NC0037508_NPDES Permit Renewal_20140205

ATADEN®FRC'
_ FEB 1 1 2014
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
February 05, 2014
Attn: Larry Caddell -Chairman
Moore Co. Board of Commissioners
PO Box 905
Carthage, NC 28327
Subject: Receipt of permit renewal
Permit NC0037508
Moore County
Dear Mr. Caddell:
The NPDES Unit received your permit renewal application on February 02, 2014. A member of the
NPDES Unit will review your application. They will contact you if additional information is required to
complete your permit renewal. You should expect to receive a draft permit approximately 30-45 days
before your existing permit expires.
If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please, contact Tom
Belnick [phone].
Sincerely,
Wren Thedford
Wastewater Branch
cc: Central Files •
Fayetteville Regional Office
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]/Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet:: www.ncwater.orq
An Equal OpportunityAAffirmative Action Employer

Public Works
)4'a.ter PoOCution Control
7094 . ddor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
County of _Moore
January 27, 2014
Re: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
Mr. Matt Matthews
NC DENR/DWR/ Surface Water Protection
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Matthews:
(91o) 281-3146- Phone
[phone]- J'ax
ICE 1- 0 2 2014
F—KGEems
FRO
FEB2014
Moore County's NPDES Permit expires 'July 31, 2014. In compliance with Federal (40
CFR 122) and State (15A NCAC 2H.0105 (e)) regulations, we are required to submit a
Permit Renewal Application at least 180 days prior to the expiration date. The Permit
Renewal Application is enclosed, in triplicate, with correspondence.
The County of Moore requests that their existing Permit be renewed at the 10MGD
effluent limits and requirements. Construction at the facility is complete at this time.
The following are changes made at the facility since the last issuance of the permit:
1. A third train was added to the plant including a new primary clarifier,
intermediate clarifier, final clarifier, and two new basins at both first and
second stage aeration tanks.
2. Sand filters were added prior to UV.
3. UV disinfection was installed and chlorination/dechlorination systems were
removed from operation.
4. New generators were installed; three total.
5. A second primary digester was constructed.
6. Sludge presses were added for thickening and dewatering purposes; two total.
7. Drying beds are used for stockpile only at this time.
All effluent testing concentrations were calculated from 2013 lab data. All toxicity data is
included for the years of 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 and PPA results for four scans for
the same years.
Also included are the upstream low level mercury (1631) results for twelve months
required on the current NPDES permit.

Public -Works
Water Pollution ControCP(ant
1094 .Addor Road
.Aberdeen, NC 28315
County of .Moore
(9io) 281-3146- Phone
[phone]- fax
If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to contact me at (910) 281-
3146.
Sincerely,
George R. Yankay, System Superintendent
GRY/j is
Enclosures
Cc: Ms. Belinda Henson, Fayetteville Regional Office, Director
Mr. J. Wayne Vest, County of Moore, Manager
Mr. Randy Gould, County of Moore, Public Utilities Director

PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
FAc.ILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
FORM
2A
NPDES
Form 2A has'_been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basle Apj
and a "Supplemental Application; Information'•' packet The Basic Application l
into two parts All applicants must complete Parts A and C Applicants with a
equal to 01 mgd must also complete Part B Some applicants must also comp
" plication Information packet The following items explain which parts of Fo
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions 6.1 through 6.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to lmgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or -
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SlUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLAwastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SlUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Watery Pollution Control, NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
.Cea .B t 4 �.. 4!"'F 'J� L - R.9,
Y T i
�►I II 1 Pp 61F?P' GA 5' �.
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
•
Facility Name Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
Mailing Address 1094 Addor Road •
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Contact Person George Yankav
Title System Superintendent
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address same as above
(not P.O. Box)
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Moore County Board of Commissioners
Mailing Address PO Box 905
Carthage, NC 28327
Contact Person Larry Caddell
Title Chairman
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner 0 operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this'permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits). -
NPDES NC 0037508 PSD
UIC Other
RCRA Other
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Town of Aberdeen 6350 separate town
Town of Southem Pines 12334 separate town
Village of Pinehurst 13124 separate municipal
Town of Carthage 2205 separate town
Town of Pinebluff 1337 separate town
Town of Vass 720 separate municipal
Tourism/seasonal/resort 8000 separate town
Total population served 44070
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 2 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
® Yes ❑ No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12th month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 10 mgd
b. Annual average daily flow rate
Two Years Aqo
4.132mgd
Last Year This Year
4.193mqd 4.889mqd
c. Maximum daily flow rate 5.993mqd 8.156mqd 9.531mgd
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 100
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
1
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent 0
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
v. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? 0 Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
0
0
® No
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
mgd
❑ Yes ® No
Annual average daily volume applied to site: mgd
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works? ❑ Yes
® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control;
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
e.
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the
following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection):
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
that receives this discharge
the receiving facility. mgd
in a manner not included
❑ Yes
0 No
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method 0 continuous or 0 intermittent?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 4 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:.
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location Aberdeen 28315
(City or town, if applicable)
Moore County
(Zip Code)
North Carolina
(County) (State)
35°04'04" N 78°28'07" W
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) - ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 4.982 mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? 0 Yes ® No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Aberdeen Creek
b. Name of watershed (if known)
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced 0 Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 90
Design SS removal 90 %
Design P removal 0
Design N removal 75 %
Other i
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
UV disinfection
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? 0 Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? 0 Yes ® No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combinedsewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: 001
'6"
?._ "` '.. •
IY)vMtLi%L1i� 4
�i . �J om, 3
# �r4Q.i��ll�t
'V "1 GE D -(
ki k. 'k fi- *
{x'..z ii
Ti 34L'r-^F
�k'S h r s., ...•
alu.jyfa �'
.�` i�fi��Q
-- } +'
d'Y +-"" -
r .+ "' tea'
; , c�
� n
�. '3
pH (Minimum)
6.02
s.u.
C eF
i
i 4 „ .K
ys S
i1
pH (Maximum)
7.80
s.u..
` ,
Flow Rate
9.531.
mgd
4.889
mgd
365
Temperature (Winter)
18.1
°C
15.4
°C
181
Temperature (Summer)
24.2
°C
21.7
°C
184
For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
�#
:f ,.; t ..::a'`.r!'�r
"�+ DISCHARGE
{� S+�i€tit'-
VERA DI ILA} ISCH ►l E
,. 4E *j am
$rz. rL �t 7 3 .n. T +t<✓`...t-{
1, lc
t# E�yi
,r
Y NT... .
H 3�sst' 3'�♦<'�.+ �''i!".3.3yaC3
'�^^-,--
> -3'=
't.+T:Y'
s���`$-
- .3 �t
'�"�'
Con
' Uri ; . '
a: =s i cc-
Unit>
eta
e
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
BOD5
35.5
mg/L
5.1
mg/L
249
SM5210B
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
>900
#/100mL
5.4
#/100mL
249
SM922D
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
24
mg/L
8.2
mg/L
249
SM2540D
.• ¢.,x,y c`.-;t:�a_�},.
�
= '� y} �'"
FE 1CAlp
s sd �+§»
� ��
`.:')'as• ... �:'.a „- +�i. ''_ `� .C..N 'G ice.
�'
°ss�f�,�fat,«-�c--;ti: rx " qA` `e
sY'2 t�h `: '5.z.� i�o-�' ' �
'vim:-X
1" IOyN
.w).5'yi
F FORM
.F:'i"�`.ii�.5�'�.T?.s'+
•L y�iA - '-J "5 - 'i `k#`{'.,`3�- ,a ss„'.�,.'
GE ) T TLL� RMI HICH T R �4�T
£ r=M+ S's(-'. Y'+uk w'? gi'Y1L 4 t:.. . to -� k 3i*
2A Y®_ , T�G`O P'LE'> E�
'ri ��. �"tt ��s `� ��-7a: _.. �k 5".»�'�w s.. SG
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
AS C-APPt' ATIONLINE0 MATiIOM
q� .
.: .......e;;��i-.�i.i—,.iFi,6`...;^•i.�n'"S +-=<1-2F'` ta, r�34c''..
'per
.'.� ., �� .n ••�*u'�'° 'X6?£+z.,�.i•iii3�.1a £..iir".§v.=e,
, "e a +ate . r,ia 3- JM- "�.:- , Se. .r... '),"�' ;,, 4 'L t+Y =''S •R s??-' P-
€pw 1 I TialeA A►; F�10+„J N °�NIF4aMAT� t;7�+i Q , ►P--- L CA T 11�1((1Tkl ;Ai Ala OW t3Rl; It THA
§,, .. rn 4i fr• "S'€"�m4z . AtF + `+t' I nJP A .. f $L �.i'R �},. Q 9 Jiw`t y }'„KrS' Y*
AL,. 01 D 100 0 t0 Was ` ia �; � � .; � .
� � may: ��,�..
All applicants with a design flow rate >_ 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day
798,613 gpd
that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
2013. Rehab of 5 stations was completed in 2010. Rehab on
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
Rehab of Old Town Pinehurst sewer lines was completed in
the interceptor began January 2014. The sewer lines around Pinehurst Lake were lined- cure in place. Camp Mackall
line will be inspected in 2014.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information.
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the
backup power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the
B.4. OperationlMaintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment
area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
(You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
that are: 1) within 'A mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
is stored, treated, or disposed.
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
diagram.
and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
contractor? 0 Yes "4 No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: ( ) •
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
None
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
c. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed
applicable. For improvements
applicable. Indicate
Implementation Stage
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational
e. Have appropriate
Describe briefly:
by any compliance schedule
planned independently
dates as accurately as possible.
Level
permits/clearances conceming other
or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed
of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion
Schedule Actual Completion
MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
below, as
dates, as
0 No
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ / / /
Federal/State requirements been obtained? 0 Yes
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must
effluent testing required by the permitting authority
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be
Outfall Number: 001
ONLY).
provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide
for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include
the indicated
information
conducted
other appropriate
data must be
reported must be based on data collected through analysis
must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing
no more than four and on -half years old.
'xy TACJIYIUM
'F �iISCHARG
s.
IDAI1/EE1)`DAl
lgIGHAE
_
t
-
#a` ]
"k_ 7 "„
�„
.i+=l. �. 4�3. � L.�#*- »«
a
A#J I A>
p1):LUTi11`� -
F�''q,�YS ss. ! yx 3'
+ ' 1: 2 3 b - .. 'h
� ' V-t
3-aT— �.:�
,-�-w
3 #' M �
,
i ).���Y ��:.
a
}
i- i�5 •� "a'
4,
j �tk � : ��....
rx
-t
i
y„
�"{.may,
Ila lx =
i
f :'r�s may{.. ":
3 Y�_} ia�"�1, ,.3
L " }i' 4 I't`3 }G
x,y
� -L 3 h'4..u� "��'
..r> V�it�`�
� 'C n
. r x� � +'?ci.,ari;
� _ e '� 7S8".,�.-1a
ample{.,
ice. +:u..:^ ST'
...r.1-'a.
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
29.3
mglL
1.60
mg/L
249
SM4500NH3D
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
27.0
uglL
25.0
uglL
25
SM4500CI-G
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
11.79
mglL
8.38
mglL
365
SM45000-G
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
6.34
mglL
2.25
mg/L
13
SM450ONH3 F ,
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
19.5
mg/L
14.7
mglL
13
SM4500 NO3 E
OIL and GREASE
6.35
mg/L
2.12
mglL
3
EPA 1664
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
5.84
mg/L
3.20
mg/L
13
SM4500 PE
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
380
mglL
349
mg/L
3
SM2540C
OTHER
��ND
.n:51-'k+�s6s�.'"�':_
VON
Ei 1(IEW
a-,
O»►RT
11 ' CE
B'`�
�n" �5=� '�.�:-z
z) r0 D 'ERMIN
y
T H OTHEJ 'AR
NW'
iu',4L .,,
� �i�''z;�:.��*,�'x��r,4u2�'""�:� y.K'�Si.�x,,S,o.�t?x`"�
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 8 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
;4" �. t� `�{'._y�µ
ID4 4Y l e Kam•' ire
•
US: MAT ,--
d�+h{�.
b
y }1}:l 4 ., . 3+ ^X`ih i41i5 }a+:. `. 'nkr. h 4y�
\.J. e�4'tt.�Z- •,._.a .?S�w�`�r`:f {l :,T."'u ._ .� �; k4., •i`� ... .= .m 4�'�,`��� .. ��� :s, �•
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
® Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
0 Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
it
lGi11 QMPE 1iF�,�t�„ ,ICAO
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Larry Caddell- Chairman
Signature G4liZALIA.K.
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed 'e-24'1-01 +
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETEDFORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County.Water Pollution Control, NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
¢r.l oAPPLICAT ON INFORMATIONg
PalitT D. EXPANDED DMA � Pis
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required to
have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these_data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other
appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below any
data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant scans and
must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMITJM DAILY,DISCHARGEr,,
P.NERAGE EtAi V ISCHARGE
,s
OLLUTANT
Conc.
[
Conc.
:.
3
ir)-
umber :
-; of s �
ANALY ICAL
METHOD
M
M DLL
.,_ b.e .`1
a _..., , ._ .,:�4
_v.. .�
_
��._
Samples:
�
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE),
CYANIDE,
PHENOLS,
AND HARDNESS.
-
ANTIMONY
<0.025
mg/L
<0.025
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
ARSENIC
<0.010
mg/L
<0.010
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
BERYLLIUM
<0.001
mg/L
-"
<0.001
mg/L
3
EPA 200.7
CADMIUM
<0.002
mg/L
<0.002
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
CHROMIUM
<0.005
mg/L
<0.005
mg/L .
4
EPA 200.7
COPPER
0.017
mg/L
0.011
mg/L
4
EPA 218.2
LEAD
0.053
mg/L
0.018
" mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
MERCURY
4.63
ng/L
1.930
ng/L
12
EPA 1631
NICKEL
0.006
mg/L
0.008
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
SELENIUM
<0.010
mg/L
<0.010
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
SILVER
<0.005
mg/L
<0.005
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
THALLIUM"
<0.005
mg/L
<0.005
mg/L
3
EPA 200.7
ZINC
0.089
mg/L
0.073
mg/L
4
EPA 200.7
CYANIDE
<0.005
mg/L
<0.005
mg/L
4
SM 4500 CN E
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
0.064
mg/L
0.020
mg/L
4
EPA 420.1
HARDNESS (as ,
CaCO3) ,
121
mg/L
108
mg/L
4
SM 2340C
Use this space (or a separate sheet) o provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 10 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: 001- Results Attached (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
ivri
s i `" #
ii LIf D1SC 1 =
7 ti '
1 R%K0 �A L3 i31SCHP
'
-atAI
`s.i ---
,, r �;-,{,..
� ����
�� V� � y�
j ..=g•tiii
_
,
g�+s
Mass`^s•iz.. r€w-'='-.Y-�3t ._
_�::iy'
�` 4,
�
.} .a..
"r ..
'c'.2-.•=:GY;"1`
i€'.
^.*fF-fir.
Mc� E
.. aF�
��
Y, \F..t:'-w-r,.v�e
, +v�-1 `•�'+
a-�,. -5-"£�
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
,
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: 001- Results Attached (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
�,y:i
'Y*FF4'+�"`�r
�'li"3?mt v sry
IOC l�T Nt1'
'.'.._ Vl-
AiZ1ME�MD (L I�t 'G
�1kn, _
i GE :
t{c
;'�T'�
nERAGE AtCX
, tii'x N .�: ;^�
DISC ARCS
- l cs_z
e�'�$:
4 t^.+�„
--
7n
.{.��Se
'
,
3,
M
"3
i.-
'4, ,, -T r
k �
'T �"
c nctin�,
4 -
Hr F'
'
;{.�:•__k�,�
av p
asUtits
3�
r ?T
.�
V`
its., �
CQrt'
r'{+ .L$
t:
4 i�
tinlM
a
9
s
k - a�`!�.
=-
t
- _
'�..s
f7 U�.t
r- -
ra `��'. _'
Ff yJ* „ . " f-
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
-T .�,:[
....�,.x:t
Ev.�.i:-;
.. .�._3-,-t'
_ __:
��..x5ia�
.'"Y... _
112 .
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4, 6-D I N I T R O-O-C R ES O L
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds reques ed by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: 001-Results Attached (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
z
'MAXIMUM DAll Y p,„ „_ _GE
`x A /ERAG D 1 Y
D SGFIARG
- {
ti
h � w,;
C rfc
al
a, :
xfMass
units f
= Conc
3
1111
,,
t�n�
u
of
samples
trier
"
ANIiL' t AL
HAD
£
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL) ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
•
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13 of 22

c
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: 001-Results Attached (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.) .
- t' l
M CIII
ei.
tlI�C.DA1LV D H RG
'4, i ..;A Y fls ^.�' f
�4 �
ERAS „
.Gfh/1LiE..DACL.X
-� �az.._..trr
SCHA� q
CsSCrtIAR�i`
S a"t„sz
, c
x
-4, k
Un Is
-- -^ v.
�.
..b..r-iY
e
,, f ,
'lr� a''S-
.,Samilptf
,..�c- mow'
L.UT IT
Y =
;.- , —_ -,+ ,,. ,.,"
ti a�� �;�- A � . -. �u
:.�,• �7 T*
-._�r
- ;w.lh,'� �-
�
�.-_.Tn X�! _
,
p
S`.,.
- F
. '� F��
-
' YHIW
.-e
' �i's.-a:.
r r.:a
34;,
j+^
Conn
� .f f�+
,
Units
p -7
,-�"�
-1N+<<' 't l-..
+ �7x,
Ma
im
-i, �
3
y HOP
- . =
+f a._Y - -
r-
-
7 3 °. -.�.
id $..,
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE _
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
124
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to
provide information
on
other base -neutral compounds
requested by the permit
writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g , pesticides) requested by the permit writer
:�`.3c.-�`3'yx:�::•:
,�� �. '��'E �" .�'4
R O
vvs.cq .: ' y. :.x:vz„ a k'..� a;s 5 x.
x� �� ,', a ter• •�.. f' `"ia - . t .#�y1y+.i
TH, P A 9 o Ei I '1 E��41I E 1l H OTHE ,
z
.frtom:-ss'�.�_',�.;
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page14of22 -

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
•�}^.r
k_s 7l.. v. s�
APLGQ Q ,5e•'t.;datt>
PPLEiM .:rb7 \ '..4++?3'^ a.
. . A 1^d
H�' �y"•F.ksz'-�sn.rsJ �_ -`¢ i+YF�
3
. ..$.
gr.
•9£`3^+�,`.F"y'u�v�F,?
p� �;t�
exn �s-; R} RrLp.eNRwf@XF',+'°--vS7ef ah ''Y.e i3 ml ti3"'�'i �+"'i +7
$ix°`.9xiaYs..:k. L' y� i1lJE3'3a."�S� i'�s,"C+ �+w .�;e.� v>k' kw.�? r..+�- x �' =i�v. i � +t. F i5'�eAY.t_u �.a _..,
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent
❑ chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the
column per test (where each species
-
toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
constitutes a test). Copy this page
Test number:
if
more than three tests are being reported.
Test number.
Test number.
a. Test information. Results Attached
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution •Control,NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
"" w^ .i .:"w n,
.t,„.
;' '+4 �ji.'ti"t �y
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
LC50
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
IC25
- %
%
Control percent survival
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
/ /
/ /
/ /
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
❑ Yes ® No
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary. of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
Summary of results: (see instructions)
All results are attached.
�� Ems, *� ,`
, � �Fo-�es.e� -:ram � 'fix sr +' � w3
..E."T� Y_.�` w� ^fy`.v» ti . 4,-
A:-....»..?. "f. i.".,'?F zc ,a. G>Fe, .�«r r-^a.'#'•.^'R., .+..:^�521..;s
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
• Lumber
t-1-3- �} 'a,�''a '"
OP PMEN E R A,7 3 kit
'�tx+Y;NF'
j} ,x iF,., -- € a §'�
"-"'":._� wr
'33
! - .,[•'S"'
.
''NRE'x€`;�% 41SRD)!`s?` G+ 1r'C . G-1'^?CF RIE� %�., - .:. Y t •�F n st "'�
�.}3.: �,�?i
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 0
or other remedial wastes must
-
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
b. Number of CIUs. 3
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Erico, Inc
Mailing Address: 188 Carolina Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Electroplating. of grounding rods with copper and nickel
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Grounding Rods -
Raw material(s): Steel rod and coil
F.6. -Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
9233 gpd (100% continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits . ® Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
433- Electroplating and Metal Finishing
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or isexcepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
EFER ` EaA P GATt(� 01lERV Elit1 bAGIE. TU E 'ERMINE 11dIII� CH RS P RT
t Y `jam fi ca- '±�"i#SF 3
} t R { ,fps #4� ,t?Rt l 2�0. YO►U •
ST
t1A CpiVtPLET
.�^v:.ft .'�.. �� i �A X .�5�f :_`„ c... n..,4 _..x'Sf:.. . �...R _ _ .. ,,7. .:•v.s - � .-k+,?..;i
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
•
RIVER BASIN:
.. ,, 1aYi
�. �� `k ' �.�SYS '�f'y}y'"ai`
lPPLEME L kPPLt f `I 1 fil . I n �
_ - ms_ �..w.. _: t
_ f
�s,t ?ma`s;•- .i't u^e-s?s',P}"+°3swl:9;vv.,"S<.K.Ysa`i �. : {f "ems){ _`�'" fi„
ED' Et2 STEMS , '
z _ k ,4
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
G.1. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds,
outstanding natural resource waters).
c. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
c. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
sewer collection system that
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number -
b. Location
•
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
0 Rainfall 0 CSO pollutant concentrations 0 CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume 0 Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
G.4. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (❑ actual or 0 approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (0 actual or ❑ approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 20 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
I
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
G.S.
G.6.
c. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (0 actual or 0 approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO
intermittent shell fish bed closings; fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss,
(e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
&
.�e e 7 ti 1T
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 21 of 22

Additional information, if provided, will appear on the following pages.
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber.
ro" ' �'� y.� �.: �' � a � +, r � rx
{ '' +., F:'. ".r :e°..,i'v;s.;°. �.F d::frs51' --{'�`^'{�-�
� ^'fir •S
.42
. ; a�ti "fi ' :'y A� s tl' � a 3' _ �'' • ; ",', `a
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
•
Name: Pinnacle Furnishings, Inc
Mailing Address: 10570 NC Hwy 211 East
Aberdeen, NC 28315
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Electroplating and anodizing of aluminum metal
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Furniture for hotels, casinos and restaurants
Raw material(s): Aluminum metal
F.6. Flow Rate.
c. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1550 gpd ( continuous or 100% intermittent)
collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
_
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( - continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
433- Electroplating and Metal Finishing
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused -or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Moore County Water Pollution Control,
NC0037508
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
_. J air €N >i,
OF 't' i
h �i'Yzre �S`4 wi
dl� 1�iS �,4i: It S D + , +G S l �Gfi #1 lE� . b 5 �
� `� ,• �` .
questions F.3 through F.8 and
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Thermal Metal Treating, Inc
Mailing Address: PO Box 367
Aberdeen, NC 28315
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Electroplating and metal heat treating
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Residential and commercial door hardware, industrial tools and automotive components
Raw material(s): Brass, steel, and nickel parts
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
540 gpd ( continuous or 100% intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
433- Electroplating and Metal Finishing
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

NPDES Permit No. NC0037508
Moore County WWTP
Hereivinc Stteutru AberdeenCteak Drainage &situ bitrber River
Latitude! 35.04 ' 03"H Lmicitude: 79 28' 08"W
Sub-Baahu 03-07-50 Permitted Plow: 6.7 /10.0 MGD
State Grid USCS Quad: G 2IS W/ Nub lufgN.C. Stream Clatr: C
NPDES Permit NC0037508
Moore COunty

Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant Process Narrative
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant is an activated sludge treatment facility with two
stages of aeration and three stages of sedimentation. Anaerobic digestion is utilized to reduce the
volume of sludge. Sludge is subsequently pressed and stockpiled before disposal.
Raw sewage enters the wet well of the Raw Sewage Pump Station by gravity and is screened and
pumped to the Grit Removal Unit where grit is separated from the raw flow. The sewage then
flows to the primary clarifiers (three) from which the primary sludge flows to the digesters. Flow
then goes into the First Stage Aeration Basin where diffused aeration is employed to reduce the
BOD of the wastewater. The Intermediate Clarifiers (three) receive the flow, and the settled
sludge is returned to the aeration basin with excess going to the digester. The wastewater then
enters the Second Stage Aeration Basin where diffused aeration further reduces the BOD and
also accomplishes nitrification. The Final Clarifiers (three) then provide final sedimentation of
the activated sludge which is returned to the aeration basin with excess to the digesters. The
liquid flowing over the wier of the Final Clarifier then flows to a sand filter which further
reduces the TSS/BOD and turbidity. UV bulbs disinfect the water prior to discharge. The fmal
step in treatment is the Cascade Aerator which allows the remaining elevation to be employed to
increase the oxygen content of the treated effluent.
The primary sludge is pumped to one of two Anaerobic Digesters. The waste activated sludge
from the Intermediate Clarifiers and the Final Clarifiers is thickened prior to going into the other
Anaerobic Digester. Digested sludge from both primary digesters is sent to the Secondary
Digester for further treatment and is periodically withdrawn and pressed on a Belt Press to form
a cake. The cake is stockpiled on covered beds prior to final disposition at either a landfill or
composting facility.
The following section provides a brief description of each process unit.
Raw Sewage Pump Station
The Raw Sewage Pumping Station wet well receives the raw flow and the in -plant waste flow
through a mechanically cleaned bar screen. The purpose of these units is to remove rags, sticks,
and other debris that may, interfere with the equipment and treatment units that follow. Bar
screening is also done at the pump stations ahead of the pumps. The screenings are landfilled.
The wet well has a small volume to prevent septicity of the sewage during low flow. Four dry pit
submersible pumps take suction from the wet well and maintain the wet well level in a narrow
range as the inflow varies.
Grit Removal Unit
The effluent from the Raw Sewage Pump Station enters the parshall flume at the Grit Unit where
the total waste flow measurement is made. The dischargefrom the parshall flume is routed
through control gates to two grit chambers where sand and other heavy particulate matter settle
from the wastewater.

The settled grit is pumped from the bottom of each chamber by two grit pumps discharging into
the grit washer where the grit slurry is washed. A screw conveyor carries the grit at an incline (to
allow dewatering) to a container located outside the Grit Unit. The grit thus collected is
landfilled.
Wastewater in the Grit Unit flows over a wier into the effluent line ensuring a grit free discharge
to the Primary Clarifiers.
Primary Clarifiers
Three 75.0 ft. diameter settling tanks receive the wastewater from the Grit Unit. Settled solids
(sludge) from the clarifiers are mechanically collected for pumping to the anaerobic digesters.
Sewage enters the clarifier at the center and flows through ports in the top of the central vertical
pipe, then radially to a peripheral effluent wier. A very slowly rotating collector arm plows
settled solids to the sludge draw off pit at the center of the tank. A skimmer attached to the arm
collects scum from the surface and drops it into a scum box that drains outside the tank wall.
Both primary sludge and scum are allowed to flow into a pit located beside the clarifier. This
primary sludge in the pit is then pumped directly to the anaerobic digesters by pumps located in
the Grit Unit.
First Stage Aeration Basin
The First Stage Aeration Basin is, separated into six rectangular compartments with diffused air.
The effluent from the Primary Clarifiers flows into each compartment at three points for a step
feed process. Return activated sludge from the Intermediate Clarifiers is pumped into each
compartment at three locations further enhancing nutrient equalization.
Wastewater flowing into the First Stage Aeration Basin contains organic matter (BOD) as a food
supply. Bacteria metabolize the waste solids, producing new growth while taking in dissolved
oxygen and releasing carbon dioxide. Protozoa graze on bacteria for energy to reproduce. Some
of the new microbialgrowth dies releasing cell contents to solution for re -synthesis. After the
addition of a large population of microorganisms, aerating raw wastewater for a few hours
removes organic matter from solution by synthesis into microbial cells. Mixed liquor is
continuously transferred to the Intermediate Clarifier for gravity separation of the biological floc.
Settled floc (activated sludge) is returned continuously from the sludge hoppers at the
Intermediate Clarifiers to the First Stage Aeration Basin for mixing with entering wastewater.
Intermediate Clarifiers
Three 90 ft. diameter settling tanks receive the flow of mixed liquor from the First Stage
Aeration Basin. The purpose of the Intermediate Clarifiers is gravity separation of the biological
growth suspended in the mixed liquor effluent from the aeration basin.

The liquid flow pattern is the same as that of the Primary Clarifiers except that the sludge is
collected with suction tubes that pick up sludge at several radii in the tank. The sludge collection
system provides rapid withdrawal of sludge across the entire bottom of the tank. The retention
time of solids that settle near the tank periphery is not greater than those that land near the center,
thus, aging of the biological floc and subsequent floating solids due to gas production is
eliminated.
Settling sludge flows by gravity into the wet well in the Return Activated Pump Station #1 where
it is then pumped into the First Stage Aeration Basin. Excess sludge is wasted to the Solid
Handling Unit.
Second Stage Aeration Basin
The Second Stage Aeration Basin provides carbonaceous BOD removal and nitrification. The
basin is subdivided into six compartments with baffles for plug flow. Each compartment is
aerated with diffused air. The influent is split in control structure #4 and flows to the head of
each of the six compartments. Activated sludge from the Final Clarifier is returned to the. head of
each compartment.
The process of nitrification involves oxidation of ammonia to nitrate. The important parameters
in bacterial nitrification kinetics are temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen concentration.
Reaction rate is decreased markedly at reduced temperatures with about 80°F being the
minimum reasonable value. Optimum pH in near 8.4 s.u. and the dissolved oxygen level should
be greater than 1.0 mg/1. The system requires a long sludge retention time to preventexcessive
loss of viable nitrifying bacteria.
Since biological nitrification destroys alkalinity, lime slurry is added to the Second Stage
Aeration Basin to raise the pH to the optimum level.
Final Clarifiers
Three 105 ft. diameter settling tanks receive the flow of mixed liquor from the Second Stage
Aeration Basin. The purpose of the Final Clarifier is gravity separation of the biological growths
suspended in the mixed liquor effluent from the aeration basin. Sludge is collected and returned
to the aeration basin to maintain a supply of nitrifying organisms.
The Final Clarifiers are, except for a greater volume, identical to the intermediate clarifiers.
Sand Filter
Flow from the Final Clarifiers is diverted to the Sand Filter into up to six individual
compartments. Water enters and filters through a layer of sand, or media, removing fine
suspended particles. By removing the fine particles, TSS and BOD are reduced as well as
turbidity. Reduced turbidity is vital for UV disinfection to work properly. Polished effluent flows
through an underdrain system beneath the media.

UV Disinfection
Ultraviolet light is used for disinfection to sterilize pathogens and control nuisance
microorganisms. Eight banks, each containing thirty-two bulbs, are controlled based on the
effluent flow.
Cascade Aerator
The treated wastewater leaves the UV banks and then flows over the Cascade Aerator. Water
turbulence caused by the slats and steps increase the dissolved oxygen content of the water
entering the receiving streams.
Primary Anaerobic Digester
The Primary Anaerobic Digesters (two) function to reduce the volume of sludge by providing an
oxygen free environment for sludge digestion and gas formation. The purpose of sludge
digestion is to convert bulky, odorous, raw sludge to a relatively inert material that can be rapidly
dewatered in the absence of obnoxious odors.
The bacterial process consists of two successive processes that occur simultaneously in digesting
sludge. The first stage consists of breaking down large organic compounds and converting them
to organic acids along with gaseous by-products of carbon dioxide, methane and trace amounts
of hydrogen sulfide. In order for digestion to occur, second stage gasification is needed to
convert the organic acids to methane and carbon dioxide. This stage is very sensitive to
environmental conditions of temperature and pH.
The primary Anaerobic Digesters are completely mixed by a gas compressor that forces the
sludge gas collected under the floating cover down to the bottom of the digestion tank. The rising
gas bubbles provide complete mixing of the digested contents.
Two sludge heaters are provided to maintain the temperature at an optimum 95°F for best
digestion.
The gas collected in the digester is used to fuel the sludge heaters and heat the Solid Handling
Unit. Excess gas is allowed to bum in the waste gas burner.
Secondary Anaerobic Digester
Since the contents of the Primary Anaerobic Digester are completely mixed, no sludge
thickening is possible in this unit. The purpose of the Secondary Digester is to provide an
environment where anaerobic digestion can continue under minimum hydraulic disturbances
which result in a dense sludge at the bottom of the digester and a clear supernate above the
sludge.

Gravity Belt Press/Thickener
Waste activated sludge from the Intermediate Clarifiers and Final Clarifiers is thickened prior to
entering the primary digester.
Periodically, sludge is withdrawn from the secondary digester and sent to the belt presses (two)
to be de -watered. Polymer is added to increase efficiency. Dewatered sludge is stockpiled on
covered beds prior to disposal.

Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
Flow Schematic
Raw Sewage Pump Station
1.0-2Q
mgd
Grit Removal Unit
Raw Sewage
Influent
4.889mgd Avg ,.
rr
Grit to Disposal
mgd
Primary Clarifier
Primary Sludge
1st Stage Aeration Basin
Intermediate Clarifier
1.0-300
mgd mgd
fRetum Activated 0216ityl
BOD Make-up 0-1.4mgd
Anaerobic Digesters
2nd Stage Aeration Basin
Return Activated 0-10m
Final Clarifier
mgd
Waste Activated Sludge— to thickener
WAS— thickened
Sludge to be
"Pressed
Secondary Digester
-v
Gravity Thickener/
Belt Press
1.0-?`0
mgd
UV Disinfection
Cascade Aeration
Effluent
Discharge 001
10 MGD
4.982mgd Avg
Sludge to Disposal
3 Generators for Back up Power

ADDENDUM 2
NPDES PERMIT #NC0037508
REQUEST FOR RENEWAL
January 10, 2014
Whole Effluent Toxicity:
Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant had one failed toxicity test which occurred.
in September 2010. Our quarterly chronic pass/fail Ceriodaphnia testing resulted in a fail.
In October 2010, we split the sample between our commercial lab and a second lab. Both
tests resulted in >100%. In November 2010, the result was 57.98%. The result for the
quarter was a pass.
All testing since September 2010 has resulted in `pass' results, including four second
species tests in 2013. Our commercial lab changed in July 2011.
The following toxicity procedures are still followed each time toxicity tests are
conducted:
New tubing is installed prior to the beginning of collection.
Cleaning procedures for tubing and collection jugs are performed prior to the first
use and every toxicity collection day following.
Procedures for pouring samples into containers allow proper mixing and allow
split samples to be split properly.
The location of toxicity sample collection is at the effluent composite sample
location at the bottom of the cascade.
Chains -of -custody are filled out properly with all signatures needed and anyone
who assisted in the sample collection or handling is noted.
Any plant process changes during the week prior and the week of toxicity testing
are to be made only by the ORC.
There is no cleaning of clarifiers or basins during the week prior to and the week
of toxicity testing.
Attached are all toxicity test results for the years of 2010, 2011, 2012,.and 2013.
If you have any questions concerning our past toxicity results, please do not hesitate to
contact George Yankay at [phone].

Facility: Moore County
Ty: Research & Apalysical Laboratories
NCOO 37508
Pipe #: 001 County: Moore
Comments
Final Effluent
Signa
x I
r, R = .63sible Ch- ge
Sigr(aturdof Labors ''ry Supervisor
RAL#767183,767521.767654
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time Sept 11,2013/ 1408pm
% Eff. Repl.
Contro . Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
25
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
I 37.51
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
50
lb
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1001
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
water uuality uata
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
HIE Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mglL)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (IC)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
2
3
. 4
Avg WtlSurv. Control
15 ,
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9087
0.9460
0.8960
. 0.8280
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.8073 .
0.9053
0.9133
0.8720
15
-15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.8913
0.8200
0.9153
0.9727
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9587
0.8760
0.9367
0.8633
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9193
0.9627 -
0.8980
0.9433
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.8640
0.9387.
0.9447
0.8680
!Jay
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.8947
100.0 1
l 0.8947
100.0
0.8745
100.0
0.8998
100.0
0.9087
100.0
0.9308
(
I 100.0
0.9039
b
ti
Test Organisms
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 09/09/2013
Hatch Time: after 1600
6.92
7.06
6.94
7.07
6.93
7.07
6.91
7.08
6.93
7.08
6.93
7.07
6.98 .
7.05
8.60 /
7.10
8.60
6.60
8.50
5.50
8.60
5.30
8.60
5.70
8.60
5.30
8.60
5.40
24.5 /
24.4
24.6
24.7
24.7
24.7
24.5
24.4
24.6
24.7
24.4
24.5
24.6
24.6
4
b
ti
7.01 /
7.15
•
7.02
7.16
7.02
7.15
7.02
7.21
7.03
7.28
7.08
7.21
6.98
7.22
8.60 /
7.30
8.60
6.80
8.60
5.40
8.50
5.40
8.50 '
5.30
8.50
5.20
8.30
5.20
24.5 /
24.4
24.6
24.7
24.7
24.7
24.5
24.4
24.6
24.7
24.4
24.5
24.6
24.6
2
3
9-Sep-13
12-Sep-13 ,
15-Sep-13
24.00
23.00
24.00
67 .
60
54
46
41
43
462
482
468
0.04
0.06
0.04_
1.4
3.2
1.4
48
38
193
Survival Growth
Normal >rl 171 Overall Result
Horn. Var. fl I✓ I ChV >100%
NOEC 100% 100%
LOEC 100% 100%
ChV >100% >100%
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Stats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critica Calculated
25 10 16 2.41 0.6
37.5 10 18 2.41 -0.153
50 10 19 2.41 -0.415
75 .10 , 22 ._ ..2,41_.____
100 10 18 2.41 -0.2725
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)

acli : Moore County
NC00 37508
Pipe #: 001 County: Moore
orates/ Research & Analytical Laboratories
Signature of Q erator • Re ?o Si. =.Charge
x
Signature-6f Lab6ratory u.ervisor
Comments l! Final Effluent
RAL #759440,759759,759841
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation DatefTime
% Eff. Repl.
Contro Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
25
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
.b Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
5U
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
b Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
00 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
water uuallty uata
Control
pH (SU) init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
HIE Concentration pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) 'nit/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt (IC)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
June 5,2013 / 1456pm
2
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
15
. 15
15
15 - : -
15 -
15
15
15
0.8480
0.7067
0.7933
0.8853
15
15
15
15
15
- 15
15
15
0.8780
0.7220
. 0.8247
0.8633
15
15
15
15
15
15
-15
15
0.8140
0.8567
0.9227
0.8527
15
15
.15
15
1515
- 15
15
0.8587
0.8333
0.9607
0.8673
15
15
15
15
15
15
15 -
. 15
0.8913-
0.8633
0.7600
0.8393
15
15
15
15
15
'15
15
15
0.7787
0.8947
0.8667
0.7873
uay
% Survival
•
Avg Wt (mg)
Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
- % Survival
Avg Wt.(mg)
0.8083
100.0
0.8083
100.0
0.8220
100.0
0.8615
100.0
0.8805
100.0
0.8385
100.0
0.8318
Test Organisms
11' Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 06/03/2013
Hatch Time: after 1600
1
2
6
6.94
7.07
6.95
7.28
6.96
7.06
6.93
7.12
6.97
- 7.10
6.96
7.11
6.95
7.04
8.60 /
8.10
8.50
6.70
8.40
5.60
8.60
5.40 ,
.8.60
5.60
8.60
6.40
8.60 --
5.30
24.4 /
24.4
24.6
24.5
24.4
24.5
24.6
24.5
24.6
. 24.6
24.6
24.6-
24.4
24.6
2
b
7.16 /
7.17
7.04
7.05
7.33
7.08
7.22
7.18
7.40
7.17
7.35
. 7.17
7.17
7.15
8.60 /
7.20
8.60
5.70
8.60
5.40
8.60
5.50
8.60
-'6.20
8.60
6.00 -
8.60
- 5.60
24.4 /
24.4
24.6
24.5
24.4
24.5
24.6
24.5
24.6
- 24.6
24.6
24.6
24.4
24.6
2
3-Jun-13
6-Jun-13
9-Jun-13
23.00 :
24.00 .
24.00
46
- . 44
68
87
. 83
- 80 -
484 .
426
324
0.07
0.03
0.03
2.0
0.7
3.1
48
38
189
Survival
Normal
Hom. Var. VI
NOEC - - 100%
LOEC 100%
ChV >100%
Growth
171
If
100%
100%
>100%
Method . Steel's . Dunnett's
Stats
Conc.
25
37.5 10
50
Survival
Critical .
10
10
• 75 - 10
100 10
Calculated
19
22 .
Overall Result
ChV >100%
Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41 - -0.3154
2.41 -1.2271
22- , 2.41-1.6647
20
19 .
2.41-0.6954
2.41 -0.5426 -
DWQ Form AT-5.(1/04)

[C,N 0..//
Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Date:03/13/13
•
Facility: Moore County
-.,.Labpatory: Research.4 Analytical Laboratories
ix i:.i• �;i
Signature of eratoril1Pon Charge
x
NC00 37508 Pipe #: 001 County: Moore
Signatur{'of Laboratory Supervisor .
Comments 1 Final Effluent
RAL #, 752501,752797,752886
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:.
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/me 6-Mar-13 / 3:28 PM
% Eff. Repl.
CContro Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/originat-(rng).
2b
3
/.b Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
50
ib
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
100
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
water 6tualrty uata
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Hig Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
. Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Term. at Receipt (IC)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
2
4
Avg WtlSurv_ Control
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9713
0.9433
0.9560
0.9753
15
15
15
15
15
'15
15
15 .
0.9567
0.9247
0.9160
1.1580
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9247
1.0347
0.9100
1.0740
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
1.1000
1.0040
0.9573
. 0.8513
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
1.0120
0.8867
1.0127
0.9253
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9680
0.9073
- 0.9967
0.9713
nay
0.9615
Test Organisms
r Cultured In -House
% Survival' 100.0 Outside Supplier
Avg Wt (mg)'. 0.9615 1 Hatch Date: 3/4/2013
Survival' 100.0 Hatch Time: after1600
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.9888
100.0
0.9859
100.0
0.9782
100.0
0.9592
100.0
0.9608
2
4
6.93
7.23
6.94
7.08
6.92
7.23
6.99 .
7.29
6.98
7.16
6.94
7.14
6.94
7.10
8.60 /
8.10
8.60 ..
8.20
8.60
5.40
8.40
6.40
8.40
6.70
8.40
7.20
8.60
6.00
24.5 /
24.7
24.4
.24.7
24.4
24.8
24.4
24.8
24.5
24.7
24.6 -
24.8
24.6
24.8
2
5
6
7.63 /
7.27
7.52
7.41
7.29
7.38
7.20
. 7.06
7.20
7.35
7.43
7.47
7.29
7.46
8.50 /
8.00
8.50
7.90
8.40
5.90
8.40
6.40
8.50
7.90
8.60
6.90
8.50
5.90
24.5 /
24.7
24.4
24.7
24.4
24.8
24.4
24.8
24.5.
24.7
24.6
24.8
24.6
24.8
2
3
4-Mar-13
7-Mar-13
10-Mar-13
24.00
23.00
24.00
111
107
103
142
123 :
125
506
480
463
0.06
<0.01
0.03
0.5
0.7
1.8
48
38
198
Survival
Normal d I`
Hom. Var. 11.
NOEC 100%
Growth Overall Result
EI ChV
• 100%
LOEC 100% 100%
-ChV >100% >100%
Method Steel's Dunnett's
>100%.
Stats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
25 10 , 16 2.41 -0.5003
37.5 10 18 2.41 -0.4455
50 10 20 2.41 -0.3048
75 10 18 2.41 0.0422
100 10 18.5 2.41 0.0119

-- Effluent Tc.xicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
4 Facility'Moore County
NCOO 37508 Pipe #: 001 County: Moore
Laboratory: Research & Analytical Laboratories
J.
Signature of Oper fin Re'sp'or}¢j`b
x
Signature o
orat
Supervis
Comments 1 Final Effluent
RAL # 74595874�2
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
h
BY:
Test Initiation Date/Time Dec 05,12 / 1445pm
. % Eff. Repl.
Contro Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
251 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
37.5
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
50
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
75
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
100
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality uata
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Hic Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Terrp. at Receipt (iC)
Dilution H2O
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
2
3
4
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9173
0.9627
0.9547
0.8593
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.8813
0.8620
0.9527
0.9507
15
15 .
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9893
0.9320
0.9527
1.0433
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
- 15
0.8533
0.8940
0.8927
0.9286
15
15
15
.15
15
15
15
15
0.9987
1.1053
0.9573
0.9440
15
15
15
15
15
15 .
15
15
0.9093
0.9567
0.8927
0.7527
Day
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.9235
100.0
0.9235
100.0
0.9117
100.0
0.9793
100.0
0.8922
100.0
1.0013
100.0
0.8779
Test Organisms
I_ Cultured In -House
j+ Outside Supplier.
Hatch Date: 12/3/2012
Hatch Time: after1600
1
2
3
5
6.94
7.15
7.04
6.98
6.98
6.75
7.02
6.67
7.12
6.97
6.99
6.84
7.06
7.09
8.60 /
6.40
8.50
6.60
8.50
.6.40
8.60
6.30
8.50
6.00
8.60
5.80
8.60
6.10
24.5 /
24.8
24.6
24.8
24.7
24.6
24.6
24.6
24.7
24.5
24.6
24.8
24.7
24.6
1
4
5
b
7.25 /
7.20
7.16
6.93
7.39
6.82
7.44
6.80
7.26
6.91
7.14
6.93
7.21
6.99
8.60 /
6.00
8.50
6.30
8.50
6.30
8.60
5.40
8.40
5.70
8.50
5.30
8.50
5.40
24.5 /
24.8
. 24.6
24.8
24.7
24.6
24.6
24.6
24.7
24.5
24.5
24.8
24.7
24.6
2
3-Dec-12
6-Dec-12
9-Dec-12
23.25
23.50
23.00
106
. 105
94
147
139
143
532
501
401
0.03
<0.01
<0.01
2.4
2.1
2.6
48
38
207
Survival
Normal F"k
Hom. Var. Irk
NOEC 100%
Growth Overall Result
1115I; ChV
qr
100%
LOEC 100% 100%
ChV >100% >100%
Method Steel's Dunnett's
>100%
Stats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
25 10 16 2.41 0.2841
37.5 10 22 2.41 -1.3411
50 10 14 2.41 0.7531
75 10 23 2.41 -1.8696
100 10 15 2.41 1.0966
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)

x ( ` •� ,�
lgn u�
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP
Laboratory Perfor ing Test:
f ./
ram.
S'- o rOperator- n Responsible Charge
NPDES#: NC003750B Pipe#:
R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
eo Laboratory Supervisor
e-aodd,,
Date:
tar
Date:
001 Count
cn
Comments: Fin
BYav------ee.o...moe...
* PASSED: 2.87% Reduction *
Work Order: 773726/77389
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21 25 23 24 22 25 23 22 24 25 22 23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
Effluent t: 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
20
23
25
21
25
20
22
23
23
24'
21
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.031
Tabular t = •2.508
Reduction = 2.87
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.25
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
22.58
Treatment 2
Control CV'
5.836%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS
X
FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample
6.95.
7.02
7.22
7.30
s
t
a
r
t
1st
6.93
7.02
6.98
7.06
s
t
a
r
t
sample 1st
e
n
d
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.4
e
n
d
sample
8.6
8.3
8.6
8.3
2nd sample
6.96
7.04
6.98
7.06
s
t e
a n
r d
t
2nd sample
8.6
8.4
8.5 8.3
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/04/13
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/02/13 Sample 2: 12/04/13
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample
Grab Comp. Duration
X 23.3 hrs
X 23.3 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
48
196
496
499
0.02
0.04
1.7
3.5
combining replicates)
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
start/end
LC50 =
95t Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
High
Conc.
D.O.
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

1
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 09/19/13
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
LaY2Qratory Performer Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
:, / .
gna } re' rat -Or ill Responsible Charge
X
Sim atfre'o' oratory Supervisor
* PASSED: 0.36% Reduction *
Work Order: 767183/76752
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
22
25
21
23
21
25
24
22
23
21
25
22
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
25
24
23
23
21
21
25
21
22
24
23
21
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 0.36
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.83
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
22.75
Treatment
2
Control CV
6.946%
control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
6.92
7.00
7.01
7.10
6.95
7.02
6.95
7.03
6.94
7.02
6.94
7.03
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a n
✓ d r d r d
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.3
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.3
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test•
(Mortality expressed as %
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/11/13
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/09/13 Sample 2: 09/12/13
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D.
I S S
Sample 1 X 24.1 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 23 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
193
462
482
0.04
0.06
1.4
3.2
combining replicates)
%
%
%
%
%
%
.
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit _
Spearman Karber _ Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Control
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 06/13/13.
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Laboratory Performing/Testy R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
Comments: Final Effluent
\Signa're- r=0• rator in,jRespons
Sig at e'er :•oratory Supervisor
* PASSED: 1.77% Reduction *
Work Order: 759440/75975
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
25
22
24
25
23
21
25
22
23
24
25
24
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
L
Effluent a: 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
.# Young Produced
23
25
21
25
23
24
22
23
24
21
22
25
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.717
Tabular t = 2.508
Reduction = 1.77
's Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.58
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
23.17
Treatment 2
Control CV
5.847%
control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
1000
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
6.94
7.02
7.16
7.24
t e
a n
✓ d
t
1st sample
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.4
6.95
7.04
6.97
7.06
6.96
7.03
6.98
7.07
s s
t e t e
a n a n
✓ d r d
t t
1st sample 2nd sample
8.6
8.3
8.6
8.3
8.5
8.2
8.5
8 •. 2
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %., combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/05/13
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/03/13 Sample 2: 06/06/13
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 23.1 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 23.8 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(Amhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
189
484
426
0.07
0.03
2.0
0.7
96
O
0
96
0
0
0
96
96
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
• -- o
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Control
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 03/14/13
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Laborato y PerforRing:.'Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
f r f" ,
'-g g " u,r �O er� in Responsible Charge
x
a oratory Supervisor
Comments: Final Effluent
* PASSED: 0.37% Reduction *
Work Order: 752501/75279
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
23
21
24
22
22
21
25
23
22
24
25
21
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
Effluent %: 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
23
21
25
23
23
21
21
24
23
21
23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
L,
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.143
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 0.37
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.75
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
22.67
Treatment
2
Control CV
6.526%
control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100 %
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
6.93
7.02
7.33
7.40
s
t e
a n
✓ d
t
1st sample
8.6
8.4
8.5
8.4
6.96
7.04
7.05
7.13
s
t e
a n
✓ d
t
1st sample 2nd sample
6.94
7.03
7.04
7.12
8.5
8.2
8.5
8.2
s
t
a
r
t
e
n
d
8.5
8.3
8.5
8.3
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/06/13
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/04/13 Sample 2: 03/07/13
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A .A
U M M
Sample 2 X 22.8 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
198
506
480
0.06
0.01
0.5
0.7
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r.,,, n
•
pH
D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 12/13/12
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 0017.0
Laboratory Performing Test: R & A LABORATORIES,
ure f Op or Re ponsible Charge
X
S: natire o:/ boratory Supervisor
INC.
Torgu'
Comments: Fin telliW 2012 v
BY: ...........
PASSED: -0.37% Reduction *
Work Order: 745958/74629
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
23
22
21
23
24
21
25
24
22
25
21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
L
Effluent %: 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6
9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
23
21
24
24
22
21
22
24
21
24
23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.143
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -0.37
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.67
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
22.75
Treatment 2
Control CV
6.869%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS
FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
6.94
7.02
7.25
7.33
s
t e
a n
✓ d
t
1st sample
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.4
1st sample
7.01
7.08
6.99
7.06
s
t
a
r
t
1st
2nd sample
6.98
7.05
6.98
7.06
s
e t
n a
d r
t
sample 2nd sample
8:6
8.3
8.6
8.3
e
n
d
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.3
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %,
combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/05/12
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/03/12 Sample 2: 12/06/12
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp. Duration
X 23.3 hrs
X 23.4 hrs
D
I
L
-U
T
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
207
532
501
0.03
�.01
2:4
2.1
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
start/end
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% - o
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit _
Spearman Karber _ Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
Control
start/end
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration (hrs) :
High
Conc.
D.O.
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

A d 0)*
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP
Cl/ECITC117gUril
Date Dv2110 .
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
BY:...............omooe
Laboratory Performin Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
(e._ O % /
Sign�lue ; ��era 6r i�RespCharge
eoaboratory Supervisor
Comments: Final Effluent
* PASSED: -0.72% Reduction *
Work Order: 739899/74020
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
23
22
24
21
25
22
25
24
23
23
21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
22
24
24
22
23
25
24
21
23
23
24
24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.323
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -0.72
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.08
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
23.25
Treatment
2
Control CV
5.974%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood.
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH.
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
6.93
7.01
7.27
7.34
6.93
7.02
7.28
7.37
6.94
7.02
7.30
7.38
s s s
t e t e t
a n a n a
✓ d r d r
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.3
8.6
8.3
e
n
d
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.3
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/12/12
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/10/12 Sample 2: 09/12/12
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 22.8 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
194.
442
431
0.03
0.04
1.7
0.8
combining replicates)
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Control
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Da
e AiA3%4 )2
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP NPDES#: N00037508 Pipe#:
Laboratory` Performing Test:_R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
- ! i f / /
Si atu •' Operator in Regponss.ble Charge
X
gn t re ►f' Laboratory Supervisor
001 Cotetyr,; g oeeve_evo
Comments: Final Effluent
* PASSED: 0.75% Reduction *
Work Order: 734059/73434
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
22
20
28
20
24
23
21
19
24
20
24
23
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L•
Effluent %: 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
23
23
21
20
23
23
22
24
20
23
23
21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.201
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 0.75
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.33
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
22.17
Treatment 2
Control CV
11.349%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
1000
PASS
FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
.Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
6.96
7.04
6.92
7.01
s
t
a
r
t
1st
6.94
7.04
6.83
6.92
s
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 1st sample
8.5
8.3
8.5
8.3
8.6
8.1
8.6
8.2
6.99
7.16
7.08
7.37
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
8.5
8.0
8.1
8.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/20/12
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/18/12 Sample 2: 06/20/12
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab Comp. Duration
X 23.8 hrs
X 23.5 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
s
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
117
194
479
544
0.04
0.04
1.5
2.9
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit -
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
Control
start/end
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
High
Conc.
D.O.
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Dattutm
e/� U
MOORE CO. WWTP NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 Count
iL r .
Fa
cility:
Laboratory Performing Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
ri
pe atoi n Responsible Charge
na e o Laboratory Supervisor
Comments: Final Eff.ynt
* PASSED: 1.09% Reduction *
Work Order: 726029/72632
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
23
22
24
21
25
21
22
25
21
24
24
22
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
Effluent 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 - 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
23
22
24
21
22
22
23
21
22
24
25
22
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.440
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 1.09
Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.83
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
22.58
Treatment 2
Control CV
6.690%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS . FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
6.94
7.03
6.88
6.96
6.93
7.03
6.95
7.04
6.94
7.02
6.96
7.05
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a n
✓ d r d r d
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.3
8.5
8.2
8.5
8.2
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.4
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/07/12
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/05/12 Sample 2: 03/07/12
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 21.6 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24.2 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
182
377
486
0.03
0.03
2.9
3.4
as %, combining replicates)
%
%
%
%
%
%
96
%
%
%
%
96
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Control
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effl▪ uent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 12/15/11
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
Sign-`0 r�n0_it�r_2i}esponsible Charge
X
S
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
natu4re`o%Laboratory Supervisor
Comments: Final Effluent
* PASSED: 1.80% Reduction *
Work Order: 719437/71979
PY
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
-:CONTROL ORGANISMS
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
21
24
22
22
25
23
24
21
24
25
23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
L
Effluent %: 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
25
24
22
24
21
22
22
25
22
24
21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.692
Tabular t = 2.508
Reduction = 1.-80
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.17
Control
0:00
Treatment
2
22.75
Treatment 2
Control CV
6.058%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
6.93
7.01
6.99
7.08
6.94
7.03
7.03
7.12
s s
t e t
a n a
✓ d r
t t
1st sample 1st
8.6
8.4
8.5
8.3
6.6
8.5
sample
8.3
8.2
6.92
7.01
7.02
7.10
s
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
2nd sample
8.5
8.3
6.4
8.2
LC50/Acute Toxicity. Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining
replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/07/11
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/05/11 Sample 2: 12/07/11 d
Sample Type/Duration 1st 2n2nP/d
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 23.8 hrs L AU M M
Sample 2 X 23.6 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
182
350
513
0.02
0.04
0.8
2.3
96
%
%
96
96
96
%
96
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
o
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Control
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
Duration(hrs):

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 09/22/11
Facility: MOORE CO. WWTP NPDES#
Laboratory. Performing Test: R & A LABORATO
Si= r�Atre , ng'at
Laboratory Supervisor
as
. ij:7508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Comments: Final Effluent
* PASSED: 1.82% Reduction.*
Work Order: 712295/71260
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
23
24
21
25
22
23
22
23
25
21
24
22
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
Effluent %: 50%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
25
24
22
22
24
23
23
21
22
21
22
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.758
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 1.82
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.92
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
22.50
Treatment
2
Control CV
6:017%
control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
1st sample
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
6.94
7.01
6.87
6.94
1st sample 2nd sample
6.93
7.03
7.01
7.10
6.93
7.01
7.02
7.10
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a n
✓ d •r d r d
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.6
8.4
8.5
8.3
8.6
8.3
8.5
8.2
8.5
8.3
8.5
8.3
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either. Test
Test Start Date: 09/14/11
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/12/11 Sample 2: 09/14/11
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 23.5 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 22.5 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(Amhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
182
368
370
0.04
0.08
3.6
4.0
96
96
96
%
96
%
%
%
%
9-6
96
96
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average- Probit
Spearman Karber - Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Control
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

ir
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail an cut 50
: 06/23/11
Facility: MOORE CO. WPCP
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: County: MOORE
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Si•natur_ O,• t•`:�;5rs ons
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor PASSED: 16.83% Reduction
Comments:
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water. Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 .2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
14
18
16
16
17.
18
15
21
22
16
18
17
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3- 4 5 6 7. 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
15
7
17
16
14
10
19
17
18
16
5
19
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.949
Tabular t = 2.508
Reduction = 16.83
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
17.33
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
14.42
Treatment
2
Control CV
13.323%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
x
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st
sample
8.25
8.08
8.08
8.18
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.67
7.54
7.83.
7.47
1st sample 2nd sample
8.22
8.08
8.07
8.24
8.21
8.14
7.99
8.16
s s
t e t e
a n a n
✓ d r d
t t
1st sample 2nd sample
7.40
7.29
7.35
7.31
7.40
7.30
7.56
7.19
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/15/11
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/13/11 Sample 2: 06/15/11
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 22 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24.6 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(pmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
46
182
439
492
<0.1
<0.1
1.3
0.7
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
96
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
%-- a
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end . start/end
Control
High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and A
: 04/01/11
Facility: MOORE CO. WPCP
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#:
Laboratory Performing Test MERI CH LABS, INC.
Signature o 0le Charge
X•"r ,s,:_ wf
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Comments:
County: MOORE
(71'I rl r_+e-.--1e-ac7nrrz%
III� \!1
kPP
(1 0 rzn rt .tBi . U
V
* PASSED: 7BVI_$educLioz-b -*---
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
18
21
20
24
24
21
22
24
23
25
25
25
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
22
20
18
20
22
25
22
19
15
24
27
18
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.425
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 7.35
Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.67
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
21.00
Treatment
2
Control CV
10.013%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS
FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample
8.20
8.13
7.91
8.06
s
t e
a n
✓ d
t
1st sample
7.64
7.54
8.01
7.30
8.16
8.10
7.98
8.02
s
t e
a n
✓ d
t
1st sample
7.74
7.48
7.80
7.40
2nd sample
8.21
7.97
7.97
8.08
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
7.60
7.44
7.76
7.40
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/23/11
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/21/11 Sample 2: 03/23/11
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp. Duration
X 23 hrs
X
24.7 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(pmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
44
180
432
436
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.5
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber- _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High-
rnnr
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
D.O.
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver.. 4.41)

1M1,
- Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic ss;/Fa�lS,-• nd`l�cute LC50
, u,a.e
r tr7 ,s •, r =- rm
LL
iw1?2 .2'2=/ 10 EJ (t 6
Facility: MOORE COUNTY NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 Coungy: MOORE �J
'I o-e.o-eomevo_--o--o
Labor ryPig/formingTest: !' RITECH, INC.
Signatu e o Ope -tor in syonsible Carge
7,7
X
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor,
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Comments: dilution water batch
number 847 and 848 used.
* PASSED: -18.31% Reduction *
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality NC DENR t
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 445
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
20
27
25
27
22
28
27
26
11
24
24
23
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
29
27
29
30
30
23
30
28
27
28
26
29
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = -18.31
gEMENMETVEIET
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.67
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
28.00
Treatment
2
Control CV
19.599%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAIL
Check One
• pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.11
8.02
7.8.8
7.92
8.17
7.88
7.83
7.81
8.03
8.09
7.92
7.94
s s s
t e t e t
a n a n a
✓ d r d r
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.65
7.58
7.64
7.50
7.67
7.54
7.87
7.74
e
n
d
7.85
7.42
7.89
7.40
- ;�.G 1•^ (i".v -T:y'S +ZP " fF:h::l',�1)}° t] Tn>`s'i. {'v.'t1,. ;. . ly+. (u Lri ; s MP[1.k i:; ICS1I...:
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 12/15/10
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/13/10 Sample 2: 12/16/10
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 23.3 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(pmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
42
180
460
472
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
0.3
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
o
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r.,,,,,,
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
•
D.O.
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Facility
Effluent Aquatic T
' E
LabRrato-Perforrrying Tests �t= t " t (j) r `�
LJ V
Phase El Chronic Cer!odar hnia
NPDES#: NC )0374 0"d" Pipe# oci County
Signature of Lab Supervisor
Sample Information
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite
(Duration)
Hardness(mg/I
Spec.Cond.(i.lmhos/c
Chlorine(mg/I
Sample temp. at receip
Control
Effluent%
Effluent%
Effluent%
L1I
Effluent%
Effluent%
(op
1
# Young
Organism#
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 mean
LL V
2010 v
J.
(t!\c,,}gY:o.®. ee_
Comments
Test
Information*
Start Date
HH/34o
Start
End Date
ft44/iD
Renews
Renew2
Start Time
/ tpp-
Start
End Time
Renews
Renew
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
°Id
'7.519
7, al
7.1
1t e}
r
Control
7.,47
'P
Control
tYt
797
Control
%.[if)
7eC1
24.1
7,13
7Le
r�Ct!
p7` ,.
r
20
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead,
L
L-
"lam
L_
1
3 4
L--
LI L
7
L-
1211
L-
L
9 10 11 12
L.y--
;3
L<
Mean
# Young
1
)-
it--
L.
l_._--
L—
U--
,.
�.-
^
__
1.___
%Red
.T., s
6
#Young
p
V
)1
2.4-
;
?..)
.2.1
0
id,
2.,,
CI
%Red
E3
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
t—
L__3
i__-
L.-
L
" 1..--
L.—
L
L
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
1
2
f.1
3
L
/34
% Red
7
1
fc�
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean
L.
.D,
f-3
�3
1
1-1
L.
Mean
Red
iL.
7.
7.'7 7
7.is
Li
a
7.71
-1(4
--33 •ify
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality °
L)
% Control 3rd Brood ei
Control Repro CV Cq
48 Hour Mortality
Control IWC
of
/.f of /6'/I
Significant?
Final Mortality S'
%I
Reproduction Analysis: d�
Repro. L OEC= %; NOEC= I / %
Method:
Normal Distrib? v Method:
Statistic: /1.'7 Critical: / L- 5
Equal Variances? / 6 Method:
Statistic: le .`t Critical:_
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable):
Methodk7g
Effluent d/e Rank'Sum Critical Sum
7`a.Z 75� /
IOC
ft-
Overall Analysis:
Result = PASS/FAIL or r
Test LOEC= ¶- %; NOEC= / e/a
t:
Chronic Value= ,` �jg`
MAIL
TO:
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
*Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form/Phase. II Chronic' i4
a
Facility 11 �41 1 . ! -v Lt: r+mot
Laboratory Performing Tex '.t1 `'1-c.1- 1'\e
X ' ,,.� i'
1/4
Signature of Lab Supervisor
gnature of O.R.C.
NPDES#: NC CO,V1568
Pipe# WI County
tuk c!i'
Comments Wo..4- 3'- •
Sample Information
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
Collection Start Date.
.
Grab
Composite
(Duration)
A
%
23.E
Hardness(mg/I
Spec.Cond.(pmhos/c
.._41.
:
-
:. 50
4o 4c
Chlorine(mg/I
C°. $
t O. !
Sample temp. at receipt
0, y, °C
(}, 5 °C
Control
Effluent%
Effluent%
.20.5
1
#YoUng
Test
Information*
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
Start Date
End Date
e
E9/fit
Start Time
et 54:4.
End Time
41:t5
Start
Renewl
Renew2
Start
Renewl
Renew2
IUD
i007.
Control
Control
Control
7.
E. ✓
r 5
'C, 9
8,25
6:/6
'73E
r7. f'7
8.83
21.2+
24-4
'1. 54
25.t5
/1. 51
/1.Ai5
4
11.66
1.
2.4.5
103
25,6
24.2
25.1
"5.4
25. *1
Organism#
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
�I
14-
24
Jj
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
L
L
L
L
L
L.
L
L
L
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
# Young
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
1
2(6
2
24
L
1 2
21
L.
L
3
L
4
25
L
Mean
r.
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality %
% Control 3rd Brooc
Control Repro CV
'
60
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mean
L
L
3 4 5 6
25
L
L
24
L
ZS
L
25
L
L
2
L
7 8 9- 10
phi
L
L
Ji
L
1
L
Mean
41,11
%Red
Mean.
Effluent%
# Young,
1
1
L
..,
—
"
.
—
Z)_,
�"'1,:.
41
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L_
L
L
L
L-
L
L
,L
%Red
it
Effluent%
#Young
92_
24
1`i
1
z4.J
i
2()
E.
21-1
2✓
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
3
L
!3 -.
L
L
1-
L
%
t -
Effluent%
100
# Young
Adult
(L) ive - (D)ead
1
19
L
2
2.5
L
3
28
L
4
25
L
5
25
L
6
8
L
L
Mean
tio
%Red
48 Hour Mortality
Control IWC
If of
Significant?
Final Mortality Si
%
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC=>/I = %; NOEC=11:D %
Method:
Normal d Distrib? :I Method:�ccr'v
Statistic:1.f •2 Critical: 6: i
Equal Variances? iti MethodAQickhli
Statistic: ?'` • ` Critical: i.<
Non-Parametric.Analysis (if applicable
Method:t
Effluent %
Rank Sum
EEC
Critical Sum
f-- :i
Overall Analysis:
Result PASS/FAPASS/FAR.or cl
Test LOEC 00 %; NOEC= v' ' %
Chronic Value= ,? fly.?Y %
MAIL
TO:
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621
*Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/I
t% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

Effluent Ai is tic#,'I' Ile urt\Ph .II Chronic Ceripodaphnia 10/27/10
Facility Moore County P
Labor 1y rformin
X
Sihddtur•'of O.R.
Research
X
NPDES#NC 0037508
7a bs c.
tiatur� u perviso r
Pipe# 001 County Moore
Comments: Final Effluent
686662/687083
Sample Information
Sample 1
Sample 2
Control
Collection Start Date
10/18/10
10/21/10
'rR `fs
Grab
Reinai..g..
Composite
rr
(Duration)
24 hrs
23.9 hrs.
ITS r .
T;;,,, .'
Hardness (mg/1)
r' . a
� ! .-,:
48
Spec.Cond. (umhos/cm)
414
440
182
Chlorine (mg/L)
0.06
0.03
..iA';r
4 '° .,, 'tl - ns:.
Sample temp. at receipt
2.9°C
2.4°C
r.WW;;;::''
Control
Effluent %
110.25
Effluent %
20.5
Effluent %
41
Effluent %
82
Effluent %
100
Organism#
2 3 4 5 6 7
8
Test
Information*
Start Date
10/20/10
• End Date
10 27/10
Start Time
14:34 PM
End Time
9:37 AM
Treatment
pH Initial
pH Final
D.O. Initial
D.O. Final
Temp. Initial
Temp. Final
Start
Renew 1
_ Renew 2
Start
Renew 1
s
Renew 2
100%
100.0%
100.0%
Control
Control
Control
7.10
7.11
7.14
6.92
6.94
6.95
7.19
7.20
7.22
7.00
7.03
7.03
8.3
8.4
8.4
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.3
8.3
8.4
24.6
24.8
24.9
24.2 .
24.4
24.5
25.0
25.0
24.9
25.0
25.0
24.9
9
10
11
'12
Mean
# Young
23
24
22
24
21
23
22
25
21
25
23.0
Adult .
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
o rS f
?j ':
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
Mean
# Young
22
25
26
23
21
24
24
21
24
22
23.2
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
% Red t
-0.87
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mean
# Young
21
25
21
24
25
21
24
23
23
21
22.8
Adult
% Red
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L'
L
L
L
L
L
L
0.87
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mean
# Young
24
21
25
22
.22
23
22
21
22
23
22.5
Adult
% Red
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
2.17
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mean
# Young
23
21
20
22
24
20
23
21
20
21
21.5
Adult
% Red
6.52
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mean
# Young
20
22
19
20
21
22
20
18
19
20
20.1
Adult
(L)ive (D)ead
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
% Red
12.61
Chronic Test Results
Final Control Mortality %
% Control 3rd Brood
Control Repro CV
0
100
6.48
48 Hour Mortality
Control IWC
0 of 10 0 of 10
Significant
Y
Fiinal Mortality Significant
%
or
No Conc.
Reproduction Analysis:
Repro. LOEC = 100% NOEC = 82 %
Method: Dunnett's T-test
Normal Distrib? yes Method: Kolmogorov
Statistic: 0.726 Critical: 1.035
Equal Variances? yes Method: Bartlett's
Statistic: 1.337 Critical: 15.086
Non -Parametric Analysis (if applicable)
Method:
Effluent% Rank Sum Critical Sum
Overall Analysis:
Result = PASS\FAIL or
TestLOEC= >100 %: NOEC= 100 %
Chronic Value= >100 0/0
ATT: Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. Of Water Quality
MAIL N.C. DENR
TO 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
* Should use highest test concentration or
highest concentration with D.O. >5.0 mg/1
1% Reduction from Control Reproduction Mean
Copy DWQ form AT-3 (8/91) Rev. 11/95

ail and Acute LC50 Date: 09/29/10
• i
Effluent Toxicity Report F
Facility: MOORE COUNTY NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe*: 001 County: MOORE
n c=.1 ra cwn
Laborator r Perform ng Zest : MERITECH, INC.
nat e of Operator in Responsible ChRrge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
20
28
23
24
21
24
26
27
26
24
20
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
13
22
15
16
18
20
13
24
18
20
23
19
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated "t = 4.332
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 23.53
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Conti.ol
24.08
Control
16.67
Treatment 2
18.42
Treatment
2
Control CV
11.122%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.00
7.90
7.78
7.86
8.06.
7.91
7.76
7.76
7.89,
7.83
7.66
7.76
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a n
✓ d r d r d
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.44
7.34
7.42
7.34
7.70
7.35
7.85
7.25
7.59
7.39
7.61
7.39
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 09/22/10
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/20/10 Sample 2: 09/23/10..
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 23.4 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 23.8 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
40
177
467
490
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
0.8
96.
96
%
96
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = .%
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving.Average - Probit
Spearman Karber Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r,,,
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
D.O.
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail Acute / 1 and t LC50
Facility: MOORE COUNTY
1--I , c
CC1 C 1 C7 C7 C7 C� Th
U LL LI-,
L{te:11�0}6/24/100j��
NPDES#: NC0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: 'OR
1�+9�
Laboratory Performin est: MERITECH, INC. .
X�
Sig atur of Opera or in Responsible Charge
X l�
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
EN:
Comments: Dilution Water Batch
#813 & 814 Used
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
26
25
28
21
24
27
26
25
26
25
26
27
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
23
21
22
16
21
16
20
23
27
20
18
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
PASSED: 17.32% Reduction *
Rmeentall-Se-ienees-E-ranch
Div. of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 3.939
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 17.32
145
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
25.50
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
21.08
Treatment
2
Control CV
6.995%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAI
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.08
8.02
7.93
8.03
8.10
8.04
7.84
8.00
8.10
8.00
7.94
7.96
s s s
t e t e t
a n a n a
✓ d r d r
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.40
7.38
7.45
7.40
7.54
7.30
7.64
7.26
e
n
d
7.55
7.27
7.56
7.21
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining. replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 06/16/10
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/14/10 Sample 2: 06/17/10
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24.1 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 23.4 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond. (p.mhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
44
172
442
448
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
2.1
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average - Probit _
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
Onn r+
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
D.O.
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 03/25/10
Facility: MOORE COUNTY NPDES#: NO0037508 Pipe#: 001 County: MOORE
Laboratory Performing ,re r`' : MERITECH, INC.
Sign ture Ope sa or in Responsible Char
Signature of Laboratory Supevi
Work Order:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3
Comments: Dilution Water Batch
#795 & 796 Used
* PASSED: -4.58% Reduction *
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: ' NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1621 E45
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1.130
Tabular t = 2.508
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = -4.58
# Young Produced
16
22
23
23
22
21
22
21
23-
23
23
23
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
Effluent %: 41%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
27
23
22
19
20
25
23
21
25
24
24
21
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
21.83
Control.
0.00
Treatment
2
22.83
Treatment
2
Control CV
9.126%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.97
7.80
7.32
7.72
s
t
a
r
t
1st
7.87:
7.85
7.51
7.88
a
r
t
sample 1st
e
n
d
7.73
7.88
8.12
7.96
e
n
d
sample
7.80
7.62
8.12
7.52
7.96
7.88
7.68
7.80
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
d
7.53
7.38
7.72
7.23
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining replidates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/17/10
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/15/10 Sample 2: 03/18/10
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24.2 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 23.9 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine (mg/ 1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
42
170
398
429
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.2
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average - Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
rnnr
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs) :
D.O.
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

RESEARCH & ANAIytkCAE
LABORATORIES? INCe
Analytical/Process Consultations
March.26, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Sampling Location
(A Moore County WWTP Project, collected 08 March 2013)
BY:
PPA-
I. Miscellaneous Method Detection Effluent Date
Parameters Units Number Limit 0308055 Analyzed Analyst
°Antimony, Total mg/L 200.7 0.025 BDL. 03/12/13 JC
'Arsenic, Total mg/L 200.7 0.010 BDL' 03/12/13 JC
. Beryllium, Total mg/L 200.7 0.001 BDL• 03/12/13 JC
• Cadmium, Total mg/L 200.7 0.002 BDL• 03/12/13 JC
• Calcium, Total mg/L 200.7 N/A 31.0 • 03/15/13 JC
' Chromium,Total mg/L 200.7 0.005 BDL• 03/12/13 JC
• Copper,Total mg/L 218.2 0.002 0.007• - 03/12/13 JC
• Lead,Total mg/L 200.7 0.005 BDL• 03/12/13 JC
• Nickel,Total mg/L 200.7 0.010 BDL' 03/12/13 JC
- Selenium, Total mg/L 200.7 0.010 BDL' 03/12/13 JC
• Silver,Total mg/L 200.7 0.005 BDL • 03/12/13 JC
•Thallium, Total mg/L 200.7 0.005 BDL• 03/19/13 JC
• Zinc, Total mg/L 200.7 0.010 0.062 • 03/12/13 JC
—Nitrate (NO-3-N) mg/L SM 4500 NO3 E 0.050 0.710 03/08/13 DW
— Nitrite (NO-2-N) mg/L SM 4500 NO2 B 0.010 0.013 03/08/13 DW
Dissolved Solids mg/L SM 2540C 5.00 320 03/11/13 YJ
• Hardness, Total mg/L SM 2340C 1.00 97.9 • 03/11/13 AP
• Total Nitrogen mg/L N/A 1.00 BDL` 03/25/13 AA
- TKN mg/L SM4500NH3 F 1.00 BDL• 03/25/13 ZP
• NO2+NO3 mg/L SM4500NO3 E 0.050 0.723- 03/08/13 DW
• Phosphorus,Total mg/L SM4500 PE 0.050 2.08 • 03/11/13 MS
RAL Sample Number
Collection Date
Collection Time
752809
03/08/13
0845
mg/L = milligrams per Liter = parts per million (ppm)
BDL = Below Detection Limit

RESEARCh &.ANAtyT9Citi
0
LAbORATORkESP ONCO
Analytical/Process Consultations
March 26,2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Sampling Location
(A Moore County WWTP Project, collected 08 March 2013)
I. Miscellaneous Method Detection Effluent Date
Parameters Units Number Limit 0308059 Analyzed Analyst
Cyanide mg/L SM4500 CN E 0.005 BDL• 03/12/13 YJ
RAL Sample Number 752810
Collection Date 03/08/13
Collection Time 0840
mg/L = milligrams per Liter = parts per million (ppm)
BDL = Below Detection Limit

RESEARCh & ANAEyTkkA[
LAb®RATORIES,
Analytical/Process Consultations
March 26, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer.
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Sampling Location
(A Moore County WWTP Project, collected 08 March 2013)
I. Miscellaneous
Parameters
• Oil & Grease
• Phenols
RAL Sample Number
Collection Date
Collection Time
BY
Method Detection Effluent Date
Units Number Limit 0308061 Analyzed . Analyst
EPA 1664
EPA 420.1
5.0 6.35' 03/13/13 MS
0.005 BDL' 03/11/13 YJ
752812
03/08/13
0840
mg/L = milligrams per Liter = parts per million (ppm)
BDL = Below Detection Limit

R ES EARCII . . } NALyTBCAi
LAbORATORkkSP I NC,
Analytical/Process Consultations
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Water Sample Identified as PPA
(A Moore County WPCP Project, collected 08 March 2013)
)(.
Volatile Organics Quantitation PPA II, Semi -volatile Organics Quantitation PPA
EPA Method 624 Limit Method 625 Limit
Parameter (m¢/L) (mg/L) Parameter (m2./L) (mp/L)
Methylene Chloride 0.010 BQL 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 0.010 BQL
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.010 BQL 2-Chlorophenol 0.010 BQL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.010 BQL 2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.010 BQL
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.010 BQL 2,4-Dimethylphenol 0.010 BQL
Chloroform . 0.010 BQL 2,4-Dinitrophenol 0.050 BQL
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.010 BQL 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 0.050 BQL
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.010 BQL 2-Nitrophenol 0.010 BQL
Trichloroethene 0.010 BQL 4-Nitrophenol 0.050 BQL
Dibromochloromethane 0.010 BQL Pentachlorophenol 0.050 BQL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.010 BQL Phenol 0.010 BQL
Tetrachloroethee 0.010 BQL 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.010 BQL
Chlorobenzene 0.010 BQL Acenaphthene 0.010 BQL
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.010 BQL Acenaphthylene 0.010 BQL
1,2-Dichlorcethane 0.010 BQL Anthracene 0.010 BQL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.010 BQL Benzidine 0.050 BQL
Bromodichloromethane 0.010 BQL Benzo(a)anthracene 0.010 BQL
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.010 BQL Benzo(a)pyrene 0.010 BQL
Benzene 0.010 BQL Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.010 BQL
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.010 BQL Benzo(ghi)perylene 0.010 BQL
Bromoform 0.010 BQL Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.010 BQL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.010 BQL Benzyl butyl phthalate 0.010 BQL
Toluene 0.010 BQL Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 0.010 BQL
Ethyl Benzene 0.010 BQL Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 0.010 BQL
Chloromethane 0.010 BQL Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 0.010 BQL
Bromomethane 0.010 BQL Bis(2-ethyl-hexyl)phthalate 0.010 0.013
Vinyl Chloride 0.010 BQL 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 0.010 BQL
Chloroethane 0.010 BQL 2-Chloronaphthalene 0.010 BQL
Total Xylenes 0.010 BQL 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 0.010 BQL
Acrolein 0.100 BQL Chrysene 0.010 BQL
Acrylonitrile 0.100 BQL Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.010 BQL
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.010 BQL 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
Dilution Factor 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine 0.020 BQL
Sample Number 752811 Di-N-Butyl phthalate 0.010 BQL
Sample Date 03/08/13 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.010 BQL
Sample Time (hrs) 0840 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.010 BQL
Di-N-Octyl phthalate 0.010 BQL
Fluoranthene 0.010 BQL
Hexachlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.010 BQL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.010 BQL
Hexachloroethane 0.010 BQL
Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.010 BQL
Isophorone . 0.010 BQL
Naphthalene - 0.010 BQL
Nitrobenzene 0.010 BQL
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 0.010 BQL
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine 0.010 BQL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 0.010 BQL
Phenanthrene 0.010 BQL
Pyrene 0.010 BQL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
Dilution Factor 1
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits
mg/L = milligrams per Liter = parts per million (ppm)
Sample Number 752809
Sample Date 03/08/13
Sample Time (hrs) 0845

RESEARCIii & ANAlyTic/l
LABORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Water Sample Identified as PPA
(A Moore County WPCP Project, collected 21 June 2012)
Quantitation PPA Quantitation PPA
III. Miscellaneous Limit IV. Miscellaneous Limit
Parameters (mg/L) (mg/L) Parameters (mg/L) (mg/L)
Antimony,Total 0.025 BQL Phenols 0.005 BQL
Arsenic,Total 0.005 BQL Oil & Grease 5.0 BQL
Beryllium,Total 0.0010 BQL
Cadmium,Total 0.002 BQL Sample Number 734362
Chronuum,Total 0.005 BQL Sample Date 06/21/12
Copper,Total 0.005 0.017 Sample Time (hrs) 0932
Lead,Total 0.005 0.053
Mercury,Total 0.0002 BQL
Nickel,Total 0.005 BQL Quantitation PPA
Selenium,Total 0.005 BQL V. Miscellaneous Limit
Silver,Total 0.005 BQL Parameters (mg/L) (mg/L)
Thallium,Total 0.005 BQL
Zinc,Total 0.010 0.089 Cyanide 0.005 BQL
NH-3-N 0.100 0.128
Nitrate 0.050 21.5
Nitrite 0.010 0.015 Sample Number . 734360
Total Nitrogen 0.010 24.6 Sample Date 06/21/12
TKN 0.010 3.07 Sample Time (hrs) 0932
Phos,Tot 0.050 3.54
Dissolved Solids 5.0 380
Hardness 1.00 121
Calcium 0.200 47.5
Sample Number 734359
Sample Date 06/21/12
Sample Time (hrs) 0932

RESEARch & ANAlyiicAL
LAb®RAT®RIESp INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Water Sample Identified as PPA
(A Moore County WPCP Project, collected 21 June 2012)
I. Volatile Organics Quantitation PPA II, Semi -volatile Organics Quantitation PPA
EPA Method 624 Limit Method 625 Limit
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L)
Methylene Chloride 0.010 BQL 4-Chloro-3-rnethylphenol 0.010 BQL
Trichlorofluoromethane - 0.010 BQL 2-Chlorophenol 0.010 BQL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.010 BQL 2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.010 BQL
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.010 BQL 2,4-Dimethylphenol 0.010 BQL
Chloroform 0.010 BQL 2,4-Dinitrophenol 0.050 BQL
Carbon Tetrachloride 0,010 BQL 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 0.050 BQL
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.010 BQL 2-Nitrophenol 0.010 BQL
Trichloroethene 0.010 BQL 4-Nitrophenol 0.050 BQL
Dibromochloromethane 0.010 BQL Pentachlorophenol 0.050 BQL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.010 BQL Phenol 0.010 BQL
Tetrachloroethene 0.010 BQL 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.010 SQL
Chlorobenzene 0.010 BQL Acenaphthene 0.010 BQL
Trans-1,2-Dicbloroethene 0.010 BQL Acenaphthylene 0.010 BQL
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.010 BQL Antbracene 0.010 BQL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.010 BQL Benzidine 0.050 BQL
Bromodichloromethane 0.010 BQL Benzo(a)anthracene 0.010 BQL
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.010 BQL Benzo(a)pyrene 0.010 BQL
Benzene 0.010 BQL Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.010 BQL
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.010 BQL Benzo(ghi)perylene 0.010 BQL
Bromoform 0.010 BQL Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.010 BQL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.010 BQL Benzyl butyl phthalate 0.010 BQL
Toluene 0.010 BQL Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 0.010 BQL
Ethyl Benzene 0.010 BQL Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 0.010 BQL
Chloromethane 0.010 BQL Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 0.010 BQL
Bromomethane 0.010 BQL Bis(2-ethyl-hexyl)phthalate 0.010 BQL
Vinyl Chloride 0.010 BQL 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 0.010 BQL
Chloroethane 0.010 BQL 2-Chloronaphthalene 0.010 BQL
Total Xylenes 0.010 BQL 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 0.010 BQL
Acrolein 0.100 BQL Cluysene 0.010 BQL
Acrylonitrile 0.100 BQL Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.010 BQL
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.010 BQL 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
Dilution Factor 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine . 0.020 BQL
Sample Number 734361 Di-N-Butyl phthalate 0.010 BQL
Sample Date 06/21/12 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.010 BQL
Sample Time (hrs) 0932 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.010 BQL
Di-N-Octylphthalate 0.010 BQL
Fluoranthene 0.010 BQL
Hexachlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
Hexachlorobutadiene . 0.010 BQL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.010 BQL
Hexachlorcethane 0.010 BQL
Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.010 BQL
Isophorone 0.010 BQL
Naphthalene 0.010 BQL
Nitrobenzene 0.010 BQL
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 0.010 BQL
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine 0.010 BQL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 0.010 BQL
Phenanthrene 0.010 BQL
Pyrene 0.010 BQL
1,2,4-Tichlorobenzene 0.010 BQL
Dilution Factor 1
BQL = Below Quantitation Limits
mg/L = milligrams per Liter = parts per million (ppm)
Sample Number 734359
Sample Date 06/21/12
Sample Time (hrs) 0932

00
•
RESEARCH & ANALy1icAL
LAbORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultaflor>,s
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Water Sample Identified as PPA
(A Moore County WPCP Project; collected 15 September 2011)=
L Volatile Organics
EPA Method 624
Parameter
Methylene Chloride
71tichlorofluotometl3ane
l,l-DichloroeHxne
1,1-Dicblomethane
Chloroform
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichlompmpane
Trichloroethene
Dribromochloromethane
1,1,2-Trichloroetl me
Temchloroetheae
Chlotobeozate
Trans-L2-Dichloroerhene
1,2-Did 1oroetbane
1,1,1.-Triddomethme
Bromodichlo ourthne
Cia-1,3-Diehloraptopeae
Benzene
Trans-1,3-Dieblomprapene
Brom:oh m
1,1,2,2-Tdrachloradhane
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
chlorometbane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chlotoethane
Tout Xyleoes
Acrolein
Acryloni(rilc
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dilution Factor
l- Miscellaneous
Parameter
Antimony,Total
Arsenic,Total
Betyllium,ToW
Cadnium,Toul
Chmmium,Total
Copper,Tota1
Lead,Tbml
Mercuy,Total •
Nickel,Total
Seleaium,Total
Site ,Total
'Btallium,Tota1
Zine,Total
CYlmide
Phenols
NH-3-N
Nmate
Nitrite
Total Nitrogen
TKN
NO2+No3
Oil & Grease
Pbos,Tot
Dissolved Solids
Hardness
Calcium
Sample Number
Sample Date
Sample Time (lira)
Quantitation PPA
Limit
(MEMO) fmg(LI
0,010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 .BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL,
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0,010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
D.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.100 BQL
0.100 BQL
0.010 SQL
Ouantitation PPA
Limit
(ntrJl.� (u (L)
0.025
0.005
0.0010
0.002
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.0002
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.005
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.050
5.0
0.050
5.0
1.00
0200
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
0.014
BQL
SQL
0.006
SQL
SQL
SQL
0.066
BQL
SQL
SQL
20.2
SQL
222
2.02
20.2
BQL
139
348
115
90.1
712607
09/15/11
0803
in. Semi -volatile Organics
Method 625
btu•
der
4-Chloio-3-u hylphenol
2-Chloropbmol
2,4-Dichloropbenol
2,4-Diuethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methy1-4,6 dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Niuophmol
Peouchlompbenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trich/omphenol
Acenaplttbaw
Acenaphthylene
Aw
Benadine
Benm(a)anthtecene
Bmzo(a)pyrene
Beazo(b)flunrmthene
Beozo(ghi)paylene
Beazo(k)fumanttbare
Benzyl butyl phthalate
Bis(2-ohloroe0nxyhrethane
Bis(2-chlomethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethythexyl)phtbalate
• 443connphrsryl phenyl ether
2-Chlomn hthrde to
4-Chloropheayl phenyl Chr
Claysene
Dbenzo(a,h)mtbracene
1,2-Dichlombenzeae
1,3-Dichlombenmte
1,4-DichlombaIne
3,3-Dichlorobenudinc
Di-N-Butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotolume
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-N-Octyl phthalate
Flunranthene
Hexachkmbmie
Hexacblorobuudiene
Hetachbtocyclopmtadiene
Hexachloroethane
Irrdmo(1,2,3-cd) pyrem
):sophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodimethylamiae
N nitrosodi-n-propylaanne
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phcnant rene
Pyreoe
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Dilution Factor
Sample Number
Sample Date
Sample Time (hrs)
Quantitation PIA
Limit
fmg/t ' fn+NL1
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 , SQL•
0.050 BQL
0.050 BQL
0,010 BQL
0.050 SQL
0.050 SQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.05(1 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
Q010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.020 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 SQL
0:010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 SQL
0.010 BQL
0.010 BQL
712607
09/15/11
0803
BQL = Below Quantitation limits
'AWL = milligrams per Liter = parts pa• mil lion (ppm)

Contact:
Client:
Janna Scherer
Moore County WWTP
1094 AddorRoad
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No.165
Report Date:
Revision Date:
rw .tee-=wFL r. lam, �V
R
L CP L
B. ..
Date Sample Rcvd:
12/14/10
Meritech Work Order #
Parameters
Antimony, total
Arsenic, total
Beryllium, total
Cadmium, total
Calcium, total
Chromium, total
Copper, total
Lead, total
Mercury, total
Nickel, total
Selenium, total
Silver, total
Thallium, total
Zinc, total
Hardness, total
EPA 625 BNA
12141055 Sample: 1214138 Effluent Composite - 12/13-14/10
Result Analysis Date Reporting Limit Method
< 0.025 mg/L '
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.005 mg/L
< 0.002 mg/L
32.8 mg/L
< 0.005 mg/L
0.007 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.0002 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.005 mg/L
< 0.020 mg/L
0.075 mg/L
100 mg eq CaCO3/L
Attached
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
1/5/11
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/15/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/30/10
12/21/10
0.025 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.002 mg/L
0.100 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.002 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.0002 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.020 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
1 mg eq CaCO3/L
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 245.1
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
SM 2340B
Meritech Work Order # 12141056
Parameters
Cyanide, total
Phenols, total
EPA 624 A+A
Trip Blank
Result
< 0.005 mg/L
0.064 mg/L
Attached
Attached
Sample: 1214138 Effluent Grab
Analysis Date Reporting Limit
12/16/10 0.005 mg/L
12/22/10 0.010 mg/L
12/20/10
12/20/10
12/14/10
Method
EPA 335.4
EPA 420.1
I hereby certify that 1 have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

Contact: Janna Scherer
Client: Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Report Date:
n c—,rwc—,ra7
JI
7711
In
Y"66 e it 2011
B Y:
Date Sample Rcvd:
Meritech Work Order # 12141055
Parameters
Antimony, total
Arsenic, total
Beryllium, total
Cadmium, total
Calcium, total
Chromium, total
Copper, total
Lead, total
Mercury, total
Nickel, total
Selenium, total
Silver, total
Thallium, total
Zinc, total
Hardness, total
EPA 625 BNA
pP
Sample: 1214138 Effluent Composite
Result
< 0.025 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.005 mg/L
< 0.002 mg/L
* mg/L
< 0.005 mg/L
0.007 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.0002 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.010 mg/L
< 0.005 mg/L
< 0.020 mg/L
0.075 mg/L
100 mg eq CaCO3/L
Attached
Analysis Date
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/15/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
• 12/22/10
12/22/10
12/22/10
12/30/10
12/21/10
Reporting Limit
0.025 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.002 mg/L
0.100 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.002 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.0002 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
0.005 mg/L
0.020 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
1 mg eq CaCO3/L
12/13-14/10
Method
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 245.1
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
SM 2340B
Meritech Work Order # 12141056
Parameters
Cyanide, total
Phenols, total
EPA 624 A+A
Trip Blank
Result
< 0.005 ing/L
0.064 mg/L
Attached
Attached
Sample 1214138 Effluent Grab
Analysis Date
12/16/10
12/22/10
12/20/10
12/20/10
Reporting Limit
0.005 mg/L
0.010 mg/L
12/14/10
Method
EPA 335.4
EPA 420.1
* Will forward upon completion.
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
-2Q,0(
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco. Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene -
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
.Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
B is(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene -
Di-n-octyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
PPA
Effluent 1214138
12/14/10
Meritech ID#: 12141055
Analysis: 12/21/10
Extraction: 12/14/10
Analyst: MC
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Result
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
< 10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Parameter
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
p-Chloro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Result
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
624 PPA
Trip Blank
12/14/10
Meritech ID#:
Analysis:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter - Result
Benzene < 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane < 1.00 ug/L
Bromoform < 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide < 5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride < 1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
Chloroethane < 5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether < 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform < 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Chloride <5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane < 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene < 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene < 1.00 ug/L
1.00''
Ethyl benzene. � u ��'-'
Methylene chloride • < 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
Toluene < 1.00 ug/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethane < 5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride < 5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
Acrolein <50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrile <10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
12141056tb
12/20/10
VWV
ge
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Moore County WWTP
624 PPA
Effluent 1214152
12/14/10
Meritech ID#:
Analysis:
Analyst:
Dilution Factor:
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter Result
Benzene < 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane <1.00 ug/L
Bromoform <1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide <5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride <1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
Chloroethane < 5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether < 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform < 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Chloride < 5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane <1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane < 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene < 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane < 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene < 1.00, ug/L
trans-1;3-Dichloropropylene < 1.00 ug/L
Ethyl benzene < 1.00 ugiL
Methylene chloride < 1.00 ug/L
1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachl oroethane < 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
Toluene < 1.00 ug/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene < 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethane < 5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride < 5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
<50.0 ug/L
<10.0 ug/L
12141056
12/20/10
VWV
1
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

4•
ADDENDUM 1
NPDES PERMIT #NC0037508
REQUEST FOR RENEWAL
January 10, 2014
Sludge Management Plan:
The Sludge Management Plan for the Moore County Water Pollution Control Plant
consists of two items:
1. Disposal of Sludge as compost from 2006 to the end of 2013. Compost ultimately
was distributed as a soil amendment.
2. Disposal of Sludge at Anson County Landfill starting December 2013.
The Land Application permit (Permit #WQ0018018) was rescinded January 2006. The
permit was never used.
If you have any questions concerning our Sludge Management Plan, please do not
hesitate to contact George Yankay at [phone].

RESEARCIi ail ANAIyTicAI
LAbORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
January 22, 2014
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAL Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury *
Identification Number Date Time (ng/L)
Upstream 776308 12/31/13 1245 1.27
Field Blank
776309 12/31/13 1247 1.23
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

RESEARCII & ANAIyTICA[
LABORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
December 17, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Sample
Identification
Upstream
Field Blank
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAL
Sample Sample
Number Date
773897 11/21/13 1335
773898 11/21/13 1337
Sample
Time
,Low Level
Mercury •*
(nulL)
<0.500
<0.500
BY: o__----
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per. Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

RESEARCH & ANA(yTICAL
LAbORATORI'ES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
November 20, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
1
SS! 9
di i.)
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAL Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury
Identification Number Date Time (n&L)
Upstream 772027 10/31/13 1435 <0.500
Field Blank 772026 10/31/13 1000 0.990
= Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

RESEARCH & ANALyTi.CA1
LAbORATORIES,_ INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
October 21, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Low Level Mercury. Analysis
RAL Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury *
Identification Number Date . Time (ng/L)
Effluent 769511 .09/30/13 1110 . 2.34
Fie1d;B1ank 769512 09/30/13 , 1115 0.700
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter. < = Less than or below detection limit

RESEARCh & ANALyTICAL
LABORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
September 23, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 283.15
Attention: Janna Scherer
Low Level Mercury Analysis
•�v.
•
r.r.ra 2 6 20,13
BY: --- ----
RAT Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury
Identification Number Date Time (n2/L)
Effluent 767177 08/28/13 1508 1.57
Field Blank 767178 08/28/13 1505 <0.500
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

RESEARCk & ANALyTICAL
e
LABORATORIES, INCe
Analytical/Process Consultations
August 23, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
AUGimcmawmr-1
la 2 7 2013 LI
B Y:
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAL Low Level
Sample Sample Sample. Sample Mercury *
Identification Number Date Time (n2/L)
Effluent 764742 07/26/13 1245 1.60
Field Blank 764743 07/26/13 . 1248 1.20
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below. detection limit

RESEARCI1 & ANALyTicAL
LABORATORIES, INC°
Analytical/Process Consultations
July 24, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAL Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury *
Identification Number Date Time (ns/L)
Effluent 762035 06/28/13 1545 2.81
Field Blank 762036 06/28/13 1548 <0.500
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW, Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

RESEARCH C ANALyTkAL
LAbORATORiES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
June 14, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAT . Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury
Identification Number Date Time ingLIL
Upstream 759449 05/29/13 1425 1.55
Field Blank 759450 05/29/13 1430 <0.500
T = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

RESEARCII & ANALyTiCAL
LAbORATORIESF INCe
Analytical/Process Consultations
April 17, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road.
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAL Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury *
Identification Number Date Time . (u /L)
Effluent 754863 03/28/13 1430 1.44
Field Blank 754864 03/28/13 1427 1.00
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

,����llttifl���• +
RESEARCIi & ANAlyTiCAl ,,,.� `.' •••..
LAboI To(t1E5 INC.- °`f° NC#34 = =
s
sli 1
Analytical/Process Consultations •.oigE�c '
A.
-4,11100-
April 25, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAL Low Level
Sample Sample . Sample Sample - Mercury. *
Identification Number Date Time (ns/L)
Upstream . 752798 02/28/13 1435 1.49
Field Blank
752799 02/28/13 .1430 <0.500
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW.Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = -Less than or below detection limit

R ESEARCII & ANALYTICAL
L.AbORATORiESF INC. �,�,�,���
Analytical/Process Consultations g C METE
V `-
' "1 f -..: 7 I V
February 11, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
BY:------------- ------
Low Level Mercury Analysis
IRAL Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury *
Identification Number Date Time (na/L)
Upstream 748599 01/10/13 1355 0.320
Field Blank 748600 01/10/13 <0.5
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

ossiumieta
RESEARCH &. ANALyTICAL _ �� sote.4 -044 $
fU cV
LAbORATORIES, INC. ! b o
� NC ZSips
v
Analytical/Process Consultations 4
1
,y,.•�
January 29, 2013
Moore County WWTP
1094 Addor Road
Aberdeen, NC 28315
Attention: Janna Scherer
Low Level Mercury Analysis
RAL Low Level
Sample Sample Sample Sample Mercury *
Identification Number Date - Time (ng/L)
Upstream
748198 12/20/12 1400 <0.5
Field Blank 748199 12/20/12 <0.5
* = Sample analyzed by Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. (NC WW Cert#39705)
ng/L = nanograms per Liter < = Less than or below detection limit

i#r