20081666 Ver 2_More Info Received_20130503

Strickland, Bev
From: Charles Johnston [cjohnston @ESINC.CC]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 10:49 AM
To: Strickland, Bev
Cc: Lucas, Annette
Subject: Ricky Beal PCN
Attachments: Beal PCN editable.pdf
Hi Beverly,
I believe you should have been forwarded the PCN for the "Ricky Beal subdivision ". I've attached the editable pdf
version of the PCN here.
This crossing was originally permitted in 2008 but not installed —the layout and impacts now are unchanged from 2008.
I've also got a call into Annette; as the client doesn't have any actual building plans for his homesites yet, I just used an
arbitrarily large value of 20,000 sq.ft. of impervious surface, which on a 5 acre lot only comes out to 9 %. I'm hoping this
is an acceptable approach.
The client is under a time constraint as his permits from Chatham County run out on July 1, so if you have questions or
need additional information please let me know anything I can do to help expedite the process.
Thanks for your help.
Charlie
S'E16 W1.111.
Charles S. Johnston, PWS, MBA I Senior Scientist
524 S. New Hope Road I Raleigh, NC 27610
919 - 212 -1760 Office 1 919 - 619 -4732 Mobile
ESI Website I Read ESI News I Follow Us on Twitter I ESI Green News Blog
Confidentiality Notice: The information and all attachments contained in this electronic communication are privileged and confidential information, and intended only for the
use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately of the error by return e -mail and please
permanently remove any copies of this message from your system and do not retain any copies, whether in electronic or physical form or otherwise. Thank you.

\N A T�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Ricky Beal subdivision
2b.
County:
Chatham
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Pittsboro
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Joseph R. Beal and Deborah Beal
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book 1327, page 0938
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
1469 N Main Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Goldston NC 27252
3f.
Telephone no.:
919 898 4346
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
beal.ricky @yahoo.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Charles S. Johnston
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Environmental Services, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
524 S. New Hope Road
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh NC 27278
5e.
Telephone no.:
919 212 1760
5f.
Fax no.:
919 212 1707
5g.
Email address:
cjohnston @esinc.cc
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN 9784 -81- 5737.000 and 9784 -81- 3564.000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.78539 Longitude: - 79.04026
1 c.
Property size:
10 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
B. Everett Jordan Lake
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV, B; NSW, CA
2c.
River basin:
Cape Fear
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The tract is in secondary forest of mixed pine and hardwood. Surrounding land is primarily single - family residential.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,900
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Improvements to driveway (including culvert grade) as needed to access property (Lots 6A and 6B on accompanying site map).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Paving of access driveway as necessary to access property (Lots 6A/6B). Standard heavy equipment for grading and paving will be used.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary Q Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (If known): James Lastinger
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other: LISACE, Raleigh Regional Office
4d.
Action
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
ID # 200801701, dated July 9, 2008
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Previous Section 404 (AID # 200801701) and Section 401(DWQ # 08 -1666) expired July 9, 2010 without permitted work being performed.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
LIT to Jordan Lake
PER
Corps
3
28
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
28
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑X Other:Jordan Lake
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 P
Widening of driveway
UT to Jordan lake
No
840
560
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
840
560
61. Comments: The proposed activity is classified as Allowable by the Table of Uses given in 15A NCAC 02b.0267. Applicant believes that no
practical alternative exists, as crossing the stream cannot be avoided and a bottomless culvert or bridge is not economically feasible.
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Crossing is located at an existing culvert to minimize the overall length of stream impacted. Pipe and dissipater pad are sized to be the minimum
length necessary to provide adequate roadway width and maintain non - erosive flow velocities.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All work will be done 'in the dry' or using a temporary coffer dam. The new culvert is pre -cast reinforced concrete with no 'live curing' of concrete in or
around the stream. All necessary sediment and erosion control BMPs will be installed and maintained through construction. Disturbed ground will be
restored and stabilized with permanent vegetative cover.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes Q No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
9%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes Q No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This
project is a Low Density development. Impervious surface for the total project and for any individual lots
will remain below 24 %. Percentage
given
above is calculated for each 5 -acre lot with 20,000 sq.ft of rooftop, sidewalks, driveway and other impervious
areas at build -out.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
n/a
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
0 No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
[]Yes
0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
0 No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
DYes
❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Improvements to this driveway will increase the likelihood that the adjacent lots will be developed. However, these will also be low-
impact ( <24%
impervious surface) projects with no anticipated further impacts to jurisdictional waters necessary.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All
wastewater generated on these lots will be treated using on -site subsurface sewage systems (i.e. septic tank and drain field).
Septic fields and
repair areas have been approved and are depicted on the site plans.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Search of records held by the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) revealed no occurrences for any federally - listed species within a 2 mile radius.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Search of records held by the N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reveals no occurrences of cultural or historic resources within a 2 mile
radius of the project site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Floodplain Mapping Information Services (http: / /floodmaps.nc.gov /fmis /)
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10