090152_Compliance Inspection_20210608

/10-Y1‘)
Facility Number
/5:2-
Type of Visit:-l1Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ,'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
6,/c/b-(
Owner Name:
Arrival Time:
c,1
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
&444-1-,/ vawed,
eparture Time: /0 ` / Coun
Owner Email:
Phone:
Region: 16.)
ENTERED TO
LASERFICHE
JUN 11 2021
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
7,6/
//
/2
Latitude:
PhonMEC7/DWR woRnR
FAYE7 VILE ' E IOi L PEKE
Integrator:,
Certification Number: / % Qs-6
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design'...Current
Capacity P©p.
Wean to Finish
W
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Design, Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop,
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
D Poultr Ca s aci Po
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes 1:g4\lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes , "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

!Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
ict
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1
Observed Freeboard (in): .3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
O Yes ,Er No ❑ NA 0 NE
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes, No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes T,12'No ❑ NA 0 NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 06a,/,W i i / _ O
13. Soil Type(s): ay.-az:Ay. iekeite-eid
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
O Yes
O Yes
O Yes
.0—No
D No
/ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NA
0 NA
.,,.❑'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes _o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes . ❑'"No ❑ NA 0 NE
O Yes „allo 0 NA 0 NE
O NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
El Yes ONo 0 NA 0 NE
O Yes 42'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes'No 0 NA 0 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists 0 Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,allo 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking 0 Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes -[JNo ❑ NA 0 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes &No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

[facility Number: 0� 1 !Date of Inspection: � �d-j1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ./ETNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZNo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA
❑ NA
O NE
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes , 'No
❑ Yes \lo
❑ Yes „ON()
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
o
12'No
z'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
O NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA
O NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
O NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recon
ings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages s,pecessary).
0'7 5474- £'&ze (2,1-eaut, ter, top --(5 ��y,,.�n &k.k
1-camci bec/v eietz441
comments.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone(94 3 • Q-7
Date: /'/x,-
2/4/2015

FACILITY #: /
FARM NAME:
FREEBOARD I 1 ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS - EXPERIATION DATE �` 3! .� NUMBER OF ANIMALS c-laeb
- ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL C�
- OIC CARDN',S OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
•� f3dt'SOIL TYPES *J>-V
CROP TYPES �,cr .d ; 0 44a K? / P
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOUL HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
ODOR CONTROL CHECK (ST S R NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 6 /' d-I NITROGEN LEVEL
EVERY 3 YEARS:
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or Tess)
SOIL REPORT (#21)
DATE
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
ZONE ACRES.
l4
ZN d-e/6
IRR2 (#21)
PAN ) ► ( CROP TYPE44,n—t-thOeut
FLOW RATES /Ca NITROGEN (N) ,/5-
120 Min inspection initialed ! Weather Codes L/
Commercial Fertilizer ✓ Chicken Litter i/
CALBRIATION (#24)

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS CL�coDiaq
FLOW RATES ‘keCl
RAI FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT d/
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
S�UDGE (#21 & 25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE tQ tol2
0: it k P: 0,•Lt % RATIO OF SLUDGE 'f t?
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS ` MORTALITY
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE