Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141255 Ver 3_More Info Requested_20210617From:Snider, Holley To:Bobby Billingsley; Tony Sydes Cc:Jessop, Jordan E CIV USARMY CESAC (US); Hall, Rhonda B; Musial, Connor E; Hall, Christine; Barbee, William C; Lee, Craig J; Racine, Douglas W Subject:RE: Pipe Crossing Question @ Stone"s Landing Onslow Bay Date:Thursday, June 17, 2021 5:08:00 PM Attachments:image005.png image007.png image008.png Good day Bobby, As a follow-up to our phone conversation, please see the email chain below regarding the proposed pipe crossing at Verranzo Court in Section VI of Stone’s Landing in the Onslow Bay subdivision near Jacksonville. I have attached the conditions of the GC 4256 that applies to the USACE NW 29 for culverts in streams and wetlands. The II. General Conditions, specific condition #11 listed below applies to this feature which is a delineated wetland and an ephemeral stream. The culvert crossing will need to be re-design to comply with the conditions of the DWR general certification listed below. Based on the need to redesign this culvert to comply with the conditions listed, the DWR 401 application is on-hold until the additional information requested is received. 11. Culverts shall be designed and installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not altered and allow for aquatic life movement during low flows. The dimension, pattern, and profile of the stream above and below a pipe or culvert shall not be modified by widening the stream channel or by reducing the depth of the stream in connection with the construction activity. The width, height, and gradient of a proposed culvert shall be such as to pass the average historical low flow and spring flow without adversely altering flow velocity. If the width of the culvert is wider than the stream channel, the culvert shall include multiple boxes/pipes, baffles, benches and/or sills to maintain the natural width of the stream channel. If multiple culverts/pipes/barrels are used, low flows shall be accommodated in one culvert/pipe and additional culverts/pipes shall be installed such that they receive only flows above bankfull. Placement of culverts and other structures in streams shall be below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20% of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than or equal to 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. If the culvert outlet is submerged within a pool or scour hole and designed to provide for aquatic passage, then culvert burial into the streambed is not required. For structures less than 72” in diameter/width, and topographic constraints indicate culvert slopes of greater than 2.5% culvert burial is not required, provided that all alternative options for flattening the slope have been investigated and aquatic life movement/connectivity has been provided when possible (e.g. rock ladders, cross-vanes, sills, baffles etc.). Notification, including supporting documentation to include a location map of the culvert, culvert profile drawings, and slope calculations, shall be provided to DWR 30 calendar days prior to the installation of the culvert. When bedrock is present in culvert locations, culvert burial is not required, provided that there is sufficient documentation of the presence of bedrock. Notification, including supporting documentation such as a location map of the culvert, geotechnical reports, photographs, etc. shall be provided to DWR a minimum of 30 calendar days prior to the installation of the culvert. If bedrock is discovered during construction, then DWR shall be notified by phone or email within 24 hours of discovery. Installation of culverts in wetlands shall ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions. When roadways, causeways, or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges shall be provided to maintain the natural hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in destabilization of streams or wetlands. The establishment of native woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques shall be used where practicable instead of rip-rap or other bank hardening methods. Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b); 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) Justification: Surface water quality standards require that conditions of waters be suitable for all best uses provided for in state rule, and that activities must not cause water pollution that precludes any best use on a short-term or long-term basis. Ensuring that in- stream structures are installed properly will ensure that surface water quality standards are met and conditions of waters are suitable for all best uses. Please feel free to call or email me if you have any questions ro I may be fo asssitaance to you in any way. Sincerely, Holley Snider .·´¯`·.¸><((((º>·´¯`·.¸¸..><((((º>.·´¯ Environmental Specialist II Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Phone: (910) 796-7304 127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Wilmington, NC 28405 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From: Hall, Christine <Christine.Hall@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 2:51 PM To: Snider, Holley <holley.snider@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Jessop, Jordan E CIV USARMY CESAC (US) <Jordan.E.Jessop@usace.army.mil>; Hall, Rhonda B <rhonda.hall@ncdenr.gov>; Musial, Connor E <connor.musial@ncdenr.gov> Subject: RE: Pipe Crossing Question @ Stone's Landing Onslow Bay Hi Holley, We do not yet have Stone’s Landing Section VI. Thomas Engineering tried to submit Stone’s Landing Section IV through the Fast Track ATC program but were not able to accept it yet due to overlap in project areas. (The Fast Track ATC program is one where we do not conduct a review of the design and they promise they know what they are doing.) So if we are talking about the same section, this design in what I understood to be a low density development is somewhat concerning. Are they proposing curb and gutter in this area? I included the requirements of a low density project (if that is what they intended to submit as) found in 15A NCAC 02H.1003(2) below. I also included Rhonda and Connor with Erosion Control so they are aware of your concern. The sub-items specific to the situation likely are (b) and (c): 15A NCAC 02H.1003 (2) DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS. Low density projects shall meet the following minimum design criteria: (a) DENSITY THRESHOLDS. Low density projects shall not exceed the low density development thresholds set forth in the stormwater programs to which they are subject pursuant to Rules .1017, .1019, and .1021 of this Section. For projects subject to the requirements for Non-Coastal High Quality Waters and Outstanding Resource Waters, dwelling unit per acre may be used instead of density to establish low density status for single-family detached residential development as set forth in Rule .1021 in this Section; (b) DISPERSED FLOW. Projects shall be designed to maximize dispersed flow through vegetated areas and minimize channelization of flow; (c) VEGETATED CONVEYANCES. Stormwater that cannot be released as dispersed flow shall be transported by vegetated conveyances. A minimal amount of non-vegetated conveyances for erosion protection or piping for driveways or culverts under a road shall be allowed by the permitting authority when it cannot be avoided. Vegetated conveyances shall meet the following requirements: (i) Side slopes shall be no steeper than 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) unless it is demonstrated to the permitting authority that the soils and vegetation will remain stable in perpetuity based on engineering calculations and on- site soil investigation; and (ii) The conveyance shall be designed so that it does not erode during the peak flow from the 10-year storm as demonstrated by engineering calculations. (d) CURB OUTLET SYSTEMS. Low density projects may use curb and gutter with outlets to convey stormwater to grassed swales or vegetated areas. Requirements for these curb outlet systems shall be as follows: (i) The curb outlets shall be designed such that the swale or vegetated area can carry the peak flow from the 10-year storm at a non-erosive velocity; (ii) The longitudinal slope of the swale or vegetated area shall not exceed five percent, except where not practical due to physical constraints. In these cases, devices to slow the rate of runoff and encourage infiltration to reduce pollutant delivery shall be provided; (iii) The swale's cross-section shall be trapezoidal with a minimum bottom width of two feet; (iv) The side slopes of the swale or vegetated area shall be no steeper than 3:1 (horizontal to vertical); (v) The minimum length of the swale or vegetated area shall be 100 feet; and (vi) Low density projects may use treatment swales designed pursuant to Rule .1061 of this Section in lieu of the requirements specified in Sub-items (i) through (v) of this Item. Christine Hall, PE Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources – State Stormwater Program North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Office: 910 796 7215 Direct: 910 796 7339 Email: christine.hall@ncdenr.gov Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Wilmington, NC 28405 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Snider, Holley Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 2:32 PM To: Hall, Christine <Christine.Hall@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Jessop, Jordan E CIV USARMY CESAC (US) <Jordan.E.Jessop@usace.army.mil> Subject: FW: Pipe Crossing Question @ Stone's Landing Onslow Bay Christine, Do you have a moment to chat about this or to share the rule citation for coastal stormwater that would prevent this design? Based on the comments below, the NCDOT will support our recommendations. I want to be sure I have appropriately cited the reasons for putting the project on hold and requiring the re-design. I did not see Stone’s Landing Section VI in BIMS so I am not sure if this most recent section has been submitted for sormwater review and assigned a reviewer. Thanks in advance. Holley Snider .·´¯`·.¸><((((º>·´¯`·.¸¸..><((((º>.·´¯ Environmental Specialist II Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Phone: (910) 796-7304 127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Wilmington, NC 28405 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From: Racine, Douglas W <dracine@ncdot.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 1:14 PM To: Snider, Holley <holley.snider@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Lee, Craig J <cjlee@ncdot.gov>; Cumbo, Daniel R <drcumbo@ncdot.gov>; Barbee, William C <wcbarbee@ncdot.gov> Subject: FW: Pipe Crossing Question Ms. Snider, Please see the comments from our Hydro Unit which addresses the pipe system concern. NCDOT will leave it up to the Engineer to work out your concerns on his the design of this crossing. Once you have approved his design we will review for Subdivision plan approval. If you have any questions please contact Craig Lee Hydro Unit reviewer, or myself. Mr. Lee is Cc: on this email. Thank you, Douglas W. Racine Deputy District Engineer Division 3 District 1 North Carolina Department of Transportation Direct Line: 910-467-0502 Main Line: 910-467-0500 dracine@ncdot.gov 295 Wilmington Hwy. Suite A Jacksonville, NC 28540 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Lee, Craig J <cjlee@ncdot.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 11:41 AM To: Racine, Douglas W <dracine@ncdot.gov> Cc: Barbee, William C <wcbarbee@ncdot.gov> Subject: RE: Pipe Crossing Question Doug, I have reviewed this crossing and my comment is that the pipe will need to be laid inline with the channel approaching and leaving the roadway. See image below. I will defer to the regulatory agencies for all requirements in order for the developer to receive permit approval. If updates are required, then these changes will need to be reviewed by our unit before NCDOT plan approval. Let me know if you need anything further. Thanks, Craig J. Lee, PE Engineer III – Eastern Operations North Carolina Department of Transportation Hydraulics Unit 919 707 6708 office cjlee@ncdot.gov US Mail: 1590 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Physical Address: 1000 Birch Ridge Dr. Raleigh, NC 27610 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Racine, Douglas W <dracine@ncdot.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 9:41 AM To: Lee, Craig J <cjlee@ncdot.gov> Cc: Cail, William G <gcail@ncdot.gov>; Barbee, William C <wcbarbee@ncdot.gov> Subject: FW: Pipe Crossing Question Craig, Please give me a call when you get back to discuss. DEQ has concerns with the design. Thank you, Douglas W. Racine Deputy District Engineer Division 3 District 1 North Carolina Department of Transportation Direct Line: 910-467-0502 Main Line: 910-467-0500 dracine@ncdot.gov 295 Wilmington Hwy. Suite A Jacksonville, NC 28540 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Barbee, William C <wcbarbee@ncdot.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 9:03 AM To: Racine, Douglas W <dracine@ncdot.gov> Subject: FW: Pipe Crossing Question Doug, See attached William C. Barbee Engineering Specialist II Jacksonville District Office NCDOT Division 3 910 467 0504 Direct Line 910 467 0500 office 910 346 8030 fax wcbarbee@ncdot.gov 295 Wilmington Hwy Jacksonville, NC 28540 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. _____________________________________________________________ From: Snider, Holley <holley.snider@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 8:59 AM To: Barbee, William C <wcbarbee@ncdot.gov> Cc: Hall, Christine <Christine.Hall@ncdenr.gov> Subject: FW: Pipe Crossing Question Thanks so much for the discussion this morning and passing this along to the hydro division. I have attached the maps for the Onslow Bay subdivision. There has been a slight modification to the lot out layout however, the crossing locations remain the same. Sincerely, Holley Snider .·´¯`·.¸><((((º>·´¯`·.¸¸..><((((º>.·´¯ Environmental Specialist II Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Phone: (910) 796-7304 127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Wilmington, NC 28405 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From: Snider, Holley Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 8:25 AM To: Barbee, William C <wcbarbee@ncdot.gov> Subject: Pipe Crossing Question Good morning Chris, Sorry I missed your call. I had a question regarding the attached pipe crossing design that is proposed at the Onslow Bay subdivision off Rocky Run Road in Jacksonville. Please call me at your convenience to discuss. Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Holley Snider .·´¯`·.¸><((((º>·´¯`·.¸¸..><((((º>.·´¯ Environmental Specialist II Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Phone: (910) 796-7304 127 Cardinal Drive Ext. Wilmington, NC 28405 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.