NC0037508_NPDES Permit Renewal App_20090212

County of Moore
Public Works
Wastewater Treatment Plant
i o94 Addor Road
.Aberdeen North Carotin 28315
U,OF 4Q
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] : • www.moorecountync.gov
DEN F
FE8 1 7 2029
DWQ
February 12, 2009
Mr. Dale Lopez, Environmental Specialist
NC DENR, DWQ
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
RE: NPDES Permit NC0037508
Dear Mr. Lopez,
Pursuant to our conversation on 2/5/09, the following item is submitted and enclosed with
this correspondence:
• Plant Process Narrative
o The narrative contains a brief overview of the Moore County Water
Pollution Control Plant and descriptions of each individual process unit.
The narrative serves as an amendment to the permit renewal application,
submitted on January 30, 2009.
Please amend your copy of the permit renewal application to include the narrative. If you
have any questions or require moreinformation, feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
J. Brant Sikes, Superintendent
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant

Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant Process Narrative
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant is an activated sludge treatment facility with two
stages of aeration and three stages of sedimentation. Anaerobic digestion is utilized to reduce the
volume of sludge which is subsequently spread to the drying beds.
Raw sewage enters the wet well of the Raw Sewage Pump Station by gravity and is screened and
pumped to the Grit Removal Unit where grit is separated from the raw flow. The sewage then
flows to the primary clarifiers (two) from which the primary sludge flows to the digesters. Flow
is then into the First Stage Aeration Basin where diffused aeration is employed is employed to
reduce the BOD of the wastewater. The Intermediate Clarifiers (two) receive the flow, and the
settled sludge is returned to the aeration basin with excess going to the digester. The wastewater
then enters the Second Stage Aeration Basin where diffused aeration further reduces the BOD
and also accomplishes nitrification. The Final Clarifiers (two) then provide final sedimentation
of the activated sludge which is returned to the aeration basin with excess to the digesters. The
liquid flowing over the wier of the Final Clarifier is then allowed to flow into the Chlorine
Contact Basin where chlorination is accomplished. The flow is de -chlorinated, at the end of the
Chlorine Contact Basin, using Sulfur Dioxide. The final step in treatment is the Cascade Aerator
to allow the remaining elevation to be employed to increase the oxygen content of the treated
effluent.
The primary sludge and the waste activated sludge from the Intermediate Clarifiers and the Final
Clarifiers is pumped to the Anaerobic Digesters. Digested sludge is withdrawn from the digesters
and spread on the Sludge Drying Beds to allow for final disposition at either a landfill or
composting facility.
The following section provides a brief description of each process unit.
Raw Sewage Pump Station
The Raw Sewage Pumping Station wet well receives the raw flow and the in -plant waste flow
through a mechanically cleaned bar screen. The purpose of these units is to remove rags, sticks,
and other debris that may interfere with the equipment and treatment units that follow. Bar
screening is also done at the pump stations ahead of the pumps. The screenings are landfilled.
The wet well has a small volume to prevent septicity of the sewage during low flow. Four dry pit
submersible pumps takesuction from the wet well and maintain the wet well level in a narrow
range as the inflow varies.
Grit Removal Unit
The effluent from the Raw Sewage Pump Station enters the parshall flume at the Grit Unit where
the total waste flow measurement is made. The discharge from the parshall flume is routed
through control gates to two grit chambers where sand and other heavy particulate matter settle
from the wastewater.

The settled grit is pumped from the bottom of each chamber by two grit pumps discharging into
the grit washer where the grit slurry is dewatered. A screw conveyor carries the grit to a
container located outside the Grit Unit. The grit thus collected is landfilled.
Wastewater in the Grit Unit flows over a wier into the effluent line ensuring a grit free discharge
to the Primary Clarifiers.
Primary Clarifiers
Two 75.0 ft. diameter settling tanks receive the wastewater from the Grit Unit. Settled solids
(sludge) from the clarifiers are mechanically collected for pumping to the anaerobic digesters.
Sewage enters the clarifier at the center and flows through ports in the top of the central vertical
pipe, then radially to a peripheral effluent wier. A very slowly rotating collector arm plows
settled solids to the sludge draw off pit at the center of the tank. A skimmer attached to the arm
collects scum from the surface and drops it into a scum box that drains outside the tank wall.
Both primary sludge and scum are allowed to flow into a pit located beside the clarifier. This
primary sludge in the pit is then pumped directly to the anaerobic digesters by pumps located in
the Grit Unit.
First Stage Aeration Basin
The First Stage Aeration Basin is separated into four rectangular compartments with diffused air.
The effluent from the Primary Clarifiers flows into each compartment at three points for a step
feed process. Return activated sludge from the Intermediate Clarifiers is pumped into each
compartment at three locations further enhancing nutrient equalization.
Wastewater flowing onto the First Stage Aeration Basin contains organic matter (BOD) as a food
supply. Bacteria metabolize the waste solids, producing new growth while taking in dissolved
oxygen and releasing carbon dioxide. Protozoa graze on bacteria for energy to reproduce. Some
of the new microbial growth dies releasing cell contents to solution for re -synthesis. After the
addition of a large population of microorganisms, aerating raw wastewater for a few hours
removes organic matter from solution by synthesis into microbial cells. Mixed liquor is - ----
continuously transferred to the Intermediate Clarifier for gravity separation of the biological floc.
Settled floc (activated sludge) is returned continuously from the sludge hoppers at the
Intermediate Clarifiers to the First Stage Aeration Basin for mixing with entering wastewater.
Intermediate Clarifiers
Two 90 ft. diameter settling tanks receive the flow of mixed liquor from the First Stage Aeration
Basin. The purpose of the Intermediate Clarifiers is gravity separation of the biological growth
suspended in the mixed liquor effluent from the aeration basin.
The liquid flow pattern is the same as that of the Primary Clarifiers except that the sludge is
collected with suction tubes that pick up sludge several radii in the tank. The sludge collection

system provides rapid withdrawal of sludge across the entire bottom of the tank. The retention
time of solids that settle near the tank periphery is not greater than those that land near the center,
thus, aging of the biological floc and subsequent floating solids due to gas production is
eliminated.
Settling sludge flows by gravity into the wet well in the Return Activated Pump Station #1 where
it is then pumped into the First Stage Aeration Basin. Excess sludge is wasted to the Solid
Handling Unit.
Second Stage Aeration Basin
The Second Stage Aeration Basin provides carbonaceous BOD removal and nitrification. The
basin is subdivided into four compartments with baffles for plug flow. Each compartment is
aerated with diffused air. The influent is split in control structure #4 and flows to the head of
each of the four compartments. Activated sludge from the Final Clarifier is returned to the head
of each compartment.
The process of nitrification involves oxidation of ammonia to nitrate. The important parameters
in bacterial nitrification kinetics are temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen concentration.
Reaction rate is decreased markedly at reduced temperatures with about 80°F being the
minimum reasonable value. Optimum pH in near 8.4 s.u. and the dissolved oxygen level should
be greater than 1.0 mg/1. The system requires a long sludge retention time to prevent excessive
loss of viable nitrifying bacteria.
Since biological nitrification destroys alkalinity, lime slurry is added to the Second Stage
Aeration Basin to raise the pH to the optimum level.
In order to enhance solid separation in the Final Clarifiers polymer is added to the Second Stage
Aeration Basin.
Final Clarifiers
Two 105 ft. diameter settling tanks receive the flow of mixed liquor from the Second Stage
Aeration Basin. The purpose of the Final Clarifier is gravity separation of the biological growths
suspended in the mixed liquor effluent from the aeration basin. Sludge is collected and returned
to the aeration basin to maintain a supply of nitrifying organisms.
The Final Clarifiers are, except for a greater volume, identical to the intermediate clarifier.
Chlorine Contact Basin and De -chlorination Process
Flow from the Final Clarifiers enters the Chlorine Basin where chlorine is added and mixed with
a rapid mixer. The detention time at average flow is 30 minutes.
Chlorine is used for disinfection to destroy pathogens and control nuisance microorganisms.
Following chlorination, the flow is de -chlorinated using sulfur dioxide

Cascade Aerator
The treated wastewater leaves the chlorine contact basin and then flows over the Cascade
Aerator. Water turbulence caused by the slats and steps increase the dissolved oxygen content of
the water entering the receiving streams.
Primary Anaerobic Digester
The Primary Anaerobic Digester functions to reduce the volume of sludge by providing an
oxygen free environment for sludge digestion and gas formation. The purpose of sludge
digestion is to convert bulky, odorous, raw sludge to a relatively inert material that can be rapidly
dewatered in the absence of obnoxious odors.
The bacterial process consists of two successive processes that occur simultaneously in digesting
sludge. The first stage consists of breaking down large organic compounds and converting them
to organic acids along with gaseous by-products of carbon dioxide, methane and trace amounts
of hydrogen sulfide. In order for digestion to occur, second stage gasification is needed to
convert the organic acids to methane and carbon dioxide. This stage is very sensitive to
environmental conditions of temperature and pH.
The primary Anaerobic Digester is completely mixed by a gas compressor that forces the sludge
gas collected under the floating cover down to the bottom of the digestion tank. The rising gas
bubbles provide complete mixing of the digested contents.
Two sludge heaters are provided to maintain the temperature at an optimum 95°F for best
digestion.
The gas collected in the digester is used to fuel the sludge heaters and heat the Solid Handling
Unit. Excess gas is allowed to burn in the waste gas burner.
Secondary Anaerobic Digester
Since the contents of the Primary Anaerobic Digester are completely mixed, no sludge
thickening is possible in this unit. The purpose of the Secondary Digester is to provide an
environment where anaerobic digestion can continue under minimum hydraulic disturbances
which result in a dense sludge at the bottom of the digester and a clear supernate above the
sludge.
The sludge and supernate are periodically withdrawn and allowed to flow to the sludge drying
beds for air drying.

AVM
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 5, 2009
NICK PICERNO
CHAIRMAN
MOORS COUNTY WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT
1094 ADDOR ROAD
ABERDEEN NC 28315
Subject: Receipt of permit renewal application
NPDES Permit NC0037508
Moore County WPCF
Moore County
Dear Mr. Picerno:
The NPDES Unit received your permit renewal application on February 2, 2009. A member of the NPDES
Unit will review your application. They will contact you if additional information is required to complete your
permit renewal. You should expect to receive a draft permit approximately 30-45 days before your existing permit
expires.
If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please, contact James McKay
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dina Sprinkle
Point Source Branch
cc: CENTRAL FILES
Kaye evilte',Regi raalrO'ffice/Surface Water Protection
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:.1-877-623-6748
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Department of Public Works
Wastewater Treatment Plant
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Waepitty pAtaaiee
January 29, 2009
Re: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR/DWQ/ Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mrs. Sprinkle:
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (910) 281-204'1
7
FEB - 2 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Moore County's NPDES Permit expires July 31, 2009. In compliance with Federal (40
CFR 122) and State (15A NCAC 2H.0105 (e)) regulations, we are required to submit a
Permit Renewal Application at least 180 days prior to the expiration date. The Permit
Renewal Application is enclosed, in triplicate; with correspondence.
The County of Moore requests that their existing Permit be renewed as is, without any
modifications.
The following are changes made at the facility since the last issuance of the permit:
1. A liquid lime system was installed and use of the bulk hydrated lime was
discontinued.
2. The raw sewage pump station was upgraded from a capacity of 6.7mgd to
10mgd in preparation for the plant upgrade.
If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to contact me at (910) 281-
3146.
Sincerely,
J. Brant Sikes, System Superintendent
JBS/jls
Enclosures
Cc: Ms. Belinda Henson, Fayetteville Regional Office, Director
Mr. Cary McSwain, County of Moore, Manager
Mr. Dennis Brobst, County of Moore, Public Utilities Director

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
FORM
2A
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow z 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following c 'teria „fit c.re et- „ (To : Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing. F E B - 2 2009
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (Sills) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as: ®EN R .WATER Q UALITy
Standards under 40 Coe f e a R ulations CFR 403.6 an
PretreatmentAll to
1. 40CFRCalusersuSubchapter N(seeinlrVIINlSOURCE BRANCH
40 CFR Chapter I, N (see instructions); and T
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C;'1

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control, NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
Mailing Address 1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Contact Person J. Brant Sikes
Title System Superintendent
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address same as above
(not P.O. Box)
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Moore County Board of Commissioners
Mailing Address PO Box 905
Carthage, NC 28327
Contact Person Nick Picerno
Title Chairman
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner ❑ operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
0 facility 0 applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC 0037508 PSD
UIC Other Air: 07651R03
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities•and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Town of Aberdeen 4,665 separate town
Town of Southern Pines 11,586 separate town
Village of Pinehurst approx. 11,000 separate municipal
Town of Carthage 2,114 separate town
Town of Pinebluff 1,317 separate town
Tourism/seasonal/resort 6,000 separate town
Total population served 36.682
/

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
0 Yes ❑ No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12 month of "this year occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 6.7 mgd
b. Annual average daily flow rate
c. Maximum daily flow rate
Two Years Aqo
5.002 mqd
6.521 mqd
Last Year
4.837 mqd
5.575 mod
This Year
4.516 mqd
5.877 mqd
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer ap
prox. 205.3 miles
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
1
o%
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent 0
iii. Combined sewer overflow points 0
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks) 0
v. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s) mgd
Is discharge
❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater? ❑ Yes © No
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site: mgd
Is land application 0 continuous or ❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works? ❑ Yes El No

FAt:ILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber.
e.
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name •
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the
following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection):
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
that receives this discharge
the receiving facility. mgd
in a manner not included
❑ Yes ® No
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method 0 continuous or ❑ intermittent?

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.B.a, go to Part B. "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location Aberdeen 28315
(City or town, it applicable) (Zip Code)
Moore County North Carolina
(County) (State)
35°04'04" N 78°28'07" W
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Average daily flow rate mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? 0 Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes ® No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Aberdeen Creek
b. Name of watershed (if known)
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3

F4a CILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary.
❑ Advanced 0 Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 90
Design SS removal 90 %
Design P removal 0 %
Design N removal 75 %
Other
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Chlorination
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? 0 Yes ® No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information
reported mustbe based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number. 001
PARAMETER
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
Value
Units
Value
Units
, Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.15
s.u.
pH (Maximum)
7.55
s.u.
Flow Rate
5.789
mgd
4.486
mgd
365
Temperature (Winter)
19.7
°C
16.2
°C
361
Temperature (Summer)
26.2
°C
22.5
°C
361
* For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
• AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
METHOD
MUMDL
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
11.6
mg/L
7.2
mg/L
249
SM5210B
DEMAND (Report one)
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
3
338
#/100mL
116
#/100mL
248
SM922D(MF)
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
16
mg/L
9
mg/L
249
SM2540D
END OF'PART A
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW. (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE- WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN -FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate >_ 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through 8.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day
613,910 gpd
that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
improve the system and reduce inflow and infiltration.
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
Rehab of Old Town Pinehurst sewer lines and 4 stations will
Rehab is planned for the Interceptor also,
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area sun-ounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within''/ mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? 0 Yes Z No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number. ( )
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
001
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes 0 No

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
c. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
Plant upgrade will increase treatment capacity to 10 mqd. We are still in the planning and design phase.
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction 08/01/2010 / /
- End Construction 07/31/2012 / /
- Begin Discharge / / / /
- Attain Operational Level / / / /
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances conceming other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ® No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluenttesting data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number: 001
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
<0.50
mglL
<0.50
mg/L
249
SM4500NH3F
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
17
ug/L
10
ug/L
248
SM4500CI-G
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
11.44
mg/L
9.50
mg/L
362
SM45000-G
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
1.79
mg/L
0.79
mg/L
12
EPA 351.1
NITRATE
NIT OGENLUS NITRITE
26.1
mg/L
21.1
mg/L
12
EPA 353.2
OIL and GREASE
•
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
3.97
mg/L
3.37
mg/L
12
EPA 200.7
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
OTHER
END OFPARTB
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE, WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE -

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
BASIC APPLICATION. INFORMATION
PART C. "CERTIFICATION.: -"`
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained In the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Fomi 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
® Part F (Industn::u3er s rOM
El Part G ( omb' . %ver SSyysst ri§
C CERCI '-17V. tes)
py.��
ALL APPLICANTS"MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for subm
for knowing violations. g
Name and official title Nick Picer o- Chairman POINT
my dirleeiibn or si?peraigP
submitted. Based on
information is, to the
(sg forma 'c, iget ti
yyK e FkI
cQ U RCE
in accordance with a system
my inquiry of the person or persons who
best of my knowledge and belief, true,
pgssit�ilyty f fine and imprisonment
BRANCH
Signature �iG+
•
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed / "" d I ` 09
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

FAf:ILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control, NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required to
have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
is
effluent discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other
appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below any
data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant scans and
must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number. 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
<0.010
rng/L
<0.010
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
<0.002
mg/L
<0.002
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
CHROMIUM
<0.005
mg/L
<0.005
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
COPPER
0.025
rng/L
0.018
mg/L
22
EPA 200.7
LEAD
<0.010
mg/L
<0.010
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
MERCURY
10.80
ng/L
7.40
ng/L
48
EPA 1631
NICKEL
<0.010
mg/L
<0.010
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
SELENIUM
<0.010
rng/L
<0.010
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
SILVER
<0.005
mg/L
<0.005
mg/L
22
EPA 200.7
THALLIUM
ZINC
0.041
mg/L
0.036
mg/L
22
EPA 200.7
CYANIDE
<0.005
mg/L
<0.005
mg/L
4
EPA 335.4
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
HARDNESS (as
CaCO3)
.
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
Aluminum
0.178
mg/L
0.059
mg/L
3
EPA 200.7
Iron
0.205
mg/L
0.187
mg/L
3
EPA 200.7
Molybdenum
0.008
mg/L
.
0.003
mg/L
3
EPA 200.7
Chloride
88.0
mg/L
51.7
rng/L
3
SM 4500-CI C

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: 001- Results Attached (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTIC
AL
METHOD
MUMDL
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLON ITRI LE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
•
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: 001- Results Attached (Complete once for each outfall
discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information on other volatile organic
compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4,6-D IN ITRO-0-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information on other acid -extractable
compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: 001-Results Attached (Complete
once for each outfa I discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
,
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL) ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE

FA(:ILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
. Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: 001-Results Attached
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
• AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
FLUORANTHENE
•
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
INDEN0(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
1,2,4-
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g , pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF;:PART D
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1)'TO DETERMINE:WHICH OTHER PARTS -.
• OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE "

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
•
• SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
❑ chronic 0 acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number. Test number. Test number.
a. Test information. Results Attached
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s)
used. For multiple grab samples,
indicate the number of grab samples
used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,NC00375O8
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
.
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test senes.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
LCso
95% C.I.
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Chronic: •
NOEC
%
o
/o
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
/ /
/ /
/ /
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is
❑ Yes ® No
the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
Summary of results: (see instnictions)
All results are attached as well as a letter of explanation.
END'OF PART E
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE.1) TO DETERMINE_ WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A.YOU MUST COMPLETE..

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:.
Lumber
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL`USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
© Yes ❑ No
i
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 0
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of Gills. 4
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Erico Inc
Mailing Address: 188 Carolina Road
Aberdeen NC 28315
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Electroplating of grounding rods with copper and nickel
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Grounding Rods
Raw material(s): Steel rod and coil
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
12186.4 gpd (100% continuous or intermittent)
collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
433- Electroplating and Metal Finishing

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal .
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
U
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLAJRCRAIor other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE;1) TO DETERMINE,WHICH OTHER PARTS;`,
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE

Additional information, if provided, will appear on the following pages.
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION :'
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Meridian Kiosks
Mailing Address: 312 South Pine Street •
Aberdeen, NC 28315
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Degreasing and phosphorus wash of metal
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Kiosk machines
Raw material(s): Steel
F.6. Flow Rate.
c. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
157 gpd ( continuous or 100% intermittent)
collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intemiittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits El Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards El Yes 0 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
433- Electroplating and Metal Finishing
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes El No If yes, describe each episode.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Pinnacle Furnishings, Inc
Mailing Address: 10570 NC Hwy 211 East
Aberdeen, NC 28315
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Electroplating and anodizing of aluminum metal
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Furniture for hotels. casinos and restaurants
Raw material(s): Aluminum metal
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1550 gpd ( continuous or 100% intermittent)
collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards Ej Yes 0 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
433- Electroplating and Metal Finishing
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes 121 No tf yes, describe each episode.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION. INFORMATION,
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Thermal Metal Treating,_lnc
Mailing Address: PO Box 367
Aberdeen, NC 28315
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Electroplating and metal heat treating
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Residential and commercial door hardware, industrial tools and automotive components
Raw material(s): Brass steel, and nickel parts
F.6. Flow Rate.
g. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
540 gpd ( continuous or 100% intermittent)
collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
h. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
433- Electroplating and Metal Finishing
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

ADDENDUM 1
NPDES PERMIT #NC0037508
REQUEST FOR RENEWAL
January 12, 2009
Sludge Management Plan:
The Sludge Management Plan for the Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
consists of one item:
1. Disposal of Sludge as compost beginning in 2006. Compost ultimately is
distributed as a soil amendment.
The Land Application permit (Permit #WQ0018018) was rescinded January 2006. The
permit was never used.
If you have any questions concerning our Sludge Management Plan, please do not
hesitate to contact J. Brant Sikes at [phone].

q- q-
,,Nx•
.k• 041* .4-
4ve 4.. + Cks
4
it- 42 Q4Z. %,?5,- • '
1.0-13.4
rrt g.d.
1.0 -13.4
RAW SEWAGE 1
INFLUENT 1
1
1
GRIT
4- —
DISPOSAL
L
m.g.d.
1
1.0 -13.4 101
Return Activated 0-6.7 mad.
B.O.D. Make -Up 0 -1.4 m.a.d_ •
1
1
-PRIMARY SLUDGE
14- -
r 4_ WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE
_p_ — _J
SLUDGE
THICKENER
ANAEROBIC
DIGESTER
1.0 -13.4
Am.g.d.411'
45"
Return Activated 0-6.7m.a.d.
_J
SLUDGE DRYING BEDS
Drainage to
Raw Sewage Influent
dis
1.0 -134
m.g.d.
:.•••••r
EFFLUENT
Discharge.
001.
6.7 mgd
• . Sludge 'miposted
FIGURE 3-1 PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC

Sprin
Downstream Monitoring Point
(at NCSR 1225)
' /
Moore County WWTP
Receiving Stream:
State Grid / USGS
Aberdeen Creek
35° 04' 04" N
03-07-50
G 21SW / l'inebluff, N.C.
Drainage Basin: Lumber River
78° 28' 07" W
Permitted Flow: 6.7 MGD
Stream Class: C
-11(
, -2; •
•
Moore County WWTP
and Discharge Line
(Approximate Location)
NPDES Permit NC0037508
Moore County

ADDENDUM 2
NPDES PERMIT #NC0037508
REQUEST FOR RENEWAL
January 12, 2009
Whole Effluent Toxicity:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant has had failed toxicity tests since the
issuance of the current permit. The following is the explanation of the events and what
has been done to correct problems and prevent further toxic events.
In June 2006, chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia testing showed toxicity of the plant effluent
resulting in a fail. The test was run concurrent with the Long Term Monitoring sampling
which did not show any abnormal results. A toxicity test was conducted in July 2006
which also resulted in a fail (chronic value=14.5%). Additional tests were conducted
during the month of July including tests for pesticides and herbicides (EPA 8081A and
EPA 8‘141A). Results from these tests were all below detection limit (see attached). We
continued to look into what was happening on the plant to cause the toxicity. We
reviewed effluent results in toxicity vs. non -toxicity months, influent flow to the plant,
chlorination and dechlorination, odor reduction additives in the collection system (see
attached MSDS), metals in drinking water influent, septic hauler loads and Porto John
chemical use. Toxicity was conducted in August which resulted in a chronic value of
> 100%, a pass. Annual PPA testing was conducted in August. The result for the quarter
was a pass with an average of 57%.
Quarterly testing was conducted in September which resulted in a pass.
Quarterly testing was conducted in December which resulted in a fail. We discussed the
test with our commercial lab and tried to determine what time during the test the toxicity
started (see attached), investigated metals levels in the aeration basins (two stages) for the
previous four years, looked into the scheduled cleaning of clarifiers and basins on the
plant by our operations staff, tested Sulfur levels (see attached), and planned a split
sample with the Fayetteville DWQ office for January as part of our annual plant
inspection. January's split sample test resulted in a chronic value of 29% from Meritech,
our commercial lab, but due to the irregularities in the testing and paperwork, the Aquatic
Testing Unit invalidated the result (we do not have a copy of the ATU toxicity report).
The. ATU noted that there were `indigenous organisms in the sample which were
removed due to possible interference' with the test. Meritech did not note the same
organisms. Other items noted in the report from the ATU (see attached) were improper
procedures in splitting the sample between the two labs, irregularities in the chains -of -
custody, and cleaning procedures for containers and tubing. We were advised to make up
for the invalidated test in April 2007. The following items were changed following the
ATU report and discussion with our Fayetteville Regional DWQ Office representative:

Cleaning procedures for tubing are to be performed prior to the first use of the
tubing and every toxicity collection day following.
- Procedures for pouring samples into containers now allow proper mixing and
allow split samples to be split properly.
The location of toxicity sample collection is now at the effluent composite sample
location at the bottom of the cascade. Previously, it was just after the
dechlorination mixing site.
Chains -of -custody are to be filled out properly with all signatures needed and
anyone who assisted in the sample collection or handling is to be noted.
- Any plant process changes during the week prior and the week of toxicity testing
are to be made only by the ORC.
There is now no cleaning of clarifiers or basins during the week prior to and the
week of toxicity testing.
The use of the odor reduction additive into the collection system has been
discontinued.
Following these changes, in February we passed with 58%. In March 2007, we conducted
our regular quarterly testing. We split the sample between Meritech (our normal
commercial lab) and R&A Lab, both with resulted in a pass. In April, we conducted the
make up test for the invalidated January test and split the sample between Meritech and
R&A Lab again with results of>100% and 90.55% respectively.
Since January 2007, we have had no toxic events. In 2008 we conducted Fathead
Minnow testing during each quarter along with our normal Ceriodaphnia tests. All results
were passes.
Attached are all toxicity test results for the years of 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 and the
documents noted above.
If you have any questions concerning our past toxicity results, please do not hesitate to
contact J. Brant Sikes at [phone].

IECIEEVE
MAR CNFina
BY:
March 7, 2007
Mr. James D. Frye, Superintendent •
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315
Subject: January 24, 2007-Toxicity Test• •
Moore County WWTP '
NPDES No. NC0037508
Moore County
Mr. Frye,
"Thank you ,for submitting the supporting information requested for the January 24, 2007 effluent toxicity
test result for the Moore.County WWTP. All relevant information has been reviewed by Aquatic
'Toxicology Unit staff A. result of "invalid" -has been for recorded for the January 24, 2007 test.
To investigate the apparent difference in results obtained from the tests, we examined documentation
• concerning sampling, testing, and lab procedures. Water quality parameters of the control waters for the
tests were sirnilar. All quality assurance documentation from both labs was in order. However, in a phone
Conversation Ms. Janna Scherer had with a member,of our staff, Mr. Lance Ferrell, it was determined that
the 1/25/07-1/26/07 sample that the Aquatic Toxicology Unit received was not split with the sample for
Meritech, inc. it is our understanding that the courier from Meritech, Inc. arrived at your facility prior to
Mr. Dale Lopez, a staff member from the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office, and received. their sample.
Later when Mr. Dale Lopez arrived, the sample collector poured up: a second sample from the remaining
effluent in the sample container, and gave it to.hitn to be shipped to the Aquatic Toxicology Unit
laboratory. However, the Aquatic Toxicology Unit's second sample was not split with Meritech, Inc. The
sample should have been well mixed, then poured into each laboratory's separate containers at the same
time.
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
partment of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Also noted, were irregularities between the chain -of -custody forms submitted. Specifically, two separate
sample collection times and two different sample collectors were recorded for the 1/23/07 and 1/26/07 . -
samples. The chain -of -custody form for the Meritech, Inc.. laboratory records a collection time of 0958
hours for the 1/23/07 sample,'while the one completed for Aquatic Toxicology Unit records a time of
1000. The sample collector for the Meritech, Inc. laboratory was. Mr. Jeff Corder while the collector for
the Aquatic 'Toxicology Unit was Mr. Dale Lopez. This scenario'was repeated for the .1/26/07 sample, with
Mr. Jeff Corder the collector for Meritech, Inc. with a collection time of.101.8, and Mr. Dale Lopez'the
collector for Aquatic Toxicology Unit with a collection tine of 1000.
Maintaining accurate sample documentation (chain -of -custody) is important to insure that the sample was
properly handled from collection to test set-up. The sample collector is responsible for docuinenting in the
designated area found on each respective laboratory's chain -of -custody form the sample collector's
signature with the date/time of the collection. If:the sample collector transfers custody to another facility
staff member (e.g. for a sample split or preparation for shipment) both the collector and the transferee
Environmental Sciences Section 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Phone[phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27609 ' FAX [phone]
NoilhCarolina-
, alura!!g
An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper.

should sign with a date and time for the relinquishing and receipt of the sample. If two individuals are
involved in collection of the sample, as could be the case if one individual were to pour the sample into the
shipping containers while the other individual held the containers, then both individuals would be taking
part in the collection process. In this scenario both individuals were in possession of the sample and should
sign the chain -of -custody form. However, if the second individual was simply observing and not actually
handling the sample in any way, then that individual would not need to sign the chain -of -custody form.
Proper documentation of samples must be an integral portion of a monitoring program, and is the only way
we can properly evaluate potential differences in split samples.
It was also noted that the 1/23/07 and 1/26/07 Aquatic Toxicology Unit samples contained indigenous
organisms (i.e. daphnids), which if left in the test solutions may attack, compete for food, or be confused
with the test organism Ceriodaphnia duhia. The indigenous daphnids were removed from the Aquatic
Toxicology Unit's test cups when found. When Mr. Ferrell inquired about these organisms with Mr.
Michael Reed of Meritech, Inc., he indicated they had not noticed these organisms in any of the samples
they received.
Mr. Ferrell also discussed with Ms. Scherer the bioassay cleaning of the sample collection container. This
should be performed in order to avoid any potential toxicity carry over. I have enclosed a copy of the
recommended procedure for the bioassay cleaning of sample containers. If you or your staff should have
any questions regarding this procedure please contact me or Mr. Ferrell at 919-733-2136. •
Due to the irregularities associated with the splitting of the composite sample collected 1/25/07-
1/26/07, it is our best professional judgment that neither sample was .representative of the discharge. It
is the decision of this office' to invalidate both laboratory test results. If a chronic value of 29% test
result was submitted, we remind you that the Moore County WWTP monthly monitoring reports
(DMR) submitted to the Division's Central Files must be amended. The effluent DMR facility
information must be completely filled out (at the top of the sheet), and the form should have
"CORRECTED COPY" written or typed at the top.
/Sincerely,
•
I ; r
Cindy Moore, Supervisor
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
cc: Dale Lopez -FRO
Michael Reed-Meritech, Inc.
Central Files
Lance Ferrell
Enclosure

Page 1 of 1
Scherer, Janna
From: Mike Reed [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 11:23 AM
To: Scherer, Janna
Cc: Frank Pasztor
Subject: RE: January Tox
Janna,
Unfortunately, there is no way to pinpoint the time of the problem. It seems to me that the toxic effect had
been occuring throughout the test and seemed to have an additive effect as the test neared its completion. The
overall health and reproduction of the organisms deteriorated over the seven day testing period.
The average control first brood was 3.8. The average Moore Co. treatment first brood was 3.
The average control second brood was 7.42. The average Moore Co. Treatment second brood was 6.58.
The average control third brood was 9.5. The average Moore Co. treatment third brood was 5.83.
The control had 100% of the bugs having a third brood. The Moore Co. treatment had 83.3% of the bugs
having a third brood.
In all instances, the 41% treatment of Moore Co effluent did not meet the control standards. Over the course
of seven days, and three broods later, these small variations in brood size culminated into a statistically marked
difference in the control average reproduction (20.75) and that of Moore Co. (15.67). There was a percent
reduction of 25.5%. Unfortunately anything above a 20% reduction is considered a failure.
Mike Reed
Meritech, Bioassay Dept.
1-336-342-4748
Original Message
From: Scherer, Janna[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 3:25 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: January Tox
Mike,
I spoke to Dale Lopez with DWQ and he confirmed that we do need to run a multiple dilution on the
January and February Toxicity tests.
Also, Dale and Delmo Frye, our superintendent, would like to know if the sample was fine until the second
addition, or if the problems started with the first sample. We wanted to see if we could pinpoint the time of
the week the sample started to fail, and what was occurring at that time.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Janna
Janna Scherer
Lab Supervisor/ Pretreatment Coordinator
Moore County WWTP
910-281-3146
1/8/2007

Contact: Janna Scherer
Client: Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
MUMEWM
FEB 2 2 2007
B Y:
Report Date: 1/31/07
Revision Date: 2/19/07
Date Sample Rcvd: 1/23/07
Meritech Work Order # 01/30779 Sample: Effluent Composite 0123168
1j�»_r
� L3/07
Parameters Result Analysis Date Reporting Limit Method
Sulfur 3.79 m
1/31/07 0.1 mg/L EPA 200.7
Meritech Work Order # 01230780 Sample: PC Effluent Grab 0123169
1/23/2007
Parameters Result Analysis Date Reporting Limit Method
Sulfur 3.97 mg/L
1/31/07 0.1 mg/L EPA 200.7
I hereby certify that 1 have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
PRODUCT NAME: Odor Klean 200
GENERAL USE: Waste water odor control
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: Purple odorless liquid
MANUFACTURER'S NAME
American Development Corp.
ADDRESS (NUMBER, STREET, P.O. BOX)
1456 State Camp Rd.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET COUNTRY
Vanceboro, NC 28586
DISTRIBUTOR'S NAME
Same
USA
American
Development
Corporation
ADDRESS (NUMBER, STREET, P.O. BOX)
(CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE)
DATE PREPARED: August 9, 2006
SUPERSEDES: New
Page 1 of 4
TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR INFORMATION
[phone]
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER
CHEM • TEL [phone] Outside USA [phone]
TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR INFORMATION
COUNTRY
,.4
HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS 1 CAS #
Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (a,b)
(by weight) PPM I MG/M3
13477-34-4 50 - 60
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER
OSHA PEL 1 ACGIH TWA SARA l RQ
TITLE III I LBS
not established
PPM 1 MG/M3
(a) Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (13477-34-4) Is not listed on the Canadian DSL or NDSL because It Is a hydrate. The CAS number for the anhydrous form is
on the list. All other components of thls product Identified by CAS number are listed on the DSL or NDSL.
Thls
(b) product is subject to SARA section 313 reporting requirements - nitrate compounds (water dlssoctable).
•
:.•.......•.•....•.•......•......•.•................•.SECT%O/If:3-:H RDS::10 7. TIFI •• •:.:...:::....:.::::::::':.:.:.::::::::::•:•:::•:•:•:.:•::•:•::.:•:.:.:•:• • .•..
•
/...•.•.,.,.•...:.:.:.:.:.:.::•:•:•:•::•::•:•••:•::•::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::::::::
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW
Mild liquid, prolonged contact may cause skin & eye irritation. Ingestion may cause gastric distress. Hazard Symbols for this product - Not
classified. Risk Phrases - None
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS
INHALATION: Inhalation of mists or vapors may cause irritation to upper respiratory tract and mucous membranes. •
SKIN: Contact with skin may cause irritation, dermatitis.
EYES: Contact with eyes may cause pain and irritation.
INGESTION: May be irritating to digestive tract; may cause gastric distress, stomach pains.
CARCINOGENICITY NTP7 No IARCMONOGRAPHS7 No OSHA REGULATED? No

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
PRODUCT NAME: Odor Klean 200
August 9, 2006
. ........... • .........:::SE..TIQN. . .;-;F.SRES..:�>:
INHALATION: Remove affected person to fresh air; if s • smedical• • .
symptoms persist seek attention.
IPage 2 of 4
SKIN: Remove contaminated clothing; wash affected area with soap and water; launder contaminated clothing before reuse; if irritation
persists, seek medical attention.
EYES: Check for and remove contact lenses. Flush eyes with clear running water for 15 minutes while holding eyelids open; if irritation
persists, seek medical attention.
INGESTION: Give two glasses of water for dilution; DO NOT induce vomiting; never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person; seek
medical attention.
FLASH POINT (METHOD USED)
Non-flammable
SECTlt7/V;:=FIREFIGH'(/IIG:N1fSl::.:.
FLAMMABLE LIMITS LEL: Not applicable
AlTOIGNITION TEMPERATURE: Not determined
UEL: Not applicable
GENERAL HAZARDS: Product is not considered flammable or combustible. Products of combustion include compouNFPA CLASS:
nds of c bon, None
hydrogen and oxygen, including carbon monoxide and nitrates.
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA
Carbon dioxide, water, water fog, dry chemical, chemical foam.
FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES
Keep containers cool with water spray to prevent container rupture due to steam buildup; floor will become slippery if material is released.
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS
None
HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS
Smoke, fumes or vapors, oxides of carbon and nitrogen.
..:. SECT/O/ .....O AC 10.00. 4............................
STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: Confine and absorb into approved absorbent; place material into
approved containers for disposal; refer to SARA Title III, Section 313, 40 CFR 372 for complete regulations concerning reporting requirements
for nitrate compounds (water dissoclable).
e7-1
aLIN.G.. .
PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE: Keep container closed when not in use; protect containers from abuse;
protect from extreme temperatures. Keep this and other chemicals out of reach of children.
TI.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS
T
5.0 :::f?R4TECTL
The use of local exhaust ventilation is recommended. No other special controls are indicated.
PERSONAL PROTECTION:
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: None required while threshold limits are kept below maximum allowable concentrations; if TWA exceeds
standard workplace limits, NIOSH approved respirator must be worn. Refer to 29 CFR 1910.134 or European Standard EN 149 for complete
regulations.
PROTECTIVE GLOVES: Neoprene, butyl or nitrite rubber gloves with cuffs.
EYE PROTECTION: Chemical safety goggles. Refer to 29 CFR 1910.133 or European Standard EN166.
OTHER PROTECTIVE CLOTHING OR EQUIPMENT: Coveralls, apron, or other equipment should be worn to minimize skin contact, safety
eyewash station nearby.
WORK / HYGIENIC PRACTICES: Practice safe workplace habits. Minimize body contact with this, as well as all chemicals in general.

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
PRODUCT NAME: Odor Klean 200
August 9, 2006
VAPOR PRESSURE
17mm Hg @ 20° C
: E T1(O/lr! ••HY CAC ANFL HFtillc4G� PRL]PFRTIES
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (WATER = 1)
1.382
SOLUBILITY IN WATER
Complete
pH
6.5-7.5
BOILING POINT
>212°F (> 100° C)
VISCOSITY
Like that of water
STABILITY
VAPOR DENSITY (AIR = 1)
>1
EVAPORATION RATE (Water = 1)
<1
IPage 3 of 4
INCOMPATIBILITY (MATERIALS TO AVOID): Strong oxidizers, strong acids.
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION OR BYPRODUCTS: Decomposition will not occur if handled and stored properly. In case of a fire, oxides
of carbon, hydrocarbons, nitrogen, fumes or vapors, and smoke may be produced.
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION MAY OCCUR:
WILL NOT OCCUR: XXX
ICONDITIONS TO AVOID: None
Hazardous Ingredients
CAS #
EINECS #
LD50 of Ingredient
(Specify Species and Route)
....................
LC50 of Ingredient
(Specify Species)
Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (a,b)
13477-34-4
233-332-1
3900 mg / kg
Oral - rat
Not established
...........
;4fir?T%fAl::>
:_> 'ni: Si,P'Ais<:i::-
;t;.:::::;....,••...........•..
No data are available on the adverse effects of this material on the environment. Neither COD nor BOD data are available. Based on the
chemical composition of this product It is assumed that the mixture can be treated In an acclimatized biological waste treatment plant system
in limited quantities. However, such treatment should be evaluated and approved for each specific biological system. None of the ingredients
In this mixture are classified as a Marine Pollutant.
......... .................
C4.SLb R a: i..
WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: Dispose of in accordance with Local, State, and Federal Regulations. Product is classified as non -
hazardous, however, non -hazardous materials may become hazardous waste upon contact with other products. Refer to "40 CFR Protection
of Environment Parts 260 - 299" for complete waste disposal regulations. Consult your local, state, or Federal Environmental Protection
Agency before disposing of any chemicals.
:;:;:.:::.>:;:.:_:;;: a ca vnr:::>f ::: f IYSf'p ...: •:. FOR.•. '.'. .
PROPER SHIPPING NAME: Non - Hazardous for Transport
DOT HAZARD CLASS / Pack Group: Not regulated
REFERENCE: Not Applicable
UN / NA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: None
LABEL: None Required
HAZARD SYMBOLS: None
FREEZING POINT
0°F (<-18°C)
APPEARANCE AND ODOR
Purple liquid, odorless
PHYSICAL STATE
Liquid
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (Total VOC's)
None
SECTION: 10 $TABILfTY SAND � RAC
.. .. ...........................Tll/STY..,.......;.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.;.:.::.:•:.:�:.:.:.
UNSTABLE: CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Extreme temperatures.
STABLE: XXX
IATA HAZARD CLASS / Pack Group: Not regulated
IMDG HAZARD CLASS: Not regulated
RID/ADR Dangerous Goods Code: Not regulated
UN TDG Class / Pack Group: Not regulated
Hazard Identification Number (HIN): None
Note: Transportation information provided is for reference only. Client is urged to consult CFR 49 parts 100 - 177, IMDG, IATA, EC, United
Nations TDG, and WHMIS (Canada) TDG information manuals for detailed regulations and exceptions covering specific container sizes,
packaging materials and methods of shipping.

' MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
PRODUCT NAME: Odor Klean 200
August 9, 2006
::.:::::.:::•:.:�:::::::::�:.•.•.�•�.�.�.:.::.:.:.:::::•:�::......_._............ NTOR`Y::I/1FRNT/ :I::::"":•:•::::::::::::�:�:�:�::�:�:�::�:�:�:::::::::::::::::
TSCA (Toxic Substance Control Act)
All components of this product are listed on the U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act Chemical Inventory (TSCA Inventory) or are exempted
from listing because a Low Volume Exemption has been granted in accordance with 40 CFR 723.50.
SARA TITLE III (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act)
311/312 Hazard Categories
None
IPage 4 of 4
313 Reportable Ingredients:
(b) Indicates a toxic chemical subject to annual reporting requirements of Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right -To -
Know Act of 1986 and of 40 CFR 372.
CERCLA (Comprehensive Response Compensation and Liability Act)
None
California Prop 65, Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986
There are no chemicals present known to the state of Califomia to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity.
CPR (Canadian Controlled Products Regulations)
This product has been classified in accordance with the hazard criteria of the Controlled Products Regulations and the MSDS contains all
the information required by the Controlled Products Regulations. WHMIS Classification: Not controlled
IDL (Canadian Ingredient Disclosure List)
Components of this product Identified by CAS number and listed on the Canadian Ingredient Disclosure List are shown in Section 2.
DSL / NDSL (Canadian Domestic Substances List / Non -Domestic Substances List)
Components of this product Identified by CAS number are listed on the DSL or NDSL, or are otherwise In compliance with the New
Substances Notification (NSN) regulations. Only ingredients classified as "hazardous" are listed in Section 2 unless otherwise indicated.
EINECS (European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances)
Components of this product identified by CAS numbers are on the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances.
EC Risk Phrases
Not classified
SYMBOL(S) REQUIRED
FOR LABEL
None
EC Safety Phrases
S2 Keep out of the reach of children.
S24/25 Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
..................... .........................
Specific toxicity tests have riot been conducted on this product. Our hazard evaluation is based on Information from similar products, the
ingredients, technical literature, and/or professional experience.
HMIS HAZARD RATINGS
HEALTH
FLAMMABILITY
PHYSICAL HAZARD
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
1 • = Chronlc Health Hazard
0 0 = INSIGNIFICANT
0 1 = SLIGHT
C Safety Glasses, Gloves, Apron
2 = MODERATE
3 = HIGH
4 = EXTREME
REVISION SUMMARY:
This MSDS has been revised in the following
sections:
No changes noted
MSDS Prepared by: Chem -Tel, Inc.
1305 N. Florida Ave.
Tampa, Florida USA 33602
[phone] Outside USA [phone]
.............................................. .........................................
e Inr'ailnetiort;:;cx nteioed: hererp::;is: batiaved::.tri::.i�e'::&x ura :;:biit::la not irvarrestedd:::to:::be:sd :::Dat: sn .
Inanufectwor of.lha product end•mailu "rare ofTha """' nta.•o.• ... dvlso .d::oatoitrm )n::are: ce of::en:lilformetlari:::eton ed::.by,pt,
eppIIc b1 .::end.:auiDett::Tq;iha•c1R tMis;hlidee,:::Cf;'ile* 1%ondoi :: ti11w::isgrsoile::p:e�aniapaiy:::causad:;by:'1f1o:'rila�rtet it sefetl!:.P e4i! •:;e' iot segtj r ?.''''' p4 ? 1::(r1;1n® data Opeet. fiurttl$r<poee� von r 4CGumoe ny r ppj>tf¢Htry 1qr Injyry catt4ea: by at 1 Rnal.:.i;
dof tlile n to let; eyed:'. f t�soneblQ safety prpcsdyreti pre' *NtoiVad MY titt•- s: P1oaij�t: hoL?d::tie: direcffid: to::Cro: riaii4 Urer:>vr ttie: prvdiict::bo
esbiitied.Irt8a8tloii:l..:':•:{....•.•. :•:•}}:•:{?: i:•:•:: }::•}?::•:•:C•}:•i: ?}i......}}:•:•?}?i }::}}5:2 :::::::;_..,,:.;.;.; ..;;....;::? >:::::::................ _ . --............................. .

MERITECH, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Client: MCWWI'p
Project: 808I A •
Client Sample ID: Effluent 0725179
Sample Collection: 07/24-25/06
EPA 8081A - Organochlor•ine Pesticides
Parameter Result
. Merited' ID: 072506105
Extraction: 07/27/06
Analysis: 07/30/06
Analyst: • FP
Aldrin <0.05 ug/L.
a-BIIC <0.05 ug/L
b [31IC <0.05 ug/L
d-I3I1C <0.05 ug/L
g-B l tc <0.05 ug/L
a -Chlordane
g-Chlordane <0.05 ug/L
<0.05 ug/L
Chlordane
<00 ug/L
4,4'-DDD <0.05 ug/L
4,4'-DDE <0.05 ug/L
4,4'-DDT <0.05 ug/L
Uieldrin <0.05 ug/L
EndosulFan 1 <0.05 ug/L
Endosulfan II <0.05 ug/L
Endosulfan sulfate <0.05 ug/L
Endrin <0.05 ug/L
Endrin aldehyde <0.05 ug/L
Endrin ketone <0.05 ug/L,
Heptachlor <0.05 ug/L
Heptachlor epoxide <0.05 ug/L
Methoxychlor <0.05 ug/L
Toxaphene <5.00 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Riedsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

MERITECj-j INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Client: MCW WTP
Project: 814 I A
Client Sample ID: Effluent 0725179
Sample Collection: 07/24-25/06
Mcritech ID: 07250615 •
Extraction: 07/27/06
Analysis: 08/06/06 •
Analyst: TA
EPA 8141A - Organophosphorous Pesticides
Parameter Result
Azinphos-ethyl < 2.00 ug/L
Azinphos-methyl <2.00 ug/L
[3olstar <2.00 ug/L
Carbophenothion <4.00 ug/L
Chlorphenvinphos < 2.00 ug/L
Chlorpyrifos <2.00 ug/L
Coumafos <2.00 ug/L
Demeton-S <2.00 ug/1..
Diazinon < 2.00 ug/L
Dichlorvos < 2.00 ug/L
Dimethoate <2.00 ug/L
Dioxalhion <4.00 ug/L
Disulfoton <4.00 ug/L
[ PN <2.00 ug/L
Ethi°n <4.00 ug/L
Ethoprop <2.00 ug/L
Fenilrothion <4.00 ug/L
Fensulfothion <2.00 ug/L
Fenfhi°n <2.00 ug/L
Leptophos < 2.00 ug/L
Malachion <2.00 ug/L
Mcrphos <2.00 ug/L
Mcvinphos <2.00 ug/L
Monocrotophos <2.00 ug/L
Naleti <2.00 ug/L
Parathion -ethyl < 2.00 ug/L
Parathion -methyl <2.00 ug/L
Phorate < 2.00 ug/L
Phosmct <4.00 ug/L
Phosphamidon < 2.00 ug/L,
Bonnet < 4.00 ug/L
Stirophos <2.00 ug/L
Sulfotep <2.00 ug/L
Tcrbufos <2.00 ug/L
'I'ohuthion < 2.00 ug/L
Trichlorortalc <2.00 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

,,Testikm.erica
ANALYTICAL TESTING CORPORATION
Client Meritech, Inc. (2822)
642 Tantco Road
Reidsville, NC 27320
AIM Prank Paszlor
Anal1•te
2960 Foster Creighlon Road Nashville, TN 37204 • 800.765.0900 • Fax [phone]
Work Order:
Project Name:
Project Number:
Received:
ANALYTICAL REPORT
............ Result .. .Flag Units
Sample ID: NPG3298-0II2E1 (0725104 -
Organopllosphorus Pesticides by Water)) -cant. Sampled: 07/25/06 08:00
fenthiott EPA Method 8141A - cont.
Leptophos ND
ND ug/L
IvIela[I iuit ug/L
Met phos ND
ND ug/L
Mcvinphos ug/L
Mrntocrotopltos ND
ND ug/L
Haled ug/L
Parathion-ethylND
ND ug/L
Parathion -methyl ue/L
Phonate ND
ND ug/L
Phosmet ug/L
Phosphamitlon ND
ND ug/L
Ronne) ug/L
Stiroplros ND
ND ug/L
Sulfotep ug/L
'Ferbu fos ND
ND ug/L
Tokuthion(prothiofos) ug/L
i'richlnronale ND
ug/L
ND Srr•r:• Tribury1 phosphate (60-140%) ug/L
lre
Surr: Tripm•l phosphate (60-140%) 71
7//
Sample ID: NPG3298-02 (0725105 -
Oreallochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 081�5ampled: 07/25/06 08:03
Aldrin
delta-131IC ND
alpha-1314C ND
beta-011C ND
gamma-131IC (I-indane) ND
alpha -Chlordane ND
gamma -Chlordane ND
Chlordane ND
4,4'-DDD ND
4,4•-DDIE ND
4.4'-UDT ND
bicldrin ND
Iindosulfan 1 ND
Lndosulfan II ND
Endosulfan sulfate ND
Erulrin ND
Emir in aldehyde ND
Endrin ketone ND
Heptachlor ND
Heptachlor epoxide ND
Mcthoxychlor ND
ND
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ugIL
MRL
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
3.00
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
0.0500
NPG3298
Meritech, Inc.
(none)
07/26/06 08:50
Dilution Analysis
Factor Date/Time
Alcthurl batch
08/06/06 15:18 SW646 614IA 6075748
08/06/06 15.18 SW346 614IA 6073746
06/06/06 15:18 SW846 r 141A 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 8141A 6075746
08/06/06 15.18 SW646 8141A 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 8141A 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 8141A 6075748
06/06/06 15:18 SW846 8141A 6075746
08/06/06 15:1 S SW646 8 i 4 I A 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 814IA 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846814IA 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 814IA 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 8141A 6075746
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 614IA 607574R
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 6141A 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 9141 A 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW646 8141A 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW846 3141A 6075748
08/06/06 15:18 SW84681-114 6075748
08/06/06 /5:18 Slr846 81,11A 6075748
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081 A 6074702
07/30/06 13.45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8061 A 607.1702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 6081 A 6074702
07/30./06 13:45 5W346 SOS I A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 6081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 6081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW646 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 8081A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 808I A 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 808IA 6074702
07/30/06 13:45 SW846 6081.1 6074702
Page 3 of 13

Test/merjcaii
ANALYTICAL TESTING CORPORATION
Client Meritech, Inc. (2822)
642 Tamco Road
Work Order; NPG3298
Reidsville, NC 27320 Project Name:
AUn Frank Pasztor Meritech, Inc.
Project Number: [none]
Received: 07/26/06 08:50
2960 Foster Creighton Road Nashville. TN 37204 • 800.765-0960 • Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Analyfc
Result Flag • Dui Is
Dilution
Sample ID: NI'G3298-
MRL Analysis
O2 (0725105 - + Factor Date/Time MethodBatch
Organoclllorine Pesticides byWater) - cony, Sampled: 07/25/06 08:03 .
Tbxaphcnc EPA Method 8081A -cony.
Sm'r: Tettachloro-meta-aplene ND
88 % ug/L • 5,00
Su,p Daochht+obgllrent'1 r"-,e (58-117%)1 1 07/30/06 13:45
66 % SW846 8081A 6074702
2
Organophosl'htlftts Pesticides by07/30t06 /3:45. SIP:4j6 70,71. EPA Method S 141A 07,3206 /;; /; "i7'{" 7
Azinphos-ethyl SIIW-1680814 6074702
Azn,phos-mcthyl ND ug/L
13olstar ND 1.00 08/06/06 12:54 ,
ND ug/L 1.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
Carbophenothion ug/L I 08/06/06 12;54
ND 1.00 S1d 84G S 141 A 6074805
CI1lorfcm'inpltos ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54
ND 2.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
Cltlorpyrifos ug/L 1 08/06/06 12:54 SW846 8141A C oumaphos ND i .00 1 08/06/06 12:54 6074805
ND ug/L 1.00 SWS l6 8141A 6074805
Dcntcton-S ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54 SW846 8141A Drazinon ND I.00 I 08/06/06 12:546074805
ND ug/L 1.00 SW846 3141A 6074805
Diclllonos tm/L I 08/06/06 12:54 SW846 S141A Dimethome ND 1.00 I 08/06/06 12:54 +,, 6074805
ND ug/L I.00 Sly �a6 8191A 6074805
Dloxatllion ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54 SW846 S141A Disulfoton ND 1.00 I 08/06/06 12:54 6074805
ug/L
SWSa6S14iA 6074805
EPN ND 2,00 I 0S/06l06 12:54 ,
ND ug/L 2.00 SN S46 8141A 6074805
Clltrort ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54 SW846 8141A 6074805
Ethoprop ND 1.00 I 08/06/06 12:54
ND ug/L 2,00 SW846 8141A 6074805
Fenitrothinn 1 08/06/06 12:54 SW846 8141A
ND ug/L 1.00 6074805
Fcnsulfothio❑ ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54 SW846 8141A
Fen titian
ND 2.00 1 08/06/06 12:54 607 805
ND ug/L 1.00 Std S46 3141 A 6074805
Leptnphos ug/LI 08/06/06 12:54 514�8463141A Malathion ND 1.00 I 08/06/066074805
ug/L 1.00 12;54 SW846 8141A 6074805
Mcr111,os ND ug/L1 08/06/06 12:54
ND 1.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
hlcvinph°s ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54 SW8468141A M nocrotophos ND 1.00 I 08/06/06 12:54 6074805
ND ug/L I.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
M
Na led
ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54 SH'S16 b'141. Parathion -ethyl ND 1.00 1 08/06/06 12:546074805
ND ug/L 1.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
Parathion -methyl ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54
NU 1.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
Phonate ug/L 1 08/06/06 1254 SW846 8141A 6074805
' Phosmct ND 1.00 I 08/06/06 12:54
ND ug/L 1.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
1'hospharnldon ug/L 08/06/06 12:54
ND 2.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
Bonnet ug/L 1 08/06/06 12:54 SWS46 8141A S ti r ophos N D 1.00 I 08/06/06 12:54 6074805
ND ug/L 2.00 S W846 S 141 A 6074805
Sulfolcl' ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54 SW846314IA
Tcrbufos ND 1.00 I 08/06/066074805
ND °�L 1 00 12:54 SW846 8141A 6074805
Tokuthion(prothiofos) ug/L I 08/06/06 12:54
ND 1.00 SW8468I4lA 6074805
fricllloronatc ug/L ! 08/06/06 12;54
ND 1.00 SW846 8141A 6074805
Sun": Trihuryl phosphate (60-140%) 1 08/06/06 12:54 SW846
Surr: for hen,! 191 % ugh 1.008141A 6074805
p ) phosphate (60-140%) Z2 I 08/06/06 12:54 SW846 8141A
184 % Z2 08/06/06 12:54 6074805
SN 846 81414 6074805
08/06/06 12:54 SW846 8/414 6074805
Page 4 of 13

Contact:
Client:
Janna Scherer
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
7.[FOZMIWIEr
0 C I 1L�
Kg
3::
BY:
Report Date:
Date Sample Rcvd:
v
10/ 7/ 08
9/25/08
leritech Work Order # 09250859
Parameters
•Antimony, total
- Arsenic, total
•Beryllium, total
'Cadmium, total
•Calcium, total
• Chromium, total
• Copper, total
• Lead, total
• Mercury, total
• Nickel, total
• Selenium, total
• Silver, total
• Thallium, total
• Zinc, total
•Hardness, total
EPA 625 BNA
Sample: 0925205 Effluent Composite
Result
< 0.025 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.005 mg/L
< 0.002 mg/L
28.3 rng/L
< 0.005 mg/L
0.014 mg/L
< 0.010 ing/L
< 0.0002 mg/L
< 0.010 ing/L
< 0.010 mg/ L
< 0.005 mg/L
< 0.020 mg/L
0.034 mg/L
77.4 mg eq CaCO3/L
Attached
Analysis Date
10/2/08
10/2/08
10/2/08
10/2/08
9/29/08
10/2/08
10/2/0,8
10/2/08
9/30/08
10/2/08
10/2/08
10/2/08
10/2/08
10/2/08
9/29/08
10/2/08
Reporting Limit
0.025 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.002 mg/ L
0.100 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.002 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.0002 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.020 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.662 mg eq CaCO3/L
9/ 24-25/ 08
Method
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 245.1
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
SM 2340B
Meritech Work Order #
Parameters
• Cyanide, total
• Phenols, total
EPA 624 A+A
Trip Blank
09250860
Result
< 0.005 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
Attached
Attached
Sample: 0925199 Effluent Grab
Analysis Date
10/3/08
9/30/08
9/29/08
9/29/08
Reporting Limit
0.005 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
9/25/0$ 1
138 lo(20/00
;;, CoC'
Method
EPA 335.4
EPA 420.1
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratorij Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Accnaphthylene
Anthraccne
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrcne
3,4-Benzofluoroanthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bcnzo(g,h,i)perylene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1 ,2-Dich lorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dich lorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
<10
< I 0
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
PPA
Effluent 0925205
09/25/08
Merited' ID#:
Analysis:
Extraction:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor:
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Result
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<50 ug/L
<I0 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Parameter
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
lsophorone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodirnethylarnine
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylarnine
N-Nitrosodiphenylarnine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
p-chloro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2-N itrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1 hereby certify that 1 Have reviewed and approve these data.
r)CT
B Y:
09250859
10/02/08
09/29/08
MC
Result
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECI-I, INC.
Moore Co. WWTP
PPA
Trip Blank
09/25/08
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Meritech ID#:
Analysis:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor:
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Paraineter
Resuii
Benzene < 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromornethane < 1.00 ug/L
Bromoform < 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide <5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride < 1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
Chloroethane <5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether < 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform < 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Chloride <5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane < 1.00 ug/L
I,2-Dibromoethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenz_ene < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
l,2-Dichloropropane < 1.00 ug/L
cis-I,3-Dichloropropylene < 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene < 1.00 ug/L
Ethyl benzene < 100
Methylene chloride < 1.00. ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
Toluene < 1.00 ug/L
I ,1,1- I richloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
l ,1,2-Trichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofuoromethane <5.00 ug/L.
Vinyl chloride <5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrilc
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
<50.0 ug/L
<10.0 ug/L
09250860tb
09/29/08
VWV
1
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Moore Co. WWTP
PPA
Effluent 0925201
09/25/08
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Meritech ID#:
Analysis:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor:
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Benzene
Dichlorobromomethane
Bromoform
Methyl Bromide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
Chlorodibromomethane
1,2-Di bromoethane
1, I -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans- l ,2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<•1.00 ug/L
<5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
<5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< f.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<5.00 ug/L
<5.00 ug/L
<50.0 ug/L
<10.0 ug/L
09250860
09/29/08
VWV
1
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Contact:
( lic�nL'
Janna Scherer
Moore County WWII'
109,1 Achim Road
Aberdeen, NC 283.15
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Report Date:
Date Sample Rcvd:
6/20/07
5/22/07
Meritech Work Order 11 05220787
Parameters
Result
Sample: 05211.53 Effluent Composite
Antimony, total < 0.025 mg/L
Arsenic, total <0.010 mg/1_,
Beryllium, total < 0.005 mg/L
Cadmium, total < 0.002 mg/ L
Calcium, total 32.0 rng/L
Chromium, total < 0.005 mg/L
Copper, tc.ntaI 0.013 mg/I.,
I,eacl, total < 0.010 mg/L
klerenry, total < 0.0002 mg/L.,
N ickel, total < 0.010 mg/1.,
Selenium, total <0.010 m * I
Silver, total < 0.005 mg/L
'thallium, total < 0.020 mg/L.
/inc, total 0.036 mg/1...
I I,►rdHess, total 82.2 mg cc1 CaCO /L
I.R\ 625 8NA\ Attached
Analysis Date
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/29/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
5/25/07
6/13/07
Reporting Limit
0.025 mg/L
0.010 mg/ L
0.005 mg/L
0.002 mg/1,
0.100 mg/L
0.005 mg/I,
0.002 mg/L
0.0:10 mg/11,
0.0002 mg/I,
0.010 mg/I,
0.010 mg/L
0.005 mg/ L
0.020 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.662 mg N CaCO3/ L
5/20-21/07
Method
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 245.1
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
SM 2340B
R leritech Work Order 11 05220788 Sample: 0521202 Effluent Grab
iaramete►s
(-yanidC, total
1'1:.^„u1s, total
62.1A►A
nip !Hank
Result
< 0.005 mg/I,
< 0.010 mg/l..
Attached
Attached .
Analysis Date
5/3'1 /07
. 6/5/07
6/4/07
6/4/07
Reporting Limit
0.005 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
5/ 2'1/07
Method
EPA 335.2
EPA 420.1
1 thereby certify that 1 have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Keidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
_ Benzo(a)anthraccne
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4-Benzofluoroanthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
B is(2-ch Ioroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
B is(2-ch loroisopropyl)ether
B is(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-oetyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
MERITEcM INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
PPA
Effluent 0521 153
05/20-21/07
Meritech ID#: 05220787
Analysis: 06/13/07
Extraction: 05/24/07
Analyst: FAP
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Result Parameter
<10 ug/L Fluoranthene
<10 ug/L Fluorene
<10 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene
<50 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene
<10 ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<10 ug/L Hexachloroethane
<10 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<10 ug/L Isophorone
<10 ug/L 2-Methylnaphthalene
<10 ug/L Naphthalene
<10 ug/L Nitrobenzene
<10 ug/L N-Nitrosodimethylamine
<10 ug/L N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
<10 ug/L N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10 ug/L Phenanthrene
<10 ug/L Pyrene
<10 ug/L 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L p-chloro-m-cresol
<10 ug/L 2-Chlorophenol
<10 u0/1. 2,4-Dichlorop!tenol
<10., ug/L 2,4-Dimethylphenol
<50 ug/L 2,4-Dinitrophenol
<10 ug/L 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
<10 ug/L 2-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L 4-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L Pentachlorophenol
<10 ug/L Phenol
<10 ug/L 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
l hereby certify that 1 have reviewed and approve these data.
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax
Result
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L.
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<I0 ug/L
. <10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ugJI.
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L'
Laboratory Representative

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
PPA
Trip Blank
05/21/07
Analysis:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor: 1
Meritech ID#: 05220788TB
06/04/07
VWV.
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Benzene
Dichlorobromomethane
Bromoform
Methyl Bromide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
Chlorodibroinomethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
l,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1, l -Dichloroethylene
trans-1;2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
I ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1 ..00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00ug/L
1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
<50.0 ug/L
<10.0 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tarnco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320.
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
PPA
Effluent 0521202
05/21/07
Meritech ID#: 05220788
Analysis: 06/04/07
Analyst: VWV
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Benzene
Dichlorobromomethane
Brotnoform
Methyl Bromide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
Chlorodibrotnomethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
l,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
Ethyl benzene.
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
1 hereby certify that 1 have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L-
< 1.00 ug/L
•< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<.1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
.<50.0 ug/L
<10.0 ug/L
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
1ttn: Ms. Stephanie I3riaev Page 2 of 2
Chem:i\loore Count}- \\ '\\''1'P •Report Date:
1(194 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
9/6/06
Date Sample Revd: 8/15/06
t\leritecli Work Order #
Parameters
08150674 Sample: 1'PA 0815124
8/ 15/2006
Result Analysis Date Reporting P g Limit Method
Antimony, total < 0.025 m/g/L 8/23 06
Arsenic, total 0.025 trig/I.EPA 200.7
< 0.010 mg/L 8/23/06
.Ani miilium, total < 0.005 mg/L 8/23/06 23/06 0.010 mg/L EPA 200.7
Cadmium, total 0.005 rng/L EPA 200.7
< 0.002 mg/L 8/23/06
Beryllium,
Calcium, total 0.002 mg/L EPA 200.7
40.5 mg/L 8/29/06 0.100 mg L
Chromium, total / EI'A 200.7
< 0.005 mg/L 8/23/O6 O.00S rn L �.
Copper, total 0.021 mg/L 8/23/06 g/ EPA 200.7
.Lead, total 0.002 mg/L EPA 200.7
< 0.010 mg/L 8/23/06
\ [ pp rt , total 0.010 mg/L EPA 200.7
< 0.0002 mg/L 8/31 /06
Nickel, total 0.0002 mg/L EPA 245.1
< 0.010 mg/L 8/23/06
Selenium, lerc,total 0.010 mg/L I3P_1 200.7
Thallium, total
< 0.010 mg/L 8/23/06 0.010 mg/L EPA 200.7
<0,020 mg/L
Zinc, total 8/23/06 0.020 mg/L EPA 200.7
0.036 mg/L 8/23/06 0.010 m L
Hardness, Ichtal g/ EP.\ 35.2
I10 mg eq CaCO;/L 8/29/06 0.662 mg eci CaCO;/L EPA 200.7
Cyanide, total < 0.005 mg/L
Phenol, total 8/25/06. .005 mg/L EPA 335.2
<0.010 mg/L 8/22/06
L•1'.\ 608 0.010 mg/1:. EPA 420.1
attached 8/18/06
LP:\ 624+Acrolcin+.\crylinitrile attached
11.PA 625 8/25/06
attached 8/28/06
t hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
624 + Acrylonitrile & Acrolein
Trip Blank
08/15/06
Meritech ID#: 08150674TB
Analysis: 08/25/06
Analyst: CAH
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Benzene
Dichlorobromomethane
Bromoform
Methyl Bromide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
Chlorodibromomethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-1, 2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichooroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
1.50 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
<.1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
1.45 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 50.0 ug/L
< 10.0 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample Ill:
Sample Collection:
MERITECI-I, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
624 + Acrylonitrile & Acrolein
0815124 Effluent
08/15/06
Meritech ID#: 08150674
Analysis: 08/25/06
Analyst: CAH
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Benzene
Dichlorobrotnomethane
Bromoform
Methyl Bromide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
Chlorodibromomethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
.< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 50.0 ug/L
< 10.0 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)antltracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4-Benzofluoroanthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo (g, h, i)peryl ene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
B is(2-chloroctlioxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)etlter.
B is(2-ch loroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)plithalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorohenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
625
0815124 Effluent
08/15/06
Meritech ID#:. 08150674
Analysis: 08/28/06
Extraction: 08/21/06
Analyst: CAH
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Result
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Parameter
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
3exachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene_
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-N itrosodimethylam ine
N- N i t rosod i-n-p ropyl am i ne
N-Ni trosod iphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
p-chloro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4, 6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2-Nitrophenol.
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<,10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

r\rtn:
Client:
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
\[s. Stephanie Brixci Report Date: 1/18/06
Moore County \VWTP
1094 \ddor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Date Sample Rcvd: 12/29/05
Cyanide, total < 0.005 m I
g/ 1/6/06 0.005 mg/1 EPA 335.2 EPA 624+Acrolein+Acrylinitrile attached 1/6/06
\Icritech \C'ork Order # 12290585 Sample: Effluent Grab 1229251 2(
12/�)/(15
Parameters Result Analysis Date
Y Reporting Limit Method
Antimony, total < 0.025 mg /1 12/30/05
Arsenic, total 0.025 mg/I EPA 200.7
< 0.010 mg/1 12/30/05 0.010 m I
Beryllium, total < 0.005 m12/30/05 2
g/1 g/ EPA 200.7
Cadmium, total < 0.005 mg/1 EPA 200.7
0.002 mg/1 12/30/05 0.002 mg/1 EPA 200.7
Calcium, total 39.2 mg/I
Chromium, total < 0.005 m1 1/4/06 0.100 mg/1 EPA 200.7
Copper, total g/ 12/30/05 0.005 mg/1 EPA 200.7
0.008 m 1
g/1 12/30/05 0.002 mg/I EPA 200.7
Lead, total < 0.010 m
g/ 12/30/05 0.010 mg/1 EPA 200.7
Mercury, total < 0.0002 to > 1
b/ 1/5/06 0.0002 mg/1 EI'r\ 245.1
Nickel, total < 0.010 m 1
Selenium, total g/ 12/30/05 0.010 mg/1 EPA 200.7
< 0.010 mg/1 05 12 30
Silver, total/ / 0.010 mg/I EPA 200.7
< 0.005 mg/I 12/30/05 0.005 mg/1 EPA 200.7
Thallium, total < 0.020 mg/1
Zinc, total b/ 12/30/05 0.020 mg/1 EPA 200.7
0.035 mg/1 12/30/05 0.010 mg/1 EPA 200.7
I lardness, total 108 mg eq CaCO3/1 1/4/06 0.662 mg eq CaCO3/1 EPA 200.7
Phenol, total
mg/l 11/9/005 0.010 mg/] EPA 420.1
EPA 625 attached
EPA 608 attached 1/4/06
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
�lt4c a v /s_/ . <t'.17.:;e -t.--..
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
624 + Acrylonitrile & Acrolein
Trip Blank
12/29/05
Meritech ID#: 12290585TB
Analysis: 01/06/06
Analyst: CAH
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Benzene
D ichlorobromomethane
Bromoform
Methyl Bromide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Cliloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
Ch l orod i b romomethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< .5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< •5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 50.0 ug/L
< 10.0 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERI TECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
624 + Acrylonitrile & Acrolein
1229251 Effluent
12/29/05
Meritech ID#:
Analysis:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor:
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Benzene
Dichlorobromomethane
Bromoform
Methyl Bromide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
Chlorodibromomethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloro/ethane
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1, 1-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and 'approve these data.
Result
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
1.74 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1• .00ug/L,(
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 1.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 5.00 ug/L
< 50.0 ug/L
< 10.0 ug/L
12290585
01/06/06
CAH
1
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Beiizo(a)pyrene
3,4-Benzofluoroanthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g.h,i)perylene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
B is(2-ethy lhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
2-Chlo ronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
MERITECI-I, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
625
1229251 Effluent
12/29/05
Merited' ID#:
Analysis:
Extraction:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor:
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Result
Parameter
<10 ug/L Fluoranthene
<10 ug/L Fluorene
<10 ug/L Hexachlorobenzene
<50 ug/L Hexachlorobutadiene
<10 ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<10 ug/L Hexachloroethane
<10 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<10 ug/L Isophorone
<10 ug/L 2-Methylnapthalene
<10 ug/L Naphthalene
<10 ug/L Nitrobenzene
<10 ug/L N-Nitrosodimethylamine
<10 ug/L N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
<10 ug/L N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10 ug/L Phenanthrene
<10 ug/L Pyrene
<10 ug/L 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L p-chloro-m-cresol
<10 ug/L 2-Chlorophenol
<10 ug/L 2,4-Dichlorophenol
<10 ug/L 2,4-Dimethylphenol
<50 ug/L 2,4-Dinitrophenol
<10 ug/L 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
<10 ug/L 2-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L 4-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L Pentachlorophenol
<10 ug/L Phenol
<10 ug/L 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
12290585
01/09/05
01/04/05
CAH
Result
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug%L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320.
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

/
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 12/29/08
Facility: MOORE COUNTY WWTP
Laboratory- Pyrform,ing,Test.. MERITECH, INC
STat� of
NPDES#: NO0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Operator in Responsible
27224
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Charge
Comments: dilution water batch
711 also used, hard = 48, cond-=
180
,* PASSED: 17.73% Reduction *
Work Order:
-;r .aet•
MAIL ORTGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1 2 3 4 5
6
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
25
24
24
24
22
23123
23
23
24
23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2
3
4
5
6
10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
21
17
19
23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
2;120I10
I
L 'L IL
19
20
18
14
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 5.907
Tabular t = 2.650
% Reduction = 17.73
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.50
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
19.33
Treatment
2
Control CV
3.395%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st
7.90
7.85
7.57
7.73
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.70
7.37
7.69
7.34
sample
7.90
7.75
7.74
7.67
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.65
7.60
7.66
7.60
2nd sample
7.90 7.75
-I
4-
a
r
t
2nd
e
d
7
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as
combining
rep s,
%
%
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/17/08
Collection. (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/15/08 Sample 2: 12/18/08
Sample Type/Duration
Sample
Sample
Grabl1Comp.
X
Duration
22.8 hrs
is 124.6 hrs
I ,
Hardness(mg/1)
:'nec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
D
I
L
U
T
40
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
179
402
416
<0.1
<0.1
1.1
0.6
'Concentration
Morta'_ it'.
start/end
Method nination
Moving Aver,;c;e Probit
Spearman Kar-)-er - Other -
Organism Tested:
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev.
1
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
pH
Duration(hr$:) :
fUBIA ver. 1.41)
High
Conc.
D.C.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Date:12/29/2008
Facility: Moore County NPDES # NC00 37508
Pipe #: 001 County: Moore
Laboratory: Meritech, lnc.
x
lam.
Signatyre of erato in Responsible Charge
X Y'
"//.7
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Comments
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time 12/16/2008 3:45 PM
OA
Eff.
!Control
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
10.25
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
20.5
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
41 1
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
8
2 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
100 I
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU)'nit/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
Dilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
1
2
3
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.582
0.570
0.525
0.680
10
10
8
8
10
10
10
10
0.609
. 0.483
0.610
0.468
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.474
. 0.586
0.628
0.518
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.603
0.461
0.473
0.539
10
9
10
• 10
10
10
10
10
0.574
0.489
0.589
0.582
10
10
8
10
10
10
10
10
0.578
0.578
0.481
0.693
Day
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.589
100.0
0.589
90.0
0.543
97.5
0.552
97.5
0.519
97.5
0.559
95.0
0.583
0
2
3
7.98 /
7.73
7.99 /
7.72
7.93 /
7.65
7.85 /
7.60
7.90 /
7.82
7.86 /
7.53
8.03 /
7.86
7.63 /
7.14
7.58 /
7.70
7.80 /
7.24
7.60 /
7.85
8.00 /
7.83
7.90 /
6.90
7.93 /
7.60
25.0 /
24.8
24.9 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.7
25.0 /
24.9
24.9 /
25.0
25.0 /
24.6
24.9 /
24.4
0
2
3
6.97 /
7.33
7.18 /
7.48
7.21 /
7.21
7.02 /
7.54
7.35 /
7.49
7.45 /
7.27
7.03 /
7.49
8.27 /
6.74
7.87 /
7.48
7.82 /
6.49
8.36 /
7.85
8.00 /
7.73
8.03 /
7.29
7.96 /
7.48
25.0 /
24.8
24.9 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.7
24.8 /
24.9
24.9 /
25.0
25.0 /
24.6
24.9 /
24.4
1
2
3
12/15/2008
12/16/2008
12/18/2008
22.8
23.3
24.6
80
78
82
34
37
34
404
410
412
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.1
0.5
0.6
318
214
48
57
319
320
216
46
40
56
54
197
321
205
42
52
Normal
Hom. Var.
NOEC
LOEC >100 >100
Survival
L, I .
100
Growth
ICI
100
ChV >100
>100
Method Steel's Dunnet's
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
1;7' Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 12/15/08
Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
Overall Result
ChV
>100
Stats
Conc.
10.25
20.5
41
82
Survival
Critical Calculated
10 14
10 16
10 16
10 16
Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41 0.9506
2.41 0.7676
2.41 1.4285
2.41 0.6253
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
100
10 16
2.41 0.1373

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute
Facility: MOORE COUNTY WWTP
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pi
!Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC
1anature of Operator in Responsible Char
. .%r
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
pJ� untyLJ MOORE
/02/06
Comments: dilution water batches
692 & 693 used for analysis
* PASSED: 2.80% Reduction *
:•+ork Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Young Produced
24
20
25
26
27
27
21
21
23
22
26
24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %:
: 41%
TREATMENT ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Young Produced
24
26
28
18
21
27
24
18
20
20
26
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
1st sample
PH
Control II7.91
Treatment 2 L7.64 7.82
7.81
Control
t
a
r
t
1st
1st sample
7.92
7.78
7.73
7.71
S
e t
n a
d r
t
sample 1st sample
7.401
7.60
Treatment 2 1 7 . 62
7.40
e
n
d
7.60
7.33
7.55
7.22
2nd sample
7.92
7.68
7.67
7.58
S
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
7.55
7.16
7.53
7.05
LCS0/Acute Toxicity Test
;Mortality expressed as %, combinin
replicates
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.532
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 2.80
% Mortality
0.00
Control.
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
10.252 %
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
Avg . Reprod .
23.83
Control
23.17
Treatment 2
PASS
XI!
Check One
FAIL
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/24/08
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/22/08 Sample 2: 09/25/08
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
24.9 hrs
24.1 hrs
2nd.'r 1st r'
D
T ;7
L A
IJ M 1,•.,
T P =
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
44
182
42.3 425
<0.11 <C.11
0.3 1.5 1
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
L'50 - %
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
1
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
1
High
rrs,n
_ I
•
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Moore County
Date:10/3/2008
x
Laboratory: Meritech, Inc.
NPDES # NC00 37508 Pipe #: 001 . County: Moore
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Comments
C�
41A11.ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time
Eff.
ICont
Rept.
rot Surviving #
Original #
Wtloriginal (mg)
10.2 I
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
20.5 I
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
41
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
82 I
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
100
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original.(mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
Dilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
9/23/2008
1
2
2:40 PM
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
10
10
10
10.
10
10
.'10
10
0.482
0.470
0.483
0.545
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.515
0.481
0.520
0.510
9
10
9
8
10
10
10
10
0.382
0.431
0.382
0.413
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.594
0.426
0.444
0.372
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.515
0.473
0.510
0.503
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.528
0.450
0.488
0.544
0
Day
% Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.495
100.0
0.495
100.0
I 0.507
90.0
0.402
100.0
0.459
100.0
0.500
100.0
0.503
•
7.93 /
7.83
' 8.08 /
7.86
8.15 /
7.83
8.08 /
7.81
7.85 /
7.80
8.08 /
7.94
8.09 /
7.75
7.54 /
7.26
7.58 /
7.26
7.55 /
7.05
7.54 /
7.55
7.60 /
7.33
7.82 /
7.37
7.43 /
7.13
25.0 /
24.9
25.0 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.8
24.8 /
24.7
24.8 /
25.0
24.9 /
24.9
25.2 /
25.0
0
7.01- /
7.50
7.36 /
7.49
7.36 /
7.46
7.38 /
7.43
7.18 /
7.44
7.15 /
7.46
7.20 /
7.25
8.31 /
7.05
7.66 /
7.09
7.52 /
7.06
7.71 /
.7.40
7.61 /
7.50
7.93 /
7.22
7.38 /
6.89
24.5 /
24.9
25.0 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.8
24.8 /
24.7
24.9 /
25.0
24.9 /
24.9
25.2 /
25.0
1
2
9/22/2008
9/23/2008
9/25/2008
24.9
24.0
24.1
90
88
84
35
34
30
414
418
424
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
.0.9
1.5
282
50
60
205
283
284
60
66
58
58
255
248
285
63
57
252
Survival Growth
Normal
Hom. Var. i,....i
NOEC 100
LOEC >100 >100
ChV >100 >100
Method Steel's Dunnet's
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 9/22/08
Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
Overall Result
ChV
>100
Stats
Conc.
10.2
20.5
41
82
Survival
Critical Calculated
10 18
10 '18
10 18
10 18 •
Growth
Critical Calculated
2:41 -0.3466
2.41 2.8031
2.41 1.0851
2.41-0.1582
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04
100
10 18
2.41-0.2261

z
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Facility: MOORE COUNTY WWTP
Labora Dry Performing Test: MERITECH, INC
X 11
ignature of Oprator in Re-.onsible c arge
l4 -�
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
`
NPDES#:. NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Comments: Dilution Water Batch
#673 & 674 Used
* PASSED: 3.58% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
'CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
26
24
19
19
25
26
23
22
25
22
24
24
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6
# Young Produced
24
15
18
23
23
25
19
24
26
25
24
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
D
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
pH
1st sample
Control 7.96
7.86
Treatment 2 7.50
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
7.88
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
7.74
7.72
e
n
d
7.40
7.31
1st sample
7.97
7.86
7.86
7.89
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.63
7.21
7.78
7.27
2nd sample
7.94
7.88
7.78
7.85
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
7.68
7.14
7.88
7.24
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combi
23
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 3.58
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.25
Control
8.33
Treatment 2
22.42
Treatment
2
Control CV
10.232%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/18/08
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/17/08 Sample 2: 06/19/08
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
25.0 hrs
24.0 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
1st_ P/F
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
44
187
457
456
<0.1
<0.1
1.6
0.5
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r,,,,
•
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs) :
Died from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

-Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facihity: Moore County WWTP
NPDES # NC00 37508
Date:7/2/2008
Laboratory: Mer.itech, Inc.
`•.0%^'1
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
x
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Pipe #: 001 County: Moore
Comments
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: •
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 ;Bail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
6
Test Initiation Date/Time
% Eff.
'Control I
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
10.25 I
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
I 20.5 I
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
141 1
Surviving # .
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
I 82 I
Surviving #
Original #
WI/original (mg)
100
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) 'nit/Fin
Temp (C)'nit/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) 'nit/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (`C)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
6/17/2008 / 3:00 PM
1
2
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.432
0.495 '
0.458
0.512
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
0.443
0.555
0.464
• 0.483
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.467
0.441
0.463
0.380
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.422
0.491
0.476
0.486
9
7
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.427
0.369
0.522
0.479
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.413
0.522
0.473
0.504
0
Day
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
• % Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.474 I
100.0
0.474
97.5
0.486
100.0
0.438
100.0
0.469
90.0
0.449
97.5
0.478
8.06 /
7.94
8.07 /
7.78
8.02 /
7.82
8.04 /
7.92
8.03 /
7.74
8.00 /
7.88
8.07 /
7.80
7.45 /
7.39
7.54 /
7.29
7.68 /
7.15
7.68 /
7.47
7.57 /
7.39
7.64 /
7.17
7.33 /
7.21
24.9 /
24.7
24.9 /
24.6
24.8 /
24.8
24.8 /
25.0
25.0 /
25.0
25.0 /
24.9
25.0 /
25.2
0
2
7.20 /
7.52
7.41 /
7.48
7.57 /
7.58
7.62 /
7.70
7.63 /
7.61
7.49 /
7.72
7.62 /
7.54
8.33 /
7.13
7.45 /
7.07
7.77 /
6.99
7.87 /
7.23
7.59 /
7.22
7.75 /
7.20
7.24 /
6.94
25.0 /
24.7
25.0 /
24.6
24.8 /
24.8 '
24.6 /
25.0
24.9 /
25.0
24.8 /
24.9
25.5 /
25.2
2
6/16/2008
6/17/2008
6/19/2008
23.1
25.0
24.0
84
82
78
35
46
47
478
464
460
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
2.2
1.6
0.5
252
40
53
193
253
254
38
38
56
52
184
176
255
38
53
190
Survival Growth
Normal
Hom. Var. i ...�
ii
NOEC 100 100
LOEC >100 >100
ChV >100 >100
Method Steers Dunnett's
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 6/16/08
Hatch Time: 3:00 PM CT
Overall Result
ChV
>100
Stats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
10.25 10 16 2.41-0.3653
20.5 10 18 2.41 1.1111
41 10 18
82
2.41 0.1674
10 14 2.41 0.7610
100
10 16 2.41-0.1142
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 •, Date: 03/13/08
i`aCility: MOORE COUNTY WWTP
!Laboratory Performi pg Test: MERITECH, INC
IN
Signature o. Operator in Res 50 si 1
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order:
omments: Dilutib i dLj_ E tp ;n
#664 9, 650 & 651
C3 i:.--
* PASSED: 11.03% Reduction *
41N/INIMommaa...47
MAIL ORIGINAL ':O:
North. Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
# Young Produced
Adult (L) ive (D)ea
1 ? 4 5 6
I-2-2 -25124
II t��IL IL
Effluent %: 41% .
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 '2 3 4
j# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
1stsample
s
t
a
1st sample
Control 17.60
Treatment 2 7.81
n
d
7.35
7.59
24I2°
24 19
L L
1st sample
8.10
7.95
7.92
7.91
s
t e
a n
✓ d
t
st sample
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
!Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
7.66
7.99
7.47
7.40
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
7 8 9 10 11 12
22
2]
24 22 14 25
L ;L
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
23 .?;: 20 17 22 21 0 22
L
L
L
2nd s a?: p1e
8.09 %.98
7.80 8.02
s
t e
a
✓ d
t
2nd sampl:
7.68 7.40
7.81 7.681
LC50 =
95% Con iiden e imits
% -- %
L
L
D
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 11.03
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
21.92
Control
8.33
Treatment 2
19.50
Treatment 2
Control CV
18.090%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
81.3%
PASS
FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/05/08
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/03/08 Sample 2: 03/06/08
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample
Grab !Comp. IDuration
X 123.5 hrs
X I23.8 hrs
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
Concentration
.'fortality
Method of Determinat... L I
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
2nd
ist P/F
I S S
L A A
U M M
T p p
48
188
,1
455 j472
f
<0.11
0.9
<0.1
0.5
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also I
start/end start/end
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs1
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.4')
pH
Control
High
Conc.
D.O.

x
Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Facility: Moore County WWTP
Laboratory: Meritech, Inc.
Date:3/14/2008
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
x
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Test Initiation Date/Time
Eff. Repl.
Control Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
10.25 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
20.5 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
41 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
61.5
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) 'nit/Fin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) IniUFin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Terrp. at Receipt ("C)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cml
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
3/4/2008 / 4:00 PM
1
10
10
0.531
10
1a
ri 503
10 •
10
0.528
10
10
0.498
0
8.18 / 8.06
7.35 / 7.42
25.3 / 24.9
0
7.5� 7
8.3
25�4g
10
0.583
NPDES # NC00 37508 Pipe #: 001 County: Moore
3
10
10
0.482
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
4
10
10
0.551
Comments
`ip_g/EL-W71",
31 MAR I : 1)01 �.
RY• 0'
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.453
0.552
0.616
10
10
10
10
0. 97
9
10
0.575
10
0.463
10
10
0.604
10
10
0.574
10
10
0.641
•
I
10
0.575
10
10
0.513
10
10
0.570
9
10
0.576
% Survival
• Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
I 0.537 I
I 100.0
I 0.537 I
100.0 I
0.531 I
I 100.0
I 0.516 I
I 100.0
I 0.525 I
100.0
I 0.589 I
I 95.0 I
I 0.573 I
Day
1 2 3 4 5 6
8.21 / 96 8.24 / 8.03 8.20 / 8.19 8.26 / 7.90 8.13 / 7.82 8.23 / 7.99
7.82 / ' i 95 7.58 / 7.32 7.81 / 7.69 7.80 / 7.07 7.80 / 6.83 7.78 / 7.38
24.9 / : 5.0 25.0 / 25.0 24.9 / 24.9 24.8 / 24.5 24.5 / 24.9 24.8 / 25.1
1 2 3 4 5 6
7.82 / .' 76 7.50 / 7.62 7.65 / 7.92 7.89 / 7.70 7.65 / 7.62 7.58 / 7.72
7.69 6.70 7.98 / 7.03 7.85 / 7.60 7.69 / 6.84 7.65 / 6.59 7.79 / 7.10
25.1 ; 25.0 24.9 / 25.0 24.9 / 24.9 24.8 / 24.5 24.5 / 24.9 24.9 / 25.1
1 _ 2 3
3/3/2008 3 /2008
23.9
95
42
220
48
69
23.5
98
48
453
<0.1
0.5
461
<0.1
0.5
222
42
60
208
3/6/2008
23.8
104
45
484
<0.1
0.9
Normal
Horn. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
Stats
Conc.
10.25
Survival Growth
11-1
I,....I LEI
82 82
>82 >82
>82 >82
Steel's Dunnett's
Survival
Critical Calculated
10 18
20.5 10
41 10
61.5 10
18
18
18
Test Organisms
i1
Cultured In-Hous
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 3/3/08
Hatch Time: 3:00 PM CT
Overall Result
ChV
>82
Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41 0.1517
2.41 0.5542
2.41 0.3101
2.41-1.3261
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
82 10
14
2.41-0.9435

.- . Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
I Facility: MOORE COUNTY WWTP
NPDES#:
Laboratory Performidg Test: MERITECH,
INC
nature of Operator ine-zsponsible Charge
x ,
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 dLinbr
Comments: dilutig:wate•r-la teh-4--
631 and 632 used for this test.
* PASSED: 3.83% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Young Produced 24 24 24 24 26 26 26 24 11 26 26 24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead ilL L L L L L L L L L L L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12
4 Young Produced
23
26
24
25
11
23
23
21
25
26
25
24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
PH
Control
Treatment 2
D .0 .
Control
Treatment 2
st Gample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.95
7.80
8.00
7.96
e
a
r d
t
1st sample
8.09
8.21
7.80
7.66
I7.94 8.85
7.76 7.93
t e
a
r d
t
1st sample
8.20
8.30
7.48
7.37
7.98
7.89
8.01
8.05
t e
a
r d
t
2nd sample
7.65
7.70
7.601
7.55
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 3.83
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.92
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
23.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
17.869%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/05/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/03/07 Sample 2: 12/06/07
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 22.7 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 23.3 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1) 46
Spec. Cond.(pmhos) 171 438 462
Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
Sample temp. at receipt('C) 1.7 0.7
replicates)
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
%
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber -- Other --
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
Conc.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
pH
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
tart/end

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Facility: MOORE COUNTY WWTP
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#:
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC
signature of Operator in Response
Signature
of Laboratory Supervisor
e Charge
matzum.1
2119F6���E
Comments: *DOutioer Batch
#614 & 615 Used*
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
* PASSED: 4.83% Reduction *
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
22
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
26
19
24
22
22
20
23
24
22
22
23
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
20
22
21
20
22
26
24
16
2'0
20
24
pH
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.95
7.88
7.93
8.12
s
t e
a
r d
1st sample
7.80
8.08
7.35
7.50
8.09
7.89
8.05
8.08
8.03
7.97
7.99
7.96
s s
t e t e
a n a n
✓ d r d.
t t
1st sample 2nd sample
7.76
7.66
7.65
7.63
8.03
7.82
7.63
7.62
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
%
%
%
as %,
%
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.189
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 4.83
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.42
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
21.33
Treatment 2
Control CV
8.172%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS
FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/12/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/10/07 Sample 2: 09/13/07
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample
Grab
Comp.
Duration
X 23.7 hrs
X 24.2 hrs
1st
D
I S
L A
U M
T p
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
40
164
478
504
<0.1
<0.1
1.4
0.8
combining replicates)
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% --
%
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
High
Conc.
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form
Facility: MOORE COUNTY WWTP
Laboratory Perfaxming Test: MERITECH, INC
{�// 1J.
Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#:
f L�
«S1gnature o 'Operator . 3 Responsible
/ -mot-. 1
/ "7.% ��
Signature Z/ ���
I
,. 9 of Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order:
Charge
Comments:
Date:
06/28/07
tcett
BY•
* PASSED: 18.1%s Reduction *
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
20
22
24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L
23
21
22
22
21
24
26
22
23
L L L L L L L L L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
20
21
18
19
18
19
12
20
22
11
20
pH
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
8.06
7.95
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
7.90
7.95
7.63
7.60
e
n
d
7.60
7.68
1st sample
7.94
7.91
8.07
7.92
2nd sample
8.03
8.10
7.86
7.93
s s
t e t e
a n a n
r d r d
t t
1st sample 2nd sample
7.80
7.45
8.04
7.36
7.75
7.42
7.70
7.33
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as %,
%
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 18.15
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.50
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
18.42
Treatment 2
Control CV
7.216%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/13/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/11/07 Sample 2: 06/14/07
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
X 22.4 hrs
X 24.1 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
46
185
453
473
<0.1
<0.1
1.0
0.4
combining replicates)
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
• o --
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
Control
start/end
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
High
Conc.
D.O.

r'
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report\Phas
Vi
hnia
signature of O.R.C.
Facility Moore County WWTP
Laboriltoty Performing Test Research
(L! 1.
L X
NPDES#NC 0037508
ialytic
Inc.
S. naturo'of Lab SupGvisor
Sample Information
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite
(Duration)
Hardness (mg/1)
Spec.Cond. (;.mhos/cot)
Chlorine (mg/L)
Sample temp. at receipt
Sample 1
04/09/07
23.6 hrs
:42 id''
342
0.02
Sample 2
04/12/07
24 hrs.
406
0.11
rlr;
Control
49
182
2.6'C
2.7"C
Control
Effluent %
110.25
Effluent % •
20.5
Effluent %
41
Effluent "4
Effluent %
100
Young
Adult
22
Organism#
2 3 4 5 6 7
24 23 22
(L)ivc (D)cad L L L L
I
2
20 23
L L
23
I_
Pipe#
001
CountyR ? 6MoWW
Comments:
Final Effluent
Y:
1C25 = 93.16
587044/587438
Test
Information•
Treatment
pH initial
pH Final
D.0. Initial
D.O. Final
letup. Initial
Temp. Final
Start Datc
(14/ 1 1 /07
Start
100%
7.26
7.38
8.6
8.3
Renew 1
End Date
04/18/07
Renew 2
Start
Start Time
2:12 PM
Renew 1
End Time
1 1:29 AM
Renew 2
100%
7.27
7.36
8.5
8.3
100%
7.53
7.44
8.6
8.4
Control
6.91
7.00
8.6
8.2
Control
6.92
7.04
8.6
8.4
Control
6.92
7.01
8.6
8.4
24.7
24.8
24.7
24.3
24.4
24.3
24.3
24.8
25.1
24.3
24.8
25.1
8 9 10 11 12
21
L
22
24
L
# Young
22
23
21
22
24
ll
20
'
23
a
24
v
23
10
. 21
I
Adult
(L)ive (D)cad
LLLLL
L
L
L
L
L
3
4
5
6
7
# Young
20
23
19
23 20 22
21
22
19
23
21.2
Adult
(L)ivc (D)cad
LLLLL
L
L
L
L.
L
% Rcd
5.36
•
# Young •
20
19
-
21
24
-'
20
„
21
19
a
20
v
23
I
21
Mean
20.8
Adult
(L)ivc (D)cad
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
f.
L
% Rcd •
7.14
11Youne.
19
22
20
21
-
21
L
20
19
n
20
.r
IR
iu
19
Mean
19.9
Adult
(L)ivc (D)cad
I_
L
L
L
1_
L
L
L
L
L
% Rcd
11.2
-
/ a v 10 Mean
# Young
13
15
14
19
13
17
16
14
13
15
14.9
Adult
% Red
(l.)ivc (D)cad
L
L
83.5
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
12
Mean
22.4
Mean
22.3
% Rcd t
0.45
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality %
"%" Control 3rd Brood
Control Repro CV
0
100
48 Hour Mortality
Control I WC
5.65
Fiinal Mortality Significant 0>
or
No Conc.
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC = 41 % NOEC = 20.5 %
Method: Dunnett's T-test
Normal Distrib? yes Method: Kolmogorov
Statistic: 0.917 Critical: 1.035
Equal Variances? yes Method: liartlett's
Statistic: 3.149 Critical: 11.07
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable):
Method:
Effluent% Rank Sum
Critical Sum
Overall Analysis:
Result = PASSIFAIL or
Test LOEC= 100 %:
Chronic Value=
NOEC= 82 "/"
90.55
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. Of Water Quality
MAIL N.c. DENR
TO: 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
* Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 nig/I
I% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
Copy DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

. o larDE; vent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase II Chronic Cerd?Iy)J : 2001
l( NPDES#: NCo�cl ; 7..> c��l, Pipe# oc i County /'�`�C(BI - }------
Laboratory Performing Test 141C,'. ill c Li _T- k i c ..
X /j / Comments,S� �y1\ Sl�vr trc,,1►-'
Signature of R.C./L:�-F'P�, •
Signature of Lab Supervisor
Sample Information
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite
(Duration)
Hardness(mg/I
Spec.Cond.(pmhos/cm
Chlorine(mg/I
Sample temp. at receip
Control
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
)CO
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
20
I%
2
21 I2o!al!21
L L L L
L L L L
2 3 4 5
1(0
L
I8
11
L
Organism#
5 6 7 8
20
23
21
19
LILIL.
CarittAtrech.211 1-nA > ?0 °
Test
Information'
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
de), Gwnr,
Start Date End Date Start Time End Time
14/I I/pq 41/'$/off 1 I I: 30ant 9 :20/"
Start
I oo °re
'1.8�
S.os
11.63
25.0
24.9
9 10 11 12
22
L
2.l
Renewl
1 co
7.90
a.o'l
8. Ka
S. 02
25.0
25.1
Mean
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
8
8
19
18
12,
L-I'LI LII-I L.I L
1 2
3, 4 5 '6 7 '8 9 10
IL AiI �.
116118 ,R' 20118119 11(111120
6
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
1 2
3 4 5
I4I2o119
L L L
1 2 3
22
4 5
1(0
I
7 8 9 10
8 21 22
LL L L
6 7
19
I8
/5
8 910
Ia
L
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1'T 121) I2D /7 / 6 20 21 22. 1 c1 121
LLL LL LLLLL
LL �. L
L
L L L. L
L
L
L- L
i
Mean
% Red
14.4
Mean
% Red
Mean
Mean
19.3
% Red
7.7
Renew2
100
r1.98
8./5
9,91
24.8
2L1,9
Start
Control
7.qc,
'1.97
'1. IoS
2S./
24.61
Renewl
Control
8.(x)
1.96
B. co
'1.83
25, o
25.1
Renew
Control
r1.9`1
rl. 80
2S, 0
249
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality °) C
% Control 3rd Broo I!.(.'
Control Repro C, Z 7
48 Hour Mortality
Control IWC
!_2_of -ft
Significant?n
Final Mortality Significant
orl N'1/4( 'nc.
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. OECh>!CC'%• NOEC= ICC
Metho Y- e, rrt�i r✓ teSt.
Normal Distrib? Method:_l.ol,,,,,r••.;
Critical:_ 1
Equal Variances?Method:f:_rtlaT_
Statistic: 7.`4E,_ Critical: t S .c1_
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable):
Method:_
Effluent % Rank Sum Critical Sum
Overall Analysis:
Result = PASS/FAIL or
Test LOEC= ',too %; NOEC=_!04:' %
Chronic Value= ? Icp %
MAIL
TO:
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
'Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

Effluent Toxicity Repor
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test:
X
'r9 rT� - ../ii.•
erator
.i
- Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
t
/07
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
A LABORATORIES, INC.
esponsi
oratory Supervisor
Work Order: 585036/58545
C arge
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6
# Young Produced
7 8 9 10 11 12
11111111111111111111
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
21 25 22 23 21
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
6.94
7.01
7.00
7.12
s s
t e
t t e t
a n a n a
r d r d
r
t
t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd
8.5
8.4
8.4
8.3
6.94 7.03I
17.04 7.11111
e
n
d
sample
8.6 8.4
8.6 8.4
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as
%, combining replicates)
LC50 =
95% Con i ence Limits
Comments:
iil Fr_. rTtrt,n
anal EffluentL II�
4 h1AK 2007
* PASSE7Y5
'l p
Reductzron
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.435
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 1.09
9 10 11 12
L L
% Mortality
0.00
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
6.017% PASS
control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
Avg.Reprod.
22.92
Control
22.67
Treatment 2
X
Check One
FAIL
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date:.03/14/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/12/07 Sample 2: 03/15/07
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
22.4 hrs
23.6 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
1st P/F
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)I 47I I
Spec. Cond.(µmhos) 182 374 436
Chlorine(mg/1) 0.06 0.02
Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 2.5 4.0
Concentration
Mortality
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
1
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
i
Control
pH
High
Conc.
D.O.
na re o L

Effluent Toxicity Report Form
Chronic Pass/Fail
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH
X i!‘..,.. Z-t y
$6.gnature of Operator in Res nsible; Charge
X
Signature of Labo(atory Supervisor
and Acute LC50
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#:
Comments:
pTMEE
clqytx� r� 2OnlON
Y:
Work Order:
* PASSED: 2.12% Reduction *
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
22
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
21
24
21
24
24
26
26
24
23
25
23
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
25
21
19
22
30
22
27
24
21
18
22
26
pH
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
7.97
7.84
7.89
7.97
s
a
r
1st sample
8.13
8.27
e
n
d
7.89
7.99
1st sample
7.95 8.02
7.94 8.10
s
t e
a n
r d
t
1st sample
8.10
7.90
8.35
8.05
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %,
2nd sample
8.01
8.03
7.94
8.04
s
t e
a n
r d
t
2nd sample
8.06 7.65
8.23 7.53
combining replicates)
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample
L.
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.452
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 2.12
% Mortality
0.00
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
Avg.Reprod.
23.58
Control
23.08
Treatment 2
Control CV
7.109%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS
X
Check One
FAIL
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/14/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/14/07 Sample 2: 03/21/07
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
1 S S
X 22.4 hrs L A A
X 23.6 hrs
U M M
T p p
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
42
176
372
432
<0.1
<0.1
1.1
0.5
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Control
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
High
Conc.
it
D.O.

Hardness(mg/I
Effluent Aquatic Toxic!
Facility NPDES#: NCO L37S US* Pipe#66 1 County
Laboratory Performing Test /11 1 e_Ar) fi-C.J,
x
CDC
X
Signature of O.R.C.
Signature of Lab Supervisor
Sample Information
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite
(Duration)
I
Spec.Cond.(pmhos/cm
Chlori'ne(mg/I
Sample temp. at receip
rarsatx« c::.r:.:r ng 011,;7..
y6MEM
. �^C
�3
Control
Control
Effluent%
I ei ci
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)
ive (D)ead
Effluent% # Young
Adult
I (L)ive
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
(D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
MAIL
TO:
1
MCMIEWM
Comments t r,.
fy din t �.i•, '�� � ,1 ) �
D.•.S— ' Twit` ��t�tmf,a,
t.J' ; An;4
Test Start Date End Date Start Time End Time
Information'
Start
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
;co°
799
RenewljRenew2 Start jRenewl
(Do 1Uv
Control
�,. 07
IS. i 7l ..79
Control
79 4/
Control
D.C. Inftiab7( i ��✓ J { 3I �Cr 1.51 ( 3,)
D.O. Final 111111 VVV Y 1 `J „9'/1
7T
.zS:o
7,90
Organism#
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
IAD )9
t- L L L.
u21)
I9
L
le
1
L
2,3
L
L.
2 3
,RD
L
2 3
L
4 5 6
,9;L3Jit/ IA I i7I.2O
L L__
L.
L L
L L
D L L L L L
4 5 6 7
L. L.
L (.. L L .
4
5
6
L_
8
7 8.
I
19 )D i)n
L IL L L L--
1 2 3 4 5
L
1q / IN 15 1% )
L �- L L L L L-
1 2 3 4 5. 6 7 8
tv
LJ�l�lL-IL
/V
L
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
7
L
Ye II Chroni
,ts.o
10 11 12 Mean
9 10
9 10
L. I�-
9 10
L-- I L
%1
L
Mean
Mean
111
Red
3703
7, CC- 79), 793.
.S; i I2)
2670
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality
% Control 3rd Broo
Control Repro C
0
9.!
48 Hour Mortality .
Control IWC
I--°f 2
Significant?
I_c_of 1 n l
Final Mortality Significant
I %I
or
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC=. R %; NOEC=_ // %
Method:pmnrrz_sa-ye`.
Normal Distrib? '/e" Method:
Statistic:&: Critical:_
Equal Variances,?, �� Method:„_„
Statistic:_)9-
Non-Parametric
Method:
Effluent %
Rank Sum
Critical Sum
Overall Analysis: 0
Result = PASS/FAIL or
Test LOEC= o, %; NOEC=_ YI o/
Chronic Value=p/o
'Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
f% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

C P�
Facility
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia
o0rt CoLt
Laboratory Performing TesL
. Signature of O.R.C.
Sample Information
NPDES#: NC
%!- / •
Signature of Lab Supervisor
Sample 1 Sample 2 Control
Collection Star; Date
I- 22-o7 l /- 25-0'j
MrGrab
u
(Duration) I 23.ri
Harriness(mn/I1" ".
Spec. rCond. (u mhos/cm
Chlorine(mg/I
Sample temp. at receip
Control
Effluent% #Young
/23124 121 122124122.12_1
10.25 I I(L )ive (D)ead Adult I (_ L L L L I L L
Effluent%I # Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
Effluent%
# Young
Organism#
! 2 4 5 6 7
8 G 10 11 12
Pipe# L171 County (1� Q
Test
Information'
# Young J/228 a 210 2fd 22 2L1 L,f /z2o I
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead L L. L L L L. L L + L I I
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 •11 12
22 I 2q120
Start Date End Date Start Time
I Start`1 Dri !4t,�o7 /2:30pn,
RenewifriertFw2,
Treatment I 1005'1 1000/1 ) colControlI Control Control
_t
t'i iiiiiiai 7I.9,3 r7.88 rt.83 tS.lo i8.07is. o1 1
I pH Final/ 8, 0,i 18. 03 J
8 01 J
8. 1( I B, oz. 1g, co J
I 0.0. initial' B.211 I8.5'% i 8, 20 18. I
1
� L4_39J
— D.C. Final 8.Li i 18.35 1 e.52I8.4, i8.50 IA.42I
'temp. Initial 25.01 241 8 2gf 8 125.0 7
Temp. Final 25.0 25.0 2
,i 4 Its. 012s o 1,1,
l I 10 Mean
123/22j�o/joj,;�1221137_�
1LIL IL ILL LILiLILIL ►`?R5.
e, 9 i nMeanittLi/9 I /9 i /2i/8 12o I /q 18
Adult I (L )ive (D)ead I I/ 11 ILI L I L I L I'Ll i I L, L
Effluent% I # Young
Effluent%
11001
Adult
L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1(0 I 1q I Ig le 1r, if 20 18 I/3 1/8
L L/ L 1_ L L L c_ L
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Mean
Mean
End Time
:30A
Start
Renew ilriel"ICWp
1 Chronic Test Results I
Mean Final Control Ivioriality % 0
. •:rs6
% Control 3rd Broo
Control Repro C\ '7,z/
48 Hour Mortality
Control I IWC
�— L:-of
YIQP
Final Mortality Sernifi .n
Or
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC='t) _%; NOEC=,?jS%
Method:_-. btvr S_ <}-r--
Normal Distrib? _h!:; Method:f;1n':r� r_v_
Statistic: r 4C_7124__ Critical: _ _ .5
Equal Variances?
Statistic:.._. 7y
Non -Parametric Analysis ;if applicable):
Method:
Effluent % Rank Sum Critical Sum
Overall Analysis:
Result = PASS/FAIL or
Test LOEC=1L__%°; NOEC= "'4 %
Chronic Value= ., 1_L. %
MAIL
TO:
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
'Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O >5.0 mg/I
7% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 12/21/06
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
'/ .
Signature Operat . ii Responsible Charge LI
IAN 0 , 20117 _
Signature �tl�J !')05) Yr:
g of Laboratory Supervisor J __ q)
Comments:
ELZEITWET
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
17
22
22
18
22
22
20
20
18
26
22
20
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
12
10
20
19
15
22
12
14
17
14
17
16
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 4.080
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 24.50
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
20.75
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
15.67
Treatment 2
Control CV
11.827%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.05
8.02
7.92
7.94
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
8.24
7.90
8.28
7.84
8.04
8.01
7.92
8.04
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
8.10
7.87
8.20
7.66
8.00
8.15
7.99
8.0'5
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
7.90
7.68
7.92
7.75
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %,
combinin
repli
PASS FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/13/06
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/11/06 Sample 2: 12/14/06
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24.1 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
42
171
438
443
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
0.2
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% --
s
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
Control
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

• Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#:
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
x ��,.4� cC Comments:
ignature of Operato ixl R sponsible Charge
X
Signature of Laboratory ^Supervisor
Date: 09/20/06
County: ROBESON
* PASSED: -10.61% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
# Young Produced
21
22
23
24
21
24
21
22
22
20
22
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
22
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
if Young Produced
20
19
27
25
28
20
30
20
23
25
27
28
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -2.017
Tabular t = 2.650
% Reduction = -10.61
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.00
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
24.33
Treatment 2
Control CV
5.482%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.0.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.96
7.94
7.82
8.10
s
t e
a n
✓ d
t
1st sample
8.10
7.47
8.33
7.37
8.05
7.88
8.05
8.00
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.65
7.63
7.77
7.68
7.97
7.91
7.94
8.07
s
t
a
r
2nd sample
e
n
d
7.85
7.62
7.89
7.43
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as %,
combinin
PASS FAI
Check -One
Complete This For -Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/13/06
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/11/06 Sample 2: 09/14/06
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 25.3 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Sample
replicates)
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
o
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
46
168
431
470
<0.1
<0.1
1.2
0.8
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
rnnr
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

t,
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia
Facility
Laboratory Performing Test
x.l t L L ( .�
Signature of O.R.C.
�—c'--+-1 NPDES#: NC al.))) /T e; Pipe#cr•,. j County
�i1Le.c• . �'e �4� j r
Signature of Lab Supervisor
Sample Information
Sample 1
INIFINI-
Sample 2
Control
Collection.Start Date
Grab
. Composite
(Duration)
Hardness(mg/1
Spec.Cond.(pmhos/cm:
Chlorine(mg/I
Sample temp. at receip
1.
•wv•i+ RT
�7
,2,
"`''':; _ :--::'.!
L:ClIdA:1".w3M1wz:vi
1.1 t .
IG..,,., i`.i,.J,tn:.-4
. i./,.s it
/ 7>
4. 01 i
< a. j
L' '
I c
Control
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
yj
Effluent%
ci
• Effluent%
/00
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
1
L
1
L
1
�•S
Organism#
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
24,
L
2
L-
1_.
3
L
1..?
�f 1
L_
L-
L�
L—
c.c:E.
Comments
Test
Information*
Treatment
Start Date
s '& 4i.•
Start
7
Renewl
End Date
Renew2
Start Time
114/S9?t,
Start
1°fo
CIC.
i(•(
Control
Renew
End Time
`l :I1'6,1
1Renew2
Control
Control
pH Initial .7 7s-
pH FinalriA 5- S. ly
D.O. Initial' R,C;j.
D.O. Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
7.G:7
)i57L
•I r
-7s
=7. c P
7.qc
SCSI
a ,1 t1
1„c
7,0
7.7C
.2571)
)6. t
9 10 11 12 Mean
.aC
L.
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
L_
1
2 3 4 5
I2S
23
L
L-
�. . L
L
L
IL
L
6 7 8 9 10
L.
L-
�7
L
1S_
L
3U
L
Mean
Red
i-�
# Young
,),c_1
--
1L
-r
i—
v
1
. �I i1
1
)L
u
:Z-
12/4
I tJ
) c)
mnd,.
2.)
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L.. L.
,2�
L_.
L
L
L
L
L1 L.
L
%Red
i0.'
1
•
�
..
-,
v
v
1
J
.7
11
memo
# Young
.riS
17
)L)
:'.�,t
..-zO
.?
D%Red
21;>
Adult
(L)ive D)ead
L
L_
j,.
L..
L_.
L
L-
L.
L_
L.:. /
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
'•�` .tom!
L
L
In
)
I S.
L
L
L
Mean
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality %
% Control 3rd Brood
I�
Control Repro CV
48 Hour Mortality
Control • IWC
Significant?
Final Mortality Si nificant
or: No C� )
of 11)
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC = C'%; NOEC=JC 'L' %
Method:
Normal Distrib? A. ' Method:(!' t?49-
Statistic:_.h_ f Critical:_
Equal Variapces? f .$? Method = •
Statistic _C_r5'b Critical:_C.`
Non -Parametric Analysis (if R
Method:: �)�'•''elle1
Effluent % RanKSum
311
_.�yViz_
a plicable):
Critical Sum
Overall Analysis:
Result = PASS/FAIL or
Test LOEC 1'
Chronic Value= >jt-t) %
MAIL
TO:
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div: of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
'Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

4 ..
PY
Laboratory Performing Test
x / (. -i
---Signature of O.R.C. /
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase II Chronic Ceriodaphnia
Facility Je. NPDES#: NC00.3.)S`CGf;'
V ter .%zcfit r:
tc.
x / /�7,7
Signature of Lab Supervisor
Sample Information
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite
(Duration)
Hardness(mg/I
Spec.Cond.(pmhos/cm
Chlorine(mg/I
Sample temp. at receip
Control
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
I0C,I.
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
1 2
22- ?A,:
3
Organism#
4 5 6 7 8
7 / ?
•
Pipe# oaf County
Comments
Test Start Date End Date Start Time End Time
Information' 746 �� 1 5� I I
c(<llll c.,- It tl:�
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
Start
Renewl
Renewl
Start
Renewl
1Ua
ya.•,-;
efQ
zc: _y
Control
Control
Renewl
Control
77?
FOL..
�).YS
mod'.I2-
7:b'5
7,rl?
p.c.'
7, 45
CSC`
j`iL
7.St-
;r-ti-
oaf
"l,Sel
7.e1
7 7/
t,
7 !'
2
z5`C
;..i:
;U
zS:C
2 j'@
9
10
2-2
11 12 Mean
INNI
7-5 t,
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
1
21
L
L
L
L.
L
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
2.7
L.
1 2
S"
2Lf
Z'r_
L
22
L
Z(1
3 4 5
Za
zL
L
2i
LJILIL
6 7
ZV
L�
8 9 10
L4
1C
2N
Mean
1,
L
2
t)
L-
D
()
i_
% Red
�, L.
8
# Young
(
(i
C�
k-)
L)
--
(-)
.
(_-)
Ca
0
9
0
10
0
Mean
.111111,
0
(L)ive (D)ead
I7
i7
00
1'
1)
100
01
i .
# Young
0
—
C)
1..3`
-
0
(7_)
u
(1-)
r
i=
Q
J
i
0
1 U Mean
Ci
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead I
0I
r)
f)
0
0
• {1
1 • � Rea
it `t)
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
2 3 4 5
7
8
9 10 Mean
D
% Red
/
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality %
% Control 3rd Brooc
Control Repro CV
0
/,_ C.
q. z
48 Hour Mortality
. Control IWC
C of iU
Significant
of 1(--I
- Final Mortality Significant @
or' No Conc.
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC= : t;•4 %; NOEC= /r%'25 %
Method: 5iee_1's
Normal Distrib? yG s Met-Ftod:_g,tncr n.Y
Statistic: G_E-.5 7 _ Critical: i
Equal Variances? Ax Method:fz_ /e_ ,
Statistic: z 1 Critical: IL / u
Non -Parametric Analysis (if a Iicable
Method: '5 to els iUa., - -
Effluent % Rank Su Critical Sum
to. L cii.o 7 y_0
1 t.0
Overall. Analysis:
Result = PASS/FAIL or
Test LOEC=w",'7_%; NOEC= 10 Ste%
Chronic Value= LY.: %
MAIL
TO:
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
'Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Moan
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

•
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP
NPDES#:
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
X` 7 1 i t t;,
.Signature of operator th Responsible Charge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order:
Date: 06/21/06
NC0037508 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
1 2
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chronic Test Results.
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 60.84
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
20
22
21
22
19
24
26
23
21
22
19
24
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
pH
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Control
'Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
7
13
5
3
2
13
13
12
13
8
11
3
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.98_
7.79
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
_8.01
8.10
7.80
8.20
e
n
d
7.72
7.90
8.10
8.12
8.00
8.18
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.93
7.72
8.30
7.62
8.17
8.08
8.07
8.01
s
t e
a n
r d
t
2nd sample
7.80
7.50
8.05
7.48
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as %,
combining replicates
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
21.92
Control
100.00
Treatment 2
8.58
Treatment 2
Control CV
9.622%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/14/06
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/12/06 Sample 2: 06/15/06
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
X 24.2 hrs
X 24 hrs
D
I
L
T
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
177
402
333
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
0.3
%
%
%
%
$
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
-- $
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
•
Control
High
rnnn
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 .(DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Date: 03/29/06
7.86
7.90
e
n
d
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
%
%
Eff•
luent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
-, 7
X v`.;. , L
Signature Operator g
inrResponsi e C ar e
r"")...
X
Signature o Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order:
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Comments:
* PASSED: 6.06% Reduction *
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
27 27 25 28 30 27 29 28 32 26 25 26
LLLLLLLLLLLL
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
pH
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
23
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
24
26
30
27
25
31
22
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.01
7.85
7.95
7.83
7.91
7.85
s s
t e t e
a n a n
r d r d
t t
st sample 1st sample
7.85 8.08
7.80 7.70
8.05
7.68
8.47
7.80
7.90
7.80
s
t
a
•r
t
2nd sample
8.09
8.40
7.52
7.48
15
30
29
28
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.168
Tabular t = 2.508'
% Reduction = 6.06
% Mortality
0.00
Control
8.33
Treatment 2
Control CV
7.517%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
Avg.Reprod.
27.50
Control
25.83
Treatment 2
PASS FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/22/06
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/20/06 Sample 2: 03/23/06
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
Grab Comp. Duration D 1st P/F
Sample Sam 1 I S S
P X 24.4 hrs L A A
Sample 2 U M M
P X 24.6 hrs T P p
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
Sample
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Con i Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
IOrganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
46
170
470
<0.4
0.1
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Duration (hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
pH
Control
High
Conc.
D.O.
493
<0.1
0.3

Efyfluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 12/28/05
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
' �.
X /`11. •--1 : -,, L.-V.) </L.
Signature of Op9rator i�r�2esponsible Charge
ISignature of Lab.Ib ate ory Supervisor
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments:
* PASSED: 4.93% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality •
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.046
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 4.93
# Young Produced
18
17
19
15
17
15
19
17
16
16
18
16
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L•
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6
# Young Produced
19
15
12
15
17
18
17
20
14
13
Adult (L) ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L.
•
L
L
pH
Control
Treatment. 2
D.G.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.97
7.60
7.95
7.82
s
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.54
7.86
7.40
7.38
8.03
8.01
7.85
7.80
s
t e
a n
r d
1st sample
7.46
7.40
8.11
7.20
7.98
7.93
7.83
7.6.9
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
7.65
7.34
7.78
7.18
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as %,
combinin
rep1
17
16
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
16.92
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
16.08
Treatment 2
Control CV
8.151%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
bfood
83.3%
PASS FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/21/05
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/19/05 Sample 2: 12/22/05
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
X 24.2 hrs
X 22.8 hrs
D
I
L
T
S S
A A
M M
P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
195
386
420
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
1.5
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r-n,,,-
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

G, Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 09/28/05
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP . NPDES#:
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
X
Signature o - Operator intResponsible Charge
X
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
NC0037508 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
* PASSED: -12.74% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
20
19
21
10
18
22
18
13
15
15
20
21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
22
19
18
18
23
22
18
23
17
19'
18
22
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1.803
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -12.74
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
8.33
Control
17.67
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
19.92
Treatment
2
Control CV
20.809%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
7.83
7.85
7.23
7.81
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.35
7.33
7.96
7.27
1st sample 2nd sample
7.84
7.70
7.51
7.70
7.78
7.55
7.75
7.72
s s
t e t e
a n a n
✓ d r d
t t
1st sample 2nd sample
7.50
6.65
7.80
6.90
7.30
7.15
7.20
7.25
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/21/05
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/20/05 Sample 2: 09/22/05
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24.1 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24.0 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
180 435
440
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
0.3
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
--
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
•
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

X Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 06/30/05
Facility: MOORE CO.WWTP
Laboratory Performs Test:
x !� ti:� ,cL
WI
yS. nature or Operator
NPDES#:
MERITECH LABS, INC.
n Re bible Charge
Signature of Laboratory`upervisor
NO0037508 Pipe#:
County: ROBESON
Comments:
* PASSED: -11.90% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
20
19
18
21
22
21
18
19
22
21
25
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
18
25
27
25
28
13
25
24
20
.27
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1.713
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -11.90
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
21.00
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
23.50
Treatment
2
Control CV
12.012%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st
8.14
7.86
7.85
7.93
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
8.05
7.83
8.28
7.77
sample
8.00
7.88
7.81
7.78
s
t
a
r
t
1st
2nd sample
7.58
7.48
7.84
7.96
s
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 2nd sample
8.09
7.49
8.13
7.40
8.00
7.39
7.88
7.38
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %,
combining
replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/22/05
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/20/05 Sample 2: 06/23/05
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp._ Duration
X 24 hrs
X 24 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
1st P/F
S S
A A
M M
P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond. (,Cmhos )
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
44
162
512
510
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.1
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
Cnnn
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95•(DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
.l1�r
Date: 03/23/05
Facility: MOORE CO WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
X /%1 13. t.i." I
ignature of Opera.tD '-Responsible Charge
Signature of Labor tory Supervisor
NPDES#: NC0037508. Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments:
* PASSED: -0.35% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
18
26
23
21
23
23
25
28
23
24
28
24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
23
25
25
24
28
15
27
25
22
22
25
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.066
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -0.35
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.83
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
23.92
Treatment
2
Control CV
11.709%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.03
8.01
7.79
8.07
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.96
7.53
7.87
7.38
8.05
8.03
7.95
7.99
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
7.93
7.36
7.94
7.28
8.10
7.93
8.03
7.83
s
e t
n a
d r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
7.78
7.44
7.63
7.42
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as %,
combinin
replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/16/05
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/14/05 Sample 2: 03/17/05
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24.5 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
44
173
444
490
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
0.1
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r,-,,,,
•
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.