780101_Compliance Inspection Routine_20210524

Division of Wa",tc
Divisiontof Soil!
( Other Agency=
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: IS Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
1
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Farr NamecthW mf l i{u d FQtr lc2 11 C
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: I VYjo1V Region: pI V
Facility Contact: 9-No r i cN I Title: rQ, Ur
Onsite Representative: CA I Y R/
Certified Operator: C, a
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
krv+-?
r = +
winWineN ,
•<P,x ^=x p.
'
Desigit ,Ct went ; z Design Current
Capaci , £ + Vet Poultry Capaert3 + ; Pop
s ., i +si {y �hx ,. ! n
Cattle A
•" n
� Curr
JSesign + rent
Capacit3
diP
#
Y.
ti
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
"x
Non Layer
Dairy Calf
k+l
+.. a
Feeder to Finish
=y
»a
t h +
++
y i r t t
a ms ii x r r iu
� t � Dosignl s�A[;>aont
V Y 4 tt-0r 4
Dr ;Pout C�a i aca Ii4 I
,, „
a
=
Dairy Heifer
xk
yy
�u
�r
+ „'
Farrow to Wean
s.5.,
4 4AY
+ t
Dry Cow
tx+-
i,~••..
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
'" •
Layers --
£ `r
Beef Stocker
Gilts
•
Non -Layers --
.==i
Beef Feeder
Boars
•
Pullets --
"
Beef Brood Cow
z s'
wA , Ottior
# Y 4
n;.Fx +A.
x st
ry
v i
Turke Pouets
•
Other
+.0 441M. M.. .. ..+.. +.0
"i. tad" it.X v,y •.5. .r tv _ v"
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes El No El NA NE
El Yes D No D NA D NE
El Yes El No DNA D NE
El Yes No D NA NE
El Yes D No D NA El NE
El Yes El No NA D NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:lb
I�y
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
IDate of Inspection: 92..9191
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): q
13. Soil Type(s): i»a / Ede/
/
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the C"AWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the C4WMP readily available? If yes check
the appropriate
ecklists ease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box bel w.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ['Waste Analysis Soil Analysis
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
es gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
00ther:
Hires ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes

Facility Number: 1e® - I 01
Date of Inspection: Si z iI2.
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ NE
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field
❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the foN'Ng '±ems r -fro be IN recofdS GO CIUI'-
con review,
-Cepgit1
- Pehm�'I:
-uuQ(te u11l12 1bN Plan
-con a na t1c4 9
_. reel Ca I 1 bra'DN .
'e d 1 s r-e g ord pay had t{e rem o r —I P ctRiS
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
All inWilliot
Phone:
6'/ a S3s--97€t
119.9)9b- g115
Date: 9/ i I )11
2/4/2015

FACILITY #: Vi/ FARM Sing�l �Fvr& I l 1 (/,I wit �4
FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF
- ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES or (ioq 1 i
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60�ll �-i DAYS
�BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE ) t /i
I ( NITROGEN LEVEL° • 17 / j' `a/ < OIZZ) I
EVERY 3 YEARS:
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
Nor IN
SOIL REPORT (#21)
DATE
ZN
IRR2 (#21)� iG ZONE ACRES PAN CROP TYPE ,cUq: Bed
FLOW RATES 129 o�Qj
NITROGEN (N) 0' 6 /) •9e) I ',l a, 0.aa
120 Min inspection initialed "Ie`p Weather Codes le,5,
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter
CALBRIATION (#24)

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED \ i%'j f
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS \ { W
- FLOW RATES
R,I FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
SLUD E (#21 &25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: D T
0:311 P: _ % RATIO OFSLUDGEC^97
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM S€ 7 CROP YEILDS MORTALITY.
r
VISUAL CHECK
Nq
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE