780081_Compliance Inspection Routine_20210524

Type of Visit: yj Compliance Inspection 0 Operation. Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Q1211
Farm Name: BULKhOY
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: 1112n1V Region: 'Fr-)
1eNDNci1
Onsite Representative: 64 I
11/41.
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
601119
Title: M1 C8%
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
t^ SwmeA
Design ,Ctirrent a A v
Capactop. A
a` r •„ Design Cutjrenf
etPoultry ,t ap`acity +Po
Cattle
Design ;Current
Capacity sPop
*,.
Wean to Finish;
Wean to Feeder
Layer
Dairy Cow
Non Layer
, :'
Dairy Calf
E
Feeder to Finish
4
: �
8 ai rs+ xx at
A, +,� �, ,
`) + � -i A °�.lyggtgu,c��irreht
Dr ;Pouf ; rCa' aci A )"cPxi ,.
r
Dairy Heifer
�Farrow
to Wean
��tio
�iC�rt
fix''
a „
t ";
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
J—
:
Non -Dairy
M5
Farrow to Finish
e���--
'`
Beef Stocker
Gilts
u'•
Non -La ers --
r =
Beef Feeder
t *
Boars
•
Pullets --'
Beef Brood Cow
Jther +
Turkeys
`,'•TurkeyPoults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:'1t, - ? 1
Date of Inspection: SI2 2-+
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier: t
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
to
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? t 1 qc, i I
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
-4v1A4-4e& 644n0 , eaaz,, G ry 74os
G .n- / Gerd& < , /O6i4
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
WUP ❑Checklists 4Design 0 Maps $Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
J Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1:ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes " No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes tt No ❑ NA
❑ NE
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes "&No ❑NA El NE
❑ Rainfall
❑ Yes\LINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
❑ Yes ";:q No
❑ Yes 1SkNo
❑ Yes fQNo
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes '& No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes
Yes
❑ Other:
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
RI Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ['Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
Stocking gCrop Yield X120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall -Inspections
❑ Yes
r/
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Sludge Survey
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L.L.
❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
\ ,5/l2/2020 Continued

Facility Number:1 - I 'Date of Inspection: S li1 �I I
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
N
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes \R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Ye`s'.,,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes'`.❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (Le., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) `�
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L\], No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes `0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yet--Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Perrhat
✓uF//�rZO /u ems./ 4t --eaceri.42 Se
tpu Ae_e /L0456.4", e to L9k
ho0
41.. Gut Mel' LI.
YQArmvZ -Writ" J N 1 q4 v
gad qxs- 095
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
`MQ;
N1 Phone:111 (0 Ti l e
/3OA 4 „tf4l t Date: r'J 1
/ 2/4/2015

FACILITY #:J
FARM NAME: La ,/ c c w`
FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE
- ACTUAL NU q ER OF ANIMAL
- OICCARP RNO
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A -) NEGATIVE NUMBER
O HECK LIST YES 0
rrigation Plan Maps
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 511Q/2,I NITROGEN LEVEL J, (
/1)
SOIL REPORT (#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE 1//lt,/?O I t
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less) to Vi91(Ci 3 S1 )
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU 31 L1 k1 3 3 ZN 1 Lig, 2 Y 4, 27
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
IRR2 (#21)
ZONE ACRES 72 7 PAN CROP TYPE
NITROGEN (N)
FLOW RATES /14P
02,(97,r&b ).(5 l 3?
120 Min inspection nitialed ?O,.n, Weather Codes //
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter
041- tt,u)DF-t amr44 r t
q`'/2/ 390 CALBRIATION(#24)
I lea y ��(, �.
�'1q/7 I a r
L�/�c�(a/
q/3dlz(
Sit/ /?0 /
�7s

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS ° ,/ 77
- FLOW RATES i q oa .y
RAIN FALL (#2-)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT //
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
LUDGE (#2- &25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE it /%/ a-b
O: 3> o L# P: 3, C y % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM "v CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE