The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 AUDIT REPORT_20210604MUNICIPAL SEPARATE PROGRAM AUDIT REPORT Mount Holly, NORTH CAROLINA 400 East Central Avenue, Mount Holly, North Carolina 28120 Audit Date: May 24, 2021 Report Date: June 4, 2021 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Energy, Mineral & Land Resources Stormwater Program 512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th floor 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (This page intentionally left blank) NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 AuditDetails..................................................................................................................................................1 PermitteeInformation..................................................................................................................................2 Listof Supporting Documents.......................................................................................................................3 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment...........................................................................4 PublicEducation and Outreach.....................................................................................................................7 Public Involvement and Participation...........................................................................................................8 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)........................................................................................9 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations..................................................11 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1.............................................................................................13 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 2.............................................................................................15 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 3.............................................................................................17 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1......................................................................................................19 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No.1............................................21 DISCLAIMER This audit consists of an evaluation of program compliance with the issued permit and implementation of the approved Stormwater Management Plan. This audit report does not include a review of all program components, and program deficiencies in addition to those noted may be present. The permittee is required to assess program progress and permit compliance, and to implement the approved Stormwater Management Plan in accordance with the issued permit. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 ii This page intentionally left blank NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Audit ID Number: Audit Date(s): NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 May 24-25, 2021 Minimum Control Measures Evaluated: ® Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment M Public Education & Outreach-- - - ® Public Involvement & Participation ® Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination ❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls - No delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program ❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls - Delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program ❑ Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls ® Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations ❑ Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Field Site Visits: ® Municipal Facilities. Number visited: 3 M MS4 Outfalls. Number visited: 1 ❑ Construction Sites. Number visited: Choose an item. ® Post -Construction Stormwater Runoff Controls. Number visited: 1 ❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an item. ❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an item. Jesse McDonnell, Environmental Specialist I North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Christopher Graybeal, Assistant Regional Engineer I North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Audit Report Author: Jesse McDonnell Signature � �%1% Audit Report- A ttor: Christopher Cgraybeal Date: Date: June 4, 2021 June 4, 2021 NCS000407-Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 1 of 22 'M �� N vi 1-0 =--- -M-1 MS4 Permittee Name: Permit Effective Date: Permit Expiration Date: Town of Mount Holly February 2017 February 2022 Mailing Address: Date of Last MS4 Inspection/Audit: P.O Box 406, Mount Holly, North Carolina 28120 June 5, 2012 Co-permittee(s), if applicable: Permit Owner of Record: Miles Braswell, City Manager; Robert Whitt, Mayor, Co -Owner; David Johnson, Utilities Director, Signature authority David Johnson, Utilities Director City of Mount Holly Kimberly Sturgis, Stormwater Coordinator City of Mount Holly Derek Dixon, Site Inspector City of Mount Holly - 'f"�yw. �s- ,F € �.s.. £ -":: Taylors Creek WS-IV None Known Fites Creek WS-1V None Known Dutchman's Creek WS-IV Turbidity Stanley Creek WS-IV None Known South Stanley Creek WS-IV None Known NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 2 of 22 NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 3 of 22 Kimberly Sturgis, Stormwater Coordinator David Johnson, Utilities Director Derek Dixon, Site inspector The permittee maintained adequate funding and staffing to implement and manage _ No --- the provisions of the Stormwater Plan and meet all requirements of the permit. K The Stormwater Plan identifies a specific position(s) responsible for the overall coordination, implementation, and revision to the Plan. ;- Responsibilities for all components of the Stormwater Plan are documented and position(s) assignments provided. x" The permittee is current on payment of invoiced administering and compliance a W. monitoring fees (see stormwater e- a ments on DEMLR MS4 web a e). Yes BIMS �� Comments: The City currently has a small stormwater fee of $2.50/Residential Equivalent Unit (ERU)/month. Based on the audit, funding is not sufficient for this program. The City does not have a current Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). The City was operating under the 2010-2015 SWMP. The stormwater fee is up to date with no balance due. The permittee evaluated the performance and effectiveness of the program _ components at least annually. If es, the permittee used the results of the evaluation to modify the program Y p fy p g Not t components as necessary to accomplish the intent of the Stormwater Program. applicable --- Did the permitted MS4 discharges cause or contribute to non attainment of an No applicable water quality standard? --- �¢. If yes, did the permittee expand or better tailor its BMPs accordingly to address Not the non -attainment? Applicable Comments: No documentation. The permittee kept the Stormwater Plan up to date. No --- The permittee notified DEMLR of any updates to the Stormwater Plan. No -- Comments: The City did not maintain the SWMP. The most recent SWMP is from 2015. No SWMP was in effect during this permit cycle. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 4 of 22 fv M`M- , — �� =� The permittee kept an up-to-date version of its Stormwater Plan available to the ___ No � Division and the, public online. The online materials included ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, or a list identifying the ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, providing the legal Yes 2 moo. -authority necessary to implement and enforce the -requirements -of -the permit. Comments: The City does not have the SWMP available on the webpage. The ordinances for legal authority are on the website. Wfipf Did DEMLR require a modification to the Stornwater Plan? No --- If yes, did the permittee complete the modifications in accordance with the Not established deadline? Applicable f Comments: No modifications were required by DEMLR. Ill~ A,� �arir�g Cs'porbtli Are any control measures implemented by an entity other than the permittee? Yes 1 If yes, is there a written agreement in place? Yes 1 Comments: Gaston County Natural Resources performs erosion control inspections for the county. The permittee maintained written procedures for implementing the six minimum control measures. No --- Written procedures identified specific action steps, schedules, resources and No responsibilities for implementing the six minimum measures. Comments: No documentation. IIiE A;_ The permittee maintained documentation of all program components including, but �1r0 rim not limited to, inspections, maintenance activities, educational programs, No --- flY�lfi;i#1ttt implementation of BMPs, enforcement actions etc., on file for a period of five years. Comments: No documentation. 1( The permittee submitted annual reports to the Department witrtftu(tt tttQli 1 ttct 8 #t�pt NO (See Section 111.B. for the annual reporting No --- rnlifi period specific to this MS4). The permittee submitted subsequent annual reports every twelve months from the f scheduled date of the first annual report submittal. Yes . Laserfiche The Annual Reports included appropriate information to accurately describe the progress, status, and results of the permittee's Stormwater Plan, including, but not limited the following: 1. A detailed description of the status of implementation of the Stormwater Plan as a whole. This will include information on development and implementation Not of each major component of the Stormwater Plan for the past year and Reviewed _ - schedules and plans for the year following each report. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 5 of 22 u_ _MR MM 2. An adequate description and justification of any proposed changes to the Stormwater Plan. This will include descriptions and supporting information for Not _ the proposed changes and how these changes will impact the Stormwater Reviewed Plan (results, effectiveness, implementation schedule, etc.). 3. Documentation of any necessary changes to programs or practices for ., .- assessment of management measures implemented through the Stormwater Not Plan. Reviewed 4. A summary of data accumulated as part of the Stormwater Plan throughout the year along with an assessment of what the data indicates in light of the Not --- Reviewed Stormwater Plan. 5. An assessment of compliance with the permit, information on the Not establishment of appropriate legal authorities, inspections, and enforcement -�- Reviewed actions. �t#20 Annual reports are within Laserfiche. The Annual Reports document the following: 1. A summary of past year activities, including where applicable, specific Not quantities achieved and summaries of enforcement actions. Reviewed 2. A description of the effectiveness of each program component. Not --- Reviewed for for 3. Planned activities and changes the next reporting period, each Not program component activity. gram p or Y Reviewed Not 4. Fiscal analysis. Reviewed Comments: Not Reviewed during this audit. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 6 of 22 r Kimberly Sturgis, Stormwater Coordinator David Johnson, Utilities Director Derek Dixon, Site inspector The permittee defined goals and objectives of the Local Public Education and No --- Outreach Program based on community wide issues. Comments: No documentation. IV The permittee maintained a description of the target pollutants and/or stressors and r�tlufh likely sources. No --- Comments: The City did not maintain a description of target pollutants and/or stressors. 11 The permittee identified, assessed annually and updated the description of the target %rg Ades audiences likely to have significant storm water impacts and why they were selected. No --- r._ Comments: No documentation of annual assessment or updating. h liedrjtta The permittee described issues, such as pollutants, the likely sources of those c �i> dt� itla f pollutants, potential impacts, and the physical attributes of stormwater runoff in No --- [er+Lsus ° their education/outreach program. Comments: No documentation. IiB The permittee promoted and maintained an internet web site designed to convey the �tl3C>�itt4#ts Yes 2 program's message. Comments: The City maintained an internet website with public education and outreach materials. The website is published in all stormwater educational documents. The permittee distributed stormwater educational material to appropriate target No --- groups. Comments: No documentation. The permittee promoted and maintained a stormwater hotline/helpline for the Yes 2 purpose of public education and outreach. Comments: The City maintained a hotline on the website for the purpose of Public Education and Outreach. i The permittee's outreach program, including those elements implemented locally or '� Idin through a cooperative agreement, included a combination of approaches designed to Partial 2 ittt = reach the target audiences. For each media, event or activity, including those elements implemented locally or f through a cooperative agreement the permittee estimated and recorded the extent No --- x x of exposure. Comments: The City maintained the website and Facebook page. No.documentation for extent of exposure. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 7 of 22 Kimberly Sturgis, Stormwater Coordinator David Johnson, Utilities Director Derek Dixon, Site inspector The permittee included and promoted volunteer opportunities designed to promote No -- ongoing citizen participation. Comments: No documentation. The permittee provided and promoted a mechanism for public involvement that No --- provides for input on stormwater issues and the stormwater program. Comments: The City maintained a Stormwater Committee made of citizens. No documentation of frequency or topics of meetings. The permittee promoted and maintained a hotline/helpline forthe purpose of public involvement and participation. Yes 2 Comments: The City maintained a hotline on the website for the purpose of Public Involvement and Participation. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 8 of 22 Kimberly Sturgis, Stormwater Coordinator David Johnson, Utilities Director Derek Dixon, Site inspector _ - = WME M - ME Emil MINE-I MI MEMO 1 ��_, - ?lcl?rt The permittee maintained a written IDDE Program. No --- If yes, the written program includes provisions for program assessment and Not r evaluation and integrating program. applicable Comments: No documentation. The permittee maintained an IDDE ordinance or other regulatory mechanism(s) that Yes 3 provides the legal authority to prohibit illicit connections and discharges to the MS4. ` If yes, the ordinance applies throughout the corporate limits of the permittee. Yes 3 (Permit Part I.D) Comments: The City has maintained an IDDE Ordinance since 2006 within the City limits. The permittee maintained a current map showing major outfalls and receiving tt?Frtf Sete Yes 5 streams. �yst�r�t Nr� Comments: The City has maintained a map with all major outfalls. # The permittee maintained a program for conducting dry weather flow field CllW No --- .A observations in accordance with written procedures. Prcaghan� . Comments: No documentation of dry weather flow program being maintained. The permittee maintained written procedures for conducting investigations of ll> din Partial 7 s identified illicit discharges. Comments: The City has a list of procedures for conducting an IDDE investigation. l [t For each case of an illicit discharge or potential illicit discharge, the permittee documented and tracked the TCaCkllhd following: 1. The date(s) the illicit discharge was observed Yes 7 3� - 2. The results of the investigation Yes 7 J 3. Any follow-up of the investigation Yes 7 4. The date the investigation was closed Yes 7 Comments: The City has an IDDE response sheet that documents all aspects of the IDDE investigation. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 9 of 22 r� The permittee implemented and documented a training program for appropriate municipal staff who, as part of their normal job responsibilities, may come into Partial 4 contact with or otherwise observe an illicit discharge or illicit connection. Comments: Only training records are from 2019 and 2020. The permittee informed public employees of hazards associated with illegal �S discharges and improper disposal of waste. Partial 4 The permittee informed businesses of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. No --- y The permittee informed the general public of hazards associated with illegal No --- discharges and improper disposal of waste. Comments: annual training was conducted for employees, only two years have documented training. No documentation for educational materials being delivered to businesses or the general public. I [! = x The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for the g Partial 2 public to report illicit discharges. The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for staff r to report illicit discharges. Partial 2 s f The permittee established and implemented response procedures for citizen No --- requests/reports. Comments: The City maintained a hotline for the public and staff to call to report an illicit discharge. No documentation of written procedures when a report is received. _. The permittee implemented a mechanism to track the issuance of notices of violation Hilt �t)1��4 and enforcement actions administered by the permittee. No --- l If yes, the mechanism includes the ability to identify chronic violators for No --- initiation of actions to reduce noncompliance. Comments: The City tracked all IDDE reports/complaints within a spreadsheet. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 10 of 22 ig:gn Kimberly Sturgis, Stormwater Coordinator David Johnson, Utilities Director Y� Derek Dixon, Site inspector w The permittee maintained a current inventory of facilities and operations owned ti. innti and operated by the permittee with the potential for generating polluted Yes 5 stormwater runoff. Comments: The City maintained a map of all municipally owned facilities. The facilities with potential to pollute need to be identified on a separate list within the map. t4x�"JP The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally t)�irtc��iTtc owned and operated facilities with the potential for generating polluted No --- 1[t1M>elta{C?8c11`; stormwater runoff. fir FIcilitis If yes, the 0&M program specifies the frequency of inspections. Not - Applicable If yes, the 0&M program specifies the frequency of routine maintenance.Not requirements. Applicable If yes, the permittee evaluated the 0&M program annually and updated it as Not necessary. Applicable _ Comments: No documentation. IiI.G.2 C Spit Fiepanss The permittee had written spill response procedures for municipal operations. No --- Comments: No documentation. lF�3 #f tCts� The permittee evaluated existing and new BMPs that reduce polluted stormwater I�oadS�bi runoff from municipally -owned streets, roads, and public parking lots within its Partial 6 PttiCll4� . corporate limits annually. Ma>3ente If yes, the permittee evaluated the effectiveness of existing and new BMPs Partial 6 based on cost and the estimated quantity of pollutants removed. Comments: The City maintained a street sweeping schedule downtown and for problematic areas. The hours the sweeper was run each week is recorded. The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for the stormwater sewer system including catch basins and conveyance systems that it owns and No --- Conv�yat!sce Syst�ni�s maintains. Comments: No documentation of written O&M program for conveyances. ( The permittee maintained a current inventory of municipally -owned or operated Sti Uctucat = structural stormwater controls installed for compliance with the permittee's post- Yes 5 tsv;ronts=: construction ordinance. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 11 of 22 Comments: The City maintained a map of all municipally owned facilities. The facilities with potential to pollute need to be identified on a separate list within the map. The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally - owned or maintained structural stormwater controls installed for compliance with No -- the permittee spost-construction-ordinai4ee. If yes,`then: - The O&M program specified the frequency of inspections and routine Not maintenance requirements. Applicable. a. The permittee documented inspections of all municipally -owned or maintained Not structural stormwater controls. Applicable The permittee inspected all municipally -owned or maintained structural in developed by Not Applicable stormwater controls accordance with the schedule permittee. 04 all The permittee maintained municipally -owned or maintained structural Not Applicable - - stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee. The permittee documented maintenance of all municipally -owned or Not maintained structural stormwater controls. Applicable _ Comments: No documentation of O&M program. Inspections have been conducted on a routine basis. The permittee ensured municipal employees are properly trained in pesticide, Yes $ herbicide and fertilizer application management. F The permittee ensured contractors are properly trained in pesticide, herbicide and Not fertilizer application management. Applicable --- The ensured all certifications, and other measures for . 45R permittee permits p p Yes8. applicators are followed. Comments: The City has three employees who are certified pesticide/herbicide applicators. The permittee implemented an employee training program for employees involved 4 in implementing prevention and good housekeeping practices. Partial pollution Comments: The City has trainings for 2019 and 2020. The permittee described and implemented measures that prevent or minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle and equipment No --- cleaning. Comments: No Documentation. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 12 of 22 s� Facility Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: City of Mount Holly Public Works May 25, 2021 at 9:00 am Facility Address: Facility Type (Vehicle Maintenance, Landscaping, etc.): 218 Adrian St. Vehicle and equipment maintenance and storage Mount Holly, NC 28120 Name of MS4 inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Inspection (List date and name of inspector): Derek Dixon None a t(e(s ,r:f a it t r #Iep esen e x resent f air t x � r Name Title Facility Manager t r�u - Does the facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it facility -specific? No, the facility does not have a SWPPP. What type of stormwater training do facility employees receive? How often? Staff receive the illicit discharge and spill response training annually. rl pectin, rainIr#gl nowi dge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? The inspector has no MS4 specific training. Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about Permit requirements for pollution prevention and good housekeeping? No, the facility has been operating without a State Stormwater Permit. Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Yes. f��spett�on poce��xes � , - . Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the facility's SWPPP (or similar document)? Not applicable. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 13 of 22 Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire facility and inspecting all points of discharge? Yes. Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious areas of concern? If so, explain: No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the facility contact? Yes, the facility contact walked the site during the inspection. Did the facility inspection result in any corrective actions to be implemented? If so, for what issues)? Yes, the facility will need to apply for a State Stormwater Permit. The general permit number will be NCG080000 due to vehicle maintenance. If compliance corrective actions were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? The facility needs to apply for coverage under NCG080000 as soon as possible. ��#�S�f��tie#itfil��C�ttrflrtt+I�#1dti�k15 This facility inspection became a technical assistance inspection to educate the City about the proper procedures and processes that should be used during an inspection. - NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 14 of 22 W� Facility Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: City of Mount Holly Waste Water Treatment Plan (WWTP) May 25, 2021 at 10:00 am Facility Address: Facility Type (Vehicle Maintenance, Landscaping, etc.): 201 Broome St. Waste Water Treatment Mount Holly, NC 28120 Name of MS4 inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Inspection (Date and Entity): Derek Dixson None omm Name Title Doug Facility Supervisor - - r r r [� OWAMmn r fail iniig ifoEurYi�iIt:r Does the facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it facility -specific? Yes. What type of stormwater training do facility employees receive? How often? The facility staff receive spill prevention and response and IDDE identification training annually. Inspecttor Tr�ln�ng/Knor�rledge . , r - What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? None. Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about Permit requirements for pollution prevention and good housekeeping? No. Did the M54 inspector appear knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Yes. In�ss #rocecl Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the facility's SWPPP (or similar document)? No. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 15 of 22 ON- 01M Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire facility and inspecting all points of discharge? Yes. Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious areas of concern? If so, explain: No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the facility contact? Yes, the facility supervisor inspected the site along with the MS4 inspector. X Did the facility inspection result in any corrective actions to be implemented? If so, for what issue(s)? It is recommended to construct secondary containment around totes that are not inside or under cover. If compliance corrective actions were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? No timeline was provided to have the repairs corrected. J v This facility inspection became a technical assistance inspection to educate the City about the proper procedures and processes that should be used during an inspection. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 16 of 22 Facility Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: City of Mount Holly Fire Department May 25, 2021 at 11:00 am Facility Address: Facility Type (Vehicle Maintenance, Landscaping, etc.): 433 Killian Ave Fire Department Mount Holly, NC 28120 Name of MS4 inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Inspection (List date and name of inspector): Derek Dixson None � Name Title s Does the facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it facility -specific? No, the facility does not require a SWPPP. What type of stormwater training do facility employees receive? How often? The staff receive spill response training and IDDE training annually. lnspect�r iratr��ng/Kn�owle�#ge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? None. Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about Permit requirements for pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Not applicable. Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Yes. IT1S �G�lilrf Protedu�es � f Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the facility's SWPPP (or similar document)? Not applicable. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 17 of 22 Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire facility and inspecting all points of discharge? Yes. Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious areas of concern? If so, explain: No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the facility contact? Yes. Did the facility inspection result inanycorrective actions to be implemented? If so, for what-issue(s)? No. If`compliance corrective actions were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? Not applicable. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 18 of 22 Outfall ID Number: Date and Time of Site Visit: Woodland Avenue Outfall May 25, 2021 at 11:30 Outfall Location: Outfall Description (Pipe Material/Diameter, Culvert, etc.): 300 Woodland Avenue 36" RCP Mount Holly, NC 28120 Receiving Water: Is Flow Present? If So, Describe (Color, Approximate Flow Rate, Dutchman's Creek Sheen, Odor, Floatables/Debris, etc.): No flow at the time of the inspection. Most Recent Outfall Inspection/Screening (Date): Unknown j I Days Since Last Rainfall: Inches: 13 0.25 Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated: Derek Dixson Inspector Tra�n�r�gJl�r�o�Il�dge f - What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? None. Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about illicit discharge indicators and investigations? Yes. Does the inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? Yes. Does the inspector's process include taking photos? Yes. Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious potential illicit discharge indicators or maintenance issues? If so, what were they? No, this outfall recently had maintenance preformed. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 19 of 22 NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 20 of 22 CON Site Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: Tuckaseege Park Wetland May 25, 2021 at 10:40 am Site Address: SCM Type: 165 Broome St. Engineered Wetland Mount Holly, NC 28120 _. Most Recent MS4 Inspection (Include Date and Entity): None Name of M54 Inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Enforcement Activity (Include Date): Derek Dixson None ae{sin `1 +►##5n�lft ar�Et3 y ` 3 Name Title - $ftt'QCUl�111atlt3n Does the site have an operation and maintenance plan? Yes. Does the site have records of annual inspections? Are they performed by a qualified individual? Yes. insegt,�r,'I~r��in��gj��►�a�ee What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? None. Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about MS4 requirements for post -construction site runoff controls? Yes. Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about post -construction BMPs (general purpose/function, components, O&M requirements, etc.)? Yes. tnpclElon Proc�duc�s f Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? What format? Yes. Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? Yes. Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the site's operation and maintenance plan and records of annual inspections? No. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 21 of 22 Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire site and inspecting all points of discharge? Yes. Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious operation and maintenance deficiencies? If so, explain: No. Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the site contact in writing? No. 10 (iancfnrnet r What, if any, enforcement actions (verbal warnings, NOV, etc.) did the inspection result in? No actions. If compliance issues were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? Not applicable. NCS000407_Mount Holly MS4 Audit_20210524 Page 22 of 22