The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About830017_Compliance Inspection_20210512Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 830017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS830017 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Scotland Region: Date of Visit: 05/12/2021 Entry Time: 08:00 am Exit Time: 4:00 pm Incident #: Farm Name: Farm 7668 Owner Email: Fayetteville Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: 910-296-1800 Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Physical Address: Facility Status: Location of Farm: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Latitude: Warsaw NC 283980487 Murphy -Brown LLC 34° 48' 26" Longitude: 79° 30' 37" From Laurinburg take 74 Bus. West and go out of town and pass Hwy 79 (on left) and proceed on 74 Bus. for about 0.5 mile and turn Rt. on SR 1303 and go over railroad crossing and go over the crossroad and the farm entrance is 0.5 mile on the right. Question Areas: ▪ Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application ▪ Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Secondary OIC(s): Michael L Cudd Operator Certification Number: 25233 On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Cudd On -site representative Mike Cudd Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Katie Fontenot Phone: 910-433-3327 Date: Inspection Summary: #11. Farm irrigated on a field with no crop 30 days before the crop was planted, however the crop was not planted. The people planting are running behind but are planning on planting corn in the next day or two. Note: This farm is a transfer station. Note: This farm uses airway to irrigate. Note: Some soil sample IDs had a low PH and high P-I keep an eye on this. Page 1 of 5 Permit: AWS830017 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Inspection Date: 05/12/21 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 830017 Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Swine Swine - Farrow to Wean Waste Structures Type 1,200 500 Identifier Effective Date Total Design Capacity: Total SSLW: Built Date 1,200 519,600 Closed Designated Observed Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon 76681 06/12/2006 D1/01/1999 28.08 Lagoon A 12/20/2005 D1/01/1999 29.40 66.00 Lagoon B 06/12/2006 10/01/2019 26.00 64.00 Page 2 of 5 Permit: AWS830017 Inspection Date: 05/12/21 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830017 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? Crop Type 1 Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ IEI ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ •❑ ❑ ❑ El IEI • Corn (Grain) Page 3 of 5 Permit: AWS830017 Inspection Date: 05/12/21 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830017 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? Yes No NA NE Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture) Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ Page 4 of 5 Permit: AWS830017 Inspection Date: 05/12/21 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 830017 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Stocking? Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon / Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 5