20130464 Ver 1_401 Application_20130413

WITHERS &- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 1o1
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
(910) 256 -9277
FAX [phone]
T0: NC Division of Water Quality — 4o1 Wetlands Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street; a Floor
Raleigh, NC 276o4
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of Letter
LEER 00 F TRANSM7TAL
DATE 4/26/13
1 108 NO. 02130094-00
ATTENTION Ms. Karen Higgins
PHONES 919-807-6363
RE: Kuester Property NWP 18 PCN Submittal (Courtesy)
4/26/13
02130094.00
NWP 18 PCN (Courtesy Copy)
1
COPY
02130094.00
® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Change order ❑ Diskette ❑
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
4/26/13
02130094.00
NWP 18 PCN (Courtesy Copy)
1
/2 /13
02130094.00
CD of PCN
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
❑ Resubmit
❑ Submit
❑ Return
_ copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
REMARKS:
COPYTO: Fi le
SIGNED: Troy Beasley
Ifenc%sums are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

WITHERS RAVEN EL
April 26, 2013
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Dave Shaeffer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
NC- Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
1650 Mail Service Center.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Kuester Property - ±8.o acres — NWP 18 PCN Submittal
W &R Project #02130094.00
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of John and Patricia Keuster, W &R is requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP
18 for 0.0012 acres of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and 32 if (0.0022 ac) of
permanent impacts to streams for the construction of a 14' wide driveway to access the northern
uplands for construction of a single family residence. This PCN is being provided to DWQ as a
courtesy notification.
The parcel is ±8.o acres in size (PIN 0744048755) and is located on Carpenter Upchurch Road,
approximately 1600 if northwest of the intersection of Carpenter Upchurch Road and Louis Stephens
Drive in Cary, Wake County (Latitude: 35.796164 °N; Longitude: - 78.862583 °W). The project is
located in the Neuse River basin and onsite waters drain to Crabtree Creek. The Water Quality
Classification for Crabtree Creek is C; NSW and the Stream Index Number is: 27-3341)• The
cataloging unit for the site is 03020201.
Project History
Onsite wetlands were delineated by Withers and Ravenel on March 19th, 2013. Information
supporting the delineation, including wetland data forms, have been provided as an Appendix. We
are requesting a Preliminary JD for the permitting of the driveway crossing.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.0012 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 32 if (0.0022 ac)
of permanent stream impacts for construction of the culverted driveway crossing and rip -rap
dissipater pad on the downstream end of the culvert. The construction of the house will not result in
wetland impacts.
There are no proposed impacts to Neuse River riparian buffers.
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravene[.com I License No. C -0832

Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Impacts to streams and wetlands have been minimized to only those necessary to access the
northern uplands in order to construct the house. The driveway crossing has been designed to cross
the wetlands /stream at a perpendicular angle to minimize impacts.
Mitigation
Because the proposed permanent wetland impacts are less than o.10 acres and the proposed
permanent stream impacts are less than 150 If, we do not believe that mitigation should be
required.
The current request is for 0.0012 acres of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and 32 if
(0.0022 acres) of permanent impacts to jurisdictional streams (see the attached maps and PCN for
details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• Wetland Location Exhibit
• USGS Quad and Wake County Soil Survey
• JD Supporting Information (Corps Application Only)
• Impact Exhibits
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 2 of
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

o�oF w a rF9o�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Kuester Property - ±8.0 acres
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Cary
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Patricia & John Kuester
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB: 12342; Page: 1483
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
105 Maude Court
3e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27519
3f.
Telephone no.:
610 - 316 -9026
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
TKuester55 @aol.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e.
Telephone no.:
910 - 256 -9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910 - 256 -2584
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley @withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0744048755
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.796164 °N Longitude: - 78.862583 °W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
±8.0 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Crabtree Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW (Stream Index #:27- 33 -(1)
2c. River basin:
Neuse (HUC 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site currently consists primarily of active agriculture land, with a pond and undeveloped woodlands in the
southern portion of the parcel. The general land use in the vicinity consists of agriculture and residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
±0.10 acres of wetlands
±0.7 acre of surface waters (pond)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±170 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a driveway crossing in order to access the northern uplands for
construction of a single family residence.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist of construction of a 14' wide driveway in order to access the northern uplands for construction of a
single family house. The driveway crossing will require a XXX" culvert, with a rip -rap dissipater pad placed on the
downstream end of the culvert to reduce flow to non - erodible levels.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
Impact #2
® Yes
® Corps
El El
Fill /Culvert
Headwater Forest
El No
® DWQ
0.0012 ac
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.0012 ac
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact #1
Fill /Culvert
UT to Crabtree
El PER
® Corps
3'
32 If
® P El
Creek
® INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
32 If
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P)
or Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Driveway crossings less than 25' in width that impact less than 2500 sq feet of riparian buffers are exempt and
do not require written authorization.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts have been minimized to only those needed for the driveway crossing to access the northern uplands for construction
of the house. The driveway has been designed to cross the wetlands, streams and buffers at a perpendicular angle to
minimize impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed project does not require a stormwater management plan
❑ Yes ® No
because less than 1.0 acres will be disturbed, and therefore, diffuse flow is not
required.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
5%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Cary
® Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
A Stormwater Management Plan is not required as the proposed project will impact less
than 1.0 acres.
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8of10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project consists of the construction of a house and driveway on a privately owned parcel,
and will not be a
catalyst for future development that could impact downstream water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Town of Cary
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
F-1 Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W &R reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http: / /portal.ncdenr.org /web /nhp /nhp- map- viewer,
to identify if there were any known occurrences of federally listed endangered species on or near the proposed project.
The review of the NHP database did not identify any recent occurrences of endangered species or critical habitat on the
subject property or within 2.0 miles of the project. Furthermore, the project site consists primarily of agricultural land, and
no endangered species or suitable habitat within or adjacent to the project site.
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters in Wake County classified as EFH.
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W &R reviewed the SHPO database, located at http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb/ to identify any known archeological or
culturally historic resources on or near the project site. The review of the SHPO database did not identify any
archeological or cultural resources within the project area. Furthermore, there were no historic buildings observed within
the project site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — W &R
��-�--
<S
Authorized Agent
4/26/13
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

WITHERS RAVENEL
fKGI14EER5 E PLANNERS i SLRVFYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner(s) John and Paticia Koester (Client) does hereby appoint Troy Beasley
1 Withers & Ravenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, etc.) for: a) review and approval
of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface waters, riparian
buffers, etc.) and /or-, b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental permit
applications/requests for the ±8_0 acre parcel on Carpenter Upchurch Road (PIN
0744048755).
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests /applications and the required supplemental
materials-,
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Date:
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: Signature of Client: �d= ir'?-C
Troy Beasley / Withers & Ravenel, Inc. , f lrJ YCxC._�— 1 i�rl ire i ('f ,a
(N me - Pri t) (Title)
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101 �` �
Wilmington, NC 28403 (Signatur
Tel. [phone] � c cLj? �-
Mailing Address
� tic D r7 IS' 10;
City State Zip
Phone: ('7DLDL
Email: / t.. e TS 6? a o1, Coo�
115 MacKenan Drive' Cary, NC 27511 tel.: [phone]? fax: [phone]; www.withersravenel.com License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive Suite 101. Wilmington, NC 28403. tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road'; Suite G: Greensboro, NC 27409 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT,
USGS QUAD MAP &
WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY

Avp
i1
i
I
r
k
x
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch a 200 ft,
1,•
A .
ol
KUEGER PROPERLY - ±8.0 AC TOPOGRAPHIC EXHIBIT
WITHERS RAVENEL
LMOIMIIRi I PLANN {R! I SURVIVORS
CARY WAKE COUNTY NORII I CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
--� 1 0 300 600
1 inch = 600 ft.
el" IV
Rp
ol
el
ON
I per
11
L �•.�, iR 4 �i
r
-�
USGS QUAD - CARY WITHERS RAVENEL
KUEGER PROPERTY - ±8.0 AC 18614[[R: ! PLARRRR! t SURVIVORS
L.�ItY LYAi:I [:pU tilY !r'UY I I I CnNUI[tin

C rG
4f
•
GrC,2
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
CrB 1 inch = 400 ft.
.a
a
ow I
J
G rQ
r
y
' 41 �
Grc
w� --
KUEGER PROPERTY - ±8.0 AC WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 45 WITHERS RAVENEL
RNRINRRRS 1 PLANNRR! I SURVEYOR!
i:5 tVnl(L (')Lrr iY WOR7i1 CALLpLIrJA
i fll

JD SUPPORTING INFORMATION

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
John and Patricia Kuester
105 Maude Court
Cary, NC 27519
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State-NC County /parish /borough: Wake County City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.796164 °W, Long. - 78.862583 °W .
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Crabtree Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: N/A
Non - wetland waters:
Stream (Within Impact Area) - 32 linear feet : 3' width (ft)
Cowardin Class: Riverine - Intermittent
Stream Flow: Intermittent
Wetlands: 0.0012 acres (Within Impact Area)
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
►C•TiMIroM5
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
1

request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
2

Z Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant: Withers & Ravenel.
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant. Withers & Ravenel
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Cary Quad —
1:24,000
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation -Wake County Soil Survey (1970) — Sheet 45
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):2010 Aerial Photos.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Preliminary JD Inventory Table
Estimated Amount
Class of Aquatic
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
of Aquatic Resource
Source
in the Review Area
Wetland
Section 404
(Within Impact
35.789544
- 78.862639
Riverine
0.0012 acres
Area
Wetland
Stream
Within Impact
35.789544
- 78.862639
Riverine
±321f
RPW -
Intermittent
Area

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern rMountains and Piedmont
projecttsite: ue 4er City/County: ��r_ r Wo- k-P-- Sampling Date: 3
Applicant/Owner: t — State: arJG Sampling Point:
Investlgator(s): — Section, Township, Range:
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): _CokICCLU Slope ( %): /
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): � Long:
Lat:. a� a
-J
Soil Map Unit Name: LDAtn NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V/ No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks: r
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
aeeonua y n��cur_s im1111mum or rwo_requireQl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is re uired• check all that a 1
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
drogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
�aturatlon (A3)
izolldized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
t-ieia uoserva[rons:
Surface Water Present? Yes No VIIDepth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Al— No Depth (inches): r�
Saturation Present? Yes / No Depth (inches): 5 Q Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 1 No
(includes caoillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
�J� �co was preSm`�.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
I r HDSOiure uommanr maicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 C rc f e-) % Cover Species? Status
1. �
2. id' �� Y � e rS/ N Flo
!� �. cR.n loa.i �� rR r °
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
=Total Cover
Saplina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3t5 rcirc(e- )
1. l�cQ,r rtLbrr.�r►n 1S% Y i ,#c-
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
6.
9.
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum ( Plot size: (0 '411
c rC f e-
1. GnIA- a d )ecx-
2. }
3.
4.
5.
6
2-S7. = Total Cover
= Total Cover
3o1 o L; FAG
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: V R
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species O
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 00 /a
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A)
{FS)
Prevalence Index = B/A = I
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >5o% f
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in, DBH and greater than 3.26 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �(
Present? Yes / " No
fro � .�-G V
P y
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: P� l
Proflle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color I t % Color (moist) % TV08 Lac Texture _ Remarks
6-9 1dYft- Loam
S- I4f 10 M V , 9'8io I-Sl'ILYN A% C M Loa rn
D= DeDlation. RM= Reduced Matrix. MS =M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
` / resew --��
an: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 4tY 'Prop
City/County: COW u%Q- l-f-- Sampling Date: 31L%
Applicant/Owner: i 0.
r State: NL Sampling Point: �P
Investigator(s):
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Local relief r ^nnnclave, convex, none): G?JCfLV e- Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L Lat: _
S + 79 9 SV� 'V Long: — 111I. & Z4139 0 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:
L0614 NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _ No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
` ► t s�icx r�-E- i s 1 o ct��e� I n if (�S @ �o-Ff A, �
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Inc inalo[s (minimum of lvai re u� irecll
Prima Indicators mini um fi one is re aired check all that a I
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
J Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
�r
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches): !F r
r�
Saturation Present? Yeses No
Depth (inches): I&
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes cwillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
W` 1,L ,S h yk, (d11 was lm � prps -e-4-4--
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tres Stratum (Pint size:
1.J Qd r r�
d - )
Absolute
% Cover
0 %p
Dominant Indicator
Soecies7 Status
`T FAC Li
2.
3.
4.
1 wcL_
I s� /�
N FigG
5.
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
6.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
7.
8.
,r
SayIInQ /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3d t2adius)
1. alLeArels 6G4
7Sgo
rf7 /a
= TatalCaver
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
AA
/
_ I _ _ )
,�
_
= Total Cover
2.
3.
--
4.
5.
6.
7.
6.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
woody vine Stratum (Plot size: l art �.0
3.
4_
5.
6,
= Total Cover
numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: -pp- ?!
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant I'
Species Across All Strata: `T (B)
Percent of Dominant Species p
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: 5 �O (A/B)
Prevalence index warKSneet:
Total % Cover of:
Miilliply bv:
z
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for HydrophyBc Vegetation
?92 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
`C- on GAS ho 7- preSQ e
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: D ;)' z
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture _ Remarks
a - [o�X V s s I_0CXA_%
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol(Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
educed Matrix, MS =Masked Sand Gralre. Location: PL =Pare Linln M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
C, 'G So t,15 wa&j2-
rno—� P resen. 4,
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No JIC
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

IMPACT EXHIBITS

\WILLIAM & UPCHURCH
\D.B. 103!, \PG. 103'
�11LLIAMI6. /uPdHURCH / j j / / / e� / / /' /' —� \ P0,. \0723.82 -05� -7 68
\ \ 1 I I D.Br 1 35J PG. 103 1 1 / \\
FIN: 107 3.82 -65– 70�
; ro ,'/ / ,' ,' ,'' ,'/ LOT
7'949 RES \
>.
0
POND 01 �/� /' y0 0
A�
\ I /
PROPOSED
\\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ POND IMPACTS
.10 R
IMPACT SUMMARY
PERMANENT
IMPACT
INTERMITTENT
#1 STREAM IMPACT
32 LF - 96 SF (0.0022 AC)
PERMANENT
LOT 1 1 / IMPACT
\ 2 WETLAND IMPACT
Aso \��• �\ _ P _PCISED�1 '\ \` \\ \ J/ I\ \`\ / / ` \I \ \\ 509 SF (0.0012 AC)
DRIVEWAY
S s 'p
1 '
�—-- \ -- - - - - -- \ 1 /
GRAPHIC SCALE
It 400 0 200 400 800
1 inch = 200 ft.
No. Revision Date B y � saie
WMI WTED LOYD BUILDERS WITHERS & RAVENEL she "
�� OVERALL IMPACT MAP
cne�ked ey
JET loe NO a �� ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
nos D211031 Cary Wake County North Carolina

I M PACT #1 `� \
POND \ \ \ \
` 42" \
CULVERT \\ J�� /
INTERENT
�RtP- RAllCERGY STREAM \
\ \ DISSIPATER \
/0 a
\��- -ice/ \S�0• \.N,�T �`ti \
PROPOSED 14' \ V7 \
WIDE DRIVEW'Ai` �\ \
76,\ �� \
J
78, e� \
PERMANENT IMPACTS
IMPACT #1 : INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT = 32 LF - 96 SF (0.0022 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0
1 inch = 50 ft.
LOYD BUILDERS WITHERS &- R"F -NEL
IMPACT #1 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Cary Wake North Carolina

\LQ N
IMPACT #2 `� \
POND \ \ \ \
\ / 42„ \
\ \ CULVERT
RIP -RAP ENERGY \ R €RENNIAL\
\� \ DISSIPATE -R.-- \ SlKfiAM
PROPOSED 14' \ V7 \
WIDE DRIVEW'Ai` �\ \
76,\ �� \
zz 04
J
78, e� \
PERMANENT IMPACTS GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0
IMPACT #2: WETLAND IMPACT = 509 SF (0.0012 AC)
1 inch = 50 ft.
LOYD BUILDERS WITHERS &— R"F —NEL
IMPACT #2 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Cary Wake North Carolina

LOYD BUILDERS
415
410
405
UPSTREAM
0 +00 0 +50
415 DOWNSTREAM
- --
i ---
i
i
410
(1) 42" RCP
405 0 +00 0 +50
415
410
405
415
410
405
LOCATION
EXISTING
PROPOSED
GRADE
INVERT
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAM
408.0
407.9
407.0
406.9
AQUATIC PASSAGE DETAIL
J
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0
1 inch = 50 ft.
WITHERS &- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS