NC0037508_Pretreatment Compliance Insp_20000713

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
F AYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
July 13, 2000
Lisa Adams
Pretreatment Coordinator
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
P.O. Box 1927
Carthage, NC 28327
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County
Dear Ms. Adams:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Report for the inspection conducted on May 10, 2000. The report indicates that
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant continues to meet the pretreatment
requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900 for Local Pretreatment Programs.
You are commended for your success in maintaining your. program in such a manner
that has ensured the best water quality possible to the stream as well as maintaining
the NPDES permit limits.
The report is self-explanatory and contains observations and recommendations.
If you or your staff have any questions or require clarification, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone] extension 340.
Sincerely,
Lam_
Dale Lopez
Environmental Specialist II
/di
Enclosures
cc: DWQ Pretreatment Unit
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BLD. FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 5O% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
2. Control Authority Representative: Lisa Adams .
3. Title(s): Laboratory Supervisor/Pretreatment Coordinator ^�
4. Last Inspection Date: 6/3/99 Inspection Type (Circle One): PCI L"udtt)
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)?
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions?
Order Type And Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? Yes / No
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
JNJ
Program NPDES Number
1NICIO 1013171510181
MM/DD/YY
05 / 10 / 00
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
JP1
(TYPI)
Inspector
JSI
(INSP)
es% No
Yes /6)
Fac.Type
J1J
(FACC)
7. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
3
S1US
8. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
2
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0.
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10.
01
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP or With an Expired IUP?
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs In SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC).
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs. in SNC for Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods.
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs. in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods?
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What' are the parameters and how are these problems being addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial Discharge
(Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased Sludge Production,
Etc.)?
If Yes, How Are These Problems Being Addressed?

19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last
2 Semi -Annual Periods) not been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for Limits: None
SNC for Reporting: 0
Not Published: 0
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an Order, Has a
Signed copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
None
21. Are any Permits or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which Ones? YES NO
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files and complete the
following:
Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headwork Analysis (HWA)
07/10/98
04/01/03
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
03/01/99
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
10/07/97
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
04/27/98
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP
09/02/98
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies?
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated From or Added, to the LTMP?
If Yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
s /INo
Yes i
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? Yff No
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? Yes No Is the Table Adequate? Yes No

INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (UP) FILE REVIEW
26. User Name
1. Indersoll-Rand
2. Erico
3. Intek
sr 1
..f.
}}QQ(( . DUOS File Contain CLlI1CIIt PeLIn.
7
Permit Expiration Date?
.
06/30/03
06/30/03
06/30/03
30.
Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR 413, Etc.) or N/A
433
433
N/A
31. Does the File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year
Prior to Permit Issue Date?
Yes /0
Latest is 2/10/93
es o
Mar 24, 1998
esGNo
Apr 3, 199
32. Does the File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar
Year?
No
April 30, 1999
e o
May 21, 1999
lY '/No
May 24,'9
33. a. Does File Contain A Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. &/ No
b. Yes / No �4�
a/No
b. Yes/No �AJ
a. 57N
b. Yes/N
A
34. For 40 CFR 413 And 433 TTO Certifiers, Does The File Contain A
Toxic Organic. Management Plan (TOMP)?
Ye.)/ No N/A
L-�
Yes&
Yes
��
35. a. Does the File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the
Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
J 17, 1998
as)/ No
b. es No N/A
rJ,,,uc/7;z
a. es ' o
b.eo
a. e
b.
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW
Complete its Sampling as Required by IUP?
es' No
No
es o
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody's?
es / No
Yes/No
&s/No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete
its Sampling as Required By IUP?
es No N/A
es/No
es\)No
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
e;1 No N/A
Ye/,,No
GNo
40. . During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
Yes / No ,1/4 l
(�/
Yes/N p
' � 9)
Yes i
* j
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
.YesY No/ N/A
.Yes; No/ N/A02)
Yes/No/ 0
N/A )
/)
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of any Violations (Per ERP)?
Yes)/ No . N/A
Yes/N /.9.,
/N A

43.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
YesOfn
Yes/No e/P
Ye No
44.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
Yes /No/ /
Yes/No 0
N/A
45.
Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
Yes / N N/
Yes/No //9 g
N/A
46.
Does the File Contain Proof of Penalty Collection?
Yes / No N/A
Yes/No < '
j N/A
)
47.
a. Does the File Contain any Current Enforcement orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.Yes / No
b.Yes / No /A
Yes/No /
d
Ufa
44)9
48.
Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining any of this
Requested Information for You?
Ye / No
Yes Tom
Ye No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS
PCI Comments:
This facility has a well -organized pretreatment program. Files are neat and organized.
Requirements:
Recommendations:
NOD: YES NO
NOV: YES NO
QNCR: YES NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory X Marginal Unsatisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY: Dale Lopez, Environmental Specialist II Date: 05/10/00