NC0037508_Pretreatment Compliance_20131022

ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
October 22, 2013
Janna Scherer
• Pretreatment Coordinator/Lab Supervisor
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI)
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County
Dear Ms. Scherer,
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the
October 18, 2013 inspection of the pretreatment records. This report indicates .that Moore
County Water Pollution Control Plant meets the pretreatment requirements as outlined in 15A
NCAC 2H .0900.
I appreciate your co-operation and your continued efforts with the pretreatment program.
Your excellent record keeping and organization of the pretreatment files continues to be
outstanding, as well as your implementation of the pretreatment program. Please keep up the
good work. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact_
me at [phone].
Dale Lopez
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures: EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
cc: PERCS - Pretreatment Unit (Monti Hassan)
FRO les::(DaleLopez) )
225 Green Street— Suite 714 — Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5095
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]\ Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet:: www.ncwaterquality.orq
An Equal OpportunitylAffinnative Action Employer

• United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8 31 98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
1 I N I 2 I s l 31 NC0037508 111 121 13/10/18 117
Type Inspector Fac Type
18l P I 19 I S I 20I
111111166
Remarks
211111111111111111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 111111111111
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
671 2.0 169 70 15 I 711 l 72I N I 73I 1 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Moore County WPCF
1094 Addor Rd
Aberdeen NC 28315
Entry Time/Date
10:30 AM 13/10/18
Permit Effective Date
10/12/01
Exit Time/Date
02:00 PM 13/10/18
Permit Expiration Date
14/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
George R Yankay/ORC/910-789-2658/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
George Yankay,1094 Adder Rd Aberdeen NC 28315//910-281-3146/ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
and checklists as necessary)
Other
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) • • . •. ture(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Dale Lopez FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.712/ ,'� <,,
/� p y s N)
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
AD I 46.0,34,-yo 1 0/ 3h 3
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

31
NPDES
NC0037508
111 121
yr/mo/day Inspection Type
13/10/18 1 17 181 P
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
This Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report is for the October 18, 2013 inspection of the pretreatment
records, and the report indicates that Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant met the pretreatment
requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900.
I appreciate the cooperation of the Pretreatment Coordinator (Ms. Janna Scherer) and her continued efforts
with the pretreatment program. The excellent record keeping and organization of the pretreatment files
continues to be outstanding, as well as the implementation of the pretreatment program. Please keep up
the good work. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Page # 2

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Moore County WPCP
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Janna Scherer
3. Title(s): Chemist/PT Coordinator/FOG Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 11/16/2012 Inspection Type (Check One): L PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? 0 YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
N
Main Program Permit Number
1 NI C 101013171510181
MM/DD/YY
110►1.81131
Inspec.Type
P
Inspector Fac. Type
1 SI 1 1 1
INSP (FACC
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
3
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
3
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired [UP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
1-
pSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
FC & Ammonia due to the installation of upgrades at the POTW
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
(Therr
SNC for
Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
1YES NO
❑ YES IN NO
Limits: 1
al Metals for Zinc during the Last half of 2012)
Reporting: 0
lished: 0 -
0
❑ YES V4 NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? Z YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
❑NO
DWQ Inspector, please verify yourself!
26. If NO to 23 - 26, List violations
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
NC DWO Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of'Program
Element in their files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
See File Review Comment #1
11/08/10
0 Yes ❑ No
02/22/11
/1 Yes ❑ No
11/01/2015
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
08/29/13
' Yes ❑ No
Pending
approval
(11/05/08)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Pending
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
04/04/13
/1 Yes ❑ No
04/22/13
/1 Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/30/08
/1 Yes ❑ No
11/19/08
/1 Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
07/26/13
// Yes ❑ No
09/09/13
/1 Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION
29. User Name
1. Erico
2. Pinnacle
3. Thermal Metals
30. IUP Number
A005
A007
A008
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
Yes, eff.
07/01/13
/1 Yes Mod
eff.09/01/13
,I Yes eff.
07/01/10
32. Permit Expiration Date
06/30/18
06/30/15
06/30/15
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
433
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
Yes ❑ No
12/31/12
►1 Yes ❑ No
12/15/09
►1 Yes ❑ No
12/24/09
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
0
Yes 9/24/13
/1 Yes 9/10/13
/1 Yes 9/23/13
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ►A Yes ■No
10/19/2010
a. o Yes ■No
12/18/2009
a. ►1Yes ■No
01/15/2009
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. Yes ■No
02/14/13
b.®Yes ❑No❑N/A
a. ►SYes ■No
03/29/10
09/03/13
b. ® Yes ❑No❑N/A
a. rYes ■No
03/29/10
b.®Yes olio ❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
►1 Yes ❑ No
►/ Yes ❑ No
/1 Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
i1 Yes
❑
No
/1
Yes
❑
No
0 Yes ❑
No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
El Yes ❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
41 b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N.!A
12a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑YesDNoON/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
I2b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑ Yes ❑NoEIN/A
1.3a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
►1 Yes ❑ No
No violations
since 2010
►1 Yes ❑ No
No NOVs since
July 2012
/1 Yes ❑ No
13b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑NoE1N/A
None
❑Yes❑NoeN/A
None
EYes❑No❑N/A
l4. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU?
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
The SIU knows
their requirements
for resampling
c.❑Yes ❑No0N/A
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No EN/A
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
.6. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes
V No
❑
Yes
►1
No
❑
Yes
►1
No
II
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form
Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑ Yes ❑No®N/A
El Yes ❑No❑N/A
NOV for March
2013 Zinc
❑ Yes ❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No ON/A
❑Yes❑N°NN/A
a.❑Yes ❑NooN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. cries ❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
❑ Yes ►1 No
❑ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes /1 No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. (See Pretreatment Program Elements Review) Although the Headworks Analysis was not due yet, the Moore County
Pretreatment Coordinator was performing one --- in order to reflect more accurate numbers due to changes from the
recent upgrades that were installed at the POTW.
TT(' fWn PrPtrPatrnpnt Cnrnrtlianr, Tnenrrtinn (PPTM Fnrm Tim -later' 7/75/(17 PaaP

INO INDUSTRY INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED DURING THIS PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONI
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code
I N
Main Program Permit Number
MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(DTIA)
l I I l s l 1 2
(TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact:
Phone:
Title:
Fax:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments:
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: We appreciate your co-operation and your continued efforts with the pretreatment program. Your excellent record keeping
and your organization of the Pretreatment files were outstanding. Please keep up the good work with your pretreatment program.
Requirements: None
Recommendations: Please keep up the good work.
NOD: ❑ YES ENO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES El NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ✓ Marginal
PCI COMPLETED BY: Dale Lopez
REVIEWED BY: Belinda Henson
UnSatisfactory
DATE: October 22, 2013
DATE:
N(' TlWC Pretreatment ('mmrilianre Tnenertinn (PPTl Fnrrn TTnriatr.rl 7/7S/r17 PahP d