20130471 Ver 1_Application_20130503

PAT MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
April 24, 2013
Ms. Lori Beckwith, NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -2714
20 1 3 0 4 7 1
ANTHONY J.TATA
SECRETARY
Subject: Nationwide 14 Permit Application
SR 1307 Shelton Road
Transylvania County
State Project-No. 14C.088075 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $240.00)
Dear Ms. Beckwith:
MAY n 2013
The North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) is proposing to widen, grade, drain
and pave SR 1307, Shelton Road, in Transylvania County for a distance of approximately 0.8 of
a mile from NC 281 to the end of maintenance. SR 1307 is a secondary gravel road, which
conveys local traffic.
I am enclosing a PCN application, Rapanos Jurisdictional form, plan sheets showing the
proposed work, a marked county map, a USGS quad map and photographs.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Database was checked for records of threatened and
endangered species. The database lists 49 species for Transylvania County that have federal
status. The bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) is listed as threatened due to similarity of
appearance to the listed northern bog turtle. Eight species, Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel
(Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus), Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana), mountain sweet
pitcher plant (Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii), small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides),
spreading avens (Geum radiatum), swamp pink (Helonias bullata), Virginia spiraea ( Spiraea
virginiana) and rock gnome lichen (Gymnoderma lineare), are listed as either threatened or
endangered.
The rock gnome lichen, small whorled pogonia and bog turtle occur within a five mile radius of
the project. The small whorled pogonia occurs within the Indian Creek watershed approximately
3.3 miles from the project.
Part of the project is within U.S. Forest Service property; therefore, the project was surveyed for
protecte&species. Special emphasis was placed on the small whorled pogonia because the
Division 14, District 1 ,
Telephone: [phone] Havwood'Road, Mills River, NC 28759 Fax: [phone]

SR 1307 Page 2 April 24, 2013
habitat appeared to have some potential for small whorled pogonia and the species occurs within
the watershed. Biologists from NCDOT's Natural Environment Unit and Division 14
Environmental Office performed protected species surveys along the entire project corridor.
The project is limited in scope to a relatively short secondary road widening and paving. Best
management practices will minimize adverse effects on aquatic habitat. No threatened or
endangered species were identified during the surveys. For these reasons, we recommend a "no
effect" determination for threatened and endangered species.
The project was reviewed for the potential to affect archaeological and historic architectural
resources by NCDOT's Human Environment Unit. The reviews determined that no surveys were
required for this project.
NCDOT best management practices will be used to minimize and control erosion and
sedimentation on this project. The construction foreman will review all erosion control measures
daily to ensure erosion and sedimentation is being controlled effectively. If the devices are not
functioning as intended, they will be replaced immediately with better devices. Water will be
pumped around the culvert work areas to minimize erosion and sedimentation from the pipe
trench.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The unnamed tributaries to Indian Creek (DWQ Class C Tr) at Sites 1 -2 are small and not shown
on the topographic map. The unnamed tributary to Blue Ridge Lake (DWQ Class B Tr) is also
small and is not shown on the USGS map. However, the streams have good flow and well -
defined channels (1 -3 feet wide) that lack vegetation and have substrates of sand and gravel. The
streams appear to be perennial. The streams at site one flows approximately 0.7 miles to Indian
Creek. The stream at site two flows approximately 435 feet to the unnamed tributary at site one
just downstream of the road. Indian Creek flows approximately 5.3 miles to Toxaway River.
Toxaway River flows approximately 4.8 miles to Lake Jocassee. The unnamed tributary at site
three flows approximately 750 feet to Blue Ridge Lake. Blue Ridge Lake flows approximately
0.5 miles to Indian Creek. Indian Creek then flows approximately 5.8 miles to Toxaway River.
Toxaway River flows approximately 4.8 miles to Lake Jocassee. Lake Jocassee meets the
definition of a Traditional Navigable Water. For these reasons, we, believe that the streams are
Relatively Permanent Water and are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
In order to replace these culverts, it will be necessary to impact waters of the United States in the
Savannah River Basin. Specifically, NCDOT is requesting to replace and/or extend two metal
culverts in unnamed tributaries to Indian Creek and one metal culvert in an unnamed tributary to
Blue Ridge Lake. Listed below is a summary of the proposed impacts.
Site
Existing Condition
Proposed Condition
Net Impacts
Station on
Site 1
50'x 36" CMP
50'x 36" CMP
0
Site IA
Free Flowing Stream .
Flow Diversion
75'

SR 1307 Page 3 April 24, 2013
Site 2
30' x 24" CMP
40'x 24" CMP
10'
Site 2A
Free Flowing Stream
Flow Diversion
65'
Site 3
30' x 24" CMP
50'x 24" CMP
20'
Site 3A
Free Flowing Stream
Flow Diversion
75'
Total Permanent Impacts 30'
Total Temporary Impacts for Impervious Dikes and Flow Diversion 215'
Permits Requested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the
construction project outlined above. By copy of this letter, I am asking Ms. Marla Chambers,
Western Region DOT Review Coordinator, of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit
request.
I am also requesting authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act from the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). In addition, I am asking Ms. Chambers and Mr. Ben DeWit, Roadside Environmental
Field Operations Engineer ( NCDOT), to comment directly to me concerning this permit request.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (828) 891 -7911 or
Mr. Ben Williams at (828) 891 -7911.
Sincerely,
Steve L. Cannon, P.E.
District Engineer
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Amy Chapman, DWQ -DENR, Raleigh
Mr. Mike Parker, DWQ, Asheville
Ms. Marla Chambers, Western Region DOT Review Coordinator, NCWRC
Mr. Jason Mays, Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville
Mr. Mark Davis, Division Environmental Officer
Mr. Ben DeWit, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Mr. Ben Williams, P.E., Transylvania County Maintenance Engineer, NCDOT
File

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name SR 1307 Shelton Road
2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant; NCDOT
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: N/A
*Agent authorization needs to be attached. `
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
5. Site Address
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City: Lake Toxaway
8. County: _Transylvania
9. Lat: 35.16934°N Long: 82.93616 °W (Approximate Project Center)
10. Quadrangle Name: Lake Toxaway (35082 -B8 -TF -024)
11. Waterway: UTs to Indian Creek to Toxaway River (Class C Tr and Class B TO
12. Watershed: Savannah
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 14
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre - Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
aI
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site /Waters Name:
Keywords:
Begin Date

a
it rl '`a.�ti4 3�
Pre- Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and /or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
SR 1307 Shelton Road
Transylvania County
h ~PROF NORTH C4�
Y
.F
0 2
O
C
P
99j�FHT Of TR ANSQO <P
NCDOT Division 14

� W AT
O`,o FgQG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ®No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
El Yes
®No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. .
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2.
Project.lnformation
2a.
Name of project:
SR 1307 Shelton Road
2b.
County:
Transylvania
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Lake Toxaway
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
14C.088075
3.
Owner Information
3a_
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
N/A
3e.
City, state, zip:
N/A
3f.
Telephone no.:
N/A
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant'Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: District Engineer
4b. Name:
Steve L Cannon
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d. Street address:
4142 Haywood Road
4e. City, state, zip:
Mills River, NC 28759
4f. Telephone no.:
828 - 891 -7911
4g. Fax no.:
828 - 891 -5026
4h. Email address:
slcannon @ncdot.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
N/A
5c. Street address:
N/A
5d. City, state, zip:
N/A
5e. Telephone no.:
N/A
5f. Fax no.:
N/A
5g. Email address:
N/A
Page 2 of 11
PC Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
N/A
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.16934 Longitude: - 82.93616
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Unnamed Tributaries to Indian Creek and Blue Ridge
proposed project:
Lake
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Sites 1 & 2 (C Tr); Site 3 (B Tr)
2c. River basin:
Savannah
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Landscape is primarily deciduous forest with some openings for homesites. A portion of the project is within the National
Forest. Area is rural with limited single family residences.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
N/A
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To upgrade the existing gravel road to current NCDOT secondary road standards
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Erosion and Sedimentation control measures will be installed. Corridor will be cleared, grubbed and excavated to
increase road width. Water will be diverted and culverts will be replaced and /or extended. Road bed will be prepared,
base installed and the road paved. Track hoes, dump trucks, bulldozers, paving equipment, water pumps, diversion pipe,
various hand tools will be used to accomplish the work.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: N/A
Name (if known): N/A
Other: N/A
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
N/A
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
N/A
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No'
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
N/A
2h. Comments: N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
UT to Indian
® PER
® Corps
3
0
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S1A ❑ P ® T
Flow Diversion
UT to Indian
Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
3
75
S2 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
UT to Indian
Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
2
10
S2A ❑ P ®T
Flow Diversion
UT to Indian.
Creek
® PER
E] INT
® Corps
® DWQ
2
75
S3 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
UT to Indian
® PER
® Corps
1
20
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
SM ❑ P ® T
Flow Diversion
UT to Indian
Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
1
75
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
30
3i. Comments: Total Temporary Impact for Impervious Dikes and Flow Diversion 225
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
N/A
4g. Comments: N/A
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.,
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
P2
5f. Total
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: N/A
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
N/A
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
Yes
B1 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
� s
N/A
N/A
El Yes
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
❑ Yes
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
N/A
N/A
6i. Comments: N/A ,
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The culverts
are being extended only to the length necessary to provide the minimum width needed to bring this road up to current
secondary road standards Headwalls will be installed to limit culvert length.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
An impervious dike will be installed in the channel to minimize the water flowing into the work area. Then water will be
diverted around the site during pipe installation to limit downstream habitat and water quality degradation. Appropriate BMPs
according to the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be installed on the project prior to culvert installation.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
F1 Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type N/A
Quantity N/A
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ®cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
N/A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)'— required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ®No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
N/A
N/A
3 (2 for Catawba)
N/A
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
N/A
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes El No
Comments: N/A
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: N/A
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The plan is covered under the NCDOT General Stormwater Permit NCS000250
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ® No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project involves the widening and paving of a secondary gravel road to minimum secondary road standards. The
road is a dead end that conveys only local traffic. Secondary and cumulative impacts would not be expected from this
secondary road project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Database. Suvey of Road Project by NCDOT Biologists with Natural Environment Unit.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
N /A- -There are no marine or esturaine habitat within the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The project was reviewed by the NCDOT Human Enironment Unit for potential impacts to archaeological and
architectural resources. No surveys were required for the respective resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Maping Program
Steve L. Cannon
4/24/2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
�_ PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section,IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: SR 1307 Shelton Road
State:NC County/parish/borough: Transylvania City: Lake Toxaway
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.16934° N, Long. 82.93616° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed Tributary to Indian Creek {DWQ Class C Tr (Sits I & 2) & B Tr (Site 3 )
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Lake Jocassee
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03060 1010100 10
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc... ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: April 23, 2013
® Field Determination. Date(s): May 2, 2011
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S. r
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 450 linear feet: 1 -2 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres. r
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM-
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e 2 tvpically 3 monthtl.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section HI.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections 1II.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section 1H.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent ":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapauos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non- navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section HI.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HI.B.1 for
the tributary, Section IH.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section IH.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section HI.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man- altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: PickList. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
F1 Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by deNelopment or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies wil l look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick'Lisi aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/1) Size in acres) Directly abuts? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non- RPW,and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (8), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: The streams have had flow over several years of planning of this project; the streams have well defined
channels..
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 450 linear feet 1 -2 width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has asignificant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USG 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: , .
❑ 100 -_year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date):Culvert Sites, February 2010.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

Permit Sites
SR 1307 — Shelton Road, Transylvania County
Site 1 Outlet End
�- P < »� •� � ;- 'gas,. r �
- Ang •` -y _ • aka' Y
iig V�;�`s�+T��.r�� "mad "r' �,?`p:, - '• ,�,-� � �,,� ; � �.

Site 2 Outlet End
f,}x �St 4 "* �'' �, d• +�{" ' ,"jry t' i -; �&�• fr `as -z%p
�� yt1 LET `'° -^.- ;.\A.�,•. _ _ N�� -, j� �y ��E� ._ _` f � �: -.+ .
VO). , <� t • 7
IR
Nv
B .,''s:<��-' &a'. , �` "may, .. � fii�s�?�` �, *.r'� 7 ■ rte;'`,
�•v" >�"s4'�'i�x - 3 �°f+���' �, ... ��t,,,'��`�3,r�, "'f "r"''xs,.� ��
.`��+�,��,�. 3,.: � 6 °: = i+,i �.. ..' a UvF`�^ °',L"�ll(.'y i'f'��;h�''• °i`-�' %
,µs. Y �F ' "�'u.�. r^F� `,.3i`rLi�',.n'e v:^"✓' i ,% ki"� �'M.` ✓„ _ _
�- �"`�'`� i'�� '4.. � ,.�'�• , -�,;,• vo�; =.* 2�`., �,�, �. �;�`,_.{ i�'�1 °i+�#,�,:i °--, fie'. - -�� '�,��
.}`,"+�:.t.
atu`'
i., _'"�`.���) � �' .'�w.:.' ",'I`� ^�•t�.'s"�" . *°,ate ";` �w@�.:a�'`�;,' w,�[A�-,� �s

Site 3 Outlet End

!#1 Sta. 0 +60
1307
!Iton Road
nsylvania County
2
Coordinates 35.170780 N / 82.931400 W
Existing & Prop. Center Line
--------------------- I- ----------------- - - - Ih-
Oulet Invert Elev. Replace Existing
988.9 50', 36" CMP
with 50', 36" CMP and headwalls
cgs Approximately 20' from shoulder of existing road
1 989.4
2 988.4
plans for erosion control
42 Sta. 4 +95
1307
dton Road
nsylvania County
1
Inlet Invert Elev.
989.3
* Drawing not to scale
Coordinates 35.170190 N 182
Existing & Prop. Center Line
Oulet Invert Elev. Replace Existing
996.4 30', 24" CMP
with 40', 24" CMP and headwalls
cgs Approximately 20' from shoulder of existing road
1 997.2
2 996.0
plans for erosion control
1
Inlet Invert Elev.
997.0
W
" Drawing not to scale

# 3 Sta. 38 +95 Coordinates 35.168810 N 1 82.93804° W
1307
Mon Road
nsylvania County
Existing & Prop. Center Line
2 1 1
- - - -- ------------- - - - - -- - F
Oulet Invert Elev. Replace Existing Perched Inlet Invert Elev.
989.4 30', 24" CMP 990.3
with 50', 24" CMP and headwalls
Iwegs Approximately 20' from shoulder of existing road
1 996.3
2 989.3
plans for erosion control " Drawing not to scale I

h . .:fit✓ "`a s J .`..z rs • ,u 7. ��. h :;y,� " 11
y
F en + t ";;
• i . 7 A , r . t
' . t , . , .Vi .x • � . ! 11 I f
; , - 1 i y� 5 ,C
, - . ce
� :
� � ah 0; Nt ft3 M
.
} -_ t `i;
4 Q ry
- l h( *y 1�+5,5yTZ�� 4r .ohs ., , �` "� .; i i ' , ' e -° '' -< 1\ 11 s ,�� x, v
'.
. *tai ' '_ s fib" .. s7 # ;` fr '- Yt i E t `�'y.:
tt��..
r c. s a „y t 1'
x : ,, �`�a s , 5 I, A .� kl !
M
a: 1 .
y
"e'er. s h t- t -,j',--.`, :.: & r '�
�.
�. 7�� phi �,y, t O r ..+" .,t < R. M 5 - y s �C k1�k
d i ' ,y Yy , - S h
zr a `R
t h 1 3 11 . t` +.
Fr- �i 4 ' 4
t n 3
" q'� `�' ii v'' .r a 5
' 9 5- � d -_ . C, .- ^ �' y r i s .`.?, z lt..' S�;�V'
r ) t � -. r t s dX'^y3� zti .c3,n i ~, {' ll5, s,. ,
Y SRb w , 'ii L .11 �� _ .,, ,'
r <?f�'Sy? 3 �t5�.. J s y 4 �, _ 1 }y ( } _Z s`� - u ! 1
yu "iF"i r 4 ../ s}:. Ss t,; b.. yrY - tom.- , `#
ny
,r4i ar' y� �, e ��(. kt , "• Y'll �*� , . K ' °'.e. ' }`�. }: o- �yi . y '`+ 'as} y� r '�i�,� 1 ,�, 11
y"- NV,R Si.. F TMiw. �'G ♦ �.c yti tti ` \i y `t ..u, E 4f
yz y' jq L .� y. ti tK �, }.c � t s.. t iC y� y "� t �r. ;'J '` '4,,, i � '
s .'y "Y i.' t 0" ;N-, 't °��'� � 4 is { d `" �+r } $ -M1 ,rte ",..�,,, �
y L �1� + t 3 ii! { �s +i ws4 fs
t
4, y nett , a ,h `t r ;,. ,� ya. N "z„ ? `� r b •ms's
S� 1-, ! t�s' it e; ;e y . r� Vey a M
a _ w .. :il
i
c
> �`4 a � 'Jf ��' t .y s� r. r 1 2 , � .'.. ;
i i 1
t.
fi i I ? } F r�`,K , x 8 ` - I , of .w. 1.
-;; c Ir y l; r , IJ r L ,. Y �— -a� . - r
�yy _ ; . �. x fir- -�. .; 1 a,to ',4 s ' :.-s
r �'.1 3 .
r
y:r'i•M -wF y -liv /" -• j .jam 1 J i
3 \� r_ t IN -t 4 t > t • i ,.
Lit} a3 # i " -14 � " -F} a 1r + .!,
. , .} 3 --err . Y "'+ ", 4 i r i� �� 7 f "'+ ` !'. Y -. It- t ( `W '� 5 '`rw y,irT F
ff-. I ` L� ,., ... 11 * i. -, � -* 14 - 7-;'-'f;-

♦J
U
^^0
I.J.. cu
c
0
n/ L
I1..iL cu
�U
C
L
�p
O Z
4-r
o
0
oU
0� cu
C 'C
o cu
>
U) c
�cu
L
m
r
LL
U)
Fn
m
N
N
U)
•
_0 o w
c L- N
-0 E L
W
cu c ca O >
O Z `p a�i M :3
C a cn cn z v
Me
N
N
. e
Iu
r
c
lu
u
c
�u
c
I

N -a^'
O W
M L
r U
L
UCo
o W Cc
c
o U
0 � LLN CU L
r
U) C
Cn
Ll
rn M Co
rn
m c -0
o
0
W L- Cu
m m
Co a E tn
Cu
Co c to
E p o mo o
78
C a i
Li
IO
rn
N
d'
M
N
U)
O
,• -,
' ...J
m ,j 4jUeieluno
e,
9f . ,. ^
3 a <• r :x.li�,' {,. ,: _il "i" c ii " ; ^s,!
G ✓8 Wo a/l
1000
VO
Co
r.;.�,;.my- .���•"
�,
, m
...`k,U
as
�`* ��.,`F'; - � '; �,fA 4. � � �' §';SiVversleen d . -t :.:a . _• �'; u-
v
✓
_ �:; � vtai ° =" v. ♦
� app oN
mr
to ap, wi " +'';,,,,f nAzf., >faa
. A
aG Z/ aMe
.•;,P' ,6:' , ;, a - ',a „a;• a
f';;,r',eg ; s„ K;.ts a .' tiv .;s Ke
kol
e P. iti{�.yni
ties
it Ar
',I.FT
”
- ,3°'4;,S1f'1` n,� 5�
QUO
Oi
U)
•^�� illp>'
4;,;,st i'
:�o]�ly;s /;.se''' =:a; «r; ♦a V
(D
�aai saw
t
G<e
-ye 'q a JJ'/O
p
Creek
lic'ens
-'YaJ Quo n
a�
D Branch
960
Cn
Ll
rn M Co
rn
m c -0
o
0
W L- Cu
m m
Co a E tn
Cu
Co c to
E p o mo o
78
C a i
Li
IO
rn
N
d'
M
N
U)
O
,• -,

N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SECONDARY ROAD SURVEY
SUBJECT: Shelton Rd. SR 1307
LOCATION: Begin at the intersection of NC 281 and SR 1307 and continue in a
Westerly direction for a total distance of 4260 feet to the end of the project at the dead
end.
WORK TYPE: Grade, Drain, Base, Pave & Erosion Control
WORK ORDER: 14.088075 PRIORITY:
COUNTY: Transylvania TOWNSHIP: Lake Toxaway
DATE: 7/7/2010 - (4/13/12 Revised)(Revised 810312012) SCALE: I"=50'
Current ADT Bracket 0 -360 Design ADT Bracket 0 -600
Water: UT to Indian Creek, Class C; Tr, .HQW;
NOTES: 50' R/W EC PREPARED BY: BA
509 0`9
RIGHT OF WAY
CENTERLINE
n� i n7 I A I 77
I ASPHALT PAVEMENT I I
SHOULDER ' SHOULDER
DITCH
MAX SLOPE
FILL 1 w: l
CUT 1:1
a��

SAG
2%
2%
I%
I%
Z
O
US FOREST SERVICE
9999 -99 -0881 -000
S +UU
Replace 30' x 24' CM I
With 40' x 24' CAP
with Headwalls
100' ESA F 1
/// 490, Silt Check Type A
I` Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x8' w /baffle
0 4 1 Silt Basin Type B
12 81 2'x3'x8' w /baffle
1 03
11091
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I 1
I
I I
'A CREST I 12 81 T
� I i
Low and end point measures must 1 ( 12' Wattle
be installed in all silt fences
SR1307 Page I
Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
12' Wattle
1 Silt Basin Ty e B
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
1 I Silt Check Type A
(Turnout)
3' Stream
= =a Er
_t� o
I Q I 100' ESA
Replace 50'x 36
With 50' x 36' CN
with Headwalls
M
IPA YM.
Begin Project // 4 514 5
n nn
O
US FOREST SERVICE
9999 -99- 0881 -000
Lment Ends +20
Beain Pro iect

Z
9%
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x2'x6' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
Silt Check Type A
Propose 50' x 18° HDPE
Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
4%
I
0
�I
C
C
I
I
12' Wattle I I
12' Wattle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /baffle
Silt Check Type A;
100' ESA
I
II 0
IUD
101
I , ran
3
O
Ln
Silt Basin Type B
?'x3'x6' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
?'x3'x6' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
?'x3'x9' w /baffle
Silt Check Type A
W Turnout
12' Wattle
12° Wattle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type �
2'x3�,w /boAW,-
.�itf Check Wbe A
SR1307 Page 2
O
US FOREST SERVICE
9999 -9970881 -000
O
US FOREST SERVICE
9%
9999 -99- 0881 -000
4%
4%
I
0
�I
C
C
I
I
12' Wattle I I
12' Wattle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /baffle
Silt Check Type A;
100' ESA
I
II 0
IUD
101
I , ran
3
O
Ln
Silt Basin Type B
?'x3'x6' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
?'x3'x6' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
?'x3'x9' w /baffle
Silt Check Type A
W Turnout
12' Wattle
12° Wattle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type �
2'x3�,w /boAW,-
.�itf Check Wbe A
SR1307 Page 2
O
US FOREST SERVICE
9999 -9970881 -000

4%
4%
9%
15 +00
11081
Dirt
Drive
Propose 50' x 18' HDPE 1
119
128
Low and end point measures must
be installed in all silt fences
I
114
o12° Wattle
US FOREST SERVICE
9999 -99- 0881 -000 4
II2
�12
6i
►I
I
I
I�
81,
'T❑
12' Wattle SR1307 Page 3
3
0
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3 x6' w /baffle
Silt Check Type A
Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
O
US FOREST SERVICE
9999 -99- 0881 -000
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
Install silt fence 2' -4' beyond
top of cut as temp diversion
from sta.10 +50 to sto.12 +25

Z
3%
V)
(D
US FOREST SERVICE
9999 -99- 0881 -000
Low and end point measures must
be installed in all silt fences
Replace 30' x 18' CMP
With 50' x 18' HDPE
3%
U-
Ln
4%
3
O
I
20 +00 SR1307 Page 4
11271 (
3 OWENS ROBERT B & SUSAN K
911 SOUTHERN PINE LN
b SARASOTA, FL 34243 -1733
8523 -49- 3805 -000
12' Wattle 321- 143
�128�
I I 12' Wattle
I I
�I 0
14 12' Wattle US FOREST SERVICE
9999 -99- 0881 -000
I I Silt Basin Type B
I I 2'x3'x7' w /baffle
I
17 Silt Basin Type B
13 7 2'x3'x7' w /baffle
Silt Check Type A
i
Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
I L6
1381p
110181
iF, -L nn
12' Wattle
12' Wattle

Gravel Drive,
16
JONES KAREN DALE
3% PO BOX 167 V)
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0167
8523 -39- 7589 -000
250 - 899
Replace 30' x 18° CMP
SAG With 50' x 18° HDPE
1%
CREST A
17 Y,
5� GIBSON VELDA S
32 WOLF RIDGE RD
LAKE TOXAWAY,NC 28747 -9763
8523 -39- 8798 -000
395 - 53
Wolf Rid�c e
SR1376 M,
2
it 2
Low and end point must
measures m u 1
be installed in all silt fences
18
KROPELNICKI JAMES & TOMOKO 1 E
415 SHELTON RD
LAKE TOXAWAY,NC 28747 1
8523-49- 0786 -000
193 - 179 1
I
Gravel Drive 1
i
5,
O Ln Ln
US FOREST SERVICE '—
3
3% 9999 -99- 0881 -000
0
Propose 50'x 18' HDPE
I
I I 11�j
01
1
I
1 ►161
T 1
I I
I�
'I I
11271
?n +nn
SR1307 Page 5
Silt Basin
Type B
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
Silt Check
Type A
Silt Check
Type A
Silt Basin
Type B
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
12° Wattle
Oq
FOSTER RICHARD L & LOUISE
4219 SWIFT ROAD
SARASOTA, FL 34231
8524 -30- 9015 -000
301 - 457
12° Wattle
Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
12° Wattle
12° Wattle
12° Wattle FOSTER RICHARD .L & LOUISE
4219 SWIFT ROAD
SARASOTA, FL 34231
8524 -40- 0029 -000
284 13/32 709
12° Wattle
Replace 30' x 15° RCP
With 30' x 15' HDPE
Gravel Drive
12° Wattle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x8' w /baffle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x8' w /baffle
Silt Check Type A
O
OWENS ROBERT B & SUSAN K
911 SOUTHERN PINE LN
SARASOTA, FL 34243 -1733
8523 -49- 3805 -000
321 - 143

I >
6%
Replace 30' x 24'C
With 50' x 24' HD
Silt Check Type
Silt Basin Type
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
8% Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
16
JONES KAREN DALE
PO BOX 167
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0167
8523 -39- 7589 -000
250 - 899
6%
6%
3%
Low and end point measures must
be installed in oll silt fences
30 +
+00
114
312' Wattle
V
� o
I �
o
I I
I ,
12' Wattle
MT I
i
,
12' Wattle
MP M
I I
I I
� I I
18l 01
I I
CREST
Ln
i
I
3 � I
b
Gravel Drive p, 1 2 9 I
')C:_Lnn
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
SR1307 Page 6
O
LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
PO BOX 131
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0131
8524 -30- 5099 -000
303 - 455
O
FOSTER RICHARD L & LOUISE
12' Wattle 4219 SWIFT ROAD
SARASOTA, FL 34231
8524 -30- 9015 -000
301 - 457

3%
Low and end point measures must
be installed in all silt fences
O
LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
PO BOX 131
3% LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0131
8523 -39- 3359 -000
250 - 968
6%
6%
T
L.
V)
3
0
35 +00
Ilq
3
114
SR1307 Page . 7
O
Silt Basin Type B LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
2'x3'x7' w /ba fle 218 S BROAD ST
BREVARD, NC 28712
Sasin T e B
3
Silt B 343 -29 8624 -000 F
x x w a s
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x7' w /baffle
12' Wattle Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
12' Wattle
8523 -39- 3849 -000
361- 237 -
12" Wattle
O
LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
PO BOX 131
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0131
12° Wattle 8524 -30- 5099 -000
303 - 455
T-
12' Wattle
J
114
12° Wattle
7
O
E B & JANICE
POE BGOEOR3
12' Wattle
LAKE. TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0131
8523 -39- 3359 -000
250 - 968
12' Wattle
3
14
r55,
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
12° Wattle
14
12' Wattle
6
O
WINTON PAMELA D
2815 S ATLANTIC AVE
12' Wattle
COCOA BEACH FL 32931
8523 -39- 3849 -000
361- 237 -
12" Wattle
O
LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
PO BOX 131
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0131
12° Wattle 8524 -30- 5099 -000
303 - 455
T-

Z 40 +00
2 Silt asin T B
I x 'x ' w /ba fIe
3%
14 Silt Basin Type B
\�
2'x3 x8' w /baffle
GOSTIN EVA MARIE I Silt Check Type A
101 N CLEMATIS ST STE 409
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 -5556
8523 -29- 7174 -000
'AV Par P
436 - 315 100' ESA : A 'Apa .. i
SAG
5%
Replace 30' x
With 50' x 2
with Heac
I' Strean
Silt Check Type A
Silt Basin Type B I
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
Gravel Drive
5� Low and end point measures must
be installed in all silt fences
15
3% KLEIN WILLIAM C & FRANCES W
5 LEONE CT
CHARLESTON,SC 29406 -8604
8523 -29- 9258 -000
294 - 621
U-
Ensure pi e outf all is
OUTSIDE of Lee Property Line
/ Propose 50' x 24' HDPE
3% O
LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
PO BOX 131
LAKE TOXAWAY -NC 28747 -0131
3
12
�!4
SR1307 Page 8
Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
Silt Check Type A
I
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /ba -fle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /baffle
0j-
Im
FAR-'
14
Silt Check Type A
Silt Basin Type B I
2'x3'x6' w /baffle
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
Gravel Drive
5� Low and end point measures must
be installed in all silt fences
15
3% KLEIN WILLIAM C & FRANCES W
5 LEONE CT
CHARLESTON,SC 29406 -8604
8523 -29- 9258 -000
294 - 621
U-
Ensure pi e outf all is
OUTSIDE of Lee Property Line
/ Propose 50' x 24' HDPE
3% O
LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
PO BOX 131
LAKE TOXAWAY -NC 28747 -0131
3
12
�!4
SR1307 Page 8
Coir fiber baffles must be
installed in all silt basins
12' Wattle
71 12' Wattle
O
0
O
JONES KAREN DALE
PO BOX 167
LAKE TOXAWAY,NC 28747 -0167
8523 -29- 5734 -000
436 - 312
LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
218 S BROAD ST
BREVARD, NC 28712
' 12' Wattle 35343_21908624 -000
I I �
Silt Check Type A
Silt Basin Type B
1 4 ^^ 2'x3'x7' w /baffle
L
Silt Check Type A
I
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /ba -fle
Silt Basin Type B
2'x3'x9' w /baffle
/
12' Wattle
12' Wattle
71 12' Wattle
O
0
O
JONES KAREN DALE
PO BOX 167
LAKE TOXAWAY,NC 28747 -0167
8523 -29- 5734 -000
436 - 312
LEE GEORGE B & JANICE
218 S BROAD ST
BREVARD, NC 28712
' 12' Wattle 35343_21908624 -000
I I �
Silt Check Type A
Silt Basin Type B
1 4 ^^ 2'x3'x7' w /baffle
L

End Of Project 42 +60
3% Gravel Drive
Low and end point measures must
be installed in all silt fences
12
JONES DORIS
PO BOX 167
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0167
8883_295187 -000
13
JONES DORIS
Po BOX 167
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -0167
8523 -28- 4602 -000
436 - 309
14
GOSTIN EVA MARIE
3% 101 N CLEMATIS ST STE 409
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 -5556
8363 - 2315174 000
�I
SR1307 Page 9
T
0
I m I -
� o� n
x SHELTON WARREN STANFORD
RR IBOX 237
Fence LAKE TOXAWAY,NC 28747 -9743
x 8523 -28- 0933 -000
290 - 550
+ Proposed offset cul -de -sac
`^ with 35' radius
x Gr el Dri e
I�
48
981
I I 12' Wattle
12' Wattle
�O\
\e 1
oI
►i
11 2J
an4
nI�
1
nn
Propose 20' x
15° HDPE
� \ride
10
12° Wattle
SHELTON WARREN STANFORD
RR [BOX 237
LAKE TOXAWAY, NC 28747 -9743
8523 -29 -1544 -000
376 - 303