NC0037508_Pretreatment Inspection_20021115

ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
November 15, 2002
Dennis Brobst
Moore County Public Works Director
P.O. Box 1927
Carthage, NC 28327
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County
Dear Mr. Brobst:
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted on October 24, 2002. The report indicates that Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
meets the pretreatment requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900 for the Pretreatment Programs.
The report is self-explanatory and contains observations and recommendations. We appreciate the
cooperation of Lillian Stephens, Pretreatment Coordinator.
This report is self-explanatory and contains observations and recommendations. If you or your
staff have any questions or require clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Dale Lopez
Environmental Specialist
/dl
Enclosure: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Lillian Stephens, Pretreatment Coordinator, Moore County WPCP
Dana Folley, DWQ Pretreatment Unit
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street— Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone]/FAX: [phone] Internet:" www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
2. Control Authority Representative: Lillian Stephens •
3. Title(s): Laboratory Supervisor/Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 04/30/02 Inspection Type (Circle One): PCI Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)?
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions?
Order Type And Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? Yes / No
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
JNI
Program NPDES Number
JNICIO 101317151018f
MM/DD/YY
10 /24 /02
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
l_13_1
ITYPI)
Inspector
1_3_1
(INSP)
Yes
/ No
Yes /
No
Fac.Type
LU
(FACC)
7. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
3
SIUS
8. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
2
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10.
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP or With an Expired IUP?
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs In SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC).
0
PSNC
•
14. Number of SIUs in SNC for.Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods.
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods?
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the parameters and how are these problems being addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial Discharge
(Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased Sludge Production,
Etc.)?
If Yes, How Are These Problems Being Addressed?
No
No

19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods) not
been Published for Public Notice? (May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an Order,
Has a Signed copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are any Permits or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication?
If Yes, Which Ones?
SNC for Limits: 0
SNC for Reporting: 0
Not Published:
0
0
No
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files and complete the following:
Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headwork Analysis (HWA)
07/10/98
04/01/03
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
03/01/99
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
10/07/97
.
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
04/27/98
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
09/02/98
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies?
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated From or Added to the LTMP?
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring?
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent?
Yes
Is the Table Adequate?
Yes
No
Yes
1Yes

26.
User Name
1. Indersoll-Rand
2. Erico
3. Intek
27.
IUP Number
SP01 II
A005 I
. A004
28.
Does File Contain Current Permit?
Yes
Yes
Yes
29.
Permit Expiration Date?
06/30/03
06/30/03
06/30/03
30.
Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR 413, Etc.) or N/A
'433
433
N/A
31.
Does the File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year
Prior to Permit Issue Date?
Yes
04/14/98
Yes
03/24/98
Yes
03/27/98
32.
Does the File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar
Year?
Yes
Yes
Yes
33.
a. Does File Contain A Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. Yes
Rev. 05/18/98
b. N/A
a.Yes
rev. 02/10/99
b. N/A
a. Yes
rev.04/30/96
b. N/A
34.
For 40 CFR 413 And 433 TTO Certifiers, Does The File Contain A
Toxic Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
35.
a. Does the File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a.Yes
b.Yes
a.Yes
b. Yes
a. Yes
b. Yes
36.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
Yes
Yes
Yes
37.
Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody's?
Yes
Yes
Yes
The SIUs are sampled monthly by the POTW
38.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete
its Sampling as Required By IUP?
Yes
Yes
Yes
39.
Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
Yes
Yes
Yes
SIUs send POTW a monthly sheet
40.
During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
None
None
None
41.
a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations
Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
a. N/A
b. N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
42.
Was the SIU Promptly Notified of any Violations (Per ERP)?
N/A
N/A
N/A

43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
No
No
No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
N/A
N/A
N/A
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
N/A
N/A
N/A
46. Does the File Contain Proof of Penalty Collection?
N/A
N/A
N/A
47. a. Does the File Contain any Current Enforcement orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a. N/A
b. N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining any of this
Requested Information for You?
No
No
No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS
PCI Comments:
1. Intek might close; it contributes approximately 5% of the flow to the POTW. Possibly the phase out will occur by fi-
end of 2003. If so, please send an SIU drop request letter to Dana Folley, Pretreatment Unit.
2. The PT Coordinator had excellent SIU correspondence logs.
Requirements:
Recommendations:
1. Upgrading the computer tracking of data would enhance productivity.
2. Intek is not a 40 CFR 413 or 433. Since only the 413's and 433's are required to have TTO, Intek probably did not need
TTO on their IUP. Please check with Dana Folley, Pretreatment Unit.
NOD: N�
NOV:
QNCR:
NOI
NOI
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ✓ Marginal
PCI COMPLETED BY:
isfactory,
Dale Lopez. Environmental Specialist ate: 11/15/02
Name and Signature of Reviewer Agency/Office/Telephone
Belinda Henson
.,Q
2rrK>t.>'+J
Date
NCDENR/Fayetteville/[phone] 11/15/02

INDUSTRY INSPECTION CODING:
No Industrial Inspection was conducted during the PCI Inspection
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Type
1 N 1 LNI CI0 Io 1 1 1 1 1 1 // 1I l 1_a_l
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
1.Industry Inspected:
2.Industry Address:
3.Type of Industry/Product:
4.Industry Contact: Title:
Phone:
Fax:
5.Does the POTW use The Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? Yes / No
6.Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview
B Plant Tour
C. Pretreatment Tour
D. Sampling Review
E. Exit Interview
Industrial Inspection Comments: