PLAN
NORTH
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
WO #6973177
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
NAVFAC
SHEET NO.
SHEET
TITLE
12766730
1 OF 29
G-001
COVER SHEET
12766731
2 OF 29
G-002
LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS & NOTES
12766732
3 OF 29
G-003
SITE LOCATION PLAN
12766733
4 OF 29
CS101
AREA 1 — OVERALL SITE PLAN
12766734
5 OF 29
CS102
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766735
6 OF 29
CS1 03
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766736
7 OF 29
CS104
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766737
8 OF 29
CS105
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766738
9 OF 29
CS106
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766739
10 OF 29
CS107
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766740
11 OF 29
CS1 08
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766741
12 OF 29
CS109
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766742
13 OF 29
CS110
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766743
14 OF 29
CS111
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766744
15 OF 29
CS112
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766745
16 OF 29
CS113
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766746
17 OF 29
CS114
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766747
18 OF 29
CS115
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766748
19 OF 29
CS116
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766749
20 OF 29
CS117
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766750
21 OF 29
CS118
AREA 1 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766751
22 OF 29
CS119
AREA 2 — OVERALL SITE PLAN
12766752
23 OF 29
CS120
AREA 2 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766753
24 OF 29
CS121
AREA 2 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766754
25 OF 29
CS122
AREA 2 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766755
26 OF 29
CS123
AREA 2 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766756
27 OF 29
CS124
AREA 2 — ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12766757
28 OF 29
CS501
DETAILS
12766758
29 OF 29
CG501
DETAILS
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
d
w
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit. ly signed brliEjJohn-K Avolis
1,t11 f!!
44 SAS
•t
SEAL r' LI
LI
15738
2-20
Q;
LNG •�`'../um in MIN
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA
DRW MSP
CKJCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
H
z
0
0
z
0
0
z
w
w
z
c9
z
w
w
J_
0
LL
SCALE: AS NOTED
COVER SHEET
EPROJECT NO.. —
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING N0.
12766730
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SHEET 01
29
G-001
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
d
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SPECIAL MARINE CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES HAS ESTABLISHED GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR PIER, DOCK, BULKHEAD AND OTHER MARINE
CONSTRUCTION THAT INVOLVE THE GENERATION OF NOISE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POST OBSERVERS IN THE WORK AREA WHERE
MARINE CONSTRUCTION IS OCCURRING. IF A MARINE MAMMAL (A BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN OR A MANATEE) IS OBSERVED WITHIN
100 METERS OF THE PROJECT SITE WHILE WORKING, THE ACTIVITY SHALL STOP UNTIL THE ANIMAL HAS LEFT THE AREA. IF NO
IN -WATER CONSTRUCTION NOISE IS BEING GENERATED BY THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THEN THE 100 METER RULE SHALL NOT
APPLY.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MANAGE AND CONTROL ACTIVITIES TO MINIMIZE INTERFERENCE WITH AND DAMAGE TO FISH AND WILDLIFE.
THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATION SHALL NOT DISTURB FISH AND WILDLIFE BEYOND THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.
3. THE PROJECT AREAS ARE LOCATED WITHIN AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN. SIGNIFICANT NATURAL RESOURCES EXIST AT
AND ADJACENT TO THE AREAS OF WORK. DISTURBANCE WITHIN THESE AREAS ARE CONTROLLED BY VARIOUS REGULATORY
AGENCIES. DISTURBANCE WITHIN THESE AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED TO THOSE AREAS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY COMPLETE THE
WORK.
4. WETAND AND RIPARIAN BUFFER AREAS EXIST ON THE ADJACENT SHORELINE AREAS. THESE AREAS SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED IN
ANY MANNER, UNLESS CONSTRUCTION IS DESIGNATED TO OCCUR WITHIN THESE AREAS.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND AS
SPECIFIED.
2. THE PANS DEPICT THE GENERAL INTENT OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING FEATURES
OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY ITEM DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE
RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION OR REP_ACED WITH NEW.
3. ADJACENT STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES MUST REMAIN IN OPERATION DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EXISTING ROADS SHALL
REMAIN OPEN AND ACCESSIBLE BY VEHICU AR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. IF ROADWAY CLOSURE IS REQUIRED, APPROVAL SHALL
BE SECURED FROM THE CONTRACTING OFFICER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE BARRICADES, LIGHTS, SIGNAGE AND OTHER
PROTECTIVE DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FENCING, BARRICADES OR OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES TO MAINTAIN A SECURED WORK AREA
AT ALL TIMES.
5. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION ON ANY STRUCTURES OR UTILITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE
EXISTING CONDITIONS OF ANY STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP A PLAN OF CONSTRUCTION THAT
ENSURES ALL ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETED IN A SAFE MANNER. PROVIDE ANY TEMPORARY SHORING, SHEETING OR SUPPORT
REQUIRED TO COMPLETE WORK IN A SAFE MANNER.
6. COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL STRUCTURE AND UTILITIES INDICATED, BOTH ABOVE GROUND AND BELOW GROUND.
7. ALL EXCAVATIONS CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH COMMON FILL, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,
SHALL BE GRADED TO CREATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE, AND SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT VEGETATION
PAN. GRAVEL AND PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION.
8. ALL EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHOWN SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES STARTING.
9. ANY FILL MATERIAL REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH THE FINISH GRADES SHOWN SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM A PROPERLY PERMITTED
BORROW PIT. ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF OF THE
GOVERNMENT PROPERTY.
10 IF DURING CONSTRUCTION, ANY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED THAT ARE SUSPECTED OF BEING CONTAMINATED, WORK SHALL CEASE
AND THE CONTRACTING OFFICER SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR RESOLUTION.
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE THE SERVICES
OF A PROFESSIONAL UTILITY LOCATE CONTRACTOR TO MARK ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE AREA OF WORK. UTILITY MARKINGS
SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
2. ALL UTILITY LINES TO REMAIN SHALL REMAIN ACTIVE AND SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
3. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR OR REPLACE, TO ORIGINAL CONDITION, ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS.
5. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH LOCATING, DISCONNECTING ABANDONING AND CAPPING OF UTILITY LINES SHALL BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
I, JOSEPH C. AVOLIS, PE, PLS , CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS
DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL GPS SURVEY
MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
WAS USED TO PERFORM THE SURVEY:
• CLASS OF SURVEY: CLASS A
• POSITIONAL ACCURACY: HORIZONTAL: 0.017'
• VERTICAL: 0.027'
• TYPE OF GPS FIELD PROCEDURE: NC CORS NETWORK VRS
• DATE(S) OF SURVEY: FEBRUARY 26, 2020
• DATUM/EPOCH: NAD83 & NAVD88
• PUBLISHED/FIXED-CONTROL USE: NC CORS VRS
• GEOID MODEL: GEOID 2012B
• COMBINED GRID FACTOR(S): 0.99989233
• UNITS: US SURVEY FEET
PROF ONAL LAND SURVEYOR
L-5308
LICENSE NUMBER
NOTE:
1. ALL FILL MATERIAL NEEDED TO EXECUTE THIS PROJECT MUST BE
OBTAINED FROM AN NCDEQ DEMLR-PERMITTED BORROW PIT.
CIVIL L
-GE\D
EXISTI \G
DESCIPTIO\
-W
A
X 5.00
-28
STORM DRAIN DROP INLET/MANHOLE
SEWER FORCE MAIN
STORM SEWER
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
CONCRETE
ASPHALT
GRAVEL
SURVEY CONTROL POINT
RIP -RAP DETACHED SILL
TURBIDI-Y CURTAIN
SPOT ELEVATION
TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
$- A
0
+25.7
28
ABBREVIATIONS
BLDG
EX.
LBS
MAX
MIN
0.C.
TIP
oo+y�
AEC
CAMA
BUILDING
EXISTING
POUNDS
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
ON CENTER
TYPICAL
AND
PLUS OR MINUS
PERCENT
CENTERLINE
AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT ACT
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
u)
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit
ly signe%L{11ltrld by iJoh
,....f... LI r'
.„.1
SEAL LI
LI
= 15738
•-2--204:- Si
.0.#1•• '�` N
i�y'V IK on/JillA" &k1
Avolis
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive. Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO
DATE
DES JKA
PM/DM
DRW MSP
G-K JCA
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
z
Q
0
0
z
0
0
C9
z
w
w
z_
C9
z
w
w
J_
0
LL
OO
0
Z
0
a
J
0
(—)
0
0
0
c
c
w
U
U.S. MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.:
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766731
D
C
B
A
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1
2
3
4
5
SHEET 02 F 29
G-002
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
re
a
d
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
A
3
SITE LOCATION PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 1000'
N
/1\
0
1000'
..........
..........
2000'
SCALE: 1" = 1000'
fi
S\
N
U
S
AREA 1 PROJECT AREA
�o
VE
o�% \ QP r5i`� e�j'yy o%
e,
HANCOCK CREEK
CLASS: SC;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-115
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27—(104)
75'x100' PROJECT
LAYDOWN AREA L.
PROJECT LAYDOWN AREA
NOT TO SCALE
N
AREA 2 PROJECT AREA
PROJECT LAYDOWN AREA
0
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit ly signed by Joh Avolis
�►�f 11
�_ � • Sg1� •�ry
• $EAt
r • 15738 —
co
■
1.
• 432-ite2a
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
z
J
Q
0
0
z
0
0
C9
z_
W
W
z_
C9
z
W
W_
J_
0
u_
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
SITE LOCATION PLAN
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. —
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAV-AC DRAWING NO.
12766732
SHEET 03
OF
29
G-003
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
~-GOLF COURSH-
BULKHEAD 3495
_
►. BLDG 4843
0
WOODED ti
BULKHEAD 3494
SILL ALIGNMENT POINT 'B'
N=442,662.52
E=2,637,145.06
WOODEDti
BULKHEAD
3493
AREA 1- OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 250'
RIP -AP SILL ALIGNMENT (A-3)
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S19°33'25"E
79.31
L2
S23'10'40"E
95.00
L3
S23'10'40"E
72.98
L4
S27'26'07"E
22.06
L5
S27°26'07"E
95.00
L6
S27°26'07"E
95.00
L7
S27'26'07"E
6.77
L8
S37'49'27"E
88.34
L9
S37'49'27"E
74.61
L10
S53'57'47"E
21.04
L11
S53°57'47"E
45.70
L12
S68'55'29"E
30.06
L13
S68°55'29"E
41.67
L14
N79°28'25"E
55.20
L15
S86°40'29'E
52.46
L16
S48°32' 10'E
45.15
L17
S48°32' 10'E
95.00
L18
S48°32' 10"E
51.33
L19
S51°05'19"E
43.69
L20
S51'05' 19"E
95.00
L21
S51°05'19"E
38.14
L22
S65°49'40"E
60.45
L23
S43°23'53"E
44.17
IP-AP SILL AL_IG\Iv
ENT (A-B)
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L24
S56'08'41 "E
51.41
L25
S56'08'41 "E
95.00
L26
S56'08'41 "E
56.11
L27
S60'43'55"E
38.96
L28
S60'43'55"E
95.00
L29
S60'43'55"E
95.00
L30
S60'43'55"E
56.55
L31
S63'07'05"E
38.47
L32
S6307'05"E
95.00
L33
S63°07'05"E
65.67
L34
S79'03'21 "E
30.12
L35
S79'03'21 "E
95.00
L36
S79'03'21"E
19.66
L37
S81'53'52"E
66.92
L38
S71'54' 19"E
95.00
L39
S71'54'19"E
36.06
L40
S75'31'57"E
58.99
L41
S75'31'57"E
46.07
L42
S83'32'17"E
49.16
L43
S83°32'17"E
92.06
L44
S83'32'17"E
56.50
L45
N84'58'02"E
38.96
L46
N84'58'02"E
14.08
IP-AP SILL ALIGNMENT (A-B)
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L47
S78°12'32"E
81.44
L48
S78°12'32"E
42.57
L49
S83°14'25"E
50.19
L50
N88°48'58"E
95.00
L51
N88°48'58"E
11.33
L52
S69°25'21 "E
84.39
L53
S69°25'21 "E
86.55
L54
S80°07'03"E
94.84
L55
S80°07'03"E
95.00
L56
S80°07'03"E
95.00
L57
S80°07'03"E
95.00
L58
S80°07'03"E
95.00
L59
S80°07'03"E
95.00
L60
S80°07'03"E
95.00
L61
S80°07'03"E
95.00
L62
S80°07'03"E
95.00
L63
S80°07'03"E
56.09
L64
N82°59'40"E
39.92
L65
N82°59'40"E
39.65
L66
N74°18'45"E
55.62
L67
N74°18'45"E
31.74
L68
S76°57'48"E
65.93
L69
S76°57'48"E
75.37
RIP -RAP SILL ALIGNMENT (A-B)
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L70
S83°10'17'E
74.26
L71
S83' 10' 17"E
55.25
L72
N73°31'36"E
30.00
L73
N73'31'36"E
69.26
L74
N56°14'33"E
9.96
L75
N5614'33"E
54.94
L76
S77' 12'34'E
43.45
L77
S77' 12'34"E
43.44
L78
N65'29'25"E
54.90
L79
NO1'40'40"E
34.65
L80
N76°02'41 "E
35.23
L81
S83'17'11"E
28.66
L82
S83'17'11"E
49.26
L83
N89'27'23"E
32.91
L84
N89'27'23"E
58.38
L85
S52'11'18"E
32.44
L86
S76'57'36"E
95.00
L87
S76'57'36"E
90.07
L88
N78°46'23"E
95.00
L89
N78°46'23"E
27.04
L90
S74°20'58"E
70.10
L91
S74°20'58"E
23.01
L92
S85°06'13"E
72.29
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
g
NOTE:
D SILL ALIGNMENT POINT 'A' ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A' D
N=444,206.09 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
E=2,630,257.37
SLOCUM CREEK
CLASS: SC;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-112
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
r
cn
LICENSE NO. C70706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digitly signed by Joh Avolis
►111 1 ri
44 08/ .SEAti
NEUSE RIVER I rs
•
5 7
CLASS: SB;Sw,NSW . �.�
2-20
C C INDEX: 27-(104) ��•QiyN�° p�l� �•�
!!!nf►11 totOx�
N
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
U
0
0
0
z
O
U
... C7
W
W
z
C�
z
w
w_
J
w
J
5 A Q�w A
zo z
RIP -RAP SILL ALIGNMENT (A-B)
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L93
S85'06'13"E
95.00
L94
S85'06'13"E
16.46
L95
S87'58'51 "E
78.56
L96
S87'58'51 "E
34.27
L97
N86°47'48"E
60.82
L98
N86°47'48"E
42.96
L99
N82°43'02"E
52.10
L100
N8743'021
26.22
L101
S8511'35"E
69.20
L102
S85°11'35"E
16.31
L103
N89°49'471
78.74
L104
N89°49'471
95.00
L105
N89°49'471
28.94
L106
S82'23'12"E
66.56
L107
N89°06'481
95.00
L108
N89°06'48"E
95.00
L109
N89°06'481
69.25
L110
N80°05'281
25.98
L111
N80°05'281
77.35
L112
N75°33'471
95.00
L113
N75°33'471
44.36
L114
N72' 17'36"E
35.68
L115
N72°17'361
44.13
RIP -RAP SILL ALIGNMENT (A-B)
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L116
S87°57'471
32.99
L117
S87°57'47"E
38.56
L118
S71°50'07"E
57.35
L119
S71'50'07"E
55.15
L120
N87'58'051
41.31
L121
N87'58105"E
62.51
L122
N72'32'471
33.27
L123
N7732'47"E
84.62
L124
S88'53'52"E
50.28
L125
S82'30'04"E
44.87
L126
S8230'04"E
71.53
L127
S88°51'42'E
23.58
L128
S88°51'42'E
67.11
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
vi
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
J
J
cc
O
Q
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. -
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766733
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
250' 500'
••••••....
••••••....
SCALE: 1 " = 250'
SHEET 04 OF
29
CS101
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
9'
re
o_
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
A
_ x -5.80
/ / ' J x\g 83\ \ -6.03
/
x1 i2. x/ 1 11 x�X1 -0.V .57 \ \33\ \
-1.41/ / I 1 3.1 5\ \ \\
x 56
I \
/ x 0.84 1 I \� \\
I x -048
I (0.00
x 0.95
1\I I r__,
I
1.14
SLOCUM CREEK
CLASS: SC;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-112
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
"-WOODED ti
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
AREA 1 - ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
\
\\\ \\ 6.27
\ \ \ \S
1.05 \ \ \
\ XNN A A\ \V \ Av�.76
x\5 �� N N \V A A \ \
1.19 N
\ \ x \2.66 N \� N \\ \\x 7.36
1.04
x 1.30 \ \ x\0.7 \ �N \ \
x 1.37 \ \ \N \N \ \ \
x 1.12 x 1\19 x 0.50 \ \ \ \ �\ \
x 1.81 \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ 6\ \
x-23.7 \
/ x L.29 x 1.39 \ X \.77 \ \ \ \ \
x 1.34 // \� x 1 5 ` � \\ \\ \ \ \\ \�
\� x 0.5 \ \ \
x2.46 \ \ \ \\ 2 �� \ \ \
1 \ x 0.65 N \\ \\ \
x 2.82 l x 148 \ \N \\ x�2.81\ \ \
\ \N \ \� x -1.'17 \ \ \\ \ \\
2.2 :3 \ \ ,\ N \x -0.26 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
1.88 \\\ \ \\ \ \
x 2.5�3 \ N\ 0.65 \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\\
N \ x 51 \ \ \ \ \
\\
x 2.68 . / x x 0.85 \\ \\\
\ x U.4i \ \ \ \ \
� x 1.77 N \ \ \ \ \\
\ \ \ \
\\� x 1`\48 \ \ \ \ x\ \
\ 2
6 x\\ .10 x\ \�.79 A1.60 \ \ \
1\23 \ \ \ \ \
\ \ 2.05 x 0.59 \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \
\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \u-,
\ \
\•
x -0.6Q \ \ \
\
\� \\ x \21Q 0.62 \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT x ` 222 \\ x .3./ N
\ N
\ \ \
\ \ \
x3.53\\ \ \
\ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \
\ \
I \ 1.x 9 x 0.68
\ x 2.7
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL) \
\ \ v
\
\x 2.95
gmktveek viAtkveek
0004**
"OA%
*04400.
efoop-
x\2.09 \ \
\ \
\ \ \
\ \ \
x2�.19 \
1 \ \
\ o
xf1.14 0.64 \
x
x 2.87
\
x\1.18x 0
x 2.6
\ \
\
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
SILL ALIGNMENT POINT 'A'
\ SEE SHEET CS101 FOR SILL ALIGNMENT
v TABLE OF BEARINGS AND DISTANCES
\ x \.32
x-1.62\\
0
TYP. SILL OPENING v
TOE OF SILL
x -1.41
look
VOOk TOP OF SILL
��0\��. 4�1�
0
x -1.58
x -1.66
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nat
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit
Avolis
111
i SEAL
t"..A:21-1420541
(1/7,A:.P.;0\;\
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
0
(79
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
CC
CC
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVRAC DRAWING NO.
12766734
A
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
20' 40'
MENNEMENNI
SCALE: 1" = 20'
OF
29
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIEDHFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
g
a
D
C
B
--*-WOODED ti
01
x\\ .09 \
\X 2.95
x 2.87
x 2.6
**•••:::•44
\ VS".
\ 1070:04.14
x -1.41
7::::::eeke 1/4
*0041004
l• kat V% I El
0.64 \ 7:10;
\ lie0t_efeClitty
�la_'°;>_-17
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
-CLEARED-
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
N
\
.�7
x .51
x 3.97
W
-"---WOODEDti
\
\
\
\
x 0.59 \
\ \
x 1.74 \
x 1.08
x -1.58
x -1.66
TYP. SILL OPENING
x -1..
X
x -1.37
\
\ \ \ x1\15
\
v v• xxi.124(
\ \
• \ MEAN SEA LEVEL \
\�3(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
xx 3.23 \
\
x -1.72
-1.27
NEUSE
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-004)
x -1.63 0
TOE OF SILL
TOP OF SILL
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -1.58
x -1.21
x -1.55
x -1.68
\ x -1.83
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
ri TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
20' 40'
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C707016
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
SEAL 5*
It•t.* :::2-57/ 311 :2118:
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
0
0
0
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
cc
Lti
cc
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO
12766735
SHEET 06 OF
29
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
A
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
uNcLAssinED//FoR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
a
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
g
D
C
B
•\
x 1.75 x `35
x\ 3.04
-WOODED -
\ x 0.72
x -1.10
Neeoveek
*004bataO1117-.00,,
\\
\O
\1\11 \
x\9> .80 \\
,\
\ \ x 0.51 \
\\
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
3-
X 3.02
x 2.71 \
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT-7
x -1.55
x -1.21
N x 1.49
x 2.13
5
x 2.48
x 2.74
N
•
x 2.43
x -1.68
x -1.39
x -2.07
x -1.83
0
TOE OF SILL
<9
x -2.06
O
TOP OF SILL
\ 141761
• 7
NN
N
Nx •�.N3
i
N
\ x 1.54 N
\
N\ \ �\ 2.89 \
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x 50 \
N \
\
. 7 x 2.93
• x\1.76
O
N
x -1.47
O
O
x -1.94
x -1.91
-1.02
•`�\
x -1 75 \N
Aee.“***00‘
t ,��0,�,0�0�/� ,00s`�jjj‘ x0.69 \Nx1.22
x -1.98
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
x -2.01
7 /
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
GOLF COURSE
2.43
x
3
x 1.66
No
x 1.83
x 1.76
x 1.22
x-205/
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
ri RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
n TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
11 01,tvt.trtke-O-4•001***6 e:‘
x 0.46
12
x -1.66
x -1.66
0000.00,
4
x -1.82
x -1.65
NN
x .26
x -1.87
x -1.52
x -1.59
0000410
AREA 1 - ENLARGED SITE PLAN
20' 40'
MENNEN. NMI
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C1-0711r/
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
SEAL
tikk-
/mil MO -
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
0
0
0
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
cc
Lti
cc
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO:
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766736
SHEET 07
OF
29
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIEDNFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
re
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
t
D
C
B
�06
\ x 0.71
x 1.44
x -1.52
\ x 083-x 0.92
x 1.20
1.60 I.
ix 2.19
*""-----WOODED ti
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN
BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x -1.41
x -1.78
x
\
xi .99 x 0.81 \
x 1.69 \\
28
x 2.87
x 1.79
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT � \
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -1.32
x -1.77
x -1.83
x 1.94
x -1.66
'ttatteteiele.:•eteleie:;:be:
SILL
\8 Nee4o 40
N
x -0.37 A00000‘
/100/`,0•00‘
\ 000,00000‘
N
1///•0••O•►
t••/`y0
1 `/•••,,•
Nle
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
x 2.88
x 3.15
x1.2-U
1.67
TOP OF SILL
_ x 0.51 N
x1\
1\
0.97
\x 1.93
x 2.72 \
x -1.91
x -1.68
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
x -1.92
x -1.29
x -1.51
TYP. SILL OPENING
i
•
I•►ss• x o.8� v
'•••►•,�j••/•�'
•\ N
••Otip•••► ''/\
�1•0/••'
0000.i�•�••••/•0. .
N /.•••Otak4e00 j••/•.
\ \ /*••,••••*•;••1, ;••/0**4`
Nx \26 \ `,/*•�•/••fteao•1,
/ .19 `0.•,•t�
\
0.95
\ \
1.47
0.01
x -1.54
x 0.81
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
111 RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -1.75
0.88
x 1.40
2.30
x -1.35
x -0.61
x -1.25
a60‘. ‘
x _g82 Nee.%::::::.....:
x -1.72
x 1.33
x -0.11
AREA 1 - ENLARGED SITE PLAN
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706 vs(
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Doigit tr:siyaieJo.h.i.,:s.volis
1, 42-2o
inns !IWO
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
0
(79
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
cc
Lu
cc
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVRAC DRAWING NO.
12766737
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
20'
40'
MN NMI
SCALE: 1" = 20'
OF
29
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIEDHFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
x -1.86
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
X -1.35
x -0.61
x-Q82
X 1.2
1.00 \
X 1.60
x -1.25
x -0.69
x -1.72
X 0.36 /,•'�� ;0006
•••••,•••,•,•••�•‘
Nov
x 1 06
X 1.19 \ \
X 1.33
47
x -0.11
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
-WOODED ti
\ X 3.66
x -0.55
1
x -1.64
0
X 0.78
0.88
O
x -0.37
\ \�\ X 0.84
X
X 1.47
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
AREA 1 - ENLARGED SITE PLAN
/
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
x -1.58
x 0.90
x -0.2
X 1.31 \\
x 1.79
x 2.69
\
X 3.54 N
x 4.59
x -1.55
x -0.43
x -1.63
►O!(0•••••••►•
7 ••�••**. **•••6.
', •t•C•�c`*•••j•••0 ft.
000**0*00****,
\ \ •` *Vey
•••►`,f
4.92
x 0.60
0.94
-0,52
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
3.50
x 0.84
0.96
X 1..43
X 2.53
L
x
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-004)
x -1.17
x -1.20
TOE OF SILL x -0.54
TOP OF SILL
00.0006.
Nils
x 2.57
1.87
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
111 TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -1.32
TYP. SILL OPENING
Of POWAVOU ‘ .
' 0400.04010040.044* 4
•
1.35
x 0.54
x -1.59
x -0.75
x 0.65
x -0.60
ol
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C1-076
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Clgsysign,;;;I:fis
SEAL
44;17):11171.16'110
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARcH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
cc
cc
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO:
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766738
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0 20'
40'
SHEET 09
OF
29
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
a
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
x -0.59
x -0.45
•*'O'..
0••••,
••••►0000
••••►%•
••••1.l,,
'•••**4)
`**••/�•�`;••�0••••/•►•.
•`•i•••*•.•!1•••*,
.••�••� ft*g•••�
<4` w•i•P!////;,'/ 4/ ,
7
x -1.32
x 0.70
x1.35 \
•
x 1.66
5-
x 4.63
x -0.93
-2,
x 0.54
\ �S
x -1.59
x -0.75
-0.94
x -0.60
0
�j�js•�•►c•••••b.x 4322
..••••►� 1•,•••000b.
`*0•••/�
.••••,
A `/••••'****•0••••••/.
'1•••1**0*•*•••01
�•�i
it
x
S/4
kW' 3
x 0.65
1.21
x 2.44
MEAN
(NORMAL
x 2.32
x 3.68
ZONE 1NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x
\
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
'-WOODED ti
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -0.60
x -0.61
SEA LEVEL
WATER LEVEL)
1.80
x 1.77
x
TYP. SILL OPENING x 0.72
TOE OF SILL
06► ft*Oe,,,► 0.9 6
`•�•/••**‘%*•/••••b•/►
(4 P ••�••gi�ii44'i�p4.*.,
ANT/ t•�•••••tiii
B
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
0
TOP OF SILL
x 1.55
• x
x
x 0.27
x 0.80
x
/.."*"��� _ x -0.86
1•••••. te,AtteeWeeeeeeeVteaWei
••••���� L35-
Vfteate
0.51 ��/�•�••••••••••�C•aSi
-0-
0.90
x 5.51
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
x -1.64
0
o
-0.80 x x -0.76
x -1.66
x -1.03
x -0.72
x -1.06
x 1.27
x 1.70
2.34
x 4.30N
x 0.56
x 0 87
x 1.88
x 4.25
5
x -1.75
x -1.83
x -1.54
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
▪ HP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
▪ TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -1.71
x -1.12
ittilix"Pf_efoZt6;41:11114111tellikt
L37
x 0.56
x 0.80
8.01
x 17.45
x 1\7.8r6
x 2.79
x 4.62
cP
30
x -1.19
x 0.36
x
x 1.73
EX. WOOD WAVE ATTENUATOR, TO REMAIN
2.92
x 6.71
x 1.85
711' ,m141:i: \----
5
/
x 0.30
x -1.15
x 1.83
x -1.89
•
x 0.62
x 5.66
x 6.59
AREA 1 - ENLARGED SITE PLAN
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C707016
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
°81d4i7.71%
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
cC
Lti
Cc
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO:
MAMMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766739
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
20'
40'
SHEET /0 OF 29
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
a
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1
A
1
8
8
D
C
B
x-1.71
x -1.19
x -1.27
x -1.15
%%%"")*Ault..._
`"Att%Wevo‘e**,4%,"*.teeee,
""4•4%*****sftvAt
x -1.42
0.36
x 0.30
x 1.1 x 0.73
x1.85
x 2.46
2.92_
5
- -6-
x 6.69
x 7.54
x 19.72
21.45 22'
\
x3�0-
x 4.48 „
x420
\72
x 6.74
--8____
x 8 1 7.51x
x\
0
x -2.37
\ O
x -1.14
/
O
x-1.08 /
/
44"4% "VeeteVe
" .4.0 feMeeeVeat*AtreVrav
x 0.62 \ \ ,0' ii ili!ili!
x -1.59
x -1.29
O
x -0.96
EX. WOOD WAVE ETTA NUATOR, TO REMAIN
▪ x0.8,0
x 0.72
x 5.66
x 6.59
x18.69
79\
x 19.74
x 19.45
x-2$03
GOLF COURSE HOLE #1
/ \ 2 GOLF COURSE 23.10 \
�� �
/ )
/ I
AREA 1 - ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
;-3
x 4.26
x 7.87
44
x 1.85
x 1,03
__?_<1.9911
x 2.58
\\� x 3.66' \\
-/-
20�
x 20.13 /
x 20.23 c'\,
x 3.63
x 4.81
•
x
O
ib
Stkatetiotetteli LCS "k"aiellitrdt atag
"Ate tteAttittetwitISO 070•Vittbali 111111
\
x -1.54 NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
x -1.26
O \
O
x -0.95
x -1.66
x -1.53
X>099
x -0.94
x Q 473
i7>) 0.79
x 1.84
2.29
x2.83
x5.75 \
\ \ ''''.--.-x 4.84
x 6.66 _ \ ____x\5.973�
x 6.41
„x 6 85
\�\ x7.64
12__1�'-7�7
/22--7
x 22.60
x21.56 x21�33
x7.17
x -0.93
L4 1
x 1.76
TOE OF SILL
x.1.91
x 2.51 -- -
30 ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT 2-x �6 _
x 2.50
x 0.31
Q&� x091-
x 3.68
x 6.55
-WOODED ti
x 1.71
x -1.92
x -1.20
x 0:9\
x -0.91
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -1.10
TOP OF SILL \ \
lareett
L43
VaroalreTtelftlfakkkeJL.52-2-212-21:14MMILVINVIVI
tallaeatate
prec•zetfctiatata
SILL PLANTING TYp
T3(7'
Rl
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
x 3.17 ` --
�Xrt03 - -
x 4.12 50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT,29
x 4.42
--x 6.95
x 5�
r
/ 7
J//x 2.1)/
/ /
•
6.74
x 4.31
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT J
x 0.70
• x .1.47
x 2.43
x 3.86
0
/
x271
x -1.39
x -1.69
x -1.08
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
▪ RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
▪ TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -1.67 x -1.62
x -1.51
TYP. SILL OPENING \
L44 \ \
re:::::::70migivai
:it Tar Ilealrearibitatiattlal
56
SILL PLANTING TYPE C
c_ i:(1 1 //
x 1.63
x -1.12
x -1.52
x 0.69
x -1.72
x -1.33
L47
x -1.31
SILL PLANTING TYPE C
x -1.14
x -1.51
x -2.31
x 1.78
7
L48
SILL PLANTING
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. ClZuNirr
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
larne
irg. SEAL
•„ 42-20 ; 4i7
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
cc
cc
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO:
MAMMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO
12766740
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0 20'
40'
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
uNcLAssinED//FoR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
a
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
-2.31
7
N
N
O
x -3.01
O/
-2
/
x -1.69
x -1.41
O
x -1.23
L48
ree*OVeee•V L49
legt-
!�!!l�l�����l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�!_ =�
\ \ SILL PLANTING TYPE CI
x -1.28
x -1.19
x -1.02
\x 2.63 •
x
x -1.82
x -1.70
x -1.44
x -1.31
O
x -1.32
x -1.06
O
x -1.60
x -1.35
x -1.28
L50
O
O
=1.44
x -1.35
x -1.16
x -1.27
wevo!!!!twe��ll�iti�l�C�sl�lc/=l�l�lA
'evo
,...■�im etrees�llll�l�l�l�!!;!;!:!:!:!!:!!!!%t
l;/:a!esei�illl.!-!_!_0e...--- -
00 = -
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
-W00DED -
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
N
x -0.30
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
x 2.12
x 1 0x-0.94
x 1.45
O
x -1.73
-1.53
x -1.5/
L51 -1.08
-1.10 r
CsteA;!:l=le
x 4.20
�5 x4.89
x 0.11�
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
/ INDEX: 27-(104)
152
x -0.26
► go. -lb-lb-.-.
• • .Agt• •
11 I EX. RIP -RAP . `�:
- - '`i"fo STABILIZATION:�`�ci��i•
�� �~ TO REMAIN ����•
77,4:45.1:1:.
4.04:•77.--*
x 6\50 x'3. 4�
x -1.98
x -1.69
x -1.62
x -1.60
x -1.28
TYP. SILL OPENING
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -1.85
x -1.67
x -1.66
x -1.29
Z53
_0
79
TOE OF SILL
x
x -1.99 --x 2.03
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
�2 TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -2.04
x -2.14
x -1.82 2,
x -1.91 x 93 9`
x -1.52
x -1.39
1.03
x -1.56
x -1.41
x -1.81
x -1.60
x -1.48
at t ittetWilita*
:::::::::%""*WeeeeweeeveT4
z,�.oetttwat
�i�� ,
x 13.70
x14.28 - x13.56
EX._ COMMUNICATIONS TOWER, TO REMAIN- -x 13.67-
/ / ��7� -19------
/X 19.15
71
/ 7
/ / / /X22. 6
/ /
/ z
/ x/275 / .25
-WOODED ti
TOP OF SILL
26
x -0.36
x 13.49
x -1.93
x -1.64
x -1.51
x -1.29
1:4:1 11: ZIPettew atell tfet;
BULKHEAD 3495
x 15.41
20- -x17.86-
---x-1895
EL.=25.94
N=442,626.475
E=2,632,896.2205 61
x 13.42
x -1.73
x -1.49
x 14.33
/81
17.95
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C70706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit. ly signed by Joh Avolis
' �i
Si
.s` ■ F.sS1p ". y
Y•
4 • SEAL '�
15738
■. 2-20 •
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/E
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
H
z
Q
0_
0
z
0
0
0
w
w
z
z
w
c/)
w
J
0
w
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO..
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766741
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
20'
. . . . . . . . . ■
..........
40'
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
SHEET 12 OF 29
CS 109
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
g
D
C
B
=1-9-8-
x -1.83
x -1.85
x -1.73
x -1.49
_ 1_
13-
O
-1-1 797 ---
x -1.91
x -1.64
x -1.57
x -1.55
-0.94x �L56,
O
x14.33 - -�!-
14.21
xi145
N16-
6.81 .
x 15.46
x 16.19
\x1195
--- x 17.79
19:20
3.76 x23.2'2- -
x 2444
x 25.31
I
- -x
0
. x 15.1-6-
O
GRASS 6.
-30' ZONE 1
x 17.32
0
x -2.09
x -2.54
O
x -2.00
x -1.96
x -0.87
30
x 13.66 x 13.68
15.05 15.37
X
x -2.16
x -1.73
O
0
x -1.42
ttt0 e -040,4%.014.00eeeeee•We •
x -0.34 ����••/��0��
• x 16.62
x -2.16
x -1.76
x -1.68
0
x -1.65
x -1.08
x 16729-
NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT - - -x _ 18.66
x 20.62_ -
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
235
x 25.08
241,5
x 22.41
x 20.57
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
sue
x 13.80
H6.00
0
x -2.13
x -1.90
x -1.82
x -1.62
1 - x-1.08
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
• s•�•�,�•��litteitetkilteteateal s • a row
TOE OF SILL
141-3.92- 15� -
- - x 16.85 - -16-
17
x18.22
20
------ x 2373--23--_
24:99- -24- - - - x23 991
-x-22702 -- - , i - 4.7�
-- "-23
/
r42nE -UGE
x 24.33 x 24.78
x 25.51
x 25.49
x 25.92 x 2x 26.05
x 25.64
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
D
N
•
x
x 24.71
-UGE -
x 25.72
x 25.70
0
x 25.55
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
i
x 25.91
BLDG 4843
- --xH2-24a7
x 23.4f---
14�
D-
-1.64
x TB,32-_--BULKHEAD 3495 �_---__
x
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -2.22
x -2.15
x -2.21
x -2.16
x -2.04
x -1.91
x -1.92
x -1.60
x -1.75
-x-1-7 07
x 18.50
x -1.63
x -1.29
TOP OF SILL
CO-tvr �� -ilk- 06 00.00•
i����•�att����..�--.ems
oweiplinceftwikesiakei
�**********t6***�.�...-_ems
x716-25- --
-----
-
x � -
x20.82
x 19.65
x 21.54
x�23_
x 26.34
25.64
25.56
xNS
x 25.64
1 -
X -2-6 CT
x 26.13
2�
x 25.58
x 26.17
x 26.16
11
\ _ x 2
7J \
x 26.05
x
- 13.65 --`
x 14.63
x -0.59
�ifrO�J ----- 14.�5_
x 21.73
x LL1
x 22� - - - -
x 24.74
x 26.29 �26�
GRASS ti
x 26.18
x -2.07
x -2.00
x -1.67
x -1.50
TYP. SILL OPENING
48
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
1❑ RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -2.47
x -1.57
x -1.40
x -1.17
L60���
�3
x -2.21
x -1.90
x -1.62
x -1.34
x
/
/
pra_ietolteZt;;;:to%itollet;v...7.;:t_oloZtlotem.").*_I
ii.iiiii://ii.iiiiiii;iiiiiiiii.ili'iiiii(1:11111
iiiiiiiiit-6/i 1-
""tt:46:******-0::::::`fto:**-*;;; '
11-..,.e.„7.1/(11:1-1/.11.611/51/1111iiii triltill."1"1111414111*00.101101141011%:40...atitillilIPI:r7..
x -2.25
x -1.87
x -1.56
•
18.84
x 25.63
x 25.62
x 25.60
x 25.57
x 21r0
x 25.82
x 25.85
25.93 x
TBM "IRS"
N=442,534.895
E=2,633,532.856
20'
40'
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTNITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARcH
FIRE PROTECTION
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
14.1
Lu
CD
Lu
cc
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO:
MAMMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766742
SHEET -13
OF 29
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIEDNFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
a
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
A
3
O
x -2.10
x -1.95
x -1.31
O
x -1.01
O
x -2.10
x -1.75
x -1.22
-1.00
x -0.80
1-`01.11/111nowiwV�- x -0,05
ip ;•*-
faviadt410000000000 rie-tealSztlea bitiOpettlibeil 14 HI I 11 11... .1 1:flitzTei .Lve
ae*C(ftttt•))*.ita%%%**WOVOVOI
x 0.15•
..-2,ze� h i
:OlI 4'ihhh'i!i
\1377 x 0.2 " ` x 0.66
•
x -2.25
x -1.87
x -1.56
x -1.14
x -2.14
x -1.71
x -1.24
x-1.03___--1------
/
L61-�
143_75
X�18�1�
x 23.67`
12
\`x- 5 02
x24.66
x 25.3,1
x 44.84
x 168 . N
7
-----BULKHEAD 3495 14,25 \
N
N N \
1.43
N x 13.4 1.30
N
x 1.43
x 1.14
/6'x 1 >\ )/NN 2.33
211.10 \ 407/6,\
7,9
2
x'2-3 31 �222.64
WOODED ti
x -1.20
O
x -2.05
x -1.77
x -1.12
x -1.07
x -1.07
i-- - L63
�, _ _ _ x -1.31 L64
lara4,0**1.1101 ire .141
orm
"SAVA" tel"Weeee0 •
•
x -1.40
x -1.22
x -1.19
x 1.14
3.88
' • • • • • ;1
111` a" 14
016
• 11111m, •
p41119111111
EX. RIP -RAP'
STABILIZATION
TO REMAIN •
_•••4IPS5:
►•I.* •••1.•1.;•�4
I-
J
x -0.29
x 1.09
4-
6 5
X-�1-9-
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -1.83
x -1.31
x -1.24
-1.35 x
------x-=1-99
x -1.17
x -0.81 \
l
=1,44 TOP OF SILL
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
TOE OF SILL
L66
0I/0e%e�� �j�i -1
�,,,eleeei,,�,••►,
x -0.35
0
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
x 1.41
2-
x 0.92
x 2.6
x A.80
x 2.49
x 3.52
x
x 0.41
x 2.20
x3.27
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x -2.67
- -1.96
x -1.57
x -1.56
x -1.29
x X226
x -2.99
x -1.64
x -1.64
�6� .o, tt��-- L68 x 1.50
•006
%**4"talteaVr**4.6.424.4.4"
•:•-• • s
*111
14 If
41.-.44.000001
4414104,00
•
x-gam
0.04
x 1.57--
x 2.48
x 3.79
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
x 4.57
x 1.32
-5�
x -1.46
x -1.31
x -1.93
r•selr;;;:;;;;;;;;;;;;;ll;it;' r 11,11)
ettillieetallatatetatttetetikedieft
x 0.60
x 1.25
x 2.52
x 0.25
x 1.22
x 0.62
x 1.26
x 1.72
x 2.49 •
x 2.59
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
111 RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
El TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
IYP. SILL OPENING
t4 .4tte 404.0.1"Vete0
1t1Lootueariz.-...21greircata it* e *a el
040,0"Weee•
x 2.77
x 1.86
•
N
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C707016
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Avolis
SEAL
teAtaiteN
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
cC
Lti
Cc
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766743
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
20' 40'
SHEET 14 OF 29
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIEDNFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
x -1.93
x -1.26
x -2.18
I
i illII�jijii�j
x -1.70
x -1.30
x -1.38
x -1.76
x -1.34
x -1.16
10 I t�ttl���ttttttttttt��t��t�tt,�ti�G��' `\\`\`\\\\\\\\\\\�\��I
,�,jjt�tttttt�t�t�t�t�tttttttt�ttt�er►
��/tttt��
x 2.52 -- 251.92
N
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
x 4.72
-WOODED -
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
x -2.51
x 23f
7
7
x -2.21
x -2.04
x -2.18
x -1.31
TOE OF SILL
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
x0.61 / x2..14
x 0.96 7
x -1.66
x -1.04
x 1.69
x 1.68
x -2.44
x -2.27
x -1.76
x -1.28
TYP. SILL OPENING- --1-
x 0.12
x 0.89
x 0.73
x 1.64
x -2.54
x -2.32
x -2.12
x -1.88
x -2.63
x -2.24
x -2.13
x -2.08
Iii
1 x -0.39
x -0.69
x 0.56 x 0.33
x0.55 x0.26
x 0.09
A n
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
1❑ RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
�2 TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit. ly signed by Johvolis
�. ,1►:%.z
11 �i
fss)s;
■ ..
I i
1578
2-20 • ,S
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERI NG
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
5/5
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
H
z
J
0
0
z
0
0
z
w
w
z
0
z
w
w
J
w
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
J
a_
4.1
cc
Q
w
Q
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO..
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766744
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
20' 40'
. . . . . . . . . ■
..........
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
SHEET 15
OF
29
CS112
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
x -2.63
O
0
x -2.19
L84
SeetWOWteritittettli
0.00.0.001.0
- 10400100000
0•0000004,N
x 0.69 .••1�S�r;'
•••A�•
•••r
x 0.26
x 0.98
x 1.88
.A. 5 x 2.27
2.00
x 04
x 0.99
x�.�,�
-WOODED -
x 1.06
=2,U
x -2.73
0
x -2.22
x -2.30
0••►►- , _ x -2.25
w�01••••••►.�,
`�att�o•••••
'/s'•••••••••1
0a••�•�••••••1•►:-ift tpee**•�
••/•,tte'©/0i�,•f•�Si: et
O
O
x -2.56
0
x -2.24
x 1.68
x 2.36
\
\
x 1.90
•
x 0.16
x -2.76
x -2.70
O
x -2.41
r-,
x-1.94 -
TYP. SILL OPENING
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
���•••••�•�//•►.1 `1 TOP OF SILL
,4:1 -
64."4"104%1 VA. it:
x 1.69 MEAN SEA LEVEL
x 1.76 (NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
x 1.8'1
/ ---
x 1.35 /
_
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x 2.51
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT -
x 2.90
x -0.29.---
x 0.56
x 1.13
2Th
0-,
18,
\ __,..x -17.b3
x 0.06
7
7
7
x 1.24
x 2.21
3.04
•
- 2.97
x -2.81
x -2.77
x -2.40
x _2.06 _ ----
TOE OF SILL
10
x 4.67
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -2.42
x -2.42
x -2.30
x 3.1
x 0.40
x 1.08
x 2.20
x -2.69
x
a -2.16
x -2.10
ie•/•t••1014*0*••••••0•00 ' 0
oa•i••tIo••ic•Z•�•�I� i:��'e%�W4.%0•400O ,
�� •aitntOOSO•••••►►ea'l •A••••••/►4.4.4****
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
n RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
n TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
i
4-
-0.03
x 0.51
x 1.12
x 1.76
x 3.38
x -2.75
x -2.32
x -2.12
-1.66 �91
x 0.27
x 0.15
18
x
x -2.81
x -2.31
x -2.12
x -0.17
x 1.13
1_94
x 3.61 _3- _
-WOODED ti
L92
x 0.32
/
/
3.04
•
x -2.81
x -2.28
--2
x -1.94
x 0.19
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
N
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C-0706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit. ly signed by Joh Avolis
�. ,1►t'� 11 SEAL
r 15
�i
.s` ■ F.sS1p ". y
S738
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
H
Z
Q
0
0
Z
0
0
0
Z_
w
w
Z_
Z
w
w
J
0
w
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO..
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766745
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
20'
. . . . . . . . . ■
..........
40'
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
SHEET 16 OF 29
CS113
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
g
D
C
B
J.32
x 0.80
--2
x -2.81
x -2.28
0
0
x -1.94
Uri Verereell Won .
.
reel Rea
x -2.79
x -2.27
0
x\1�8
x -1.65
x 0.19
-0
0
x 0.46
J1.87---2- �x 1.79
7
7
7
X 3.04
- _3-
x 0.10
),
-- \ x 2.89 /
`----4 x \ xZT
/
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'
/
0
x -2.67
x -2.39
x -2.10
0
O
x -2.63
x -2.20
iO
x -1.93
x -1.60
1.1-94.44.4imei
L95
fttt`-�_j-j������•��s�s�s�sssttt���si
002
x 0.77 x 0.40
x 1.20
x 1.72
N
x
x 1.03
x 1.57
"-WOODED ti
x 0.14
x 0.51
x 71
0
x -2.65
x -2.22
--------2--------
0
x -1.76
x -1.59
x -2.62
x -1.44
TYP. SILL OPENING
L96 L97 , _-���I
i�����s'G"ev:i'sus=s�s`��������A�f�l,,�A�s���i
..`._s._a_.`_..__s_t_�iiitti_��"��:vs�-a�_c__� =�
ogi.awizramoraree
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
x 0.76
x 0.94
x 1.56
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
TOP OFS
i
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -2.4-
x -1.97
i
i
i
x -1.76
x -1.44
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
x -2.60
x -2.15
x -1.81
x -1.46
x -2.59
x -2.17
x -1.85
x -1.51
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
1❑ RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
n TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -1.18 , 'L100 x -04 _ L101
-sssssss�i,�sssoe:ssssss
ILL - - - - _��� liI'II'II I I t�����_t�'•C "--�-�-1-s_s_s_s_�_�--�_�-s
L98--•��-�.�;S11:
s��t��•��•i!Illll\_l,l, l� ��ir���r������.�'�����.----�_s
111.1.77
ss�„�,i_�5����11411x
���sss�s����e���i��� =��bifttleite��� sss_s�•��00_�i� �.ss����-�_�_e� �ssss��ss��1ta��..��G�a♦_.-���� ��t \\\\QH-w ������sss
��� - 0.41
-0�
x 1.26
x 1.02
-
TOE OF SILL
x 0.38 x0.13
x 0.94
BULKHEAD 3494
TO REMAIN - NO WORK
/
x 1.47
'x1.77
/
x 0.24
/
x 0.40
x 1.06
0
x 0.76
-2-\
x 1.66
EX. STEEL STAIRS
TO REMAIN - NO WORK
x 0.47
x 0.82
-x 1.98-
x 1.60
x -2.52
x -2.25
x -1.68
0
L102L103
iso*likeDaszeemes-a�s-sus-s-�m
sssamphiliammeem-camwmvevrawear.mw
loWe,,��i���i�,,�,ss,�,��i���i�•�,/,ss,����i
0-
.07
x 0.44
x 0.98
x 1.08
.x
-2-----------------
x 2.15
GRASS ti
x 2.52
-WOODED ti
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C70706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit. ly signed by Joh Avolis
�. ►t'� 11
.s` ■ F.sS1p ".
• SEAL4
15738
2-20 •
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/E
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
z
0
0
z
0
0
z_
w
w
z
z
w
w
J
0
w
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
J
a_
cc
Q
Q
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.:
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766746
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0 20'
40'
.........I
••••••....
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
SHEET 17
OF
29
CS114
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
a
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
x -2.59
x -2.06
x -1.84
x -1.48
L103
x -2.94
x -2.39
0
x -1.90
L104
O
x -2.88
x -2.06
x -1.52
glagilaeggiel I
x 0.44
x 0.98
s � - 7
♦i�i���,,,,ii�i�i�����• ��,,�,��i�i�i���`�,/,�,�tittte
-0
x 0.65
x 1.42
x 1.86 •
-WOODED ti
0 04
x 0.49
x 1.00
1.64
x 2q7
BULKHEAD 3494
TO REMAIN - NO WORK
2
x 2.2-
-3---
O
L105
0
O
x -2.97
x -2.28
x -1.78
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
O
x -2.07
x -1.77
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x-3.60--------3-----
X-2.87
x -2.29
x -1.89
x -1.92
x -1.68
�!�•i��-��_���_�����-,_,_,�•• TYP.:ILOPENING TOE OF SILL TOP OF SILL
1 44 L06x -1.79
•
iii �������-���� •�
• • L107
iii !� �••••�♦��� ---Elie � 41l4i! 1 //� ����� ��•�� ii/i/�/-//iii%
/,,,-�-,-,.,///,,,,,•• 04141���i �_,!•' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �i��•-���i.,�,�,-/��i�.�,�,/��i�.�
�-/-/-/%/�/�///•/•/•/ �� � IIIIIIII ����-_� ��---__ �--_���•�S--��
��� ///////'/'/4 1,1 i;,'��j!//•/•/////%��/i/i/./W/W/W/�•eeirei/�/�•��/i/CG.
x 0.21
-xx 0.24
x 1.14
x 1.71
MEAN SEA LEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
x 1.00
x 1.46
2
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x244
GRASS
0-
x 0.84
x2.25 xx340 �x339x35rx 46
x
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
x 0.76
x 1.17
x 1.52
1.76
---- x 2.28 ----
x 3.40
x -2.86
re&T4e)&T4itT4Sit
L108
* 4) 40 110eChafo-
<-.84
x 4.33
x 0.09
x 0.68
x 1.19
x 1.72
x 0.55
x 0.68
x 0.86
x 1.35
x 0.06
---- 189- ------ x 1_75 --
x 2.58
----------x 2.85 _____ ----- x 3.16
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
1❑ RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -2.57
x -2.40
x -2.23
x -1.95
x -1.66
x -1.76
L109 �"11i r ////� -tte
�• • ova _
111111!!!!!!1111!!!!!!Iteek -� iii/�-
gnowlives
eirews
VS
,,,�� ��•Gi �.�-•�
/,/���i/�0.`i'j esoa/�/i`t**.a,i/�/./iea�
x 0.64
x 1.10
x 4.08
x 3.62.
x 4.37
-WOODED ti
x 1.50
x 1.31
x 1.83
x 2.38
x 0.22
x 0.70
x 0.94
x 1.39
-0
--- x 1.69 ___ --
x 0.25
x 0.75
x 0.91
x 1.38
x 1.84 -
x '1.65
x 2.19
x 0.66
x 0.91
x 1.48
x 1.93
x 2.42
x 2.56
x 2.85 - X286
-------3- ��x�.6Z=--
x 3.40
x 3.82 x 3.83
-------4----- x 4.11
x 4.52 x 4.66,
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
N
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C70706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit. ly signed bit Joh Avolis
�. ,1►t'� 11 �i
.4`■•F.sS1p .y.
4
ti
r •
15738 =
2-20 •
SEAL
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/E
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0_
Z
0
0
Z
0
0
0
w
w
z
z
w
w
J
0
w
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
Q
a_
cc
Q
w
Q
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. -
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766747
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
20' 40'
.........I
..........
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
SHEET 18 OF
29
CS115
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
g
f
D
C
B
x -2.57
x -2.40
O
O
x -2.23
O ------2-----
-
x -1.66
x -1.87
x -1.51
1�'1.1 il.
p
r••- --���.
-�--���sa�a�a�a_a�at�t�a�a��a�a�a�-
0.25
x 0.75
x 0.91
x 1.38
x 1.84
x '1.65
x 2.19
-e00
x 0.66
x 0.91
x 1.48
x 1.93
x 92�
x 2.42
-
--
x25 -
x 3.40
x 4.11
x 3.81------
x 4.80
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
x 0.82
x 0.96
x -2.42
0
x 1.98
0
O
x -1.3.
/ O
TOE OF SILL
x -2.51
x -1.95
TOP OF SILL L115
x TYP. SILL OPENING 13 ��a!!!►i���s�!i�l� ` i`i``
x -1.47 ,�aaaa��- ►il��l��a
•fit!! 1- ��� � !!►�
-�!; ,et,��tstoe �l��l;;;;!!`�a��� /
limo! �!!► i ��.r!d &tt. -
-�Faaaar►i-��Cs�raaaar� �
:Hoe:,
ata!����=/aaaa/�-
..�aa7aitoore
Carri*/!!.eott•
00.0-*•sari.- x�.08•'` ,l•
l�,,' x x 11.� 4
x U.b4 x 1.64 - _ 2�9
/ MEAN SEA LEVEL �63-------- -2� 2x�.8� -
x232
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL) x 3.40
x0.40 2�3 x2.29.
x 1,5'5 - -3____
x07097 /, x2.5�12.75 jz
3,98- - - _
x 1.22 � ��,�2/4 4
---------x 2.42 / �
x 1.70
x 2.55
x 3.05
-WOODED --
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
N
/85 x 2,41
x 2.67 7
7 x
i
x 2:8'7
/
/
x 3.64/
x4.72/----- -
\1 •
/)A38
-0
x 5.38
3.9,
x 3.60 5--
-_2_
x 0.84
x 1.35
x 3.90
•
-0.45
x 0.89
x 1.20
x' 2.67
x 3.23
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
L116
x 0.94
x 1 96 1.99
x -2.92
x -2.65
x -2.61
x -2.41
x -1.91
-2.00
7
L117
!!!!!!!!!!sleeve. ,
,a.,t_a��_t_s_1**••.•aaaaaa � �
�fiatti� ���L_�� ,,�� 18
wc�ictsata � �, ,
�aeea��s��,+ss�,aaaa�►�,
�*a,�attt%7 4'"at�tt•
��t�a�0aaat�����c��/
�t,Qaaaac►i,
7
7
7
7
x 0.18
x 0.76
x 1.16
x 0.69
x 1.03
- 7 2.04
x 1 , - - - - -x 1.91
x2.42
x 2.52
x324'
x 0.75
x 0.79
x 1.71
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x 3.65
x 3.38
7
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
II RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
�2 TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
7
7
7
7
7
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -2.76
x -2.50
x -2.29
x -2.19
x -2.44
x -2.31
:aaali
a�arl-b2.4.t
x 077207.70.0"17
0Waatat
-
x 1.06
x 1.64
x 1.56
.90.
x 2.50
3,- _ 2.94
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
x 3,79
1
1
x 0.18
x 0.83
x 11.26
2-
x 0.82
x 1.18
x 1.15
x 1.79
2g1,� x 1.82
x -2.93
x -2.88
x -2.10
L121
-_r..•,-a-a-aa�aa�a�a�a�cree
����aaaC-�
_�_� �::ijj���a
sa�aeekatgtt-tG`a....-
x 0.41
x 0.65
x 1.10
x 1.50
. x 2.12 x.1.93 x 1.68
- --------
x 2.35
x 2.46
2
x 2.44
x 2.49
x 3.75
-WOODED ti
0 20'
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
.•••••••••
40'
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
x 2.42
x 2.>� -3-
x 3.84
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C-0706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit.: signed by John-KAvolis
I II
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/E
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
H
z
0_
0
z
0
0
0
w
w
z
z
w
w
J
0
w
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. -
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766748
SHEET 19
OF
29
CS116
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
d
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
g
D
C
i
B
-2.93
x -2.88
x -2.59
0
O
O
O
x -2.61
Ass
0
x -2.54
IIII,II,I
x -2.10 z
z��`�j
I
e�� \-�tx 2.25 I II III I li'I iilt�
IietetterAteS**"
so-
2-
/
.I�1• 1 • :::• / x 0.69
0.83
e "Wire*" Wee.' twat* ow
t•ibirAt_e!. -0.33
x 0.41
x 0.65
x 1.10
x 1.50
x 1.68
1.73
-x1,91
--2--_/
x2.43 x2.13
x 2.93 -
x 0.64
x 1.08
x 0.95
x 1.33
x 1.86//
/ x 2.30
x2.42 x2.77•
2.��-3 x 3.10
x 3.84
-WOODED -
0
x -2.74
x -2.67
x -2.10
L124
0
TOE OF SILL -
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
L125
-��� -�, t�•�••• II II II II II II Ij
i.11lll
I11111,
x -2.01
-2.16
x 5
x 0.75
x 1.17
x 0.99
x 1.23 --
2.30
•
x 0.55
x 0>63.25
x 1.11
x 2.24
x 2.94
/
/ 0' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
TOP OF SILL
x x01548
j x 2.27 -
x 2.58
•x 2.47
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -2.60
x-297-
x -2.37
x -3.10
-- 3
x -2.91
x-3(14_ --- x-2.98
x -2.85
EX. WOOD WAVE ATTENUATOR, TO REMAIN
-2.14 x -2.66 SILL ALIGNMENT POINT 'B'
-2.28 x -2.40
TYP. SILL OPENING
Verd u, 1V•126
/11
tp"V-ltWiteTaael*r:a**astft*
x -L127
•
.V1.114_.4P10"A• t"•t
tP
x 0.66 ----0---.
x 0.96 �/�
0
MEAN SEA LEVEL-
x 0.42
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
i
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT/
l
x 2.46
2.22
-0.36 x -0.37
EX.
COASTAL VEGETATION
x 1.05
x 1.73
x 2.29 - --
x 2.43
2
1
*DO NOT DISTURB*
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
1❑ RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
SEE SHEET CS101 FOR SILL ALIGNMENT--
TABLE OF BEARINGS AND DISTANCES
x-2.48 /
--2-
-2.25
x -2.45
x -1.32
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
--•�jTj�•�•�•��RiPT'•-•'•�j�•�•�Mi y � 41 aW?D �a" .- Z.Z..=��%. a Ze d; 5 l� egegegejejejejeje
ek•dka i••••-e••ea grattlAk?•I•?••i?•/1•?•?•?•?.?.?.?•?•?•?•?•?•?•?•?•?•,00:1P•?•?JI
•�� •0e••C'�� z I•l.i1`ei0g•EX. RIP -RAP �;�••W.100 -abwagdalAIeg0.0.0.0.P.�� •a Osegei 0. ••G01JOejt
�-6#V4?Vilit?.l??°6
• •s•s•-•-•-•-•A..Ni •-•-•-•,_ STABILIZATION •4 •• -•,
.4g, AP ?=?=?=?=?=?=?=?=?=?=?�'�• TO REMAIN ?;,?:?:'� "+? 04?
l►Y�?????4?1???????li?,?��ll►�?2??�(I �?�?`,?-??'?aIta�l`
+••••••••••••••••••••••••O�••••••••••• • • '• -• •_ ?o • •-4)..••••.•..•E
'Y
0
I�I�I�I.I�II.I.I�I���I:I�Iole��h1?aC�rI�?.��?�?aIVI�ItY? ? Y?GO
,'-�
10-?-?-?-?-0A1P?-?�5�-?i?•?•?•?•?•?`--r...-4*.ftsvoi-4-1007.5.1.•.•.rmoRcoaragam-gair
x
x 2.39
x 249//
X 3 08
-WOODED ti
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 '= 20'
N
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
u)
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT:19028-P2
Digitly signed by JohryK Avolis
0111111,
5.(7::;
SEAL
+ 1527320
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23484
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
AYE
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA
DRW MSP
C-K JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
1-
z
J
0
0
z
0
z
w
w
z
c9
z
w
w
J
LL
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
11.1
0
0
cc
w
Q
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. -
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766749
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
20' 40'
.........I
.••••••...
SCALE: 1” = 20'
SHEET 20
29
CS117
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
a
d
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
A
x -2.98
x -2.78
x -2.15
-2.45
MEAN SEA LEVEL
x -2.49
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL) \\
�." -I " • • • • • • •
•Ai-1•C�—& Tw=�I-,l 4 ••••I3�c� � ,.
0 0 0
• I I I I I I I I 14/ • i v
•�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�•�• �1teAl tOT •k
40.
M.
edg
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. : : : :
o•-•-•!•-•-••.4•-•-•-•-•.• • • •�A,A
...
at "O EX. RIP -RAP ;V.:. : : : elm
ML
ei,.STABILIZATION e•-• •-�-o -
�%ks , TO REMAINv �;t,�.
J_
antosjostoseozotesoutu
•...•...•...•.•"• C�...•...•...•...•...•...1
• x• •• 41• R• 41• 41• 41• 41• 0,• 0,• 0,• 0,•
_..0*.....................
• •0P• • • • • • • • • • ••
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
•.... ...•...•.•.•.•t�.pi
-W00DED -
x -1.23
x -2.95
x -2.90_
x -3.08
x -2.91
x -2.81
BULKHEAD 3493
TO REMAIN - NO WORK
GRASS ti
30 ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
"- 50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
l
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
NO WORK, THIS SHEET
—WOODED ti
GRASS ti
AREA 1- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
N
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digitly signed by Joh Avolis
1L{1•
�1+1tr j� It
,:
SEAL
r.
..
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/5
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA
DRW MSP
C-K JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
H
z
J
0_
0
z
0
0
C9
z_
w
w
z
c9
z
w
w
J
0
LL
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
O
0
Cc
w
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. —
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766750
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1
2
3
4
0
20'
40'
.........I
.••••••...
SCALE: 1" = 20'
5
SHEET 21
29
CS118
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
re
a
d
7
t
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
-WOODED ti
SILL ALIGNMENT POINT 'A'
N=441,375.40
E=2,641,204.46
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
RIP -RAP SILL ALIGNMENT (A-B)
L129
S60°34'23'E
56.40
L130
S64°08' 15'E
30.80
L131
S64°08' 15"E
61.26
L132
S46°09'05"E
34.83
L133
S46°09'05"E
95.00
L134
S46°09'05"E
84.70
L135
S60°22'22"E
86.75
L136
S60°22'22"E
14.77
L137
S72'40'56"E
80.51
L138
S7240'56"E
45.56
L139
S62°50'21 "E
49.79
L140
S62°50'21 "E
95.00
L141
S62°50'21"E
45.27
L142
S42°43'02"E
43.77
L143
S60°47'21 "E
95.00
L144
S60°47'21 "E
90.76
L145
S60°47'21 "E
17.91
L146
S68°29'23"E
77.22
L147
S68°29'23"E
72.00
L148
S58°47'34"E
23.25
L149
S58°47'341
78.60
L150
S62°16'44"E
95.00
L151
S62°16'44"E
67.93
L152
S51°14'57"E
27.43
L153
S51°14'57"E
95.00
L154
S51°14'57"E
95.00
L155
S51°14'57"E
95.00
L156
S51°14'57"E
50.80
L157
S54°21'18"E
44.23
L158
S54°21'18"E
95.00
L159
S54°21'18'E
26.15
L160
S63°39' 12"E
69.10
L161
S63°39'12'E
59.19
00w
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nat
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit ly signed Joh Avolis
.t,jtl 1 it/
SEAL
8
C lrryN�' py�k �C
'-WOODED ti
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FGR COMMANDER NAVFAC
DES JKA
DRW MSP
K JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
a Q
SILL ALIGNMENT POINT 'B'
N=440,288.93 Z "
E=2,642,979.12
z
Q
0
0
z
q O
W
W
W
/ Wu]
F-
U
A HANCOCK CREEK z o Z A
BLDG 1009
CLASS: SC;Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-115
AREA 2 - OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 150'
0
150' 300'
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
AREA 2 - OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCALE: AS NOTED
E'FOJEC- NO.: -
VAXVO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVrAC DRAWING NO.
12766751
SIIEET 22 OF
29
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
.........I
••••••....
SCALE: 1" = 150'
CS119
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
x 1.72
x 2.38
• x 2�37
EX. METAL STAIRS, TO REMAIN
x 3.53
0.83
AREA 2- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
1.04
x -0.40
x
\ \ X
\ \
\ \
x1.42x0.89 X
N
�0.86
x 1.44
).23
1
x -2.84
x -2.75
x -2.60
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
SILL ALIGNMENT POINT 'A'
SEE SHEET CS119 FOR SILL ALIGNMENT
TABLE OF BEARINGS AND DISTANCES
ttitIOSVIS
We 400
x -2.40
05
2.50
x 2.57
BULKHEAD 3488
TO REMAIN - NO WORK
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-004)
x -2.55
0.84
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL),
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
0.17
0.83 X
62
x -2.73
IYP. SILL OPENING
x
-0.04
1.02
-0.50
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x -2.72
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITMS-THIS SHEET:
n RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
n TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
TOE OF SILL
TOP OF SILL
-0.17
0.97
2.62 \ x -0.76
0 20'
x -2.69
40'
x -2.92
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C1-076
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
WI
Cie
SEAL
15738
*. 42-20 .
!nun tolo-
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARcH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
LLI
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766752
SHEET 23 OF
29
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
x'\2.48
0
a
a
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
B
x -2.72
\
N
\
N
\
N
\ \x 0.88 I
\ `
\ N
O \
x 2.r \7
\ N0.95
\ N
\ N
\1.97 N
I
II �
2.38\
x
\
\
N
N
\
\
x 1.98
-0.17
x 0.53
N
\ \ \ 0.97 \
\ \
\ \
v\1.99 N
\ \
n cn \
MEAN SEA LEVEL
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
AREA 2- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
_/
'A\ 3
\\
x -2.92
x -2.69
TYP. SILL OPENING
x -1.66
x -0.76
✓ �
x0.48
TOE OF SILL
77
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
SCALE: 1" = 20'
"-WOODED -
N
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
TOP OF SILL
x
\ x 0.78
\ \ x 0.51
\
x 2.29
x 1.79
\ \
,.94
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -2.63
x -2.60
x -2.23
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
x -2.75
Si<< pGgNNI�����:ci
_ IYpF B
x 1.32 N
•m.*••o•o•c* 3
•o••••••Z••o•o•••••o••eo�
'&•o•••••••o•••••••••••o••••••Y•
x -2.13
x -2.34
1.138
►o•o•••••••••••••••••••o•,s4'1••••i• 0
0 0 0•.= o 0 0 0 = • • � � • • ��
I=I l l l�►4yl .... 0iOi �tit�`s�i� k'c
•o•I.•I.•I.•o• o•�•�•�•�•••!^rleoir• '•4•co•o• o
•-------------aetoai teeb
r►
ce► .44 -$00.
-:ip4t*.•040,V' :%•A4_0_•***_1*_-- *. 0o•.1e1--4.0-9*.1-08*
v.
79 �F- ..,.,Cw///%/j
/,//,,,
i► �i�i�i�i�i�i�i��1�.1�i�i:�i�i�.
ono o 0
P EX. RIP -RAP
STABILIZATION
TO REMAIN
o- o-
- at - - - - - - • - - •
L xo./p
NC 'p
F
x -2.54
x 0.68
� i i1 • 4.. - - - - - - C
�:���o�������������tetvi���
`--.on• • • • • Oily � ,
Esw�� * # In• 20b0A,
44.04 igi=ik` 0.72 ON
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
n RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
n TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -2.77
�WOODED��
-2
0.97
x -2.38
i/ jij% j,jY/'-
• ‘ 4, .t, 040,0 taw*,tr
Aglow 0 ob.
*#••beeasesotobei,w
iii
0.73 \ ��.000 00 a•�`
VII 'We
x -0.54 Nww- � i
NCO 00.
..kj $.0 v
x 0.78\ �����rj//i,
x -2.23
\2\
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
LICENSE NO. C-0706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit. ly signed by JohryKAvolis
►t1_ 11s "►�ri
foSSId.P 1."
ti
15738
� 2-20
SEAL
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
z
J
0_
0
z
0
0
z
w
w
z
z
w
w
J
u_
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. -
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766753
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
0
20' 40'
.........I
••••••....
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
SHEET 24 OF
29
CS121
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
x -1.74 N
'-0.67
).05
ab
11711,4 be. 1111 wit iv
•tea- i,
rx401010101010104101
i • •
x 0.68
-0.94 x
�0.03
x 0.69
x -2.77
x -2.38
x-1.89\�
>0.73
_; 010-.:.:.:.:.: 410 .gamy
Y•�•'OP • 'WO 'OP • 'OP • 'OP •�i��t0'i
-WOODED
AREA 2- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
V49c4/-0.54
0 .02 '°F
x 0.78\
x0 720
� t EX. RIP -RAP d
moo! STABILIZATION
• TO REMAIN e
x -2.23
-1.65
SCALE: 1" = 20'
• • • sw
er �. 1 •
0 iIiN mo•*‘,
•. •�'gr. vs.. vs.. vs.. eP,Sette fir
5472
N
x -0.94
-0.26
x0.56✓
70
N A x -2.07
4 'AO Oa Oa Cjilej
• • • • • • 'ram
b
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
x -2.21 0
-2.08
TYP. SILL OPENING
1\ 1 x -0.69
`x -0.14
0.81
4tI• I•I•Im Q
-• Avo-• -• -ttoututt • -•-•=• *-i
I st0st.N.4.•O0
pea` - • -• -• -• -• �• '•�
'4.$44
A.
_-• vs. • vs. •_-•vs. • vs. •vs. I/
610=0=0=0=1 =� 5 /5/ 12
2.63
3 4.10
x 4..49\\
\ \
\ \
x
x�1 47
x 1.24
-2�
TOE OF SILL
Vesteogiviste.4
x`2 ,.
0.92 \
\
2<11 \�
N
x 2.33
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
N
0
x 2.05
1799
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
TOP OF SILL
x -1.41
N /
x 3.20 4�
=225172
MEAN SEA LEVEL
'Q7_(NORMAL WATER LEVEL)
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITMS-THIS SHEET:
n RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
n TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -3.22
44.46.*%:;:tili:••\:-
ett:51:**•::::•••:
-vtotoetze6t,,...‘
x 2.16
x 3.62
0.83
N N
V1:111,11:ttlt NN
x700170007440::::••
0
41/0
20' 40'
.17
OWN 0
P440-
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C707016
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
I ID
tikk-
412_57328a
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
0
0
0
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766754
SHEET 25 OF 29
CS122
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIEDNFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
x -2.35
wir es*
'>c,1�WZ,.0 t,N WOO
\ N ` x\1.99
x 0.75
0.83
-WOODED
x -2.64
x -2.41
x -1.79 \
x N�NG
x 0.`Ja
x0.60\ �AFc
\ \
'-1Q3
2.00
x 2.34
x 4.11
N
AREA 2- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
x 0.40
x3 2.55
x -2.53
x =1-99
x -2.45
0;;;;I::0:1;esoatteit:*;*
x figs, / r/0
x 25
>
x.
x -1.27
\ x 0.65
\\
x 2.46
0.94
x -2.65
x-1.81\
\ \
3
\\ x 3'. \ \
\ \
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x 4.20\
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
75' CAMA AEC LIMIT
titittio
mil. 40•44C��0,0,`,.4 -1.67 x
....ztte.ittil0.47;:••••••*. it 74: .
NC 0.0.' -".,*�ose•i'Ni,
,- \ jsf
�1�i11
\
\< 0.88
x1.7N
x\3.3
TYP. SILL OPENING
•
x 3.29 \
47\
x -2.96
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
N0
x -1.78
x -2.71
1****** vsecoo,:•••:067
*** TOE OF SILL
�\__
��� 1.50
TOP OF SILL
sees
.40itletos* a �1S
`C,,wO,�
O x 1.44 O�W���VOW0 4.1.60
\ \ tc
MEAN SEA LEVEL - \
(NORMAL WATER LEVEL) ` \ 1012
N \
\ \
�� 0.80
x
-WOODED ti
N2\07
x
x 1.81 \� \
Y
-2.02
`\1.04
\ \ x 1.841
\ l
x 2.49 N
x -2.49
1
\ \ x -2.10
x -1.66
x 0.88
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
n RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
n TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -2.86
x -2.09
/
0
x -2.75
20' 40'
x -2.21
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
:SE SAILC:14#1
tikk-
nun: oi./1/
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES took IDRw MSP
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
0
0
0
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO..
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO
12766755
SHEET 26 OF
29
CS123
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIEDNFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
D
C
. x 2.60 \
x 3
GRASS ti
AREA 2- ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
0.95
x 1.22\
N
x -1.32
\ x0.95 N.
1.94
\
x 2.57
x -1.38
x -0.78
0.98
x 1.79 N
x -1.51
30' ZONE 1 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
50' ZONE 2 NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT
x -2,09
x -2.45
x -2.20
TYP. SILL OPENING
x -1.72
TOE OF SILL
05
\
-WOODED ti
x -2.05
\
x 0.63
NEUSE RIVER
CLASS: SB; Sw,NSW
INDEX: 27-(104)
TOP OF SILL
x -2.13
x 4 \/ • x 2.50
GRASS ti
NOTE:
ALL SILLS ARE PLANTING TYPE 'A'
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN
x -2.67
x -2.38
x -2.30
x -1.81 \\
�4.72
\\x6.50-�
x 7 3
x -2.90
//. x-1.72N
x
x 0,83
x 5.46
x 6.84
x 7.1\
x 7.70
x 8.42 \\
x -2.73
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOCATION AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCANNING THE AREA OF WORK
TO IDENTIFY TO HIS OWN SATISFACTION THE EXTENT OF UTILITIES PRESENT
INCLUDING THE UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE PRESENT, THOSE NOT SHOWN, AND
THOSE SHOWN TO BE IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL
OPERATIONS.
2. PHYSICAL SITE FEATURES OUTSIDE THE AREA OF WORK OR THOSE FEATURES
NOT RELEVANT TO THE WORK BEING PERFORMED ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE VEGETATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
VEGETATION PLAN. SEE DETAIL B, SHEET CG501.
SPECIFIC WORK ITEMS -THIS SHEET:
n RIP -RAP SILL - SEE DETAILS, SHEET CS501.
n TURBIDITY CURTAIN - SEE DETAIL A, SHEET CG501.
x -2.66
©-2.95
SILL ALIGNMENT POINT 'B'
SEE SHEET CS119 FOR SILL ALIGNMENT
TABLE OF BEARINGS AND DISTANCES
\ \\ x -2.23
x -1.35
x -2.80
\ x -2.26
O\ x -1.62
�00000, \ \\\
\ �O�EX CONCRETE RUBBLE
v 7.85 ��TO REMAIN IQ
%oOoGoOlo cp
moo_ /Mkt- .AIL /Li' AIL
0
20' 40'
.........I
.••••••...
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
x -2.84
x -2.35
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C70706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digit:::"
. ly signed by Joh Avolis
,1►t'� 11 �i
to
fazi
4Tt•41%.0.14!418:32-15
ALtir
38
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/E
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
z
J
0
0
z
0
0
w
w
z
z
w
u)
w
J
0
w
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. -
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766756
SHEET 27 OF
29
CS124
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1
2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
g
D
C
B
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
MEAN WATER LINE
TAPER FILL TO NATURAL GRADE
+ + +
SMOOTH CORDGRASS (SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA), SPRIGGED
AS PER SILL PLANTING TYPE — SEE SILL TYPES (BELOW)
+ + +
NO DISTURBANCE
THIS AREA
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
EXISTING TOE
OF BANK
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
CL RIP RAP SILL —SEE LAYOUT BASELINE
SHEETS CS101 & CS119 FOR LAYOUT
••••
, 0 tabs I pa •
••• ss .0
tibittudvia
i•-•••••••••••••••••
I •••• 1104 ss
S •••• %.*_._._
%ISM% %We
8 •••• •4.
•••• *Ow,.
• •••• *
tt10.4.
41110164
••s. ..4.4 )4 000
• 0 • • 0 . . '
1 . 00 • 00 •
••••••••••••••••.'
poo.0000.•
poo.0000%
poo.00••••••a
%%8000"
0 . 0 • • •••
Os% 44••••••
0. 00 • 0 '
••••••••••••••
.•••••-•* r
RIP —RAP SILL —SEE SITE PLAN FOR LAYOUT
PLAN VIEW
O o
r- PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA
.71
TYP.
TYPE 'A' TYPE 'B'
STANDARD PLANTING CLUSTERED PLANTING
SILL TYPES (PLANTING)
TYP.
TYPE 'C'
NO PANTING
PLANTING VARIES BY SILL TYPE — SEE PLAN
WIDTH VARIES — 30' MAXIMUM — SEE PLAN
SMOOTH CORDGRASS (SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA), SPACED
AS PER SILL TYPE — SEE SILL TYPES (ABOVE)
0% GRADE FLAT
SELECT BACKFILL
SEE SPECIFICATIONS
RIP -RAP SILL
NOT TO SCALE
2'
TYP.
5'
3'
RIP RAP
SEE SPECIFICATIONS
STRUCTURAL GEOGRID
ON EXISTING GRADE
(2) LAYERS FILTER FABRIC
SECTION
0' MAX
REFLECTIVE MARKER POST
SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
SILL SECTION LENGTH -SEE SITE PLAN
REFLECTIVE MARKER POST
SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET
TURBIDITY CURTAIN
SEE DETAIL, SHEET CG501
/— EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
EXISTING TOE
OF BANK
SMOOTH CORDGRASS (SPARTINA
ALTERNIFLORA), SPACING AS PER SILL
TYPE — SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
REFLECTIVE MARKER POST
SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET
TOP OF SILL = +0.76'
/MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION = +0.26'
TOP OF FILL ELEVATION = +0.26'
NOTCH ELEVATION = 0.00'
MEAN LOW WATER ELEVATION = —0.11'
BOTTOM ELEVATION = VARIES (SEE PLAN)
TURBIDITY CURTAIN
SEE DETAIL, SHEET CG501
RIP RAP SILL
A
0000000�
�0000000
B
SMOOTH CORDGRASS (SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA), SPRIGGED
AS PER SILL PLANTING TYPE — SEE DETAIL A, THIS SHEET
+
00000000000000000000000p0000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000L
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°'L'L'L°°°'L°°°'L°°°'L°'L° OYSTER SHELLS — TOP
000000000000000000000000000000000000�
00000000000000000000000a0000000000000000
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAA AA AA AA AA AA ALL
0000000000000000000000000000000000000002
A A A AA A A AA A A AA A A AA A A AA AAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AZ
WAWA Q 0 0 ALLL ALLL 0 0 L 0.L0 L 0 L 0 L 0 Q LLLLLLLL
NL000000000000000000LLLALL0 000
SILL SECTION
NOTCH SECTION] 10'
OF NOTCH TO TOP OF
FILL ELEVATION
— A
- B
PLAN VIEW
2 2
OYSTER SHELLS TOP OF NOTCH
TO TOP OF FILL ELEVATION
VARIES —SEE PLAN
SECTION A -A
10'
CL RIP RAP SILL
0% GRADE (FLAT)
v y v y v y
SELECT BACKFILL
SEE SPECIFICATIONS
SLOPE TO NOTCH ELEVATION
p ♦ . .
° ° 0 ° ° 0 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °
VVVVVV°°OYSTER SHELLS7°°
°°°°°°°° V v v v v v v v°
777777777777777777
2
SECTION B-B
RIP -RAP SILL OPENING
SILL SECTION
TOP OF SILL = +0.76'
/MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION = +0.26'
/TOP OF FILL ELEVATION = +0.26'
NOTCH ELEVATION = 0.00'
MEAN LOW WATER ELEVATION = —0.11'
BOTTOM ELEVATION = VARIES (SEE PLAN)
RIP RAP EXTENDS THROUGH SILL OPENING
AT NOTCH ELEVATION
2
RIP RAP EXTENDS THROUGH SILL OPENING
AT NOTCH ELEVATION
REFLECTOR MOUNTED ON 4 SIDES
3" o (MIN.) REFLECTIVE SURFACE
6X6 PRESSURE TREATED POST
2.5 LB/CFT MIN. RETENTION
NOTE: REFLECTIVE MARKER POSTS
SHALL BE SET AT 50' 0.C. ALONG
LENGTH OF RIP —RAP SILL. SEE
PLAN FOR LOCATION.
v MEAN WATER LEVEL
REFLECTIVE MARKER POST
BOTTOM ELEVATION
TOP OF SILL = +0.76'
/MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION = +0.26'
/TOP OF FILL ELEVATION = +0.26'
NOTCH ELEVATION = 0.00'
MEAN LOW WATER ELEVATION = —0.11'
BOTTOM ELEVATION = VARIES (SEE PLAN)
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C70706
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
Digitly signed by Joh Avolis
.s` ■8
sS1p ". y
411
SEAL
tItE111:47
SEAL
NRW
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
A/E
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO DATE
DES JKA I DRW MSP
CHK JCA
PM/DM
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0
H
z
Q
0
0
z
0
0
0
w
w
z
0
z
w
w
J
0
u_
NAVAL STATION - NORFOLK, VA
IPT MARINE CORPS
CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO.. —
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766757
29
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SHEET 28 OF
CS501
1
2
3
4
5
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

2
3
4
5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
FABRIC
QL_LJ
W uJ
�.
llllllllllllilillllllllllT E
•
WATER SURFACE
Inl
CONNECTOR CABLE
BUOY
MINI 2'
Inn
n
ELEVATION
5'
—CURTAIN BOTTOM
FLOAT
CONNECTOR
n
IIIII III J II IIIII II
SECTION-PARALLEL TO SHORELINE
1
AUTOMATIC FLASHING LIGHT
(ON AT DUSK —OFF AT
DAWN) 100' ON CENTER
STANDARD CONTAINMENT
SYSTEMS LIGHT BUOY
ANCHOR
IIIIII-III=
IIII11-
NOTES:
1. CURTAIN SHALL BE HEAVY DUTY, TYPE III BARRIER - SUITABLE
FOR EXPOSURE TO MODERATE WIND, WAVES, AND MOVING
WATER.
2. THE FULL EXTENT OF THE TURBIDITY CURTAIN IS NOT SHOWN
ON THE PROJECT PLANS FOR CLARITY. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL PROVIDE TURBIDITY CURTAINS OF APPROPRIATE LENGTH
AND HEIGHT TO COMPLETELY ENCLOSE THE PROJECT WORK
AREA UNTIL A STABILE ENVIRONMENT IS REESTABLISHED. THE
TURBIDITY CURTAIN SHALL EXTEND TO AND BE ANCHORED TO
UPLAND SHORELINE LIMITS.
TURBIDITY CURTAIN
NOT TO SCALE
TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE SEEDING
(PRIOR TO ESTABLISHING PERMANENT VEGETATION)
AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES AND THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SWALES, ALL EXPOSED AREAS MUST
BE SEEDED TO THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS:
SEED BED
LIME 1-1/2 TON PER ACRE
FERTILIZER 1/2-TON PER ACRE
SEED
RYE GRAIN 50 LBS PER ACRE
TALL FESCUE 100 LBS PER ACRE
SUPPLEMENTAL SEED
MAY THROUGH AUGUST:
CENTIPEDE 5 LBS PER ACRE
PROCEDURE
STRAW MULCH MUST BE APPLIED AT A RATE WHICH WILL INSURE APPROXIMATELY 75%
COVERAGE OF THE SEEDED AREA. THE STRAW AND SOWN SEED WILL BE LIGHTLY DISCED
INTO THE BED TO GIVE IT FURTHER RESISTANCE TO BLOWING AND WASHING. THE
CONTRACTOR MUST GUARANTEE A FULL STAND OF GRASS OVER THE ENTIRE
DISTURBED AREA. IF NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR WILL WET DOWN THE AREAS TO
ASSIST IN SEED GERMINATION OR AID IN GROWTH IN TIMES OF EXCESSIVELY DRY
WEATHER. A STAND OF GRASS WILL BE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE WHEN THE ENTIRE
STAND OF GRASS IS AT LEAST FOUR INCHES HIGH AND HAS ACHIEVED AT LEAST 95%
COVERAGE OF DISTURBED AREAS. RESEEDING WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY BY THE
CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE SPECIFIED STAND OF GRASS.
PERMANENT VEGETATION
ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT COVERED WITH BUILDINGS, PAVEMENTS, OR OTHER
IMPERMEABLE SURFACES MUST BE SODDED WITH CENTIPEDE SOLID SOD AS THE
FINAL/PERMANENT VEGETATION.
SPECIAL SEEDING NOTE:
ALL DENUDED AREAS WILL, WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF COMPLETION OF
ANY PHASE OF GRADING OR CEASING OF GRADING ACTIVITIES, BE PLANTED
AND PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT GROUND COVER, DEVICES,
OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION.
ALL DENUDED AREAS WILL, WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION, BE PROVIDED PERMANENT GROUND COVER.
VEGETATION PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
APPLICATION NOTE:
THIS VEGETATION PLAN APPLIES ONLY TO UPLAND AREAS DISTURBED AS A
RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
THIS VEGETATION PLAN IS NOT APPLICABLE TO WETLANDS, COASTAL MARSH,
OR OPEN WATER AREAS.
THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT INSTALL SEED, MULCH OR SOD IN ANY
WETLAND, COASTAL VARSH, OR OPEN WATER AREAS.
REVISED SILL LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
cn
LICENSE NO. C-0706 Nor
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28561
PH.[phone]
PROJECT: 19028-P2
uigit
ZOVVMAIP
HVOI I
SEAL
15738
: . ..z;.
17.
Sri•.
rrrr�ptN ' }A' °
SEAL
ENGINEERING
Structural Consultants
748 Lord Dunmore Drive, Suite 101
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
APPROVED
FOR COMMANDER NAVFAC
ACTIVITY
SATISFACTORY TO
DES JKA
PM/DM
DATE
DRW MSP
CHK JCA
BRANCH MANAGER
CHIEF ENG/ARCH
FIRE PROTECTION
0_
H
Z
J
0_
0
Z
0
0
0
Z
w
w
z
z
w
w
J_
0
w
U.S. MARINE CORPS AIR STATION
INSTALL LIVING SHORELINE
cn
J
a
1-
w
0
SCALE: AS NOTED
EPROJECT NO..
MAXIMO WORK ORDER NO.
6973177
NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
12766758
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1
2
3
4
5
SHEET
29 GF 29
CG501
DRAWFORM REVISION: 10 MARCH 2009
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY