NC0037508_Pretreatment Audit_20100813

ATA,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of WaterQuality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
August 13, 2010
Janna Scherer
Pretreatment Coordinator/Lab Supervisor.
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Audit Inspection
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508.
Moore County
Dear Ms. Scherer:
Dee Freeman
'Secretary
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Inspection Report for the
August 10, 2010 inspection of the pretreatment, records and files. An industrial
inspection was conducted at Pinnacle furnishings, Inc on August 11, 2010 in which I
met with you, Sherry Augustin (Office Manager), and Orlando Malave (Anodizing Line
Operator). The report indicates that Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
meets the pretreatment requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900.
We appreciate your co-operation and your continued efforts with the pretreatment
program. My complements to you on an excellent job of up-to-date record keeping and
organization of the. Pretreatment files. If you have any questions concerning this
report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
(Dale Lopez
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure: Pretreatment Audit Inspection Report
EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Dana Folley, PERCS -Pretreatment Unit
FRO files .;
225 Green St., Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Phone: 910 '433-3300 l FAX: [phone] Customer Service`. 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www,ncwaterqualij'.crg
One
1\ orthCaro]_ina
An Equal Opportunity ; Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
Background Information (Complete prior to audit; review Program Info Database Sheet(s))
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Moore County WPCP
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Janna Scherer
3. Title(s): Chemist/PT Coordinator/FOG Coordinator
4. Address of POTW:
Mailing: 1094 Addor Rd
City Aberdeen
Zip Code: 28315
Phone Number: 910-281-3146 Fax Number: 910-281-2047 E-Mail: jscherer(amoorecountync.gov
5. Audit Date 08/10/2010
6. Last Inspection Date: 12/17/2008 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ►1 Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ® Yes ❑ No
If Yes, Explain. Moore County WPCP experienced toxicity problems in September 2009 and October 2009 which
led to a failure for the quarter in November 2009. No reason for the failures was ever determined. The WPCP has
not experienced any further problems (passed in December 2009, March 2010, and June 2010). The next test will
be in September 2010.
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Parameters Covered Under Order
PCS (WENDB) Coding
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
INICI0 I0 13 17 15 )0 18 I 108I10 I10I IGI Ls_J 11
(DTIA) (TYP1) (INSP) (FACC)
10. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUS)?
11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUS)?
12. Number of SIUS Not Inspected by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
13. Number of SIUS Not Sampled by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
14. Enter Higher Number of 12 or 13
15. Number of SIUS in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
16. Number of SIUs with No IUP, or with an Expired IUP
17. Number of SIUs in SNC for Reporting During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
18. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
19. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SIUS
CIUS
NOIN
PSNC
NOCM
MSNC
20. Number of SIUs in SNC for Self -Monitoring Requirements that were Not Inspected or Sampled
0
SNIN
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
PaaP. 1

21. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of each Program
Element in their File, with all supporting documents and PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
11/1/10
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
11/2/05
/1 Yes ❑ No
11/4/05
►Z1 Yes ❑ No
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
8/22/08
// Yes ❑ No
11/5/08
/1 Yes ❑ No
9/1/13
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
5/31/07
1/ Yes ❑ No
10/16/07
►1 Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/30/08
11 Yes ❑ No
11/19/08
/1 Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
6/24/04
11 Yes ❑ No
7/13/04
11 Yes ❑ No
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
22. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
® Yes ❑ No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas. Camp MacKall Army Base
23. If yes to #22, Do you have current lnterjurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? /5 Yes ❑ No El NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division. A copy of the contract was sent to the FRO with the response to
the last pretreatment Audit in April 2004.
24. If yes to #22. Have you had any trouble working withthese towns or districts? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA
If yes, explain.
25. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 5/21/2007
26. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes
If yes, explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
27. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? /1 Yes ❑ No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
28. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
29. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
N/A
Resources
30. Please Rate the Following: S=Satisfactory M=Marginal. U=Unsatisfacto
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
11 S ❑M ❑U
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
Emergencies
1/S ❑M ❑U
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
IS ❑M ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
/IS ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
►IS ❑M ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
►1S ❑M ❑U
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
/5S ❑M ❑U
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
PP OP. 7

31. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain Yes or No. All data related to the pretreatment program is organized into Excel spreadsheets. LTMP data and
industry results and flows are entered monthly or accordingly.
32. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
Costs are recovered through sampling fees charged to industries. No Surcharges and no IUP fees are charged to the SIUs.
Public Perception/ Participation
33. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
34. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes 4 No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, how would the request be addressed? A request should be made in writing by the individual of
what they would like to review. The request would be reviewed by the Pretreatment Coordinator and the WPCP
Superintendent. Files would be available for review at a designated time and at the WPCP. A photocopy of the person's
driver's license will be made.
35. Has any industry ever requested that certain information remain confidential from the public? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain
procedure for determining whether information qualified for confidential status, as well as procedure for keeping files confidential
from public. If no. how would the request be addressed? A request would be made in writing by the SIU of what information
they want confidential. This would exclude all data related to the effluent from the SIU. All pretreatment information is
kept in a locked file cabinet.
36. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? /Z4 Yes ❑ No
37. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes ❑ No Information can be found in the Board of
Commissioners (BOC) meeting minutes.
38. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No industries in SNC.
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey-IWS)
39a...How does the POTW become aware of new or changed Users? The IWS is completed every 5 years but short forms
are sent to all new industries which may be found in the local news paper or on the Board of Commissioners
agenda. If an industry contacts the county, they are notified to contact the Pretreatment Coordinator at the
WPCP.
39b. Once the POTW becomes aware of new or changed Users, how does the POTW determine which industries have the
reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and therefore require a new permit or a permit revision? (Who is an
SIU?) As much information is obtained as possible through a short form and a long form survey, if necessary, a site
visit is performed, categorical classification is judged, an estimated flow is determined, sampling is performed for a
period of time if permitting is not required. An SIU is >25,000 GPD, meets categorical standards, a threat to the
WPCP or 5% MAHL.
40. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
Yes No If Yes, How many are there? 1- Transfer Station
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable. No current permit.
41. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) ® Truck ❑Dedicated Pipe ❑ NA
42. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (Example: designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) Each truck load is sampled for a pH and visually inspected by a WPCP representative, a
manifest must be filled out by the hauler and signed by a WPCP representative, and the waste must be dumped at
the designated location during the designated hours. Haulers are permitted annually to dump at the WPCP.
43. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ® Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
44. Review POTW's copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes ►1 No
If yes, what parameters are over allocated?
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Paae. 1

45. If yes to #43, what is being done to address the over allocations? (Short-term IUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
46. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, what percentage of each parameter >75% presently, and no lower than 10%
47. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (For example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes I No
If yes, explain.
48. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (For example: were only those pollutants
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
All current SIUs have 433 categorical parameters. Other permit limits are determined through historical data and industry
need.
49. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits? Explain.
Industries are sampled at a frequency that reflects their production and flow. Erico has continuous flow and is sampled
monthly. Thermal Metal and Pinnacle are batch dischargers and are sampled on a quarterly sampling schedule with
Annual and Bi-Annual samples collected during the year as well (6 months).
Permit Compliance
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes PJ No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Compliance is judged using the ERP for Moore County. If follow up
testing is possible, it is conducted ASAP. NOVs are mailed within 30 days of initial findings. SNC is judged throughout the
year to determine if an industry is in danger of being SNC. Extra testing may be conducted to avoid SNC. If an industry is
SNC, it is published in the local news paper.
52. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
53. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug/spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
54. What criteria are used to determine if a slug/spill control plan is needed?
All SIUs are required to have one.
55. What criteria does the POTW use to determine if a submitted slug/spill control plan is adequate?
Plans should contain POTW contact information, procedures of which to follow in the case of an accidental spill or slug,
notification procedures and have MSDSs on file. Plans are reviewed annually during the SIU inspection. The phone
contact lists are reviewed annually.
56. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
The sample point is located where all effluent from the pretreatment units is mixed prior to discharge into the collections
system. For batch discharges, industries collect from the batch tank prior to discharge into the collections system.
57. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(Example: correct location; proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
POTW: ® Yes ❑ No SIU: ® Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. The current sampling locations are used by the
WPCP as well as the SIUs and their representative commercial labs. SIU representatives handle all samples and mix prior
to collection in the WPCP sample jug. It is then signed over to the WPCP representative. Erico has 24-hour composite
sampling, and Thermal Metals and Pinnacle perform grab sampling on batch discharge.
58. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for Metals Mertiech
Conventional Parameters Meritech and Moore County WPCP
Organics Meritech
59. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
In house, samples are collected by POTW operators. Samples are signed over to the lab by the operator who collected the
sample when samples are delivered. Each COC contains sample location, ID number, date, time collected, collectors initials,
type of sample (C or G), tests to be performed, and temperature (if applicable), collectors signature, time relinquished, date
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Pacer. d

relinquished, receivers signature, time received and date received. Commercial lab samples follow the same custody
procedures. We use Meritech's COC and fill it out with the appropriate information.
Long/Short Term Monitoring Plan (L/STMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA)
60a. Is L/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ►Z/ YES ❑ NO
60b. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all L/STMP Monitoring? ❑ YES ® NO Total Nitrogen and Total
Phosphorus have lower detection limits (0.2mg/L) than stated in the LTMP (0.5mg/L). The Ammonia detection level for
the meter used at the WPCP is 0.5mg/L which is higher than the 0.1mg/L stated in the LTMP. ,
60c. Is L/STMP Data Maintained in Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
60d. All LTMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)? ® YES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, verify yourselfl
60e. If NO to any above, list violations
60f. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to L/STMP? ❑ YES A. NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA)? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, who completes your HWA? Phone ( )
62. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ►1 Yes ❑ No
If yes, what is the reason for the revision? (Mark all that apply) ❑Increased average flow ®NPDES limits change
More LTMP data available ❑Resolve over allocation ►15 year expiration ❑ Other
Explain. HWA is due in November 2010. WPCP will be upgraded and expanded in the next few years and permit limits will
change.
63. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA? ❑Inhibition ❑ Pass -Through ❑Sludge Quality
64. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Explain.
Summary
65. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
The plant will be upgraded in the future (we are in the planning stage now) to 10 MGD.
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Paor. 5

INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 TUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
66. User Name
1. Pinnacle
Erico
Thermal Metals
67. IUP Number
A007
A005
A008
68. Does File Contain Current Permit?
/1 Yes ❑ No
Eff. 07/01/2010
1I1 Yes ❑ No
Eff. 07/01/2008
►I Yes ❑ No
Eff. 07/01/2010
69. Permit Expiration Date
06/30/2015
06/30/2015
06/30/2015
70. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
40 CFR 433
40 CFR 433
40 CFR 433
71. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
Yes ❑ No
12/15/2009
/i1 Yes ❑ No
12/20/2007
Yes ❑ No
12/24/2009
72. Does File Contain Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
Yes ❑ No
12/08/09
►1 Yes ❑ No
12/08/09
Yes ❑ No
12/10/09
73. a. Does File Contain Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. 1fNo, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. _Yes •No
b. ■Yes ■No
a. @@Yes ■No
b. •Yes ■No
a. ►@Yes •No
b. ■Yes ■No
74. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
1s` half 2010
®Yes❑No❑N/A
1st half 2010
®Yes❑No❑N/A
ls' half 2010
75. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. @Yes •No
03/29/2010
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. _Yes ■No
07/03/2008
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. _Yes ■No
03/29/2010
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
76. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP. including Flow?
/i1 Yes ❑ No
►Z1 Yes ❑ No
i1 Yes ❑ No
77. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
►'1 Yes ❑ No
1i1 Yes ❑ No
i1 Yes ❑ No
78. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑YesENo❑N/A
See Comment #2,
below
®Yes❑No❑N/A
79. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports on
time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑YesENo❑N/A
See Comment #2,
below
®Yes❑No❑N/A
80a. For categorical Ilis with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF). does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by 1UP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
80b. For categorical Ills with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
81. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
i1 Yes ❑ No
i1 Yes ❑ No
/i1 Yes ❑ No
none
none
none
82. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
Yes ❑ No
' Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
none
none
83. a. Was POTW Notified by S1U (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW within 30 Days?
c. If applicable. did POTW resample and obtain results within 30 days of
becoming aware of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of SIU?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
84. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes /i1 No
❑ Yes No
85. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken as
Specified in POTW's ERP? .
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEIN/A
❑Yes❑NoEIN/A
86. Does File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑YesENo❑N/A
❑YesENo❑N/A
❑Yes _+No❑N/A
87. Does File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑YesENo❑N/A
❑YesENo❑N/A
❑YesENo❑N/A
88. a. Does File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
89. Did POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any Requested
Information For You?
❑ Yes ►i1 No
❑ Yes ►i1 No
❑ Yes 1'1 No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The files appeared complete, in good order, and very well maintained.
2. (Please see #78 & #79, above) Due to oversight after a recent change in pretreatment personnel at Erico, the single four -day sampling
event for the first half of 2010 was missed. The results were due to the POTW by July 15, 2010. The four "re"samples were taken on
July 6 thru July 9. On July 14, the POTW sent an NOV to Erico. The POTW received the chemistry results on August 9, 2010. Erico
was not in SNC for late reporting because the self -monitoring reports were received within 30 days following the due date.
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Pacer F.

INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
LNJ INICI0101317I51018I I08I101101 It] I ISI I2
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected: Pinnacle Furnishings, Inc
2. Industry Address: 10570 NC Hwy 211 East, Aberdeen, NC 28315
3. Type of Industry/Product: Casino furniture
4. Industry Contact: Orlando Malave Title: Anodizing Line Operator
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview 4 Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes ❑ No
D. Sampling Review Yes ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
High quality casino stools with aluminum bases are anodized, upholstered, and assembled at this facility. Pre -formed extruded
aluminum pipes and other extruded items are purchased from an extrusion facility in Georgia. At the Pinnacle site, the pipes
are cut, the aluminum is brushed, and the metal parts are processed through the chemical vats. Sodium Gluconate, Caustic
Soda, Sulfuric Acid, Phosphoric Acid, Nitric Acid were some of the reagents that were in various vats. The periodic process
discharges were to a 1550 gallon holding tank. The tank was discharged to manhole that flowed into the POTW collection
system.
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
All files that were reviewed were in good order.
Audit SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Audit Comments: The files were very well maintained.
Requirements: none
Recommendations: none
NOD: El Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: El Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactor,® Marginalp,❑
Audit COMPLETED BY: Dale Lopez
Reviewed by: Belinda Henson
Unsatisfactory ❑
DATE: 08/13/2010
DATE:
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
PaoP. 7

United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES • yr/mo/day Inspection
1 1111 2 151 31 NC0037508 111 121 10/08/10 117-
Type Inspector Fac Type
18I CI 191 SI 201
I III66
Remarks
211I II 1111111111111111111111111111111111111'II
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
—
671 2.0 169 701 41 711 I 721 NI 731 1 1 74 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Moore County WPCF
1094 Addor Rd
Aberdeen NC 28315
Entry Time/Date
10:00 AM 10/08/10
Permit Effective Date
05/07/01
Exit Time/Date
04:00 PM 10/08/10
Permit Expiration Date
09/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Jimmy Brant Sikes/ORC/910-948-2431/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Dennis L Brobst,PO Box 1927 Carthage NC 28327/Public Utilities Contacted
Director/910-281-3146/9102812047 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Pretreatment
Section D: Summary of Findinq/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and`Sign`ature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Dale Lopez t� FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.712/ '7 13
•
Signature of Manag ment Q Pr. Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
g. / 62/1 b
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

31
NPDES
NC0037508
111 121
yr/mo/day
10/08/10
Inspection Type
17 18I C
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Inspection Report for the August 10, 2010 inspection
of the pretreatment records and files. Due to oversight after a recent change in pretreatment personnel at
Erico, the single four -day sampling event for the first half of 2010 was missed. The results were due to the
POTW by July 15, 2010. The four "re"samples were taken on July 6 thru July 9. On July 14, the POTW
sent an NOV to Erico. The POTW received the chemistry results on August 9, 2010. Erico was not in
SNC for late reporting because the self -monitoring reports were received within 30 days following the due
date. The report indicates that Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant meets the pretreatment
requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900. We appreciate your co-operation and your continued
efforts with the pretreatment program. My complements to you on an excellent job of up-to-date record
keeping and organization of the Pretreatment files.
Page # 2