20210699 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210610

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver4.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20210699 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
✓ Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson 1
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
StoneyGreen Subdivision
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Rich Mogensen
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
6/10/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Reedy Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.2531
Longitude:
-80.6922
1 c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information
u
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes r No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
✓ Yes r No

ID#
20210699
Version
1
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
4/6/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Pre -Filing Meeting Request.pdf
Fle type nest be FIT
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
rJ Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r" Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
✓ No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
17 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
I-- Regional General Permit (RGP)
I-- Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
✓ Yes rNo
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
17 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
I— Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
I-- Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes f No
55.45KB
I— 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
I— Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes 6 No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes 6 No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes f No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
I Owner 17 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
6 Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
JDSI, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
04196-537
✓ Yesr No
✓ Yes 6 No
2c. Contact Person:
Judson Stringfellow

2d.Address
Street Address
2116 Crown Centre Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 200
aty State / Province / Isgion
Charlotte NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28277 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
David Hensley
3b. Business Name:
SouthCraft Development
3c. Address
Street Address
2116 Crown Centre Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 200
DIY
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28277
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Rich Mogensen
4b. Business Name:
Mogensen Mitigation
4c. Address
Street Address
PO Box690429
Address Line 2
aty
Charlotte
Postal / Zip (ode
28227
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification

2a. Property Identification Number:
10812119, 10812101A
2b. Property size:
39.33
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Hood Road
Address tine 2
Criy State / Province / legion
Postal / Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Reedy Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
c
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
03040105
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is located just west of Hood Road, south of Plaza Road Extension in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC. This site is partially forested with areas of overgrown pasture and a
private estate.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes C• No C- Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.627
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
3575
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The proposed residential development consists of one road crossing.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
6 Yes C- No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
6' Preliminary C- Approved F Not Verified F Unknown C- WA
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-01101
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Rich Mogensen
SynTerra
r Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
This site was verified by D. Shaeffer (USACE) on 2/3/20. A copy of the signed JD approval is included in the Approvals section. Please note, between the JD and PCN, discrepancies in
stream and wetland measurements are the result of including Reedy Creek as the southern boundary.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
C Yes /7 No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands
r Open Waters
3. Stream Impacts
fJ Streams -tributaries
✓ Pond Construction
r Buffers
SI
3a. Reason for impact (?)
Road Crossing
3b.Impact type*
Permanent
3c. Type of impact*
Culvert
3d. S. name*
Stream (S-1)
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
Intermittent
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
Corps
3g. S. width*
17
Average (feet)
3h. Impact
length*
107
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
107
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
107
3j. Comments:
Riprap will be placed above the OHWM. Total acreage of the impact is <0.05 acres.
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization efforts by dedicating significant area as tree saves and avoiding -100%
of onsite wetlands and 97% of streams.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2:1 slopes will be used to minimize crossing impacts and riprap will be placed above the OHWM.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
✓ Yes ( No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts total to less than 0.05 AC
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
✓ Yes 6No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes (' No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
✓ Yes ( No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
6' Yes r No
✓ N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
(7 Local Government r State

Local Government Stormwater Programs
I7 Phase II r NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Charlotte
Comments:
Stormwater on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to City of Charlotte but will be designed to meet their
criteria.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
✓ Yes GNo
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes F No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes f No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r: Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes f. No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
✓ Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes G No
t No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
✓ Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes ( No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes G No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
No suitable habitat present. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared bat but the project is except as described in the attached Spangler T&E
report. The report has been submitted for concurrence.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*

C Yes ( No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
C Yes 6- No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
https://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
NC Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
6 Yes CNo
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMArequirements:
Impacts to floodplain are being coordinated with local FEMA floodplain managers and a Individual Floodplain Development Permit has been submitted
via Charlotte -Mecklenburg Stormwater Services.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
ewwv.fema.gov
https://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one
file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upbad button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
StoneyGreene PCN.pdf 11 57MB
Fie must be FCF or NW
Comments
Please see attached for a complete PCN package, including maps, exhibits, and supplementary materials.
Signature
*
17 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Richard Mogensen
Signature
Date
6/10/2021

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20210699
Version*
1
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Alan Johnson
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 4/6/2021
Contact Name*
Contact Email Address*
Project Name*
Project Owner*
Project County*
Owner Address:
Amber Lipsky
[e-mail]
StoneyGreen Subdivision
SouthCraft Development
Mecklenburg
Street Address
2116 Crown Centre Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 200
City
Charlotte
Fbstal / Zip Code
28277
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes ( No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular
I— Individual Permit
I— Shoreline Stabilization
I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Express
I— Modification
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes ( No
State / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
USA
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
The proposed NWP 29 will include one stream crossing
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.

5/6/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
STONEY GREEN_ STREAM
DISTURBANCE.pdf
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• !also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 4/6/2021

June 10, 2021
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: SAW-2019-01101; Pre -Construction Notification for NWP #29 for the StoneyGreen
Subdivision site in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Mr. Roden -Reynolds and Mr. Johnson,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit #29 for the StoneyGreen Subdivision site on 39.33 acres
located on Hood Road in Charlotte, NC. The site is a proposed residential development and consists of
three streams and three wetlands. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request was authorized in
February 2020. Please refer to the Jurisdictional Determination Information and Authorizations sections
for information on onsite surface waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include 107 linear feet of permanent
impacts to one stream (Stream S-1) for road crossing access. These access crossings were necessary due
to City connectivity requirements. Impacts were limited to the extent possible by implementing 2:1
slopes and avoiding all other aquatic resources on site. Due to the limited impacts, no compensatory
mitigation is proposed.
Also enclosed is a copy of a Threatened and Endangered Species and Cultural Resources Evaluation for
the site. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional details
on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact me with any
questions, at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Richard Mogensen, PWS
1

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20210699
Version*
1
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Alan Johnson
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 4/6/2021
Contact Name*
Contact Email Address*
Project Name*
Project Owner*
Project County*
Owner Address:
Amber Lipsky
[e-mail]
StoneyGreen Subdivision
SouthCraft Development
Mecklenburg
Street Address
2116 Crown Centre Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 200
City
Charlotte
Fbstal / Zip Code
28277
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes ( No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular
I— Individual Permit
I— Shoreline Stabilization
I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Express
I— Modification
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes ( No
State / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
USA
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
The proposed NWP 29 will include one stream crossing
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.

5/6/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
STONEY GREEN_ STREAM
DISTURBANCE.pdf
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• !also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 4/6/2021

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 2019 - 01101
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Lindner, PLLC.
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder n Assign Action ID Number in ORM n
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: StoneyGreen Subdivision
2. Work Type: Private n Institutional n Government n Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
PCN request for residential development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: South Craft Development (Applicant)
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: WEPG, PLLC c/o Daniel Kuefler
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Bib]:
35.2531. -80.6922
Hood Road, Charlotte, NC
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 10812101A, 10812101 B
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Reedy Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:Yadkin PeeDee (03040105)
Authorization: Section 10 n Section 404 n Section 10 & 404 n
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Stand m
✓ Nationwide Permit #
n RegionaldarGeneralPerit Permit #
n Jurisdictional Determination Request
H
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
n Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit
X Section 404 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
X 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes X No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
StoneyGreen Subdivision
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Judson Stringfellow
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
04196-537
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
JDSI, LLC
3d. Street address:
2116 Crown Centre Drive, Suite 200
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent X Other, specify: Developer
4b. Name:
David Hensley
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
SouthCraft Development
4d. Street address:
2116 Crown Centre Dr. Suite 200
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
4f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Rich Mogensen
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Mogensen Mitigation
5c. Street address:
PO Box 690429
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28227
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
10812119, 10812101A
lb. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.2531 Longitude: -80.6922
lc. Property size:
39.33 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Reedy Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin Pee Dee/03040105
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is located just west of Hood Road, south of Plaza Road Extension in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC. This site is partially forested with
areas of overgrown pasture and a private estate.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.627
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,575
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed residential development consists of one road crossing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: SAW-2019-01101
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
X Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Rich Mogensen
Agency/Consultant Company: Mogensen Mitigation
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
This site was verified by D. Shaeffer (USAGE) on 2/3/20. A copy of the signed JD approval is included in the Approvals section. Please note, between
the JD and PCN, discrepancies in stream and wetland measurements are the result of including Reedy Creek as the southern boundary.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes X No ❑Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections
❑ Wetlands
were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
X Streams — tributaries
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream (S-1)
PER
Corps
17
107
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
107
3i. Comments:
Riprap will be placed above the OHWM. total acreage of the impact is <0.05 acres.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization efforts by dedicating significant area as tree saves and avoiding —100% of
onsite wetlands and 97% of streams.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2:1 slopes will be used to minimize crossing impacts and riprap will be placed above the OHWM.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
No
❑ Yes X
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
28.36 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Storm water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not yet been submitted to City of Charlotte
but will be designed to meet their criteria.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Charlotte
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Charlotte
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
X Phase II
NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑Yes X No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑Yes ❑ No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑Yes X No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes X No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases proposed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ No
X Yes
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
No suitable habitat present. Habitat may occur for the Northern long-eared bat but the project is except as described in the attached Spangler T&E
report. The report has been submitted for concurrence.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
https://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ No
X Yes
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Impacts to floodplain are being coordinated with local FEMA floodplain managers and a Individual Floodplain Development Permit has been submitted
via Charlotte -Mecklenburg Stormwater Services.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
www.fema.gov
https://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
Rich Mogensen
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
, o'�n
06-10-2021
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 10812119, 10812101A
STREET ADDRESS: 8301 Hood Rd. Charlotte NC 28215
PROPERTY OWNER:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Richard Mogensen
, of Mogensen Mitigation
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Waters Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am the duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein.
PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESS (if different than property above):
2116 crown Centre Dr. STE 2oo, Charlotte NC 28277
PROPERTY OWNER CONTACT: David Hensley — 704-222-4542
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Au i.o -iz d Sign ure ` u Authorized Signature
Date: 4/5/21
Date: 4/6/21

Maps and Exhibits

1411,
-,-A, ioN.- N\\* vmpopp.,--•—diollow....-7—
t • igt
Or4
\Afttp
MECKLENBURG CO.
MMI
MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
GRAPHIC SCALE
1500 0 1500 3000
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
PO Box 690429
Charlotte, NC 28227
www.mogmit.com
DRAWN BY: J. LEE DATE: 06/12/2019
PROJECT MANAGER: R. MOGENSEN
LAYOUT: FIG 1 VICINITY MAP
jii
NOTES:
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOPO QUAD, HARRISBURG, NC 2016 (QUADRANGLE, QUAD ID:
8222799).
FIGURE 1
VICNITY MAP (USGS)
STONEY GREEN SUBDIVISION
HOOD ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

1 ill 1Jt�Jt
r3.
Voy,8ezr
C>
Q4Y40 41i£n, pR \ /
MECKLENBURG CO.
MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
GRAPHIC SCALE
1000 0 1000 2000
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc
PO Box 690429
Charlotte, NC 28227
www.mogmit.com
DRAWN BY: J. LEE DATE: 06/11/2019
PROJECT MANAGER: R. MOGENSEN
LAYOUT: FIG 2 USGS QUAD MAP
JPine
Ridge
'4D-pANR0
NOTES:
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOPO QUAD, HARRISBURG, NC 2016 (QUADRANGLE, QUAD ID:
8222799).
FIGURE 2
USGS QUAD MAP
STONEY GREEN SUBDIVISION
HOOD ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

SITE LOCATION
MECKLENBURG CO.
MMI
MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 150 300
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
PO Box 690429
Charlotte, NC 28227
www.mogmit.com
DRAWN BY: J. LEE DATE: 06/11/2019
PROJECT MANAGER: R. MOGENSEN
LAYOUT: FIG 3 AERIAL MAP
NOTES:
1) AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO ON JUNE 6, 2019,
DATED APRIL 26, 2018.
FIGURE 3
AERIAL MAP
STONEY GREEN SUBDIVISION
HOOD ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

MMI
MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SOIL TYPE
CeB2 - CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM (20.8%)
CeD2 - CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM (289%)
MeB - MECKLENBURG FINE SANDY LOAM (93%)
MO - MONACAN LOAM (36 5%)
VaB - VANCE SANDY LOAM (4 7*)
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 150 300
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
PO Box 690429
Charlotte, NC 28227
www.mogmit.com
DRAWN BY: J. LEE DATE: 06/11/2019
PROJECT MANAGER: R. MOGENSEN
LAYOUT: FIG 4 NRCS SOILS MAP
NOTES:
SOILS DATA OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
(NRCS) ON JUNE 5, 2019 (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov).
FIGURE 4
NRCS SOILS MAP
STONEY GREEN SUBDIVISION
HOOD ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

MECKLENBURG CO.
MMI
MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC
PROPERTY
Reedy Creek (along property line
2055-LF
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STREAM
WETLAND
PHOTOGRAPHY POINT (P P#)
C
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 150 300
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
PO Box 690429
Charlotte, NC 28227
www.mogmit.com
DRAWN BY: J. LEE DATE: 09/24/2019
PROJECT MANAGER: R. MOGENSEN
NOTES:
1) ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
2) STREAMS AND WETLANDS PRESENT ON -SITE DELINEATED WITH GPS ON JUNE 6,
JUNE 11, AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 BY SYNTERRA.
FIGURE 5
STREAM AND WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
STONEYGREENE SUBDIVISION
HOOD ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
SNOIIION00 ONIISIX]
9 8Z ON '31101HVHO '421 000H 60£8'8 928
NOISIAIO8f1S N33?:IOrl3NO±S
I ' i I ' ' � '+11� "lilt
k /• 1 /' _�/ / 1 + / 11g� )' I ///1+1�
\ ▪ �� // c/ �� �— v/1 / /1I� f l l �� IIII f11�`�6.
V\\\\ S bb /� 7' /7--' =/r./ s �� —)'fit ��i) -
1 ---144,,, ,
.„ ,,
0 11 I U , ,
1',
ofir2.0a, F: I 1 .
' 11".. 1,,,,tir
�tS i ''''' ;� R1� 0iAV ,� / M fi� (,dl /� //
// /
// I
N.���� : mil\ � _ ^��`.�`
II4\ ) \ 1 \ \ \T. \
It..,::::•.%
• ___ la ,/,i ...... _
• �` ` f \ \ \ \�� _� \ ,
\ / 1 1)
fr1
w n — _ -I 1 rN1
4 V ; -- = / 1 /" rI
--/1/ r—i
.io/)
/
/ /� 1 1 V 1
\-t\\‘Z'\
/ / /1 I(\/i//I„.I(-1./Kf1/./
/\V/\-,(I I
/
i ,' „�/1� '\,jl\,�\ Dili{(i11
J 1 i/, I1 illl I11\\ i 1' i+'11+
-`/''b F/, 11 f /J/1
— ,, )//// !l1`�`tyllll ` /////1/
1
is
h I
11
6MP'ONIISIX] ]ONeoe=riSIO WV]aS-OZ6 L

NV -Id d1IS
9 Z8ZON'3110121VHO'a2!a00H L0£8'89
NOISIAIO8f1S N3a10A3NaLS
a
.41#047,4
..,-:\* a "4*.f/t,r-.
AN \ „iii,„ et ty,
tOtt
_... .-',1.\1.. 44.4%,461k
1 I 1974 P.. Ve t)
ti
_I
...,. 0
0,24064 to
d vv.
0, k tl
114
\ 2 W
1...
Re
8,
It;
= 28.36% (HIGH DENSITY)
bMP'dONVBe=1OISIQ Wdde=11S—OZ6l�

,alo'22+m' mm m898
NOS &OenS N]]Iek]NO±S
B¥P72L ONd JONV@SfISIO INVjSIS—OZ6

AT
ll
1.1
.l
.1
♦
l�
1l
l
d1Idoe=id ie=un1nO
9 8Z ON '31101HVHO '421 OOOH 6O£8'8 928
NOISIAIO8f1S N33?:IOA3NO±S
CMP ® 0.62%
0
l
l
l
l
l
l
bMP'd1IdOe=ld dONV8eJn1SIO WVde=11S—OZ6 L1

Jurisdictional
Determination
Information

MECKLENBURG CO.
MMI
MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC
PROPERTY
Reedy Creek (along property line
2055-LF
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STREAM
WETLAND
PHOTOGRAPHY POINT (P P#)
C
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 150 300
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
PO Box 690429
Charlotte, NC 28227
www.mogmit.com
DRAWN BY: J. LEE DATE: 09/24/2019
PROJECT MANAGER: R. MOGENSEN
NOTES:
1) ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
2) STREAMS AND WETLANDS PRESENT ON -SITE DELINEATED WITH GPS ON JUNE 6,
JUNE 11, AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 BY SYNTERRA.
FIGURE 5
STREAM AND WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
STONEYGREENE SUBDIVISION
HOOD ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

Authorizations

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Td. SAW-2019-01101 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Harrisburg
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: JDSI, Inc.
Judson Stringfellow
Address: 3515 Dovewood Drive
Charlotte, NC 28226
Telephone Number: 704-361-7777
E-mail: 1udsonstrin¢fellow( mail.com
Size (acres) 15 Nearest Town Charlotte
Nearest Waterway Reedy Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.2531
Longitude: -80.6921
Location description: The review area is located on the west side of Hood Road, 0.43 miles south of the intersection of Plaza
Road Extension and Hood Road. PINs: 10812101 and 10812119.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 9/24/2019. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
E There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
ofthe Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this deteitnination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
E There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 ofthe Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once

SAW-2019-01101
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). if you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David L. Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or
david.l.shaeffer(a�usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 02/03/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. Tf you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. if you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. Tf you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
in order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
` A Digitally signed by
. ER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Date:2
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 020.02.03 09:08:16 -05'00'
Date of JD: 02/03/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2019-011 tll
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Pp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Svnterra, Corporation
Richard Mogensen
Address: 10430 Harris Oaks Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28269
Telephone Number: 704-576-1111
E-mail: rmogensen(asynterracorp.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: JDSI, Inc. Judson Stringfellow File Number: SAW-2019-01101 Date: 02/03/2020
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENTAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
x
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative
Additional information may be found at or
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
appeal of the above decision.
the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part
331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: Tf you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for
final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized.
Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and
waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations
associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section TT of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for
final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized.
Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and
waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations
associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: if you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions
therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing
Section TT of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of
the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved
JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section IT of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This
form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be
appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further
consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
ir
SECTION TT -REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your
reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for
the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is
needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the
record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the
administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RTGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during
day notice of any site investigation, and will have the op
of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15
Dortunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David L. Shaeffer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 02/03/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: JDSI, Inc., Judson Stringfellow, 3515
Dovewood Drive, Charlotte, NC 28226
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Purser Hood Road Site,
SAW-2019-01101
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located on the
west side of Hood Road, 0.43 miles south of the intersection of Plaza Road Extension and Hood Road. PINs:
10812101 and 10812119.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.2531 Longitude: -80.6921
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Reedy Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
© Field Determination. Date(s): 9/24/2019 by the Corps
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resources in
review area
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs.
non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
W-1
35.2520
-80.6925
0.020 ac
Wetland
404
W-2
35.2515
-80.6902
0.0569 ac
Wetland
404
W-3
35.2532
-80.6920
0.038 ac
Wetland
404
S-1
35.2526
-80.6921
1,320 If
Non -wetland
404
S-2
35.2519
-80.6935
200 If
Non -wetland
404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a pei nit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
❑X Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Fimure 6A dated 9/24/2019
❑X Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
❑X Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑X U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: Nationalmap.6ov
▪ USGS NHD data:
DUSGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
ZNatural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ESRI NRCS SSURGO Soils Mapservice
El National inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Mapservice
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑X Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or Z Other (Name & Date): 12 photos dated 6/06/2019 and 6/11/2019
▪ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
▪ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Date: 2020.02.03 09:08:51 -05'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting PJD
staff member completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
02/03/2020 impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timefi-anes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
tune frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

MECKLENBURG CO.
STREAM S-2
• 200-LF
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STREAM
WETLAND
PHOTOGRAPHY POINT (P P #)
C
WETLAND W-3
0.038-ACRE 1
WETLAND W-2
0.569-ACRE
NOTES:
1) ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
2) STREAMS AND WETLANDS PRESENT ON -SITE DELINEATED WITH GPS ON JUNE 6,
JUNE 11, AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 BY SYNTERRA.
synTerra
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 150 300
10430 HARRIS OAKS BOULEVARD, SUITE H
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28269
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: J. LEE DATE: 09/24/2019
PROJECT MANAGER: R. MOGENSEN
LAYOUT: FIG 6A WETLANDS DELINEATION MAP
FIGURE 6A
STREAM AND WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
PURSER PROPERTY
HOOD ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
PARCEL #: 1081-2101
09/24/20194.15 PM GRIIM LEE \ Projects \Ruh Mogensen\Purser \Purser -Fig. 6A Wetlands Delineation Map. dwg

Threatened and Endangered Species Report
Cultural Resources Evaluation

69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Environmental Planning Environmental Permitting Environmental Consulting Environmental Construction Management Expert Testimony
28 May 2021
Mr. Judson Stringfellow
South Craft Development, LLC
2116 Crown Centre Drive, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28226
RE: Hood Road — Threatened and Endangered Species Memo
Mr. Stringfellow:
Upon your authorization Spangler Environmental, Inc. (SEI) visited the subject property, located at 8215 Hood Road,
Charlotte, North Carolina (Mecklenburg County PIN# 10812101) on 18 May 2021 to determine if it contains rare and/or
protected species and/or their critical habitat(s), or if either is recorded in federal and/or state databases within or near
the subject property.
Threatened and Endangered Species:
SEI has reviewed information obtained from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) through the
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool.
Additionally, SEI has reviewed information obtained from the North Carolina National Heritage Program (NCNHP). In
order to determine if there is a reasonable likelihood of a protected species occurring on the subject property, a
discretionary threshold has been established of an element occurrence within one mile of the subject property and/or
critical habit corresponding to that species identified on the property through site reconnaissance and/or a records review.
Data Review:
Based on our review of the USFWS IPaC report (Consultation Code 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0584), there are five federally
protected species which may occur in the project area and/or be affected by the proposed project, including: northern
long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii),
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata).
Based on our review of the NCNHP data, there are no element occurrences of protected species or natural areas within
the subject property; however, there are two element occurrences within one mile of the subject property: tall larkspur
(Delphinium exaltatum) and Georgia aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum). In addition, there is one natural area and six
managed areas. One managed area is also shown to be within the subject property on the NCNHP report, however, this
managed area only borders the subject property and is located on the adjacent parcel. The natural area within one mile is
Reedy Creek Nature Preserve Forests and the managed areas include City of Charlotte open spaces, Mecklenburg County
open spaces, Catawba Lands Conservancy Easement, and the Reedy Creek Greenway Easement.
Site Reconnaissance:
A reconnaissance of the site was completed on 18 May 2021. Topographic, hydrologic, and aerial maps of the tract were
reviewed to determine distinct community locations. Communities were assigned based on observed vegetation,
topography, hydrology, and soil type. The majority of the property is comprised of piedmont levee forest, although a
meadow and recently demolished residential property are present in the eastern portions of the property. Reedy Creek
runs along the southern property line.
4338 Bland Road Raleigh, N.C. 27609 phone 9I9-875-4288 fax 9I9-875-4287
TOLL FREE I-866-SPANGLER www.spanglerenvironmental.com

IPAC protected species possibly in the vicinity of the project area:
Northern Long -Eared Bat
Northern long-eared bat is a federally threatened bat species with a body length of 3 to 3.7 inches, and a wingspan of 9
to 10 inches. Their fur color can be medium to dark brown on the back and tawny to pale -brown on the
underside. Northern long-eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula. They use areas in
various sized caves or mines with constant temperatures, high humidity, and no air currents. During the summer, northern
long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities or in crevices of both live trees and snags (dead
trees). Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. Northern long-eared
bats seem to be flexible in selecting roosts, choosing roost trees based on suitability to retain bark or provide cavities or
crevices. This bat has also been found rarely roosting in structures, like barns and sheds. Although the project area
contains potentially suitable forested habitat, no northern long-eared bats were observed at the time of inspection, and
NC NHP data contains no recorded occurrences in or within one mile of the subject property.
Therefore, it is the opinion of SEI that the proposed project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect northern long-
eared bat.
Carolina Heelsplitter
The Carolina heelsplitter is a federally endangered freshwater mussel with an egg -shaped shell that varies from greenish
brown to dark brown in color. They are found in cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable, silt -free stream bottoms
appear to be critical to the species. Typically, stable areas occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with trees
and shrubs. A stream is present along the southern property line; however, the stream's substrate is very silty. In addition,
NC NHP data contains no recorded occurrences in or within one mile of the subject property.
Therefore, it is the opinion of SEI that the proposed project will have no effect on the Carolina heelsplitter.
Michaux's Sumac
Michaux's sumac is a federal and state (NC) endangered plant which generally occurs in sandy or rocky open woods and
is dependent upon some form of disturbance to maintain the open quality of its habitat. Historically, this disturbance was
due to periodic, naturally occurring fires; however, current habitat for Michaux's sumac is often artificially disturbed, for
example highway and railroad rights -of -way, pine plantations, and edges of cultivated fields and other cleared lands.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the optimal time frame for conducting Michaux's sumac
surveys is from May to October. Although potentially suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac exists within the project area,
none were observed at the time of inspection, and NC NHP data contains no recorded occurrences in or within one mile
of the subject property.
Therefore, it is the opinion of SEI that the proposed project will have no effect on Michaux's sumac.
Schweinitz's Sunflower
Schweinitz's sunflower is a federally endangered perennial herb that regularly grows approximately 6% feet tall (though
it can be shorter if young or injured) and can occasionally reach heights of 16 feet. It occurs in full to partial sun and is
found in areas with poor soils, such as thin clays that vary from wet to dry. Although potentially suitable habitat for
Schweinitz's sunflower exists within the project area, none were observed at the time of inspection, and NC NHP data
contains no recorded occurrences in or within one mile of the subject property.
Therefore, it is the opinion of SEI that the proposed project will have no effect on Schweinitz's sunflower.
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Smooth Coneflower
Smooth coneflower is a federally endangered perennial herb. It is typically found in open woods, glades, cedar barrens,
roadsides, clearcuts, dry limestone bluffs, and power line rights -of -way, usually on magnesium and calcium rich soils.
Optimal sites are characterized by abundant sunlight and little competition in the herbaceous layer. Limited potentially
suitable habitat for smooth coneflower exists within the project area; however, none were observed at the time of
inspection, and NC NHP data contains no recorded occurrences in or within one mile of the subject property.
Therefore, it is the opinion of SEI that the proposed project will have no effect on smooth coneflower.
NC NHP protected species within one -mile of the project area:
Tall Larkspur
Tall Larkspur is a state (NC) endangered herbaceous perennial that averages between 4 and 6 feet in height and 1 to 2
feet in width. This member of the buttercup family blooms from July to September, has blue or purple flowers and
palmately divided, deep -green leaves. It prefers full sun and can often be found in moist but well -drained fertile soils of
the mountains and piedmont. In NC it is found mostly in the mountains in clearings or the edge of woodlands. Although
potentially suitable edge habitat was observed within the project area, no tall larkspur was observed at the time of
inspection.
Therefore, it is the opinion of SEI that the proposed project will have no effect on tall larkspur.
Georgia Aster
The Georgia Aster is a state (NC) threatened herbaceous perennial with white and/or purple flowers that bloom from
early October to mid -November. Their primary habitat is in piedmont prairies or woodlands with acidic soils, and prefer
at least moderate light, with heavy shade being a limiting factor. For this reason, this species thrives in fire -ecosystems
where excessive understory is kept at bay and have become significantly less common with increased fire suppression.
No suitable open understory habitat was observed within the project area, and no Georgia Aster was found on the subject
property.
Therefore, it is the opinion of SEI that the proposed project will have no effect on smooth coneflower.
Conclusions:
Based on field observations and the review of available data, SEI did not identify any protected species within the
project area. As a result, impacts to protected species are not anticipated. No further investigation is recommended at
this time.
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Should you have any questions, or require additional clarification, please call.
Sincerely,
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
Lisa Long
Environmental Scientist — Land & Water Resources
Attachments:
Site Photographs
NCNHP report
IPaC Report
NLEB MA Documentation Letter
62,3/A-v
Ward Marotti
Director — Land & Water Resources
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Figure 1: Piedmont levee forest,
6
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Fizure 2: Meadow
6
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Figure 3: Recently demolished residential property
6
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Fizure 4: Reedy Creek
6
SPANGL,ER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

■■■
■■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
as ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■
May 13, 2021
Maria Polizzi
Spangler Environmental Inc.
4338 Bland Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Hood Road
Dear Maria Polizzi:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-14677
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerca ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 w. JOrNES STREET. RALEIGH. reC 27603 = 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NuC 271609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX 919,707,9121

No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
\ \:
_E= /
/ $ ~ /
/ E _E CD
w>®%
aas
%.E > \
3LT) 2>
/ § / E
} / \ a)
y y 0 4
/\ CD /
\ % 0 \
/ / ® e \ e 0
} = z \
/ \ a-)
/
o
j/ �.
% ®\ /
\ / « w
ewers
/ _ _ .k
& $ t .»
_EE /ow
w > / _
3 °s2
)\/
u / It ±
e e % z
z = a z
\ \ `
k = / 9
\ \ \
a2\
=Z
2 } 0
G ) ®
u w e e
/\%3
LE
0)
> e 2
> 0 (0
/ 2 ® `
\\/D
\-* ( \
E \ / /
\ z 2
/
\ Z
_ w .e
/ 2 0 O
\ (1.)
\
/ j / /
c = =
\\ \
3 ®\
\ \ \ \
\ a)/ \
E\}«
a-)2
\\c
0 0 z /
_ ® (0
a) -c _E\
/ ƒ \ /
e
\ \ / a-)
Z w e
\
\
\
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
NCNHP, Q1 April 2021. Please
cnhde.natureserve.or

r6
N
O
N
O
0_
N
O
r6
N
E
N
c
0
r6
c
to
r6
N
a- )
-0 NCO
ro 0 O -
N
W
j Q
c 00 >o z
cri
_ � U
N
a)
a)
O
a)
a)
w
a)
a)
a
Radius of the
0
a)
c
a)
E
0
0
N
O
c
N
0
0
0
c
N
E
G3G4 S3S4
O
Observation
a)
E
c
O
E
a)
E
N
Q m v
O_
O
r r.
CD n CD
a 9
o 4
_Q .� W _Q
cnm s-cn
O
E O - c
0 V) 0
-c c
CD i - CD
o O
•
•
> >
4-, 4-,
C c
—
a f6E`6E
XO }'E�'E
H(D Z U Z U W
O
O
0
a)
4J
a)
0
W
0
0
z
0
Community
2007-10-08
•
•
r6
4J
r6
z
w
0
W
Endangered
r.
I
O
O
op
I
1958-08-06
Crested Coralroot
Hexalectris spicata
0
M
Vascular Plant
Candidate
2019-10-07
Georgia Aster
Symphyotrichum
Vascular Plant
georgianum
E
CD
c
O
c
c
a)
E
Natural Areas Doc
1
O
r6
CD
a
CD
Site Name
C4 (Moderate)
Reedy Creek Nature Preserve Forest
a)
c
0
c
LE
a)
c
a)
E
O
O
n
92 92
QQ
N N
O) O)
(0 (0
E c
Mecklenburg County
Reedy Creek
0
a
()
c
a)
a
0
c
0
U
C)
_O
c
N
O
N
Nature Preserve
c
a)
E
a)
w
0
c
ro
to
c
0
U
c
J
r6
_Q
r6
r6
v
Government
Mecklenburg County
a)
w
a)
a)
a)
0
a
()
c
a)
a
0
c
0
U
C)
N
c
N
a)a)
Government
Government
a)
4J
0
_c
v
0
U
CD CD
a a
cn cn
E c
CD CD
a a
O O
CD CD
0 0
_C _• C
U U
O O
� �
.0 .0
Government
c
0
C)
_Q
c
CD
0
CD
L)
0
N
(7)
a

NCNHP, Q1 April 2021. Please
0
U
0
0
N
0
M M
- 4
T 2'
O a
0
Z
▪ U
CO Z
c
0
0)0
a) a)
7
CO M
C 0
0
0
U
0
O
CO
E
0
0
9
0
LO
0
O
CO
_cI o
• U
73
O 0
0
O Q
a)
4 0
C
U
O co
U
- co
O co
• Cll
cn
O Le
0
0
O O
c
cn +�
a)
• 0
• E
co w
in
O �
C
O
O O
O O
0
7-0
X E
a
O O
� O
0 0
(e O
N T
.E - 4
w �
CI
71)
ncnhde.natureserve.or
LO

NCNHDE-14677: Hood Road
N
M Q _
N G
0,1
O
d
Project Boundary
_
Buffered Project Boundary
w � N
C79L7
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
•
Managed Area (MAREA)
0
w
a

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0584
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412
Project Name: Hood Rd
May 19, 2021
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) —Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nccounties.html. The AFO website list includes "species of concern" — species that
could potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future.
Also available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project review/Recommendations.html
• Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant survey.html
• Northern long-eared bat Guidance
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project review/NLEB in WNC.html
• Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 2
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may
be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of
the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/assessment guidance.html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://
www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
hops://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should
follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www. fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers. htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0584
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412
Project Name: Hood Rd
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: Proposed development
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.2527265,-80.69257415277875,14z
Counties: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Clams
NAME
STATUS
Threatened
STATUS
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534
Flowering Plants
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 4
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

05/19/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Sep 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds May 1
to Jun 30

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 2
NAME
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws. gov/ecp/species/2974
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds Apr 28
to Jul 20
Breeds Apr 20
to Aug 20
Breeds May 1
to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee

05/19/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
—
probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Blue -winged
Warbler
BCC - BCR
Cerulean Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Kentucky Warbler
..•• ssr rsss iiii 1111 1111 1111
+ +++ ++++ ++++ ++01 I I ' I ' 11 ---+ ++++ +"+ ++++ ++-+ +++-
+ +++ ++++ ++++ ++II 1111 sill III+ ++++ ++++ ++++ -1--I- --I- +++-
++++ ++++ ++++ ++i 1111111111111111+ ++++ ++++ ++-+ +++-

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 4
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
++++ ++++ ++++ ++1+ 1111 1111
ii:' ++++ ++++ ++++
++++ ++++ ++++ 1111 1111 1111 I11.1 ++- --'- 4±k±±±±
1111 1111 11"++++
++++ +II+ ++1+ $+++ ++++ ++-- ---+
++++ ++++ ++++ +„i all Al
++++ ++++ ++++
1111 IIFy. ±--,
++—+ +++—
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/
management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 5
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

05/19/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412 6
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

05/19/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-01412
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
RIVERINE
• R2UBHx
• R4SBC

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
IPaC Record Locator: 312-102405687
May 25, 2021
Subject: Consistency letter for the 'Hood Rd' project indicating that any take of the northern
long-eared bat that may occur as a result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA
Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at 50 CFR §17.40(o).
Dear Lisa Long:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received on May 25, 2021 your effects
determination for the 'Hood Rd' (the Action) using the northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis) key within the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system. You
indicated that no Federal agencies are involved in funding or authorizing this Action. This IPaC
key assists users in determining whether a non -Federal action may cause "take"111 of the northern
long-eared bat that is prohibited under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat.884,
as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Based upon your IPaC submission, any take of the northern long-eared bat that may occur as a
result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at
50 CFR §17.40(0). Unless the Service advises you within 30 days of the date of this letter that
your IPaC-assisted determination was incorrect, this letter verifies that the Action is not likely to
result in unauthorized take of the northern long-eared bat.
Please report to our office any changes to the information about the Action that you entered into
IPaC, the results of any bat surveys conducted in the Action area, and any dead, injured, or sick
northern long-eared bats that are found during Action implementation.
If your Action proceeds as described and no additional information about the Action's effects on
species protected under the ESA becomes available, no further coordination with the Service is
required with respect to the northern long-eared bat.
The IPaC-assisted determination for the northern long-eared bat does not apply to the following
ESA -protected species that also may occur in your Action area:
• Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata Endangered
• Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
• Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered

05/25/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 312-102405687 2
• Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Endangered
You may coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may cause prohibited take
of the animal species listed above.
[1]Take means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to
attempt to engage in any such conduct [ESA Section 3(19)].

05/25/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 312-102405687 3
Action Description
You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action.
1. Name
Hood Rd
2. Description
The following description was provided for the project 'Hood Rd':
Proposed development
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://www.google.com/
maps/@35.2527265,-80.69257415277875,14z
Determination Key Result
This non -Federal Action may affect the northern long-eared bat; however, any take of this
species that may occur incidental to this Action is not prohibited under the final 4(d) rule at 50
CFR §17.40(o).
Determination Key Description: Northern Long-eared Bat 4(d) Rule
This key was last updated in IPaC on May 15, 2017. Keys are subject to periodic revision.
This key is intended for actions that may affect the threatened northern long-eared bat.
The purpose of the key for non -Federal actions is to assist determinations as to whether proposed
actions are excepted from take prohibitions under the northern long-eared bat 4(d) rule.
If a non -Federal action may cause prohibited take of northern long-eared bats or other ESA -listed
animal species, we recommend that you coordinate with the Service.

05/25/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 312-102405687 4
Determination Key Result
Based upon your IPaC submission, any take of the northern long-eared bat that may occur as a
result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at
50 CFR §17.40(o).
Qualification Interview
1.
2.
3.
Is the action authorized, funded, or being carried out by a Federal agency?
No
Will your activity purposefully Take northern long-eared bats?
No
[Semantic] Is the project action area located wholly outside the White -nose Syndrome
Zone?
Automatically answered
No
4. Have you contacted the appropriate agency to determine if your project is near a known
hibernaculum or maternity roost tree?
Location information for northern long-eared bat hibernacula is generally kept in state
Natural Heritage Inventory databases — the availability of this data varies state -by -state.
Many states provide online access to their data, either directly by providing maps or by
providing the opportunity to make a data request. In some cases, to protect those resources,
access to the information may be limited. A web page with links to state Natural Heritage
Inventory databases and other sources of information on the locations of northern long-
eared bat roost trees and hibernacula is available at www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/
mammals/nleb/nhisites.html.
Yes
5. Will the action affect a cave or mine where northern long-eared bats are known to
hibernate (i.e., hibernaculum) or could it alter the entrance or the environment (physical or
other alteration) of a hibernaculum?
No
6. Will the action involve Tree Removal?
Yes
7. Will the action only remove hazardous trees for the protection of human life or property?
No
8. Will the action remove trees within 0.25 miles of a known northern long-eared bat
hibernaculum at any time of year?
No

05/25/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 312-102405687 5
9. Will the action remove a known occupied northern long-eared bat maternity roost tree or
any trees within 150 feet of a known occupied maternity roost tree from June 1 through
July 31?
No

05/25/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 312-102405687
Project Questionnaire
If the project includes forest conversion, report the appropriate acreages below.
Otherwise, type '0' in questions 1-3.
1. Estimated total acres of forest conversion:
10
2. If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from April 1 to October 31
0
3. If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from June 1 to July 31
0
If the project includes timber harvest, report the appropriate acreages below.
Otherwise, type '0' in questions 4-6.
4. Estimated total acres of timber harvest
0
5. If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from April 1 to October 31
0
6. If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from June 1 to July 31
0
If the project includes prescribed fire, report the appropriate acreages below.
Otherwise, type '0' in questions 7-9.
7. Estimated total acres of prescribed fire
0
8. If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from April 1 to October 31
0
9. If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from June 1 to July 31
0
If the project includes new wind turbines, report the megawatts of wind capacity
below. Otherwise, type '0' in question 10.
10. What is the estimated wind capacity (in megawatts) of the new turbine(s)?
0