20130470 Ver 1_401 Application_20130513

April 30, 2013
John Thomas
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Sue Homewood
N.C. Division of Water Quality
WBSCP Unit
512 North Salisbury Street, Archdale 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Hanes Mill Road Landfill Haul Road
Jurisdictional Determination and Nationwide Permit No.14 Request
Forsyth County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern:
201 30470
�E�ElVE ;
MAY 2 2013
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR), on behalf of our client, the City of Winston -Salem (City), is
requesting a verification of jurisdictional waters and authorization to construct a haul road under a Nationwide
Permit No. 14 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3886 in Forsyth County, NC (Figure 1
and Figure 2).
Project Description
The City purchased property north of their Hanes Mill Road Landfill, across Ziglar Road, to use as a clay
borrow source for use in the landfill base and cap liner system. This property will also be used as an area to
manage and stockpile operational soil for the landfill. A gravel haul road will be constructed to transport borrow
through the landfill property. A 36 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) will be installed across an unnamed
tributary to Grassy Creek to accommodate the haul road. Permanent fill impacts to jurisdictional waters will
result from the installation of the RCP and associated rip rap apron.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S
HDR performed a field assessment to document jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within the proposed project
area. The area was examined according to the methodology described in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, USACE Post - Rapanos guidance, the USACE Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Regional Supplement, and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Guidance. Our
reconnaissance revealed that one Relatively Permanent Water (RPM with perennial flow (Stream 1) and an
abutting forested wetland (Wetland 1) were located onsite (Figure 3).
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
440 S Church Street Phone: [phone]
Suite low Fax: [phone]
Charlotte, NC 28202 -1919 www.hdrinc.com
/'M911di

Stream 1 was identified as an unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek. Grassy Creek is a tributary to Mill Creek
which flows into Muddy Creek, a major tributary to the Yadkin River. Channel dimensions included bankfull
widths ranging from 5 to 6 feet with bank heights varying from 2 to 6 feet. The forested hardwood riparian
buffer ranged from 5 to 10 feet in width along the right bank adjacent to the landfill cell, to greater than 50 feet
in width along the left bank. Ordinary high water mark (OHWM) indicators included sediment deposition, the
presence of litter and debris, wrack lines, sediment sorting, and scour. Completed USACE forms, a NCDWQ
form, and representative photographs are attached. A summary of delineated waters is presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Delineated Waters of the U.S.
Delineated Delineated
Delineated Features Classification
Length
Stream 1 RPW wl Perennial Flow 1,000 -
UT to Grassy Creek
Wetland 1 Forested Wetland - 0.01
Total: 1,000 260
Wetland 1 is an approximate 0.01 acre forested wetland located in the floodplain of an unnamed tributary to
Grassy Creek (Stream 1). Dominant vegetation consisted of red maple (Acer rubrum), tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), ironwood (Carpinus carohniana), Nepalese browntop (Microstegium vimineum), and
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides). Soils exhibited hydric indicators including low chroma matrices
and redox features within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile. Hydrology for this wetland is predominantly
provided by a high groundwater table. Primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are present and
include a high water table, saturation, and geomorphic position. Completed Eastern Mountain Regional
Supplement Data Forms for the wetland and adjacent upland and representative photographs are attached.
Proposed Impacts
A 36 -inch RCP and associated rip rap apron will result in approximately 148.5 If of permanent fill impacts to an
unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek (Sheet OOC -11). The culvert was re- aligned to avoid Wetland 1 and will be
placed 20 percent below the stream bed elevation to maintain low flow passage of water and aquatic life
movement. The rip rap apron below the outfall will be buried at the original stream bed elevation and will
dissipate flow and protect the downstream channel.
Sediment erosion control measures will be employed throughout the duration of the project. Contractors will
utilize a pump around or other diversion mechanisms to minimize excavation in flowing water. A summary of
permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters is presented in Table 2.
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas

Table 2.
Permanent Im acts Summary
Impact Jurisdictional Feature Type of
Length (If)
Stream 1 Fill 36 -inch RCP 123.5
UT to Grassy Creek Fill (Rip Rap Apron) 25
Total: 148.5
Agency Corresgondence
Cultural Resources
HDR reviewed the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) GIS database and found that no known
historical structures or historic districts are located within the proposed Project Area. Correspondence (dated
June 13, 2012) was sent to the N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) requesting information on any
archeological or cultural resources that may be impacted by the proposed construction. A letter was received
from SHPO on July 3, 2012 stating that after conducting a review of the project they are aware of no historical
resources that would be affected by the project (see attached).
Federally Protected Species
HDR obtained a list of federally protected species from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) website
( htta:// nc- es.fws.gov /es /countvfr.html) last updated on December 26, 2012. Table 3 lists three federally
protected species for Forsyth County.
Table 3.
Federally Protected Species Identified in Forsth Coun
Present Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status Habitat
Clemm s muhlenbergii I Bog turtle I T (S/A) No
Picoides borealis I Red - cockaded woodpecker E No
Cardamine micranthera I Small - anthered bittercress E No
Notes:
E A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or significant portion of its range"
T (S /A) A taxon "that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with another listed species and is listed for its
protection."
Habitats surveyed were determined by each species' ecological requirements. Our onsite visit revealed that
there was no suitable habitat present for any federally protected species. HDR also consulted the N.C. Natural
Heritage Program ( NCNHP) Element Occurrence database and GIS shapefiles for Forsyth County. According
to the NCNHP data, no species have been observed within 5 miles of the proposed project area. The
proposed project is not anticipated to impact any federally protected species or Critical Habitat.
Correspondence (dated June 12, 2012) was sent to USFWS requesting review and comment on any possible
issues that may emerge with respect to federally protected species, migratory birds, or other resources
associated with the project. The USFWS issued a letter on July 16, 2012 stating that no federally protected
species or their habitats will be affected by the proposed project.
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas

We hereby are requesting a Jurisdictional Determination Verification for the unnamed tributary to Grassy
Creek and an abutting wetland, and authorization to construct under a Nationwide Permit No. 39 and 401
WQC No. 3886. Enclosed herein are:
Agent Authorization Form
➢ Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Project Vicinity (Figure 1)
USGS Rural Hall Quadrangle (Figure 2)
➢ Delineated Jurisdictional Waters (Figure 3)
➢ NRCS Soils (Figure 4)
➢ Site Plan and Profile (Sheet OOC -11)
➢ NCDWQ Stream Identification Form
➢ USACE Stream Quality Assessment Form
➢ Wetland Determination Data Form — Eastern Mountain and Piedmont
➢ Representative Photographs
SHPO Concurrence Letter
USFWS Concurrence Letter
Thank you in advance for your assistance. If you have any questions or require additional information after
your review of the enclosed information, please contact me at (704) 973 -6878 or eric.mularski(andrinc.com.
Respectfully,
Eric Mularski, PWS
Environmental Scientist
CC: Mr. Ed Gibson, PE, City of Winston -Salem
Mr. Michael Plummer, PE, Senior Project Engineer, HDR Engineering, Inc.
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
I, Ed Gibson, representing the City County Utilities, hereby cerpfies that I have authorized Eric
Mularski, representing HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas, to act on my behalf and take actions
necessary to the processing and issuance of the Nationwide Permit 39 associated with the Hanes Mill
Road Landfill Borrow Area project located in Forsyth County, North Carolina.
Ed Gibson
Applicant's Name
Applicant's Signature
6/14/2012
Date
NOR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
Eric Mularski
Agent's Name
L. - wJ;:z- � � �
A�enPs Signature
6/13/2012
Date
440 S Church Street
Sufte 1000
Charlotte, NC 282D2 -1919
Phone: [phone] -SM
Fax [phone]
www.hdrinc.com

\,ot WA L4 9p
o �
201 30470
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre- Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in4ieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in4ieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Hanes Mill Road Landfill Haul Road
2b. County:
Forsyth
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Winston -Salem
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
City of Winston -Salem
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book: 2064 and Page No. 2702
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
1080 Ziglar Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Winston - Salem, NC 27102
3f. Telephone no.:
2 7013
3g. Fax no.:
Mg
I tN4RvyAtf
3h. Email address:
=tt
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
ITY �
ancn

A
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Municipality
4b. Name:
Mr. Ed Gibson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Winston -Salem
4d. Street address:
325 W. Hanes Mill Road
4e. City, state, zip:
Winston - Salem, NC 27105
4f. Telephone no.:
336 - 661 -4903
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Eric Mularski
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
5c. Street address:
440 South Church Street, Suite 1000
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202 -1919
5e. Telephone no.:
704 -973 -6878
5f. Fax no.:
704 - 338 -6760
5g. Email address:
edc.mularski @hdrinc.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

a
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
6819 -71- 7086.00
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.192 Longitude: - 86.295
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
approximately 333.3 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Grassy Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Grassy Creek (Class C)
2c. River basin:
Yadkin River Basin (HUC 03040101)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
According to the land cover land use classification adopted by North Carolina, the project property and surrounding
properties are classified as mixed upland hardwoods, managed herbaceous cover, and deciduous shrubland. These land
uses are consistent with current aerial imagery and a recent onsite visit.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
HDR delineated approximately 0.01 acres of wetlands on the property. Additional wetlands may exist within the FEMA
100 year floodplain of Grassy Creek but were not delineated. No grading or construction activites are proposed within
these areas.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
It is estimated that approximately 1,500 linear feet (If) of a perennial unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek and
approximately 1,700 If of the main stem of Grassy Creek flows through the property.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The City of Winston Salem (City) purchased property north of their Hanes Mill Road Landfill across Ziglar Road to use as
a borrow source for clay to be used in landfill base and cap liner system. This property will also be used as an area to
manage and stockpile operational soil for the landfill. A gravel haul road will be constructed to transport borrow through
the landfill property. A 36 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) will be installed across an unnamed tributary to Grassy
Creek to accommodate the haul road. Permanent fill impacts to jurisdictional waters will result from the installation of a
36 -inch RCP and associated rip rap apron.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project involves the installation of approximately 123.5 linear feet (If) of 36 -inch RCP and approximately 25
If of rip rap apron below the pipe outfall. Standard excavating equipment including excavators and bull dozers will be used
to construct the haul road for the surrounding borrow area.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
0 Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
[4d.—`f yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
El Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) ) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 SPOT
Fill (36 -in RCP)
UT to Grassy
Creek
® PER
❑ IN
® Corps
® DWQ
6
123.5
S2 SPOT
Fill (Rip Rap
UT to Grassy
® PER
® Corps
6
25
Apron)
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ IN
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
[_-] PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
148.5
3i. Comments: The City proposes to install a 36 -inch culvert in an unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek to accommodiate a haul
access road to transfer borrow from the source across Ziglar Road to the existing Hanes Mill Road Landfill. A rip rap apron will
be installed below the proposed pipe outfall in order to dissipate flows and to protect the downstream channel. This will result
in approximately 148.5 If of permanent fill impacts to an unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 []POT
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Permanent fill impacts to an unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek are unavoidable due to the existing site conditions
constraints. Culvert length and rip rap apron was shortened to lowest extent feasible to accommodate the proposed haul road.
The culvert was re- aligned to avoid Wetland 1 and will be placed 20 percent below the stream bed elevation to maintain low
flow passage of water and aquatic life movement. The rip rap apron below the outfall will be buried at the original stream bed
elevation and will dissipate flow and protect the downstream channel.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment and erosion control measures including silt fence will be employed through out the duration of the project.
Contractors will utilize a pump around or other diversions mechanisms to minimize excavation in flowing water.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
❑Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
less than 24 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project requires a stormwater management plan required by the City of Winston - Salem. The city will forward the
authorization to NCDWQ once it is approved.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemment's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Winston -Salem
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HOW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project does not involve wastewater discharges.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

...
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes No
❑
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Raleigh
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Obtained an updated list of federally protected species from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) website
( http:// nc- es.fws.gov /es /countyfr.html) on June 11, 2012.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) GIS coverages and database search.
An onsite survey revealed that the site does not exhibit habitat for any federally protected species.
HDR requested review and comment from USFWS on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to federally
protected species (dated June 13, 2012). The USFWS issued a letter on July 16, 2012 stating that no listed species or
their habitats will be affected by the proposed project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fish Habitat GIS coverage
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) National Register listed properties GIS coverage and database search.
HDR requested review and comment from SHPO on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to
archaeological or cultural resources (dated June 13, 2012). SHPO conducted a review of the project and are aware of no
historical resources which would be affected by the project (ER 12- 1033), letter dated July 3, 2012.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
FEI Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map Panel No: 6819
Eric Mularski
&irin
4/30/2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
VA 's Si nature
Date
Page 11 of 12 L--
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

� M
(Agents signature is valid only if an authonzation letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1 1 2 1 3 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 8
STA110N
ROAD
3
824'
123 5 LF 38 3
1 1
«<O - - - - - - - -- — - -
Z 821' - - - - - --- - -- --
1 RC
P 01 4x
I _
11485'
PROFILE
HORIZ - 1' -40', VERT. 1' =10'
NOTE REFERENCE ELEVATIONS
ARE IN NAVD88 VERTICAL DATUM
;�vn d
ROCK CHECK DAMS
RCP
ENDWALL (SEE SHEET OOS -01
FOR DESIGN DETAILS)
CLASS 1 RIP RAP OQOU�OvO w
DEPTH 2'
d50 =0 9' /'�
SEE CHARTS
FOR DIMENSIONS
RIP RAP OUTLET PROTECTION
NTS -
/- Z i
123 5 LF 38' RCPT014�
ENDWALL (SEE SHE OOS -01 \
FOR QESIGN DETAIL ---N
STREAM 1 (UNNAMED
TRIBUTARY TO GRASSY CREEK)
LIMITS OF,DISTURBANCE j GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD
u
% O
//
Ilool
/
- ST
25' -50' LANDWARD
BUFFER
0'-25' UND(
/ LIFTER -'
eos mo.rr.b, r
aaCre.n.
,� J
1 =ton
j
8
- n Ti/
-- n'- --
l �
N�
WETLAND 1
(0 05 AC )
1 RIP RAP OUTLET
PROTECTION
—END (SEE SHEET GOS -01-
ESIGNDDETAILS) _
`5'- UNDISTURBED
UFFER.
PROJECT MANAGER IM D
CM
`.PtN1CAROr���i
a
No"It" fit
S oIN • SP CFl J•TON�
A. THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PLANTING REGIME FOR THE PIEDMONT
REGION
B DURING PERIODS OF OVERLAPPING DATES, THE KIND OF SEED TO BE USED SHALL
BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER
C. PERMANENT SEEDING
1 AUGUST 1 THROUGH JUNE 1
a. CREEPING RED FESCUE 18LB /ACRE
b BIG BLUESTEM. 8LB /ACRE
c. INDI NGRASS: 6LB /ACRE
d SWITCHGRASS- 4LB /ACRE
e RYE GRASS 35LB /ACRE
I. FERTILIZER: 50OLB /ACRE
g UMESTONE. 400LB /ACRE
2 MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1
o CREEPING RED FESCUE- 18LB /ACRE
b BIG BLUESTEM 8LB /ACRE
c INDIANt4WS: 6LB /ACRE
d. SWITCHGRASS: 4LB /ACRE
e GERMAN OR BROWNTOP MILLET 35LB /ACRE
f FERTILIZER' 500 LB /ACRE
g LIMESTONE 4000LB /ACRE
D TEMPORARI SEEDING - THE ENGINEER WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT DATES FOR
USING EA KIND OF SEED
1 MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1
a GER MILLET OR BROWNTOP MILLET 40LB /ACRE
b FERTI ZER 40OLB /ACRE
2 SEPTEM ER 1 THROUGH MAY 1
a RYE(GAAIIN) 50LB /ACRE
b FERTILIZER 40OLB /ACRE
EXISTING GRADE
1
CHANNEL LINING.
GRASS WITH TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
GRASS LINED CHANNEL n
NTS -
- li07E5. I
FABRIC TO BE ANCHORED IN THE L.
_ TRENCH WITH COMPACTED
BACKFILL AT LEAST 8- DEEP
\, \ POSTS TO BE MIN OF FILTER FABRIC
\ 2' -0' IN GROQND SEE NOTE 1-
\,` BRACE POSTS WHERE
NECESSARY
100 YEAR FLOODPWN _
ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE WITH
STAPLES OR METAL RINGS
POST SHALL BE 8' METAL POST WEIGHING
1.33 LB PER LINEAR FOOT
A. LV
` SILT FENCE DETAIL NCDENR 882
NTS
Win4�j.mw West. a.poea
MANES MILL ROAD LANDFILL
ZIGLAR ROAD PROPERTY BORROW /STOCKPILE
AREA AND ACCESS ROAD EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
NIZED WOVEN
E z 14 GAGE
(00
LANDFILL ACCESS ROAD PIPE CROSSING
PLAN AND PROFILE
0 1 • 2' FILENAME I OOC -07 dwg SHEET
SCALE AS SHOWN OOC
D
C
B
IA

a
2
g
4
I
D
O
2
2
STATION
PROFILE
HORIZ - 1"-40'. VERT I'-10'
3
ZIIGLAR ROAC
- -
SF
4
5
6
�i't)lur corclrlrernue
A THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PLANTING REGIME FOR THE PIEDMONT REGION
B DURING PERIODS OF OVERLAPPING DATES, THE KIND OF SEED TO BE USED SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER
C PERMANENT SEEDING
1 AUGUST 1 THROUGH JUNE 1
a CREEPING RED FESCUE: 18LB /ACRE
b BIG BLUESTEM BLB /ACRE
e INDLANGRASS 6LB /ACRE
d. SWfTCHGRASS 4LB /ACRE
e RYE GRASS: 35LB /ACRE
f FERTILIZER- 500LB /ACRE
g. LIMESTONE 400LB /ACRE
2 MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1,
a. CREEPING RED FESCUE: 18LB /ACRE
b BIG BLUESTEM 8LB /ACRE
e INDIANGRASS: 6LB /ACRE
d. SWITCHGRASS. 4LB /ACRE
e GERMAN OR BROWNTOP MILLET 35LB /ACRE
f FERTILIZER: 500 LB /ACRE
g LIMESTONE 4000LB /ACRE
D TEMPORARY SEEDING - THE ENGINEER WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT DATES FOR USING EACH KIND OF SEED
1 MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1
a. GERMAN MILLET OR BROWNTOP MILLET 40LB /ACRE
b FERTILIZER: 400LB /ACRE
2 SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH MAY 1.
a RYE(GRAIIN). 50LB /ACRE
b. FERTILIZER 400LB /ACRE
\ 123 5 -LF 36• -RCP 01.41L
-i
3�
HEADWAL / i Y •7 3 HEADWALL / WETLAND 1 \\
STREAM 1 (UNNAMED 1 / (0.05 AC) \ \
TRIBUTARY TO GRASSY CREEK) / _ RIP RAP -APRON -
Fm
NDII6oBaal4,e,0o
ae■e.aar■
PROJECT MANAGER M D. PLUMMER, P E.
1E MULARSKI
J GAUL
7
STILT FiNCE DETAIL NCDENR 882
NTS
0
9
MIN ta r
a, R • 1103 M[IiMt DOW" — a! NaED MN ME Mua uB 2 ~~ggg ti
.2° In aIA,mYana. m.o1. m n, m.a,. IM m o, 411 M,
CIA � am" „NDYT EO L& 01"', elM0 Ala Fn
l.Z.T I t.Y 1' -D•
up to omom m
Tam sm"IrARa,1 omtal
OR[ t
_ m"M ALL KimMMIM 4161 WON OEM MI- Atte
PON 00111 m AND daaD MIN AAMIC mIMNN1IM
TO AVE AIM IIIIII r MR CLUVACE
Doti l MI ,atIII 00 FIN AOOapY116 etTN � •>., III= IM
�i 0 /N7 M I • HIM Te�aY1aED tm M&MIMLL a JOB 411E By O�
omnuwm
�11I I ML ELUM% PFA=W " t6I Am 1e13.
r.D.: -- -- • MLMID me FAMIC &W IN 411111" Im HDN NEW
Y 1103 10 IN ma YEA OF Sim IN HY"m
(1�p) oNSEN Au Ca0= 1. 04 IIINE A ■Am110 a I•
e TWIN .41 FIN w na
IO ilNllf
Hm
7 m m eAN "IN At Sm TYE 112 —timme wa am ale D411 ®Y ma
Al e• en.nN oeBSM sin rtu wee lIN oHaa
$ FLEYATION �� m I,neAat we aY eta Y Y!EIMI) W
N W
n
r7-' 1 J
11 1°
IN
P "N d
maagj
e1LOT�ILLL oINBMB2oN8
34'
_
eIN. /ME
RIP RAP OUTLET
PROTECTION
�1
NTS
M D7A.
eAe eta
MI IR,
Ma1FT.l
D LPT.1
8'
Q
I
EN • s•
lsa/a.m
a.mra.a
l.ten.re
s.m/a.+e
a.mrs.m
I ae
NOTES II
I.ae/a.m
a.mn.a
I Ee/a.m
FABRIC TO BE ANCH6RED IN THE U
)
1 m
n • a•
TRENCH WITH COMP�MD
Il
,.m/a.m
2•z 4' GALVANIZED WOVEN
BACKFILL AT LEAST DEEP
ll
n a s•
WIRE 14 CAGE x 14 GAGE
POSTS TO BE MIN F FILTER FABRIC
2' -0• IN GROUND.
I.ro/e m
• mr4.te
I.m/s.an
SEE NOTE 1
POSTS WHERE
n e s•
(i
Q4
NECESSARY
e.mra.m
+o.mm.m
a.o
ATTACH FABRIC TO *RE WITH
a.mn.m
lJ
1A y.
l
STAPLES OR METAL RINGS
++.mrl+.le
a.e
)
POST SHALL BE 8' ETAL POST WEIGHING
e.mre.m
s.mn.m
8 (��
1 33 LB PER LINEAR F007
a.o
n • s-
a.ma.m
STILT FiNCE DETAIL NCDENR 882
NTS
0
9
MIN ta r
a, R • 1103 M[IiMt DOW" — a! NaED MN ME Mua uB 2 ~~ggg ti
.2° In aIA,mYana. m.o1. m n, m.a,. IM m o, 411 M,
CIA � am" „NDYT EO L& 01"', elM0 Ala Fn
l.Z.T I t.Y 1' -D•
up to omom m
Tam sm"IrARa,1 omtal
OR[ t
_ m"M ALL KimMMIM 4161 WON OEM MI- Atte
PON 00111 m AND daaD MIN AAMIC mIMNN1IM
TO AVE AIM IIIIII r MR CLUVACE
Doti l MI ,atIII 00 FIN AOOapY116 etTN � •>., III= IM
�i 0 /N7 M I • HIM Te�aY1aED tm M&MIMLL a JOB 411E By O�
omnuwm
�11I I ML ELUM% PFA=W " t6I Am 1e13.
r.D.: -- -- • MLMID me FAMIC &W IN 411111" Im HDN NEW
Y 1103 10 IN ma YEA OF Sim IN HY"m
(1�p) oNSEN Au Ca0= 1. 04 IIINE A ■Am110 a I•
e TWIN .41 FIN w na
IO ilNllf
Hm
7 m m eAN "IN At Sm TYE 112 —timme wa am ale D411 ®Y ma
Al e• en.nN oeBSM sin rtu wee lIN oHaa
$ FLEYATION �� m I,neAat we aY eta Y Y!EIMI) W
N W
n
r7-' 1 J
11 1°
IN
P "N d
maagj
e1LOT�ILLL oINBMB2oN8
FT.
�
eIN. /ME
eDl.leAB.
WIN. /4wI
eIN /ME.
WIN /WUl•
M D7A.
eAe eta
MI IR,
Ma1FT.l
D LPT.1
tl
Q
+.a
EN • s•
lsa/a.m
a.mra.a
l.ten.re
s.m/a.+e
a.mrs.m
I ae
n Nam
I.ae/a.m
a.mn.a
I Ee/a.m
s.m/s M
s.eo /a.M
1 m
n • a•
l.aera.m
a.mrJ.as
,.m/a.m
s.mrs.M
s.m/s.le
a o
n a s•
1 mra m•
mrJ.la
I.ro/e m
• mr4.te
I.m/s.an
a.e
n e s•
a.mro.m
4.mre.m
s.m/a.m
e.mra.m
+o.mm.m
a.o
n • e•
a.mn.m
B.mrs.m
a.fero.m
e.aara.n
++.mrl+.le
a.e
n • s•
ase /a.m
e.mre.m
s.mn.m
s.m/e.M
+a.mns.ae
a.o
n • s-
a.ma.m
s.mn.m
s.aen.m
e.mro.le
ls.mns ae
� e
n • s•
s.mro.m
s.ae/s m
s mre as
,a.mne la
a.o
n • e•
4.mre m
Lm/s m
a ma.m
n
w.vBne.M
e e
nee•
a.mn.m
l.mrs m
a.ae/J.m
l.aare n
u.mne.le
e o
n • e•
a.m/e.m
s.mre.m
asar4.m
f.mro.o
a.vsne.ro
wInston•8elem • FoteytA County LANDFILL ACCESS ROAD OUTFALL
/Cou* Mldes PLAN AND PROFILE
Nmpftw • SM— • Bend waste Dlapwal
HANES MILL ROAD LANDFILL
ZIGLAR ROAD PROPERTY BORROWISTOCKPILE AREA g ,. 2• FILENAME DOC –t t.dwg SHE
DRIVEWAY PERMIT
SCALE r.ao'
D
C
IA

Danbury
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Pine
�f Hall
Wainut
Cove<
King
µ�
G,ermunton
Rural Belews
Te�buc�,ar�,-ille
Nall -,leek
East
Bf-nd Proposed Project
Walkertown
3
v
L `
V
KemersviEls
Winston
Lev; i ;v ille
B�-vwvh Run
Salem
sue=.
x
y
r,
L
v
J
r.
Advance
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013
�� Vicinity Map
Figure 1
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions
City of Winston -Salem I Hanes Mill Road Landfill Haul Road I Nationwide Permit No. 14

Purchased Property
rq Landfill Parcel
J
lt"
f
emu, 7
�. A .rsfl'�r TkL'ss
•••���111fflii�� . . �'�.t +�S _�� J�
Ziglar Road
W-0
�
T� Rural Hall USGS Quadrangle
1 m.. Figure 2
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions
City of Winston -Salem I Hanes Mill Road Landfill Haul Road I Nationwide Permit No. 14

Delineated Jurisdictional Waters
aq Figure 3
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions
City of Winston -Salem I Hanes Mill Road Landfill Haul Road I Nationwide Permit No. 14

NRCS Soils Survey
I. Figure 4
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions
City of Winston -Salem I Hanes Mill Road Landfill Haul Road I Nationwide Permit No.14

NV IDWO Stream Identificatinn Form Versinn 4.11 C-�U U.t -tt>
Date: (p (! 0 t
Project/Slte: tr�S ` P
Latitude: p Ida
Evaluator. l,R.tC
County: �p�tA
Longitude: - Co, a115
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent
Stream Determination (cl
OtherR
Nx 18 or rennial if a 30•
Ephemeral Intermittent eren is
e.g. Quad Name: "
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thahNq
0
1
0.5
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool s uence
0
(../
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict flood lain
0
1
22. Fish
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
4T
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
d>
3
8. Headcuts
0
4T>
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5 Other
" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdmioav (Subtotal = IMS 1
12. Presence of Basefiow,
0
1
2
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
A6
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes zo
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = K 1
18. Fibrous mots In streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note dhrersity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
dp
1
2
3
22. Fish
®
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
&I>
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
off>
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5 Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: ti
Sketch:
51 (4T -Va e^PASSY CstF4*-) �� �►�

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
;,a,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: PAN of v�.aszott�_ ,M 2. Evaluator's name: fiLwc. AL4-Vz& -t
3. Date of evaluation: 'o !V 1 86 1a 4. Time of evaluation: 1130
5. Name of stream: To qtr 6. River basin: IADEAL
7. Approximate drainage area: Stream order: aaD
9. Length of reach evaluated: 1 I,CCD LF 10. County: Laaa
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex 34.8723t2): 3(o.19a Longitude (ex- 77.5s66It): -8 Alf
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS �►
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map iden ing streams) location):
�iF. RtffY�'1 f�� 1�IP�PS
14. Proposed channel work (if any): G.turvAa �w►ST o� l
15. Recent weather conditions:�_CotD
16. Site conditions at time of visit: C,-P`P 0.0 I'D
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? g>O If yes, estimate the water surface
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? �NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey ?(T NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: =% Residential _/o Commercial % industrial _/o Agricultural
JQ_% Forested J _0% Cleared / Logged _/o Other ( 1
22. Bankf ill width: )"O 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 0/6) Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 0/.)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight L Occasional bends ___Frequent meander _Very sinuous _,Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from
Evaluator's Signature Date O/ I Or I l iii I'd
This channel evaluation fo bin ded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form Is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

O
Vl
vI
r% ix,
CMA
V\
Cd
C-b
co
ca
CA
AZA
It^
CC\
Ca
cc
120Y
s
m
V
�V
5,7
Zf�
miTil,
"A
IP
31
"�
''►«
� -e
'Q�
>',
`O'
saa;:
r
!!i:
'A %,
Sys•
•.0
�`-
'qy
a: "s
'Q ";
t
'
=.t
;�
,p�Qe,,
C4
I-A
'y Y.
11"XI-a
It,
All,

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Hanes Mill Road Landfill Borrow Site City/County: Winston -Salem /Forsyth Sampling Date: 2/27/2012
ApplicantlOwner: City of Winston -Salem State NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): Eric Mularski Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) fioodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%) 'f2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat. 36.192 Long. 86.295 Datum:
Sod Map Unit Name: Ch- Chewacla NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 2�
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Vf No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Forested wetland adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek, a perennial Relatively
Permanent Water (RPW).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reawred:
check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
! Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqwtard (133)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
" Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 8
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC
2 Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Yes FAC
3
4
5
6.
7.
8.
30 = Total Cover
S6olma /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -ft )
1 Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC
2 Carpinus cerolmiana 20 Yes FAC
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
50 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size. 5 -ft )
1 Microstegium vimineum 80 Yes FAC
2 Polystichum acrostichoides 5 No FAC
3
4.
5.
6.
7
Sampling Point: DP1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of.
OBL species
Multiply bv:
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
8.
9 Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall
12.
85 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
)inches) Color (moist) % j ois) Tvoe'Loc2 Texture
0 -2 10YR 3/3 100 Gay loam
2 -20 10YR 5/2 60 7.5YR 40 RM M clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S7) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type.
Depth (inches):
Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Sampling Point: DP1
2Location• PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric soil indicators are present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes `� No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site. Hanes Mill Road Landfill Borrow Site City /County Winston -Salem /Forsyth Sampling Date: 2/2712012
ApplicantlOwner: City of Winston -Salem State: NC Sampling Point DP2
Investigator(s)• Eric Mularski Section, Township, Range:
Landforrn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): fioodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope ( %)• '42%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Let: 36.193 Long: 86.295 Datum
Soil Map Unit Name Ch- Chewacia NWI classification. None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Upland data point for Wetland 1.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primacy Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 8
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches) 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca ills fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available-
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 -ft ) % Cover ewes? Status
1 Lmodendron tulipifera 20 Yes FAC
2
3
4.
5
6.
7.
8.
20 = Total Cover
Saplina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
1.
2
3.
4
5.
6.
7
8.
9
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
11
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1 Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FAC
2
3
4.
5
6 _
5 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
Sampling Point: DP2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata. 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Cover
Total % of:
OBL species
Multiply by*
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals.
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %_ Color (moist) % .Tvne�Locr_ Texture Remarks
0 -2 10YR 3/3 100 clay loam
2 -20 10 YR 4/2 100 clay loam
'Type: C =Concentration,_ D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Linino. M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches).
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators are present.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No!
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

ED1.
visa varaana� a fly u "t u„3 F bite Nnotograpns - Hanes Mill Road Landtill Haul Road
Photograph #1- unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek upstream
Photograph #2 - unnamed tributary to Grassy Creek downstream

���c n��rn•vvl �r r �
%J I ` %j IL f-L L Ju "f' y ` ut "kfum - bite F'notoarams - Hanes MITI Koaa Lananil Haul Koaa
Photograph #3 — Wetland 1

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
July 16, 2012
Mr. Eric Mularski
HDR Engineering, Inc.
440 S. Church Street, Suite 1000
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Dear Mr. Mularski:
Subject: Endangered and Threatened Species Assessment, Proposed Landfill Expansion/Hanes
Mill Road Landfill Borrow Area, North of Winston Salem, Forsyth County, North
Carolina
On June 18, 2012, we received a letter from you requesting our review of the proposed project
site. The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661- 667e), and section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 -1543) (Act).
According to the information provided, the City of Winston Salem has purchased property
adjacent to the existing Hanes Mill Road Landfill to be used as a borrow source for clay. The
clay taken from the property will be used in landfill base and cap liner system and as an area to
stockpile operational soil. The City is proposing to install a culvert crossing in an unnamed
tributary to Grassy Creek to access the site.
Federally Listed Species - According to our records, no listed species or their habitats occur on
the site. We do not believe any endangered or threatened species or their habitats will be
affected by the proposed project; therefore, the requirements under section 7 of the Act are
fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new
information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical
habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a
manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is
determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Fish and Wildlife Resources - We are concerned about the direct and indirect impacts to
wetlands and streams and the potential effects to water quality from the proposed landfill
expansion. Nonpoint - source pollution can have harmful effects on drinking water supplies,
recreation, fisheries, and wildlife. The landfill expansion is in close proximity to the South Fork

Catawba River; thus, we are concerned that runoff from the landfill could have an effect on the
water quality of the river. Because the South Fork Catawba River is used as a drinking water
supply, we recommend the following measures be incorporated into the project plans in order to
minimize nonpoint - source pollution, potential adverse effects to water quality, and impacts of
this project on fish and wildlife:
1. Implement sufficient retention designs to allow for the slow discharge of
storm water. This will attenuate the potential adverse effects of storm -water
surges; thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical discharges.
Permanent storm -water retention ponds should be designed in accordance
with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Law (15A
NCAC 4). All storm -water outlets should drain through a vegetated upland
area prior to reaching any stream or wetland area.
2. Install and maintain stringent measures to control erosion and sediment in
order to prevent unnecessary impacts to aquatic resources within, and
downstream of, the project site. Disturbed areas should be reseeded with seed
mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife. Fescue -based mixtures should be
avoided. Native annual small grains appropriate for the season are preferred
and recommended. Perimeter erosion - control devices should be installed
prior to any on- the -ground activities. Frequent maintenance of these devices
is critical to their proper function in order to minimize sediment discharge
from the project site.
3. Preserve and/or restore forested riparian buffers. Given the close proximity of
this project to aquatic resources, we are concerned about the loss and lack of
riparian buffers. Forested riparian buffers, a minimum of 100 feet wide along
perennial streams and 50 feet wide along intermittent streams, should be
created and/or maintained along all aquatic areas. Riparian buffers provide
travel corridors and habitat for wildlife displaced by development. In
addition, riparian buffers protect water quality by stabilizing stream banks,
filtering storm -water runoff, and providing habitat for aquatic and fisheries
resources.
We strongly discourage the in -fill of 100 -year floodplains because it increases the potential for
flooding to adjacent and downstream properties and interferes with the natural hydrological
process of the waterways. We remind you that Executive Order 11988 provides direction to
federal agencies to minimize flood hazards and protect natural floodplain functions. Any
development that will impact the floodplain will need to be assessed.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at
828/258 -3939, Ext. 240. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4 -2 -12 -214.
K

Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor

I
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Banos, Admurustrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Govemor
Irnda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
July 3, 2012
Eric Mularski
HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas
440 South Church Street
Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202 -1919
Re: Hanes Mill Road Landfill Borrow Area, Forsyth County, ER 12 -1033
Dear Ms. Mularski:
Thank you for your letter of June 14, 2012, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and 11story
Division of 1-Iistoncal Resources
David Brook, Director
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
PC4-aL U
(Ramona M. Bartos
Location 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address. 4617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax [phone] -6599

sf
FM
-7
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
440 S Church Street, Suite 1000 1 Charlotte, N07/3202
M
Ir
SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS:
A. THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PLANTING REGIME FOR THE PIEDMONT REGION.
B. DURING PERIODS OF OVERLAPPING DATES, THE KIND OF SEED TO BE USED SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.
C. PERMANENT SEEDING
1. AUGUST 1 THROUGH JUNE 1:
a. CREEPING RED FESCUE: 18LB/ACRE
b. BIG BLUESTEM: 8LB/ACRE
c. INDIANGRASS: 6LB/ACRE
d. SWITCHGRASS: 4LB/ACRE
e. RYE GRASS: 35LB/ACRE
f. FERTILIZER: 500LB/ACRE
g. LIMESTONE: 400LB/ACRE
2. MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1:
a. CREEPING RED FESCUE: 18LB/ACRE
b. BIG BLUESTEM: 8LB/ACRE
c. INDIANGRASS: 6LB/ACRE
d. SWITCHGRASS: 4LB/ACRE
e. GERMAN OR BROWNTOP MILLET: 35LB/ACRE
f. FERTILIZER: 500 LB/ACRE
g. LIMESTONE: 4000LB/ACRE
D. TEMPORARY SEEDING — THE ENGINEER WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT DATES FOR USING EACH KIND OF SEED
1. MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1:
a. GERMAN MILLET OR BROWNTOP MILLET: 40LB/ACRE
b. FERTILIZER: 400LB/ACRE
2. SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH MAY 1:
a. RYE(GRAIIN): 50LB/ACRE
b. FERTILIZER: 400LB/ACRE
FAI
PROJECT MANAGER M.D. PLUMMER, P.E.
E. MULARSKI
J. GAUL
I PROJECT 'NUMBER)
M
ENIDWALL 01MENSIONS
>
4
M
C01
FM
-7
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
440 S Church Street, Suite 1000 1 Charlotte, N07/3202
M
Ir
SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS:
A. THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PLANTING REGIME FOR THE PIEDMONT REGION.
B. DURING PERIODS OF OVERLAPPING DATES, THE KIND OF SEED TO BE USED SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.
C. PERMANENT SEEDING
1. AUGUST 1 THROUGH JUNE 1:
a. CREEPING RED FESCUE: 18LB/ACRE
b. BIG BLUESTEM: 8LB/ACRE
c. INDIANGRASS: 6LB/ACRE
d. SWITCHGRASS: 4LB/ACRE
e. RYE GRASS: 35LB/ACRE
f. FERTILIZER: 500LB/ACRE
g. LIMESTONE: 400LB/ACRE
2. MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1:
a. CREEPING RED FESCUE: 18LB/ACRE
b. BIG BLUESTEM: 8LB/ACRE
c. INDIANGRASS: 6LB/ACRE
d. SWITCHGRASS: 4LB/ACRE
e. GERMAN OR BROWNTOP MILLET: 35LB/ACRE
f. FERTILIZER: 500 LB/ACRE
g. LIMESTONE: 4000LB/ACRE
D. TEMPORARY SEEDING — THE ENGINEER WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT DATES FOR USING EACH KIND OF SEED
1. MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1:
a. GERMAN MILLET OR BROWNTOP MILLET: 40LB/ACRE
b. FERTILIZER: 400LB/ACRE
2. SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH MAY 1:
a. RYE(GRAIIN): 50LB/ACRE
b. FERTILIZER: 400LB/ACRE
FAI
PROJECT MANAGER M.D. PLUMMER, P.E.
E. MULARSKI
J. GAUL
I PROJECT 'NUMBER)
36" RCP
3' 3' ,
HEADWALL
CLASS 1 RIP RAP
DEPTH 2'
d50=O.9'
d MAX= 1.4'
0, 0
0
C)
34'
arts illi���
11L, Ili, 111111 lli�il�
NTS
NOTES:
FABRIC TO BE ANCHORED IN THE
TRENCH WITH COMPACTED
BACKFILL AT LEAST 8" DEEP.
POSTS TO BE MIN. OF FILTER FA
2'-0" IN GROUND. SEE NOTE
BRACE POSTS WHERE
NECESSARY.
ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE WITH
STAPLES OR METAL RINGS.
POST SHALL BE 8' METAL POST WEIGf
1.33 LB. PER LINEAR FOOT.
Ln
N
�l
0AX WIT
WIRE
WIN-
�NIZED WOVEN
E x 14 GAGE
1 (010.)
SILT FENCE DETAIL
NTS NCDENR 6.62
NOTES
M, WA
3HE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE T4 WHOM,
S -IQ E i.
M
ENIDWALL 01MENSIONS
>
M
C01
>
MJN_ IMAX,
0
M
FT
M
VITNJKXC 1, 91IN-IMAX.
—(FT.)
V
BAR
SIZE
(TT
H2( T.)
0�
rw
36" RCP
3' 3' ,
HEADWALL
CLASS 1 RIP RAP
DEPTH 2'
d50=O.9'
d MAX= 1.4'
0, 0
0
C)
34'
arts illi���
11L, Ili, 111111 lli�il�
NTS
NOTES:
FABRIC TO BE ANCHORED IN THE
TRENCH WITH COMPACTED
BACKFILL AT LEAST 8" DEEP.
POSTS TO BE MIN. OF FILTER FA
2'-0" IN GROUND. SEE NOTE
BRACE POSTS WHERE
NECESSARY.
ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE WITH
STAPLES OR METAL RINGS.
POST SHALL BE 8' METAL POST WEIGf
1.33 LB. PER LINEAR FOOT.
Ln
N
�l
0AX WIT
WIRE
WIN-
�NIZED WOVEN
E x 14 GAGE
1 (010.)
SILT FENCE DETAIL
NTS NCDENR 6.62
NOTES
M, WA
3HE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE T4 WHOM,
S -IQ E i.
P.- i5ii ou 15, 18, 1ZD0 7,25M,215 14.00116.75
6.0 #5 0 8" 4.5015.00 7.5018.50 ii.:2514. 00 7:, 619.25 14.750116J,5d
CONCRETE WINGWALL
NTS
n
D
C
B
A
ENIDWALL 01MENSIONS
MJN_ IMAX,
Ul
FT
M-1 ijjV
VITNJKXC 1, 91IN-IMAX.
—(FT.)
PIPE DI A.
BAR
SIZE
(TT
H2( T.)
0�
1.0
#5
V. a
—a—d --
1 r . DO
2.0013.15
1.2611.75
3-0013-75
3,6013,75
6.1010.00
C6016. Is
Of
3,,0013,76 1,26/2,00
1.50
ff,5
a a
1.26� a
I G14,26
1.60f2.60
3.801:3.76
6. 6,016.76
2�O
#5
@
1. A-1-50
4, 0014 7-6
1 . 7612, 50
4AOA�46
7.6010.25
5.2515.75
610016,75
11.,50111, 75
MA-01113,25
-j
Lu
2.7513.5
3.5
#5 A 8`
SuMCSQ 600.M76 326MSO
4,0
7S-017.00
T P.6 —13
k-50
6�50ts.ls
49vm:
M�00/M28
tu,
w
4,5
#5
9 8"
C0,016.01)
6,6018,60
3.260.00
7A O/9,25
18.50116.76
U-
P.- i5ii ou 15, 18, 1ZD0 7,25M,215 14.00116.75
6.0 #5 0 8" 4.5015.00 7.5018.50 ii.:2514. 00 7:, 619.25 14.750116J,5d
CONCRETE WINGWALL
NTS
n
D
C
B
A

ENDWALL (SEE SHEET OOS-01
FOR DESIGN DETAILS)
""R""FILE NTS
ROCK CHECK DAMS
5
&n
6 I 7 I 8
SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS:
A. THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PLANTING REGIME FOR THE PIEDMONT
REGION.
B. DURING PERIODS OF OVERLAPPING DATES, THE KIND OF SEED TO BE USED SHALL
BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.
C. PERMANENT SEEDING
1. AUGUST 1 THROUGH JUNE 1
a. CREEPING RED FESCUE: 18LB/ACRf
b. BIG BLUESTEM: 8LB/ACRE
c. INDIANGRASS: 6LB/ACRE
d. SWITCHGRASS: 4LB/ACRE
e. RYE GRASS- 35LB/ACRE
f. FERTILIZER: 50OLB/ACRE
g. LIMESTONE: 400LB/ACRE
2. MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1:
a. CREEPING RED FESCUE: 18LB/ACRE
b. BIG BLUESTEM: 8LB/ACRE
c. INDIANGRASS: 6LB/ACRE
d. SWITCHGRASS: 41-13/ACR2
e. GERMAN OR BROWNTOP MILLET: 35LB/ACRE
f. FERTILIZER: 500 LB/ACR'El-_
g. LIMESTONE: 4000LB/ACRE
D. TEMPORARY SEEDING — THE ENGINEER WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT DATES FOR
USING EACH KIND OF SEED
1. MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER l-,
o. GERMAN MILLET OR BROWNTOP MILLET: 40LB/ACRE
b. FERTILIZER: 400LB/ACR.E
2. SEPTEMBER 1 THROUGH MAY 1:
a. RYE(GRAIIN): 50LB/ACRE
b. FERTILIZER: 400LB/ACRE
EXISTING GRADE,,
NTS
2161110
FABRIC TO BE ANCHORED IN THE LJ
TRENCH WITH COMPACTED
BACKFILL AT LEAST 8" DEEP.
POSTS TO BE MIN. OF
FILTER FABRIC
2'-0" IN GROUND.
SEE NOTE 1
BRACE POSTS WHERE
NECESSARY.
ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE WITH
STAPLES OR METAL RINGS.
POST SHALL BE 8' METAL POST WEIGHING
1.33 LB. PER LINEAR FOOT,
SILT FENCE
NTS
HDR Engineering, Inc.
of the Carolinas
N,C,f3,E,L.S, License Numben F-0116
440 3 Church Street, Suite 10001 Charlotte, k 28202
PROJECT NU
00162—
%
0
�Iao 1
Ili 1100
Vk
AX ITH
/o WI
TAI L
NCDEN.R 6.62
D
C
B
20130470
2 "x x 4'.' GALVANIZED WOVEN
WIRE 14 GAGE x 14 GAGE
IRS 24
TO
A
T, y
MAY 2013