090213_Compliance Inspection Routine_20210524

Type of Visit: ((Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: OD Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
Se ftft
cedar Bcd Farm
ownerName:6)Toell e �cuI v e
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Departure Time:I t O 1 W r County: 5I (1 1 ZN
Owner Email:
Phone:
Region: f ru
$o Kennedy
Onsite Representative: 13en0 }0.nn€'dj
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
9eNt Kenn2dY
Title: TQ.U'\ C4'
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Mt�57it�e d
Design
G�apaciy
C rent (
Llop�
r Detsig aF Chit:rent
et out try Capactty.rg
¢ ;
xix .��Cinle
Design
k rc CAPasty3 s Qpfr,
yew
Wean to Finish
`^'
Layer
k
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non Layer
r'rc?
Dairy Calf
s.
ka
ys�
t1\A
Feeder to Finish
# '
a r
`,' 4 x•• n r �
$ W. <.
o ° t
#
� a axt
D sign
C` i pGr .",
' "''
r sd �yE
Cur enti
�
Dairy Heifer
ry
1 s
Farrow to Wean
3' j C)
.300 J
r;
^ i
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
$';P , i'.
t f
Non -Dairy
t *
t.'
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
„t
Gilts
Non -Layers
--
j;
Beef Feeder
*;r
Boars.;.
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
ik9
r$I
tOOthert'
k ^
ki �� 4
#*�■
Turke Pullts
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ]No ❑NA ❑NE
El Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes 9(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 9
Date of Inspection:Gil241 z!
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes jg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 51.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? €CI?49e v] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
/9
23
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes c2; No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): p)ennticiaii, Gm ca/ 9}radlsi
13. SoilType(s): wa 1Q)Ia; Lynn n f i it\ , i D v/
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps 0 Lease Agreements ❑Other:
Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Week! Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking Crop Yiel 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes F'c' No 0 NA 0 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rnNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ti4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 14No ❑NA ❑NE
41Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes c83No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1i1 No ❑ NA 0 NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.

Facility Number: 1 - 12)
(Date of Inspection: to 19.11 Lj 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit I ❑ Yes tA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 1A Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
'En Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �.) No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA 0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ly No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VI No 0 NA ❑ NE
0 Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
is. tgsr GlVCge Survey wqs dove o'i nl'-02°, this iG due
ev(J Ljec - 3 rids to be d©ttQ as Soot/ QC po c iNe
'� CM' 11 P�0C r 4 to lQ IN re�aiis, It dill 1(1l-e h01 t
*wOS OY\ Gift,
F LigonN ;t1.11 Cre4t Nq 14g oovv ruefiq it k purnrecl iorfuN tb
use,
•
T alftMc- bel'd t, ,l ft I_7e Our4
ictrveq
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Kati-e, y ri o t Data, . a, k1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
jwot `
9>o `-- 1-
Phone: l '1 `Y 9i P
Date: q2-241
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015

FACILITY #: 9.� 215
FARM NAME: cego-
FREE(3O ®(� tL` ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
7� '`�F� AT
PERMIT (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS rj a� . fig
- EXPERIATION DATE cl160, of I NUMBER OF ANIMALS '� 100
- ACTUAL NUMBER OF A IM L
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULDkVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIS LDR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps VS reel p &
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE lig'Z2J NITROGEN LEVEL 0,91
SOIL REPORT (#21)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE^`II &O/2W/
- P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)1 y 11 i I5 s I ErW j
- PH (Note if4orless) Liii G.9i (p•a
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU�i 1 110,2S ZN 115. -0Bp� I b17
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
ZONE ACRES
FLOW RATES 1S
120 Min inspection initialed
IRR2_(#21)
PAN a. CROP TYPEt4) hay ay farrh ` 't
NITROGEN (N)f
Weather Codes /
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter
CALBRIATION (#24)
Hitt-
Ic«t FUn-e0

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED l J aia)
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS
- FLOW RATES el 9COO (Alt )
RAINyFALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
reel Pivat
11131a0,0
LUD #21 &25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE I1 'UDP0
O: a .T h P: 22 e) % RATIO OF SLUDGE 011
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM ""i/. CROP YEILDS MORTALITY /
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE