NC0037508_Pretreatment Inspection_20110725

AVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 25, 2011
Janna Scherer
Pretreatment Coordinator/Lab Supervisor
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI)
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County
Dear Ms. Scherer:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
for the July 21, 2011 inspection of the pretreatment records and files. The report
indicates that Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant meets the pretreatment
requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900.
We appreciate your co-operation and your continued efforts with the pretreatment
program. Your excellent record keeping and your organization of the Pretreatment files
were outstanding. Please keep up the good work with your pretreatment program. If
you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
incerely,
ta 90
Dale Lopez
Environmental Specia
Enclosures: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
Moore NOV letter that was sent to Thermal Metals
Thermal Metals response letter to the NOV
Thermal Metals In -House Analysis of Tank #1
Thermal Metals In -House Analysis of Tank #2
cc: PERCS - Pretreatment Unit (Monti Hassan)
FRO- files-(Dale-Lopez)-,i)
225 Green St, Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal opportunity i Affirmative Action Employer
One.
NorthCarohna
��XtlCi' ZiIy

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION (Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Moore County WPCP
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Janna Scherer
3. Title(s): Chemist/PT Coordinator/FOG Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: _08/10/2010 Inspection Type (Check One): ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? © YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Y ES Z NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
Main Program Permit Number
N I C 101013171510181
MM/DD/YY
107I211111
Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
3
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
3
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
In September 2010, the Whole Effluent Toxicity resulted in a "Fail". The reason
for the "Fail" was not identified. The following two months (October and
November) resulted in 100% and 57.98%.
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
SNC for
Not Pul
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
YES
NO
❑ YES 0 NO
Limits:
0
Reporting:
0
lished:
0
0
❑ YES a NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Y ES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? E YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? © YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ❑ YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify yourself!
26. if NO to 23 - 26, list violations
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑YES ® NO
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

•
28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW,— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
their tiles. complete Fvith supporting documents and copv of PERCS Approval Letter. and dates consistent \+pith Pro�"ram Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
11/08/10
E/ Yes ❑ No
02/22/11
Yes ❑ No
11/01/15
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
08/22/08
►/ Yes ❑ No
11/05/08
/ZI Yes ❑ No
09/01/13
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
05/31/07
la Yes ❑ No
10/16/07
►ZI Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/30/08
1 Yes ❑ No
11/19/08
IZI Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
06/24/04
1 Yes ❑ No
07/13/04
/1 Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION
29. User Name
1. Erico
2. Pinnacle
3. Thermal Metals
30. IUP Number
A005
A007
A008
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
/'1 Yes, Issued
06/09/08
Yes Issued
03/01/10
N Yes Issued
03/01/10
32. Permit Expiration Date
06/30/13
06/30/15
06/30/15
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
433
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
/1 Yes ❑ No
12/20/07
►I1 Yes ❑ No
12/15/09
11 Yes ❑ No
12/24/09
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
'1 Yes
09/08/10
►1 Yes
08/01/10
►I1 Yes
09/20/10
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. Yes ■No
10/19/10
a. ►i Yes ■No
12/18/09
a. LYes ■No
01/15/09
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
06/30/11
®Yes❑No❑N/A
05/05/2009
®Yes❑No❑N/A
06/28/11
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. CI Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. 0Yes No
b.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
/1 Yes ❑ No
11 Yes ❑ No
►1 Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
Yes ❑ No
/11 Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
41 b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period. Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
ElYes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoEIN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NolZN/A
42b. For categorical lUs with Production based limits. does file include
production rates and/or tlows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
/1 Yes ❑ No
11 Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
No violations
No violations
Zn in Mar 2011
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑No 0N/A
❑Yes❑NoHN/A
No violatons
❑Yes❑No®N/A
No violations
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. If applicable, Did POTW resarnple within 30 clays of becoming aware
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU? `
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ►1 No
❑ Yes /11 No
❑ Yes ►Z1 No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs. Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑NoEIN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
See File Review
Comment #5
(below)
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NotEN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form
Upda ed 7125/07 Page 2

50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
a. ❑ Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
a. ❑ Yes ❑No o N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a. ❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑Noe N/A
❑ Yes i4 No
❑ Yes /5 No
❑ Yes ►4 No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Meritech performed all of the LTMP detection levels at the low levels that were required by the LTMP.
2. On July 1, 2011, the POTW and two of it's CIUs (Pinnacle IUP# A007 and Thermal Metals IUP# A008) switched
from Meritech to Research Analytical Labs (in Kernersville, NC). Erico (IUP# A005) continued to use MicroBac.
3. George Yankay is the new POTW Superintendent (and ORC), and Rex Downs is the lead WWTP operator.
4. Wharton -Smith has been awarded the contract on the POTW's upgrades.
5. (See #47, above) The only CIU limit occurred on March 10, 2011 for Zinc. Please see the attached POTW NOV that was
sent to Thermal Metal Treating, Inc. and the response letter from the CIU. The list of the dates and the events are as
indicated by the following chart.
Month & Test
Parameter
Date that the
SIU Self-
Monitoring
results were
due (IUP
says due by
15ih)
Date that the
SIU Self-
Monitoring or
POTW results
were REC'D
by the POTW
(IUP says
due by 15t)
Date that SIU
notified
POTW of
limits
violations
Date that SIU
resample was
due at the
POTW
Date that SIU
resample
results were
actually
received by
the POTW
Date that
POTWsentan
NOV to SIU
Date that the
response from
the SIU was
due
Date that the
response was
actually
REC'D
Response
Adequate?
Mar 2011
04/07/11
04/07/11
04/07/11
The SIU
05/05/11
04/13/11
05/13/11
05/03/11,
Zinc
Routinely
samples
every
month
Yes
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

NO INDUSTRY INSPECTION PERFORMED DURING THIS PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONI
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans. Code
Main Program Permit Number
LI`Ll 1 1 I L I 1 I I I
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
I 1 1 I[ J S► J 21
(DTIA) (TYPI) (1NSP) (FACC)
3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact:
Phone:
Fax:
Title:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview ❑ Y ES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments:
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: We appreciate your co-operation and Your continued efforts with the pretreatment program. Your excellent record keeping and
your organization of the Pretreatment files were outstanding. Please keep up the good work with your pretreatment program.
Requirements: None
Recommendations: Please keep up the good work.
NOD: ❑ YES 4 NO
NOV: ❑ YES ►I NO
QNCR: ❑ YES NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory Ma
PCI COMPLETED BY: Dale Lopez
nal
Un
isfactory
DATE: July 25, 2011
REVIEWED BY: Belinda Henson 7g€14;y4 ) • `J DATE: 1 — 2 1O - 11
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 4

United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA. Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form' Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
1 I NI 2 15I 31 N00037508 111 121 11/07/21. 117
Type Inspector Fac Type
18I PI 19I sI 20I I
Remarks
211111111111111111111I1111111111111111I11111111116�
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA
67I 2.0 169 70I 51 711 I 721 N I
Reserved-----------
I 1 I 1 1 I 1 80
731 1 174 761
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Moore County WPCF
1094 Addor Rd
Aberdeen NC 28315
Entry Time/Date
10:30 AM 11/07/21
Permit Effective Date
10/12/01
Exit Time/Date
02:00 PM 11/07/21
Permit Expiration Date
14/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Rex A Downs/ORC/910-436-2836/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Dennis L Brobst,PO Box 1927 Carthage NC 283271927/Public OtilitiesContacted
Director/910-281-3146/9102812047 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Pretreatment
Section D: Summary of Findinq/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Date
7 AS://Aeil
Dale Lopez N FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.712/
Ualt dr `4.,)
Signature of Mana ement Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
• 1/D, (/11
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NC0037508 I11 12I 11/07/21 117 18IP1
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Meritech performed all of the LTMP detection levels at the low levels that were required by the LTMP.
2. On July 1, 2011, the POTW and two of it's CIUs (Pinnacle IUP# A007 and Thermal Metals IUP# A008)
switched from Meritech to Research Analytical Labs (in Kernersville, NC). Erico (IUP# A005) continued to
use MicroBac.
3. George Yankay is the new POTW Superintendent (and ORC), and Rex Downs is the lead WWTP
operator.
4. Wharton -Smith has been awarded the contract on the POTW's upgrades.
5. The only CIU limit violation that occurred was on. March 10, 2011, for Zinc. Please see the attached
POTW NOV that was sent to Thermal Metal Treating, Inc. Please also see the response letter from the
CIU.
The report indicates that Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant meets the pretreatment requirements
as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900.
We appreciate your co-operation and your continued efforts with the pretreatment program. Your excellent
record keeping and your organization of the Pretreatment files were outstanding. Please keep up the good
work with your pretreatment program.
Page # 2

Public WorIs
"Water ToCCution Control Plant
Io94 W t71r Road
liercfeen, _NC 28315
County of .mil o ore
April 13, 2011
Jerry Ritter
Thermal Metal Treating, Inc
9546 Hwy 211E
PO Box 367
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Permit No. A008
Dear Mr. Ritter:
Q1o) 281-3146- Tfione
'ta -(9lo) 281-2047- Fax
COPY
A review of Thermal Metal's monitoring data for March 2011 showed the following
violation(s):
Parameter
Date
Limit
Value
Reported
Value
From
Industry
Reported
Value
From
PO W-
Limit Type
Zinc
3/10/11
2.61
mg/1
21.7 rnor
Daily
Maximum
Exceeded
Zinc
3/10/11
1.48
mg/1
21.7 mg/1
Monthly
Average
Exceeded
Remedial actions must be taken to correct the problem. The Moore County Water
Pollution Control Plant may pursue enforcement action for this and any additional
violations in accordance with the Enforcement Response Plan.
Per Section 8.1 of the Moore County Sewer Use Ordinance, Thermal Metal Treating shall
respond in writing within thirty (30) days as to the cause of these violations and what
corrective actions will be taken to prevent future violations.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 910-281-3146.
Sincerely,
anna Scherer, County of Moore, Pretreatment Coordinator
Cc: Mr. George Yankay, County of Moore, Superintendent . :I
Mr. Dennis Brobst, County of Moore, Public Works Director

A9443
Your gateway to innovative metal processing technology
ISO 9002
9546 HWY 211 EAST - ABERDEEN, NC 28315
PC) 89X 367 - ABERDEEN, NC 213315
P: 910 - 944 -3636
F: 910 -944 -3280
www.thprrnplmgtal.com
May 3, 2011
Janna Scherer
County of Moore
Pretreatment Coordinator
Dear Janna,
n c1r_,ncaC-3n
rr*r! ._
'till
{
In response to the Notice of Violation - Permit No. A008, you sent Thermal Metal Treating,
Inc. — TMT. I am sending you this letter of explanation of the violation and remedial action
taken to prevent any further occurrence.
In April our outside laboratory for treated waste water quality testing, Meritech, Inc. of
Reidsville, NC was sent our normal monthly test sample. Their test indicated a zinc reading
21.7 mg/I which far exceeded the maximum reporting limit and any zinc reading we had
ever recorded internally.
TMT's normal sampling procedure for all treated waste water is as follows:
Using a calibrated Hach 2010 spectrophotometer, tests are made and recorded for copper,
nickel, and zinc metals before the waste water treatment and following treatments to verify
compliance before any discharge to the municipal system is performed.
TMT's internal records indicate no reading have ever reached the levels reported by
Meritech on the subject batch lot, ,before or .after treatment. - See typical TMT recorded
readings on the attached internal records for March 2011.
In reviewing the steps leading up to the treatment of the batch of waste water that the
Meritech sample was taken from, nothing out of the ordinary was found in the type of
product processed during the production cycle that generated this waste water. No
changes in the chemicals or methods of treatment were used that may have led to an
inordinately high zinc level. There is no assignable cause that could be established for the
extremely high zinc readings based on the history or treatment of this batch lot.
Remedial action by TMT includes:
e All samples from now on, taken from our treated waste stream, will have a duplicate
sample taken in approved containers. One will be submitted to Meritech or another
certified laboratory and the other stored in a dedicated refrigerator at TMT, until
records of compliance are received by TMT. This will allow for an additional test
sample to be .checked if the original sample results find any questionable readings.

l`i ERM L AL - FIEF-`Gi'. EGG, GNr. .
9546 HWY 211 EAST - ABERDEEN, NC 28315
A9443
Your gateway to innovative metal processing technology
ISO 9002
Po BOX 367 - A_BERDEE.N, NC 28315
P; 910 - 944 -3636
F: 910 - 944 -3280
www.thermalmetaLcon
• Although nothing indicated the TMT spectrophotometer registered a false reading for
the subject zinc sample, they will move from a quarterly calibration test to a monthly
one.
• Meritech Lab. picked up the subject sample on March 3, 2011 and we didn't receive
the results_ until March 28, 2011. We are requesting Meritech report readings in a
timelier manner to allow for the duplicate sample to be tested before the calendar
month expires.
Thermal metal treating, cannot pin point or prove a fault attributable to this occurrence
either internally or with Meritech's results and therefore must leave this with only being
able to reinforce our current system with some redundancy and higher level of
calibrations to .catch a future instance of insufficient flocking or bad test procedures from
our testing vendor.
Best regards,
Jerry Ritter
President / Metallurgist

THERMA1` ETAL TREATING INC.
9546 HWY k EAST
ABERDEEN, NC. 28315
PH: 910.944.3636 FAX: [phone]
WASTEWATER TREA :NT DAILY LOG
IN-HOUSE ANALYSIS
TANK#1
DATE
LOADED
AMOUNT
PRIOR TREATMENT LAB ANALYSIS
LOADED
PH
COPPER
NICKEL
ZINK
3/2/2011
540
12.30
0.89
0.45
0.55
3/7/2011
540
11.90
1.037
0.96
0.82
3/10/2011
3/15/2011
540
9.90
0.89
0.88
0.45
3/16/2011
3/28/2011
540
5.30
0.67
0.77
0.34
3/29/2011
Monthly Tot.
2160
Yearly Tot.
2180
Monthly Av.
, 720
Weekly Aver.
180
PREPARED BY:
TITLE: ORC
M.N.
DISCHARGED
AFTER TREATMENT LAB ANALYSIS
% REMOVAL
DATE
AMOUNT
PH
COPPER
NICKEL
ZINK
-COPPER
NICKEL
ZINK
3/3/2011
540
6.7
0.42
0.099
0.066
47%
35%
48%
3/10/2011
540
6.8
0.507
0.067
0.77
53%
89%
5%
3/16/2011
540
6.77
0.17
0.21
0.0073
72%
67% -
44%
3/29/2011
540
7.1
0.11
0.08.1
0.002
56%
69%
34%
Monthly Tot.
2160
Yearly Tot.
2160
Monthly Av.
720
Weekly Aver.
180
MARCH l v l 1
PH METER CALIBRATION
DATE
INITIALS
3/3/2011
M.N.
3/10/2011
M.N.
3/16/2011
M.N.
3/29/2011
M.N.

P.1
THERMAL METAL TREATING INC.
9546 HWY 211 EAST
ABERDEEN, NC. 28315
PH: 910.944.3636 FAX: [phone]
WASTEWATER TREATMENT DAILY LOG
IN-HOUSE ANALYSIS
TANK#Z
M.N.
DATE
LOADED
AMOUNT
LOADED
PRIOR TREATMENT LAB ANALYSIS
DISCHARGED
AFTER TREATMENT LAB ANALYSIS
% REMOVAL
PH METER CALIBRATION
PH
COPPER
NICKEL
ZINK
DATE
AMOUNT
PH
COPPER
NICKEL
ZINK
COPPER
NICKEL
ZINK
DATE
INITIALS
3/1/2011
540
12.00
0.99
0.87
0.45
3/2/2011
3/2/2011
540
6.5
0.07
0.03
0.008
9.1
7.3
2.0
3/2/2011
M.N.
3/3/2011
3/4/2011
3/5/2011
3/6/2011
3/7/2011
3/8/2011
3/9/2011
3/10/2011
3/11/2011
540
9.50
0.67
0.55
0.23
3/12/2011
3/13/2011
3/14/2011
3/14/2011
540
0.28
0.1
0.009
0.003
3.8
3.0
0.5
3/14/2011
M.N.
3/15/2011
3/16/2011
3/17/2011
•
3/18/2011
.
3/19/2011
3/20/2011
540
11.20
0.77
0.55
0.42
3/21/2011
3/21/2011
540
6.8
0.023
0.044
0.0022
5.8
2.8
1.8
3/21/2011
M.N.
3/22/2011
540
11.40
0.95
0.73
0.79
3/23/2011
3/23/2011
540
6.5
0.077
0.069
0.0034
8.3
4.8
6.2
3/23/2011
M.N.
3/24/2011
540
11.60
0.85
0.59
0.12
3/25/2011
.
3/26/2011
•
3/27/2011
3/28/2011
3/28/2011
540
6.7
0.013
0.0045
0.004
7.1
3.5
0.1
3/28/2011
M.N.
3/29/2011
.
3/30/2011
3/31/2011
Monthly Tot.
2700
-
Monthly Tot.
2700
Yearly Tot.
2700
Yearly Tot.
2700
Monthly Av.
900
Monthly Av.
900
Weekly Aver.
225
Weekly Aver.
225
TITLE: ORC